Appendix — Brooks v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.
Supreme Court brief1946
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
ee tae a Soro ny ag TTS
ony. —— :
SAPD ele WILL EIA ee PRED HOI BEY
=
(2Q APR 15 1946
GRARLIS ELMORE
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
OCTOBER TERM, 1945
Nos. 1108-111]
ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY,
Desror, LOLA BROOKS, Apmrnistratrix oF THE EstaTE
or F. 8S. Brooks, Deceasep, ET AL.,
Petitioners,
vs.
FORT SCOTT BONDHOLDERS’ COMMITTEE, BANK-
ERS TRUST COMPANY, TRUSTEE FOR THE KAN-
SAS CITY, FORT SCOTT & MEMPHIS R. CO., ET AL.
APPENDIX TO PETITIONS FOR WRITS OF CERTI-
ORARI TO THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT
OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
. Te en ae a eR LN en he RS HR
ey ee tt ME Ser CE ark as aaa ed
rr te
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION
ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY
COMPANY REORGANIZATION
SUBMISSION OF PLAN OF REORGANIZATION
PuRSUANT TO SECTION 77 OF THE
Bankruptcy Act, As AMENDED
FInaNcE Docket No. 10008
CONTENTS
PAGE
Plan of Reorganization approved by the Commission and Court 1
Additional Clauses from Commission’s order ............... 23
Reports of the Commission:
ee Ne ae Se RRO eR Tsien Se 0 RSAM bs Mchercmmontenis cat Kod 25
DP Ree Bi Re Ay PRB eras ate bcs WGA Ewa lives Cb Serbs WNIT RS 60
a MOE goog avi eee tees eee re 73
RW MOE Me Me VE See hanly ai cia nly $5 aie Miva aoa Oe wks iad 93
RPDMIGU OE GIONIN ce tics bey stink ee SS oa he UN een 97
SO OE SD ONIN FI oc cnet ccenevsuvcesvers 108
WASHINGTON, D. C.
June, 1945
men
RR OEE PR dy OTE ER POR CAO nt Vie anette a ~~ <7 a ~ a Ee Ae eae -
In cooperation with national conservation of wood
pulp, by order of the Company, this pamphlet
is printed on non-critical Eeusta flax paper
mac at . - ee tae eee
RS aie a ae « ~
OOK ee RAO EN Oe ore) etn.
PLAN OF REORGANIZATION OF ST. LOUIS-SAN FRAN-
CISCO RAILWAY COMPANY APPROVED BY THE COM-
MISSION IN ITS ORDER OF JULY 4, 1944, AND BY THE
COURT, IN ITS ORDER ENTERED APRIL 10, 1945.
Distribution of cash and new securities per $1,000 of present bonds with accrued
interest
—_-
First Second Preferred Common
stock
i RR Be inc encncnnetcnscuecasentescacns $61.
. 34 $733 $267 |.........---].-.-----2055
Prior lien, Series A, 4S.................-.+-+- 15. 36 219 171 6. 67
Prior lien, series B, 5’s...............-.--.++- 25. 39 233 182 353 7.10
Consolidateds, Series A, 4\4's peenccnsceseenec 21.05 221 158 174 3.48
Consolidateds, series B, 6’s................-- 36. 22 243 174 191 3. 83
1See hereinafter in plan for the treatment of the creditor banks.
Time of consummation of the plan—The plan shall be consummated
by the issue and delivery of the new securities provided for in the plan
as soon as practicable after confirmation of the plan and the reorganiza-
tio managers shall publish, as directed by the court, notice of the
date as of which the new securities are to be or shall have become avail-
able for delivery. The court on application of the reorganization man-
agers shall, in the light of the date or dates as of which the delivery of
the properties to the reorganized company, the execution of the new
mortgages, and the issue and the delivery of the new securities have
been, or are expected to be, accomplished, by order determine a con-
venient and appropriate date for giving effect to the plan (such date
being herein called the consummation date). The debtor shall be dis-
charged upon the consummation date from all its obligations other than
claims to be paid or to be assumed by the reorganized company, as here-
inafter provided, and all mortgage bonds, notes, certificates and shares
of stock, and other obligations of the debtor or enforceable against the
debtor or its property, other than as aforesaid, shall, on and after the
consummation date, become void and unenforceable against the debtor
or its suecessors or their property. Prior to the consummation date,
however, the plan shall not affect any claims of creditors, and any
distribution of cash prior to the consummation date shall be in respect
of the old securities. The new securities shall be dated as of the first
day of the calendar month in which the consummation date falls, or,
if interest accruing on the unpaid principal of the Fort Scott bonds
outstanding and pledged at 4 percent per annum from December 31,
1943, to said date shall not have been paid by cash distributions as
hereinafter provided, to the latest date to which such interest shall
have been paid.
The consummation of the plan shall not require any retroactive change
in the operations of the bankruptcy trustees or in their accounts or
in the reports made to the Commission or in any other reports or
returns for the period prior to the consummation date.
Reorganized company.—All property of the debtor, and of its trustees
appointed in the proceedings for its reorganization, shall be trans-
to
ST. LOUIS-S. F. RY. CO, REORGANIZATION
3 ferred to a new corporation, or, in the discretion of the reorganization
managers with the approval of the court, shall be retained by, or trans-
: ferred to, the debtor. As herein used, the term ‘‘reorganized company”’
means the corporation, whether the debtor or the new corporation,
which shall issue the securities herein provided for. The reorganized
company, if not the debtor, shall be incorporated under the laws of
such State as the reorganization managers, with the approval of the
court, shall determine, the laws of any other State to the contrary not-
withstanding. If the court shall so direct, there shall also be trans-
ferred to the reorganized company all or any part of the property of
any wholly owned subsidiary of the debtor, and any securities of such
subsidiary may, in such event, be canceled; if there shall be so trans-
ferred to the reorganized company all or any part of the property
of any wholly owned subsidiary of the debtor owning or operating
railroad properties in the State of Texas, the reorganized company
shall have its general offices at such place as the court may direct,
the laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding. Any transfer
of property from any subsidiary to the reorganized company may be
effected by merger, consolidation, transfer of assets, or any other
means approved by the reorganization managers. All such transfers
shall be made subject to and in accordance with the plan.
New capitalization—tThe capitalization of the reorganized company
upon consummation of the plan shall be substantially as shown below,
subject to variation (@) by reason of payment or reduction of equip-
ment obligations or the incurring of additional equipment obligations,
and (b) to the extent necessary to avoid the issue of scrip in amounts
not expressible in even dollars or even hundredths of a share:
Amount
Equipment obligations, undisturbed (as of January 1,
W944) occcccceccccccessccceessenssneneeeennseensenseneaesenssannenenneensensenseeseeeneens $ 2,986000
First-mortgage, series A, 4-percent bONAS .......csseeeeserreees 73,385,342
Second-mortgage, series A, convertible 44o-percent income
ROURD wecacccccccccecscersscesccsreccvecensscncsecencnncassecesenesousanccncensensteneseacees 47,549,826
Preferred stock, series A, 5 percent, par value $100 a
QTE sccercciercncsiscarsiccesivcceccccsssecacceccnssenscabennesscnntecnsesvagenceseatecsenss 61,859,782
Common stock without par value, 1,241,158 shares stated
At PFO a Shave oo... cccccccercsecesesssseeesesenenerseanansnenaesenanenensesenens 62,057,858
OD ea cisweicsiccsivsnicinssascsestesentrcstarcertssncctnechusensbentonnen 247,838,808
Disposition of old securities. —Upon consummation of the plan and
the issue and distribution of new securities as herein provided, all
mortgage bonds, notes, and other securities and indebtedness of the
debtor (except equipment obligations which remain undisturbed) out-
standing or held by the bankruptcy trustees, ineluding any of such
securities pledged, all mortgage bonds, notes, certificates and shares
of stock, and other securities and indebtedness of St. Louis and San
Francisco Railway Company or St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad
Company (other than $1,000, principal amount, trust-mortgage bonds,
due 1987, of St. Louis and San Francisco Railway Company), and all
mortgage bonds, notes, certificates and shares of stock, and other securi-
ties and indebtedness of Kansas City, Memphis and Birmingham Railroad
PLAN OF REORGANIZATION 3
Company or the Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railway Company
outstanding or held by the bankruptcy trustees, including any of such se-
eurities pledged, shall be surrendered to the reorganization managers
and canceled, and all the mortgages on properties acquired or to be
acquired under the plan by the reorganized company (other than the
mortgages created pursuant to the plan) shall be satisfied of record
and canceled. Upon consummation of the plan, the reorganization
managers may, with the approval of the court, cause to be canceled all
mortgage bonds, notes, shares and certificates of stock, and other se-
eurities and indebtedness of predecessor and constituent corporations
of the debtor, and all mortgage bonds, notes, shares and certificates of
stock, and other securities and indebtedness of wholly owned subsidiaries
of the debtor, the properties of which are acquired under the plan by
the reorganized company, and whether such mortgage bonds, notes,
shares and certificates of stock, and other securities and indebtedness,
in any of the above cases, are then held by the bankruptcy trustees
or are in pledge, and procure the dissolution of any such corporations
which shall not own any property upon consummation of the plan.
First-mortgage bonds.—The new first-mortgage bonds shall be se-
cured by a new, open, first mortgage constituting a first lien, subject
only to the liens of equipment-trust obligations or other obligations for
the deferred or serial payment of all or a part of the purchase price
of equipment (herein called equipment obligations), on all properties
and assets, including securities and leaseholds, owned by the reorganized
company upon consummation of the plan and, subject to liens and mort-
gages in existence at the time of acquisition and to such purchase-
money liens and mortgages as may be permitted by the first mortgage
(including equipment obligations), upon all property acquired by the
reorganized company after reorganization, except such property, if
any, (whether owned upon consummation of the plan or thereafter
acquired), as the reorganization managers with the approval of the
court may determine to exclude; provided however, that (a) if the
reorganized company shall acquire the properties of any other company
(ether than a subsidiary wholly owned at the time of consummation
of the plan) constituting a class 1 earrier, such properties shall not be
subject to the lien of the first mortgage unless they are lien properties
as defined below and (b) if the reorganized company shall be con-
solidated with, or merged into, or shall sell its assets substantially as
an entirety to, any other class 1 carrier (other than a subsidiary wholly
owned at the time of consummation of the plan), no properties thereto-
fore owned or thereafter acquired by such other company, or by the
company resulting from such consolidation, shall be subject to the
lien of the first mortgage except such thereof as shall be lien properties
as defined below. Lien properties, for the purpose of the next preced-
ing sentence, shall include all properties which shall be appurtenant
or incident to properties subject to the lien of the first mortgage or
which shall consist of any line of railroad, or securities representing
control thereof, which will displace or otherwise adversely affect the
use thereof made of, or have the effect of diverting traffic from, any
line of railroad then subject to the first mortgage, or which shall be
within the maintenance or replacement covenants of the first mortgage
or which shall be acquired in whole or in part by the use of first-
:
an en a |
<=
EO ORR LES) UAE NT OPE NCO BAST IG OIE TE REED OTIS PERE FONT TE RR I FR OT ——er —
4 ST. LOUIS-S. F. RY. CO. REORGANIZATION
mortgage bonds or second-mortgage bonds, or moneys deposited under
3 the first mortgage or the secoad mortgage.
i The first mortgage shall contain a convenant that the reorganized
company will at all times keep the mortgaged property supplied with
; such amount of motive power, rolling stock, and equipment (on which
4 the first mortgage shall constitute a first lien subject only to such liens
F in the nature of purchase-money liens, including equipment obliga-
tions, as may be permitted by the terms thereof), and maintain the
3 same in such condition, as may be necessary for the efficient and eeo-
nomical operation of the mortgaged property.
: First-mortgage bonds may be issued from time to time without limit
F as to aggregate amount in different series, subject to such limitations
and restrictions as may be specified in the first mortgage, payable on
such date or dates, in such denominations, bearing interest at such
rates, and containing such provisions in regard to sinking funds, re-
demption, conversion, taxes, place or places, and money or moneys of
payment and registration, and having such other characteristics as may
be prescribed by the board of directors of the reorganized company at
the time of issue, but, with respect to the lien of the first mortgage,
* all equally secured except in respect of any sinking fund created for
the benefit of any particular series.
First-mortgage bonds, series A, shall not be limited in authorized
principal amount, and shall be issued, on consummation of the plan,
in the amount necessary to carry out the terms of the plan.
First-mortgage bonds, series A, shall mature 50 years after their date,
shall bear interest at the rate of 4 percent per annum payable semi-
annually, and shall be redeemable as a whole or in part at any time on
30 days’ notice, at their principal amount and accrued interest, plus
a premium of 5 percent if redeemed within 10 years from their date,
such premium decreasing by one-half of 1 percent at the beginning of
each successive subsequent 4-year period, so that there shall be no
premium on redemption during the last 4 years prior to maturity.
Bonds of series A shall be redeemable for the sinking fund at the prin-
cipal amount thereof plus accrued interest.
The first mortgage shall provide for the payment on May 1 of each
year, while any series A bonds are outstanding, of an installment of
sinking fund in an amount equal to (a) one-fourth of 1 percent of the
maximum principal amount of series A bonds theretofore at any. time
authenticated and uncanceled and (b) interest on bonds and other
obligations acquired by operation of the fund that would have been
chargeable to income if the bonds and other obligations so acquired had
remained outstanding. Such sinking-fund installments shall be pay-
able only out of net income as hereinafter provided. Amounts in said
sinking fund shall be applied to the retirement of first-mortgage bonds
or obligations collaterally secured by not less than an equal principal
amount of first-mortgage bonds, by purchase, payment or redemption,
all as shall be provided in the first mortgage. All first-mortgage bonds
or other obligations acquired by the operation of the sinking fund shall
be held in the sinking fund and continue to draw interest, which shall
be paid into the fund, so long as any series A bonds are outstanding,
but shall not be deemed outstanding for any other purpose, and no
bonds or other obligations shall be issued in lieu thereof. :
PLAN OF REORGANIZATION 5
‘The first mortgage shall provide that the board of directors of the
reorganized company may create an additional sinking fund or sinking
funds in respect of the issue of first-mortgage bonds of series other
than series A, and that any such sinking fund or sinking funds may
be subordinated to, or may rank equally and ratably with, but not
prior to, the sinking fund established in respect of the issue of bonds
of series A.
First-mortgage bonds, in addition to those to be issued in the re-
organization, may be authenticated from time to time, with all requisite
approval of public regulatory authority, as follows:
(a) To refund first-mortgage bonds (excluding bonds retired by
operation of any sinking fund or pursuant to elause (3) of subpara-
graph (d) of this paragraph) or obligations secured by mortgage liens
prior to the lien of the first mortgage, or obligations secured by first-
mortgage bonds to the extent so secured; or
(6) Upon the deposit of cash equal to the principal amount to be
issued; or
(c) To provide for, or to reimburse the reorganized company for,
not exceeding 75 percent of expenditures made after consummation
date which under applicable accounting rules are properly chargeable
to capital account; provided, however, that (1) the said 75 percent shall
be applied to the net amount of capital expenditures after making
deductions from gross capital expenditures to such extent and on such
basis as may be specified in the first mortgage for depreciation, amor-
tization, and retirements of roadway and structures; (2) if any prop-
erty shall be acquired subject to existing liens, the amount of addi-
tional first-mortgage bonds issuable therefor, or issuable to refund
prior-lien obligations thereon, together with the aggregate amount of
existing liens to which such property is subject, shall not exceed 75
percent of the cost thereof, including as part of such cost the amount
of such existing liens whether or not the indebtedness secured thereby
is assumed by the reorganized company; and (3) no bonds shall be
issued on the basis of the acquisition of equipment (other than equip-
ment acquired with the line or terminal by which it was owned and
operated for the purposes of such line or terminal) or on the basis
of the construction of equipment or on the basis of additions and
betterments to equipment or refund equipment obligations; or
(d) Bonds, hereinafter referred to as ‘‘emergency bonds,’’ may be
issued and sold or pledged without regard to any of the restrictions
contained in the plan, except those in this subparagraph (d), upon
resolution adopted by the vote of two-thirds of the entire number of
directors that funds are needed and cannot be raised except by sale,
exchange, or pledge of the bonds applied for; provided, however, that
(1) if all emergency bonds (or a like principal amount of other first-
mortgage bonds) are not retired and canceled within 2 years from the
date of issue, there shall thereafter, until such retirement is accom-
plished, be an additional annual sinking fund (hereinafter called the
emergency-bond sinking fund), equal to 10 percent of the maximum
principal amount of emergency bonds theretofore outstanding at any
time since the last previous time when no emergency bonds were out-
standing to be paid as hereinafter provided in the subparagraphs re-
‘S to application of available net income, and applicable in the
PE : : " : . ; TRE? eeeat +
Pa Weel er TE
Ae aa. |
|
Dsante ersten es atisc2s eh PBI NE Si A Al OA RELA isin
same manner as above provided in respect of the series A sinking fund;
(2) the amount of emergency bonds outstanding shall not exceed at
any one time $10,000,000; and (3) the reorganized company shall re-
acquire all emergency bonds (or a like principal amount of other first-
mortgage bonds outstanding or pledged) as soon as practicable, and
all such bonds so reacquired by the reorganized company shall forth-
with be surrendered to the trustee under the first mortgage for can-
celation.
