Appendix — Garner v. United States
Supreme Court brief1976
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
APPENDIX
ae ee
c
Supreme Court of the United States
October Term, 1974
No. 74-100
ROY D. GARNER,
Petitioner,
vs.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
POR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PETITION FOR CERTIORARI FILED AUGUST 9, 1974
CERTIORARI GRANTED FEBRUARY 18, 1975
IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
October Term, 1974
No. 74-100
ROY D. GARNER,
Petitioner,
VS.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
APPENDIX
a
;
}
‘
b.
y
INDEX TO APPENDIX
Index to Clerk’s Transcript ..................
Notice of Motion and Motions (1) For
. Severance and Separate Trial; (2) For Copy
of Transcript of Grand Jury Proceedings;
(3) Affidavit of Alan Saltzman; (4) Points
and Authorities; (5) To Compel Government
To Disgorge Evidence Favorable to Defend-
ant Re Guilt or Innocence [filed November
i O66 ke Ie seis. . babe ceeetes
Affidavit of Alan Saltzman ..............
Memorandum of Points and Authorities ....
DT 4 e« ctubundbe66 66 s-d6¢ (0066s
Proposed Corrected Indictment
See UNE G, TOTES cecccccccccvcccccces
Application for Order Compelling Testimony
(of Clarence A. “Jack” Swank) - 18 U.S.C.
§ 2514 [filed October 29, 1970] ..............
Affidavit of Robert L. Meyer
(United States Attorney) ................
Order us above dated October 29,1970 ........
26
27
INDEX TO APPENDIX ii.
Page
Judgment and Commitment [filed
November 16,1970) .....-- eee eeeeeees sa 28
Notation re opinion of the Ninth Circuit
Court of Appeals (majority and dissenting)
and the order denying Petition for Rehearing
by that court ......... Tht whale te db ered we 29
Excerpts from Reporter’s Transcript:
R.T. p. 59,1. 3 - p. 67,1. 10
(re & 605 and the use of ee
toll records) ..... wes ee ree ere 30
R.T. p. 248, 1. 24- p. 264, 1. 16
(re Daily Racing Form and its status
as a business record pursuant to
SUVS ae DP cccce: ease eee 36
R.T. p. 420, 1. 18 p p. 423,1.4
(re testimony of Clarence A. “‘Jack”’
i. ree or rer rrr rT 49
R.T. p. 1201, 1. 8- p. 1209, 1. 18
(re introduction of income tax
cccedeceesere’s cane cudde dee 51
R.T. p. 1365,1.9- p. 1366,1. 12
(use of Mr. Garner’s income tax
returns on argument to the jury) .......... 58
Exhibit 19 - Income Tax Returns ..........+-- 60
> eee sews sue ddewee bets 72 -
OO Serer ror rier tre eT 69
9. eee: een rr eee ee 61
INDEX OF CLERK’S TRANSCRIPT
In the United States District Court, Central District of
California.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. ROY D.
GARNER, Defendant.
Case No. 5356 (F) Criminal
Application for Order ered Testimony,
filed 10/29/70 ........... Pe Dee 237
Certified Copy of Indictment, filed 1/22/70 .... 40
Certified Copy of Judgment and Commitment,
filed 11/16/70 ....... reewedé deekeeesed ux 275
Certified Copy of Motion to Dismiss Indictment
(Case No. 4790-Crim.), filed 11/26/69 ........ 2
Certified Copy of Notice of Motion and Motion
for Bill of Particulars (Case No. 2790-Crim.),
filed 11/26/69 ..............
Certified Copy of Notice of Motion and Motion
for Discovery (Case No. 4790-Crim.), filed
Pn i 6cu coud tak eee Sat Se T ey ee 15
Certified Copy of Notice of Motion and
Motions for Severance and for Separate
Trial; for Copy of Transcript of Grand Jury
Proceedings; Affidavit; Points and Authorities:
to Compel Government to Disgorge Evidence
Favorable to Defendant re Guilt or Innocence
(Case No. 4790-Crim.), filed 11/26/69 ........ 32
Certified Copy of Notice of Motion and
Motions for New Trial/Judgment of Acquittal/
An Arrest of Judgment; Points and Authorities
in Support Thereof (Case No. 4790), filed 5/18/70 . 83
Index of Clerk’s Transcript
Certified Copy of Statement of Docket
RE a ee eee
Defendant’s Proposed Instructions (1 through
ee eee rl, Pe dig a bias
Defendant’s Proposed Jury Instructions
a aed | SO Ai Oe ee
Defendant’s Requested Instruction No. 6,
CD? “Le Lode awe ee See PTT
Defendant’s Trial Memorandum Re
Admissibility of Telephone Company
ee ec e es eseues
Designation and Appearance Counsel,
Pe. t66 tee ees bebe sade ees eee
Designation of Record on Appeal,
te cecet deeeckau és bbe tesdhes é
Exhibit to Points and Authorities in Support
of Motion for New Trial, filed 5/28/70
Exhibit to Supplementary Memorandum of
Points and Authorities in Opposition to Motion
for New Trial, filed 6/12/70 ................
... Instructions - filed 11/5/70 ..............
Government’s Requested Special Instructions,
jj neceens une uee needs s ae ewes
Memorandum of Law, filed 2/17/70 ..........
Minute Order (Case No. 4790-Crim.),
cert cea be ene due cweba deb ee
Minute Order (Case No. 4790-Crim.),
ee
247
74
79
190
82
277
125
Index of Clerk’s Transcript
Minute Order, dated 5/28/70 ..............4..
Minute Order, dated 6/12/70 ................
Minute Order, dated 6/22/70 ...... ieipecnee
Minute Order, dated 8/5/70 5... eee ee eee
Minute Order, dated 8/17/70 .............4...
Minute Order, dated 10/5/70 ................
Minute Order, dated 10/27/70 ..............
Minute Order, dated 10/28/70 ..............
Minute Order, dated 10/29/70 =... .. 2... eee
Minute Order, dated 11/2/70 ................
Minute Order, dated 11/3/70 ................
Minute Order, dated 11/4/70 ................
Minute Order, dated 11/5/70 ................
Minute Order, dated 11/6/70 ................
Minute Order, dated 11/16/70 ..............
Motion for Bail for Witness, filed 7/24/70 ......
Notice of Appeal, filed 11/16/70 ............
Noti¢e of Motion and Motion to Quash
ee ED eae ce eeus- eb eeaes
Opposition to Defendant’s Motions for New
Trial, Judgment of Acquittal, and Arrest of
PE eT svessedscceesss wees
109
Index of Clerk’s Transcript
Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Suppress
Evidence, etc., filed 10/21/70 ................
Points and Authorities in Support of Defendant’s
Objections to Introduction of Defendant’s Past
Income Tax Returns, filed 2/17/70 ... .....
Points and Authorities in Support of Motion for
New Trial and Judgment of Acquittal, filed
PETE Kec bneercbnceeeceveetnesevaesees
Proposed Corrected Indictment, filed 8/4/70
Requested Voir Dire Questions and Motion
(contained in question No. 29), filed 2/3/70
Second Supplementary Exhibits and Points
and Authorities in Support of Motion for New
WEP GEEETE cece secccecscasebcuneses
Supplementary Memorandum of Points and
Authorities in Opposition to Motion for New
. Serer re keebveusees
Supplementary Memorandum of Points and
Authorities in Support of Motion for New
DC 8 cisceierveeesceees ea
lO errr rere Terrerrer
eee eked
199
67
267
178
55
163
147
129
266
Original and 2 copies of Reporter’s Transcript of Proceedings
had on October 27, 28, 29, 1970 (volumes 1, 2 and 3); Novem-
ber 2, 3, 4, 5, (volumes 4, 5, 6 and 7); November 6 and 16,
1970 (volume 8)
Certificate By The Clerk
1, Emory G. Hatcher, Clerk of the above entitled Court, hereby
certify the documents listed herein, together with the other
listed items, constitute the record on appeal to the United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in the above entitled case.
Dated and Signed: February 9, 1971.
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTIONS 5.
(1) FOR SEVERANCE AND SEPARATE
TRIAL; (2) FOR COPY OF TRANSCRIPT
OF GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS; (3)
AFFIDAVIT OF ALAN SALTZMAN; (4)
POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; (5) TO
COMPEL GOVERNMENT TO DISGORGE
EVIDENCE: FAVORABLE TO DEFENDANT
RE GUILT OR INNOCENCE
In the United States District Court, Central District of
California.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiffs, vs.
CLARENCE A. SWANK; ROY D. GARNER, et al., Defend-
ants.
Criminal No. 4790(F).
{FILED NOVEMBER 26, 1969]
TO THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on December 18, 1969,
at 10:00 o’clock A.M., as previously orally noticed in Court,
before the HONORABLE WARREN J. FERGUSON, the
Defendant, ROY D. GARNER, will, through counsel, move
the Court for orders as follows:
(1) Directing a severance and separate trial as to the
Defendant, ROY D. GARNER, from the other Defendants;
(2) Directing the United States Attorney to have
transcribed all grand jury proceedings leading up to the
instant indictment and to provide a copy thereof to counsel
for the Defendant, ROY D. GARNER;
(3) Directing the U.S. Attorney to disclose to counsel
for ROY D. GARNER all evidence known to him favorable
to the Defendant on the issue of his guilt or innocence.
The within motions are based on the within affidavit
Notice of Motion and Motions 6.
attached hereto, the Points and Authorities attached hereto,
the records and files in the above-entitled cause, and any and
all other matters which may be presented prior to or at the
time of the hearing of said motions.
Respectfully submitted,
Alan Saltzman
Attorney for Defendant
Affidavit of Alan Saltzman
State of California )
) ss.
County of Los Angeles )
ALAN SALTZMAN states under oath the following:
1. That he is an attorney retained to represent
the Defendant, ROY D. GARNER, in the within action:
RE: SEVERANCE MOTION.
Your affiant is informed and believes and there-
on alleges that the Defendant, ROY D. GARNER, would
be placed in a dilemma so far as presenting his case to the
jury is concerned if he were tried with any of the other
co-Defendants because of the statements and conduct of
the said co-Defendants, and because of the fact that it
might become encumbant upon counsel for any co-Defend-
ant to argue his client’s innocence based on the guilt of
ROY D. GARNER, which would operate to the obvious
prejudice of ROY D. GARNER, and that, therefore, fairness
demands that the moving party, ROY D. GARNER, be tried
Affidavit of Alan Saltzman 7.
separately.
Your affiant is further informed and believes and
thereon alleges that there are acts, declarations and conduct
which the Government proposes to offer during the course
of the trial which would be admissible only against one of
the co-Defendants, and that it would be impossible for the
jury to consider said evidence only against the declarant or
actor.
Your affiant further believes that certain co-
Defendants have made certain admissions or statements
to witnesses which would be hearsay as to the Defendant,
ROY D. GARNER, but that the jury would not be able
to exclude such admissions by one co-Defendant when
considering the guilt or innocence of the Defendant, ROY
D. GARNER.
Your affiant has been informed by the U. S.
Attorney that there are certain statements which have been
made by one or more of the Defendants which implicate
Defendant, ROY D.GARNER ._..
[At the time of the preparation of this
appendix, the subsequent page of the
Affidavit of Alan Saltzman was found
to be missing from the copy of the Clerk’s
Transcript furnished counsel. At time of
printing, this page had still not been obtain-
ed. The record will be supplemented with
this information. |
Memorandum of Points and Authorities
Memorandum of Points and Authorities (Severance) 8. Memorandum of Points and Authorities 9.
(Transcript of Grand Jury Testimony)
Rule 14 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedures
provides for separate trials if the Defendant would be preju-
diced by the joinder of Defendants
Transcript of Grand Jury Testimony:
In United States vs. Youngblood, 379 Fed. 2d 365
(1967), the Second Circuit Court of Appeals establishes the
without the Court’s aid, because powerless itself
to compel the testimony of witnesses. It is the
Court’s process which summons the witness to
attend and give testimony, and it is the court
which must compel a witness to testify, if after
appearing he refuses to do so.”
rule that upon the request of defense counsel, the court
shall order that he be allowed to examine the grand jury
testimony of any witnesses who testifies at the trial. The
Re: Disclosure of Evidence Favorable Re: Guilt:
In Brady vs. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S. Ct. 1194,
10 L. Ed. 2d 215 (decided May 13, 1963), the Supreme
can establish that disclosure would jeopardize national secunty Court stated as follows:
Court notes that an order will not be made if the Government
or other significant interest. The Court expressly establishes
that defense counsel is not required to show a “particularized
need” for the Grand Jury Transcript. The “particularized
need”’ standard authorized in Dennis vs. United States, 384
U.S. 855, 86 Supreme Court 1840, 16 L Ed. 2d 973 (1966)
is held to be not mandatory and is discarded because of the
buraen placed on the trial judges in applying it. Said burden
consists of an in camera search for inconsistencies. The Court
further declared that an alternative ground for allowing dis-
covery of the Grand Jury Transcript is the language of Rule 6
of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedures which gives to
trial courts discretion to authorize disclosure of the transcript
of Grand Jury Proceedings
In Brown vs. United States, 359 U.S. 41, 48, 3 L. Ed. 2d
609, 616, 79 S. Ct 539, the Court states:
““A grand jury is clothed with great independence
in many areas, but it remains an appendage of the
Court, powerless to perform its investigative function
“We now hold that the suppression by the prose-
cution of evidence favorable to an accused upon
request violates Due Process where the evidence
is material either to guilt or to punishment,
irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the
prosecution.”
Respectfully submitted, '
/s/ Alan Saltzman
Attorney for Defendant
INDICTMENT 10.
[18 U.S.C. 8371: Conspiracy; 18 U.S.C. § 1084: Interstate
Transmission of Wagering Information; 18 U.S.C. § 1952;
Interstate Transportation in Aid of Racketeering; 18 U.S.C.
§ 2: Aiding and Abetting.|
In the United States District Court, Central District of
California, December, 1968 Grand Jury.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v CLAR-
ENCE A. SWANK (aka JACK SWANK); LYLE K. BE %GE;
BERNARD I. BERNSTEIN; NICHOLAS P. DE SISTO,
JR.; WAYNE DONAWAY (aka BABE DONAWAY); ROY
D. GARNER; HAROLD W. GOLDBAUM; EMERY L.
LONG; GEORGE SCOVILLE; Defendants.
No. 5356 Crim.
{FILED JANUARY 22, 1970]
The Grand Jury Charges:
COUNT ONE
{18 U.S.C. § 371]
Commencing prior to January |, 1968, and continuing
to the date of the return of this indictment, defendants
CLARENCE A. SWANK (also known as JACK SWANK),
LYLE K. BERGE, BERNARD IL. BERNSTEIN, NICHOLAS
P. DE SISTO, JR., WAYNE DONAWAY, (also known as
BABE DONAWAY), ROY D. GARNER, HAROLD W. GOLD-
BAUM, EMERY L. LONG, GEORGE SCOVILLE, and their
unindicted co-conspirators William O. Lawler, (also known
as Bankroll Bill), Lois J. Rusch, Lynn Marmor (also known
as Lennie Moore), and Kenneth M_ Brandyberry (also known
as Kenneth Miller), agreed, confederated and conspired
together to commit offenses against the United States as
follows:
(a) To engage in the business of betting and wagering
7
Indictment 11
and to use wire communication facilities for the transmission
in interstate commerce of bets and wagers and information
assisting in the placing of bets and wagers, in violation of
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1084;
(b) To travel in interstate commerce and use facilities
in interstate commerce with intent to (1) distribute the
proceeds of unlawful activity, namely: a business enterprise
involving gambling and bribery offenses in violation of the
laws of California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, and of the
United States; and (2) promote, manage, establish, carry on,
and facilitate the promotion, management, establishment and
carrying on of said unlawful activity; and thereafter to per-
form and attempt to perform acts specified in (1) and (2)
above, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section
1952;
(c) To carry into effect, and attempt to carry into
effect a scheme in commerce to influence by bribery sport-
ing contests, namely: horse races, with knowledge that the
purpose of such scheme was to influence said contests by
bribery, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sec-
tion 224.
The object of the conspiracy was as follows:
defendants and their unindicted co-conspirators would
arrange to fix horse races, by means of bribery, injecting
stimulants in horses, and other means, and would secure
information regarding particular horses and jockeys from
sources unavailable to the general public. Based upon these
arrangements and this information, defendants would attempt
to place and place wagers on particular horses In order to
maintain high pari-mutuel odds, and in order to avoid
others not party to the conspiracy placing wagers on the
Indictment 12.
same horses, wagers were placed with bookmakers, away from
the track, shortly before starting time of the race in which the
particular horse was running. Defendants and their unindicted
co-conspirators would travel in interstate commerce and use -
facilities in interstate commerce for the purpose of arranging
for wagers to be placed, and to place and attempt to place
wagers. Defendants and their unindicted co-conspirators
would use wire communication facilities to transmit in inter-
state commerce wagers and information assisting in the
placing of wagers.
