Petition — Hardwick v. Reese

Supreme Court brief1979

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

Ww VY

mary The Thala Shela: SuyoReme C punt

i ee Pre

Case mo 727-b&Ss”

RECEIVED

JUN 5- 1978

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

SUPREME COURT, U.S.

RX. Bohby Harcus eke D-Q2Q/o

Pet Liomer - At Se

a, Oe

Mes. oon ‘Keese : an a

Lorn tw...And- membees

0 Bored of Farchn 7

ARO

“Ee stoudends

Petihion:: tor vorit of Cebhinent) Ce ae ee

State. Count pat Afeal; toe The PUY Cirnetit

—s

Yh aitias Sek ve:

LR. Bobby HaredwictxDoar

Ga. Dial. 4 Class. Cewtee

fio. Box 33774 B-75

TJAckson, GA. 30233

Pet hioner — Fro- se

/ wd

Tr The Uniled pore Sukeeme Court

Qh BobbLY Hetoloicks 0-220 |

oti boner Ro Se |

wa * ae Case Mo.

Qa. Bobby Hploicke 0-22 )o :

Kebabs ower (om Se |

laine chaees | C Ase. Moumber.

MRs. MAMIe Reese Chena

MA — Ard. mem bers of He| Moki ow toe leave b Fle Stale Bored ot Farcbw And

Stele Reeed of frechy Awd| Awd FRoceed in toema

Thu Regis ‘

Re ae

—_—_—_—__—_—— —_

fefore Mme. Aw AGent. Commissioved to Ad

a ee fo. Se Bobby Hetedunzk . Ask leaw Minrster the oath 1 CAme We Bobby HA Rokvick , roho

am ae Feoteed, on the phbsuken J Lil... Bam atlee being Stooen Under ondth, de hse Ard make's Le

A weak of Ceakionari in this Coued teom the toLlowinl Stalemend , to Wik:

wile Shrles L4L) Ciecuit Court ot AfPeals . ing :

I Am incnecerntled And js wrth out

GAintul emfloYment And is thenetare unnhle ty

teaY AwY Court, Cost. |

atl ke

Am A cisabled Velesan An! theews

V. A. Check , in the Amount Of 7.939.006 te

— eRe

at toate akg

Ld. Bp ciL# D-22/o

WY Ww

ued tbo my Witte And tamily tor the sole fur -

ose Bt talkinG Cree el my ite. Mother And

HeauChtee in that mY wrfe ts uwable to Tally

BulfoeL herself And mY deulhter ,Thenehee, I can-

ob use Ary fortio of thak Check foe Couet CosT

if DL am +o seo that mY wife And tamil/, or

Mees i frovided usd the pecessities OL Life.”

me” oe

On ve About meech ae AfeilL ot 1969 LD became

pune of the fact that ceetein membees of my

emilY had misAPPePRiated’ 0 hu@e sum of my moth

Cs SAvinl eg oe Uhen IL Lenened/ thad sho

ee oh? Recfink hoe sriinls to hee Fema She

APRinted Me her Fersonal Froancral Guredrarw So

hak t could ferotectd. As best LT could , hee Sw

a. << thenetoe immedjatelY pon o? Akedé nov

ae, 1773 6 Ofeaad 5 with the helf of JRL ofc inls,

Arv Pecount mm = 6 MY) ONPMe . beck, with

Savinl £ Loam Ass. in Aulusta. Ca.

Oy oe About maech.b. 1979 this money was

Siscoveted . however, bec Aute LL itd Aw ja dormn fou

feos Acti fenskul LT Reverted AU of my mothe:

‘e

onlY mon -

leg beloning 4 my molten al the Liet fedecal h

Maid

le betme this

“4

ew Nea

Moe¥ brek + hee Cuddy. D Linthee submre tha

TF coh woh hme AnY moneY im AnY Twstibukiero

oR. PwY Flaca else Inn) mY whe ce thal bela

be ne. i fuedher submit thnd V0 foe tion ot tia

10. $45.05 Cons is Bi telendad 4 a

mo Lhea's.

Mite

et ae

LT MA 4: ere ot the Lins ited State « And

ol He stake of Geor Gia Pat CS hilew mYselt.

ent; te thas Fectetss ds uathicl TZ seek.

This CAse ir Vol. ves he Vrolakis one ot my

a Ti. And the due Poocess Clause et te 14%,

prvened ment to the Un ited States Coms héhu tyorv :

; ny a

Thad A l aw Vee Who only Affereed be-Sore the

wiked States LHtth cred Court of APFenl s ,

ouever, LT did nob fay him, Rather. my sick

j him. MY sister is unable to Tay him x Re _

ssentb Mme befre this honmoenble Coaued. Thenetpae,

re CAti&e L CAn not fay tor Counsel to Refeesont

homokAble Cour IL Tray hhak

oq?

~ Ww

APP whet, of Counsel -

ThisePdey’ of Ma. 197¢

And subsetibel tp betwee me this er Jav

C 1998

y MM isSion ed Piees My commission bxpires Fe8 26

this honworOble Court Aone My Atthc heal Motown tor.

‘aD,

ew ww

Table ef Ciobinks

Ta bes

Decisions RE Ss ee ea re eon canes

Jurisdiction of ‘os a — ae ae

Auestions [; woe tn Review anh Sap Ges? ~<a ae

Constitutional Feo vi'siones And Stétuk: cohich

a a a ea en

Statement of cae _ _ a

D@ument AmPLTFinG kKeasons iS 9 Baacdet

vor'L of Cee Lior Ae: jude” lee paar aren — om

a ES i a a

siCnuAture ot N ober _— [ach K

(/’

iiti

obiow ton APPointment of toate .. .— ies

bbion ‘Yor Celeoiky_ _ __ __ ms

ebticnte ot, Ard , vARitica Li oe Oo { adic SS

Pend i x fa Pied A en re ate aE

‘ah ee > at Authorit Vs

COW RR He ob &

duck —v— Caldwell Civil no. 292G. £s,0. Ga. 197D. b

o@RisseY_ v_ Brewee Yoke U.S. 4971.92 S$.¢ch 2592.22

el 23 tu. 1 1998) —

Stas oe Gebefeli: . =. nae g

Seoth_vi Kern buciey Paele Boned wo. 74-G493F . Nov.

4976 Cus. Difiere Comet J — Se ee

S$c.A6PQ —Vv_Unded stats Bond of Pawle 129 F.3d

IR. HIY US. $09 C/973), Sol Fad. 99a Lea. S. g

I a eae ome

erie

a /

Johnson —v— ChAiaman mew York State Bonkd of

els Min 2 Ge TAS OR Dee ee lo

eG Aw —v_-Tbhnsew “7/9 Us, 1015 ee ot Nace yas yume 10

Bead Ford —v_- weinsteim 5/9 Kad. 7a Cca.¥./97974) ~ 10

ol flv. me Wounell .no0.73- 677 U.S. CI97Y2 — ~— II

tld —v—- United Slates Bored of Farole 1974 .167 .u.s.

b APP, Dic. Bee . SN F.2d 1276. 12176 i

wiked state, ex. lel. Richetssn—v— rol. Sas F.2d

ee ek Se. Pe a ea ee 2

suechino —v— DswAL/ .¥30 F.4d. Yo3 LcA. 2.1) - £3

Buetsn —v_Crcecone 4564 Fad 1392 Canes) 3. 45

BeV_V— Conn Boral! Dt Pare £ Parole 443 FId. i076

rn i ree a ras aa ere 1S

piv — Awk: Kaceist Committee 24/ us. 123.71 5, ch.

ES Re 2 By Ginette ees si pargee |

oldbee 257 US, 254 .90.S.ct. 101.25 Libs . 2d

RN ee ae eqearcraerr

ReawKl in__v— Shields 3299 © Suff 2039 CitIsST— — kh

ian y Webi fnl. alo us.4.4% Cast) — 19

Landman. v- Reieten 222 F.suff La! .bs2 CER. vA. 197/9.17

Coldsmith 290 us. 10:46 $.ck. als. 70 Led. 494267 1

torlLl wee 37% U.S, 96 .¢3 S.Ch 1I9S.10. LEd od. 29240%8.11

Shwe 3252S. 232.97 s.ck. 752 Abel Bd. 196 019571.17

Caasen —v— TAVLor foie ee ae mr ee

Bava v— Alaska ‘tet i SOR eae ke

Tn Re. Qe. nt. 96 CSolano County CalrfoewiA

ine 4. i 1A De a ee

iil ] rn

we | ~

ese Vicks 9) Cal. . cer Cie ae

Bowers_v— smith 253 F. Suf 1339 C0. ¢4.19709_ _ 29

CooleY¥_v- SiéLee 3%) fisuh 94) CO-mmn. C™® Drv

ee a. ee Beier

Stewrel, 31 Rsu 444 D0. minn. S Ov. 19990. 29

Cham hees_v_ mississifP 410 1.5. 284.302 £1979) __ _ 22

Coldbedt_v_ KellY 2 tus. 354.469 CGI _. . 23

Kous —v— Norlon Blo £.SufP nisi LV. Conv, (973) —_ ~ 23

Haeeis_v_ Pete 446 Fad. 2is CP Cre 97/7 _ _ 235

Pevell _v_ ke nmued¥__Us. at. Cisse trl

OFRNiow ae SS a ee siddad ae. Ng —

he. OMS 397 3. 1.5 Citiv7y i — = BA

FeeeY Vv _ Sinden mann. 408 Us, SER bol __ 2Y

mec hum— v—_~FFve. Wo. 75-259 us. £/9 ILD APS ei 2S

miller Vv —Thwmey 499 F9d/I61,912. 2/3 —

Hines v-Keenee 445.579 [1999 __ _s sl

Graham—v- Richaedenw Yo3 Us 3BoS,374.9).5-C£ 1545

at . Ge ae Sas Aa — &

Deng viwest VieGiia.dF Us. HY ,/23 C 189) #7

th be «abt hie Sh Ss, SW Cf Men). 27

Ghannis —U- ORdean 2345. 385 CIW/YD _ _ 29

Cousin. v- OLivee — No. 73-460. 8 L ECO VA. Dan.

sce oe SO eaten Ba

Bell tel Phone ey Bee lublic rides ioe : ok ake

ce eee ee St CED)! = oe

StawLev¥_v-Tllinsis 405 us. &YS.3! Ad. QI.551. 94

Fe a ae. a 27

Koskee —v — meGinnis 492 F.3d 195 Cera. 2.1897) D . 29

iiitif

ow A

Switdach— v— Family fiwane CoeP, 29¢ lis, 337

Seeaetr

ieagueal

Ste CFrse.

Vw ar

is The ‘luited Stale. Sufreme Court

Q. BobbY Hhpalucies 29/0}

id teek . Teo se

ete: l\CAse poo.

Mes. MAMie Keese « ChAie —

WwoMAn— And. Mem ber ot |

the tole Boned of Te! wart ot Cerkioraei To

oe ae The ok? ste Do

Kaa ree ee leas Court ol Dfieal.

The Most HhrweAble Chief Justice —An/_ Assoc -

iAte Sustices et the United Sha tec Suflreme.