The amount of emergency bonds outstanding at any time shall be
deemed to be the principal amount of first-mortgage bonds theretofore
at any time authenticated pursuant to the foregoing, less (a) the amount
of first-mortgage bonds retired and canceled (when any emergency
bonds are outstanding) under such circumstances that no first-mortgage
bonds may be issued in lieu thereof and (b) the amount of first-mortgage
bonds otherwise issuable, the privilege of issuing which shall, when any
emergency bonds are outstanding, have been irrevocably waived.
The first mortgage shall contain a covenant to the effect that no first-
mortgage bonds, other than those to be issued under the plan, shall
be sold or pledged by the reorganized company unless the board of
directors of the reorganized company shall, by resolution adopted by
two-thirds of the entire number of directors, have determined that,
in the opinion of the board, taking into account market and other
relevant conditions at the time, it is impracticable to provide the amount
of money needed (i) by the sale of second-mortgage bonds having a
suitable maturity at a price which would give a yield to maturity of
5 percent or less, or (2) by the sale of preferred stock at a price which
would give a current dividend return of 6 percent or less, or (3) by
the sale of common stock at a price which would give a current dividend
return of 6 percent or less, based on the regular dividend rate then in
effect, or, if no regular rate is in effect, based on the average rate at
which dividends have been paid during the past 12 calendar months,
or if no dividends have been paid durmg the past 12 calendar months,
based on a dividend rate of $3 per share per year.
The first mortgage shall contain a covenant that (a) the excess of
the principal amount of first-mertgage bonds at any time pledged over
the principal amount of indebtedness secured by pledge of first-mort-
gage bonds shall not exceed 10 percent of the aggregate principal
amount of all first-mortgage bonds then outstanding, including bonds
pledged but excluding bonds held in the treasury of the reorganized
company and (b) the excess of the aggregate principal amount of
first-mortgage bonds and second-mortgage bonds at any time pledged
over the principal amount of indebtedness secured by such pledge shall
not exceed 10 percent of the aggregate principal amount of all first-
mortgage bonds and second-mortgage bonds then outstanding, includ-
ing bonds pledged but excluding bonds held in the treasury of the
reorganized company.
The first mortgage shall provide, within conditions and limits to be
therein prescribed, for the modification and alteration thereof and of
any or all supplements thereto, and of the rights and obligations of the
reorganized company and of the holders of the bonds issued thereunder,
at any time, with all requisite approval of public regulatory authority,
by the concurrent action of the reorganized company and of the holders
6 ST. LOUIS-S. F. RY. CO. REORGANIZATION
of not less than two-thirds of the aggregate principal amount of bonds |
PLAN OF REORGANIZATION 7
then outstanding affected by such modification or alteration; and, with-
out limitation, such modification or alteration may specifically in-
elude procedural provision for ascertaining available net income with-
out the maintenance of separate books of account, in the event that
the reorganized company shall be merged into or consolidated or unified
with another class I carrier, whether or not a subsidiary of the reor-
ganized company; provided, however, that no such modification or
alteration shall (a) alter or impair the obligation of the reorganized
company to pay the principal of, or interest on, any bond at the time
and place and at the rate and in the currency provided therein, (b)
permit the creation by the reorganized company of any mortgage or
lien in the nature of a mortgage ranking prior to or on a parity with
the lien of the first mortgage, except as in the first mortgage other-
wise expressly provided, or (c) alter the provisions of the first mort-
gage conforming to this sentence and the next following sentence. Not-
withstanding the limitation in the foregoing clause (a) of this para-
graph, the first mortgage shall provide that the obligation of the
reorganized company to pay the principal of and/or interest on first-
mortgage bonds may, with all requisite approval of publie regulatory
authority, be modified by the concurrent action of the reorganized com-
pany and of the holders of not less than three-fourths in aggregate
principal amount of the bonds affected by such modification then out-
standing, so as to postpone the time of payment of all or any part of
such principal and/or interest; provided, however, that if the reor-
- ganization managers shall advise the court that, in their opinion, the
inclusion of the foregoing provision in the first mortgage would impair
the negotiability of the first-mortgage bonds, and that such impair-
ment would, in their opinion, be materially disadvantageous, and the
court shall so decide, the foregoing provision may be modified by the
reorganization managers to the extent necessary to prevent any im-
pairment of negotiability.
Special reserve fund.—Immediately after the consummation date the
reorganized company shall set aside in a special bank account, out of
the cash turned over to it by the bankruptcy trustees, the sum of
$500,000. Moneys from time to time in said special account (herein
ealled the special reserve fund) may be used only (1) for investment
in securities issued by the United States Government, the proceeds of
which upon payment or sale, shall be restored to the special reserve
fund; or (2) to pay fixed charges of the reorganized company; or (3)
for capital expenditures; provided, however, that no part of the special
reserve fund shall be used for payment of fixed charges or for capital
expenditures unless the board of directors shall, by resolution adopted
by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the entire board, (a) authorize
such use; (b) determine that funds necessary for payment of fixed
charges or for capital expenditures are unavailable from other sources;
and (c) in case the special reserve fund is to be used for capital ex-
penditures, determine that such capital expenditures are essential for
the safe operation of the properties of the reorganized company or
for the realization of customary standards of efficiency or economy in
the operation of such properties.
If, at any time, the sum of cash in the special reserve fund and
the principal amount of United States Government obligations in which
laste sinenialll
AES an pli 0 tas De
i be * Gib RRR OI EG il ee his OEY
Dictators otis wsienrs Perea
7
moneys in the special reserve fund are then invested (such sum
being hereinafter called the special reserve fund balance) is less
than $500,000, no dividends shall thereafter be paid on common stock
unless and until an amount equal to such deficiency shall have been
deducted from available net income which would otherwise be applica-
ble to the payment of dividends on common stock and transferred to the
special reserve fund.
Second-mortgage bonds.—The new second mortgage shall constitute
a lien, subject to the lien of the first mortgage, on all property from
time to time subject to the lien of the first mortgage.
Second-mortgage bonds may be issued from time to time without
limit as to aggregate amount in different series, subject to such limita-
tions and restrictions as may be specified in the second mortgage, pay-
able on such date or dates, in such denominations, bearing interest at
such rates, and containing such provisions in regard to accumulations
of interest, sinking funds, redemption, conversion, taxes, place or places,
and money or moneys of payment and registration, and having such
other characteristics, as may be prescribed by the board of directors
of the reorganized company at the time of issue, but, with respect to
the lien of the second mortgage, all equally secured except in respect
of any sinking fund created for the benefit of any particular series.
No interest shall be mandatorily payable on second-mortgage bonds,
except at maturity by expiration of the term or at redemption, other-
wise than out of available net income, as hereinafter provided. The
second mortgage shall contain provisions permitting the extension of
any first-mortgage bonds or other obligations secured by lien prior
to the lien of the second mortgage from time to time outstanding.
Series A bonds shall not be limited in authorized principal amount,
and shall be issued, on consummation of the plan, in the amount neces-
sary to carry out the terms of the plan. They shall mature 75 years
after their date, and shall bear contingent interest at the rate of 4%
percent per annum payable, as in the following paragraph hereof pro-
vided, annually «n the first day of May in each year, and shall be
redeemable as a whole or in part at any time on 30 days’ notice, at
their principal amount plus (a) interest at the rate of 44% percent
per annum for the last preceding calendar year, if not theretofore
paid, whether or not earned, (b) all unpaid accumulated interest for
prior years, and (c) interest at the rate of 444 percent per annum from
the end of the last preceding calendar year to the redemption date.
The series A bonds shall have a conversion privilege and be entitled
to the benefits of a sinking fund as hereinafter provided.
Interest on the bonds of series A accruing for each calendar year
shall, up to the limits of accumulation hereinafter specified, become
absolutely owing as a debt on December 31 in such year, but shall be
payable on May 1 of the next succeeding year or thereafter as pro-
vided below. Such interest shall be mandatorily payable, except as
herein provided, only when the available net income of the reorganized
company is sufficient for the payment thereof upon the application of
such available net income as hereinafter provided. All interest not
paid because of the limitation in the last preceding sentence shall
accumulate up to the maximum accumulation of 18 percent, but not
beyond. Interest accruing in any year which is paid on May 1 in
8 ST. LOUIS-S. F. RY. CO. REORGANIZATION
ea
PLAN OF REORGANIZATION 9
the next succeeding year shall not be included in calculating the 18
percent. Accumulated interest shall be mandatorily payable (a) when-
ever, and to the extent that available net income is sufficient for the
payment thereof upon the application of such available net income
as hereinafter provided, in which case such amount shall be paid on
the next following May 1, or (b) in any event, whether earned or
not, at the maturity or on redemption of the second-mortgage bonds.
Upon the maturity of the series A bonds, whether by acceleration or
otherwise, there shall be paid (a) interest at the rate of 444 percent
per annum for the last preceding calendar year, if not theretofore
paid, whether or not earned, (b) all unpaid accumulated interest for
prior years, and (c) interest at the rate of 442 percent per annum from
the end of the last preceding calendar year to the date of maturity.
All interest after maturity shall be a fixed obligation. The board
of directors may, in its discretion, at any time pay any interest on
second-mortgage bonds, which is at the time accumulated or cur-
rently accrued but not mandatorily payable, out of any funds law-
fully available therefor, but only if the board of directors shall, by
resolution adopted by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the entire
board, determine that the funds to be used for such payment are not
needed for additions and betterments that are necessary or desirable
for the safe operation of the properties of the reorganized company
or for the realization of customary standards of efficiency or economy
in the operation of such properties.
To compensate for any reduction of interest payments on the second-
mortgage bonds through utilization of subparagraph (1) hereinafter
set forth relating to the application of available net income, the
second mortgage shall contain a covenant substantially to the effect
that if the amount of interest paid or payable on second-mortgage
bonds shall have been reduced by any appropriation from available
net income for capital expenditures pursuant to said subparagraph
(1), the amount of any such reduction shall be supplied from avail-
able net income and distributed pro rata among holders of outstanding
second-mortgage bonds, in addition to any other interest required to
be paid thereon, before any dividend shall be paid on preferred stock
or common stock.
Until ealled for redemption, the bonds of series A shall, at the option
of the holders, be convertible into shares of common stock, as at the
time constituted, at any time within 5 years after the date of such
bonds, at the rate of 30 shares for each $1,000 principal amount of
such bonds, and at any time thereafter at the rate of 25 shares for
each $1,000 principal amount of such bonds.
The second mortgage shall provide for an annual sinking-fund pay-
ment for series A bonds to be made on each May 1 so long as any
series A bonds are outstanding, from available net income as herein-
after provided, in an amount equal to one-half of 1 percent of the
maximum principal amount of series A bonds theretofore at any time
authenticated and unecaneceled. The series A sinking fund shall be
applied from time to time to the retirement of series A bonds by
purchase or redemption, as provided in the second mortgage. All
bonds of series A purchased or redeemed by operation of the sinking
fund shall be forthwith canceled, and uo bonds shall! be issued in lieu
thereof.
PT LAIRBR LOREEN his
EE
Wages ae
.
AREER PEL ATER Lt
Kis
3
4
§
3
4
4
Z
4
“
4
|
3
i
§
i
in
Bd
10 cit, LOUIS-S. F. RY. CO. REORGANIZATION
Sinking funds may be provided for other series of second-mortgage
bonds, and any such sinking fund or sinking funds may be sub-
ordinated to, or may rank equally and ratably with, but not prior to,
the sinking fund for the bonds of series A.
Second-mortgage bonds, in addition to those to be issued in the
reorganization, may be authenticated from time to time, with all
requisite approval of public regulatory authority, as follows:
(1) For the purposes and subject to the restrictions contained in
the plan in respect of the issue of additional first-mortgage bonds, to
the extent that first-mortgage bonds are not issued for such purposes;
provided, however, that no emergency bonds may be issued under the
second mortgage; and (2) to refund second-mortgage bonds (exclud-
ing bonds retired by operation of any sinking fund) or obligations
secured by second-mortgage bonds, to the extent so secured.
The second mortgage shall contain a covenant to the effect that no
bonds, other than those to be issued under the plan, may be sold or
pledged by the reorganized company unless the board of directors
of the reorganized company, by resolution adopted by two-thirds of
the entire number of directors, shall have determined that in the
opinion of the board, taking into account market and other relevant
conditions at the time, it is impracticable to provide the amount of
money needed (1) by the sale of preferred stock at a price which
would give a current dividend return of 6 percent or less, or (2) by
the sale of common stock at a price which would give a current divi-
dend return of 6 percent or less, based on the regular dividend rate
then in effect, or, if no regular rate is in effect, based on the average
rate at which dividends have been paid during the past 12 ealendar
months, or if no dividends have been paid during the past 12 calendar
months, based on a dividend rate of $3 per share per year.
The second mortgage shall contain a covenant that (a) the excess
of the principal amount of second-mortgage bonds at any time pledged
over the principal amount of indebtedness secured by pledge of sec-
ond-mortgage bonds shall not exceed 10 percent of the aggregate
principal amount of all second-mortgage bonds then outstanding,
ineluding pledged second-mortgage bonds but excluding second-mort-
gage bonds held in the treasury of the reorganized company and (b)
the excess of the aggregate principal amount of first-mortgage bonds
and second-mortgage bonds at any time pledged over the principal
amount of indebtedness secured by such pledge shall not exceed 10
percent of the aggregate principal amount of all first-mortgage bonds
and second-mortgage bonds then outstanding, ineluding bonds pledged
but excluding bonds held in the treasury of the reorganized company.
The second mortgage shall contain a covenant with regard to the
maintenance and replacement of equipment similar to the correspond-
ing covenant in the first mortgage heretofore described and shall also
contain appropriate covenants to carry out the provisions heretofore
stated relative to the special reserve fund.
The second mortgage shall provide, within conditions and limits to
be therein prescribed, for the modification and alteration thereof, and
of any or all supplements thereto, and of the rights and obligations
of the reorganized company and of the holders of bonds issued there-
under, at any time by the concurrent action of the reorganized com-
pany and of the holders of not less than two-thirds of the aggregate
ee ie ee | i i ee ee ee
2 EIS eI SAH LN
PLAN OF REORGANIZATION 11
principal amount of bonds then outstanding affected by such modifi-
cation or alteration; and, without limitation, such modification or
alteration may specifically include procedural provision for ascertain-
ing available net income without the maintenance of separate books
of account, in the event that the reorganized company shall be merged
or consolidated or unified with another class I carrier, whether or not
a subsidiary of the reorganized company ; provided, however, that no
such modification or alteration shall (a) alter or impair the obligation
of the reorganized company with respect to the determination and
application of income available for interest on the second-mortgage
bonds (except as herein specifically provided) or with respect to the
payment of the prineipal amount of or accumulated interest on any
second-mortgage bonds at the time and place, at the rate and in the
currency provided therein, (b) permit the creation by the reorganized
company of any mortgage or lien in the nature of a mortgage ranking
prior to or on a parity with the lien of the second mortgage, except
as in the second mortgage otherwise expressly provided, or (c) alter
the provisions of the second mortgage conforming to this sentence
and the next following sentence. Notwithstanding the limitations in the
foregoing clauses (a) and (dD) of this paragraph, the second mortgage
shall provide that the obligation of the reorganized company referred
to in said elause (a) may be modified, and mortgages or liens referred
to in said clause (b) may be created, with all requisite approval of
publie regulatory authority, by the concurrent action of the reorgan-
ized company and of the holders of not less than three-fourths in
aggregate principal amount of the bonds affected by such change then
outstanding; provided, however, that if the reorganization managers
shall advise the court that, in their opinion, the inclusion in the second
mortgage of a provision permitting modification of the obligation of
the reorganized company referred to in said elause (a) would impair
the negotiability of the second-mortgage bonds, and that such impair-
ment would, in their opinion, be materially disadvantageous, and the
eourt shall so decide, the provision permitting such modification may
be modified by the reorganization managers to the extent necessary
to prevent any impairment of negotiability.
If the applicable accounting rules shall have been so changed as
substantially to reduce the amounts of cash available for capital ex-
penditures from sources other than available net income, the provisions
of the second mortgage may be modified (notwithstanding the limita-
tions in the last preceding paragraph) by the concurrent action of
the reorganized company and of the holders of not less than a majority
of the aggregate principal amount of bonds then outstanding, so as
to permit the deduction of amounts for capital expenditures before
determining available net ineome or to increase the appropriation for
capital expenditures permitted by subparagraph (1), hereinafter set
forth relating to application of available net income.