To effect the objects of the conspiracy, defend-
ants and their unindicted co-conspirators committed divers
overt acts in the Central District of California, including the
following:
1. Onor about May 23, 1968, unindicted co-con-
spirator William O. Lawler, (also known as Bankroll Bill),
and defendant CLARENCE A. SWANK, (also known as
JACK SWANK), attempted to place and placed wagers on
the horse “Mister Fourway”’, entered in the seventh race
at Golden Gate Fields, Albany, California, on May 23, 1968.
2. Onor about September 25, 1968, defendant
EMERY L. LONG telephoned defendant ROY D. GARNER
in Upland, California.
3. Onor about September 25, 1968, defendant
CLARENCE A. SWANK, (also known as JACK SWANK),
telephoned defendant ROY D. GARNER in Upland, CAlif-
ornia.
4. Onor about September 25, 1968, defendant
EMERY L. LONG caused the injection of amphetamine,
a stimulant drug, into the horse ““Deerwood Duke,”
entered in the twelfth race at Pomona Fairgrounds, Pomona,
Indictment 13
California, on September 25, 1968.
5. On or about September 25, 1968, defendant
CLARENCE A. SWANK, (also known as JACK SWANK),
telephoned unindicted co-conspirator Lynn Marmor, (also
known as Lennie Moore), in Houston, Texas.
6. On or about September 25, 196%, defendant
CLARENCE A. SWANK, (also known as JACK SWANK),
telephoned defendant BERNARD I. BERNSTEIN in Bever-
ly Hills, California.
7. On or about September 25, 1968, defendant
BERNARD I. BERNSTEIN telephoned defendant HAROLD
W. GOLDBAUM in Las Vegas, Nevada.
8. On or about September 25, 1968. defendant
CLARENCE A. SWANK, (also known as JACK SWANK),
telephoned defendant LYLE K. BERGE in Buena Park,
California.
9. On or about Septernber 25, 1968, defendant
LYLE K. BERGE telephoned unindicted co-conspirator
Kenneth M. Brandyberry, (also known as Kenneth Miller),
in Downey, California.
10. On or about September 25, 1968, unindicted co-
conspirators William O. Lawler (also known as Bankroll Bill),
Lynn Marmor, (also known as Lennie Moore), Kenneth M.
Brandyberry, (also known as Kenneth Miller), and defendants
CLARENCE A. SWANK, (also known as JACK SWANK),
LYLE BERGE, BERNARD I. BERNSTEIN and HAROLD
W. GOLDBAUM attempted to place and placed wagers on
the horse “Deerwood Duke,” entered in the twelfth race at
Pomona Fairgrounds, Pomona, California, on September 25,
1968.
11. On or about September 27, 1968, defendant
Indictment 14.
EMERY L. LONG, in Las Vegas, Nevada, telephoned defend-
ant ROY D. GARNER, in Upland, California.
12. On or about November 28, 1968, defendant ROY
D. GARNER telephoned defendant CLARENCE A. SWANK,
(also known as JACK SWANK), in Los Alamitos, California.
13. Onor about November 28, 1968, defendant
CLARENCE A. SWANK, (also known as JACK SWANK),
telephoned unindicted co-conspirator William O. Lawler,
(also known as Bankroll Bill), in Gardena, California.
14. On or about November 28, 1968, unindicted co-
conspirator William O. Lawler, (also known as Bankroll Bill),
and defendant CLARENCE A. SWANK, (also known as JACK
SWANK), attempted to place and placed wagers on the horse
“‘Maretazo II,” entered in the ninth race at Bay Meadows
Racetrack, San Mateo, California on November 28, 1968.
15. On or about December 3, 1968, defendant ROY
D. GARNER telephoned defendant CLARENCE A. SWANK,
(also known as JACK SWANK), in Los Alamitos, California.
16. On or about December 3, 1968, defendant
CLARENCE A. SWANK, (also known as JACK SWANK)
telephoned unindicted co-conspirator William Lawler, (also
known as Bankroll Bill), in Gardena, Calfornia.
17. Onor about December 4, 1968, unindicted co-
conspirator William O. Lawler, (also known as Bankroll Bill),
and defendant CLARENCE A. SWANK, (also known as
JACK SWANK), attempted to place and placed wagers on
the horse “‘King Kildare,” entered in the fifth race at Bay
Meadows Racetrack, San Mateo, California, on December 4,
1968.
18. On or about April 18, 1969, unindicted co-con-
spirator William O. Lawler, (also known as Bankroll Bill),
Indictment 15
telephoned defendant WAYNE DONAWAY, (also known as
BABE DONAWAY), in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
19. Onor about April 18, 1969, unindicted co-con-
spirator William O. Lawler, (also known as Bankroll Bill),
mailed money orders and cashier’s checks totaling $4,200.00
to defendant WAYNE DONAWAY, (also known as BABE
DONAWAY ), in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
20. Onor about April 10, 1969, unindicted co-con-
spirator William O. Lawler, (also known as Bankroll Bill), gave
cash totaling $4,000.00 to defendant NICHOLAS P DE
SISTO, JR.
21. Onor about April 10, 1969, defendant NICHO-
LAS P. DE SISTO, JR. traveled to Cleveland, Ohio.
22. Onor about April 10, 1969, unindicted co-con-
spirator William O. Lawler, (also known as Bankroll Bill)
telephoned defendant GEORGE SCOVILLE in San Jose,
California.
23. Onor about April 10, 1969, unindicted co-con-
spirator William O. Lawler, (also known as Bankroll Bill),
mailed money orders and cashier’s checks totaling $1,000
to defendant GEORGE SCOVILLE in San Jose, California.
24. Onor about April 18, 1969, defendant GEORGE
SCOVILLE traveled to Reno, Nevada.
25. Onor about April 18, 1969, unindicted co-con-
spirator William O. Lawler, (also known as Bankroll Bill),
and defendants CLARENCE A. SWANK, (also known as
JACK SWANK), WAYNE DONAWAY, (also known as
BABE DONAWAY), NICHOLAS P DE SISTO, JR., and
GEORGE SCOVILLE attempted to place and placed wagers
on the horse “‘Prize Candy,” entered in the second race at
Gulfstream Park, Hallandale, Florida, on April 18, 1969.
Indictment 16.
COUNT TWO
[18 U.S.C. 68 1084, 2)
On or about September 25, 1968, at 5:38 p.m., defend-
ant CLARENCE A. SWANK, (also known as JACK SWANK),
being engaged in the business of betting and wagering, know-
ingly used a wire communication facility, namely: a telephone,
for the transmission in interstate commerce from Gardena,
California, within the Central District of California, to Houston,
Texas, of bets and wagers and information assisting in the plac-
ing of bets and wagers on sporting events and contests.
At said time and place, defendant ROY D. GARNER
aided, abetted, counselled, induced and procured the commis-
sion of the offense alleged above.
COUNT THREE
[18 U.S.C. 881952, 2]
On or about September 25, 1968, defendant CLARENCE
A. SWANK, (also known as JACK SWANK), and Lynn Marmor,
(also known as Lennie Moore), used the telephone, a facility in
interstate commerce between Gardena, California, within the
Central District of California, and Houston, Texas, with intent
to promote, manage, establish, carry on, and facilitate the pro-
motion, management, establishment and carrying on of an
unlawful activity, namely: a business enterprise involving
gambling and bribery offenses in violation of California Penal
Code, Sections 337a, 337b, and 337f; Texas Penal Code,
Articles 648 and 652a; and Title 18, United States Code,
Sections 224 and 1084; and thereafter defendant CLARENCE
A. SWANK, (also known as JACK SWANK), and Lynn Mar-
mor, (also known as Lennie Moore), performed and attempt-
ed to perform acts to promote, manage, establish, carry on, and
Indictment 17.
facilitate the promotion, management, establishment and
carrying on of said unlawful activity, including the follow-
ing: CLARENCE A. SWANK, (also known as JACK SWANK),
and Lynn Marmor, (also known as Lennie Moore), attempted
to place and placed wagers on the horse “Deerwood Duke,”
entered in the twelfth race at Pomona Fairgrounds, Pomona,
California, on September 25, 1968.
At said time and place, defendant ROY D. GARNER
aided, abetted, counselled, induced and procured the com-
mission of the offense alleged above.
COUNT FOUR
[18 USC. §8 1084; 2)
On or about September 25, 1968, at 5:39 p.m., defend-
ants BERNARD I. BERNSTEIN and HAROLD W. GOLD-
BAUM, being engaged’in the business of betting and wager-
ing, knowingly used a wire communication facility, namely:
a telephone, for the transmission in interstate commerce
from Beverly Hills, California, within the Central District
of California, to Las Vegas, Nevada, of bets and wagers and
information assisting in the placing of bets and wagers on
sporting events and contests.
At said time and place, defendants CLARENCE A.
SWANK, (also known as JACK SWANK), and ROY D.
GARNER aided, abetted, counselled, induced and procured
the commission of the offense alleged above.
COUNT FIVE
[18 U.S.C. 68 1952; 2]
On or about September 25, 1968, defendants BER-
NARD I. BERNSTEIN and HAROLD W. GOLDBAUM used
Indictment 18.
the telephone, a facility in interstate commerce, between
Beverly Hills, California, within the Central District of
California, and Las Vegas, Nevada, with intent to promote,
manage, establish, carry on, and facilitate the promotion,
management, establishment and carrying on of an unlawful
activity, namely: a business enterprise involving gambling
and bribery offenses in violation of California Penal Code,
Sections 337a, 337b, and 337f; and Title 18, United States
Code, Sections 224 and 1084; and thereafter defendants
BERNARD I. BERNSTEIN and HAROLD W. GOLDBAUM
performed and attempted to perform acts to promote,
manage, establish, carry on, and facilitate the promotion,
management, establishment and carrying on of said unlawful
activity including the following: defendants BERNARD I.
BERNSTEIN and HAROLD W. GOLDBAUM attempted to
place and placed wagers on the horse “‘Deerwood Duke,”
entered in the twelfth race at Pomona Fairgrounds, Pomona,
California, on September 25, 1968.
At said time and place, defendants CLARENCE A.
SWANK, (also known as JACK SWANK), and ROY D.
GARNER aided, abetted, counselled, induced and pro-
cured the commission of the offense alleged above.
COUNT SIX
[18 U.S.C. § 1952]
On or about September 27, 1968, defendants EMERY
L. LONG and ROY D. GARNER used the telephone, a
facility in interstate commerce, between Las Vegas, Nevada,
and Upland, California, within the Central District of Califor-
nia, with intent to promote, manage, establish, carry on, and
facilitate the promotion, management, establishment and
Indictment 19
carrying on of an unlawful activity, namely: a business
enterprise involving gambling and bribery offenses in viola-
tion of California Penal Code, Sections 337a, 337b and 337f;
and Title 18, United States Code, Sections 224 and 1084; and
thereafter defendants EMERY L LONG and ROY D. GAR-
NER distributed the proceeds of said unlawful activity.
COUNT SEVEN
[18 U.S.C. 88 1084; 2)
On or about April 18, 1969, William O. Lawler, (also
known as “Bankroll Bill’”’), and defendant WAYNE DONA-
WAY, (also known as BABE DONAWAY), being engaged
in the business of betting and wagering, knowingly used a
wire communication facility, to wit: a telephone, for the
transmission in interstate commerce from Gardena, Califor-
nia, within the Central District of California, to Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania, of bets and wagers and information assisting
in the placing of bets and wagers on sporting events and
contests.
At said time and place, defendants CLARENCE A.
SWANK, (also known as JACK SWANK), and ROY D.
GARNER ided, abetted, counselled, induced and procured
the commission of the offense alleged above.
COUNT EIGHT
[18 U.S.C. 681952; 2)
On or about April 18, 1969, William O. Lawler, (also
known as Bankroll Bill), and defendant WAYNE DONAWAY,
(also known as BABE DONAWAY), used the mail, a facility
in interstate commerce, between Gardena, California, within
the Central District of California, and Philadelphia, Pennsyl-
Indictment 20.
vania, with intent to promote, manage, establish, carry on, and
facilitate the promotion, management, establishment and carry-
ing on of an unlawful activity, namely: a business enterprise
involving gambling offenses in violation of California Penal
Code, Section 337a; Title 18, Pennsylvania Statutes, Section
4607; and Title 18, United States Code, Section 1084; and
thereafter William O. Lawler, (also known as Bankroll Bill),
and defendant WAYNE DONAWAY, (also known as BABE
DONAWAY), performed and attempted to perform acts to
promote, manage, establish, carry on, and facilitate the pro-
motion, management, establishment and carrying on of said
unlawful activity, including the following: William O. Lawler,
(also known as Bankroll Bill), and defendant WAYNE DONA-
WAY, (also known as BABE DONAWAY), attempted to place
and placed wagers on the horse “Prize Candy,” entered in the
second race at Gulfstream Park, Hallandale, Florida, on
April 18, 1969.
At said time and place, defendants CLARENCE A.
SWANK, (also known as JACK SWANK), and ROY D.
GARNER aided, abetted, counselled, induced and procured
the commission of the offense alleged above.
COUNT NINE
[18 U.S.C. 681952; 2)
On or about April 10, 1969, defendant NICHOLAS P.
DE SISTO JR.., traveled in interstate commerce from Los
Angeles County, in the Central District of California, to
Cleveland, Ohio, with intent to promote, manage, establish,
carry on, and facilitate the promotion, management, establish-
ment and carrying on of an unlawful activity, namely; a
business enterprise involving gambling offenses in violation
Indictment 21
of California Penal Code, Section 337a; Ohio Revised Code,
Section 2915.05; and Title 18, United States Code, Section
1084; and thereafter defendant NICHOLAS P DE SISTO,
JR. performed and attempted to perform acts to promote,
manage, establish, carry on, and facilitate the promotion,
management, establishment and carrying on of said unlawful
activity, including the following: defendant NICHOLAS P
DE SISTO, JR. attempted to place and placed wagers on
the horse “Prize Candy,” entered in the second race at
Gulfstream Park, Hallandale, Florida, on April 18, 1969
At said time and place, defendants CLARENCE A
SWANK, (also known as JACK SWANK), and ROY D
GARNER aided, abetted, counselled, induced and procured
the commission of the offense alleged above.
COUNT TEN
{18 USC. 681952; 2)
On or about April 18, 1969, defendant GEORGE
SCOVILLE travelled in interstate commerce from San Jose,
California, to Reno, Nevada, with intent to promote, manage,
establish, carry on, and facilitate the promotion, management,
establishment and carrying on of an unlawful activity, name-
ly: a business enterprise in Los Angeles County in the Central
District of California, involving gambling offenses in violation
of California Penal Code, Section 337a; and Title 18, United
States Code, Section 1084; and thereafter defendant GEORGE
SCOVILLE performed and attempted to perform acts to
promote, manage, establish, carry on, and facilitate the
promotion, management, establishment and carrying on of
said unlawful activity, including the following: defendant
GEORGE SCOVILLE attempted to place and placed wagers
PROPOSED CORRECTED INDICTMENT 23.
Indictment 22.
on the horse “Prize Candy,” entered in the second race at
Gulfstream Park, Hallandale, Florida, on April 18, 1969. ie In the United States District Court, Central District of
At said time and place, defendants CLARENCE A California.
SWANK, (also known as JACK SWANK), and ROY D. int UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROY D.
GARNER aided, abetted, counselled, induced and procured GARNER, Defendant
the commission of the offense alleged above. No. 53564WF)-Crim.
[FILED AUGUST 4, 1970]
A TRUE BILL Plaintiff, United States of America, herewith submits a
proposed corrected indictment for the re-trial of the above
INA MORRIS defendant. The “corrections” consist of the striking of all
allegations which have been rendered surplusage by prior
FOREMAN proceedings and rulings of the Court, including the following:
(1) References to other defendants and other offenses
no longer on trial have been removed from the
heading;
(2) The names of defendants Berge, Bernstein, De Sis-
to, Donaway, Goldbaum, Long and Scoville have
been removed from the list of conspirators at lines
26 - 29 of page |;
(3) All references to William O Lawler as “(also known
io as Bankroll Bill)” have been removed '
as (4) The overt acts alleged to have been performed by
persons other than those still named as co-conspir-
ators have been removed, including overt acts num:
bered 2, 4, 7, 9, 11, 18, 19, 21 and 24;
(S) Count Three through Ten have been eliminated .
