Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ashkar v. Von Eschenbach

Supreme Court, U.S.

P hap FILED™

011802 JUN -4 2002

No. OFFICE OF THE ULEKK

In THE

SUPREME CouRT OF THE UNITED STATES

ASHKAR - Petitioner

VS.

VON ESCHENBACH - Respondent

ON PETITION FOR. A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

GEORGE E. ASHKAR

61-37 BELL BOULEVARD

OAKLAND GARDENS, NY 11364-2239

PHONE No; (718) 423-1112

ees _—— —_

No.

In THE

SupREME CourT OF THE UNITED STATES

ASHKAR - Petitioner

VS.

VON ESCHENBACH - Respondent

ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

GEORGE E. ASHKAR

61-37 BELL BOULEVARD

OAKLAND GARDENS, NY | 1364-2239

PHONE No; (718) 423-1112

QUESTION PRESENTED for REVIEW

CAPITAL CASE

(Sort of)

Introductory Statement

Medical professionals do not have treatment to cure cancer

diseases after 200 years of researches

1 am a Physicist | developed a treatment method

Neutral-Infection Absorption to cure cancer disease with

100% recuperation and it was in use since 1943

| am offering my treatment method to, in general, medical

professionals and , in particularly. to Director of National

Cancer Institute, they are refusing to accept it, 280 million

of United States Citizens deprived to have the treatment, as

a result they are suffering and dying needlessly

| am asking respectfully the Supreme Court that a writ of

certiorari issue to review the judgment of affirmation, the

dismissal of the case, by United States Court of Appeals

QUESTION

Can I go ahead with the case and force Director of

National Cancer Institute to accept my NIA treatment

method and use it in public?

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COUN WORE secnivniinicineiiciiadaiaiainitebibitalanas

SITES PO wncicivncinssnbinilianiiecviiaenia 3

STATEMENT OF THE CASE ------------------------- 2

CONICS EIRENE nncicennccincensscnnsinanuidiiatianitens 6

INDEX TO APPENDICES

APPENDIX A Decision of U.S. Court of Appeals

APPENDIX B Decision of U.S. District Court

No

IN THE

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

GEORGE E. ASHKAR - Petitioner

vs

VON ESCHENBACH - Respondent

On Petition For Writ Of Certiorari To The United States

Court Of Appeals For The Second Circuit

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari

issue to review the judgments below

OPINIONS BELOW

For case from federal courts. The opinion of the United

States Court of Appeals at Appendix A to the petition and

is unpublished.

The opinion of the United States District Court appears

at Appendix B to the petition and is unpublished

JURISDICTION

The date on which the United States Court of Appeals

decided my case was April 25, 2002.

No petition for rehearing was timely filed m my case.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

In 1977 I became Citizen of the United States of

America, I was so happy I wanted to give back something to

show my appreciation. The best thing I could give Americans

was my treatment method, Neutral Infection - Absorption

(NIA), which I developed in 1943 and it was in use since

then and, which Americans badly needed to prevent and

cure cancer disease.

Since then problems started, introduce the treatment

method to cure cancer became mission impossible. My all

efforts to introduce my treatment method to medical

professionals failed. The last resort was to explain my

treatment method to director of National Cancer Institute

(NCD), who is the only person in the United States responsible

and have obligation to find a cure for cancer disease. To give

an end to all of fruitless researches, that medical professionals

were conducting for the past 200 years, and save millions of

lives I asked the Director of NCI to participate in their seminar

to explain the method to interested researchers, was denied. |

asked to meet him to explain the method, he refused. I asked

to publish my article, by sending manuscript about Mechanism

Development of Cancer, in the CANCER journal of the NCI,

was denied. I asked to use my treatment method(NIA), which

I sent to him, was denied also.

Here also the last resort was to invite him to court

house to explain him the science of medicine so on January 29,

2001 I filed complain in the United States District Court Eastern

District of New York to start the civil case against Director of

NCI. I needed him for only one hour to explain the method,

instead he is spending days and weeks in library digging in the

Federal Rules and Regulations to find excuse to refuse the

meeting. If the meeting takes place I promise I will not lynch

him instead I will explain scientific research of medical problem

and introduce my NIA treatment method, which can cure all

kind of non viral - bacterial diseases, caused by particles and

4

chemicals, like rheumatoid arthritis, breast and skin cancer with

100% recuperation and it was in use since 1943 and never failed.

Unfortunately Honorable judge John Gleeson of the

United States District Court Eastern District of New York,

siding with defendant and ignoring my explanation on August 8,

2001 made a poor judgment and dismissed the case

(Appendix B).

Another poor judgment was made on April 25, 2002

in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

by affirming the dismissal of the case(Appendix A).

| Having in consideration that the work of the federal

courts touches upon many of the most significant issues

affecting the American people, and federal judges exercise

wide authority and discretion in the cases over which they

preside. Since no one Constitution or Federal Rules are

complete and perfect, the Founding Fathers of the Nation

considered an independent federal judiciary essential to ensure

fairness and equal justice for all citizens of the United States

and created oral argument to solve the problem, which could

not be predicted in advance.

Now you have choice to defend one person, Director

of NCI, or 280 million Americans, if you feel that Americans

do not deserve to suffer, have miserable life and die, go ahead

and grant the writ of certiorari to save their lives.

If you are here to seek justice for all citizen of the

United States I am giving you the chance to show your

intention. By doing this you will not violate any Rules since you

are defending 280 million Americans’ right against one person's,

director of NCI who is keeping US Citizens hostage, depriving

them from having treatment to prevent and cure their cancer.

Despite I am the litigant, I am doing this for you, for

American people except me and my wife we have the treatment

you don't. If I win you, American people are the winner, you

will get the treatment. If I loose you, American people are the

looser you will not get the treatment.

Finally I want to make it clear that activity of the NCI

based on lying to the Federal Government, lying to the

American people and lying to each other about "success" of

6

cancer researches, proof of that; after 200 years of research

results are ZERO.

For the benefit of the world population and particularly

for the American people United States Supreme Court should

get involved actively to solve the problem as soon as possible

without any delays. If the problem is not fixed now, soon

Americans will face even more disastrous problem in the near

future, practicing of genetic therapy, which does not exist but

this is good case for charlatans to make a lot of money by

killing people.

CONCLUSION

Finally I respectfully asking the Unitd States Supreme

Court the petition for a writ of certiorari should be granted.

We are at dead end, threament of cancer is sinking in the

swamp and no way out, I am getting older and getting tired

if I do not fix it now nobody will, fix it now or never.

Dated Oakland Gardens, New York

June 2, 2002 Respectfully submitted

Gesrac t. (deter,

George E. Ashkar, PhD.