Ascertainment and disposition of available net income.—Available
net income shall be determined for each calendar year that begins
after the calendar year in which the new securities shall be dated,
and for that part of the calendar year in which the new securities
shall be dated following the date of the new securities (such part of
such ealendar year being hereinafter included within the term calen-
dar year). Available net income for each such calendar year shall be
a sac |
ERNE he,
Pipa tet
eae
eae a RES
MEPL ASE SGOT pt CERES POE BE
> aN Nana bate Ryo:
-
Scams Se asa io eS BAI LIL a a I OB Ree a +
i
12 sf. LOUIS-S. FP. RY. CO. REORGANIZATION
determined by deducting all fixed charges of the reorganized com-
pany and its wholly owned railway subsidiaries accruing during such
calendar year from the consolidated income of the reorganized com-
pany and its wholly owned subsidiaries available for fixed charges
for such calendar year (determined in accordance with the applicable
accounting rules, subject to the adjustments specified in the next
sueceeding paragraph). If any period for which available net income
is to be determined precedes the consummation date, the consolidated
railway operating revenues, and the consolidated income available for
fixed charges, to be used for the ascertainment of available net income
for such period shall be those of the bankruptcy trustees and their
wholly owned railway subsidiaries for such period.
Available net income shall be ascertained for each calendar year,
as the accounts shall be stated on the books of the reorganized com-
pany when its accounts are closed for such calendar year, without
adjustments, except that (1) no amounts shall be charged to operat-
ing expenses for retirements of nondepreciable property, (2) any
adjustment necessary to correct the income account for any prior year
shall be made by appropriate entries which may either be made in
the accounts of the current year and/or, in the discretion of the board
of directors of the reorganized company, and subject to the approval
of the Commission or such other governmental agency as may at the
time have jurisdiction over the accounts of the reorganized company,
may be made in whole or in part in the accounts of any subsequent
year or years, and any such debits or credits to adjust income in prior
years shall be treated as income items for the year in which entered
on the books, whether cleared through income or profit and loss
accounts and (3) if, in respect of any calendar year, the available net
income (ascertained in all cases after the adjustments provided in
this paragraph) is a deficit, the amount of such deficit shall be carried
forward and be deducted in determining available net income for the
sueceeding calendar year or calendar years until such deficit (or
accumulated or remaining deficits) be extinguished by earnings which,
in the absence of such deficit or deficits, would be available net income.
Available net income for each calendar year shall be applied on the
May 1 next following the end of such ealendar year to the following
purposes and in the following order:
(1) To provide for such appropriation for capital expenditures, not
exceeding the excess of (a) $500,000 or 1 percent of consolidated rail-
way operating revenues of the reorganized company and its wholly
owned railway subsidiaries for such calendar year, whichever shall be
greater, over (b) the special reserve fund balance as of the end of
such calendar year, as the board of directors may, by resolution
adopted by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the entire board,
determine to be unavailable from other sources, and necessary to
provide for capital expenditures in such ealendar year or the next
succeeding calendar year which, in the opinion of the board of diree-
tors, are essential for the safe operation of the properties of the
reorganized company, or for the realization of customary standards
of efficiency or economy in the operation of such properties.
(2) To the payment of all sinking-fund installments payable for
any first-mortgage bonds, including the emergency-bond sinking fund,
if then payable, such payments to be made equally and ratably except
PLAN OF REORGANIZATION 13
to the extent that, as hereinabove provided, sinking funds for series
other than series A shall have been subordinated.
(3) To the payment of interest on the then outstanding second-
mortgage bonds (not including any thereof held in any sinking fund),
and any accumulations thereof. No interest need be paid if it would
amount to less than one-quarter of 1 percent. Any excess available
for such interest, but not paid because of the last preceding sentence,
shall be reserved and added to the income available for interest on
the second-mortgage bonds for the next sueceeding calendar year. In
case more than one series of seecond-mortgage bonds is outstanding,
and in any calendar year the amount available for the purposes speci-
fied in this subparagraph (3) is less than all interest (including un-
paid accumulated interest) owing on all such bonds, the amount
available shall be prorated among the several series in proportion to
the respective interest rates thereon until second-mortgage bonds
of each series shall have received an amount equal to 1 year’s interest
thereon, any then remaining balance to be prorated among the several
series in proportion to the balance owing thereon respectively.
(4) To the payment of all sinking-fund installments payable for
any second-mortgage bonds, such payments to be made equally and
ratably except to the extent that, as hereinabove provided, sinking
funds for series other than series A shall have been subordinated.
(5) To the payment of any interest required to be paid on second-
mortgage bonds pursuant to the provisions of the paragraph herein-
above set forth relative to compensation for any reduction in interest
payments on the second-mortgage bonds through utilization of sub-
paragraph (1) of this series of subparagraphs.
(6) To any proper corporate purpose, ineluding, if, when, and as
declared by the board of directors of the reorganized company, the
payment of dividends on the preferred stock and the common stock,
subject to the relative rights of the two classes of stock, and to the
provisions of the last paragraph hereinabove set forth relative to the
special reserve fund.
If the date of the new securities shall be other than January 1,
aceruals of sinking-fund installments payable on May 1 of the next
sueceeding calendar year shall be computed on a proportionate basis.
Dividends may be paid on stock of either class, subject to the rela-
tive rights of the two classes of stock and to the provisions hereof
for a special reserve fund, out of the income of any calendar year
prior to the close of such calendar year if, but only if, prior to the
declaration of such dividends, the board of directors shall have deter-
mined that the available net income for such year applicable for the
purposes specified in the foregoing subparagraphs (1), (2), (3), (4),
and (5) will be more than sufficient to pay the amounts payable out
of such available net income pursuant to said subparagraphs, and such
amounts shall have been deposited in trust for the purposes specified
in said subparagraphs.
Preferred stock.—The amount of the new preferred stock to be
originally authorized shall be fixed by the reorganization managers
without limitation by the amount of the initial issue and there shall be
issued upon reorganization an amount of preferred stock, series A,
sufficient to carry out the plan. Additional preferred stock of any
< - wre “aS
Y 14 ST. LOUIS-S. F. RY. CO, REORGANIZATION |
a
™~
series may, subject to the conditions hereinafter stated, be issued
: from time to ‘time for any proper corporate purpose.
: The new preferred stock, series A, shall be of the par value of $100
} per share, and shall entitle the holders thereof in preference to the
holders of the common stock to receive dividends, when and as de-
elared by the board of directors, at the rate of 5 percent per annum
out of the available net income for any calendar year. Dividends
on the preferred stock, series A, shall be cumulative in respect of
each calendar year, but only to the extent that available net income
for such calendar year is applicable to dividends on the preferred
stock, series A, under the provisions hereof (or would have been so
applicable except for any deduction made from such available net
income pursuant to subparagraphs (1) or (5) relative to the appli-
cation of available net income), but is not distributed. If there are
outstanding shares of preferred stock of different series of the same
class, (@) the earnings of each calendar year applicable to dividends
thereon shall, for the purpose of determining dividend accumulations,
be apportioned among the respective series in proportion to the divi-
dend rates on such series, respectively, and (b) all amounts paid in
dividends on the preferred stock shall be prorated among the several
; series in proportion to the respective dividend rates thereon until pre-
: ferred stock of each series shall have received an amount equal to
1 year’s dividends thereon, and the balance of such dividends shall
be prorated among the several series in proportion to the remaining
accumulated unpaid dividends thereon, respectively. No dividend
shall be paid on the common stock in any calendar year unless all
7 accumulated unpaid dividends for ll prior calendar years shall have
been paid or declared and set apart for payment on the preferred
stock, and, if the dividend on the common stock shall be payable out
of available net income for the year in which payment is made, unless
full dividends for such year at the stipulated dividend rate of the
respective series shall also have been paid or declared and set apart
for payment on the preferred stock.
In the event of the dissolution, winding up, or liquidation of the
reorganized company, the holders of preferred stock, series A, shall
be entitled to receive out of the assets of the reorganized company
$100 per share, together with an amount equal to all accrued, unpaid,
and aceumulated dividends, before any distribution shall be made
to the holders of common stock.
The preferred stock, series A, shall be redeemable in whole or in
part at any time on 60 days’ notice at its par value, plus an amount
equal to dividends at the rate of 5 pereent per annum, whether or
not earned, from the beginning of the last preceding calendar year
to the redemption date, less any dividends paid for that period, plus
all accumulated dividends for preceding years. The holders of pre-
ferred stock, series A, shall have no preemptive right to subscribe to
any shares of stock of any class or to securities convertible into stock
of any class.
The preferred stock, series A, shall be convertible, at the option of
the holder, at any time on or before 15 days prior to the date as of
which such stock shall have been called for redemption, into common
stock as at the time constituted, at the rate of two shares of common
stock for one share of preferred stock.
ee eae ne > eN
x
PLAN OF REORGANIZATION 15
The certifieate of incorporation of the reorganized company shall
provide in substance that the reorganized company shall not, without
the vote or consent of the holders of at least two-thirds in par value
of the outstanding preferred stock, series A, (a) amend the certificate
of incorporation of the reorganized company or any certificate
amendatory thereof or supplemental thereto so as to alter or change
adversely the preterences and voting rights to which the holders of
preferred stock, series A, are entitled thereunder, (b) create any
additional stock ranking either as to assets or dividends in priority
to or on a parity with the preferred stock, or (¢) issue any of the
shares of preferred stock which shall be originally authorized for any
purpose other than to carry out the plan or to refund outstanding
obligations or to provide for expenditures chargeable to capital
account,
Holders of preferred stock shall be entitled to one vote a share on
all matters, except that in elections of directors, which shall be by
cumulative voting, each holder of stock of any class shall be entitled
to as many votes a share as the number of directors for which the
stock of such class has at the time the right to vote. Until regular
dividends at the full rate borne by the preferred stock shall have
been paid for 3 consecutive years on all outstanding preferred stock
and thereafter, so long as there shall be any accumulated dividends on
the preferred stoek which shall have remained unpaid for 12 months
after the close of the year in respect of whieh such dividends shall
have accumulated, the holders of the preferred stock, voting as a
class, shall be entitled to elect a majority of the directors of the
reorganized company and the holders of the common stock, voting
as a elass, shall be entitled to elect the remaining directors. If, after
the holders of the preferred stock shall have ceased to be entitled to
elect a majority of the board of directors, (a) the reorganized com-
pany shall fail for 3 consecutive calendar years to pay full dividends
on all preferred stock at the time outstanding or (b) accumulated
unpaid dividends on the preferred stock of any series shall amount to
10 pereent or more, the holders of the preferred stock shall again be
entitled to elect a majority of the board of directors until full current
dividends shall have been paid on the preferred stock for 3 econseeu-
tive years, and all dividends accumulated up to the end of the last
preceding calendar year shall have been paid. Holders of the pre-
ferred stock, voting as a class, shall have the right to elect not less
than two directors after default of the equivalent of six quarterly
dividends.
Subject to the foregoing provisions relative to preferred stock, the
certifieate of incorporation will permit the authorization and issuance
of additional preferred stock of sueh series and amounts, with such
par value and entitled to such dividends, voting rights, priority,
redemption, conversion, and other special privileges and restrictions
as the board of directors may determine in its diseretion.
Common stock—-The number of shares of common stock to be origi-
nally authorized shall be fixed by the reorganization managers with-
out limitation by the amount of the initial issue, and there shall be
issued upon reorganization a number of shares of common stock suffi-
cient to carry out the plan. All the common stock shall be without
*
Se LA MEL II IOC
a MBB LCI NEBINED iD
nein sete Ta hee
16 ST. LOUIS-S. F. RY. CO, REORGANIZATION
par value. The necessary number of shares of common stock shall he
reserved for conversion of the second-mortgage bonds, series A, and
the preferred stock, series A, to be issued under the plan.
Holders of common stoek shall be entitled to one vote a share on
all matters except that (@) directors shall be elected by cumulative
voting as aforesaid and (b) holders of preferred stock may be entitled
to elect stated proportions of the board of directors by separate
class vote as provided above.
So far as permitted by law, any vote or consent by the holders of
common stock authorizing the issuance of additional shares of stock
of any class or of securities convertible into stock of any class may
waive, on such terms and conditions, if any, as may be specified in
such vote or consent, the preemptive right of all the holders of
shares of common stock to subseribe to such additional shares or
securities.
TREATMENT OF EXISTING SECURITIES AND CLATMS
Holders of outstanding bonds of the several elasses shall receive,
respectively for each $1,000 principal amount thereof, cash and new
securities approximately in the amounts specified below (the amounts
of cash specified being herein ealled the eash allocations) :
New securities to be issued
Old securities Cash Common
allocations | First mort-} Income | Preferred ——
gage 4's 44's stoc! stated at
as
ACD. . ocnacenhiins sabte+=5s0d0useunse $61. 34 $733 | ee ee
Prior lien, series A... ..............--.-.--- 15. 36 219 71 $332 $333.8
Prior lien, er ee 25. 39 233 182 353 355.0
Consolidated, series A . 21.05 221 1m 174 174.6
Consolidated, Pectuledienccetiadeated 36. 22 243 174 191 191.9
The new securities may be issued in temporary form in the first
instance or interim certifieates may be issued therefor. Serip may be
issued and distributed in lieu of fractions of a bond or share of stock.
Sueh serip shall be nondividend bearing or non-interest-bearing and
nonvoting, but shall be exchangeable within 5 years after the eonsum
mation date for new securities (or interim certificates therefor) whey
presented in proper multiples upon terms and conditions approved,
by the reorganization managers.
The bank creditors or their transferees shall receive, respectively,
cash and new securities approximately in the amounts specified below,
being the cash and new securities allocable to the collateral held by
them, respectively :
PLAN OF REORGANIZATION V7
New securities to be issued
Cash alloca- rs Comenn
tions rst Income Preferred Seer ©
t iD no-par value
— we i}4's stock stated at
$50 a share
Chase National Bank ........ ..| $151, 526.37 |$1, 016, 590. 50 $727,929 | $799, 048. 50 $801, 140.00
Quaranty Trust Company. -... S56, 403,75 379, 687. 50 271, 875 298, 437. 50 299, 219.00
Bankers Trust Co 22, 637. 50 151, 875.00 108, 750 119, 375.00 119, 687. 50
Bank and Trust
—" ov 22, 637. 50 151, 875. 00. 108, 750 119, 375. 00 119, 687. 50
First ‘National Bank in StL Vouis. 22. 637. 50 181, 875.00 108, 750 119, 375.00 119, 687. 50
ercantile Commerce
Mvaet Co LebRAESALen SECEREGASERRS 22. 637.50 151, 875.00 108, 750 119, 375. 00 119, 687. 50
Nothing in the plan shall restrict the right of the court to order
distributions of available cash from time to time before the consumma-
tion date or shall limit the amount of any such distributions. All
such distributions shall be divided as follows: For each $1,000,000
of distribution, the following amounts shall be paid per $1,000 bond:
On the Fort Seott bonds, $10.01; on the prior-lien bonds, series <A,
2.88, on the prior-lien bonds, series B, $3.07; on the consolidated
bonds, series A, $3.10; and on the consolidated bonds, series B, $3.41.
Cash so paid shall be credited against the cash allocations payable
under the plan. For each amount of $1,000,000 in which the aggre-
gate of such payments on the Fort Seott bonds outstanding and
pledged shall exceed the aggregate of the cash allocations payable on
such Fort Scott bonds under the plan, plus interest accruing on the
unpaid principal of such Fort Seott bonds at 4 percent per annum
from December 31, 1943, to the date of the new securities, the follow-
ing changes shall be made in the allotment of income bonds per
$1,000 bond of the existing issues.
fest Gets bands. eel eet hn CLEKKSERanebahbAGAKAs aRESATK MANS SGA Cun Ab ele
series A bonds
Prior-lien series B bonds ibs re ‘ igen
Consolidated series A bon SRE ET 3
Consolidated series B bonds... ...... -. ... 6... 65... i SP EERE RRS te SANE AET
Allocations of new securities, other than income bonds, shall not be
changed beeause of any cash distributions or reallocations of income
bonds made pursuant to these provisions.
Subject to the foregoing provisions, such distributions shall be
credited against claims and taken into account in such manner as
the reorganization managers may determine with the approval of the
court.
The interests or equities of (1) general creditors, of the debtor, (2)
holders of preferred stock of the debtor, (8) holders of common stock
of the debtor, and (4) holders of claims against the debtor entitled to
priority or preference over the claims of general creditors, but not
over any one or more of the mortgages, have no value, and nothing
shall be distributable to them.
pray ae |
YAS NO
PURE
Claims not uffected by the plan.—The equipment obligations of the
debtor and of the bankruptcy trustees, outstanding upon consumma-
tion of the plan, shall remain undisturbed, and shall be assumed by
the reorganized company. ‘The interests of the holders of such obli-
gations will not be adversely and materially affected by the plan.
Claims against the debtor entitled to priority over the respective
mortgages and claims, current liabilities, and obligations incurred by
the bankruptcy trustees during the reorganization proceedings, or by
the receiver or receivers appointed by the court in the proceedings
begun on November 1, 1932, to the extent unpaid at the date of con-
summation of the plan, shall be paid in eash or assumed by the
reorganized company (subject to any applicable statutes of limita-
tions). All such claims, liabilities, and obligations may be paid and
discharged by the reorganized company, or may be adjusted or
compromised and dealt with in such manner as may be determined by
the board of directors of the reorganized company, subject to the
approval of the court. The interests of the holders of such claims,
liabilities, and obligations will not be adversely and materially affected
by the plan.