WM. MATTHEW BYRNE, JR.
United States Attorney
Respectfully submitted,
ROBERT L. MEYER
United States Attorney
Proposed Corrected Indictment 24.
DAVID R. NISSEN
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Criminal Division
/s/ GERALD F. UELMEN
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Plaintiff
United States of America
| Accompanying the aforesaid was an
affidavit of service showing service August
4, 1970 on Burton Marks and a corrected
Indictment reflecting the changes proposed
and indicating charges under 18 U.S.C. § 371
Conspiracy; 18 U.S.C. § 1084: Interstate
Transmission of Wagering Information;
18 U.S.C.82: Aiding and Abetting. |
APPLICATION FOR ORDER 25.
COMPELLING TESTIMONY
18 U.S.C. 82514
In the United States District Court, Central District of
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROY D.
GARNER, Defendant.
No. 5356(WF)}-CD.
[FILED OCTOBER 29, 1970!
The United States of America hereby moves the Court
for an Order instructing CLARENCE A. “JACK” SWANK
to testify and produce evidence pursuant to the provisions
of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2514, and respect-
fully represents as follows:
1. CLARENCE A. “JACK” SWANK is appearing as
a witness in the above-captioned case, a trial on an indict-
ment charging violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1084 and conspiracy
to violate 18 U.S.C. §§ 224, 1084 and 1952.
2. This application is made in good faith, with the
approval of the Attorney General of the United States, by
the United States Attorney, in whose judgment the testimony
of CLARENCE A. “JACK” SWANK is necessary to the public
interest.
WHEREFORE, the United States of America requests
the Court to order CLARENCE A. “JACK” SWANK to
answer questions and produce evidence relating to all matters
pertinent to the pending trial, pursuant to the provisions of
Title 18, United States Code, Section 2514.
Respectfully submitted,
ROBERT L. MEYER
United States Attorney
Application for Order 26.
Compelling Testimony
DAVID R. NISSEN
Assistant U. S. Attorney
Chief, Criminal Division
/s/ GERALD F. UELMEN
Special Assistant U. S. Attorney
Attorneys for Plaintiff
United States of America
Affidavit of Robert L. Meyer
State of California )
) ss
County of Los Angeles)
ROBERT L. MEYER, being first sworn, deposes and
says:
1. Lam United States Attorney for the Central Dis-
trict of California.
2. This application is made in good faith with the
approval of the Attorney General of the United States.
3. In my judgment the testimony of CLARENCE A.
“JACK” SWANK sought is necessary to the public interest
and material to the case of United States v. Roy D. Garner,
No. 5356-(WF)-CD, presently in trial.
/s/ ROBERT L. MEYER
Notarized by Kathryn A. Clark
on the 28th day of October, 1970.
ORDER 27.
(Compelling Testimony of Clarence A. “Jack’’ Swank)
In the United States District Court, Central District of
California.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROY D.
GARNER, Defendant.
No. 5356-4(WF)-CD.
[OCTOBER 29, 1970]
The United States of America, having made written and
oral dpplication for an Order compelling CLARENCE A. “JACK”
SWANK to testify and produce evidence in the trial of the above
case, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 2514;
and
CLARENCE A. “JACK” SWANK, having declined to ans-
wer questions by claiming his privilege against self-incrimina-
tion; and
The application for immunity having been approved by
the Attorney General of the United States and made by the
United States Attorney in whose judgment the testimony
sought is necessary to the public interest, it is
ORDERED that CLARENCE A. “JACK” SWANK
appear forthwith and testify and produce evidence with
respect to all matters under inquiry in said trial.
DATED: This 29 day of October, 1970.
/s/ WARREN A. FERGUSON
United States District Judge
JUDGMENT AND COMMITMENT 28,
Judgment and Commitment 29.
surety.
IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk deliver a certified
copy of this judgment and commitment to the United
States Marshal or other qualified officer and that the
copy serve as the commitment of the defendant.
In the United States District Court, for the Central
District of California.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROY D. GARNER
No. 5356-Criminal.
[FILED NOVEMBER 16, 1970}
On this 16th day of November, 1970, came the attorney
for the government and the defendant appeared in person and
by counsel, Burton Marks, Retained
IT IS ADJUDGED that the defendant upon his plea of
Not Guilty, and a verdict of Guilty, has been convicted of the
offense of Conspiracy, in violation of Title 18, United States
/s/ WARREN J. FERGUSON
United States District Judge
by: /s/ K. J. Murphy, Jr.,
Deputy Clerk
Code, Section 371, as charged in count one of the Indictment
in ten counts filed the 22nd day of January, 1970, and the
court having asked the defendant whether he has anything to
say why judgment should not be pronounced, and no sufficient
cause to the contrary being shown or appearing to the Court,
IT IS ADJUDGED that the defendant is guilty as charged
and convicted.
IT IS ADJUDGED that the defendant is hereby commit-
ted to the custody of the Attorney General or his authorized
NOTATION RE NINTH CIRCUIT
The majority and dissenting opinions of the Ninth
Circuit Court of Appeals appear in the Appendix for the
Petition for Writ of Certiorari as Exhibit “A.”
The Order denying the Petition for Rehearing
appears as Exhibit “B”’ to said petition.
representative for imprisonment for a period of Two (2) years
on count one.
IT IS ADJUDGED that the defendant shall become
eligible for parole at such time as the United States Board
of Parole shall determine as provided in Title 18, United States
Code, Section 4208 (a) (2).
IT IS ADJUDGED that the execution of sentence
herein is stayed until November 30, 1970 at 2:00 p.m., the
defendant’s bond exonerated upon his surrender or upon
posting an appeal bond in the amount of $10,000 00 personal
EXCERPTS FROM REPORTER’S TRANSCRIPT 30
[Page 59, line 3 - page 67, line 10}
I understand you have some motions on matters outside
the presence of the jury, Mr. Marks.
MR. MARKS; Yes, your Honor. | will try to be brief
The Court received the opposition that I have to the
introduction of certain telephone calls, and the Government’s
opposition
I would like to be heard in two respects. Number one:
I would like to orally argue in support of my position;
And secondly, I would like to suggest to the Court that
I think we are going to be able to arrive at a stipulation - -
well, let me give you my argument and then my suggestions.
As I see the thrust of Mr. Uelmen’s opposition to my
motion, which he deems a motion to suppress, and which I
suggest may be an objection to the introduction of the evi-
dence because it is not at all clear that a violation of Rule
605 would come within the purview of Rule 41 - - Section
605 would come within the purview of Rule 41 as a suppres-
sion motion.
Assuming that it does, or assuming that an objection to
the introduction of the evidence is [60] appropriate, |
suggest that it is obvious, not only from the Government’s
argument and the intended use that these communications
with various telephone records are going to be put together,
that they are expressly intended to divulge communications.
If my recollection is clear, Mr. Uelmen’s argument - -
I think it was around the time of the motions for judgment
of acquittal where he stated something to the effect that
the various communication lines on the chart, in fact spoke
Excerpts from Reporter’s Transcript 31
louder than words, they didn’t have to have the communica-
tions in there, that they expressed the words that were stated
between Party A and Party B on those telephone toll records
because the pattern itself divulged what the communication
was about, taken in consideration with all the other evidence.
Therefore it is the express intention of the Government
to use the telephone toll records as a communication, which
I think is prohibited.
Now, the basis for 605 - - and I think the fact that the
use of the telephone in and of itself - - is that you are suppos-
ed to have the right to privacy, a telephone I think, today
being within the purview of - - it is Government controlled,
it is a monopoly, it is a public utility, it bears the same status
as the mails.
A person has the right to assume that his [61] telephone
calls to wherever made will not be divulged except upon his
consent and permission. And he has that same right to
privacy in his own toll records as in fact the disclosure of
his information.
The fact that they were obtained here by subpoena
I think would be irrelevant unless the subpoena was backed
up by an affidavit in support of the subpoena, which would
be sufficient to establish probable cause for the existence of
a crime, in order to have the Government be able, either by
subpoena or otherwise, to take somebody’s private property
and utilize it.
So that essentially is my argument in opposition to
the Government’s opposition. I think that we are dealing
with an unlawful use of telephone records.
Now, it is my opinion that if there is a prima facie
illegality established, the possibility of a prima facie
Excerpts from Reporter’s Transcript 32.
illegality by the Government, then the burden is on the
Government - - not on the defendant - - to show that the
records which they have were lawfully obtained.
Now, as I understand the procedure, and I don’t know
whether Mr. Uelmen is willing to stipulate to this precisely
in this form, all of the telephone records were in fact original-
ly obtained through the use of grand jury subpoena, and were
not obtained otherwise.
However, the — as I understand it there was an [62] ex-
tended investigation with the grand jury mee*ing practically
every week and the Government presenting evidence with
respect to this investigation for almost a year before the
indictments issued
Now, during the course of the investigation - - I use the
words in quotes - - the Government secured the gvidence of
the toll records through grand jury subpoenas. They did
not —- I would be willing to venture a guess - - produce the
records at the time of the grand jury hearings for the grand
jury to hear the evidence, but rather they gathered the evi-
dence into their own investigatory staff through the use of
subpoenas and then drew the charts which they later pre-
sented here to the Court, and I believe probably to the grand
jury, at least a synopsis of what was contained in the records.
Now, in my opinion this would be an abuse of the grand
jury subpoena process in two respects:
Number one, I would suspect - - and I think that it is the
Weeks case that is the original case that dealt with subpoenas
as being searches and seizures - - in any case I doubt whether
the affidavits in support of the subpoenas were sufficient
under any theory. And even if they were sufficient that
the use of them was contrary to the intention of the statute
Excerpts from Reporter’s Transcript 33.
as to the manner in which they could be used.
In other words, they could only be used to [63] present
to a Court or a grand jury, which is an arm of the Court, but
not used as a method of obtaining investigatory leads by the
Government, unless there has in fact been a compliance with
the general rules of search and seizure to obtain the records.
So I wanted to suggest to the Court that we may be
able to arrive at a stipulation as to how the records were
obtained and how they were used.
I would like to have a ruling from the Court as to
whether or not, assuming we can’t arrive at a stipulation, as
to whether or not the Government has the burden, or the
defense has the burden of showing that there was an unlawful-
ly obtained telephone record in violation of Section 605, and
that therefore all of the proceedings flowing from that are
tainted, and as such there has been no attenuation of the
taint, and it would not be admissible in evidence.
What I am asking is that the Court first establish whether
or not we have - - first make a ruling as to whether or not
they can use the toll records obtained, I believe in violation
of 605.
Secondly, if there isn’t that direct violation as to whether
or not the Government has the burden of showing that they
were produced lawfully, if the defense has such a burden, can
we have, during the course of the trial or sometime before the
trial, a definitive ruling by the Court [64] as to whether or
not these toll records can be used.
I also have the final argument, and that is that under the
authority of the case called State versus Timms, 9, Ohio 2nd,
which is a Supreme Court of Ohio, I think I cited it to the
Court once before, the Ohio Supreme Court held that the
Excerpts from Reporter’s Transcript 34
busines records exceptions to the hearsay rule is a denial of
confrontation of witnesses
And the Government is, in this instance, trying to
establish that business records of the telephone company
are somehow admissible to prove the truth of a particular
conversation, or the existence of some type of communica-
tion.
And if they are taking that position, which I believe
they are, then the records themselves are an attempt to
establish a fact which is hearsay, and as I say, we have no
way to examine the person who actually made the records,
or the machine, and therefore they would not be admissible
under that alternative theory
I think that - - I don’t know whether I have made
myself clear, your Honor
THE COURT: Just don’t repeat it.
MR. MARKS: I won't.
THE COURT: Mr. Uelmen?
MR UELMEN: Your Honor, with respect to the first
point of who bears the burden of proof, I believe the law is
quite clear, I think the moving party on a motion to [65]
suppress does bear the burden of initially showing the illeg-
ality in the acquisition of the evidence.
And a recent case dealt precisely with that point in a
motion where a similar argument was being made with
respect to telephone toll records is the Tenth Circuit Nolan
case, which we have cited in our memorandum, and which
holds directly that the burden is on the moving party.
However, we have offered to stipulate with Mr. Marks
that the method by which these particular records were
acquired, telephone toll records were acquired was by
Excerpts from Reporter’s Transcript 35
means of a subpoena to produce the records before the grand
jury, at which time the records were produced.
Our basic position is that, first of all, Section 605 has
no application whatsoever to telephone toll records because
they are simply not communications that Section 605 was
designed to protect.
That is the approach taken by the Second Circuit case
of Covella which holds in essence that Section 605, inter-
preted in a common sense manner, has nothing to do with
toll records kept in the ordinary course of business, because
this is not the interception of a communication.
And if it is not a communication at the time it was
intercepted, and the record is kept by the telephone com-
pany, it does not then, and is not going to become a com-
munication because of the use to which the record was put
[66] by the Government
There is simply no general right to privacy as to
records that are kept in the ordinary course of any busi-
ness, bank records or anything else are subject to the
subpoena powers of the court.
We would also alternatively argue that even if we
were to say that Section 605 does apply to telephone toll rec-
ords, that the means of acquisition of these records come
within the exception recognized in Section 605 whereby
those engaged in receiving and transmitting records or com-
munications can divulge them pursuant to a lawful subpoena
And finally with respect to the Ohio versus Timms case,
your Honor, of course that has no application to the Federal
Business Records Act which still recognizes the hearsay
exception in Federal Courts for records kept in the ordinary
course of business.
Excerpts from Reporter’s Transcript 36.
There were at least three cases from three different
circuits that have come down within the past year, all of
which have rejected all of the arguments that are being
made by counsel today.
THE COURT: All right
MR. MARKS: Suomitted
THE COURT: I <hink the Government’s position is
the correct one, Mr. Marks.
I feel that as a result of the memoranda which [67]
have been furnished the Court by both sides and the result
of the arguments, that the law is that business toll records
from the telephone companies are not within the prohib-
ition contained in 605. And further that, even if it were,
the subpoena powers of this Court would exempt the pro-
hibition from 605
Insofar as the Federal Government rule on the ad-
missibility of the business records violates the confronta-
tion clause of the Bill of Rights, the cases are legion on
that.
The motion will be denied
[Page 248, line 24 - page 264, line 16)
BY MR. UELMEN:
Q Now Mr. Foote, during the - - does the Horse [249]
Racing Board also maintain any records of the results of
horse races?
A Yes, we do.
Q All right. In what form are these records kept?
~
Excerpts from Reporter’s Transcript 37
A The chart books of the Triangle Publications.
They are - - during each race, and maybe thereafter - -
racing charts, performance charts are made of every race.
And they are published in the Daily Racing Form, which is
recognized as the official record keeping publishing house
for racing in the United States.
MR MARKS: Objection, move to strike the last
statement of the witness as outside of his expertise and
hearsay, that it is recognized as the official - -
THE COURT: On what facts do you base that
statement, Mr. Foote?
THE WITNESS: It is a matter of regulations in the
State of California that it is recognized. And it is recog-
nized, to my knowledge, by the National Association of
State Racing Commissioners, which is the Association made
up of the appointed racing commissioners of every state,
every racing state in the United States and the provinces
of Canada that do have racing, Puerto Rico and Mexico.
THE COURT: Your objection - - excuse me
MR MARKS: I move to strike the answer of the
witness as relating hearsay as far as the regulations of the
[250] State of California are concerned. | don’t believe
any such exists, at least not to my knowledge
And therefore the witness is testifying from know-
ledge which 1s not his own
THE COURT: The objection will be overruled. The
motion will be denied
BY MR. UELMEN:
Q_ Now, sir, do these official records of the races
indicate all of the horses that were entered in a particular
Excerpts from Reporter’s Transcript 38.
race?
A No, no, they don’t indicate that. They would
indicate all those that had been entered and whose starting
was obligatory.
Q_ Now, | will ask you when starting becomes
obligatory after a horse is entered in a race?
A After that time which is known as scratch time,
or declaration time, which is established by the Racing
Association. It is usually in the morning of the day the
horse is to race.
Q Now, the Racing Association is something
different than the Horse Racing Board, is it not?
A Yé@s, it is.
Q What is the Racing Association?
A The Racing Association can be a governmental
[251] entity, such as a County Fair or a private associa-
tion which is licensed by the California Horse Racing
Board to conduct a race meeting at a certain period of
time at a certain location.
Q Now, are the charts that you referred to
records kept in the ordinary course of the business of
the Horse Racing Board?
A Yes.
MR. MARKS: Your Honor, I will object to the
question and move to strike the answer for the purpose
of objecting, on the grounds that this witness is not
qualified to give that answer.
