Amicus Curiae Brief — Clean Air Coordinating Committee v. Roth Adam Fuel Co.
Supreme Court brief1973
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
Ix Tas
Supreme Court of the United State
Ocroszs Team, 1972
No. 72-243
The State of Montana, by its Attorney General Robert
L. Woodahl, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 42(4) here-
by requests that the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari be
granted. The State believes that this Court should hear
this case because it involves a reoccuring issue of substan-
tial importance throughout the country.
Under the amendments to the federal Clean Air Act,
many federal implementation plans will be formulated over
the years for each state covering various pollutants. It
was the clear intent of Congress that a state would supply
the key input for every federal implementation plan for
that state. It was also the clear intent of Congress that
there would be adherence to federal time schedules for the
development of such plans especially since they each in-
cluded provisions necessary for the protection of human
health. Contrary to such intent, the Seventh Circuit’s deci-
sion would permit the halting of state input and a dis-
ruption of time schedules due to the initiation by any dis-
satisfied individual of a premature review proceeding
before federal finalization of any implementation plan.
That would be detrimental to the states and their residents.
Respectfully submitted,
Rosert L. Woopan.
Attorney General
State of Montana, by
CRS L. ODox xx
Special Assistant Attorney General
Department of Health and
Environmental Sciences
Cogswell Building
Helena, Montana
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.