The reorganized company shall assume liability for and shall pay
in full, in due course, any and all taxes due to the United States
from the debter or from the bankruptey trustees subject to the stat-
utes of limitations normally applicable to the assessment and collec-
tion of such taxes, without requiring proof in the reorganization pro-
ceeding of any such taxes; provided, however, that the liability of
the reorganized company for any taxes which are the subject of
litigation on the date of confirmation of the plan, or which may
become the subject of litigation on any date thereafter and prior
to the expiration of the applicable statutes of limitations, shall be
determined pursuant to law, and provided, further, that this provision
shall not be deemed to preclude the debtor, the bankruptcy trustees,
or the reorganized company from contesting the merits of any such
tax claim in the manner provided by law. The interest of the United
States as the holder of such tax claim will not be adversely and
materially affected by the plan.
The expenses of reorganization, as allowed by the court, subject to
the provisions of section 77 of the Bankruptey Act, shall be paid in
eash. The interests of the holders of claims for such expenses of
reorganization will not be adversely and materially affected by the
plan.
All eontraets made by the bankruptey trustees pursuant to their
duties as such trustees, and not fully performed, and all executory
contracts made by the debtor and not disaffirmed by the bankruptey
trustees prior to the consummation date, shall be assumed by the
reorganized company. The interests of the other parties to such
contracts will not be adversely and materially affected by the plan.
Since the holders of 100 shares of preferred stock of the Kansas
City, Fort Scott and Memphis Railway Company (hereinafter called
the Fort Scott Company) not owned by the debtor have not procured
a judgment of the court determining their rights. as required by the
opinion of the court dated July 25, 1942, no provision can be made
herein for such stockholders. If such stockholders shall be held to
be not barred from assertion of their claims by the lapse of time, and
co inital 5 nas a ee . Nee RNA NL - a ts ocr =
18 ST. LOUIS-S. F. RY. CO. REORGANIZATION
5
}
AIS NORD ETN A BNE ATT I ALE RI
PLAN OF REORGANIZATION 19
shall establish any claim against the debtor which the court shall
determine to be secured by a lien or charge ahead of, or to be entitled
to priority over the prior-lien mortgage, the court may direct the
reorganized company to issue to such stockholders such securities, or,
to pay to such stockholders such amount in cash, as, in the opinion
of the court will fairly represent their relative rights in respect of
such claim. In view of these provisions the interests, if any, of the
holders of said preferred stock of the Fort Scott Company will not
be adversely and materially affeeted by the plan. If such stockholders
shall fail to establish a claim, the interest or equity of such holders
has no value, and nothing shall be distributable to them.
The debtor, as reorganized, or the transferee of the property of the
debtor, in connection with any settlements of transportation accounts
between the United States and the debtor or the reorganized company,
shall be required to recognize and pay or allow for any and all sums,
determined through audit, adjustment, compromise, or litigation, as
due the United States by virtue of the provisions of section 322 of the
Transportation Act of 1940, 54 Stat. L. 955, for overpayments made
prior to the date of confirmation of a plan of reorganization, without
requiring proof thereof in this reorganization proceeding and with-
out prejudice by reason of such sums not having been proved herein,
with the same relative priority as they now have with respect to
other obligations of the debtor. The interests of the United States
as the holder of such claims will not be adversely and materially
affected by the plan.
Voting trust—A voting trust shall be created in order to assure a
stable, experienced, and impartial management during the transition
period which will follow the consummation of the reorganization and
the termination of the war. All of the preferred stock, series A, and
the common stock of the reorganized company, issued in the reorganiza-
tion, and all other voting stock thereafter issued by the reorganized
company during the continuance of said voting trust shall be de-
posited in said voting trust, and voting-trust certificates will be issued
therefor. All references in the plan to stock of the reorganized com-
pany shall, unless the context otherwise requires, be deemed to mean
voting-trust certificates for such stock.
The voting trustees shall be three in number. One voting trustee
shall be designated by the committee for the prior-lien mortgage bonds
of the debtor (hereinafter called the prior-lien committee) and one by
the committee for the consoblidated-mortgage bonds of the debtor (here-
inafter called the consolidated committee), both subject to the approval
of the court, and one voting trustee shall be designated by the court;
provided, however, that if the court shall find that at the time of desig-
nation any of the committees has ceased to hold or to represent a sub-
stantial interest in the property, the court may, in its discretion, desig-
nate, in lieu of such committee. Such voting trust shall continue for
5 years from the consummation date. The voting-trust agreement shall
provide that, if any vacaney shall occur among the voting trustees,
such vacancies shall be filled by the remaining voting trustee or voting
trustees.
Board of directors—The board of directors of the reorganized com-
pany shall consist of not less than il and not more than 17 members.
The members of the first board of directors shall be designated by the
Cea. |
GLE LOG IG PIE
“cae
Pee rremrscayerrs
‘ DS rade
ee RO Ts a
pate
20 ST, LOUIS-S. F. RY. CO. REORGANIZATION
reorganization managers with the approval of the court ; provided, how-
ever, that if the court shall disapprove any person or persons desig-
nated by the reorganization managers as a member of the board of
directors, the court, in the absence of a designation by the reorganiza-
tion managers that is acceptable to the court, may itself designate a
member or members of the board of directors in lieu of such person
or persons so disapproved.. Thereafter, the directors shall be elected
annually by the voting trustees so long as the voting trust shall continue
in effect, and thereafter by the stockholders.
Reorganization managers.—There shall be four reorganization man-
agers, of whom one shall be designated by the committee for the Fort
Seott refunding-mortgage bonds, one by the prior-lien committee, and
one by the consolidated committee, all subject to the approval of the
court, and one by the court; provided, however, that if the court shall
find that at time of designation any of the committees has ceased to
hold or to represent a substantial interest in the property, the court
may in its diseretion designate in lieu of such committee. Should any
of the parties named fail to make such designation within such time
after confirmation of the plan and notice as the court shall consider
reasonable, the court shall appoint the reorganization manager whom
such party was entitled to designate. If there be any vacancy, however
created, after the appointments are made, the successor reorganization
manager shall be appointed by the party or parties who designated
the reorganization manager whose position has become vacant, subject
to the approval of the court, or, as the case may be, by the court.
In case of failure of any party to designate any such successor within
such time as the court shall consider reasonable, such suecessor shall be
designated by the court.
Subject to any limitations of law, the reorganization managers shall
have full diseretionary power (a) to take all such action and to enter
into such arrangements, financial and otherwise, as they may deem nec-
essary or advisable in order to consummate and carry into execution
the plan; (>) to fix the compensation of trustees, depositaries, counsel
and others whose services they may employ in the execution of their
powers and of the voting trustees, which, together with their reason-
able expenses, including counsel fees, shall be paid by the reorganized
company; (¢) to incorporate the reorganized company (if it be deemed
necessary or desirable to form a new corporation) or to amend the
certificate of incorporation of the debtor, to supervise the transfer of
any properties to the reorganized company and to make agreements
and commitments for its account; (d@) to provide the method by which
creditors and other interested parties may participate in the plan; and
(e) to determine the form and provisions (so far as not otherwise
specifically provided in the plan) of the certificate of incorporation or
amendment thereto of the reorganized company, its bylaws, the new
bonds, and the mortgages under which the same shall be issued, the
voting-trust agreement and certificates, the stock certificates, scrip,
interim certificates, and any other instruments deemed by the reor.
ganization managers to be necessary or proper in connection with the
plan; (f) to make such minor adjustments in details of the plan as
they may deem advisable; and (g) to construe the plan. Any con-
struction of the plan approved by the reorganization managers on
TEN en ARNG BORO
PLAN OF REORGANIZATION 91
advice of counsel shall, subject to approval by the court, be conclusive.
With the approval of the court, the reorganization managers may make
such changes in the allotment of new securities as may be necessary
to avoid the issue of scrip in excessively small denominations. The
reorganization managers, however, shall exercise only such powers as
shall be necessary to carry out the plan in accordance with its provi-
sions, subject to the direction of the court, and the court shall approve
the form of the certificate of incorporation or amendments thereto,
bylaws, mortgages, bonds, coupons, stock certificates, voting-trust cer-
tificates, scrip, and interim certificates before they are put in use. The
reorganization managers may act by a majority of the reorganization
managers as from time to time constituted, at a meeting or in writing
without a meeting, may employ such agents, attorneys, and others
as they may deem desirable to carry out the plan, and may delegate
to others any power or discretion conferred upon them, and no re-
organization manager shall be liable for any action taken by him in
good faith or by any person employed by the reorganization managers,
except for his individual malfeasance or willful neglect. The mort-
vage trustees, transfer agents, and registrars of the new securities, and
such depositaries as may be necessary in connection with the distribu-
tion thereof, shall be appointed by the reorganization managers.
Nothing herein contained shall be construed as authorizing the re-
organization managers to solicit deposits of securities or authorizations
to represent security holders, except upon approval by the Commission
of the terms of such solicitation by further action pursuant to Section
77 (p) of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended.
Miscellaneous provisions of mortgages, et cetera—Each of the mort-
gages, certificates of incorporation, and other instruments herein pro-
vided for shall contain such provisions, in addition to those herein
specified (including, without limitation, provisions for releases of mort-
gaged property), as the reorganization managers may deem necessary
or proper, and as may be approved, where required hereby or by law,
by the Court.
In the event that the reorganized company shall be merged or eon-
solidated or unified with any other class 1 railroad, whether or not
a subsidiary of the reorganized company, then by vote or consent of
the holders of a majority in par value of the preferred stock and a
majority of the shares of common stock then outstanding, procedural
provision may be made for ascertaining available net income without
the maintenance of separate books of account, and such provision shall
be binding on all holders of stock of such classes.
The new first mortgage and the new second mortgage may contain
such provisions as the reorganization managers may approve either (1)
permitting the reorganized company, while it is not in default in the
performance of its obligations under said mortgages respectively and
during any period of grace therein specified, to use and dispose of, to
the same extent as if not subject to the lien of such mortgages respec-
tively, cash, temporary cash investments, tools, supplies, and other
current items or (2) excluding such property from the liens of said
mortgages.
Funds on deposit with mortgage trustees —Upon consummation of
the plan, all funds (except funds deposited with Old Colony Trust
nee = |
CURRIE gt: ween
PITRE ATARI
ey
pace Bee |
Ee ater rcenen
MGS Ta acai oc
NO)
22 ST, LOUIS-S. F. RY. CO. REORGANIZATION
Company or its depositary for the payment of principal and interest
on the general-mortgage bonds and income-mortgage bonds of the
Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham Railroad Company, and funds
deposited for payment, or funds or securities deposited as indemnity
in respect of the obligations referred to in the following paragraph)
on deposit with the trustees under mortgages on the property acquired
or to be acquired by the reorganized company (other than the mort-
gages created pursuant to the plan) and all collateral pledged under
such mortgages shall be surrendered to the reorganization managers for
delivery to the treasury of the reorganized company or for cancelation
as hereinbefore provided.
Payment of unpresented securities and coupons.—The bankruptcy
trustees or the reorganized company shall pay, upon presentation and
surrender, (1) all securities issued by the bankruptcy trustees or by
the debtor which shall have become due and payable prior to the con-
summation date, and shall not have been paid solely because of failure
of presentation for payment (including any of such securities issuable
in exchange for securities of St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad
Company not yet exchanged under the plan and agreement of reor-
ganization dated November 1, 1915), and any unpaid coupons appur-
tenant to any such securities, (2) $1,000, principal amount, trust-
mortgage 5-percent bond, due 1987, of St. Louis and San Francisco
Railway Company, and appurtenant coupons, (3) all coupons matured
prior to November 1, 1932 appurtenant to Fort Scott bonds, prior lien
bonds, and consolidated bonds ‘eéutstanding in the hands of the public
(excluding pledged bonds) and (4) all coupons or portions thereof that
the court shall, before consummation of the plan, have ordered to be
paid, whether before January 1, 1944, or, subject to the provisions
hereinabove set forth relative to cash distributions before the consum-
mation date, on or after January 1, 1944; provided, however, that each
such security or coupon (other than said trust bond of St. Louis and
San Franeiseo Railway Company and coupons appurtenant thereto)
shall be presented for payment within 6 years after the consummation
date, and all such securities or coupons (other than as aforesaid) not
presented for payment within such period shall become void, and all
funds then remaining on deposit for the payment thereof shall be paid
to the reorganized company.
Executing the plan by sales.—If so ordered by the court, the plan,
after it shali have been found fair and equitable, and shall have been
confirmed by the court, may be executed by a sale or sales, at not less
than fair upset prices to be fixed by the court, of all or any part of
the property of the debtor, on such conditions, including the extent
to which the sale may be free of liens or subject to prior liens or in-
terests, and in such manner, as the court may direct. Upon any such
sale or sales, the property and assets offered for sale may be purchased
for the benefit of the reorganized company by the reorganization man-
agers, and in that event there shall be applied on account of the pur-
chase price the distributive share of the proceeds of such sale of all
securities, the holders of which shall have assented to the plan, and
of the securities, though not assenting to the plan, of all classes the
holders of two-thirds of the voted claims in which shall have accepted
the plan. If the property of the debtor so offered for sale should be
PLAN OF REORGANIZATION 23
sold to others than the reorganization managers, the plan (other than
the foregoing provisions of this paragraph) shall be inoperative.
In the event of any such sale to the reorganization managers, the
reorganization managers may in their discretion sell all or any portion
of the new securities distributable under the plan in respect of se-
curities of any bondholder, if neither such bondholder nor two-thirds
of the voted claims in the class to which such bondholder belongs shall
have accepted the plan; provided, however, that any bondholder of a
class the holders of two-thirds of the voted claims in which shall not
have accepted the plan, who shall not himself have accepted the plan,
shall have the right, if he shall so notify the reorganization managers
within a period of 30 days after the confirmation of such sale, to assent
to the plan and receive the securities allocated to him under the plan
in lieu of his aliquot share of the proceeds of such sale. The proceeds
of such sale of securities, together with any other funds which, in the
judgment of the reorganization managers, are available among the
assets of the debtor's estate or of the reorganized company, may be used
to pay the portion of the purchase price payable in cash on any such
sale of properties of the debtor.
Upon any such sale, nonassenting creditors of any class the holders
of two-thirds of the voted claims in which shall not have accepted the
plan in accordance with the provisions of section 77, and/or the stock-
holders of either class shall be entitled to receive, in lieu of the securi-
ties, if any, otherwise issuable under the plan, their equitable propor-
tion of the proceeds of such sale, after deducting therefrom all expenses
of such sale and the amount which would be required to pay in full,
to all creditors whose claims equitably marshaled are prior in lien or
superior in equity to the claims of such nonassenting creditors or the
rights of such stockholders, the principal of their claims and all unpaid
interest accrued thereon to the date of such sale.
Effect of accepting the plan——Acceptance of the plan shall include
acceptance of the provisions of the new bonds, mortgages, stock cer-
tificates, certificate of incorporation or amendments thereto, voting-trust
certificates, and all instruments necessary or appropriate to the carry-
ing out of the plan, other than the orders of the court and the Com-
mission, to the same effect as though the terms of such instruments
were set forth in full herein.
Construction of plan—The construction of the plan by the court,
whether before or after the submission of the plan to creditors, shall
be final and conelusive. The court, whether before or after submission,
may cure any defect, supply any omission, or reconcile any inconsistency,
in such manner or to such extent as may be necessary or expedient in
order to carry out the plan effectively. ‘
The carrying out of the plan shall be as provided in the Bankruptcy
Act as at the time in effect.
Additional Clauses
from Commission’s Order of July 4, 1944
In addition to the provisions of the plan approved hereinbefore shown,
the Commission’s order approving the plan also ordered—
(1) That the authorization and approval herein granted by this Com-
mission are upon the condition that the journal entries covering the
PT.
te
J £5 RRS
co |
“
iia est ee
24 ST. LOUIS-S. F. RY. CO. REORGANIZATION
necessary accounting adjustments under the order will be submitted
to this Commission for approval before they are recorded on the books
of the reorganized company under the plan of reorganization herein
approved.
(2) That nothing herein contained shall be, or be construed as, a
grant of authority for the issue of any securities, assumption of obliga-
tions, transfer of any property, sale, consolidation, or merger of the
debtor’s properties, or pooling of traffic, pursuant to either the Bank-
ruptey Act or the Interstate Commerce Act, until further action by this
Commission upon confirmation of the plan by the court.
(3) That except as thus modified, the terms and conditions of said
prior orders of July 6 and November 16, 1940, shall be, and remain,
in full force and effect.
ORIGINAL REPORT OF COMMISSION 25
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION
Finance Docket No. 10008
ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY
REORGANIZATION
Submitted November 20, 1939. Decided duly 6, 1940
Plan of reorganization for the St. Louis-San Franciseo Railway
Company, pursuant to section 77 of the Bankruptey
Act, as amended, approved.'