Cours ‘

Comes Nobdlw Pebrh, one Fev se Ky. Bobb y

Hardie .el . And Res fecttully feay thak A wrk ot

Cen bicene; issue to Revieros A Dud Gemenrd, Atud oP.

INI oN of the Unihed State Lthh Cieeurk C ouat

of Affeal., enteeed) ow maY 3, 1995 Atlaemink

the decis fon ot te Lower Court 1 the Above

WY A

Ww VY

2 ee ae 5 pee — Vout chicken LE EW ol Reviews

The Uni Led stolec Distatet Court ton the Noets - i

(des tthe Cont lL ict thabk feecon k Ly exrsk bettvcc

the FALLb Cireeurk And Lhe Pilih nb « ite the Secavd

ueth, sSevewth , And the Aystect of Columbus Gra —

rhs Court of Affeale . So tre As the due Feo

Ss faotee bien that Shoul./ be AHoedlod A FRison-

in Re ARs to A fAevle Peuceed inl , Reach such

Roforkion Ais ta Circum vend the Stiedead bo

be Afflied .se fre as the cue feocess Clause

is Cyncerned_ OukinG A . ele Aine! feobnten

Pinbs, As ofdeted unde thie couets Rulings to

oekiss <V_v_ Brewer 1972 , 40s Uns. 47) 492. 9a Sch

oo ee Es. ad 98 Pind Galo _v.. S caefell;

I Us. 999 £19739 ?

wn Wrst ol Ga. Atlacta 0; Vision, clenied keljet

me ed, 7, 197 *

Or Doce. 2°), 19997 Celik onen Sile/ Ar APfeal ino

the FLL), Cikeuit Court of AfRals And on MAY

3.199¢ thal Court iSSued Okdeg AfLeminvl the cle.

Cision ot the Louwee Courd.

Pes of Court.

Dues rs en pt this honoeAble Couet iS pv Lo kal

fuesu Anct bo a€ Usic. 1264 CID And Arkicle at

Betion 2 £1) of the Uniked Stale Cons bitutow.

en ae

a é freole A zi ae ER | l sherk : Re fee sent —

C An inwdeve st Cr Lidl in the feo spechiic far-

lee Che fkocess Protec tion befoee Lhnt “Cond E

-_-_— -—_ Seal — _e— ____

Pet, 8 athe Feet

a. om

VY Vd

ihionwal L :beely * CAw ke denied him?

Des Hardloek Arve A Richt bo Inmsheet Lhe records

ON which the Res forde nts bAse/ Lhere Geanvtin£.

oR denVing tohin ot A Parole -~And— does

Hancock have A RiIGHL to A FRRole hearin

where he caw Rebut AnY Adeese euidence that

MAY Lk in his Preole f; les Awd otter Add i Se

AL facts to suffort his Release On fareole ?

Nesal A

Silennd ot Case.

Dw Dee. 19,/9469 Youe Rbtower LoAs slleCallY Ar.

Rested ton the Alleled ceime bt Bank Robbery.

Becruwe the Jedegal. Government, did nok desine ts

‘Llecally tey Heedork for Bank Robseoy Ley ol is .

missed ALL Cheebes AGCAinst him. AL that Lime

the state of Geoelia Picked uf the CAse And

Re-chreCed him worth ArRmed Robber V - No Che

WAS hued. OR Kid al Reel sual this Allela/ Ro bb —

eey,

On Dan. 8/990 lun folitronee LUAS Leiel ne

te Couet And Convicted! , tLleGALl , ol OMe Cou

nb eAch of Aemed/ Kobbee y And ACG. AssAuLHt » He

This cAse involves Amendments IZ. . Ard |p eed te tee ite Oca ene tow Vows

the due Process clause of the os: a Amend - oy wre

ment tp the United Stakes ConstirLu dun.

C ons brbcdfeuinl TRoVisiens And stat-

utes whieh this C Ase

in Volve <

— 0

~ Please note that had HArdwicie been chre re pen

ptied Joe Brnk Kobbeey runder fedeoenl Sklakule

"0 Senteneed, 'f Con Vic te, Lo

o ™M th ye ARs

Hi aga tor the Cum tahich,“mosne thad

Bue > 6 Rison Y Now ‘5 Ale

thal ant Sole Re fon 2evinl an

ds a hin ® Ls i ins Rison, a

= a -senteuvce.

jhues

me. ae

wal A

Ow AferL 17,1972 the United States Orstesck co-

uet fore tHe southeam Dit of Gr . Aulrslar Drv.

Reversed his CeiCiwal Sentence 7 with instr vietesons

thal, Your Retilionee be erkhec ke tried Or Kelen-

Sd tom Custal y cutth in six Month,

Qv MpAech 13.1973. Some eiCht » wok. Six Ae

Ehe Count ordered, months After te Abovemen -

Eiowed orden, felitsonen was ttied foe tHe second

me, + tSus Lime, however. he hrd been hastsLY . And

tLlecrLly , Re indie teal wol onlY -fox the CRiGiwAL in —

diclments bud he WwAs indicted cn date beand MCLE

indictmenste AG Avast 4Wo of the CusTomes

twho WAs itn Lhe bank ‘re 1969, Hue ven. this Time

Hrrduick wars AGAin Convicled illeCally And sen, —

Leneel ty two Lite hi: tux ten Wear sentence

these fille the sentence: he Now Sekle,

Heed rele Fiesl beame elGble for A fatole fv

Qe 1996 He Luops denial fFatole mt thal Lime?

ble became elibvble FGA‘ Dr Rec. S79 but AG Ain

he LuPs denied Parle ¥:

WY Y

PR:on to Rac . 199% lhun Reb bi'sner LOR obe SeveeAl

letters do the Gatlodends Av! ottee ollicial.

of the State Bored of Parc An] FARole borne

keAuecting that Lhey Allows him recess Lb the a.

@ wok he would be Grawted on dicted A Paesta

He Fuekhea Ref nes le./ thrd {aN ae app Grant bo

him en but Kes Ponslents denie.Z/ ALL of his

OW ok About AfaiL 19, 1997 Rediksoner Frle/ A

iv. R io hb Col pind And Mobi'bno toe inured ye Re

ret in the Ins. Ore. Couel foe The toedjen,, A)'sT.

aA therein , not ad Loni ot Hp bens CoRPug§

bid. Rother . Tv Tinchy ve Relief LY ordeninl Lhe Rec _

Srdent tp Cortoem tp due Feocess in there Parole

Feocess, Dw = OcT. 7/979 ; without A henriné OR A

how CAuse okder, the Abovemen tioned PO'sTR ie.

unt dicmreseal Hed wick CAse for FAiLure Te

late a Claim wus iohich Relief caw fe GRAncxL ~

. tuheteuhr. he Filed Av APRal tp, th, Site

- +02 “Tha “Lert Res PonsJen Tt LoR OE Handy, ck denya . 9

his = exhi bil ‘B" of Dee Rinitoaek Thal

A ed to hic Briel jn, Ce Sh Crcyd.

4%. Seo HAtduk—v~ CAl dual »CIUL 6. 2929.05.0 GA

1992;

5. See habit Cec Athache/ heee Zo |

lo. ODO a i

_ b_

VY Y

Circurt Couel of APeAl.. That cord AtLiame./ The

Lowen Court And he Moved Luith the inesTALT AcT ior

oe thes A evoen ble Court:

Arlumert. Am AYH4ia C Rensons tor

Gerawkinl, Lurie ot Cuarberani

The deci sitw bY Lhe Cound

belwe demovstenle's Lhe

existence of An GvoRMous

CO ontLred be tue Cireeurks

As to the sladrad &A kh

AfPLied , SO FAa As He due

ocecs Cl Ause the lw-

ited States Corstitubion, inv

ReCrrd: tb A fhrole fRo_

Geeding is Condetued, AS

+Ashiowed by bhis honworA-

ca ae

WY rd

bd Couet in MORKRISS1e Y

Vas Deus Rad 6 a

GNon—vV_ Senefell; ahaa]

Tw Shoe 4 the Above r Ssue fre sent’ the (ssve

et thal slendaed is tb Le aAbPlied in ReGands tp

A Pevelective™ i Arle fRocecds nl. Dnde ik i's tound

thal he have: eAcned the £icht to fAweole Con ~

Side eakions.

Thie honorAble Court , heretofore , laval= dd Ged

wwith* ever feotessioval Ribivbanioss . the ReSol be

ol LHe Comflicl in Le crecuits below As to

whrd SLand red 1So FAR As dhe Peicecs s/c Con-

derned , must be Afflie! ts Farle Considecak

iow. Jo be sure see SeoT7—v— Kentucky

Fae —

ole Bonnd. No. 749-6438. Nov. 1976 Crus. SUPReme

Cour _ _ RemArnded be Courk of Afferle toe Con -

Sideantisw Of the Question of Mmos7Tnress ); Scarfa

_v— United Slates

VAcA bed And Rem Anckee toe Consider AL on otf MoeT-

ness 414 U.S, G04 £19930. AsMisced As

Fad . 792 Lean. §.1993): Dohuson —v— Chaieman

oe. YoS Us, 471.92 s.c4 .2593 233 L.Ed. 9d. 4s¥ £1979)

mew. Yl Us, 178

Pore! of Farle Y77 £.22d.-278

Moot, Sol

—

. Faaclee er

veiw Vork State Boned of fheole 500 Fad. Faslca. Dlee frd offew or Dlheos,” morrisseY Yos Us . ad

2). Vacated As Moot Sub. wom: KeGane ve Johnson BY"! SwPy ad ~ Revocation feoceedin£s chtee-—

419 US, lois EC 18949): Bradtoed— L— Wein STern 5/9 Bmine's tadhe thes hes Farolee coil] boo Free oR fpr

F,24.92¢ Laan.¥. 1994) vacaled AS met 423 U.S Bfison A mrllern at obvious Creal Moment tp

149 L975). him moesessey sufeh. See . Alco wolt{ UL mt Row

Even thouch this homoeAble cout have ot well .00.93-679 Us. C1979) Likewise “A Parole

sfecificallY Altacke! Ard KeSolved te flesent Co feoceed inl clo tee mines whether the Prose hi ve.

coal 3 mes Fay Rage iat re eee eee ae i ee er

j in e e 2 Bweivstein SIV + 2d. 12%. Cen. 4.19747

4 have howmably And frol, ovALLy bkhac ke. d

Mave hove ge er ciao 5 te This Court, Foathee Ruled in mokersseY SufeA

hesol_ve J the mrtter ot due Peocess jn fAgole %

Revocation PeoceedinL£s in sks Rulial in MM vee - thal A Phtole lors A Conditioval Likeet” sub -

isseY__v- Brewen sSufen And Gabnwon-v— Scrarefhel/, at tp hut Peocess FacTachion: Lived Sine.

suPen. Yerdworck feel’, , db beeaheite that the trl +hat this Court hrve established thrk A Prtole iksclt

bots the fPevle Pevceedinl Ard the fAgvole evo- is RA A CondrLioval lLiberby ” the 9 vALUAkLe fan 2

BA. (PRocesdiné Ate Gtounled in the "indenecd* Memes of this Condibteonl Lilet’ mud. be eta

Che tecl by the Cond rtiowal. Libkeety j A FARole ut VALewt Le the Lass imuolved in Fatole ReUocA -

ollas theVY Ave insefaknble So tae As the Liow thal mandates due feocess FloTeckion Child.

pheention OL the due feocess Clause Of Lhe mu ‘lithe! Shale . Fone! of Peeole . 1974. io? tenS

IM? Ameniment to tHe Us. Conshtution.h be Be ap pe Lot + SI) Fad. 1270. 1295.

