Docket — Cnty. of L. A. v. Mendez, 137 S. Ct. 1240 (2017) (No. 16-369)
Supreme Court brief2017
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
No. 16-369
Title
Docketed
Lower Ct
Case Nos
Decision Date
Rehearing Denied
County of Los Angeles, California, et al., Petitioners
v
Angel Mendez, et al
September 22, 2016
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
(13-56686, 13-57072)
March 2, 2016
June 23, 2016
Questions Presented
~~~Date~~~
Sep 16 2016
Oct 24 2016
Nov 3 2016
Nov 7 2016
Nov 28 2016
Dec 2 2016
Jan 13 2017
Jan 17 2017
Jan 17 2017
Jan 23 2017
Jan 24 2017
Jan 24 2017
Jan 24 2017
Jan 24 2017
Jan 25 2017
Feb 3 2017
Feb 3 2017
Feb 6 2017
Feb 16 2017
Feb 22 2017
Feb 22 2017
Feb 23 2017
Feb 23 2017
Feb 23 2017
Feb 23 2017
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 24, 2016)
Brief of respondents Angel Mendez, et al. in opposition filed
Reply of petitioners Los Angeles County, California, et al. filed. (Distributed)
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 22, 2016
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 2, 2016
Petition GRANTED limited to Questions 1 and 3 presented by the petition
Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either party or of neither party
received from counsel for the petitioners
Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed _)
Brief of petitioners Los Angeles County, California, et al. filed
Brief amicus curiae of Los Angeles County Police Chiefs’ Association filed
Brief amici curiae of National Association of Counties, et al. filed
Brief amicus curiae of United States filed
Brief amicus curiae of Major County Sheriffs’ Association filed
Brief amici curiae of California State Sheriffs’ Association, et al. filed
Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus
curiae and for divided argument filed
SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, March 22, 2017
Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit
Record received from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit. The record is electronic and available on
PACER
Brief of respondents Angel Mendez, and Jennifer Lynn Garcia filed
CIRCULATED
Brief amicus curiae of The Georgetown University Law Center Chapter of the Black Law
Students Association filed. (Distributed)
Brief amicus curiae of The Rutherford Institute filed. (Distributed)
Brief amici cunae of National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, et al
filed. (Distributed)
Brief amicus cunae of National Police Accountability Project filed. (Distributed)
Brief amici curiae The American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Southern
California filed. (Distributed)
Mar 6 2017 Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus
Mar 102017 ~=Reply of petitioners County of Los Angeles, California, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Mar 22 2017 Argued. For petitioners: E. Joshua Rosenkranz, New York, N. Y.; and Nicole A.
Saharsky, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.
(for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: Leonard Feidman, Seattle,
Wash.
May 30 2017 Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Alito, J., delivered the opinion of the Court,
in which all other Members joined, except Gorsuch, J., who took no part in the
consideration or decision of this case.
Jul 3 2017 JUDGMENT ISSUED.
~~Name- ~~~~~~~Address ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioners:
E. Joshua Rosenkranz Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP (212) 506-5000
Counsel of Record 51 West 52nd Street
New York, NY 10019-6142
Party name: County of Los Angeles, California, et al.
Melinda Cantrall Hurrell Cantrall LLP (213) 426-2000
300 South Grand Ave., Suite 1300
Los Angeles, CA 90071
mcantrall@hurrelicantrall com
Party name: County of Los Angeles, California, et al.
Attorneys for Responderts:
Leonard J. Feldman Peterson, Wampold, Rosato, FeldmanLuna (206) 624-6800
Counsel of Record 1501 4th Ave., Suite 2800
Seattle, WA 98101
feldman@pwrfl-law.com
Party name: Angel Mendez, and Jennifer Lynn Garcia
Other:
Anand Agneshwar Arnoid & Porter Kaye Scholer LLPLLP (212) 715-1000
399 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10022
anand agneshwar@aporter com
Party name: The Rutherford Institute
David D. Cole
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation (202) 549-2500
915 15th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20005
dcole@aclu.org
Party name: The American Civil Liberties Union and The ACLU of Southern California
Daniel P. Collins Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP (213) 683-9100
355 South Grand Ave., 35th Fi.
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Party name: National Association of Counties, et al.
William Harry Ehlies I. Building A, Suite 201
310 Mills Ave.
Greenville, SC 29605
hank@ehliesiaw com
Party name: National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, et al.
Aderson Bellegarde Francois Institute for Public Representation
Georgetown University Law Center
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
anderson francois@law georgetown. edu
(864) 232-3503
(202) 661-6721
Party name: The Georgetown University Law Center Chapter of the Black Law Students Association
Gaetan Gerville-Reache Warner Norcross & Judd LLP
900 Fifth Third Center
111 Lyon Street, NW
Grand Rapids, Mi 49503
greache@wnj.com
Party name: Major County Sheriffs’ Association
Martin J. Mayer Jones & Mayer
3777 North Harbor Boulevard
Fullerton, CA 92835
Party name: California State Sheriffs’ Association, et al.
Nicole A. Saharsky Assistant to the Solicitor General
950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Department of Justice
Washington, DC 20530
Party name: County of Los Angeles, California, et al. v. Angel Mendez, et al.
J. Scott Tiedemann 6033 W. Century Bivd., Suite 500
Los Angeles, CA 90045
stiedemann@icwlegal.com
Party name: Los Angeles California County Police Chiefs’ Association
Jeffrey B. Wall Acting Solicitor General
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
SupremeCtBnefs@USDOJ gov
Party name: United States
(616) 752-2000
(714) 446-1400
(202) 514-2201
(310) 981-2000
(202) 514-2217
Christopher Wimmer Emergent LLP (415) 894-9284
535 Mission Street
14th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
chris@emergent.law
Party name: National Police Accountability Project
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.