William V. Hodges, Jesse McDonald, Martin Jacobs, and Wiliam
V. Hodges, Jr., for debtor.
Henry B. Day, Albert Hale, Eph A, Karelsen, Frederick Baum,
Edwin S. S. Sunderland, Thomas O'G. FitzGibbon, George J. Miller,
Henry W. Anderson, George D, Gibson, Robert T. Swaine, Leonard
D. Adkins, Littleton Groom, Cassius M. Clay, Florence de Haas
Dembitz, Frederick E. Baukhages, LI, D. Willard, Jr., William J.
Kane, E. G. Buckland, Jack Louis Kraus, Il, Fitzhugh MeGrew,
Ripley L. Dana, Charles J. Winkler, Jr, Frederick M, Dearborn,
Jr. A. M. Lewis, Hovey C. Clark, Curtis Heath, M. Barratt Walker,
Oreidic W. Wood, Joseph M. Hartfield, Carl BE, Newton, George W.
Martin, A. A. Berle, Jr, James B. Alley, W. Meade Fletcher, Jr.,
Fred N. Oliver, John C. Donnally, DeCoursey Fales, Merrill M.
Manning, C. S. Bates, Haughton Bell, Sterling Pierson, Alfred H.
Meyers, Ross MeLeod, Victor House, J. Kemp Bartlett, Alfred N.
Heuston, Edward H. Stiefel, Albert L. Reed, and H. Vincent Smart
for interveners.
Chester 1. Long, Samuel W. Melntosh, Jerome J. Shuman, Lawrence
Cake, Harold J. Gallagher, and Alexander B. Royce for other interested
parties.
Revort oF THE CoMMISSION
Division 4, Comaissioners Porter, Mauarvir, AND MILLER
By Division 4:
Exceptions to the report proposed by the examiners were filed, aud
the case was argued orally before us.
1. GENERAL
A. NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS; HEARINGS; INTERVENERS
The St. Louis-San Franeiseo Railway Company, a Missouri cor-
poration, hereinafter called the debter, tor the purpese ol effecting
a reorganization under seetion 77 of the Bankruptey Act, as amended,
1 Prior reports, 207 I. C. C, 623, 221 L. C. C. 199 and 251, 224 1. C. C. 29, 228 1. 0.0.
73, and 233 I. C. C. 627 and 780.
IME eo. |
TERRIER Sete te ty
26 st. LOUIS-S. F. RY. CO. REORGANIZATION
in proceedings entitled “In the Matter of St. Louis-San Francisco
Railway Company, a Corporation, im Proceedings for the Keorgan-
ization of a Railroad, No. 7004—1’’, then and now pending in the
District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of
Missouri, Eastern Division, on November 24, 1937,? filed with this
Commission for its approval a modified plan of reorganization. A
hearing on this plan, pursuant to notice, was held by the Commis-
sion on February 8, 1938, and upon request of committees represent-
ing holders of bonds ot the Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis
Railway Company, hereinafter ealled the Fort Scott, and the debtor's
prior-lien and consolidated bonds, the hearing was adjourned to
May 3, 1938. The adjourned hearing was postponed from time to
time. On October 21, 1938, the committees, pursuant to authority
granted, filed a plan of reorganization with the Commission for its
approval. The three committees urged the same provisions in most,
but not in all, instances. Further hearings, pursuant to notice,
were held by the Commission on November 1, 2, and 8, 1938. The
committees’ plan was supplemented at the hearing and modified on
initial brief, complete agreement being finally reached by the pro-
ponents, such agreement being to the plan as an entirety, however,
and not necessarily to any single provision apart from the plan
as a whole. Further references herein to the committees’ plan are
to the plan in the form reached on initial brief. Plans generally
conforming to the plan proposed by the examiners were subsequently
filed by the committees, with their exceptions, showing the changes
urged in event of an approval in general outline of the provisions
of the examiners’ plan. References hereinafter to matters urged
by the committees at variance with the committees’ plan are to
matters thus urged conditionally in the conformed plans.
In addition to the committees which represented holders of the
Fort Seott refunding-mortgage bonds, holders of the debtor’s prior-
lien bonds, and holders of the debtor’s consolidated-mortgage bonds,
hereinafter designated, respectively, the Fort Seott committee, the
prior-lien committee, and the consolidated committee, the Reconstrue-
tion Finanee Corporation and the Railroad Credit Corporation, here-
inafter sometimes called, respectively, the Finance Corporation and
the Credit Corporation, the trustees of the three mortgages men-
tioned, the trustee of the general mortgage of the Kansas City,
Memphis & Birmingham Railroad Company, hereinafter called the
Birmingham, a number of holders and representatives of holders of
bonds issued under one of the several mortgages, and others inter-
vened in the proceeding before the Commission. Each of the three
protective committees for the bondholders represents in excess of 60
Ss
2 The debtor’s petition, stating that it was unable to meet its debts as they matured
and that it desired to effect a plan of reorganization under section 77 of the Bank-
ruptey Act, as amended, was filed with the court on May 16, 1933, the debtor having
been in receivership since November 1, 1932. On May 27, 1933, the court entered an
plan of readjustment and, pursuant to notice, hearings on the plan were held by the
Commission on July 18 and 19, 1933, and December 1, 1936, concluding on the latter
date. The Commission, division 4, in its report herein, 291 T. C. C. 199, decided Mareh
17, 1937, concluded that approval at that time of any plan of reorganization of the
debtor should be refused, without prejudice to continuation of the proceedings, and
entered an order to that effect.
eee, ee ee ee a es
ORIGINAL REPORT OF COMMISSION 27
percent of the part of the respective issues outstanding in the hands
of the public. Several of the interveners, though not filing plans,
submitted evidence, filed briefs, or were heard in oral argument. The
positions taken by such interveners will be stated hereinafter follow-
ing an outline of the plans submitted.
(Superseded matter is here omitted)
C. DESCRIPTION OF DEBTOR *S PROPERTY
The St. Louis-San Francisco lines comprise a system of railroads
in the States of Missouri, Kansas, Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Ten-
nessee, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida. Points served by the
system include St. Louis, Springfield, and Kansas City, Mo.; Colum-
bus and Wichita, Kans., Tulsa and Oklahoma City, Okla., Dallas,
Fort Worth, and Quanah, Tex., Fort Smith and Blytheville, Ark.,
Memphis, Tenn., Tupelo, Miss., Birmingham, Ala., and Pensacola,
Fla. As of December 31, 1936, the debtor owned 6,561.41 miles of
track, operated 6,788.08 miles, and jointly owned and used 36.65
miles. The mileage operated includes 19.41, 37.78, 103.19, 38.98, and
19.09 miles leased from the Birmingham Belt Railroad Company,
the Butler County Railroad Company, the Jonesboro, Lake City &
Eastern Railroad Company, the Miami Mineral Belt Railroad Com-
pany, and the St. Louis, Kennett & Southeastern Railroad Company,
respectively. The Birmingham Belt Railroad Company is an operat-
ing company, and the other four are lessors only. The securities of
all five are all owned by the debtor. System lines operated sepa-
rately are the Birmingham Belt Railroad Company, which, in addi-
tion to the tracks leased to the debtor, owned 24.99 miles of yard
tracks and sidings and operated 27.62 miles, and the following lines
in the State of Texas: Quanah, Aeme & Pacifie Railway Company,
owning 128.82 miles and operating 141.51 miles; and St. Louis, San
Francisco & Texas Railway Company, hereinafter called the Texas
company, owning 158.71 miles, operating 266.76 miles, and jointly
owning and using 0.22 mile. Included in the latter operated mileage
are 107.27 miles of the Gulf, Texas & Western Railway Company, a
nonoperating company, the properties of which were leased July 1,
1930, to the Texas company and the securities of which are all
owned by the debtor. The latter lessor company was granted a
certificate on June 16, 1939, permitting abandonment of its line.
Gulf, T. & W. Ry. Co. Abandonment, 253 1. C. C. 321. The debtor
formerly owned all the capital stock and first-mortgage bonds of
the Fort Worth & Rio Grande Railway Company, which owned
221.68 miles of main and branch line tracks in Texas. This prop-
erty, with the exception of terminals at Fort Worth and certain
cattle traps, was sold March 1, 1937, to the Atchison, Topeka &
Santa Fe Railway Company, pursuant to authority granted by
division 4 on December 31, 1936, in Fort Worth & R. G. Ry. Co. Con-
trol and Operation, 217 1. C. C. 659. The terminals and cattle traps
mentioned were sold to the Texas company.
As of December 31, 1936, the debtor thus owned direetly or con-
trolled through ownership of all securities a total of 7,199.65 miles of
track and operated a total of 7,266.84 miles, including 36.87 miles of
BS eS Prin Lathes oh ea AL Na i a. ce ae “ca
28 ST. LOUIS-S. FP. RY. CO. REORGANIZATION
track jointly owned and operated. This mileage does not inelude the
mileage of the Fort Worth & Rio Grande Railway Company. Of the
mileage owned and controlled, 5,242.08 miles were first main track and
139.65 were second main track. Since the date shown, we have issued
certificates permitting the abandonment of approximately 115 miles of
the debtor’s branch lines and connecting tracks. St. Lowis-S. FP. Ry.
Co. Abandonment, 221 I. C. C. 241, St. Lowis 8. W. Ry. Co. Abandon-
ment, 224 I. C. C. 639, St. Lowis-8. F. Ry. Co. Trustees Abandonment
of Operation, 228 I. C. C. 271, and St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. Trustees
Abandonment, 228 I. C. C. 795, 233 I. C. C. 665, and 236 I. C. C, 792.
On the other hand, approximately 13.8 miles of additional line were
acquired, St. Lowis-S. FP. Ry. Co. Trustees Purchase, 239 1. C. C. 165,
The debtor owns all the securities of the Arkansas Mining & Coal
Company, Friseo Construction Company, and Frisco Refrigerator
Line, and approximately 49 and 51 percent of the securities of the
Crawford County Mining Company and the New Mexico & Arizona
Land Company, respectively. All of these are active nonrailroad com-
panies. The debtor also owns all or the majority of the securities of
10 inactive railroad corporations,® and has an interest in 7 active
operating railroad terminal companies.* The debtor owns all the
outstanding securities, except directors’ qualifying shares, of its wholly
owned system lines. The debtor uses 12.3 miles of line and the St.
Louis, San Francisco & Texas 70.12 miles of line under trackage agree-
ments. The system is in good physical condition, and no funds will
be required for rehabilitation. There is no acerued depreciation or
deferred maintenance of way and structures, except $1,287,481 accrued
on the Arkansas & Memphis Railway Bridge & Terminal Company.
3 Kansas City & Memphis Railway & Bridge Company; Kansas City, Clinton &
Springfield Railway Company; Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railway Com.
; Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham Railroad Company ; Metropolitan Rapid
t, Light & Power Company ; the Muscle Shoals, Birmingham & Pensacola Rail-
road ; Railway Construction & Improvement Company; Red River, Texas &
Southern way Company; Sapulpa & Oil Field Railroad; and the West Tulsa Belt
Railway Company. : ;
4 Birmingham Terminal Company, Kansas City Terminal Railway Company, Rock
Island-Frisco Terminal Railway Company, Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis,
Tulsa Union De ee Union Terminal Company (Dallas, Tex.), and the
Wichita Union Terminal way Company.
5 These lines and the securities of each owned by the debtor are as follows:
St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Company first-mortgage 4-percent bonds
due January 1, 1930, but extended subject to demand by trustees of the prior-tien
mortgage of the debtor, $200,000, capital stock $975,000; Paris & Great Northern
Railroad Company first-mortgage 5-percent bonds due October 1, 1987, $339,000;
Blackwell, Enid & Texas Railway Company first-mortgage bonds due January 1,
1934, $173,000; Red River, Texas & Southern Railway Company first-mortgage 4-per-
cent bonds due March 1, 1933, $815,000, eapital stock $400,000; Gulf, Texas &
Western Railway Company first-mortgage 5-pereent bonds due November 1, 1939,
$2,000,000, capital stock $500,000; Quanah, Acme & Pacific Railway Company first-
mortgage @-percent bonds due October 1, 1939, $2,915,000, capital stock $150,000;
Butler County Railroad Company capital stock $200,000; Miami Mineral Belt Rail-
road Company capital stock $200,000 ; Jonesboro, Lake City & Eastern Railroad Com-
pany first-mortgage 5-percent bonds due September 1, 1925, $674,000, capital stock
$600,000; St. Louis, Kennett & Southeastern Railroad Company refunding and im-
provement mortgage 6-percent bonds due March 1, 1934, $150,000, capital stock
$300,000; Birmingham Belt Railroad Company first-mortgage 4-pereent bonds due
October 1, 1922, $982,000, capital stock $50,000; total, par value, $11,623,000; total,
book value, $12,550,525.
a ee ee ee eee ee
ORIGINAL REPORT OF COMMISSION 29
D. PRESENT CAPITALIZATION
The debtor's total capitalization as of December 31, 1937, was $391,-
634,843, comprising $114,711,526 of capital stock, $234,547,597 of
funded debt unmatured, and $42,375,720 of funded debt matured
unpaid. The long-term debt securities of the system companies out-
standing in the hands of the public as of August 31, 1938, were in
principal amount as follows:
St. Lounis-San Francisco Ry. Co. : ;
Equipment obligations ....... $ 7,331,000
Collateral-trust mortgage 5-percent bonds of 1887... 4,000
Prior-lien mortgage 4-percent bonds, series A, due
July 1, 1950 91,887,097
Prior-lien mortgage 5-percent bonds, series B, due
July 1, 1950 ........ : 25,561,500
Consolidated-mortgage 4%4-percent bonds, series A,
due Mar. 1, 1978 108,305,000
Consolidated-mortgage 6-pereent bonds, series B, due
June 1, 1936 10,000,000
Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham R. R. Co. general-
mortgage 4-pereent bonds due Mar. 1, UB84..........000 3,323,390
Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham R. R. Co. 5-percent
income bonds Aue Mar. 1, VIBE .........ccccccccneeerceesseeneeeenennes 3.182.780
Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Ry. Co. refunding-
mortgage 4-percent bonds due Oct. 1, 186... eee 25,835,000
Total - 275,429,767
The short-term notes, obligations of the debtor, were as follows:
Loan from Mereantile-Commerce Bank & Trust Co., St.
Louie, Mo, de daly 2, BGS .....c.cccccecccseccscssssscenes $ 402.115
Loan from Guaranty Trust Co. New York, N. Y., due
Daly 1, TOD crcnccewennee . 1,042,894
Loan from First National Bank, St. Louis, Mo., due July
. “ 342,984
Loan from Bankers Trust Co., New York, N. Y., due July
I a cncivetsccreticecnieseneesieciepeatiinencrentnntirarennnincectiintiadscnmtentitin 422.811
Loan from Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., New York,
N. V¥., Gee Sealy 2, BSB... ..ccccccsseseccssssereceseesessssseesnenensensons 433,469
Loan from Chase National Bank, New York, N. Y., due
SS. 3 ee 2,492,592
Loan from Railroad Credit Corporation, due Dee. 31, 1935 3,307 482
Loan from Reconstruction Finance Corporation, due on
NRE 6. cccintnsaitiniiiitiadnnninianwanions ; 5,190,000
I as nateenbidiiitiichiniabion 13,634,295
ee. es
ee ee ene) ie ee Sn ere . oe
30 ST. LOUIS-S. F. RY. CO, REORGANIZATION
The capital stock was as follows:
St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. :
Preferred stock, 6-percent noncumulative? ..........008 $ 49,158,300
Common stock ws 65,543,226
Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Ry. Co. preferred
stock, 4-percent noncumulative .......cccceeeeceeeereneereeerensenes 10,000
BURRS | tment siininilhiteiniheanAAANA RCIA 114,711,526
1 Preferred as to dividends, but not as to assets.
Interest is in arrears on all obligations except the equipment obliga-
tions, the Birmingham general-mortgage bonds and income bonds,
and the collateral-trust bonds of 1887. Interest matured and unpaid
on the Fort Seott bonds as of August 31, 1938, was $4,733,440; on
the prior-lien bonds, series A and B, $22,052,903 and $7,668,450, re.
spectively; on the consolidated bonds, series A and B, $29,242,350
and $3,600,000, respectively; and on the short-term notes $3,959,391;
a total of $71,256,534. A part of this interest has since been paid.
Guaranties outstanding other than in intrasystem account are for
securities of jointly controlled termimal companies.
E. PROPOSED PLANS OF REORGANIZATION
1. Capitalization and new securities—(a) Debtor’s plan.—Under
the debtor’s plan, the equipment-trust certificates totaling $7,331,000
as of August 31, 1938, and the Birmingham general-mortgage and
income bonds totaling $6,506,170, would be left undisturbed, except
that the maturity date of the bonds would be extended to Mareh 1,
1954. In exchange for the other securities of the debtor outstanding
in the hands of the public there would be newly created and presently
issued $86,720,000 of series-A first-mortgage bonds, $61,309,600 of
series-A income bonds, $50,487,800 of prior-preferred stock, 294,944
shares of 5-percent preferred stock without par value, and = 1,452,062
shares of common stock without par value. The capitalization pro-
posed under this plan, including no-par stock at $100 a share, approxi-
mates $387,055,170 as of August 31, 1938.