Sure This cournl held im mMoeeisse¥Y subs Lhat In mortisse¥Y_vu— Brewer suka thi Courk nor

Lhe fAkolee, in Revokinl his FaRole, may “be el thal “ 35% 1S %

five!’ of only ‘Cocke ae ae ‘45% of All Preoles Are

the Less, miLicks A‘ GRievpus Loss’ on the far-

ey” Me my | an

w Na

Odds, he Retains A ConeinuinG interest Ih the

ole re lense henecinls . theeetue. this Couel MmusT

Hiioval issue OF che frocess

A PPRole Fevceedin£. in thal, this Ques hi tn

ex teemely im foelavt. IL's man rfesk imheTan fe

1S Diatactetile Ly CA) the VAsL Number ot Ar.

ole Release decisions th aks M Ade eAch Vene:Ch)

the im forLAnae ol each such ec ision to Lhe Ree

Son attec-leal by sts And Cc) the extensive.

U-LiGation , with VARY uC Resulks , ahich hrs devely-

hed in the +tedeeal Courts. Comfare the insTanT

CFse , Chere the +444 Ciecut Court of APReadc

Puled thel Hrrduncl cvors not entitle! Lh he

FRocess , wilh Lhe follow sal: Un ileal States ex. Rel ,

Richerson _V. Woltt .S25 F.2d. 797 Lea. 9.19 752

C due feoeess APPlres th the extent thal weik-

$. Sea Alco Dushie

lw ScolT v— K cky

evens verV elobuent dissent

PAgole Bored el. AL. Sua.

Vo Kked 4 suaely As LornG As A Phtolee frees Such aw <trtle ment OL. ReAsonus must be Given foe chess

Peoce dures Which will be folloued ak ature Pre. | Bendtoed_v_lveinstein Suen, Cdue Feocess APA)

fie, Find rool Lene ‘en Awoltee cAy, the Con -PuNiel Slals Gored of fikile suten. Cohec foe

a ‘ a ¢ : Sa apeng APPLies to the extent thrL keAson MmucT hey

salt er,

iaL OL Frecle ) Coed. cdomial .125i.5.9/4 C1996):

vecAted As moeT 423 Ws. 199 0/9959; Chills —U_

Given); Dohuson —L— ChaiemAn. New Vors BoArd of

fArvle C Soo. & 3d. 925C Ca.3) due faocess

APPL ex Lb the extent thrd Rencsons Muet be

Civen ) vRented As MoeT sub noms KeGan _ U om

STohmion 419 US. 1015 C1979)3 Scarfa—v— United Sta-

Les Bone ol freole 177 +, 94 fe Cca.s ep

banc) Cdue fRocess ches nok APPLY) Vrcate/ Ax J

Rem ts Con sidec MooTness, T/9 U.S. S09 C/973)

dismiss ed As mosT Sol F.2d 992; Menechine

—V— OCdwakd. 730 £.2/ 403 CcA.2./990) Cdhue

feocess cbes foot APPLY to Far ole herent me

Aietioned in Tohrson .Sufen ). Ceel. denie/ Yoo

3S; 033.6190! J: See Also Rinten Cretan .Y8kY

4.344 i399 FC ca. ?.1993 ) 0 Seecle’ bore! mic

toll ow rks own Rules but imblyrerLly AolalnL.

thr due FRocess- abes wot APPLY iJ

As demonstrates Above te £% Citeu LZ shoul

oul , with the exce Phan ot Owe OR Pe othes

Ciecurls, Alone in Retire snul tp Accord due.

Fae) <:

Faocess in A frole FfReceadinL.

This h orweeable Court CAnnol, And Sustain ra

histoerc Role oR i£% Conshri tion al AULY, COA)

ates to evrde the Resol vind ot the Consk i but -

‘owal issue ol due PRoce<s ite far ole Fo ceed sn.

Is Count must , theretone . Act NbLo to kesol ve

this icsue XS that Lhe feesent Conflict , Am cab

e Circuits, may foe ever he Prerested And A sta-

wdrtd ettected thereby ALL the cincures will ¢m-

pec ly frotect Pevshackive fréslees Constitution Ad.

RiGhds b> che Peocecs At (Abo le Peoceed inks .

ee & 2a

A frele is A Condition al

Liberty Refhesen taint, fai” jem

Lenest the Lass _ bY A fo —

sfechive frRolee. t: enTJoV

would subtecd the Frosh.

ec tive FArclee to sutter A

Gr revousS Less, enrtr£lin

the Frosfec bjue FAR olee dhe

Process AL A Far ole fRoee~

edinGs betpre tha valua_

ble Liberty Cew be a him,

hh,

Ww VV

his Court feo fee LY hel. I MokResseV SUPRA

theaL A fProle Was incleed ee Cond rLioval Lifa

eoLly . Re foesentinsl AN ; interest i Sinta ‘ts - Abs

bendy been decided thal A Faeole i's A Con-

dikikcowal LiberLY Refeesentinl An inkeresd 'b mug

Hollow that Lhe LasT, by wot bLeinl Gente the

Richt ts endoY this Liberty,” subteck's Lhe Pro-

Sfee-bive Farclee to the sAme dele; vatrorn As A

PAcolee Who's Re-sent to feisonm And CA No

Lonwben endo this Libeely, Thaite tone betore this ie

eekly is akrused A foosfec hi ve Faevlee. he must

be ACCokded due Ffeocess: To hold other. lise

would be ty Create A dishinetiow Loo Geossl Y

thin te stand ElLene An vl vsis : US. ex. Rel Dha-

Sow —v— Chnieman 506 £.2d. 925. Y/%. Uns. sols

95. 8. CL. 986.49. L.Ed. a. AB. C/97I9): see Also

Haymes. 595 F.2d S¥0C/97D). Th vs wot FAre

bo ; AtLech Gneatee imfor-tavce te A Person's Juss

ity AbLe ReliAnce thy Maiwtaivin his Conditirowal

freech

3s ei to his mere exfectak/on

oR hole ol Reecbm, ” BY_v_ Conn. Board ot

Fhadow + fArole 443 Fad fore Len. 197/), be—

Cruse the tacToe . As to tether Avy PeocedurernAl

Y Y

Robec-bion is Z due | de fends Orv cvhe ther To ted ly

(dual will be Covdemned to Sutter A Grievous

loss : Dore Ane _ Fascist Committee. 34/1 Us. 123

1 .S.c4. ba4.95 L.Ed. 917, see wlso GoldbeeG 37

us. 254.90 Sch. 1011.25 .L.E). 2d. 287. The denial

Faz vle : usd, ss Viewed As A Geirevous Lass’

ee Stale Poacd et fArole 19974. 164.

1.5. APP D.c. RCS. Sil L.2dd 1Q2P0 ./278: See Also ten-

w KLiv—v— Ohields 399 F. SuPP. 309 L I97s J

The FPreole board hold the keY bbe Locks

of the Paison G Ales. TL P7285 es Lhe Fovwen te Geark

On len 2 Liiditioval L ‘boot? . Ty the exercise

of ibs beord discretion ry MR kes Tud6emen& a ae

Cleenin£ the ReAdiness ot An nu MPAbe. to ne ee |

himselt in A MAwner ComPatille with the twe lL

bein ol the Communi! And himéelf ot the Phe-

phe boaed decition ts neCakive the PrisoneR iS ;

defeireved of : Conditional LibeeLy” The Resulds

of the be Aeds C XCRO ise ot Lis dis eretion 1S that

Aw APPLic. Ant esther Sullers A GRievous loss

62 GRins Comditia al larg 5 > oe

' is ub dantial. The Pato Le ec iS/on ere —

yg gg Guarded bY Minimum sta ndatok

ot Oe. Roc ess of LAw

eee ee

Aid at the sAme Line 2

Naa? Nal

Reflect the reed Of the froole Sistem bb Kn.

Chia Consistently vurth 7 Rur Pose. Aiud Res fons i ben

ee cS ae Pee oe Slate role Board <ufka. ‘

he i eothabines ot due fooeess mS the froTect jon

of iNdividual AGAiwsd Rel:LicreV Ac tion i tool Hv —

Mc Dowwell. no. 13-699 Lu.s.s.ch. 1974). There's Wo

Genel where the "tetdield tor Abuse, hense Ar .

b; Loney Loca lment, : "tes More cleenlbolh than ala

rQoLe fo. teed i . Sehec iALly vo hen, the ev idence fin

2 most Fach »1n the Pato lees Sle ‘ that. bo he

Sie the Perole Boned Comes feum 7 A One

Sided disei! Linney Fao Ceechng .“” '° Gneene~v_ me EL eo

SuPen. See Alse Lanelnan_v— Ro¥<teg 332 £ SuPP L£21.b53

PED. va. 19917.

r fhe sent enoment of A feo te clable interest Is

Mot A fre Re AU side oft ue Feo tess Bi Goldsm-_

th 290 US. 117,46 .s.ch. 215,90 Led 44y £19267"

D— The. atisciPlinanY PeuceedinG is So One Ss

the trimAle Until here mud be

Ans the AlleCe./

inmPte $1, ww hero Cee y

Point must be at Aecle febcmedsnul.

Also UnvLllwer 3932 US. Glo. &3.S.Ck. IIIS. fo Ll Fe

atl, 224 £I963) And schume 25? 5. 232,77 S$.

- Od: 79. C989).

a err

=» H7-

tone

Cess cl ruse

VW Ne!

One adoes pot have & be out on fae —

OLe hence en DoVin'

iw onder toe him Le be Protected BY the due Ses.

his . Conditional Lilorty *.

a: |

Hfted ick have the Richk to

iwseclL AnY ReGords that's

Ava; Leable Lo the Preole

borad on which they base

Lhe . ee As a tuheth.

e2 to Geant on aenY &

him Parole. Hardkuick Also

hrue the Richk bo a hene-

inG wheteow he CAn kebut

AuY Aduekse orn eRRoneous

infor MAbion thad's ir His

farole file And Paesenk ey_

idence And Jon wibnesse Ss

bp sufbe t. his Basi Lion thal

he deserve A PARole Anl

oR the evidewe i AS he.

Ole Frles is inectheat OR oud

dated,

—IF’..

Comwsrdecatron of ‘teha dk Peoceduaes deuce Fzveess

ReQuine Linder ot Cikcum-

stan Ces muck be Gin with es de Ler mruatkion of

tHe frecise wAkure of the Goveewment Liiwebion

inVoLued Ac well As of Lhe fraivale trrteeest Lh-

ab he. beer AtecLeS Ly Gusmasmnanl- Action _ td

AL FIS MoreisseY . YOR us. aL 49/.