He is a law enforcement officer, not a keeper of
records, and is not qualified to answer such a question.
And the question calls for hearsay and is a con-
clusion of the witness.
Excerpt from Reporter’s Transcript 39.
THE COURT: Your objection, if it is proper, goes only
to weight, Mr. Marks. I will permit you to ask the witness
all the questions you want on cross-examination.
MR. MARKS: Yes, sir.
MR. UELMEN: May the witness be handed Exhibits 1-A
through 1-G.
(Documents marked Plaintiff's Exhibits 1-A
through 1-G for identification.)
(The exhibits were placed before the witness.)
[252]
BY MR. UELMEN:
Q__ Now, you have before you, Mr. Foote, what have
been marked as Exhibits 1-A to 1-G. I will ask you if all of
these exhibits contain charts which have been excised from
the official chart books kept in the ordinary course of business
of the Horse Racing Board?
MR. MARKS: Object to the question as calling for a
conclusion of the witness, without any foundation as to how
the records were brought, and whether he knows of their
excision.
THE COURT: Overruled.
THE WITNESS: Yes, they are
BY MR. UELMEN:
Q Now, the exhibits are arranged according to
particular horses, Mr. Foote. Have you had occasion to
compare the exhibits with the chart books to insure that
the exhibits contain all of the races in which each particular
horse ran during a given period?
A Yes, I have had that opportunity.
Q_ Allright. Let’s start with Exhibit 1-A.
Excerpts from Reporter’s Transcript 40.
A All right.
Q Could you tell us if Exhibit 1-A contains charts
for all of the races in which Sole Support was officially
entered during the years 1967 through 1969? [253]
A Yes.
Q With respect to 1-B, could you tell us if this
exhibit contains charts of all the races in which the horse
Box of Buttons was officially entered during the years
1967 through 1969?
A Yes.
Q__ And with respect to Exhibit 1-C, does that con-
tain all of the charts of all of the races in which Mr. Fourway
was entered officially during the same years?
A Yes.
Q And would the same be true with respect to the
horse Deerwood Duke in Exhibit 1-D?
A Yes.
Q And with respect to the horse Maretazo II in
Exhibit 1-E?
A Yes.
Q And with respect to the horse King Kildare in
Exhibit 1-F?
A Yes.
Q_._ And finally, with respect to the horse Prize
Candy in Exhibit 1-G?
A Yes.
MR. MARKS: Your Honor, may I have the name of
that horse in Exhibit D?
THE COURT: D is Deerwood Duke. [254]
MR. MARKS: Thank you.
MR. UELMEN: Your Honor, at this time we would
eee
Excerpts from Reporter’s Transcript 41.
move the admission in evidence of Exhibits 1-A through 1—G.
THE COURT: If you will reserve your motion until the
conclusion of cross-examination, or redirect examination, Mr.
Uelmen.
MR. UELMEN: Yes, sir.
Q Now Mr. Foote, I am going to ask you to explain
what information is contained on the official charts of a race.
Your Honor, to facilitate this explanation I have made
copies of the chart of one particular race for distribution to
the jury.
THE COURT: Well, you can ask the questions on
voir dire before that is done then, Mr. Marks.
MR. MARKS: Thank you. May I ask them now?
THE COURT: Certainly.
VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION
BY MR. MARKS:
Q_ Mr. Foote, is there some person who reports a
race as it goes along, which eventually arrives at a chart
which you have there?
A _ Several, yes.
Q And how many people? [255]
A Twelve, I would say, at a thoroughbred meeting.
Q__ And do the twelve people who report this race
get together and arrive at a general conclusion as to what
information they are going to put into a particular racing
form, is that correct, sir?
A No, no.
Q Who makes the decision as to what goes into the
racing form?
A The employee of the Daily Racing Form who is
Excerpts from Reporter’s Transcript 42.
assigned to the race track
Q And that person is not a member of the Horse
Racing Board, is he?
A No, he is not.
Q Andhe is not paid by the State to do this, is he?
A No, sir.
Q And the records that he makes are not records
of the State Racing Board, or any other racing association,
is that correct?
A Those particular records are not, no.
Q And those are the records from which the form
is acquired?
A No, sir -- well, those are the basic records, yes,
sir.
Q And whatever is in those basic records prepared
[256] by the employee of the Daily Racing Form really
are an expression of his opinion as to what happened at a
particular race, isn’t that correct?
A I find that hard to answer. No, I wouldn’t say - -
Q Well, --
A It is a matter of opinion.
Q_ Well, there is, for instance, a racing form that
shows how many lengths a horse was behind the winner.
And lengths means a horse’s length, isn’t that right?
The length of a horse?
A Yes.
Q Allright. Are those lengths measured while
the horses are running, or is it somebody expressing an
opinion as to the distance?
A They are measured.
Q By whom?
Excerpts from Reporter’s Transcript 43.
A By anumber of things The electronic timing
at the finish line, the multiple photographs that are made,
photographs of the photo finish, in addition to the movie
camera or the closed circuit TV, which is on video tape.
And then these are reviewed before this is finalized.
In addition the clocker makes notes as to where - -
they have up to three clockers that clock the horses in
[257] various positions.
I wouldn’t say it is one man’s opinion - -
Q_ Well --
A It isa collection of facts - -
Q_ Well, it is the Daily Racing Form’s man’s
collection of whatever facts these other persons have
put together during the course of a race, is that right?
A _ Yes, certainly.
Q__ And the Horse Racing Board takes the Daily
Racing Form, which is a private enterprise, and puts that
into chart books, is that correct?
A No. We don’t publish them, no. It is published
by the Triangle Publications.
Q Which is a private enterprise?
A Yes.
Q__ And you purchase the publications, don’t you?
A Just like law books, we purchase racing forms,
Q All right. What regulation of the State of
California says that the Daily Racing Form is the official
publication and books and records of the California Horse
Racing Association?
A You mean a Section in the -
Q_ Yes.
Excerpts from Reporter’s Transcript 44
California Administrative Code? [258]
Yes.
No, there is none in the - -
There is none, isn’t that correct?
That is correct.
And there is none by statute?
No, there is none by statute.
And the only reason that the California Horse
Racing Association has these particular chart books is
because it helps them in the course of some of their busi-
ness, correct?
A No, we have to buy them. We order them
pursuant to an order of the Board.
Q___ But the Board makes the order, not by any
statute, does it? There is no statute that says that they
must order these books, is that right?
A No, no.
Q__ And there is no regulation that says they must
order these books, is that right?
A Idon’t--
Qs There is none that you know of?
A No, there is no California Administrative Code
regulation, that’s right.
Q__ So the Board - - all the Board does is authorize
the payment of money for the purchase of the books
which you feel are of convenience to the Horse Racing
Association, [259] isn’t that right;
A Well--
Qs This is very valuable information in these chart
books, isn’t that right?
A Absolutely. They are very accurate. That is
why we keep them.
OPrO FH FH PS
Excerpts from the Reporter’s Transcript 4S.
Qs That’s right. But they are not books and records
kept in the business of the California Horse Racing Associa-
tion, are they?
A We keep those in the normal course of our business.
Qs They are purchased, are they not?
A Yes, sir.
Q And they are not kept by the California Horse
Racing Association, is that not correct? They are kept by
the Triangle Publications and purchased by the Cal:fornia
Horse Racing Association, is not that true?
A No. You are mixing your terms, sir.
Q Which employee of the California Board - - what
is the official name?
A California Horse Racing Board.
Q Yes. Which official of the California Horse Racing
Board keeps and maintains the records of the chart books?
A Ido.
You prepare them? [260]
No, I keep the records of them.
You purchase them and put them in your office?
Yes, certainly.
MR. MARKS: I have nothing further, your Honor.
I will object to the admission of any chart books or
forms as not being any official business records.
THE COURT: Mr. Uelmen.
> OP?”
DIRECT EXAMINATION (CONTINUED)
BY MR. UELMEN:
Q_ Mr. Foote, is California Horse Racing Board
authorized by statute to promulgate its own regulations?
A_ Yes, it is.
Excerpts from Reporter’s Transcript 46.
Q_ Allright. Does that authority include the authority
to recognize what records will be official records of the Board?
A Yes, it does.
MR. MARKS: I object to that as calling for a conclusion
of the witness.
THE COURT: Overruled.
BY MR. UELMEN:
Q_ Now, in exercising this delegated authority has the
Horse Racing Board given any official recognition to the
records maintained by the Daily Racing Form as [261] official
records?
MR. MARKS: Objection, calls for a conclusion of this
witness and not authorized by his position with the Board.
THE COURT: Overruled.
THE WITNESS: Yes, they have.
MR. UELMEN: Yuur Honor, again | will move the
admission of these exhibits.
The Federal Business Records Act does not require
that the person compiling the records be on the payroll of
the organization that maintains the records. This is a
function that can be delegated by contract, as long as they
have the official sanction of the Horse Racing Board they
are official records of that body.
MR. MARKS: May I ask a couple more questions, your
Honor.
THE COURT: Certainly, Mr. Marks.
VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION
BY MR. MARKS:
Q What official regulation authorizes these chart
—~ ere
Excerpts from Reporter’s Transcript 47.
books as being the official chart books of the California
Horse Racing Board?
A I can’t think of any particular regulation which
says that the Daily Racing Form is the one and only [262]
chart book, except that all the conditions for a race are
promulgated upon past performances.
And the Board recognizes officially, by Board order,
that the Daily Racing Form is the only recognized authority
for this, except when the horse is foreign bred.
Q___— Do you have that Board order?
A I can certainly obtain it. I don’t have it with me,
no.
MR. MARKS: Could we, your Honor, defer a ruling,
if it becomes important as to the opinion - -
THE COURT: I don’t think so, Mr. Marks.
Any other questions?
MR. MARKS: Your Honor, I would state very briefly
now that to me this is like the purchasing of a novel from
a book store and saying that that is the authority upon
which we base our - -
THE COURT: You can draw a better analogy than
that, for heaven sakes.
MR. MARKS: Buying a newspaper and saying that
the charts in the daily newspaper are the official - -
THE COURT: How about the Congressional Record.
MR. MARKS: That, I understand, can be changed
if the congressmen want it changed.
THE COURT: All right. Any claim that these
charts are not trustworthy and accurate? [263]
MR. MARKS: Absolutely, your Honor.
THE COURT: Your evidence in that regard?
Excerpts from Reporter’s Transcript 48.
MR. MARKS: That the charts are a compilation - -
THE COURT: Your evidence, evidence that these charts
are not accurate and correct, are not trustworthy.
MR. MARKS: I have - -
THE COURT: Do you have any evidence to show that
these charts kept by the California Horse Racing Board and
obtained from Triangle Publications are not trustworthy?
MR. MARKS: Not at this time
THE COURT: All right.
MR. MARKS: Although I may have - -
THE COURT: All right. The motion will be overruled.
Exhibits 1-A, B, C, D, E, F, and G will be received in
evidence.
(Plaintiff's Exhibit 1-A through G for iden-
tification were received in evidence.)
MR. MARKS: May I have the motion to strike reserved?
THE COURT: Any time you can bring any evidence,
Mr. Marks, the Court will certainly permit you to.
MR. MARKS: Thank you.
THE COURT: But don’t bring any novels in. [264]
DIRECT EXAMINATION (CONTINUED)
BY MR. UELMEN:
Q May the copies of the twelfth race on September
25, 1968, contained in Exhibit 1-D be distributed to the jury?
THE COURT: Yes. Mr. Largen.
(Whereupon the exhibits were handed to the jurors.)
MR. MARKS: Your Honor, just briefly for the record
only, I would like to show that the objection also includes
the objection to the business records exception to the hear-
say rule, if that is the basis upon which these are admitted,
OS ee
Excerpts from Reporter’s Transcript 49.
which is a denial of confrontation of witnesses.
THE COURT: Yes. I think your objection clearly
shows that.
MR. MARKS: Yes.
[Page 420, line 18 - page 423, line 4]
MR. MARKS: Your Honor, on behalf of Mr. Garner
I would like to first offer a stipulation, your Honor.
It is stipulated between counsel, for the purpose of
my particular motion, that at the previous trial, prior to the
commencement of the trial, Mr. Garner, through his counsel,
made a motion for severance from Defendant Swank.
Said motion was opposed by the Government and [421]
said motion was denied by the Court.
Is that so stipulated?
MR. UELMEN: So stipulated.
MR. MARKS: On the basis of that action by the Govern-
ment, which prevented Mr. Garner from having access to the
testimony of Mr. Swank, through the use of the subpoena
powers or otherwise, Mr. Swank, for the record having
declined to testify in his own behalf, I ask that the Court
invoke its own supervisorial powers and deny the Government
the right to now call Mr. Swank.
THE COURT: You are going to have to educate me as
to your motion.
MR. MARKS: My motion - -
THE COURT: Because I don’t understand it.
MR. MARKS: My motion - -
Excerpts from Reporter’s Transcript 50.
THE COURT: Are you saying that because there wasn’t
a severance in another trial the Government can’t produce a
witness at this trial?
MR. MARKS: Cannot produce a witness which they,
through their own chicanery, if you want to use that word,
have denied Mr. Garner the right to the access of a witness.
Now, I will explain the proposition. Mr. Swank was a
co-defendant. He was an alleged co-conspirator at that trial.
He had an absolute right not to testify
Mr. Garner could not obtain the testimony of [422]
Mr. Swank - -
THE COURT: I am not talking about that trial. That
trial is a nonentity, isn’t it?
MR. MARKS: The Government, in its opposition to
the motion to sever - - if there had been a severance and
Mr. Garner could have probably secured the testimony of
Mr. Swank, that it was not to be used against him in any
other proceeding, so that Mr. Garner could have the oppor-
tunity of a defense.
THE COURT: Oh, all right. I understand your
motion now.
MR. MARKS: All right. Now, I say that the Govern-
ment is estopped by its own desire to prevent Mr. Garner
from having a witness at an earlier trial, from using this
immunity type of doctrine, which is statutorially author-
ized, to produce the witness at a later time against Mr.
Garner.
And since they produced the situation they cannot
benefit by it, and the Court, as I say, under its own
supervisorial powers and under just a question of due
process of law, and I would say under the combined doctrine
Excerpts from Reporter’s Transcript 51.
of Bruton and Green, they don’t have the right to call this
witness.
THE COURT: Mr. Uelmen. [423]
MR. UELMEN: I have to confess I don’t quite under-
stand Mr. Marks’ motion.
THE COURT: All right. The motion will be denied.
[Page 1201, line 8 - page 1209, line 18]
DIRECT EXAMINATION (of Roy Garner)
BY MR. MARKS:
Q Mr. Garner - - may the witness have Exhibit 19?
THE COURT: Mr. Murphy.
(The exhibit was placed before the witness. )
BY MR. MARKS:
Q_ Mr. Garner, do you file income tax records every
year?
A Ido.
Q Did you file one in - - is that for 1968?
A 1967.
Q You filed that in 1968, is that correct?
A Yes.
Q Now, before you filed that, signed and filed that
particular report with the Federal Government, did you have
any knowledge or understanding in your mind as to whether
or not those records were confidential or whether they cou!d
be used in court? [1202]
Excerpts from Reporter’s Transcript 52
A I believed them to be confidential. I had been
advised that they were by an attorney.
Q And is that the reason that you did file it?
A Yes.
MR. MARKS: Cross examine
THE COURT: Mr. Uelmen
CROSS EXAMINATION
BY MR. UELMEN:
Q Mr. Garner, what attorney advised you that they
were confidential?
A Larry Thorne.
Q When did he give you that advice?
A Larry Thorne has been my family attorney for
years. I couldn’t tell you the specific time, sometime
before I filed, the first time I filed showing gambling
income on an income tax return
Q Now, did Mr. Thorne tell you that they were
absolutely inviolable, that the confidentiality of them
could never be uncovered for any reason?
A That was his opinion.
MR. UELMEN: Nothing further.
THE COURT: Mr. Marks.
MR. MARKS: That is all I have.
THE COURT: You may step down, Mr. Garner.
(Witness excused.) [1203]
MR. MARKS: And in further objection to the
introduction of the records, your Honor, I would offer the
argument - - and I think it was presented by Mr. Saltzman
and Mr. Winsberg in the earlier case - - with respect to the
fact that apparently a presidential directive must be had
Excerpts from Reporter’s Transcript 53.
in order to have income tax records opened and divulged.
So I would object, your Honor, on the grounds |
believe it is the Haines, Grosso and Marquette cases, and
there is one later case about income tax records where the
Supreme Court - - if I recall it - - the Supreme Court said
they couldn’t use the privilege against self incrimination
to file false income tax reports, but the implication of
that case - - and I can’t remember the name of it - - but
the implication of that case certainly is that it could not
be used if the only cause of using the report was to
incriminate the person in some way for the fact of filing.