The new first-mortgage bonds would be secured by a first lien,
subject to the equipment-trust liens and liens of the Birmingham
general-mortgage and income bonds on all property of the reorgan-
ized company, and, subject to certain exceptions, on after-acquired
property. The series-A bonds would be dated January 1, 1938, would
bear interest at the rate of 334 percent per annum, payable semi-
annually, would be subject to redemption at any time prior to matur-
ity, and would mature December 31, 1978. The new first mortgage
would provide for the issue of additional bonds of other series to
an unlimited amount for various purposes and subject to various
restrictions.
The new income bonds would be secured by a lien upon all property
and assets which should at any time be subject to the new _ first
mortgage, subject only to the prior lien of the first mortgage and any
liens prior thereto. The series-A bonds would be dated January 1,
HOA RE A te TRENT
ORIGINAL REPORT OF COMMISSION 31
1938, would bear interest, noncumulative, at the rate of 4 percent
per annum, payable annually if earned, would be subject to redemp-
tion at any time prior to maturity, would be entitled to the benefit
of a sinking fund, and would mature December 31, 1988. The new
income mortgage would also provide for the issue of additional bonds
of other series to an unlimited amount for various purposes and
subject to various restrictions,
If in any calendar year the reorganized company should fail to
earn its fixed charges, such deficit would be added to the fixed charges
in the next succeeding year or years, so that no income would be
thereafter available for income bonds of any series until such deficit
should have been made up. Interest on all income bonds would be
payable in multiples of one-fourth of 1 percent. The indenture under
which the first-mortgage and income-mortgage bonds would — be
issued would contain provisions to avoid default in case any install-
ment of interest or sinking-fund payments should become due before
the plan is consummated.
The prior-preferred stock would have a par value of $100 a share
and would entitle the holder thereof to dividends at the rate of $5
a share per annum, cumulative in multiples of 25 cents a share to
the extent that net income should be available therefor and not paid,
before any dividends should be declared or paid on preferred or com-
mon stock. Each share would entitle the holder thereof to 1 vote.
The stock would be callable at $105 a share, together with all unpaid
dividends declared thereon, and in the event of dissolution would
be preferred over other classes of stock in the distribution of assets
to the extent of $100 a share plus unpaid dividends declared or accu-
mulated. In addition to the 504,878 shares required in reorganiza-
tion under the debtor’s plan, approximately 100,000 shares would
be available for issue for any corporate purposes.
The preferred and common stock would be without par value,
but would have a stated value of $100 a share, which could be changed
by the board of directors with the approval of the court. Dividends
on the preferred stock of $5 a share per annum would be cumulative
in multiples of 25 cents a share to the extent that net income is avail-
able therefor and not paid. Each share would entitle the holder
thereof to 1 vote. In the event of dissolution, the holder of each
share of this stock would be entitled to the same share in the assets of
the company as that to which a holder of common stock would be
entitled. The preferred stock would be callable at $100 a share,
together with all unpaid dividends declared or accumulated. Each
share of common stock would entitle the holder thereof to 1 vote. In
addition to the 294,944 shares of preferred stock required under the
plan, there would be approximately 100,000 shares available for issue
for any proper corporate purpose.
In addition to the 1,452,062 shares of common stock to be issued
under the plan, there would be approximately 200,000 shares avail-
able for issue for any proper purpose.
(b) Committees’ plan. — The plan of reorganization proposed by
the bondholders’ committees would leave undisturbed the equipment
obligations, which as of January 1, 1940, would amount to $5,874,000.
The plan contemplates the issue of $6,506,170 of new first-mortgage
series-A bonds, $71,714,623 of new first-mortgage series-B bonds,
pia rah ea
;
f
b
32 ST. LOUIS-S. F. RY. CO. REORGANIZATION
$50,482,355 of new income-mortgage series-A bonds, $77,307,713 of
new preferred stock, 1,100,181 shares of new class-A common stock
without par value, and 614,938 shares of new class-B common stock
without par value. The total new capitalization would thus be
$383,396,761, including no-par stock at $100 a share.
The new first-mortgage bonds would be unlimited in authorized
amount, and would be secured by a first lien, subject to the liens
upon equipment, on all the property and assets of the reorganized
company and, subject to certain exceptions and limitations, on after-
acquired property. The series-\ bonds would be dated January 1,
1940, would bear interest at the rate of 4 percent per annum, payable
semiannually, or such other rate as would be necessary to give them
a market price, when the reorganization is consummated, approxi-
mately equal to their principal amount, would be subject to redemp-
tion at any time prior to maturity, would be convertible into a like
principal amount of series-B bonds, and would mature January 1,
1950. The series-B bonds would be dated January 1, 1940, would bear
interest at the rate of 4 percent per annum, would be subject to re-
demption at any time before maturity, and would mature January 1},
1980. In addition to the first-mortgage bonds to be issued in re-
organization, $5,000,000 ef series-B bonds would be placed in the
treasury of the reorganized company for sale or pledge to provide
for contingencies.
The new income-mortgage bonds would be unlimited in authorized
amount, and would be secured by a lien, subject only to the lien of the
first mortgage and liens prior thereto, upon all property at any time
subject to the lien of that mortgage. The series-A bonds would be
dated January 1, 1940, would bear interest, cumulative to a maximum
amount of 2214 percent, but not beyond, at the rate of 41% pereent per
annum, payable annually only out of available net income, after pay-
ment of fixed charges and deductions for capital fund and part one of
the emergeney-bond sinking fund, would be subject to redemption on
May 1 in any year prior to maturity, would be entitled to the benefit of
a sinking fund to be created out of available net income, would be
convertible into common stock, elass A, as at the time constituted, at
any time on or before January 1, 1945, at the rate of 15 shares for each
$1,090 of such bonds, and thereafter at the rate of 1214 shares fer each
$1,000, principal amount, of such bonds, and would mature January 1,
2015.
The preferred stock would have a par value of $100 a share and
would be preferred over other issues of stock in the distribution of
dividends and in ease of liquidation or reorganization in the distribu-
tion of assets to the extent of its par value and accrued and unpaid
accumulated dividends plus such premium as might be specified in the
stock certificates. Each share would entitle the holder to eumulative
voting in the election of directors and to one vote in all other matters,
and under certain circumstances, the holders of the preferred stock
voting as a class would be entitled to elect the majority of directors.
Preferred stock, series A, would be entitled to dividends at the rate
of $5 per annum, cumulative to the extent earned in excess of sinking-
fund and eapital-fund requirements in any calendar year, but not paid.
Aceumulation of preferred-stock dividends would not be reduced by
the capital fund or by sinking-fund requirements after all income-—
ee
are. a A PRS RINE PTCA Wena ar ET ~ Ae a ew — re
SF RT RN RN, FORO CONES RIES Hee PTE IL LE
ORIGINAL REPORT OF COMMISSION 33
mortgage bonds should cease to be outstanding. The stock would
be redeemable at any time and convertible, share for share, into com-
mon stock, class A, as at the time constituted. In addition to the
773,077 shares of preferred stock to be issued in the reorganization,
1,226,923 shares would be issuable, from time to time, with the consent
of the holders of the outstanding preferred stock.
The common stock, class A, would be entitled to dividends equal to
$5 a share in respect of each calendar year before any dividends were
paid on class B stock in respect of such year. After dividends of $5
a share on the class A common stock in respect of any year had been
paid or declared and set apart for payment, dividends up to but
not exceeding $5 a share might be declared and paid on the class B
common stock. After the dividend of $5 on the class B common stock
had been paid or declared and set apart for payment, additional divi-
dends, if any, would be paid equally, share for share, without distine-
tion between classes. Under certain circumstances, holders of class A
stock would be entitled to elect a majority of the directors. With
these exceptions, holders of both classes of common stock would rank
equally for all purposes and would be entitled to 1 vote a share on all
other matters. The total authorized issue of common stock, class A,
would be 2,700,000 shares, of which 1,530,312 would be reserved, so
long as required, to provide for the conversion of income-mortgage
bonds, series A, and preferred stock, series A. The total authorized
issue of common stock, class B, would be 650,000 shares.
2. Capital funds.—Under the debtor’s plan, the new first mortgage
would provide for the creation of a capital fund to which would
be credited, to the extent to which net earnings after fixed charges
should be available therefor, $500,000 each year until the fund should
amount to $5,000,000, and thereafter at any time when payments out
of this fund should reduce it below that figure. The fund would
be available in the discretion of the board of directors for improve-
ments, betterments, and equipment. The committees’ plan would
provide for the creation, if the board of directors should so deter-
mine, of a capital fund to be used, subject to certain limitations, for
various capital expenditures or to reimburse the reorganized com-
pany’s treasury for such expenditures, the amount to be set aside
in eapital fund out of such income of any calendar year not to
exceed 2 percent of the consolidated total railway operating revenues
of the reorganized company, less depreciation on roadway and strue-
tures charges against income in such year, plus the deficit in capital-
fund payments for the preceding year.
3. Allocation of new securities—(a) Debtor’s plan—Under the
debtor’s plan the holders of Fort Scott bonds would receive for each
$1,000 bond and acerued interest $650 in new first-mortgage bonds,
$350 in new ineome bonds, and 0.84 share of new common stock.
The holders of prior-lien series-A bonds would receive $300 in new
first-mortgage bonds, $200 in new income bonds, $250 in new prior-
preferred stock, and 1.98 shares of new common stock, for each
$1,000 bond and accrued interest. The holders of prior-lien series-B
bonds would receive $300 in new first-mortgage bonds, $200 in new
income bonds, $250 in new prior-preferred stock, and 2.2 shares
of new common stock, for each $1.090 bond and accrued interest.
The holders of consolidated series-A bonds would receive $250 in
Pat RECT ELS? Se Aas PBA
oF
PMT ET
LEKI OBA SDI CST ALOE FE
SPELT Le Fe
34 ST. LOUIS-S. F. RY. CO. REORGANIZATION
new first-mortgage bonds, $200 in new income bonds, $150 in new
prior-preferred stock, and 2.72 shares of new common stock, for
each $1,000 bond and acerued interest. The holders of consolidated
series-B bonds would receive $250 in new first-mortgage bonds, $200
in new income bonds, $150 in new prior-preferred stock, and 3.1
shares of new common stock, for each $1,000 bond and accrued
interest. The Finance Corporation would receive $2,076,000 in new
first-mortgage bonds, $2,076,000 in new income bonds, $1,038,000 in
new prior-preferred stock, and 6,588 shares of new common stock,
for principal and interest on its loans. The Credit Corporation
would receive $985,800 in new first-mortgage bonds, $985,800 in new
income bonds, $1,314,500 in new prior-preferred stock, and 1,566
shares of new common stock, for principal and interest on its loans.
The ereditor banks would receive $2,054,800 in new first-mortgage
bonds, $2,054,800 in new income bonds, $1,027,300 in new prior-
preferred stock, and 6,582 shares of new common stock, for their
loans and acerued interest. The holders of preferred stock would
receive 60 pereent in new preferred stock and 40 percent in new
common stock in exchange for the outstanding preferred stock. The
holders of common siock would receive share for share in new
common stock.
(b) Committees’ plan.—Under the committees’ plan the holders of
the Birmingham general-mortgage and income bonds, other than
bonds pledged, would receive $1,000, principal amount, in new first-
mortgage bonds, series A, for each $1,000 bonds and accrued in-
terest. Holders of Fort Seott refunding bonds would receive $700
in new first-mortgage bonds, series B, $470 of new income bonds,
and $100 of new preferred stock, for each $1,000 bond and accrued
interest. Holders of prior-lien bonds, series A, would receive $205
of new first-mortgage bonds, series B, $150 of new income bonds,
$365 of new preferred stock, and 5.8 shares of new common stock,
class A, for each $1,000 bond and accrued interest. Holders of
prior-lien bonds, series B, would receive $215 of new first-mortgage
bonds, series B, $160 of new income bonds, $385 of new preferred
stock, and 6.15 shares of new common stock, class A, for each $1,000
bond and accrued interest.
Holders of consolidated bonds, series A, would receive $215 of
new first-mortgage bonds, series B, $150 of new income bonds, $230
of new preferred stock, 3 shares of new common stock, elass A,
and 4.3 shares of new common stock, class B, for each $1,000 bond
and accrued interest. Holders of consolidated bonds, series B, would
receive $235 of new first-mortgage bonds, series B, $165 of new
ineome bonds, $250 of new preferred stock, 3.3 shares of new common ~
stock, class A, and 4.7 shares of new common stock, class B, for each
$1,000 bond and accrued interest.
The Reconstruction Finance Corporation would receive for the
loans and acerued interest on such loans the new securities issuable
in respect of the collateral pledged for such loans, namely, $1,724,180,
principal amount, of new first-mortgage bonds, series B, $1,210,675,
principal amount, of new income bonds, $1,872,630, par value, of new
preferred stock, about 24,907 shares of new common stock, class A,
and about 33,469 shares of new common stock, class B. The various
banks would similarly receive $1,937,810 of new first-mortgage bonds,
Ag IS RTA ear ENE Od sy ae F
ORIGINAL REPORT OF COMMISSION 35
series B, $1,360,590 of new ineome bonds, $2,061,500, par value, of
new preferred stock, about 27,212 shares of common stock, class A,
and about 38,756 shares of new common stock, class B.
Of new common stock, class B, 30,000 shares would be reserved
to distribute among the unsecured creditors and the Railroad Credit
Corporation. That corporation would receive about 29,250 shares
of new common stock, class B (taken at $125 a share), for its total
claim, less the debtor’s receivable share under the marshaling and
distributing fund; and other unsecured creditors would receive the
same class of stock at the same rate per share in the amount allowed
by the order or orders of the court.
4. Provisions for execution of plan.—(a) Debtor's plan.—lt is pro-
posed in the debtor’s plan that the present St. Louis-San Francisco
Railway Company be continued, with necessary changes of capital
structure effected by decree under section 77, as amended, or that a
hd corporation be organized for the purpose of carrying the plan into
effect.
Certain general unliquidated claims which accrued prior to the
filing of the bill in equity for the appointment of a receiver for
the debtor’s property are outstanding, and it is proposed in the
plan that the reorganized company agree to give in payment of
such of these claims as may be finally allowed 1 share of preferred
stock for each $100 of debt so allowed.
The reorganized company would assume the debtor’s obligations as
guarantor on the outstanding bonds of terminal companies and would
assume all executory contracts not rejected by the trustees of the
debtor prior to the consummation of the plan. Any claimant for
damages arising out of rejection of an executory contract by the trus-
tees, as proposed, would have the status of a general creditor.
All eosts of administration, allowances made by the court for ex-
penses incurred in connection with the proceedings and the prepara-
ticn and consummation of the plan, and other allowances made by the
court, would be paid in cash by the reorganized company, except
where the person entitled to such allowances should consent to dif-
ferent treatment.
(b) Commiitees’ plan.—Under the committees’ plan, claims not af-
fected by the plan comprise current liabilities of the debtor incurred
in the ordinary conduct of its business prior to the institution of the
reorganization proceeding, which are entitled to priority over one or
more of the mortgages of the debtor, and current liabilities and obli-
gations of the bankruptcy trustees. To the extent that such claims,
liabilities, and obligations are not paid pursuant to order of the court,
they would be paid in cash or assumed by the reorganized company.
The reorganized company would assume such contracts of the debtor
which are execuiory in whole or in part, including any executory
leases and liabilities under guaranties, as have been affirmed by the
bankruptcy, trustees and approved by the court, and also any executory
contracts made by the bankruptcy trustees with approval of the court
which, by their terms, do not terminate at the conclusion of the re-
organization proceeding.
Other provisions of the plans proposed will be considered later in
connection with the consideration of provisions of like purpose to be
incorporated in the approved plan.
*
%
e
z
=
¥
&
E
x
e
3
h
*
ROGET
RRM LO EP
PS ae |
NE A aR OI ak gE leg
—
UAV RUS ARON uh Rise
te:
Saeed
BCLS Dale cOIT ae
Sh
as
a
yo
%
Fé
5%
36 ST. LOUIS-S. F. RY. CO. REORGANIZATION
5. Objections to the plans of the parties.—The intervening Birming-
ham bondholders object to the treatment accorded their interests under
the committees’ plan because (1) they believe that such treatment
would seriously jeopardize the payment of future interest to holders
of those bonds; (2) it would reduce the rate of interest on the Birming-
ham income bonds from 5 to 4 percent; and (3) it would dilute the
security which safeguards the principal of the Birmingham bonds.
These Birmingham bondholders contend that they should be paid in
full in eash or the maturity date of these bonds should be extended
under the existing lien and interest rates, with provision for an ade-
quate sinking fund.