This Couek ha Alterly deciJed tha a Paeole. ix

"A Condidbiowal Liheely * ee Soe ae re aa

A fAtolee thereto. See moglessey sulea.. Thr Cou

RL hrs Also Ruled thal A tevocndon " fevecedin£

detea Mi tues tuhelhen A Pavol ee vorLl be dee OR

PRiso nw A matte of Obvious Grent Moment bo

him ~ MokResse ¥ Sula. Since tk Cawnut be dened

thal A “Patole Posceedint dete

inmate cui Ll leo Ree

that, A fershec tive

tht

" Onc, ex. Rel. bhasov—y_

MAnv Suf2a. Theretone A Pros fec tyve

13. Childe_v_ Undel Stale Berg]

Chain

(Arolee Mus 4

ol Preolec Sufen.

=f FZ...

VW * A

Me Aétordad due fences As outlined in moree.PeekinG Revente ™ of “in the case of A Racist

Sse y SuPea. seo Ales GAC non ~~ Senehati- suRA rtd , Urrudic Abe their ather wise Absolute ue

Tha Second Ciacut’s Recent decisiom in Unrled SH over the mew Undea theie Contol. : see alse David

Bes .€x. Rel Cansem_v_Tarloe extends APPLicatyon of mo -V- ALrcka Ws I914 . There. i be No —

RtisseY te Rehuinre Lhat Lhe Panlee fh Ac ponaL =meaws for Resolvind ComtRowtabron And Ouestov

Actual cae ys Used ACAine him a = £ Yat withod Peovid nul Contenbab on, The Most

vo cAtion henting .” The Court im CAgsern Aeasuied ie rms Me. Dustroc mereshnll ukom Dushice Bremman Doin —

this was the onlY way bo Avoid “exfosing A harolee in dissent in Paed in wwolft-v- me Qwrell suP-

ts A csubslantal Risle of Recommrbmend tion the | The only fsible wav tre Hecho cle to be

basis of e2k&Ronwevus imPRessisw of Conclusions Gleund Able bo fhefane fon Dis ~ Corfe tation 's Eo

ed OM inmMuend © 02 exaccena Lisw AS disdinGurshe of be Accorded Access by the Kes fonelenrds tiles

‘ verid red Fret 2 Trcleed “a fatsle heaeint Lull ca tuhich P by ALL ined rc etl bres , Contains CRRoWe ous »

VARI Able Buen om dishuted Duestiow of Fracks the. RevenGetul . Rrcict And DeALous’ iy st tucled/ dnkna.

The ull ae 7 ecsPL inset rene becnuse in bomh The Couel in Tw Re. Qe. nw.Gu6 CL solane

me ecision ULL Apue Ay imPact aon his ab Couwby calitoevia Suferion cl. Qec. 11.1973 OD Rul-

iLy Ly Nw mo ™ 7” a = te |

a o wit. te lt, TA th, rel Allee! cnc.

Elon tp Reveal isteake. { d roti oe ESS b his Rec oftels that: Lised Ly Lhe FA eole boa-

BL cones this sy os taaaae gf ~y OF Fu Ley fee — kd ton ther doLleamin Atyon As to cohethon Lt»

Cause Hetduirlke have Aleerdv,, bY Aacddevt, Cmtat. Bio Beno om

: (U_ The, vect is Obvious ino this Case becAuse Haddix .t

ResPordonts in some eltors. '* There 6 2 Siow rticant |

Polential oe Abuse ot the Freole foveess bY” Persons| pated LY beth Peis tind Prcele Olficials bechuse he

WY i

¥ h q Ss,

mrtivated by MpLiee ’ Vindicbrveness inks leeAnce , rege Lafond ry i ey oF er ak ye

PReDudire aK Jealous! - Greene_v_- Mc ElRoY sufen. GoinG be of fe e¥ Hhave'nd AitoLa! HAtl is .< IC

tthelhee these be other inmates O20 Tieom Lunes — ——_ Lutits. See exhib, Co a a

B- See exhibl .*An* a

the GS? Cineut . Se Attache! to Recon hy

os - P

VY Y

7 Y ow,

Geant poe deny BP fAede Lo ie The Court below formes out Lyre thi. Co ~

! »1N ~mMokResseY supra, has nob held Lhat Jie

| eat a wi dise Lesun o re Coole! Peucess feolectron extends to A Wkole APPLicad-

vata ere Le tor fee Ei oven to resent Cou ion henai ul. "The Mke Mm Portanrdt Point ) fe et a

Lhal tin fenes Pe i the ih fatde Rone! 3 may ) Feel »Should be Lbnt this Court Ae foe tine,

in MollesseY sulen , thal due fhucess obe. Not

Attech shelf bo A Ftdle Roceeding And Chal

(4 lace hoo et

Me “Pte Mede Lie wader :

Rersoned ihm Tone Guta hs pitas OO ke heme. heme To Oh)

Acc « PD: O .

eli ju Ramee Te eect hgh the Bana et asf ts. Bah Si a) ha

cy Pas et Ios CC 1Si OW ae & Ge rid gg OT FY Lan Lhnt of Aw ACA uUse/ Lp fre sent

Tn Semklin bv. Shreld. 399 £. Sul Z07L (Vis 20 grat y Bye-nage » Replay Aeogges nedae

to Cound, ketuited the bowed to Kemd” 22. is elie wosed “hallen one View if “AS A Acne

De i nee) Paces te Unie Clambend. Povbated Fivilebe om A Conditiowal Drhcte

at , re ae es Prete menble ime ce A, rs Sho. l fins tarry AC Reed bal the Teucess by

aay age mn ae The de, F IUhich Government Chases 4s led MAn, Go tee

fess RiSomer 4 fZes de fRi'v 2! Dien: ot- Rery ‘Le torlh his fanily Ae-Ler Vere Of -eced

Dis Richt by Mivimum hie Protec: in FA FARde E 3

nb. See Alss Cooley 1 _ SiGlee 32¢/ £6 y) [I5- see Also Gold Gexb—~U-Eelly 397 Us: I5Y Db? Tien)

EA minn. S* Dv. 1994): ee eae ae Moeeessc¥ Sufea, OQwws_v_ noetsn oo £ Su ;

774 C*. Minn. 6%

NSIC. Conn. 1993]. HaeRic_v.. Pole YY er

Oyv. 1969777 316 LT Cit. 199) J. = :

a5 wwe

=, ~/

Rertion , O?, Keef him AiwBY +Qom thad famiLy,

asd on A Powel such ps A FArde Borie - which

ASES there alec ison Cro : oes woul hAwve Sez —

lous insurY Uru thal i ndivrdund ec Recinl ly rf

ef Choose Lo Continually Keo f him ite Prison, !

dinect Re Cried Lo this : SeRrous thu ay ; thes

Count in Geone Ve me ElLPY Suffern Sard CRoss

@ AMivAbron Aad Confeontatom must be Peamitt-

whenever Goveenmental AchLin serisuslY in Jp.

Res frm fhdividual And the ReawwAbleness ot

te action cefencls 6 fret Lindin Le : [ emPhh-

is Ackled _) This Court, Coenk on to spy Lhnt

wy A

Cess fiehses fs i thene ARe Rules ae " mut-

tueally exPlic et Unde tekand inl .” that suber hr

e@ MAY invoke AL A hearinl.

“he l owen Court ArGue's thal Mokkesse¥ SULA

4 wot extend te A freole henesnl becAuse. ha

, sé RemAinis ins C.ULTod Y ne This a ee however

is un teuntle, he cause RL the Hon. ma. WUuSsTits <7

Ves > o) e/ vhuently Shake! ny hrs dissent ey

eAchum—v_ Fane ‘Nb. IS~ 25 us. C97 ™ Kea

rary Fagole ~ merely Godt nnnl ; Anv/ it

Nok swleceu PL the Stak, LeGal CusTod! on

fheolee Theneforo in View of Lhe Fact Lped

PAY srcrl Continemenl, LArch I's Le feoskective Fae.

bles. in thie CAse Heeloicle . And Leal CUS Tool y

— inte fh -Obe

fuscess As in OV oltee Like Feoceedine. [Aue A" ("if geal er mace

Xist wi febalL Cust, hence Acdup/ Contive-

Th feeay_v_ Sider m Aan 708 US, S93. Lol b. see exhibid> 67-56 Cal = ek Birel =, —

Court sRid thet A feeson's interest Try The | 5 Creu . TL 2 Ng ge Fei ay PL,

bewell ic a ‘ frokeyV interest F52 due Reo “Tie mubu cally ax fLtest padets Tanai in Lbs CAse

“ss AR

1S RL

‘el he Ab e td

i? spa iu exhi bil "6 he ered hs pee,

2Y aii i

Peobented Ritht. ReMAin .

Be Auce MokResse/ Sufea ss

iLed by te dc ticety om Lecuve

t Arid Conditional Li bee Ly

well ne the ity

United Stale ex.rel. m,

wor. WA, 913.

See ] g. Geraham—v

In Sociely, +b Refuines thal df . Bi

gad substan tial cle Peivatisn ot the Liberly

6 ieee A due Relp/

fer Le inbene st ol the tudiviaual

* oF thal Suh stantal Se.

Cmernt of cue Evtal SociehY, Refresenta/ by

Mrrte's , Ke Quine'c thal MokkesseV he So Red,”

Llee_v—TiwmeY 479 £. 94

Hatdi'cle cAwnod., theretwe, Le aefaiveld ol Hix

LibenLly 07 ProferLy iwtesect. : sa seebinael ghee Peo —

PY ae Sas Haines_v— koa rer WY 5. S79 (i972)

— Richprdson 403 Ls. 3LS. 294. 9

S.ch 184¢ 241. 229d 53Y LIGUVI. Ane Us. ex.

Nol NAR RoALY Lim

: fai dive rAd l ne-

ue Feve ecs PRe

inmate 1A

Ip ~

\nee/ /

Ment , RursuAnd to Aonwvic tion. The de Pav ua kon ot the. Vanda Mental Re QU icite of due Phocess ot

Libeely follow inl Ato Ad Jud rcatron ofl Guilt i's

Prat ial . Not total . A Residuum ot Conmstrbu bron al. KellY 3271 Ls. D54- 264. ?

‘ "Tw Hon, Me. Wushre st

Evens writkinl torn the MADLY te

Citeurt itm Motlessey —p_ Bre wer Suen,

ta ta he OPboa Luna Y to be hennd Z Gold Geal

The tack that. Haekuiik js che a heard fo

Sevents Jor to Re ¢ orden dew Verb Cr Geanvbnl him A fae.

ole iS Auiethen Su PPpetedd iho Rha trceek UiaGsn-

fa 129 4.5.4 193 CiesG). Tn te. Buttale 290nKe

“Reel “oon BYY C1%5) Ped Geanars—_v— Otdern 224 .s.2eS

fu Tan OWT -

Ciely ),

Cusins—L— OLiven .nwo-73- Ym R. LE... Jan,

19949.) in A Similan VAin esid thal “due troe

Cess mMmeAnw thad Aw Adm ito igen hive. bly , Act-

WG im AN Ad SudicatoeY Cafae:t¥ And About

to embrel on A datiletin. , At oed to Persons ta

be Atle. Ly the iM honsel inl decison , the ofP-

ot kun bY fresenL PrnV mntktee Relevant ki ids

delee munkiow ” See alse Bell “Tele fhowe—_v—~ fub_

en’ Lit Lites Commyn, ol Bhie Sol US. 279. Zoo.