THE COURT: Mr. Uelmen.
MR. UELMEN: Your Honor, the confidentiality of
income tax returns and the circumstances under which
they can be disclosed is a matter of law promulgated by
Congress and promulgated by the Secretary of the Treasury
under statutes enacted by Congress.
If an individual’s erroneous belief as to what the law
is were held to create some privilege that did not normally
exist, of course any effort to regulate this con- [1204]
fidentiality by Congress would be frustrating. We could
have the situation of someone saying, somebody told me
that police officers can’t come into my apartment, therefore
any contraband that was discovered in my apartment should
be suppressed because I thought I had an absolute privilege
of secrecy in my apartment. That simply isn’t the law.
The law has spoken as to under what circumstances
these income tax returns can be divulged. And it is quite
clear it is not an absolute privilege of confidentiality.
Within the Internal Revenue Code there is authoriza-
tion for the Secretary of the Treasury to promulgate
Excerpts from Reporter’s Transcript 54.
regulations as to when income tax returns can be disclosed.
That regulation has been promulgated in Title 26 of the
Code of Federal Regulations, Section 458.204. There has
been full compliance with this provision of the Code of
Federal Regulations.
At the time of the Motion to Suppress the income tax
returns in the last trial we made the record, or the letter
requesting release of these returns a matter of record as an
exhibit in the case. And it indicates full compliance with
all of these statutes and regulations
THE COURT: What exhibit would that be, Mr
Murphy?
MR. UELMEN: I think Mr. Murphy will have the [1205]
answer to that.
THE COURT: Where would it be now, that exhibit?
MR. UELMEN: The exhibits have been retained in the
clerk’s office, so it would still be here, your Honor.
MR. MARKS: Your Honor.
THE COURT: Yes.
MR. MARKS: I have one observation. As I understand
the case - - and I am challenging the validity of the regulation
-- the Supreme Court, in my understanding, has said there
are times when the Government can impose or overcome
certain privileges where they can show a particularized need
for having the information.
The only need or use that the Government has to
reveal the contents of an otherwise confidential memoran-
dum in this case is the need to try and use it as evidence
against the defendant, which is not the type of need that
the Supreme Court was indicating
If the Government, in the course of function of its
Excerpts from Reporter’s Transcript 55.
business may have a need to disclose records for the purpose
of statistics, or bringing out some fact, but not, it can’t say
it has a need to convict a person by overcoming his privilege
against self incrimination, because this is compelled testimony.
The Government requires that a person file an income tax
return. And failure to do so [1206] is a crime.
THE COURT: All right.
We will take our recess now. Mr. Murphy, if you can
obtain that exhibit that was entered, introduced in the prior
trial, then Mr. Uelmen, if you and Mr. Marks can get together
with Mr. Stefanak concerning the telephone information con-
cerning Mr. Long - - and how many witnesses would you have,
Mr. Marks?
MR. MARKS: There would be four or five short wit-
nesses, your Honor. But none of them are here.
THE COURT: None are here?
MR. MARKS: Because of some miscalculations as to
the type of testimony and what was going to - -
THE COURT: All right. We can spend the rest of the
day settling instructions and maybe hearing the motions.
MR. MARKS: I do have a motion that I am thinking
about, your Honor.
THE COURT: All right. We will take a recess and then
when you are ready let Mr. Murphy know and we will resume
outside the presence of the jury, first of all.
(Short recess.)
THE CGURT: Mr. Marks.
(Whereupon the following proceedings were had in open
court but outside the presence and hearing of the jury:) [1207]
MR. MARKS: Are we here now with respect to Mr. Stef-
anak’s testimony, your Honor?
Excerpts from Reporter’s Transcript 56.
THE COURT: Mr. Stefanak and also the income tax
return, Mr. Marks.
MR. MARKS: Yes, sir.
I understand they cannot find the Exhibit 55, your
Honor.
I object to the introduction or receipt of the exhibit
for the reasons stated to the Court, the objections to the
Court.
THE COURT: Mr. Murphy handed me a Xerox copy
of a Fifth Circuit case and said that you gave it to him.
MR. MARKS: That is for my Motion for Judgment
of Acquittal, your Honor.
THE COURT: Well, that case says that Grimes, who was
the appellant, contends that the introduction - - this is on
Page 796 of 79 Fed. Reporter 2d, “Grimes, the appellant,
contends that the introduction of his 1960 income tax
return in which he stated his business was gambling violated
his Fifth Amendment rights. We believe this contention to
be without merit.”
MR. MARKS: I believe that case is before the Supreme
Court, your Honor, and the other ones I cited.
THE COURT: All right.
MR. MARKS: The case there was cited with par- [1208]
ticular respect to Count Two and the telephone calls.
THE COURT: All right.
MR. MARKS: Which is more in point.
THE COURT: All right. Mr. Uelmen.
MR. UELMEN: Your Honor, with respect to Exhibit 55,
I have been informed that - -
THE COURT: This is 55 of the first trial?
MR. UELMEN: Of the first trial; 1 have been informed
Excerpts from Reporter’s Transcript 57
that the clerk has misplaced this with a number of other
exhibits that were not admitted into evidence, but were
marked for identification in the course of the trial.
I have located the transcript reference, however, at
Page 2290 of the transcript of the first trial, February 18, 1970,
when the letter was marked and admitted and there was refer-
ence to the fact in the transcript that the letter indicated that
the Government had written to the Internal Revenue Service
in compliance with Section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code.
If the Court deems it necessary I can inquire of the
Internal Revenue Service whether they have the original of
the letter still on file. I am sure what was marked as an exhibit
was a carbon copy of the letter from our file.
The Supreme Court last addressed itself to the problem
of the admissibility of income tax returns for the purpose for
which we are offering them in the case of United [1209]
States v. Sullivan, almost 50 years ago.
THE COURT: I don’t think I need any argument on
the law, Mr. Uelmen.
MR. UELMEN: I just wanted to point out that even
after Grimes and Marquette the Court distinguished Sullivan
and indicated that was still the law.
THE COURT: The Court having presided at the previous
trial in which Exhibit No. 55 was received for the purpose
of laying a foundation for the introduction of the income
tax returns of Mr. Garner in that trial, the Court will take
judicial knowledge of all of the proceedings which took place
in the prior trial in that regard.
There is no contention, is there, Mr. Marks, that Exhibit
19 is not the tax returns of Mr. Garner?
MR. MARKS: No.
THE COURT: All right. The objection will be overruled.
Excerpts from Reporter’s Transcript 58.
19 will be received in evidence.
[Page 1365, line 9 - page 1366, line 12]
All right. We know Swank was getting the horses
from another source. We know that Mr. Garner was aware
of this arrangement between Mr. Swank and Mr. Lawler.
And we also know something else about Mr. Garner.
We know Mr. Garner was himself in the business of betting
and wagering. That is Mr. Garner’s business.
We know that because Exhibit 19 is in evidence. And
Exhibit 19, which you will see in the jury room, is income
tax return which Mr. Garner filed with the Federal govern-
ment for the years 1965, 1966 and ’67.
You will see from these tax returns that in 1965, for
example, Mr. Garner listed as his occupation on the tax
return “Professional Gambler,” self-employed; that he
reported a total income for that year of approximately
$8,200.00, of which $8,020.00 was derived from wagering
income.
You will see for the year 1966 that Mr. Garner [1366]
reported a total income of $22,000.00, all of which was
derived from wagering income.
We will note that in 1967 Mr. Garner declared an
income from wagering in excess of $25,000.00, reporting
a loss on his horse racing ventures, his ownership of race
horses, of approximately $12,500.00, and a total income
of $12,500.00.
So we know Mr. Garner himself was no stranger to the
Excerpts from Reporter’s Transcript 59
business of wagering and gambling.
Now, how do we go beyond this to show that Mr
Garner was the source from which Mr. Swank was getting
the horses he was betting?
eters 1
. *
a” . .
® dl sa * ef
f= |
"OQ 7 re ,
ALMWMIC > Meio fi wo Y..-
VINYOSI1 4 illeris > rr0wr c 34 5
ane WO “ORVINO oe ae Ragen ov Se. ‘PAPA ED
¢
‘ y
3
3
rf
(t9-01 “Aze) 990L MOOS - VW aN I
YY 4
uoT}0eg_SerINpeddld TeToeds . r al a
setup Butfoy ‘uoySuzsszeH “d 4 i . : 8
WALT : - §
o
: \. a
4 < 3
zoyoattg 20TzISta “gpTUUES °S “4 2 \ f
-£inseas], ayy JO Asne19eg 64) jo uor2eatp Ag -? By '
‘yaya aroge 3844) 2ea4 pur Aep ayy uo Ty, ,' |
-paxije aq 01 2d19J0 S142 JO [898 aU) pasned pue ‘puey OS AA AN 7
fu yes ounasay aaey | ‘AOBUSHM SSSNLIM NI | \ {
\
v
‘aotsso STUD UF \t uo
\.%
\\
l\
{ ;
i
cot pue 996T ‘L96T BitpUe sported STABXUY 1OJ
(m) 9TEQ-OF-29S PUB (H) Ls€e-7€-S9S groquny AzTInoeg TeFOOs
‘zaqurey Buemoy pue “qd koy Aq petty Urnzed XB] auoour TeNpyATpUl '
*s *n SO7OT WtOd JO satdoo }Oe1I00 pus emt> 51— pexeuue eur Ur A | I
SONIITEYD ‘FNOD TIVHS SINSSIUd GSZHL WOHM C | ox
o6t ‘Te Arenueg +0180 }
35D1ANRS BANNSASY IWNUALNI
INBWLYVdsaG AUunNsSvVvael
SCI PINUTL |
a >»
. TIOVIIVAY Ad09 1838 a enemenaneenneneeat ear emy Tar
= "OQ9 WIM YY OCS wey.
bo V2 ;
ALVSM ISD PAM LS2AMWIONN 820 BE PIGATOAM/ oi ‘
ge 3
, wwe ~~.
VINSOSNYD ‘OnWING eee
{S455 9 JALO1 ssappy ° j V8 Ajue jy VOAW UBHS pSmur 11) OG “AYO! Brnyaj 11) CUMPRUT)S 6 osmOd
ey verona = RRR AY ee 3 Tee fo or i ie
saree pyaL1you a Te Se eeeeiiae a aA So —, | “yy Res mry THs 3
Y /? “ore «4 £c Ss war 8), ay > {@ UOrpes 0) UF [8 VO Peteg b) UO)!)Ole;DaOp By ‘/eAPOre) VEY) I-yio wows Aa ny ” - pus sad duh >
SF 1) (242g Pus SBpapmouy Aw jo ve fou 7) pve “wee ers eh8 PUR Soprpays JurduOdwds2e s..pry su “WINYSE BiG) Pevrwee® BRGY | Jegs etj-ey | “Memliad po sonjyerad 1, oy ‘e
62 aque PL Npey | | 40 p-PuMjas 4y5208 Ypm “Spusy sJu..0y sal } OPAwiy ES wos YP, vey poeayqng CZ : >
: “yz} ~~" te, PoyewHsy BOG! | 0} PIYPas> yam NOK EZ OUH jO wUNOWY wz punjru 9
— omer waukedsoag 4 Jajua “(Q] uy) wey VEY) JIL De (TZ 9UN) Swusuiked j) 2 Pravin. &
: 2G? 4 apy aun ae inj Uy keg “ang Souejeg 1.qwa (91 dui) xe) Ley Soa) OVW (12 duy) Swowhed | ee Wes g
vy (OZ Puc ‘GL ‘Ul ‘ZT Sou pps) HIOL = TZ he
wv a a ~ oz ~ (peed © 58 POmol/e puawdediond 9961 emmiauid Sjuowded we) pojcu. Ws} (961 OZ 3
, He Jot | 6tez wx0y—auy Boy [ ) “OtTD wi0J—xe) auyosed [819p2) AemysQuON[) GT anon @
44 ' BI) (Sut jog aded a25—siahoydwa s0W 10 Omj) Piayyym ue) yD) 189K) Bt ' ke :
Mi | atl (a-M Sun0g Qoene) pioquwm 0 9UIOdU! jes 2994 104 ZT ~ :
1 (SI Puc “GPT ‘Cpt SdUH Ppe) av} CIOL OT _ P
SI Ti=F 10 €=9 Binpoirs) KEY WaIWhojwwiarpos gt | “HPD |
art (WUaWIDIE}S YEE) WPIII FUIUSoAUs JIA JOIN BUNNGWOII: Wor KEY QHT xeL
oot ai sion) ET SUIT DEAGAS) xe OSU, ep | = “MPA,
er (p oun ‘A ped “Z eed WOsj) s; p9ID CIOL ET _*:
71 (PT I-CTT Sour das ‘aNPIYS JjeY KE] 10 ‘OT vur) JS *9/Ge] Ke] JOUVo Woy) KEL Vy |
cs E E oO a PIT) “ZT SUy Uo re, sap (SUONDNZySuUr JO TT OJed VO BjNPaYDs Djes Ke} Bursm Ay yunowe
| SHY) UO wey at 4n0K aandi4) “auy sig) vo SeeEne ae "ATL Quy WHOM DTT QU 12-GNS PTT
0050 fn _ att ouos Aq ‘aaoqe * > OUI] UO SUONDUIIND JO BOQUUAU jL}D) Ay) iow Wow Tt) sajn > 3
ENE o_ Qit! coy? 6 OUH WOH ETT uy penans ait - 5
a Cen 2 wae -=-@ oa om 2
tee My “(Ajayesedas Buy pue pouseru y o0s¢) 000° TS OF Pau (Z) 40 ({) s2PUN YON Np|gG hoy omny
* fog t.4, ‘2. *r300 BAO ‘Y BU!) VO PI UIC? VONDiWIKDI Y9EI 10) OOTE Sid
ce orcv - ~ JETT, (uangos dpesedos Juny puc pousew jp OD1$) 002$(Z) HO “6 24 §O Usd.0d OF (1)
‘pO s99s2y VY 49PUD BIOU! 1 OOO'SS SF! G IU PUB ‘SUON NPP a71Way you Up NOA rT]
£1 uy “A ved ‘2 oved UUs) 1840} 49449 *‘SUONINPIP V7NL op NOAA OTT
CACRS OY TOME — — aaa — —ueo-— w
. ae f or “ZT auy uo xe} soy ‘p40 ‘3 ‘GQ “CTT SOU ISN JOU OG) = “SUONSINIysUI Wt $d/Qe) | aye) Woy
: >» oe ; Woy xe, nod Puy ‘O000'SF VE) $S9) Si G JU) PU SUOHINPIP SZHUdy pu Lp NOA 4 OT | TED PoE ny
) folevp tf (Z wun dp B veity LAGNS) verwou! jeYOE GD a pod 3
| ™ (g oun ‘ii ey “Z ased tU04j) DLUODU! OF SUdASHIPyY gQ_ ‘aa x
leié e277? 1m “a Stesp ee TT (G PUL G SdUH ppe) [e}O ZG, 2WOr! We w
TE. Fore a (g duy “Weg ‘Z 9JUd 1W0sj) DwWo DW ayIO ~-g “aaa ‘ta fi
a VONCUCIAKD YIP WC Z—M SUUGZ PIYyeNL UO u-rOys JOU 4) 3d)9 ‘Sy ‘Sduejes “SOHeEM awo0duy a
4
PUMP PAID uy
ry <° PIUHL]D SUONDWIKG IOL Bp Pit? JUSPUIDYP Ypiva (19) mOpIM TuAIUNS |) af
(¢ ouy “| yey % a%ed u:04)) ‘squapuad yp IYO JO LIMON QE Pioyasnor| jv PeoH PIOUIeEWUA CPT
e = — oe. gas coeseeeese AIHOL tonnes eeccccccccqccccesccessccocee: cocece ee * 9:04 oweU yssy 013 pue
ecoguceneediesdnennnsggocess-coseasanneseesssecsones -S/97 y }. fo nok DAOge Popiaosd adeds UI JaQWAY AjlNrOS jCIDOS (Siy) J9y 4d;Ua _j
YHA PIA OYM LIID|N(D JUBPUIDIP INOA jo sou: Cu ySsty CE | ‘ysnjas e 2uyy osye si asnods py “Ajayevedas Buyy pauiey 1 3
LY ae =) (J mM * * * asnods az (2wo2u! pey eUuo Ajuo yi VaAa) WIN}IG QUO! Buy, PIE a at
— O 2) MW * * * ppossnog ez aduig C) er
Pury JIADIOTG 4seINFdy = SuUoIdiUdN UNO, '2U0 AjUO HI91}I—SNCIS Durjty anon
Us yds QUO! ft ‘SBeepoe pre seAOpOwa Jue, Vid 6 ver - -
aS??? i Sims Stasppe pue sehOidwe gu rsard 20,
aH! hd . eid a ier 3 ell [| 42)U2 “Susnyas dere 12S OF pULOT 10 puro! OF YerCUaS uOy
woreensee $ omne.ag Dudley? ff wOKEDE BAB “pry auOw pp °(_,BUIES,, DIM “OAL (ee ES pe) Qf 20 WIT ION BMUd WO , 8 LLOUPPe pus sue moog ve, 9
PIED OS ras J2?L°5 VIPTYVODAC) On WIWTA) 4
age Cpanase pe1208 6 Fim s apes ait 210) 5 Pus “e240 Pod 40 uno “yy G
Mu r¢Vo,/ ‘fA AMO OI PSL
Z armenia renee 7 cen - >, (2yMOs jerry 10 pears $ pus J2QWAN) vieupse 3-H 3
, — « SSECIAEI SOS DAI 10 |) UIIMIY = CE AY g
| g
Sous Aysnra$ (€1908 smog eweu 180) (yiOq JO Syerprur OIPPIW PUL Saweu yoy OEM “YeMLar Puro! yy) ;eHwH Pus QweY wy
61° Buipue “{9u1 * Bu soQ seek wjpgeces 1eyi0 40
.. ASG lL, ers 2961 UE mawarca~t Arenwer woKout Or EE PAZOL] MOL DINO DEL WE it ne
a ¢ fsty ‘ “rR O29 ONUrAdY jeUsa}Uy “WU2.Upedsg AsNsersg ¥'1) a
, 4
(2
a ,
eo"
é>
CEACNRI N22
— . he oer a TT RE YT eerie?” ll
,
t,> - .
