Brief for Respondents in Opposition — Redwood v. New York

pene Cent tte

October Term, 1971

No. 71-53

JUNIUS REDWOOD,

Petitioner,

agamst

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,

Respondent.

On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the New York

Supreme Court, Appeilate Term, First Judicial Department

BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT IN OPPOSITION

TO PETITION FOR CERTIORARI

Frank S. Hocan

District Attorney

New York County

Attorney for Respondent

155 Leonard Street

New York, New York 10013

(212) 732-7300

MicHazt R. JUvILER

Lewis R. FrrepMan

Assistant District Attorneys

Of Counsel

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

ce | RIERA Sean AT Na 1

rr CS i es 2

Argument

Petitioner’s motion is untimely, as the New York

Court of Appeals properly dismissed his appli-

cation for leave to appeal oo...0...0.ooooooccccocecececeee by)

Point 1!—The petitioner’s right to a trial by jury,

as interpreted by this Court’s decision in Dun-

can v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 (1968), was not

infringed, and Baldwin v. New York, 399 U.S.

66 (1970) should not be applied retroactively to

Be WI ca vcrcchatcansnieninancee bien ianencaie cae: 7

NI es Soccer ke er eee Te 14

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

Cases:

Arnold v. North Carolina, 376 U.S. 773 (1964) ............ 7

Baldwin v. New York, 399 U.S. 66 (1970) ................ 8, 9, 10,

12, 13, 14

Banks v. California, 382 U.S. 420 (1966) 0.00... 7

Bloom v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 194 (1968) ooo... 10, 11

De Stefane v. Woods, 392 U.S. 631 (1968) 0.0.00... 9, 10

Desist v. United States, 394 U.S. 244 (1969) .............. 14

Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 (1968) .................. 8

Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964) 00000000000... 13, 14

Fuller v. Alaska, 393 U.S. 80 (1968) 2000.0. 14

Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963) ................. 13, 14

Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965) ...000............. 13

Johnson v. New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719 (1966) ................ 13

Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1 (1964) 0000. 13

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) .................. 13

People v. Dargan, 27 N.Y. 2d 100 (1970), cert. denied

400 U.S. 920, reh. denied 400 U.S. 1002 (1971) ...... 9

People v. Donaldson, 25 N.Y. 2d 38 (1969) .................... 12

People v. Fuller, 24 N.Y. 2d 292 (1969) 000.0. 12

A A TS TS ES a SE SS aE TT a NN Te 5

II

PAGE

People v. Kaiser, 21 N.Y. 2d 86 (1967), aff’d 294 U.S.

| __ R i a aen et ve crt ge em _ 14

People v. Lopez, 28 N.Y. 2d 148 (1971) aise. oat 8

People v. Morhouse, 21 N.Y. 2d 66 (1967) ................ 14

People v. Tannenbaum, 23 N.Y. 2d 753 (1968) ............ 14

U.S. v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 (1967) 200. .

U.S. ex rel. Butler v. Thomas, 440 F.2d 992 (2d Cir.

1971), reversing 319 F. Supp. 524 S.D.N.Y.

1970), cert. denied U.S. —— (19/12/71) .... 9

U.S. ex rel. Farmer v. Kosan, 440 F. 2d 1256 (2d Cir.

ees Len a enersdceeceinetsirs 9

Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293 (1967) oo... .. 14

Smith v. Mississippi, 373 U.S. 238 (1962) 2000000000000. 7

Tehan v. Shott, 382 U.S. 406 (1966) 000. 13

Statutes and Rules:

N.Y. Penal Law:

N.Y. Vehicle & Traffic Law:

ee ipa c ia ooscensnokees Core wmenavusirrages 8

dal oS hasnowntroraxtaten session 1, 2,3

N.Y. City Criminal Court Act:

ie lace steht So IANS 2 ene a ane a Ee 2,7

28 U.S.C.:

gles EEE ACTOR ne HOC ENON 5

U.S. Supreme Court Rules:

ssn aad cbesveecci bemnchaereiarnonereenisiatanriry 6

ree eemanrs

IN THE

Supreme Court of the United States

Ocioker Term, 1971

No. 71-53

$<

Junius REpwoop,

Petitioner,

against

THE PEOPLE OF THE StTaTE oF NEw Yorx«,

Respondent.

On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the New York:

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Judicial Department

el -~ 9

BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT IN OPPOSITION

TO PETITION FOR CERTIORARI

Preliminary Statement

Fetitioner Junius Redwood seeks a writ of certiorari

to review a judgment of the Supreme Court of the State

of New York, Appellate Term, First Judicial Department,

rendered May €, 1970, unanimously affirming his conviction

of the crimes o1 assault in the third degree [N.Y. Penal

Law $120.00] and driving while intoxicated [N.Y. Veh.

& Traf. L. §1192(2)].