304 C 1936] Shley_veLlLinors YoS US. 645

Bl Ed. Od. S6!1.98. 5.04. laos C1979799. soske

—v—- McGinnis 742. €. od 198 C64. 8. @5l. wes

bhava ~)

f-See Also: Toint Anti Fascist RefuGes Comm. —v- Me — |

Gerth 341.5, 123 16%. GaGnon wm <—pr Pell; su fea,

—~v— Burson Yo. 45, 535 SwiAdach_v_

FamiLY Furance Corl) 395 1.5, 329

— 87.

ee alee sy ee

erble Cound Geawh Tetihion tor Lorn

broene North Lure A Awd Lorth bu L clef AS.

Ti-kZAAY ot 199

toherelone Voun felbtrouer Tray thad this hur.

Nae

NV a foe APhoi'nxtmen Z

Counsel.

Comes now Jour Tete tionen "T2u~ Se Ke. Bobby

Hand ich And M Ove thr Arorsoe able Ceurd Lo

PPPrint Counsel foe him ow thic Actin bec-

Ruse he KS without Funes ds Retain One fon.

himself. LC Sue AL: davrd AbLached to his bts.

fea:s ALL dauit AtLa «hed herek, —).

fp. PB. b by HARdwe ick

D-2QA/o

fre & lower Feo Se

SWwWppr - Anal subscribe tp ae oe Mme Lhe nV

My MM VSS ion “EX Prec ~ “mentee expires ei 24 a

SitnwAture of Notan/ fublic, x. w/a

Feng

Fa a Pee Me Pe ere

where fore fom Relshwec

Aowon Alle Count APPoindt Counsel ton this

Taethwrlh.

Thi. SO lay of hea. 1978.

Ten y thal this

CALe

Ewow te And Subscribe! to Lolm

191 €. f

SiGwAtuce of wolvev Fublic

My Commission oxfiraes

~nie t

a YY

Motor for Cel eart-¥

—————

Oz. Bobb) Hrecbuizk, Febitvoner Fao—se , Cone

usual Seed thy ate dis Position of Fhri's CAce,

ma C2) “He fam Already Serve! pyrne Yerns

, ta? Ae eooulal Apve been, Cuk od

hal he wol (Lle6 allY beer Lape!

th sink of Ga Pia GS) Fie ta. Of

tice Will wok ke Setved bY Herdoich Shay

inG in Rison Any Lon Wbk by Lhirs Counk

takin’ A feol on bed Lime L hear Lhis CAse

He fiather submrd Ark. he Loill suttea 1 (1

Poicable dem Abe if he RS Mele Lp Con it tor

e dishssition of this CAce.

nnngieti Lis Sion —

wherefore Haroboick fea/ thal this Couet M bve

va)

Ps: Aas! subscarkal beloae

Ee ntlese of Atty ae

Bite And mee the hovtatlle cored Ls moe twos Andre rnd Ceetty tal he Arve submitled the

—_— /

Ceotlicnle of SER Vice

hua

Comes Now Your for hroner » feo- Se 3 Kk. Bobb Y

hens Poiaclanile cuith A Copy 6b this Action by Reson -

ALLY submdldinl the Sime £ Lheie

Abent LE.

Dale Goll , this eZ day of By 199¢

Eu omek Gol veerlY Lint 2 hire vo.

Ceived A Cofy ol the Above Petron fon Reo

S fondenls by aw Br watune AL the botlom ob

Fhic cheumend. This Lina i |

ae 102. Bobby Hencdhvickah 2

Swoerts Te And Subscibe to pee Ne bhkoay Mayor

My CoMmMrsSi on se ! Prees. My Commissidn Ppires FEB 74. 5»

SigwAtuae A woThp’/ lublicf

a Sn DPrend ry

—_-_

= ff if?)

UNiTED STATES DISTRICT CCURT

NORTHERN DiS ?RICT OF GEORGIA

TLANTA DIVISICi

BOBBY HARDWICK

Vs CIVIL ACTION CASE # C 77-1032 A

MRS. MAMIE REESE, Chairwoman and

Members of the State Board of

Pardon and Parole

JUDGMENT

The Court, Honorable

United States District Judge, by order of this date, having

Granted Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim,

JUDGMENT is hereby entered in favor of the

respondent(s) and against ‘the petitioner ¢s}.

Deted at Atlanta, Georgia, this 7,, day of

OCTOBER » 1977

BEN H. CARTER, CLERK

. (‘aval Payor —

: BY’ ___Carol_ Hayman

; DEFUTY CLERK

Filed and entered in

Clerk's Office this

BEN H. CARTER, CLERK

BY’ Carol Hayman

DEPUTY. CLERK

Exhibil— AAA

+ ren oe e-em

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

ATLANTA DIVISION

BOBBY HARDWICK

i C77-1032A

MRS. MAMIE REESE, Chairwoman,

and MEMBERS OF THE STATE BOARD

OF PARDON AND PAROLE

ORDER OF COURT

Bobby Hardwick, a state prisoner presently incarcerated in

the Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center at Jackson,

Georgia, brings this action for violation of his civil rights

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is presently before the Court

on defendants’ motion to dismiss or in the alternative for summary

judgment.

The complaint alleges the denial of constitutionally protected

due process by action of the defendants in denying him parole.

Petitioner alleges that he was denied due process because the

Board (1) did not give him a parole determination hearing; (2)

considewved the nature of his offense in their decision denying

him parole; (3) refused to permit him to look at his file main-

tained by the Board; (4) refused to consider all of the relevant

factors; (5) was racially prejudiced; and (6) used juvenile

records.

The Court finds that even if the facts as presented by

plaintiff are true, his complaint fails to state a claim upon

which relief can be granted because due process rights do not

As the Fifth Circuit has

attach to parole release proceedings.

stated in ‘Brown v. Lundegren, 528 F.2d 1050 (5th Cir. 1976):

In any context where it is asserted that con-

stitutional due process is required, the basic

threshold question is whether there is a ‘grie-

vous loss" of either a liberty or property in-

terest. If there is no such loss, then the second

‘ question of whether the particular challenged

procedure comports with fundamental fairness

is never reached. In short, we find that the

Bnm tant aml mawntn 2 Ai atinaniah«jA feam +hoa reaun—

- itd ‘Il CLERK'S OFFI

~ J

and we therefore do not consid

er whether the pro-

cedures of the parole board den i i

cons

> encod y nstitutional

528 F.2d 1053.

In order to show such a "grevious loss” plaintiff has the

burden to show that he would have been released except for the

faulty parole proceeding. The subjective expectation of parole

or the belief that he would have had a "better chance" for parole

are not so vested as to result in a “arievous loss" if denied

by the parole board.

Accordingly, defendants' motion to dismiss fcr failure to

State a claim is hereby GRANTED.

SO ORDERED, this Z day of October, 1977.

5 SSE le Pa Le

* UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ee ee

A jf if 7© ARV

~w/

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

DO Kai

PUBLISH

NO. 77-3262

Summary Calendar*

DR. BOBBY HARDWICK,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MRS. MAMIE REESE, Chairwoman,

ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Georgia

( May 3, 1978 )

BEFORE BROWN, Chief Judge, COLEMAN and VANCE, Circuit Judges

See Local Rule 21.

PER CURIAM: AFFIRMED.

*Rule 18, 5 Cir., see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citiz:ns Casualty

Co. of New York, et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409

see N.L.R.B. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir.

1970, 430 F.2d 966

7 Y/

United States Court of Appeals

FIFTH CIRCUIT

TEL S04~-569.6514

600 CAMP STREET

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

NEW ORLEANS. LA 70130

May 3, 1978

EDWARD W. WADSWORTH

cCire«

MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL OR PARTIES LISTED BELOW:

No.77-3262 - HARDWICK VS, REESE ET AL,

Dear Counsel:

Enclosed is a copy of the Court's Rule 21 Decision this day rendered in

the above case which has been entered as the judgment required by rule 36

of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure,

Rules 39, 40 and 41, F.R.A.P., govern costs, petitions for rehearing and

mandates, respectively. A petition for rehearing must be filed in the

Clerk's Office within 14 days from S date, acing the petition in

e ma on e ay w not su ce,

Local Rule 15 provides that "A motion for a stay of the issuance of a

mandate in a direct criminal appeal filed under F.R.A.P. Rule 41 shall

not be granted simply upon request. Unless the petition sets forth good

cause for stay or clearly demonstrates that a substantial question is to

be presented to the Supreme Court, the motion shall be denied and the

mandate thereafter issued forthwith,"

If you are court-appointed counsel, your attention is called to Local

Rule 7 which provivies: "Appointed counsel shall, in the event of

affirmance or other decision adverse to the party represented, promptly

advise him in writing of his right to seek further review by the filing

of a petition for writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court, and shall

file such petition, if requested by such party in writing to do so."

Very truly yours,

EDWARD W. WADSWORTH, Clerk

<a CON

enc, puty er

cc: Mr. Bobby Hardwick

Messrs. John ¥. Dunsmore, Jr.

John C, Walden

VY YY

FIFTH CIRCUIT STATEMENT ON PETITIONS

FOR REHEARING OR REHEARING EN BANC

NECESSITY FOR FILING

It is not necessary to file a petition for rehearing in the

Court of Appeals as a prerequisite to the filing of a petition for

certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States.

PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING

A petition for rehearing is intended to bring to the attention

of the panel claimed errors of fact or law in the opinion. It is not

> to be used for reargument of the issue previously presented or to

" “ “attack the court's well settled summary calendar procedures.

for rehearing are reviewed by panel members only. Four copies of all

petitions for rehearing shall be filed.

EXTRAORDINARY NATURE OF PETITIONS

FOR REHEARING EN BANC

A petition for rehearing en banc is an extraordinary procedure

which is intended to bring to the attention of the entire court ee

precedent-setting error of exceptional public importance or an opinion

which directly conflicts with prior Supreme Court or Fifth Circuit

precedent. Alleged errors in the determination of state law, or in the

facts of the case (including sufficiency of the evidence), or error

asserted in the misapplication of correct precedent to the facts of the

case, are matters for panel rehearing but not for rehearing en banc.

THE MOST ABUSED PREROGATIVE

Petitions for rehearing en banc are the most abused prerogative

of appellate advocates in the Fifth Circuit. While such petitions were

filed in 15% of the cases decided by this circuit last year, less than

1% of the cases decided by the court are reheard en banc; and most of

the rehearings granted resulted from a request for en banc reconsidera-

tion by a judge of the court initiated independent of any petition.

PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Twenty-five eee of arent peettton Segeees tg rears en banc

shall be filed. The tition shall co! a 1

no case refer to or adopt by reference any matter from other briefs or

— motions in the case. The form and contents of the petition are set out

in Local Rule 12(b).

Under Fifth Circuit Local Rule 12, counsel are required to file

a written statement setting forth why, in their studied profess)onal

judgment, the case should be reheard en banc, listing either the Fifth

Circuit or Supreme Court cases with which the decision conflicts or the

questions of exceptional importance which would require en banc considera-

tion. Therefore, unless these rigid standards of Federal Rule of

Appellate Procedure 35 are met, the duty of counsel is fully discharged

without the filing of such a petition.

RESPONSE TO PETITIONS

No response to a petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc

should be filed unless requested by the court.

TIME AND FORM--EXTENSIONS

The petition (panel or en banc) must be filed within 14 days

after the date of the opinion. Counsel should not request extensions

of time except for the most compelling reasong. Printing delays will

not be considered a sufficient reason, as clear and legible reproduced

copies of typewritten petitions are authorized in the form prescribed

by Rule 40(b) F.R.A.P.

ANE mete +

RULE 12. EN BANC

Ww VA

(a) Procedure. A Suggestion for a hearing or rehearing en banc may

be made as provided in F.R.A.P. 35 and herein or by any judge of the

court in active service on his own motion.

The court en banc shall consist of all circuit judges in regular

active service of the circuit. A circuit judge of the circuit who

has retired from regular active service shall also be competent to

sit as a judge of the court en banc in the rehearing of a case or con-

troversy if that judge sat on the panel at the original hearing thereof.

See also Fed. R. App. P. 35, 28 U.S.C. $46(c), and Allen v. Johnson,

391 F.2d 527 (Sth Cir. aJeays. tf rehearing en banc is granted, every

Party shall furnish to the clerk 15 additional copies of every brief

the party has previously filed.

(b) Form of Suggestion. Twenty-five copies of every petition suggesting

rehearing en banc shall be filed. The petition shall be complete in it-

self and shall in no case refer to or adopt by reference any matter from

other briefs or motions in the case. It shall contain the following

items, in order:

(1) The certificate of interested persons required for briefs

by Local Rule 13(£)(1);

(2) Where the petitioner for rehearing en banc is represented

by counsel, one or both of the following statements of counsel

is applicable:

I express a belief, based on a reasoned and studied

professional judgment, that the panel decision is con-

trary to the following decision(s) of the United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit {or the Supreme

Court of the United States], and that consideration by

the full court is necessary to secure and maintain uni-

formity of decisions in this court: [citing specifically

the case or cases]

I express a belief, based on a reasoned and studied

professional judgment, that this appeal involves one or

more questions of exceptional importance: [set forth

each question in one sentence]

Attorney of record for

Counsel are reminded that in every case the duty of counsel is

fully discharged without filing a suggestion for rehearing en banc

unless the case meets the rigid standards of F.R.A.P. 35(a).

(3) Table of contents and citations;

(4) A statement of the issue Or issues asserted to merit en banc

consideration. It will rarely occur that these will be the same

as those appropriate for panel rehearing. A petition for rehear-

ing en banc is an extraordinary procedure which is intended to

bring to the attention of the entire court a precedent-setting

error of exceptional public importance or an opinion which directly

conflicts with prior Supreme Court or Fifth Circuit precedent.

Alleged errors in the determination of state law, cr in the facts

of the case (including sufficiency of the evidence), or error

asserted in the misapplication of correct precedent to the facts

of the case, are matters for panel rehearing but not for rehearing

ea banc;

(5) A statement of the course of Proceedings and disposition of

the case;

(6) A statement of any facts necessary to the argument oi the issues;

(7) Argument and authorities. These shall concern only the issues

required by paragraph (4) hereof and shall address specifically,

mot only their merit, but why they are contended to be worthy of

en banc consideration:

7 we ew - we

—_—_

a : J. O. Partain, Jr.

Chawman Member

Joseph G. Maddox

Member

ROOM 610 :

800 PEACHTREE STREET Mrs. Mamie B. Reese

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30208 Member

James T. Morris

Member

February 11, 1976

Ars. Jill Elliott

Attorney at Law

Blanton & Fudge

2200 Century Parkway

Atlanta N.E.,

Georgia 30345

Dear Mrs. Elliott:

As you requested, I have reviewed Bobby Hardwick's case

in order to respond to your questions regarding his status

and the possibility of any consideration for release at

this time.

Our records show that Mr. Hardwick was sentenced in Richmond

County, Georgia on January 8, 1970 to serve life and ten

years consecutive for Armed Robbery and Aggravated Assault.

“In I973 he receiyed two more life sentences bs

ng ; Ty: wces for aggravated assault, all

OL utd to each other and consecutive to the previous

sentences. Even with these con D e sentences, Mr.

Qre ~Hardwick must be reviewed for parole (according to Georgia

aS law) after serving seven years in confinement.

wet His first life sentence was computed from December 30, 1969;

therefore, he is to be considered for parole during December

1976. Since he is serving a life sentence, Mr. Hardwick does

not earn good time credit, and he does not have a discharge

date. If he is ever released, it must be granted by this

Board (or Court action).

A review of the facts surrounding Mr. Hardwick's case did not

indicate that any basis for exceptional consideration exists.

fhe Board does not alter the parole eligibility date, which

is set by law, except under very unusuel circumstances when

the Board is convinced that a serious miscarriage of justice

has occurred. There is no indication that this occurred in

Mr. Hardwick's case.

Cont/d. ee

_—

See eee =

. “yy rere

Cont/d...

Ars. Jill Elliott '

Attorney at Law

Blanton & Fudge

2200 Century Parkway

Atlanta, N.E.,

Georgia 30345

al .

Ir. ‘Hard ck a

’

mature of his current off

enses, and hi

are among the factors that will be janndae ee see

Lar

+ Robertson Haworth

Executive Officer

Sincerely,

JRE :ehp

—o_ see

— — einen eRAEReeEEE ie

— >: patton Deeeemnemena

" - “eae ras, “a +t Dates ob eel iether. Xe tel nevne e's “4 ‘hee ~ a, WS

Cont/d. ee

Mrs. Jill Elliott ' :

Attorney at Law

Blanton & Fudge Ceci C. McCall

2200 Century Parkway Chairmen

Atlanta, N.E.,

Georgia 30345

J. O. Partain, Jr.

Member

Mrs. Mamie B. Reese

* Member

ROOM 610 .

; ; James T. Morris

The Parole Board is required by law, to consider Mr. Hardwick | Png henge Lyd ++ Ache

for parole in December 1976. It is not necessary that he apply eed 11, 1976 :

for this consideration or than anyone else apply in his behalf. ! Fic dE. Bust

’ —

When the Board reviews Mr. ‘Hardwick's case, all information : fe S 6

available will be considered. #is prior criminal record, the ; 7*?. 7 le NLA.

mature of his current offenses, and his record during incarceration pl

are among the factors that will be considered. ° Mr. Bobby Hardwick, D-2210

H-3-44.

Georgia Diagnostic and

’ Classification Center

Sincerely, Post Office Box 3877

Jackson, Georgia 30233

} for Dear Mr. Hardwick:

. Robertson Haworth .

I received your letter regarding your sentences. When I re-

Executive Officer

checked your record, I found that you are correct in that

) the original convictions were overturned and you were later

i resentenced on the same cases. Our records do show that you

‘ are serving for only two cases of aggravated assault and two

cases of armed robbery as you stated in your letter.

JRE: ehp

_—-

Sincerely,

f= gi

obertson HaWorth

~ Lxecutive Officer

ee oe

—"

JRH:dsm

tae Evhibé - 6

ee ee me *

, a

flLawwtd

arate) ay. ee Mernheus

eAiwwl beluc fe

uv ’ To LAdi b.

4 The United slates Cour ot at lerLs

| 40) Civeuid — a

Me. Bubby tlavclincl we BD 22 2

. Riise Cre numbe. 12-3 Ll 2

lun te

is ip, MNane Reese - Cha. - Wor

<2 Ga. Fae ale Bonk ds .

Res Fanadl Pre bi.

nck «tw ~ Miss

We Lhe, be Low Sibmed , Atlee vss

Ave = CAteol blane

Add .dnud ah Mes. Od -

Ossie . fad wo Glew - the

Leunwa

Linus ht:

ALLY #r-

AGent Aulho.zZal lL Ad M113 12T~

i Thal uc fle Cibs zens of

ile. ol AiwiccA fyrl of

_—_—_—

Bec. ( Ll Rat Ratu sla,

—

w Ube oalh , de fore , And Swen hb lhe

lhe slntfe of

Geuwb, A.

: 3

~~ ee I

Aodlor

Le Linked S7.

(6 vi. fra

Lhe MADve stumbl ub blow lw Plawblt LuAyY

Thal ue, AS Members of Oy. Bobb BIN dou les

Wrred.ale Jan ls Aemed heduce lhe Kes?Paclesls

Div Jeb, 2. 117¢ ds feisowalLlV AC Feil i Ke: P-

nideiuks -L, Allow Tinh ll Le he Kk-Leiveel —

ele pi bal. he ReCEwe A Reducton wl hs

iz : > eg Al louse bis evle. Aw

ePaper ae Ceiott..——

As ust Cause foe Lhe aise Ke tw

pi. a ere Numexkous bther—el—kazomme: lad, uss fIS

[Ae 7a fl. A Fel, oe Sil nrGel b / ovée one hiurocke.

a. Li zeus AuGus ay ( wheveuw, dha Ake d

low Ue ReLense ot PLA. ity / { Ov F, Mole.

Sv sl of oue AiKAY rt evelence j bis

Shaw how Plawt+H have been Kehabil, Loled, Lhe

Kool, bisd Cubs stalec! » Wm Wo UneedtAin Le«ms F ‘Lh, it

Lhat have CAused him Lo Miss Prv le, Ftc LAit

rub Pesbably Cause hin ES peubiace Lo MisS sie

Pru dc , is his Conbnsied Filind " cuk b's iw Cy.

Heke r Aid , heii Jeebul Lhal Maiwkdt iS

Low smAct Se Ink As lYnnwlecl 6e .

te ee ee ee ee ny ‘e ‘

Mu. S. v. Vn. Law viasho is Also A Membe, ron) 4

Je wd bop, urit so Ink As -L sony LArté

, the (re de Boned Luere ‘ie Relense Thain Ade Mel

a Gul F) Tob he, CLaiwtel tovule be tellin Aw

ak ten le ee De in, A mauler of wane

—.

Thil rd Ve hive led Res Pissidbiscdls Cv ASS -

= Lh Flewdst had Not been Kehiabil, dbrleel —

at he F if LL “SE d, Loolel be A Liven ty Sie

ely Ther. irc tid, wal Obse ss: on tWAs Otv AL Av sk, [+

Lint Lok, L. And Lhe Lnaatht Lhal Elaivell Luns

1 Me Kroow cf nll.

Th: lin mor 1978

re aa Ye pe Bs

YareNY, For: cK

ree AAAI /

x 2000 NM ty ik

A bebe de /

Here CUOle

| Dele Ly wel subse, bed er Mp pe libel iy ne

4 CoMM Sign ealive ee expics Nox. 13,388

Aluwe Ol Wolaay- ens ae

ar |

7 7 weer we we we eee

OUR 15S2ND YEAK—NO. 37

MACON, GEUKUIA, MUNVAT MURINIIWU, § CE ene 6 uy cere

* Holl-Hole’ Ruling: Prison Reform To Follow?