-
© .
_
| ial
> oe
‘ySt] Parnuway —aeny— (ocimuayio-
30 OdUCINSU Aq PdjesUd MUOd JOL) VIdKD JLPIYP PUP jd psy
"UOlpLHpeP Psey uLys 40 BIQUy Te)
Bsn Ou Op MOA y Ajuo as - SUONINPIP PaZusayy © /W We”
prs eye 8 bd th peg et ot Baris J5 iiss ° ‘ ° : . «£
a . J aul ‘ .
4° Wt 0un f oie 20) SLIGTUD Wik #| _] Ween | ow pitasesenray Wied 6
- ; > & .. * ere Uuli0 {) WPI4d wey UdidsI04 E * (9S0662 U0 pyrene) *D}2 ‘sucyd yuowssy
cocevelpecese smmenenrel @ 6 © + (BOE tUIO4) WPIUD JURUSOAY) Z “94 0} a howe purupluajivs Aq Syusiudey & *
eretee | coeeeeeee oer eeeeeeee e ojnpoud y 212 awosut yuaasay er eOe] cceeeesereeeeeerreer |! e ° ° . (juduieyeys 491j)0 10 Sotz
(Q ONPoYrS) WP syipoig f/f. ‘4 UO YICYC) O..vdad ssouisng dAoWWy €
FLOEOER la vit coy paleduopurony sayy Orpest || anes nom : oe ne anno z
aaah aaa oe ae —— — * Ou woe 00 yee wo) 4?
‘vl el yon ppe) oom vee at Qu) oded ‘Gg oi uy popnyout pr, Avd HHS. F
a * * gnGaUel II siu ie Alia —~ se 2°
CAE. ‘ovr Metl W / ee IG ...--cereseeeneenes , -| SUOIU! O} sjuowysnipy fT);
Scccccececes ecccccocccccocoscocsesess ecccce Soececcecs eccccece coccces cece se seccececeesccececeeooesseres 14 EDA CS 4 : 9 ou) 7 vid UO PUL dvi 190)
errr Tren rrrrrrr tt ttt | . (Z pue ‘9 'S ‘y ‘c ‘2 “1 $vul ppr) Wwidl v
wevseneeees * (suoNInsySut jo G 9¥ed 09s)—"suONINpap sNODURII>IN STTOA TS If * ewodu) SROOUE!|925/WU wore 4
= ————— sents Fey i801 = “ a puseapncusncethbusnnataseasasesecenneunnnnnnnssestahentesiNe
AUS A ry pqws 3! EER Ee
¢. sorrtetss/ oh * oo oon he” "CATH NANT POTIFOUDS
ee eeee es eeeeeees ceeeeeeterrerereee . Seer crocs sececceeseeesorossocscceooescoseeqeeoescose | ****** eoeere id (32:n0s pue eunjyeu oye}s) owo su SNODU})/ 22510
rrr rrr nr rrr rere Tr rr Tre r er ee eed Precis tet ee om - G anpays wune) 650) 10 awoouy wid) 9
PPrrreee ret ee ee Cees eeeeeteee Ce eeeeeree teen eereeeeree eeeee (a71Ww3}!) 4210 . (a GINPIYS yreqe) Ayedoud jo s 249 10 O25 ¢
rpcpur in sereeeeenenss + * * @BeBPOW OWOH—"ssUd0Kd suns Pe AAL C7 AA” * 42 Pnpayas Youle) $80) 40 ewoou) SSaujsng P
DLL L4/__ ttn DUM / ets ‘SOxe) 18IOL PT * (@ “"WOS YrUVe) “D}2 “sysNU 40 Sapeysa “Sd.ysia”
— Ayadosd + jcu0ssad “ped ‘Sayjpedos Pus sjuds “SuQinuUe pue $Udr0 IJ €
— cereeeecemeneers] @ 8 6 * * * BEYODUT 1290) PUL BIC)S ad p 4 ae ia *@u.oouy 3$940)U} were z
Pe . (suorona)suy jo $i oded aos) sajcs jesnuds . Ce. Ceerese: e6000% seseeseeoseres® Oeeereeeeeereereee ereetereeeeceree eeeeeees ses rereere oereere
ecocccel” *OOS So Seeeoesooolle . . . 7 auyjosed j@20) pue a1eIS PTTTTrTr TT tit tte PrreTTritit ttt te PerrrrrrrrrrrrrT Tritt
eoees. [vcecccoesererereceors i a a, & oe a1e)s9 jCO4—"sSaxey eecccceboceececeeccescce ce cceeseeeseeseesesessesescocosess eccoeeseoosesoosceseoososs co sesesososoosoeS
YB 7 - saaGmuDy 167 WUSGEAAGH COT—ET BOS “Y ¢ e sesunbumbessneninananenin AN vn” “y wn ry, SOV
Tir ‘Oo. seun ppt) suaH Ing \Uo? Jeet aan eamennnt uted eva wae xe} is ew aes 40y0
¢ vd hes bE Sookuen 20)" premamenesanmnanneces mites sconvecennenscoeneecnstiianias
(ase yo yo? CSR adhd wdi; soaodued Z2f
EE “| + ay0.y stuoy Ydms yo 1e70) 4dyUQ “(uoways | saeeienneetemeninetnasteeneaammemmemniiail natenreneepa
PIN. ID shy SUOJIMISU] GIS) SOD WEY) IDYIC) TT | -----eveeevveeeeeneennnnnerennennnrnnrenenes —— ———— eueocennensvecenenenanesecestes
eoeee so ceccecccessoresoe: ° > . e . suojynqisju0> yse> j}0L ot 0066000000 c0s ce eecccees 1004s 050005 00SSSS000 100 500s 000804 0s 6 9O9S9SSSSEOSOOSOSOOOSOS S SOSOOEDSO OSS SOOOOD
eccecccccoceceoocce OOOOOOs 6 + 60 600600000005 SSSOSSSSs 66000 000+ 060000 000000000050 0+ 005 5080s ee Coeereooese "suoiun ypaid pue “90888 ueo} pue sBujaes wo. sduiuse3
ecccceccces eccccece e®eccccccce eeccccescccceceee ecccceccece SOs cecccccecesoocooccosseses oc veeeccceccocoe (mojaq syunowe pue siohked ¥51)) ySQs2;U4
ee ee er. ee eee Ad pe reer eeee 4 : > > : a (0192 UeY) S52) you
suena nenennsenneneennnnenestnatianmmanapenenneaenenmnnpemmnnmmnmnmemmmmmmenmannat —o] ui] $59) @T OUN!) SPUDPIAIP 21GeKeL JT
OOo OO+ COS SOOO SOOS ESS OO SOs 6 OOS FOSS EEESESHOTSOOSSOSSSESESSSE SS SOHO SEO SSEOSOOSOS SOS O® wT TTTIT Tee ' > ° . . (pt puc ‘OI ‘al Soul ppe) jeyo, or
seereee PPPrrrrT Tre rrret re. Le ee ee eed “*e (orm wo) : — = - <r (suorjanaysur jo 9 adad aas)
‘219 ‘suapu® Aouow ‘542949 Supmou—yse9—wonngiweg |f “pi, gt COMES 8190801008 OF
-—— Se ee : , ee ss IEE WA eeeee+ [eoeeresceeseerseteeee .
ee 929 _Jj< : Pye sou ped yeion 6\- “oye °”. yy! (svoyaniysur Og 290d 998)
- ¢ why! Y L $: icy ae) 9
| + (oer a td Fett a (whi? PL inawe 3 |Z “My fo Gif SLONNQUISIP Wed jade) 3E
. . . * gos ibe 6 duly jo oF sw Z [7 "ov" “dp 4 ‘ VA ee a eoecerscececes ‘(suonannysut 295) vorsnj 19 at
coececes oe eee cece seeeceeeceee e . . . ° . (Ss pue py Sour) ppe) jeVOL 9 fei oh Meh Ade Ne ‘ e - o . 2 . er our 84
_—_— ; . . . (Tf duly uo aq Npop yOu aue3 je> e 9000000eeee oceee - 0000600 60s es coceeeree + s0ees+ 6008s
3 hC! 4Pdits JO, SWAMI DULINSUI JO BIUe!CqG eetineeeennatennetin ——— ———
‘3 SPNjUI) SUSUSIAD [CJUIP ‘jEWPIUs 49143O &
ssieieeattiaeeteeninel tous? aby) $894 YOu) Z 9uN wos E OUN IENQNS Bl sctiaiemmasinseseninsinmamnionie
— . e . e ° T aaed 6 our yo %T yoy € 060eeeeeneeeehGheeksSG0S 00s eoSs 6eRSSSSSSESESSSDSS COSSSS* - COS SSEHOSNSSNSS CESSENS 1 C+ 9608 ececce
ibampmned + + © g8nap pue ourrpous JO 9809 LIOL Z a
* * 9989 yeo1potu soy SwAHWOId QDUCINS aa . ey
“ui jo (csi¢ Uerj§ VIOIU JOU yoy) peu 2ugQ t ce ccoceeccceceosscses coeseeecceeceseseescoeseeeeseoecesessscesesescosesses (Ayyurof
10 ‘dpm “pucgsny Aq Ploy yI0jS 10) ‘() “CM) “(H) @jum—tyunowe pua
Sivhid JSH) HIOPS UO SUOHPIQUISIP 19\,j0 PUB SpuIsPAIP $4049 4
‘2)9 'SOBCMURY) 494JOSOIINOS WOMOWOIU] |i ‘|
eae, an rae
rr te) a ee ee eee eee
Seeee eee eee eeeereeee Lew ewee
Wwapurd.p 3.4 W.. O08 S/001 | [ev0u 40 ONE 10
bMS Ore "PIE? Swope etep sy bu vst O44 5 8
PS 65 ep dew og Pee ee POA ewe te | .p.tsep e 1p)
qe oun ‘T cued UL PUL Vedy 4dUZ
or oge pais, >i vpeedop te) saquunu wes e
0. 10 .@., Oe eed Buy
“ep pap be brea HE Oued
Och why Oa, bebe pe:
+) | @ryswoneyey (9) (oprp eure yoenie Depeau oF erate ero FI? taewl?
Z BeurmL stl O1Ol wey
T Obed ‘YE Buty UO Pow) <)> spe epucdep 105 Ajuy Gyopduiog gp dor gy —
TTAVIVAY 4409 1939 * : cgee |
a oe = ppb neiinnncimnendceo ivisbancamsrcneannaaeals
noseeeebe a Ee se ol ee
epececcoccuncnenensessccescces _ L. YI K IT a cqueteeses.
_ ae ar - +) ae “SWITF BEERR™ mecmans
ape senvesssorennnvannennnnecssessnnsnssetnneseseessssssessneessfseeercerssees-ff ccsessesceressrovecrne” secccccg. “a RUV MoOA7 ING nose
| OORT he PPE RELL VU Pg GSA “es ‘ow ; spo7-s sabnbeianeiein x Uy 0%, Puy 2 a
; y ey —s _ Seeerdey _ on out weeny coyeneetag Tr
| 7 SZ QNV ‘pI ‘Zt ‘9 S3NI1 40 NOILWNVIUX9 “Too BINGINDS.
rd / fp rr e Cr } RE. * yeun "weg “2 oSed
‘OPOT W104 VO pus ‘7 euy ‘¢-5 PINPAYIS Ut ‘avay saQUZ “(OT euy Wd) QZ OU) 398139NS) (680) 40) yyQud yoy ‘
IP|e#ES 9 Athy: " " * * GF yBnowys TT souy yo jojo, 9
' ‘ = = = SS ao “(1D @Npeyss u wejdxv) sasuedxa SSIUISNG 10MIO ¢
, * QIMpeyrs yrene) “He “saquiy “syam sed Pus YO “S@uIW JO VONaWag »,
Se ys ene * (uewavers yreue) AUodord ssoursna ;9 $0880) ¢.
sURUEeEUEEUDemneMesenentateneem S92)K98 40 S9I0s wos Buse 8199p peg 2,
inci . * SSOUPI}Va9pU} SSoUISNG UO ysaudqU) Jy
ee * (suOn2nu;8u) e\e,eG08 #28—e18ys sMOA Vey) 491/99) “2y8 “suRld Wewerney Oc
scnenenanmnshanscenesenstesssensennnens ’ os be oes 8 * Quawajers ysene) vone 6
cmnanenetemmapneccocesseunnecncesneans Bankes a a wr a a * suisse) gy
= . * $89) [PUOISSej;010 Pus jeBay ¢7
ie i ok te Oe ee tele ee * e@2ueunsuy of
panaqueceneagineesccuenemnneanneaneesned * (18104 0) pied Aue apnj>xa) ¥ @ul! UO Papn/ru! Jou za8em pre seuees 61
coneqocenaqeunnsecocesnesennnasnances a . © @=6.6 2 <b a ‘(I-93 a%NPIyrs Up UIe}dx9) wyedoy 9,
™ . * Auadeud ssoursng uo quay ey
a xs € 7 " "8 * * (f=2 @Inpayrs uy weidxa) Ayadoud SSQUIENG PUB SS2UIENG 1.0 Saxe) zt
“Op DeEey oremes - e. 8 8 6 € 8S Ore & Sb -O Le (2-9 eINpayrs wy Uye;dxa) VONTISIIdGeQ TT
SNOILINGIG SS3INISNg YIHLO
OO ACE LY = «Oe 2 * 6S 6 ee be oe he a (T 24H Wor) § uy 328499) yyoLd ssouy ut
Do espn Oe 2 S72 2S + £6.86). & Bea ima ( euy wo 8 au }e2)QN8) pios s8poo)} 40 ye9
°
SS SSz Penne @ 8 6'646 8 4% & Se a * 4894 S1Y) JO Pua Ye Acpuaan 7
| bo este teeeee 2. ££ .2°C 6.16 2 as oe oa * 9 YSno1y) Z souH jo pej0, L
6-6 6:o & ees Be "(1D enpr; 'S UV! upeydna) sjso9 0 9
° a * Sauddns pue jeurjeyy .