The Old Colony Trust Company, trustee under the general mort-
gage of the Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham Railroad Com-
pany, intervened and objects to the debtor’s plan because it would
extend the maturity date of the Birmingham bonds to March 1, 1954,
at the same rates of interest, without specifically providing that the
reorganized company should assume these obligations, because it be-
lieves the period of extension would be unjustifiable in view of
the present strong priority position of these bonds, and because no
provision is made for a sinking fund in connection therewith. This
trustee also objects to the committees’ plan upon substantially the
same grounds as those referred to above in connection with the inter-
vening Birmingham bondholders’ position, and because the plan does
not provide that upon the failure of the issuer to pay the new first-
mortgage series-A bonds (to be issued in exchange for the outstanding
Birmingham bonds) at maturity, then the new first-mortgage series-B
bonds would become immediately due and payable. It is urged that
under any plan of reorganization the principal of, and any accrued
interest on, the Birmingham bonds should be paid in full in cash.
The Finance Corporation objects to both the debtor’s plan and the
committees’ plan, and contends that, because of the plan and agreement
of 1932 for readjustment of the debtor’s finances, and the agreements
of the debtor, and the assets and commitments of the bondholders, com-
mittees, and readjustment managers alleged to have been made in that
plan and agreement and in connection therewith, its loan amounting
to $5,190,000 and unpaid interest as of January 1, 1940, of $2,169,533
is entitled to priority over existing mortgages to the same extent that
priority would be aceorded to any new obligations of the receivers.
The Credit Corporation objects to both proposed plans and contends
that by reason of the afore-mentioned plan and agreement of 1932,
agreements of the debtor, and the assets and commitments of the others
mentioned, its loan of $3,307,432, principal amount, and unpaid interest
as of January 1, 1940, of $383,628 is entitled to a lien upon the prop-
erty of the debtor, subject only to the liens of the Birmingham and
the Fort Scott bonds, exclusive of pledged Fort Scott bonds, and prior
to the liens of the prior-lien and the consolidated bonds, including the
pledged Fort Scott bonds, at least to the extent that the holders of
the prior-lien and consolidated bonds assented to or became bound
thereby; a lien upon the distributive shares of the debtor under the
marshaling and distributing plan, 1931; and a second lien upon the
collateral pledged with the Finance Corporation.
The Central Hanover Bank & Trust Company and Daniel K. Catlin,
as trustees under the prior-lien mortgage, and the Chase National Bank
ME ADI Re Ri CAT TAI
ORIGINAL REPORT OF COMMISSION 34
of the City of New York and John A. Aid, as trustees under the
consolidated mortgage, interveners, support the committees’ plan of
reorganization.
The United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company intervened as
surety on appeal bonds of the debtor. It states that the debtor’s
plan makes no provisions for judgment claims arising therefrom and
requests that the plan of reorganization approved by the Commis-
sion provide that any such claims remaining unpaid upon final decree
be paid in cash or assumed by the reorganized company.
6. Conclusions as to certain features of plan—Under the provisions
of section 77 (d) of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended, the Commission
is required to render a report and order in which it shall approve a
plan, which may be different from any which has been proposed, that
will in its opinion meet with the requirements of subsections (b)®
and (e)* of the section, and will be compatible with the public
6 Subsection (b) of section 77 provides in part that a plan of reorganization
‘*(1) shall include provisions modifying or altering the rights of creditors generally,
or of any class of them, secured or unsecured, either through the issuance of new
securities of any character or otherwise; * * * (4) shall provide for fixed charges
(including fixed interest on funded debt, interest on unfunded debt, amortization of
discount-en funded debt, and rent for leased railroads) in such an amount that, after
due consideration of the probable prospective earnings of the property in light of its
earnings experience and all other relevant facts, there shall be adequate coverage of
such fixed charges by the probable earnings available for the payment thereof;
(5) shall provide adequate means for the execution of the plan * * *.’’
7 Subsection (e) of section 77 provides that the judge shall approve the plan
certified to the court by the Commission if satisfied, after hearing, and without hear-
ing if no objections are filed, ‘‘that: (1) It complies with the provisions of sub-
section (b), is fair and equitable, affords due recognition to the rights of each class
of creditors and stockholders, does not discriminate unfairly in favor of any class
of creditors or stockholders, and will conform to the requirements of the law of the
land regarding the participation of the various classes of creditors and stockholders ;
(2) the approximate amounts to be paid by the debtor, or by any corporation or
corporations acquiring the debtor's assets, for expenses and fees incident to the
reorganization, have been fully disclosed so far as they can be ascertained at the
date of such hearing, are reasonable, are within such maximum limits as are fixed
by the Commission, and are within such maximum limits to be subject to the approval
of the judge; (3) the plan provides for the payment of all costs of administration
and all other allowances made or to be made by the judge,’’ except that allowances
for the actual and reasonable expenses (including reasonable attorney’s fees) in-
curred in connection with the proceedings and plan by parties in interest and by
reorganization managers and committees, or other representatives of creditors and
stockholders, and the actual and reasonable expenses incurred in connection with the
proceedings and plan and reasonable compensation for services in connection there-
with by trustees under indentures, depositaries, and such assistants as the Commission
with the approval of the judge may especially employ, may be paid in securities pro
vided for in the plan, if those entitled thereto will aceept such payment. Subsee-
tion (e) further provides that upon receipt of certification by the Commission of the
results of submission to creditors and stockholders, ‘‘the judge shall confirm the plan
if satisfied that it has been accepted by or on behalf of creditors of each class to
which submission is required under this subsection holding more than two-thirds in
amount of the total of the allowed claims of such class which have been reported in
said submission as voting on said plan, and by or on behalf of stockholders of each
class to which submission is required under this subsection holding more than two-
thirds of the stock of such class which has been reported in said submission as voting
on said plan; and that such acceptances have not been made or procured by any
means forbidden by law: Provided, That, if the plan has not been so accepted by
the creditors and stockholders, the judge may nevertheless confirm the plan if he is
wt ar |
ee a
tw
Poet Dena
38 ST, LOUIS-S. F. RY. CO, REORGANIZATION
interest; or to render a report and order in which it shall refuse to
approve any plan. Each of the plans proposed appears to meet the
requirements of subsection (b) (1) and (5) in that they would in-
elude provisions for modifying and altering the rights of creditors
and would provide adequate means for the execution of the plan.
Each plan also appears to meet the requirements of subsection (e)
(3), and the proponents of each plan would no doubt in proper time
be able to meet the requirements of subsection (e) (2). There re-
mains to be determined whether any of these plans meets or some other
plan may meet, the requirements of subsection (b) (4) and subsection
(e) (1) and is compatible with the public interest.
Il. NEW CAPITALIZATION AND CHARGES
To meet the requirement of compatibility with the public interest,
the plan proposed should in our view provide a capitalization rep-
resented by securities with some prospects for yielding a return to
their holders, and having something more than mere speculative value.
To meet these requirements, as well as the requirements of subsection
(b) (4) of section 77, there must be adequate coverage of fixed charges
by the probable earnings available for the payment thereof.
A. ASSETS, CAPITALIZATION, TRAFFIC, REVENUES, ETC.
1. Book assets and valuation figures——The consolidated general
balance sheet of system companies as of December 31, 1937, shows
the following assets: Road and equipment $426,452,105, deposits in
lieu of mortgaged property sold $828,168, miscellaneous physical prop-
erty $677,903, investments in affiliated companies $1,409,906, and other
investments $11,531,386, a total of $440,899,468 of investments. Current
assets were $15,101,920, including $6,277,579 in cash and $5,813,381 in
material and supplies. Deferred assets were $229,438, and unadjusted
debits were $1,304,563. ‘Total assets were $457,535,389. <A total of
$103,574,150 of securities issued or assumed by system companies was
pledged, and a total of $21,653 was reported as held unpledged.
Liabilities shown on the same balance sheet comprise common stock
$65,543,226, preferred stock $49,158,300, grants in aid of construction
$525,666, long-term debt $234,547,597, current liabilities $125,471,849,
deferred liabilities $199,470, unadjusted credits $48,904,639, and a
corporate deficit of $66,815,358 after taking into account additions to
property through income and surplus of $1,884,039 and appropriated
surplus not specifically invested of $233,455,
Current liabilities include notes payable, secured, $13,634,295, traffic
and ear-service balances payable $350,753, audited accounts and wages
payable $2,652,826, miscellaneous accounts payable $111,782, interest
matured unpaid $62 793,532, dividends matured unpaid $13,565, funded
debt actually outstanding matured unpaid $42,375,720, unmatured
interest accrued $2,150,745, and other current liabilities $388,631.
satisfied and finds, after hearing, that it makes adequate provision for fair and equi-
table treatment for the interests or claims of those rejecting it; that such rejection
is not reasonably justified in the light of the respective rights and interests of those
rejecting it and all the relevant facts’’; and that the plan conforms to the above-
stated requirements of this subsection.
ORIGINAL REPORT OF COMMISSION 39
Unadjusted credits include tax liability $1,974,424, insurance and
casualty reserves $12,694, accrued depreciation of road $1,237,108,
accrued depreciation of equipment $44,429,977, and other unadjusted
eredits $1,250,437.
As of December 31, 1936, the original cost of the property of the
debtor was $208,133,792 for road and $89,354,756 for equipment, the
cost of reproduction new $239,492,025 for road and $94,474,274 for
equipment, the cost of reproduction less depreciation $168,318,419
for road and $48,351,025 for equipment, and the value of lands and
rights $22,030,860. The cost of reproduction less depreciation, plus
the value of lands and rights, and an allowance of $3,955,800 for
working capital, amounts to $242,656,104. It is further shown that
the cost of reproduction less depreciation of road and equipment
of all other system companies plus the value of lands and rights and
an allowance of $58,100 for working capital, amounts to $13,363,287.
The latter sum when added to the comparable figure for the debtor
would produce a total for the system of $256,019,391. Cost-of-re-
production-new figures were based on revised inventories as of Decem-
ber 31, 1934, with consideration given to subsequent changes in property
items as disclosed by the carrier’s records for 1935 and 1936. Period
prices were applied, determined from consideration of records of prices
and their individual trends prevailing in 1936 and during a period of
time prior and subsequent thereto. Cost of reproduction less deprecia-
tion was determined in accordance with methods frequently explained
in the valuation reports of this Commission.
2. Traffic and revenues.—The revenve freight and the freight rev-
enues of the system lines increased each year, rising from 24,102,790
tons and $62,498,060, respectively, in 19238, to 26,317,707 tons and
$71,681,444, respectively, in 1926, then declined each year, except
1929, amounting to 13,457,692 tons and $35,717,366, respectively, in
1932, and 13,756,787 tons and $34,932,836 in 19383. In 1929 the number
of tons was 27,097,973 and the freight revenues $70,376,366. In 1934,
1935, 1936, and 1937, 14,054,112, 13,981,609, 16,888,918, and 17,625,909
tons, respectively, were moved, producing revenues of $35,555,780,
$35,834,793, $42,298,701, and $42,909,254, respectively. Freight rev-
enues derived from principal commodities for the years indicated were
as follows:
Derived from— 1926 1936 1937
Products of agriculture. .............---..-----eeceee eee eeeeeee $12, 190, 741 $7, 245, 767 $7, 749, 411
Animals and products...... .. .. Lis padvekeckhestbbsakeeteenete 3, 750, 524 2, 081, 096 2, 016, 735
ee eee re 9, 318, 796 5, 223, 890 5, 428, 021
RN ne ng cu ccceuancecnnscavcknestacentoneten 6, S89, 056 2, 927, 070 3, 003, 648
Manufactures and miscellaneous ................-----------+- 30, 070, 927 21, 398, 913 21, 405, 136
L908 CHAM GRFRORGS. . 0. acc cc.ccecccncccccccccccccccesssenses 9, 461, 400 3, 421, 965 3, 308, 303
The average revenues per ton-for the years 1931-37 were $2.61, $2.65,
$2.54, $2.53, $2.56, $2.51, and $2.44, respectively.
The system lines carried 9,457,960 revenue passengers in 1923, pro-
ducing revenue of $20,597,709. Each year thereafter the number of
passengers decreased until 1933, when 690,022 passengers were carried,
producing revenue of only $2,340,957, An improvement in this traffic
began in 1934 when 980,119 passengers produced total passenger rev-
40 ST, LOUIS-S. FL RY, CO, REORGANIZATION
enues of $2,497,880. The improvement continued through 1986 - when
1,370,491 passengers were carried and passenger revenues of $5,451,938
were received, There were 1,418,115 passengers carried in 1937, pro-
ducing revenues of $3,785,055, The average revenues per passenger
for the years 1931-37, inclusive, were $3.371, $8404, $3.393, $2549,
$2.519, $2.519, and $2.669, respectively.
3. Earnings and expenses.—Earnings available for fixed charges.—
The system railway operating revenues increased from $89,633,152 in
1923 to $94,715,375 in 1925, declined to $85,782,818 in 1928, increased
to $89,109,286 in 1929, declined each year thereafter, reaching $40,-
693,596 in 1933, and then increased each year, reaching $51,218,937 in
1937. The railway operating expenses in 1923 were $65,954,620 and
remained at approximately that figure until 1927, when they were re-
duced to $62,263,277. They were $59,783,801 in 1928, $62,847,958 in
1929, and $33,822,276 in 1933, and then inereased each year, reaching
$41,170,783 in 1936. In 1987 these expenses were $43,194,545. The
operating ratios for the years 1923, 1927, 1928, 1929, 1933, 1936, and
1937 were 73.56, 69.76, 69.69, 70.53, 83.11, 82.04, and $4.33 percent,
respectively. Other operating charges, embracing railway tax accruals,
uncollectible railway revenues, hire of equipment, and jomt-facility
rents, ranged from $6,464,324 in 1925 to $3,231,562 in 1937. Non-
operating income increased from $451,827 in 1923 to $38,778,629 in
1928, declined to $334,684 in 1932, and again declined from $508,339
in 1933 to $153,071 in 1936, but increased to $182,105 in 1937. Other
deductions from income, embracing rentals, miscellaneous tax accruals,
separately operated properties, miscellaneous income charges, and sink-
ing and other reserve funds, ranged trom $766,241 in 1923 to $64,072
in 1937.
Income available for payment of interest increased from $18,339,468
in 1923 to $24,636,429 in 1928, declining to $1,476,347 in 1935, increas-
ing to $5,197,171 in 19386, and declining to $4,911,063 in 19387, — In-
terest on fixed-charge obligations ranged from $10,039,232 in 1923 to
$13,620,863 in 1928, and from $12,500,382 in 1929 to $13,518,941 in
1932, decreasing each year thereafter to $12,841,172 in 1937.5 Net
income ranged from $3,762,859 in 1923 to $10,192,073 in 1929, and
decreased to $5,621,586 in 1980.) From 1931 to 1937, the deficits in
net income were $3,255,763, $10,093,677, $10,261,499, $10,638,308, $11,-
560,016, $7,722,727, and $7,980,109, respectively." The fixed interest
charges were earned from 1,83 times in 1925 to 2.11 times in 1925,
1.44 times in 1930, 0.76 time in 1931, 0.11 time in 1985, and O40
time in 1936.
The average income available for interest during the 10-year period
1923-32 was $18,686,538 a year, and for the 4-year period 1933-36,
$3,107,818 a year. The latter figure would be increased to $3,287,318
by including the canceled taxes of $718,000 as income available for
interest in 1936. As above indicated, the income available for interest
8In addition to the fixed-interest obligations for the years 1923-28, the interest
paid on cumulative adjustment-mortgage bonds averaged $2,228,799 a year, and on
inecome-mortgage bonds it averaged $2,022,290 a year.
9 The 1936 and 1937 deficits include approximately $718,000 and $82,000, respec-
tively, of taxes under the Railroad Retirement Act of 1935 and Federal and State
unemployment acts which were repealed in July 1937 and credited back in December
1937.
OOM te
ORIGINAL REPORT OF COMMISSION 41
in 1935 was less than that in any other year during the 14-year period
and decreases the average. The average for the period 1932-36, omitting
1935, was $3,595,047 a year, not including the canceled taxes, anc
$3,774,547 inclusive of those taxes. These last two averages capitalized
at 5 percent produce $71,900,940 and $75,490,940, respectively.
lf income available for payment of interest, as shown by the books
of account of the debtor and system companies named, were adjusted
so as to correct accounting not in conformity with the Commission’s
accounting regulations, further adjusted to include income items en-
tered in profit and loss account by permission of the Commission, and
to give retroactive effect to current regulations governing accounting
for depreciation of equipment and to tax legislation subsequently en-
acted, the averages for the 5 years 1930 to 1934 would be those set
forth in the following table:
|
| Fort | : ‘ St.
| Birm. | Worth lets proses Louis,
tiem Debtor | MEhAM) @ Rio | Wane | anne | 5. F &
te Belt | Grande Western! Pacifie Texas
j RR. | sari Ry Ry agg
Ry. ) ; Ry.
1. Interest on funded and wofanded debt $13, 253, 192 | gaz, 382 $708 lesion, 023 ($162, 921 [1 844, 449
. Interest as in item Latter correcting account
ing
3%. Income availible for payment of taterest ?
4 Income as in item 3 efter correcting account-
inv 7, 820, 659
% Income as in item 3 after adjustment to in-
clude items entered in profit: and loss ae-
count 6, 212, O86 | 42, 900 |.........
'
'
‘
527 "
42, 960 |! 359,727 | 73,149 | 62,848 |! 470, 87.