By SHERRY HOWARD

Tetegrash Staff Writer

Bohby Hardwick dubbed the H-

House a “hell hole.”

Loon urnving at the disciplinary

wing at the Georgia Diagnostic and

Classification Center im Jackson,

Hardwick came face to face with

“what he later described as “the most

cruel and unusual extreme maximum

ywcunty ever conceived by any

giate

thoaates were shipd to the H-

1, without a hearing, Hardwick

said. Some of their mail was opened.

Their books and magazines were cen-

sored. They were subjected to strip

searches and were kept at bay with

stun guns.

H-House was cruel and unusual

punishment, Hardwick wrote a feder-

al judge in Macon. Hardwick ts serv-

ing time for armed robbery.

U.S. District Judge Wilbur D.

Owens Jr subsequently agreed. More

than three years after Hardwick filed

a $10 million suit against the state,

Owens recently issued @ decision that

could reach far beyond the prison sys

tem in Georgia. ,

“This is first decision in the

country that says this kind of behav-

tor modification program 1s unconstt-

tutional,” said Thomas West, an At-

lanta attomey who argued the Jack-

son case for the American Civil Lib

erties Union.

“The H House is no longer a dump

ing ground for people the system

doesn't like,” West said. The ruling

sets up a “kind of due process proce-

dure.”

THAT DUE PROCESS procedure

translates into a hearing to which all

prisoners are entitied before they're

sent to the diagnostic center, a 1,-

1%}man maximum security prison

about 40 miles north of Macon

The Jackson prison pnmarily fun-

nels inmates to other penal institu-

tions in Georgia.

The H-House 1s the state's prison

inside a pnson. Here inmates from

throughout Georgia, but mostly from

the state prison in Reidsville, are sent

48 punishment for viol.ting pmson

judge's order. They directed inquines

to the state law office.

OWENS ORDERED that prisoners

not be locked away in H-House with-

out a hearing, in contradiction to a

U.S. Supreme Court ruling that prison

officials don't have to give a reason

for transferring prisoners between

prisons, West noted.

The judge ruled that “H-House just

isn’t another prison. The courts look

at exactly what they are doing with

them in H-House.”

What the state was doing, Hard-

wick and other Jackson inmates said

in suits filed in federal court, was

placing them into the H-House for in-

definite periods. In most cases prison

— decided if they should be re-

“You cannot put someone in prison

under complete control of prison offi-

cials without doing damage to the

prisoner and prison officials,” said

Robert Goldberg, an Atlanta attorney

who assisted West.

“The damage to the prisoner is

that his life is controlled by someone

else. You can't give that much power

to anybody.”

Goldberg noted that even prison

ounselors testified that ¢ were

Owens said prisoners were not told

how they could be released from the

disciplinary wing and some stayed

there for years. recommended

for transfer were sometimes rejected

by wardens in the state who would

not accept them imto their prisons.

The prisoners in H-House com-

plained about the catwalk (@ square

porthole covered with metal grates

used by officials to watch and com-

municate with inmates), tight secur-

ity and the use of stun guns, hand-

Officials used stun aimed at

inmates’ heads, to e them into

performing some small task, Hard-

wick wrote to the judge.

OWENS ORDERED the state to

close the catwalk, increase the per

ods of exercise for prisoners and limit

the use of debilitating devices.

“Jackson was a subtle kind of

cruelty,” Goldberg said. “Reidsville

is a lot more openly racist and a lot

more brutal im a real cruel sort of

way.

“We didn't show many beatings (at

the Jackson center). They put people

into cells and (left) them there.”

Dr. Richard Kom, &@ penoiogigt

from New Jersey, whose testimony

Owens quoted several times in his or-

der, warned Georgia prison officials

against such segregation units as the

_ cuffs and strip searches.

rules and for disciplinary reasons

The H- House, Owens said, ap

proached solitary confinement

Operation of the disciplinary wing,

the federal judcee wrote, wis in vie’.

tion of the inv COM it ter th

rights He orders: .e State Tle

ment of Offender Fehahil atiwn to

correct the probe i5 and submit a

plan to fed al court within W days.

The state.’ tment dened che in-

mates’ char: - “hroughout the case.

The state nevvrst ina brief filed in fed-

eral court thal the “segregation unit™

ad ~~

“The H-House.” he testified, “was

slowly making people psychologically

Gehumanized and essentially de

stroyed.”

Korn talked to at least six H-House

inmates

He also testified that he found a

rare talent in Hardwick, whom Gold-

berg noted had “saved himself” by

becoming a lawyer for the other. pns-

oners.

Hardwick, diagnosed as delusional.

schizophrenic and paranoid, spends a

large part of his time im his H-House

cell wnting wmts, Goldberg said.

A 7-foot high pile of law documents

crowd the cell, West noted.

Hardwick has on occasion, asked to

remain in the disciplinary wing

“He built his world im the H-

House,” West observed.

OWENS ALSO ordered the siate to

refram from censoring inmates’ out-

going non-privileged mail just be

Cause someone personally objected to

what “as contained in it.

Prison officials must no longer cen-

sor books and magazines personally

offensive or thflammatory to them,

the judge ruled.

Visitation privileges for inmates,

Owens said, must be advantageous to

prisoners and not officials. The judge

also ordered that law hbranes be es-

hehe

was used “ne to rehabilitate but to

take away from the general pepula-

tion dangerous, assaultive irmates.”

A spokesman for the state's law de

cuerteviert sot Mee pide sf? BUS

oder a toe He sanf the

State Wie mPa pas have ;

an apprus Serrin wf :

The com: wvet of es ~

partment of Corie et vo. i ve

ans, and Preivet Oe ie

MOSIIC Cenier wont | a

(See Judge, Page SA)

—

Judge Lowers Boom On State ‘Hiell-Hole’

fie Le Ge = = i

Ea- be 2.3% =x pet) 3

eee 28553 Eg ®

=ok Sessa es = f

asf: gttiod te em

sxe eS 8: mS 2

lig leit & =

ae3 Ss. ooo ge < eed

and |S &

"Ee Ba g8 : “

te tag | So ||

50% Sec z ~. et | :

mese2o BS a é

GILG = |i

ii HE & op

a eiiee ets a >

gPgied? Pee ko

2 e4ZEs of ; = =

g eas. sae _

7ieptni Ss *

A lit Feb EO

«5 f+ + fa }

82 4 wa” mal a: spital

- mts lamilar with the bn Po Bes, fon CW. Jones a wn

: Contineed trom Page 1-¢ —Prison— eile

That means all '

& bearing before oon are entitled to

* Genter, a 1,100-man mace”, M diagnostic Judge Owens noted that ~

about 40 maximum not told how Prisoners were 7

0 mes north of Macon." PPSOR—dlsciplinary wing and ‘sre’ used (0m the 1

mates to ane Prison primarily funnels jy. OAs. Those recommended for iranin’ taor

meme” Roi ea ees

meats om Gute George Set yg ted sen ft Sind at

Ar Bat 8 panshmen or mse re, ll ak Hn etm rier soe

tie fcoinry neat Me™ Ones weet arene ee

play concen Said, approached periods of exercise for prisoners and nt ne 4

federal judge wen’ gs*iPlinary wing. the Dr. Richard Korn a 3

lamates’ cons rote, was in violation of the from New Jersey an expert penalogist

ed coestitutvonat rights. several times in ney Owens

state noted in a brief mat charges. tion units oficial againat sack "

the “segregation ume” 1s eral “The H-Hew tome. eo

“Bot to rehabilitate but unit” was used H-House,” he testified,

at be to tte away fet MUMOE people poyencnpc gc mtr

A spokesman for the state's law from abe the state to refrain ot.

se nae tee tne cn a gt

‘ art

Sane ue state wil aaa = Prises phony oe = te

~~ dt = aoe days. 7 peed Maganines personaily offensive : Hi

t Band, .. Lepart- Ory to them, the et

Heal a te dase fea 24 al mt ge PERS fo anaes, Oweny

Bale law olfices. in libraries be eatabiokeg 20 éered that law yy

Prisons, several Georgia

irs. — B. Reese on) Partai

irman fia : ~ 4 /

iss /e2 Cecit C. McCall

E Member

scoreteenecerncer — JH po ae |

a+ __ ATLANTA, GEORGIA 20208 Z Jommes_ T. Mort

lous. ’

7 January hs) 1977 ast

Mr. Bobby Hardwick D<“2210

dunes

Pei tO on! a

—

% WARDEN

Georgia Diagnostic & Classificaton Center

Jackson, Georgia

Dear Mr. Hardwick:

Recently your case was thoroughly reviewed for parole on its merit

in accordance with Georgia law, and you were not among those granted

has been set for reconsideration in

parole at this time. Your case

Factors which contributed in the Board's decision

December of 1977.

are your_circumstance and nature of offense) previous arrest record;

present attitude, ineffective use of time; §na institutional disci-

plinary record. ,

Your record indicates you have made little effort to improve yourself.

We realize your institution may not have all the programs to help

you with your particular needs and it is recommended you consult your

counselor or other correctional staff for help in planning a program

for self improvement. It is our feeling you need to participate in

institutional attitude change to helping yourself become a responsible

person, counseing, development of personal goals which will lead

to a mature life style, educational training, and job training. The

Board feels such participation may accelerate your rehabilitation.

on is important to you and we regret

We commend your efforts

The Board realizes this decisi

jon and hope favorable

more favorable action could not be taken.

in constructive use of leisure time and recreat

action can be taken in the future.

Sincerely,

M. KR.

Administrativ

MPM/bf

ce ‘warden

Correctional Counselor

Parole Supervisor

File

—$_

5.0. Partain, Jr.

een ea ee 2 Oe

ogee

—— ~~ ne ee ee ge eT

el le tn et tg. A

bee bale etre et

PERSONAL LEGAL COMMUNICATION

State Board of Pardons and Paroles Law Offices of sapaees

E> :

James T. Morris ‘ rR erry Grace Wilkey Thomas

Chairman 7 7 Member | woe GEORGIA FEDERAL SAVINGS BUILDING

‘ % BR i. 20 MARIETTA STREET NW

OOM 610 | os

y) #00 PEACHTREE STREET Mobley Howell | > 4 GRACE WILKEY THOMAS. ATTORNEY Feb. 21. 1978 ATLANTA GEORGIA 30303

, ATLANTA. GEORGIA 30308 Member | = ? >

Mrs. Mamie B. Reese Dr. Bobby Hardwick #D2210

December 14, 1977 Member Georgia Diagnostic & Classification Center

, P. O. Box 3877 #B-75

Floyd E. Busbee Jackson, Georgia 30233

Member Re: Parole Board Hearing

Dear Dr. Hardwick:

Mr. Bobby Hardwick D=-2210

% WARDEN

Georgia Diagnostic & Classification Center

Jackson, Georgia

You will be glad to know that we did have the hearing before the

Parole Board today. Appearing in your behalf, in addition to

your attorney, were your mother, your wife, daughter and sister.