* * Giessn0k 0) pred Aseyes epnjouy jou OP) soge; 70 80D gp
“OO Rs 5 ° SO +8 OPO CCOO CO E+ Cert eeeteree seer eees ees cee $ asn jQudsuad 405 SSouIsNg wos) UMeUDYIIA
sway kue it) 3s09 ssa Pe eee ee ee ee $ peseyoind OS PUB duayy £
COCOROS CPOE SOSO SOOO: + Sere Cec eseReceece
7. Fee Oye. 3 -@.S.'S OYE e Be ow 2s " (VOQGuedxa YreQe
AsOwwanuy Buisoj> $109 yse; wos yuasayp ji) seod 19 Burwu,Baq ye Ao}. sauy
00'2 no*9R S saree pe newnss £ ROD H si ewes pe sD
TPF ERSHHISING SiG) UMD HOA pry COG T UF SujUOW Auwul Mone 9
ON!) SAI acectr JO PUS 9u) We SSdUISNG SiQy UMO NOK PON
‘On T) sa, X 40 @ur) UO pajyeripur *-ay8 “wmo} ‘Ard ay) yO SIULPUND 9Y) Liijiim P@}@20) SSduUISNg suit OD
‘ON A S9A (1) £2961 wi sdyend Ave 40} SSQUISNG S14) 10) PIIY “THE Woy “UUNjay FOL (249P94 A\3VEND $ s940;dwi} VE ee |
} (apo. giz) ‘sayio C) (¢) yenzo0e 1 (2) ‘yse2 x) (1) :Buqunoooe jo POYIIUI Bsr pu; g
eee ie SS “SS Cts / * owes, 43}U9 051M 91;)0 ‘aaoge wos jus. ayep rT SSauppe $$9.,3ng a
© AQWON YONeIYynUap) Johojdw, > S2IDWwUIN HOvlg * CWeU SsaLisng g
C298 | daapyony - Bursnyrepn erw ' eBay - sarvasas "228904 —aCsa}0ym ‘Biemriey—jrepes 2/0 ves® 104) (SUOMI S)8Lede8 ea)
-—,— > ee Ge ccue >
JOOS ONGID 7) LS INOW Tp PSE UPR IOD V8 OS
OPOT W104 Tt ORed wo UMOUS FE SSO1DPY pus Owen
OVOL 6104 “YWaNjus XU4 QUID IY IVA VO} BNPIYyIs sip ydeuy
(COVOT Wu04) E-9 BINPIY>g UO xe) juLUAO/dwI2-s98 AyLIND98 [01908 ayNdwWO>) pooanedag tome =t 84
y r Ase '
Q) ain SuhpssOpusidoug 9j0S) “(orot
| ' y 0)
SOOT M04 UO Sy Ysnw “sya "SO4N|UIA nol *Sdijssdujpeg —
(oror wel)
WOISSOJOAc] 10 Sows] WA, (SSO 20) B04 21 ory
“EAN
ad
| wiapllaanadeiee : — v
“
TAVWVAY 1409 1939 fe
ee ee
_ — $ UOPUNaP 405 *D aN 2S 10) SUONDNsjSU! a}esedIS Bg
, be . —_— canenennnmnentnamennnnenenmapumnmtiganteit "000'OT$ VeUI SSI) Sp “T @s.d “ZZ GUN SNIP BDUENOWWe
ES v qUNOIIE Bsuddxe 4NOK jr 4j921NOA 40) 20 “OOO'OTS VEU
- - seneeenesennensnsennueccumecgneannnsennecess® $$] $1 JuNOWE paUIquIc> a4) WOM 20) BDA0}dWa KUL
mean veseassensesueeenecnussnsenegnnecsnessnentes 40) PaWaNS aq JOU PI@U VONLWOJU! YY “7EAIMOHK
-_ - 1 “| ‘saBem Pue souejes J9y) 0} POPpe OG YsNW So2U8
Tt de Sree) : . ; 10u"O -MO}/@ JUNCIZE Jsuadxa ‘saa{o\dwa pred ysoaydjy ary
Lececegpectihtp catibsadiinn ay} Suruw9j9p uy “SookojJwa pred ysaysjy day
eS Sue om nok pue j28uN0k 0} Prkovs YM VONeUUOJUI 42;UZ
t/(¥ NOLLWAYONI 1NNOIOV 3SN3UX3
os 00/7 ; OS O0e/]° waoz
Ore seess seer eeeetees «+se8ere oo + coc cceceses perspec | ar eeseere Os . | SOs eeeces+sorececeseceees« Pocceccecesesesoosooeseess . qnecen o++«e0eercee) cI-<9 2 12-29
Re. ty : 2 201g say 090 T
eyeg (Aj 2048) 280 alt panes o- MHIER pape erveieg Burwyj20Q our) dens
NOILVIDTUdIG JO AYNVIVAS
ceseonr = . “TT @uy 'T Jed Lo Pee 8194 49,U}-—-22-4.09 F
= Ie ¢ + 2. ae oe © - 6 D BINPaIYy®S Ul es2yMOS!e@ POWIE|> LONCcesdap jO JUMOWY ‘S59) ¢
eC. soe 7 . . . . 7 . . . . . . . . . b: . . . . . [oo C70 5] . . . . . . $,8)04 z
eoeee - >) VE WS Tsay BOWS OM = 069 F "FOL DIOR GF)
cececoecoceces sco Perret ritt itt tt tttt tte Yoo 00, — . Se 0ceeeces 00000000000 0eeeeeeceane
PURE: CANN: RRA + \atelated J , .J. aaa
om OS COE | WEE | IE |S ead, | B61 7 |" 0 F97TS 39?
00 006 | hé| 7S |e RoE gS "9 os) 00 DOL | “D¥ZHIV. £45
° '
< (MO)2Q Swap! YU! @PNj2uU) JOU OP) VONeIaJGIP 480A 4S4y [PUO!P/PPs [BOL F
. “7 ye . ial . e ‘
wctete, [ise TET) mente, | diaames | estes | smegee | samanemnee
yn 304 ( pousw 9 ¥0.ye.20180Q § ayo dsyer 10689 “bw Aber yasy f ace ows 100d Seay
: ' i
.
eoorr
-2nysul oyeuedas jO ydes3esed yse) 9as
sseveroseees pany Avy} 10M O19yM ,,‘S0A,, 1 “ON EM) SIA 0
) {£961 280A sepudjer 9yy 20f {HOT 40 GEO PUw GOT SUUVOY Buny 10) D/Qay MOA diy Z
‘uoneuesdxa yrene,."S®A..j ONNSD SIA 0
(D2 SINPIYIgG JO) SUH
{S@UOUIAY Buisojd
PUe Bujwddo dy} USIMjIIG SUOWENICA 40 ‘S}SOD ‘SONQULND BujUnwidjyp pO sQUVEW vyy UF JJUeYy? sertQULSYyNS AUs GIy) SEA T
NOLLVWUOINI WNOILIGGV
$aodhojdwa 10 jjasunod Aq asa wey 49410)
OND sn
gSDuNaow SsoUISMG 40 SUONUSAUOD Ye SdI/UIe) ,SvvAo;d
“ww 4NOA JO Apnuey JNA JO SUdGQiuvW JO BIVEPUd)je OYL W
ON |) SIA 1D (SMpEYS [QAe2) SS¥UISAG UI Sym
(Sours sy)
JO SIDQUISW 4O “SVVAOIGLUWID “SIVWIOISND Jnod ‘nod Aq pusn
tem won “f) Buyjowp sayjyo so ‘C) wowpede |} ans
JO Wood j2}OY EC JO UiySsdUMO 4O ‘“AuNjUaI ‘Bursedy ayl J
onm™m] su
hed voresea vey} 424)0)
(-Z-m W404 UO PIpOdas
gSoypwey 4194) JO JOQuUIQW JO
SIdAOjTWa JO “Apes INCA JO S4BQWIW JO NOA 404 SUOI/EIBA
UIYW S9xXOQ B/QeMIdde ¥29y3 ,,"S3A., 8} YONSEND Ave 0} JaMsUe ji) °4
ON LU
SIAC ( se sursng jedisuud anvud sum
Ayiidey 2y) JO UONBsLJo VYy DIDYM URYY 42430)
* Ayypdey septs 42YO 40
* youd 40 yeog aunsead
iO °
‘oO . .
‘oO . .
‘DO . .
‘oO . .
‘Go . .
Ayadoid pos
dwed 3unusy
* uuuey 20 Yue: Buly.om
* a3po; Bununy y fF
(uoRsand yey)
YM PI}2e2UUOD SaSUadxe 40, VOH}DNPIP e wit)> Not Pig
.. WUNOIDE BSudd4d,, 50
—_-
“S9IIIMCUW PosOYINE s@yjIO 104 BuIPEdY PUOIWS OY) PUB EI[-G9 PUC [Z—-Z9 SOINDIWs,4 ONUVSADY J9PUN VONB2dIGIP 40) Bi. PRDY ISsyy By) 250 seadie $4u)
“$24 PI20Id SNVIANs SSBY) OF JOU PIDIOYING $924) 210 BuiSM SMQwO? OF YHIM GYM SIDAMI. 4) Y Vy) 10) SB aM BY ET-GP pee
1Z-Z} S24) pO2O1y BMUGAVY UF PaT)\J28IP SasnpI220ud JANesjS;UIWPE PLB SaLyopind SAreusaye 9yp Bursn ssaheane; sy pauB\sop 8) ejnp-<>4 sive
“PCIy BIQNOP Bou
Tt 3NIT NO GIWIVID NOMLVIDIUdIO UGI NOILINGIG 40 WN
OLLVNVIdX2 “2-0 FICHE
-_--—*
Z sted
ey: a itl
- 4
OF Oreos Orvwa
s
2961 Sel iati yi
"G1 Asenuel yo se pred pasopisuos aq NEUE D2ueEq Yons ‘e061 tt "8961 ‘C1 Avenurf ays soy yy suey *z aut] WO a>.Ue;eq Yrs anand
' Asvnuef Ay INP RED JO QouNrpeny oy) pred Pur Uanjod snod pay nod i “openg ne - wel ed JO QoOUE EN wt A : . ‘ does 4Q pony sworn
i ‘puoueted Woes 20) YO IAs MEISE FO MoUS Ju UIE yeaa ey we ps Jo ooueyeey ot PUL “Bug “TE Aue val Aq pay su.
5 Susurpersut Usd © 30J JusuiAed dU0 vey) ‘waous sprut NOL jt e WANIE sHON FE PyoyIM spenqor UY gt p 24) UO pred sy Pulppoy
4 “VU otUTr ysis yaou “Yin yons 4 apriethod pug p2ssndo Bue ypeopypytan yoy uo Sliup “4
24) Wuleky wWpos> & se pondde oF PIMOS SyuOWAedJIpUN sod Wel Ess NOK YUN ep MIHPLISUE Posnibes Yous uo pied poops
. N® JO S6yv49 WY ¢ 2uYy UY TU AUTEN Ue yO jun AL ono Auy;: “40d ag Avi avs JY) BuLINp py MUM deb sya yo dav penbs uy ,
3 ‘ $f °.* *'* + * + + = agtunpsosze Ez suH Ose0190) 20 Ze Yur} WSeIIUI PLE , OBswYyD jE) py.,
' $8 UjBivws W0}}0q ey) UI JUNOWE SIG) MOyS “UsNjos AW} WA po | wSed YO “Cit Meg “9 Buy VO Urcys 4 UCI} NySUy
: j CARD 49 sotruNU Oy) 40; ‘TH Meg ‘E vuy Uo UMOYs Junowe v4) UO sev 400 JUdd/0d 9) OBsey> iwsOpppy Z due
' " * s0ts82 1 49A@YIM “296T “ST “udy 10 quewAed 9 ©WP OF “YIGT ‘ST “uor wos Shep jo swQunn g >
$}° ° * * * * <"Suonduiaxe pue sous £961 Buysn ‘auoruj 9961 uo paseg nei —z LOrj Joan } WOM suy
‘ $ et ie = a ie . “-. Ta ee . . . . . * wanjeos 996I vo umMoys i—T bu esag b P dus
= iA AA Mi Hh I ae (Z Suy S84) | Ou) Key pay 9 Jo Wwe Leon E a
| 5 SS SS 8 BOGE “ST “wer Aq ‘poppers 40 pwd syunowe puv 2961 Bujap PIPYUIM SjunwMy Z Q Uo INSU)
i
ceoscnceccosecocs Po ae? ae ‘SI “Yet UO enp wunewe Wau 24)) | Med “p aur) UO UMOYsS . UNOWe oul seu aug
Pied anp xe) Puy paiy $1 UuMja1 AMOK 41 WLIO) $14) O]1) OF AUBSSv \0U JOU By ‘NIVIYIHSII ONY SuaWuYd UOI— TN luv
ee EEE
; 4 ec GE $| * ABurps0r28 EZ OUH wSess20p 49 ZZ OUi] Preedu! pew ,,aHCYD jeuONIppy,, sv L.sseu
'
WOWOG OY} UL] JUNCUS $143 MOYS ‘WINJO) av} BWI) INOA 40 “| ~5ed UG “PT @UN UO syuNoWE jo jej)0) $I
' “~ =e ™ * $ : $ ‘1 itis f |
ice‘? %O¢/ TOPs Shep JO sequinu oy) 10) 11 9uy) UO junoure
ES Pee ve [eee ars eenrnef aoe none h 19 WOM 9) OBveyr ieLon->PY wt | 4 WORSRISHY
416 e/3P sos 99F * @AOQH Z] UH} LO UMOYS OVP Oy) OF vow 998 ,,‘a3ey>
| ! ; “HPi>4! $0 BOP ONP Woy Asp jo J9QON OT jeuoryippa,, ous
om s 3 ag “S55 = 3335 ae ese eS 8 42j100 9) sano andy % MO}
; / / ” / a ad “WIWM "BOET ‘ST dy 40 wuawAes jo *<O 2I
2 2 3 ~ $ - va - Z 2 ¢ “pe $F eo 3 < cZe3ws ; - a" . 7 a . " . " . - in ‘aa
| § eu} Woy) wowed, jo Junowy TT
eT eee ; $ $ $ a UONdeorg oI
i e
: (1c Sny (1¢ 41M um (it “*_ MM
Sova st] EMO set 10 S606 | F werd xen 10 So8 | T ven am ye Hos
$ $ $ ‘€ VOnderry 6
t
@woru ' ' @woru UOrINSUY
a ee a an i mor =. nae Oe tos w 03.6y9
$s $ $ ¢ ++ *OOCCCCO+ SOs see eeessseeceseen ¢ sudijdwaxa pue $ajes J2LOnippe,,
£961 “@WO2%M 9961 UO pasca xey OY} Plor yoit.a
‘Z uO. deo : ,
_™m on p oor TH Fur 79 %EL mei Sut 1° GOS m om fo %S2 de “eo Sud) Jss09
ie: Ce
$ $ r $ . . . © 00 -seererrcesesoseeceesosesccces ¢ » 4 9961
wh 9961 0 oot | Mm soct %5L | mM 9961 0 KOS | HH g96I J0 %Ez 5 CRetesay 4
3 r $ $| - * Pove21pur orep qwaujeysu; ou ydnosyy
T “Wer wos) Piauutim 40 ped yunoWwe je}04 g
i od 4EC a (1 Sun $589) @ du) Jusuded
“4900 10 (p Ouy Ssay T Sui) quewA, tapun S
£ Guy pue Z uy jo joyoy
7 * * g \ueUNe}SUI Snood Jo JUaWAedIIAQ ¢ ons
et Se poanaapnidnstniasint oan Sr , uvorjsns
. none gf eS pis nero @ vorjsnsysuy
-ve=— *‘POH8d Y28e 40) e}eWsSa UO Pied Syundwy Z O65 “just
“A2diapun snk
oO ee: eee *(g vwonrnaysuy a.n3i} 0} Mo
. LEC 29S) “SUNOCO? d)edosdde Ul Virwss seus so ul
Pew 160A OY) 40) PauiNbas SPUOW je jo. JO saq
“tune wy AQ "| Meg “y @uy UO yunoue eping ft
gcroec §| Cr tee so ¥etewe ¢
7
a! 6EC *] Ce4eOe ! “bE @
C2st “St wer | coer ‘st “dus | coer “St eunp | zo6t Gy dy
+ Mel Sug 4O S.j0g eng
(i:1 HEY 3A) UOWII0yS14 pue siouNeg) NOWYIHSH OV SYIWUY4 1499X9 SIVACIAIONI T1V HOI" Luvd
O/z Sé —- es " * * (96%299 asin ue.uwseysy PLP Ss9usi8j) 909 Au Lon dnynus € Ou HO Jurewy p
ye +) ra 7 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (z duly $Sa; T eur) Pasinipe ta rel c
{ae ae Soe £6 8 8 @ a 6 Oe &. ols SET P U0 | WON L9G UI pO Bujjeduqn pue 2 GSES 404 PIWIG!D )pesd avy Zz
9 6°96) 7% a 6, ieee JO 8 Ou) 10 ‘OpOL W104 JO | 98d “97 BUH UO VMOGS JUNOWY 4OUI) HIE Loe
— -—— - ee ee
_Cy vonsnisuy 995) SWAUIAIGI VIV UOT=1 iy)
CSD jE 29S BUD WUT) ~ 4) PMOBZY 1) LS Lo mY IN 77 «) SAON
F SN Aitanceg 181209 OPO! 4104 UO Umos $4 Ssesppe pus aneNy
. (VOPOE 104 40 OPOT Moy Yim oy) © 4 4) ; OHAIOS 940K p 1 nosey
) <é {: " WOWPEl4g Mineees SQ
| “elo SICH Ag. .vay Acy Mog OL10915) yyy 08
Poycuiysy jo wouAedsop ia) Of be. Cfurty _— () WA
— ee a © a ae rr
—
mre i rrr ee ere re ce eee ’ _
a ®
*
eS
TIVIVAY Ad09 1839
gee (8
. * a
aD. comm
‘ : "OD SWHO4 INa9N
on
tye o Vs, 4('ivuuay 4) "2 dew Gteea NOTLOIOUUY Ivio’ {eo SLs BAViu @ SNOMLAULY Be
-— |
wd AIS SO 4 (44V4i5) °C SHOW Steen NOL INGLY Wwiods YNOMLONUINEINOD ”"
—— ~~ —_— - —e- —— ee ee - —--- - i ee a |
IO) CE~ SOO UNWI FOGIW Bivig Wviwsn els 4 IVNNG4s = SNOTANUIwANe
(QM dv tay HDS) P4ENIEOK LtAVEL Woy iy -
ow ef SOVOINVITNZISIW JIwWNG034 vida
‘*- _—_— Se ee
— —
.