42, 960 [1 345, 389 49, 309 | | 422, 229
» Income asin item 3 after adjustment to give
retroactive effect to current reculations
governing accounting for depreciation of
equipment ae ' 7, 768, 49 48,117
7 Income as in item 3 after adjustment to give yt
retroactive etleet to new legislation... 6, 625, 037 | 37,099 |! $71, 709 -| 35,312 | ' 463, 957
|
' Deficit.
? As stated on carriers’ books of account ; ;
4 Includes an averae of $445,788 of interest and dividends receivable from the affiliated companies named
in this table, except the Fort Worth & Rio Grande Ry
The income of the Gulf, Texas & Western Railway Company on
and sinee July 1, 1980, has been from rent equal to the interest accru-
ing on its outstanding bonds, and amounting to $100,000. All cur-
rent taxes and maintenance and operating costs of this line are as-
sumed by the lessee. The only income items recorded on the books
of the Jonesboro, Lake City & Eastern Railroad Company, Butler
County Railroad Company, St. Louis, Kennett & Southeastern Rail-
road Company, and the Miami Mineral Belt Railroad Company during
the 5-year period are relatively small amounts generally not in excess
of $12,000, reflecting transactions of the periods prior to the dates
these lines were leased to the debtor.
The debtor’s net railway operating income of $5,880,915 for 1936,
as shown by the books of account, was approximately 2.4 percent of
the figure given above for cost of reproduction less depreciation plus
value of land and rights and the allowance for working capital. The
system’s net railway operating income of $5,116,889 in 1936, as shown
by the books of account, was approximately 2 percent of the figure
given above for corresponding elements of value for the system as a
whole.
ome ar |
OOO EAS
42 ’ ST. LOUIS-S. F. RY. CO. REORGANIZATION
Consolidated income available for payment of interest from 1925
to 1938, as shown by the books of account, and as adjusted to eliminate
the Fort Worth & Rio Grande Railway Company (not now owned
by the debtor), and taxes charged and later credited back, and fur-
ther adjusted as regards the years 1930 to 1934, inclusive, to correct
accounting not in conformity with our accounting regulations, to
include income items entered in profit and loss account by permission
of the Commission, and to give retroactive effect to current regula
tions governing accounting for depreciation of equipment was as
follows :
|
As shown Books As shown Books
by books | adjusted by books | adjusted
Year 1008..............--- $24, 636, 429 | $24, 648,827 || Year 1934. $2, 552,363 | $2, 698, 485
Year BOGD. ... . 20. woe neenees 22, 692,455 | 22, 869, 738 Year 1935... 1, 476, 348 1, 370, 998
Year 1990... ........------ 18, 405, 651 17, 608, 663 || Year 1936... §, 197, 171 6, 207, 498
Year 1081... .........----- 10, 074, 729 | 10, 288, 49 Year 1937... .... 4, 911, 062 4, 268, 109
Year 1032... .........----- 3, 425, 204 3, 583, G47 || Year 1938... ........-- 1, 241, SSS Lea Shethes
Year 1083... .........----- 3, 205, 389 3. 071, O75
Bh. CONCLUSIONS AS TO NEW CAPITALIZATION AND FIXED CHARGES
The average income available for payment of interest during the
last 7 years stated was $3,201,671 annually. All of this sum was not,
however, and could not have been, paid out in interest, if the property
was to be properly managed, since, among other reasons, capital re-
quirements which had to be financed from earnings rather than bor-
rowing were large. From the appointment of the receivers in November
1932, there was expended for additions and betterments to the prop-
erty to December 31, 1937, about $9,397,000 of cash or its equiva-
lent, or about $1,819,000 a year. To March 1, 1938, interest payments
were only about $5,226,000, or about $1,000,000 a year, although an
average for the 6 years ended with 1938 of about $3,150,000 annually
was apparently available. This requirement, that a part of income
be available for capital purposes, and not all pledged for debt service,
is not peculiar to receivership or bankruptey ; sound financing demands
it at all times. The burden is, however, generally heavier during
receivership and bankruptey than during periods when the company
is not in default, especially if, as in the case of the debtor, receivership
was brought about largely through excessive fixed charges, and the
proportion of revenues spent on maintenance was increased during
the period of default.
The annual interest on the undisturbed equipment-trust obligations
as of June 30, 1937, and the annual fixed interest on the outstanding
Birmingham bonds total $704,000, The annual fixed interest on the
new first-mortgage bonds proposed in the debtor’s plan totals $3,252.-
000, and the contingent interest on the new income bonds each year
totals $2,452,400. Thus the annual fixed interest charges under the
debtor’s plan total $3,956,000. The dividends on the new prior:
preferred stock, if paid in full at the rate proposed in the plan, would
total $2,524,400, and on the new preferred stock $1,474,700. Sinkine
fund and provision for capital fund would require about $806,548
annually. The total of these items is $11,214,048,
ORIGINAL REPORT OF COMMISSION 43
The annual fixed charges under the committees’ plan would be
$207,664 on equipment obligations, $260,247 on first-mortgage bonds,
series A, and $2,868,585 on first-mortgage bonds, series B, a total of
$3,336,496. Contingent intercst on the income bonds amounts to
$2,271,706. Capital-fund charges would be $1,000,000, when total
operating revenues were $50,000,000, and would exceed $1,000,000 with
any further increase in total operating revenues. Income-mortgage
sinking fund initial requirement would be $252,412 (0.5 percent of
greatest principal amount of income bonds outstanding). Preferred-
stock dividends would be $3,865,386. The total requirements for in-
terest, preferred dividends, capital fund, and sinking fund would thus
be $10,726,000.
Both plans of reorganization proposed by the parties give direct and
definite consideration to the question of financing capital requirements
from earnings in determining the charges which may or must precede
the payment of contingent interest; but the same consideration does
not appear to have been given the same question in determining the
amount of appropriate fixed charges, although a part of such expendi-
tures, at least, can no more be avoided than can operating expenses.
With income available for interest averaging only $3,201,671 during
the last 7 years, the fixed interest charges proposed for the reorganized
company by the three bondholders’ committees and by the debtor both
appear excessive, even though, as is the fact, maintenance expenditures
have been in excess of normal. Reducing by 10 percent the fixed-
interest debt proposed by the bondholders’ committees would reduce
the fixed-interest requirements to $3,000,117 on a 4-percent basis for
the new bonds. This appears a reasonable amount for the reorganized
debtor to assume, and is approved.
The plan of reorganization proposed by the committees is based on
a total of present capital liability and other liabilities proposed to be
funded in the plan of $491,309,628 as of January 1, 1940" This re-
fleets $1,457,000 decrease in the equipment obligations in, and an in-
crease of $17,748,608 in the interest over, the debtor's figures as of
August 31, 1938. As noted above, the new capitalization proposed by
the debtor, including no-par-value securities at the stated values, would
total $387,055,170 as of August 31, 1938, and that proposed by the %
bondholders’ committees would comprise $211,884,861 of funded debt
and preferred stock having a par value, 1,100,181 shares of class A com-
mon stock without par value, and 614,938 shares of class B common
stock without par value, the class A common stock being preferred as
to dividends over the class B common stock to the extent of $5 a share
a year. Since the class A common stock would be exchanged at the
rate of $100 a share for claims having priority over those for which
the class B common stock would be issued, and in view of the amount
of the dividend preference, an asset and prospective earnings value of
$100 a share for the class A common stock appears to be called for.
Thus a capitalization substantially in exeess of $321,902,961 must be
justified if any of the class B stock is to be issued. If the latter be
taken at $50 a share, the capitalization proposed by the committees is
in effect over $350,000,000, a sum equaling the eapitalizatien at 5 per-
10 Does not take into account payments of interest amounting to $2,785,118 made
after the filing of the plan.
parle? -
a ee
44 ST. LOUIS-S. F. RY. CO. REORGANIZATION
cent of annual earnings of $17,500,000. In the 8-year period 1931 to
1938 the debtor’s consolidated net railway operating income has never
approached that figure, and has averaged only $3,739,507 annually.
The latter sum, capitalized at 5 percent, amounts to only $74,790,140.
Exclusive of the Fort Worth & Rio Grande Railway Company, sub-
sequently sold, the value as of December 31, 1936, on a reprodwection-
less-depreciation basis of roadway structures and equipment plus pres-
ent value of lands, working capital, and investments in nonsystem
companies, was approximately $260,000,000.
Ill. PLAN APPROVED
A. CAPITALIZATION ; FIXED CHARGES
Considering the entire record and taking into account the repro-
duction value of the property remaining in service after the aban
donments and the favorable past earnings, as well as the unfavorable
recent earnings, it would appear that the total capitalization after
reorganization should be about $240,000,000. Of the total capitali-
zation proposed, rather less than half should be in the form of debt
and rather more than half in the form of stock, of which the amount
of no-par common stock, taken at $50 a share, should somewhat exceed
the preferred stock. This result may be attained by reducing the
fixed-interest debt proposed by the three committees by 10 percent,
the contingent-interest debt by 20 percent, and the preferred stock
by 20 percent, producing approximately the following capitalization :
Fixed-interest debt, 4 percent.......ccccccececseserseeeeeeeeeenneenersenees $ 75,685,314
Contingent-interest debt, 444 Percent........cecececererereerseererereees 40,385,884
Preferred stock, 5 percent.......ccccccscsseseeseeseserseeseseesneneesnenereenees 61,846,170
Common stock, no-par value stated at $50 a share............ 62,082,632
I i iia ceases annie leieevicninthnnmnnnnbinenveannans 240,000,000
Fixed interest charges for 1940 under such capitalization would
amount to $3,000,117 and, as shown below, there should be provided
for additions and betterments each year out of income approximately
$1,125,000, and for unconditional sinking funds on fixed-interest |
bonds to be outstanding $32,531. Contingent interest charges would
be $1,817,365, and for contingent-interest debt there should be pro- |
vided, as shown below, sinking-fund payments of $201,929 a year,
or a maximum requirement of approximately $6,176,992 before ap-
propriation for dividends on the preferred stock. The preferred |
dividends would amount to $3,092,309, making the maximum re-
quirements for interest, special funds, and preferred dividends, ap-
proximately $9,269,251 before any income would be available for
payment of dividends on common stock. Should income available
for interest, other requirements, and dividends equal that of 181,
viz, $10,288,049, which is reasonably possible, there would be ap-
proximately $1,018,748 for payment of dividends on the common.
stock, or enough to pay dividends thereon at the rate of about $0.82.
a share.
The capitalization proposed would give the reorganized company
a well-balanced financial structure, should afford adequate means
ey RTE a
ORIGINAL REPORT OF COMMISSION 45
for such future financing as may be necessary, should enable the
carrier to maintain its properties adequately, and should not lead to
further need of judicial reorganization. It includes only such
securities as would give the holders thereof some prospect of interest
or dividends, and would otherwise be compatible with the public
interest. Fixed charges, including fixed interest on funded debt,
interest on unfunded debt, amortization of discount on funded debt,
and rent for leased road would be of such amount that, after due
consideration of the probable prospective earnings of the property
in the light of its earnings experience and all other relevant facts,
there would be adequate coverage of such fixed charges by the
probable prospective earnings available for the payment thereof.
(Superseded matter is here omitted)
C. PARTICIPATION IN REORGANIZATION
The road is in good physical condition. No new securities are
needed to finance any rehabilitation work. All securities issued in
accordance with the reduced capitalization proposed herein will be
available for distribution to present security holders.
1. Rights of creditors —(a) Liens.—Equipment-trust certificates,
other than those not presented for payment at maturity, outstand-
ing on August 31, 1938, were of three series. Series BB, issued
February 15, 1926, amounting to $1,558,000 as of August 31, 1938,
covers equipment which originally cost $10,462,128. Series CC,
issued May 15, 1928, amounting to $2,000,000 as of August 31, 1938,
covers equipment which originally cost $8,236,272. Series DD, issued
April 1, 1930, amounting to $3,773,000 as of August 31, 1938, covers
equipment which originally cost $10,849,959. The book value and
the depreciated book value of this equipment on August 31, 1938, ’
were $30,043,250 and $18,536,320, respectively. The car-hire net
receipts for 1937 were 4.23 percent of the equipment obligations
outstanding on August 31, 1938.
The Birmingham general-mortgage bonds and income bonds as of
December 1936, were secured by first and second liens, respectively, on
290.72 miles of the debtor’s road extending between Birmingham,
-Ala., and Memphis, Tenn., and on certain equipment. Exclusive of
lands and rights, the original cost of this property was $14,225,806
and the cost of reproduction less depreciation as of December 31, 1936,
was $15,225,806. The value of lands and rights was $1,408,754.
The Fort Scott refunding-mortgage bonds, subject to claims for
prior equities against the pledged bonds, were secured by a direct
‘first lien on 823.66 miles of the debtor's road in Kansas, Missouri,
_ Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Tennessee, and 347 units of equipment, and a
junior lien on the property securing the Birmingham general-mortgage
bonds and income bonds. In addition $399,500 of the income bonds
were pledged under the Fort Scott mortgage. Exclusive of lands
and rights, the original cost of direct first-lien property was $60,331,393
_and the cost of reproduction less depreciation as of December 31, 1936,
was $32,662,151. The value of lands and rights was $5,828,495.
The collateral-trust mortgage of 1887 has been released, and there
were $4,000 of such bonds outstanding secured by deposit of $6,000 of
United States Government bonds. |
_ us ” - a * 4
OT bi tN 5 tilt DEPN DRONE Gt ELDAR ScD AAI JLRS A ES CR Bee OTP OR MPA 60>
Ie Re
wae
SEC Sat SN 2
ca
46 ST. LOUIS-S. F. RY. CO. REORGANIZATION
Subject to claims for prior equities hereinafter discussed, the prior-
lien bonds, series A, B, and E, were secured by a direct first lien on
3,660.76 miles of the debtor’s road and 9,767 units of equipment, a
second lien on the equipment subject to equipment trusts, and a junior
lien on the property subject to the Fort Scott refunding-mortgage
and the Birmingham general-mortgage bonds and income bonds, the
last mentioned being subject to an intermediate lien of the consolidated
mortgage for $3,548,732. Exclusive of lands and rights, the original
cost of direct-first-lien property was $169,677,183 and the cost of re-
production less depreciation as of December 31, 1936, was $136,317,241.
The value of lands and rights was $14,793,611. Except as otherwise
noted, the prior-lien bonds were additionally secured by pledges of
all the bonds and stocks of the wholly owned system companies men-
tioned above.
The consolidated-mortgage bonds, series A and B, were seeured by
a direct lien on all property of the debtor, subject to liens of equipment
obligations and prior existing mortgages diseussed above, additionally
secured by pledges of securities totaling $87,428,650 in principal
amount and comprising $1,293,250 of prior-lien series-A 4-percent
bonds, $46,606,300 of prior-lien series-B 5-pereent bonds, $17,851,100
of prior-lien series-E 6-pereent bonds, and $21,678,000 of Fort Scott
refunding-mortgage 4-percent bonds, and further secured by the inter-
mediate lien for $3,548,732 on the Fort Scott properties prior to the
lien of the prior-lien mortgage.
The loans from the Mereantile-Commerce Bank & Trust Company
of St. Louis, First National Bank of St. Louis, Bankers Trust Com-
pany, and the Central Hanover Bank & Trust Company were each
collaterally secured by pledge of $625,000 of consolidated series-B
6-percent bonds. The loans from the Guaranty Trust Company
and the Chase National Bank were secured by pledges of $1,562,500
and $4,183,500 of consolidated series-B 6-percent bonds, respectively.
The loans from the Railroad Credit Corporation, amounting to
$3,307,432 in principal amount, were collaterally secured by pledge
of the debtor’s distributive share under the marshaling and distribut-
ing fund in the book amount of $195,055 as of October 1, 1938, and
by the debtor’s equity in all collateral deposited with the Finance
Corporation. The loans of $5,190,000 in principal amount from the
latter corporation were collaterally secured by pledge of securities
issued by the debtor totaling $7,500,000, comprising $218,000 of prior-
lien series-A 4-percent bonds, $28,000 of prior-lien series-B 5-percent
bonds, $1,561,000 of consolidated series-A 414-percent bonds, and
$5,693,000 of consolidated series-B 6-percent bonds. The two credi-
tors last named contend that they are additionally secured by special
equities.
In the determination of the proper distribution of the new securi-
ties, there are no disputed questions of lien to be decided, except those
raised by the Reconstruction Finance Corporation and the Railroad
Credit Corporation. These two institutions claim, in fact and effect.
equitable liens superior to the mortgages on most of the system
property, at least as against those holders of prior-lien and consoli-
dated-mortgage bonds who assented to the plan of readjustment of
1932, subsequently abandoned. They further contend that the bank
4;
a ee ee ee
6 Qh fhe eoaS oe ae lhUelCU
~~ >. 1 Pn & FP
~~ma-«
vy
ee ee =m
ORIGINAL REPORT OF COMMISSION 47
loans are subordinated to their claims. These claims ar
This text is long and has been trimmed here. Open the source document for the complete record.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.