Dear Mr. Hardwick: All of them spoke eleoquently in your behalf as did your attorney.

It was a FULL BOARD HEARING. We introduced various documents in

your behalf, including a letter to the Board from Dr. Yost and

a letter from your representative there at the Diagnostic Center.

Your friend, Rev. S. T. Willingham was supposed to have appeared

at the hearing, however, he did not make it. He called this

afternoon after I had returned to my office. He said that he was

going over to the Board and talk with the Board inasmuch as Tues-

day is regular meeting day. One can not have a full hearing

without arranging it in advance.

Recently your case was thoroughly reviewed for parole on its merit

in accordance with Georgia law, and you were not among those granted

parole at this time. Your case has been set for reconsideration in

December of 1978. Factors which contributed in the Board's decision

are your circumstance and nature of offense, pattern of criminal

behavior, and institutional disciplinary record.

I certainly wish that someone

QYldagpd would pay me for all the work I am having to do on

w @ special ellort to obey ALL rules such as not having

Your record indicates you have made little effort to improve yourself.

We realize your institution may not have all the programs to help

you with your particular needs and it is recommended you consult your

our possession, as a prisoner has ver

and you just hove to knuckle down and be meek and mild

—

counselor or other ree da yn oe help = oe gerne seg tony & z

pel any Mage te <n ge personal spake cheek will Seed to a mature . ea gory ae a an e yo educated man, even if a lot of it

life style, and institutional attitude change to helping yourself 23% y self-education. On the other hand, many of those who have to dis-

become a responsible person. The Board feels such participation may 32. 3 cipline you are not as well-educated as you are and this my ‘account

accelerate your rehabilitation. 3S. 8 for some of the lack of peace and understanding between you and

296. some of the men (guards, etc.) who discipline you. Somehow, you

The Board realizes this decision is important to ated pon we ——. +, 2% manage to get a lot of disciplinary reports. Mr. Partain evinced

more favorable action could not be taken. We comme et mag ts 108 an opinion on this that perhaps you felt a little superior to some

in educational training and hope favorable action can . > 325 a of the men who discipline you and who are your superiors down

the future. S23 there. You have a degree in psychology and I would suggest that

sincerely, ,uus bend is the time to put it to good use. Regardless of whether you

like any of your superiors, just make a special effort to find

FOR 3 ~ something good in each of them and make it a point to get along

with them, nor matter how hard it is. Now is the time to evince

ower HUMILTY and don't be a "know it all" as these men probably already

. r ‘ resent you %efore you are smarter than some of them. This was

M. G. Thompson, Supervisor discussed at the Board Hearing. Dr. Partain seemed to feel that

Disposition Unit this would be very difficult for you because you are naturally a

person with a lot of ability. However, it was brought out that you

MGT/bf ad were convicted of having a yun in this armed robbery aid the

ce Warden citizens of Augusta have been trying to get legislation passed to

- Correctional Counselor prevent paroles altogether in such cases. Although, they ayreed

Parole Supervisor that you_have every right to kecp filing writs, they eyjneed dis-

File leasure with the face that you continue to file writs. They are

oa PS ae Sa eee ech ey ; eee ; BAERS j BE 1S*SEL VP HG ak TKATEMEBE: yotour wife told chem that your

yaaa Ayunoes

aiam sourresew

stm jew sep

Vseunde

29H Il?H>

aaah

ET comer at wena «

—

IIA peoidsap

smI0joy UOStd

vey [sr es V9

———

PRE.Y*_E2S_Ep 2uw>

;

[

Hl fi

“< EE

- Parole Board Basics

STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES

«A

800 Peachtree Street, NE., Room 610, Atlanta, Georgia 30308, Telephone: (404) 894-5360

Fundamentals

The State Board of Pardons and Paroles is

composed of five members appointed by the

Governor for seven-year terms subject to confirma

tion by the State Senate. Fach year the Board

elects one of its members to erve as chairman,

The Board was established in 1943 by an

amendment to the Georgia Constitution and

functions as part of the Executive Branch of State

government. The Board is attached. for the pur

pose of recetving administrative support, to the

Department of Offender Rehabilitation but per-

| foams its duties independently of that Department.

Rule-Making Authority

The Board may at any time adopt rules not in

consustent with the law.

Representation by Attorneys

Representation by an attorney is not necessary

for any type of clemency consideration. Considers

tion for several types of clemency is automaty,

and application for the other types ts casy. Board

procedures are not too formal or comple. for the

average person to understand. The deciion

| whether to employ an attomey & 2 personal

decision by the offender, ¢x-offender. of anyone

acting in his behalf.

Only lxensed attorneys who are active

members, in good standing, of the State Bar of

Georgia may appear before the Board for a fee,

| The Board may require any attorney representing a

| person before the Board to file a sworn statement

a to whether he t recerving a fee.

A member of the Georgia General Assembly or

| other elected of appointed State official may not

charge a fee for appearing before the Board

regardless of whether he ts an attorney.

Written Communication Preferred

The Board greatly prefers receiving written

| communication on a cave rather than oral com

|munkation wo that sah communkation may

teadily be made a permanent past of the caw file,

Confidentiality of Records

All information, both oral and written, recened

by the Board in the periormame of ity duty and

whah no not publa record chewherc and was not

obtamed in a pullx Board bearing yc laiticd a

contwicatial State secret unlew declawitwd by

frewution of the Board. ( ontidential miormation

ma tudes tnwestigetiwe and superiors reports and

recommendation tor and against chem my).

Majority Vote Decides Clemency

A dxviem to grant any type of chlememy 1 by

majority vole CMC ept tn cme westame. A aranimeus

vote ® Accemary to change @ death wnteme to

any theng other than bic mmprewnment

Acceptance of Conditions in Writing

An vomate 6 tetermed of theo cmmeliteonn of hs

parole, reprieve. of other conditional clomen y and

must acept all conditions by vagning the clemency

daument beta the clememy etl become

othe. te,

Withdrawal of Grant of Clemency

The Board teowrves the apht te wethdieaw the

grant of amy fom of chomoms pre te the offer

tree hate oho tts dix retin, ot believes « ithdrawal

ter he pastelard,

Probation Is Not Parole

Probate «met an atiot the State Bead of

Pardeus and Parodies, Profation 6 an act of a court,

Probation ® not parole, Parke: may be granted by

the Paroke Hoard atten a perenne has setwed part of

be wrtome in preen. Prebatew tevteal of an

Ss hihil

PAROLE ELIGIBILITY SCHEDULE _

FELONY Parot

Sentence Length thigitehty

In Years Time

SOs oi6c a vee ces ete Imo. F''

Mis 64.4 aha.s'e bk ee 10 mo. .*

Daweh & ad mne ee oe I yr. ,

Debs kaha eons eens lyr. 2 mo.

om ss. 0e ene be 6 eee lyr. 4 mo.

Ghccesehacécesaar tyr. 6 mo.

hee re Tee ou eos lyr. Smo.

OS cake 0006 hae eae ee lyr.

T 64 eee ein ais ec 2yr. 4 mo.

Os ivsitae sees mune 2yr. Smo.

WD Awck sat eceeweeae 3yr. 4mo.

Se isk wks bee _3yr. 8 mo.

me sedatdauencun een 4yr.

oe We kn ctu ees s kine 4yr. 4mo.

| eee err eben 4yr. 8 mo.

| PR See a peo S$ yr. :

ae scak’ we .6yr. 8 mo,

iy herr a Tyr

Ss Sree ere eer Tyr

MISDEMEANOR Parole

Sentence | ength Plagibalaty

in Months Time

Sees oo as.sece as 6 mo.

oP -nd wee was se eon & mo. 10 da.

ye rea a er 6 mo, 20 da.

Be wees &% Gk Oe 7 mo.

Oe 6:6. cetk mak’ eee 7? mo, 10 da

ae 6k Wa ws 4h oe eee Se 7 mo. 20 da

24 ‘ou nrmecuyrevlt.weey. 8 mo

ie «ee.b ate bel Waretee 10 mo.

De alee Vik Ws. ene ae 1? mo.

SPP ee rors oe 14 mo.

QD wnedécoveseaeee 16 mo.

_ Tere rey cea 18 mo.

GB a stubeiaesused 20 mo.

The Board « required by Georgia law to

comsaler inmates tor parok according to

thes chgibility whedule, Ehgrbility and con

valeration de net imply that parole will or

will not be granted,

prisonment may be ordered by a court for all or

part of a person's sentence. <

Both a probationer and a paroles are under

supervision and must obcy certain conditions,

. which, if violated, may lead to revexation, The

Parole Board may revoke parole. The wntcncing

court whieh ordered a person placed on probation

i the only agency which may revoke that

probation,

Questions about a person's probated sentencs

-should be directed to the sentencing court.

‘Good Time

The State Board of Pardons and Paroles dées

not administer the system of crediting good tune

to an inmate's sentence for good behavior in

prison, Only the Department of Offender Rehabil

tation may credit, remove, and restore good time

earned in prison,

A person released on parole may continus to

carn good time for good behaswr at the same rate

possible to a prison inmate. The Parole Board »

“authorized to withhold of revoke in ahole of in

part any such good time allowances,

Parole

Parok is the dreretionary rehkaw of an of-

fender from confinement, after he has wrved part

of his sentence, under continue State custody

and wpervnion and under conditions which, if

violated, permit his remmpreonment. In Georngta,

State and county inmates may be eranted parole

only by the State Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Parole Consideration

An inmate serving a State felony of Mots

miademeanor wntence in the custaly of tte

Department of Offender Rehabilitatwn tw auto

matwally consiiered for parole when he meets

tme-wrved requirements, No appln ation its

mv eoemary,

An inmate stving 4 6ounty Mmicmesnor

sentence is considered for parole when he meets

tome served requirements tf he has requested (on-

sale ration,

The Board will consider an mmate tor parole

teeatdles of appeah of other kgal action by the

mmate of his repreentatne othe mmate meets

tune-served requirement. Tt the offender, ame

sooetwing fe. current sentence, bas not at any time

cu okly of the Department of Oftender

. he must request patok comadere

cntomwe

Rehalebhtat:

tne.

A nquest toe park Comedierateen ma be om

amy written borne amd mest (ete mane ander

whah the mmate was comntiod. plac where

et SL ee

va thet, aed hengtoast of womtemetsl Phe nga

showhi be subot tod at least tows meontin beter

the mmate meet time wned equacewnts te

allow cough tame boo neces eesti ations

The Board generally does mot onseter panoling

an ottomber soreing a Goren wertome me cutenty

at an outed State of Dedtenal prec on ata mental

henpital when Lavonathe as thee ot the Heard would

met reolt om the peftemlens tela fron cot

terete ret,

ae.

ee eee

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.