Opposition — Band-Age, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court brief1976
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
——
Su reme Court, U.S.
y TILED
Oct 14 1976
No. 76-275 | cuAgl RODAX, JR, CLERK
ona
In the Supreme Court of the United States
OCTOBER TERM, 1976
BAND-AGE, INC., PETITIONER
Vv.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO
THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FIRST CIRCUIT
MEMORANDUM FOR THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
BOARD IN OPPOSITION
RosBerT H. Bork,
Solicitor General,
Department of Justice, -
Washington, D.C. 20530.
JOHN S. IRVING,
General Counsel,
National Labor Relations Board,
Washington, D.C. 20570.
In the Supreme Court of the Hnited States
OCTOBER TERM, 1976
No. 76-275
BAND-AGE, INC., PETITIONER
Vv.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO
THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FIRST CIRCUIT
MEMORANDUM FOR THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
BOARD IN OPPOSITION
The petition for a writ of certiorari in the instant
case, filed on August 24, 1976, is untimely. The judgment
of the court of appeals in this civil matter (Pet. App. A43—
A-44) was entered on April 13, 1976. The time for filing
a petition for a writ of certiorari was not extended! and,
accordingly, the 90-day period provided in 28 U.S.C. 2101
(c) for petitioning in civil cases expired on July 12, 1976.
‘Petitioner filed an untimely application for an extension of
time (Pet. App. A-57). which was returned by the Clerk of this Court.
(1)
5
The time limit imposed by 28 U.S.C. 2101(c) is juris-
dictional. Toledo Scale Co. v. Computing Scale Co., 261
U.S. 399, 418. Accordingly, the petition should be denied.
Respectfully submitted.
ROBERT H. Bork,
Solicitor General.
JOHN S. IRVING,
General Counsel,
National Labor Relations Board.
OcTOBER 1976.
DOJ-1976-10
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.