a, 1
(Q3H OWLav 3WWG3HIS) Sasson AL IWwNSV>D
S004 JIWWS f ri
See —_¢ b-
: AS 3n5D
ANNA ONY SWUO4IND SwiOSee | | SALINA INOS
4 1 va
| (Q3NOVSLY BINGINDS) ANOWwivl OO FZ 6 S410 40, sw
- *—=—_ -_— ee ee -—— ee
OO. Te NONLVEWd 3h NUNLIY XWL 3iWOoN] ‘ wh
SNOl4u1uSQNS UNV S3NG ‘GOonW anosuiT . as
ol) 0A oe S434 *O@ 1180430 aavs| OO 007 | s
——- 4 vy -_-— *— = ~~ ee -_——— — _-_ ee ee —- . ss an
AK Ay SNOILDSNGIG SNO3INV1N3E9SIN Wet usage SNOI LNG;
we yk - , eae = ——— 7" * =" = ° 2°. @¢ — =. s4 By 2 “OPO Gime esen
4: L646 AS3UI4ANI Wvio4’ atu ) 43) re, 929 SNOILINGIO AVOWL
: — CS / 14606" a. 0058 aN tins:
_—— <—- - ee - ee . 2 > ~~ ~y “- ©
CeO oOre Waoa ‘ans PILE
a -—- oe ec | —_ —— — - —_—_—_— _—— — ee —— <b — =~ ’ te “. “
Z ad ft ne SOE Nesotoy wae
At 2°04 a
- — —s ’ a > oo . ~
! Pw J 07 21 eJt SLNIWUSUNOINI ge ON
es -- —_—- — = qa e aed ow — ee ee -—-_ errr eee eee
A4gos SISNIUX4 WVDIO IW
_— . a _—- ll ‘
: | (943 ‘'S4USSW7D ‘GW.
— eed, Dee re i
OA Wuwawaua "CIW HOY
lie .
i. ee SASL OME F; 1677 AY tt a7, alae
ISES RS | Dw off CVO =O >} sv2) 200M MUA “pa
“©1488 A3IL9NGaUu LON’ 3%
oe ee oo
S iONY
& : ioemae stone $e 1saua.Lni] | —— fez ROE | 0 OI MY TUS Now
AYES ae oS PA// $3Xv4 Wilk ’
] ; | = ;
are ee ee : . meee « _— _ — —
nA)
Pair siaekce 3 08°C Ol 7% VIX MN IC DYIVS
——_— —... . = -- _ ———? —- -o ce ——— ...... - oo -. comme
i—| 7 we SRG eer lees: Ger ee
y S sorta ee — _——¢ —_ --- — ——— eT SL LS ee ee es
—+—— a GES be sce a ic) |) pa i OW HPS
, — eee ee ne 1. foe ae ae’
OOD OTF. 090 °9/ PIP xv. anriosvo POA Ou (OTM 70 y
xxl mex ICE) Sem Pom x¥4 BWooNt 3ivis| — | ~~ ON46 Il" Ow & WIAA
COBE/ DOEe7 —_ ee SPQ 820
7 _ aDNVNSN) ALTvsIa wiviel ~~ Sele —Te6 PYOAIVE A 9
ya adag ISN (AA VA UIVISS Ivan SUSILN 19 Guv un
OO SO als a — 07-6 p¥wE Astadouu Iwosuaal | 96 STs istdeaw Sue's 00 4
a § ee, } ee tas” en ee AP 4 7 SSOND ‘ray 494 7 .
ae Se Sete: Le ad id on BANISIGIW UND &
Javas | avuaoas] __”s«BBVA) d0ece | sensese™ ~ SASNIdXA AV)
’ 4 rae om Q370N3 UVIAA 200VKYWL
EPL CE] &/
SROMIAGIG 40 VAUI9s a“
en
VI eHNOs INDIO’;
19v ‘ON,
y eo ee
i
=
|
'
: =
rere a =] 4 C= —+F
A Ld” ~~ —-—+ | * hate 4
VodiTaT OY 7
SS eee = Se ee
|
—— ania ————
o°0 7777 ‘ALP SIV EN YOD TH VOTOIPYV IND
at Mr gay S77 FIKA WIT ——
Sie a a
|
et OT SNOLAT SIA
oA7e@ ‘eae acme IVUN DITIOY
ate Tr | Rae ae Ong
e9|9 > mz ‘we ie ~ SMUMZ 3
en ae, DR OE FEE - h h SAWIALT DIIT 2Aywy hin
ez : or url way 7 aEMo arp eR ~ 1/779 Joy
a a A a ae e es DANI IIIZ
Le 2 . S297 COLL Wi wo
oe : TSO v7
| SIZIPOND HF PASTS a
- G9GNI YV3IA B4OWKVE
OEY 27
BN a @. ol
‘ 4
60 «SANGO OA ‘6 ‘? YY A law
a os —-—— ee ewe . ee ene oe = <——* .
xY y we se: adie Die i
/
Pee
(opot w104) E-D OINPAURS
CRT mene
pon eee 7 ae
snluwd eisal ** é (oped GhT BuO eye); OP? 1823 He AyD”
i * Dan > Saanoe am
: ; Saw Hf Os dH 5 y
| wOes ANNOY BIN) (ophes pOsns 10 ye. 8 Pus saqueny) COJNIOW JWOM FdAL WO INIDS
| $ 9 INIT WOME GUY? ALIWADIS TWID0S WO NMOS S¥ NOLHIS GIAO TIW) 4118 30 JWVN F44L WO INISS |
INNOAY blind be MOVIG DTI NI OIiheN a
: . WOUNDS JO BUA ON ALIQIIDTS Iwl les
* ° ———— —_ came ou a
4]
(apOd gif “21Gug “22ypO psd 10 Ayo ‘yaanis pee sequwoy) ScIBOdY SSINISNS
—_— ——
— LL soneenaneeenceecconene | -
{ow ‘yorsneysas “2/078 4109009) KWL LNDWAOTIW) STIS OL LOWONS SHLIANLOY Ssiwisng ,
_AEbe: .¢ 2 =. 2c — © a. > aoe o
‘wot «)” ‘pores Bun 00198 vt Buby) (J (y) 0 weeul] (¥) Of OND deed prey d SOM SypuOm T] UHY S84)
“**** . ** ** — - ee i} v rT) (1 ee ee -_* ee ener Brjue Sag saad aiQuaey +eyyo 90 1) (961 TPL} ap-ayed Vv
“(2004 po 0d ws Apu ponperes bOe 24 Cduy yBnoys wane) Lsryas byyy AQ pOsenod 1004 4)6.. pu
ee ee
32VdS SIME NE DLIN® LON OO FSVII4
' BHUNS anuesry ito. dpe)
y 1) | 32@ Aysnraq (21208 INOA OF Jury pas? 404 yosgsedeg hus 20504 +4
I9G SUIODUY POWADMIUNA-py9s yo Ysodoy “SN on J
“Ay -jopd sd Pus Aj. yesmde/ Way Ye? YF I) SJOAIAING JNA p. @ “BjUL@PUIDIP 4NOA “HOA OF Wj YEAR “SBUjusED snok vo
paseg ‘$)1aU0q Ave Bun. y ul pasa % Junoor® S9iL PUNVIIE AuNIVs [6190S NGA 40) OIW MOjey WO) OY) VO Popodas SpUNnOWEs oul" weedy
4>e)eP Jou og -
DEL bOg “GI SUH “| OF UO pw ewy WUNOUUE Sry) 19549
nus “SSay pf “Ov Zcvs 299 ‘0099S SOL oll pn ey quawAojdiue,.a5 Uf
| Pus G1dy 18qUZ «44, HI 1 ZDADYDIQ™ “6 40 9 & 1) —eUNODuI wawAodwe j/25 Of
mojag “}4 wey
, se ee ee He 8 * Ce Quy WOH (9)Q CUH 1901;9NS) Couteg 6
MmOjeg 5 way UI Pus azey s2WUg 0 “(Q)g PUE (¥)g SPUN JO 1HIOL 0)
. . . . . * . . . . . . . . 6 auy ‘7ete
wu0y wos KE} “WO'1's 0} BeMQns ‘Aue Wy ‘Sdu PayodauA (3)
ca- eee) - © * "Zaay UuOs UO Paerpuy se saBem WD I 4., 1PIOL ‘) @
e . . . . * s x8) Ayunsas
0} }20/QNS SBurusee JuawWAojdwa jas Pus SaSem P2WiIqQwo? jo uMOWE jfS94.4; dul £
—- - -—— —_-- ——- . —
(aied yo yas Lp y Hou OQ “**H Jue howe 4198 0} 322/GNS Jou ase nod ‘oov$ spun #9 ey WD
BO Deeg 20WUQ "GS YUH) UO ropOGO JUs.UAOIDWA jj9S wt) (+ ->) 40) sSunus@2 pau (FL Gg
nae 2 8 2 ¢ © o *G - * * yOueTUtB,O peuoyeusazu! JO yuswUsIAOS Us vidy @ YH BAUS WOsy (2)
* * (Copor wgy) }-s ainpayss ayescdos ‘(posh UONDS 4) E SuHj 16) Z SLI) V9 payodas Bunuse) wo.4 (p)
ecccccecce | *eeccereccescessccecoosces ° . ° ° . . . . . . . . . ° : . : . 1co2 wij Bunny aue 3d pray oaey noA ”
AjuO sejuQC BSUONNNIGID 82 PiI9S UENSUYD & 40 ‘sops0 SNOIByos @ yO saQMWaW “49).1u, 4 B SE B2V95 Wry (>)
de he Sa, / we ele + + + © © G@unuey weyp 29yI0) “292 “SauNyUDA yujo! “sdyys/PUWED Wess (q)
* + © * + © + (yp Quy WO yunewe Aue sso) ¢ du) SsaUISNQ WOrs (4)
—udwAOdwa-jjas wos ($60) 40) SJ~'422 IN G
een ceeecescecccesecesceces ot ceeeesresesooceceresers+ oOe eeee Sees cetee esse cee sess sees Sess seeseeeees esse teeters eee $2a2n0¢s 40 $a>\uas popn)>xe Ay'200S
* € UH LO PapPNAjour se2INOS 40 SAMAISS PIPN}D+2 Woy ($5 >} 30) 2woruy PN
(@2ues2;9p 40) 2:2,
. — eS ae. a ae a ae ae a ee . cz avy “Dd anpayrs
/ uy UMoYs wee SSdUIENG JO SISSO) (SSO) JOU WO J2C1};QNS 40) WOM YY CHV &
/
cagecoce fl oaghs-seengn@fens-ercens ey ae ee ww. = 2 & ete « & is - (ssaursng evo UeY) OW 4
“a : '
clit Orb o7 yunowe pouiqued 4209) LZ O44 “COPOT W204) D BMPIYIS «1 —MOYS (550) 40) Ajwed VAN t
\
ZPEC PES IF WIPO D 7 A?
sagt.) Agpanreg f4) 209 (pae> Apanses [208 VO UMOYS $e) NOSHIY GI4O1dWIATIS 40 Livy
s/f.7 2 ‘UKNd "> — se? MOLES (? Va - 24 44D “ A a 2
(OPOT W204 JO T SICH + UMONS BE SGINC IV OV a%ued
“VpMpeyds Speswdos © Vy PSs vod PUAG tus jjvr Qaeg
‘OINPsyos S14, Vo
SdSsvUISNG ANOKA JO We wis (S3S404 40) S}yOid DujqwoO> “ssauISNg DUO UCYy) C1OW pey NOA fi SE=3 DINPIIS BUY AjUO 4,0, !.0) <4
‘yc SI) Up py VOU OP ‘seruy Apanass [E;IOS ©) PLIGNS BUM YR 4M G4VW JO QEY'S$ 40 ‘sch Ui qual “Solow peposd yy ww
- f Z vided Ye BUOY uy bo 0210.2. e s8 bed
} (pe - QPOT Muay ‘uangss XV) B.WODL) 4NOK O) ¥/NPOtIIS SEN Ye enna oS am
“ul (oot
MOP PIC UAopliasry-$p9S Ajpatd35 (LJICS gu trapyeysadissoy €-9 Vhitados
- Pao ' : 4
a
——
—
4-7 Y*eFA4UL LIV ELSE ee -
< IS ES | NS eS hal
-
Pad
i OuS YO ‘MA dvul we a * Le (02 Orwoe onven
: 29~C Toay MN SHORE wnat" PPY. ton ets pga vr i ox0y wig
4 eer aC NES u J 4 7) O d d N 3S euwsoou PEW CUO AjUO 1 VaA® WIS ISM 2 HIM ONY ONY ochelesd yang, slo " O10
‘ _ Sota Matted 7 Mad ee es py ® 2 vines
‘el pemouy due Sty 64 YOYS JO VONCWiejul Ve Ue Pee" Lene ap ay “aedery dog 1910 VOTED & Ay \ coed pO pdwao pue oe. a
‘enn 1M seneq pue OB pe movy Aw pe ed OU) Ol pee Shee epee PEE bepipey ® Bujpdes Jey, 10 Bury det “Wangan Siad beer Ubad bang Ebru siew 4 A Obed pe sencued Mpen
Myed posse (J 40 popenjad 502% em ‘Wpuuy 85,05 ‘sald ‘wr Addy Yo tion VE HON WINS Ge
~ 2) oo 2 ee MOL PIM WAST LOGT OF Poypvs> SIM HOA EE OU JO JUNoWy vz puna: 40
a4 5 * Wowhedsang says ‘(OT Guy) KC) UeNR sos) Oe (TZ UN) SpusuAcE yy (z Ong acy
v
>»
if
%
oO
£2 Lint ¢ 81) 0 ye ry wy deg ONG S2UE/EU 49149 “(91 DUH1) KEY YeU{) ¥29) 910 (FZ SUH) SWUDUIALH J) zz q
| 60 t0Z*T = 012 wiog te UoTYdvdxNy (Od Pus ‘ol ‘GE ‘Z1 souy PPL) peyog ile g
“°F BL wHOJ—"AUY Bay “QE Tp WO p—wE} OUHORLD jesapay Arm Suyuoy Oz x<
Se Bere, C180! 59g 900 98—s154 yowa sivw 12 Om) PWM IL VOG003 ET 3
é0 #02" Tt pa eens 9019 8 Se pow & ovdedians coe Oprjr) syuduiAed xv} PrcwiHys] 590! eT 9
ae! ae | S1U40 4 YICHC) POY Xp DtULdUF IIPIJ Wit ZT
a _— UoUNA?
BE) 265°C a ee ee ee 8 ee re ‘CDT S2Uy ppe) KEY eyo, QF <a d
| ae ESS -_ Roe © OLR eS oh) awe (1-4 40 ¢~ PINPIYIS) xc} WIWAOIIiUd j)95 ct Koy g
; BEE oo cy oenge ie Po *(Quawaj;eys yoene) WPI49 YUdUSdAUI LEIA 400 Burndiuosas UOsp xel QpT a
eC] 26°C ee ee eee 6 ee nie EQNS) XP} D0DU) EMT
a oe 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . (s oun ‘A weg ‘Z o3ced 1044) $)'po19 1Cyo4 tt
ee) eoo*e + °° _* CT 00H 298 “ainpayrs ayey wey 10 ‘OT Our) 205 “9IQe4 KEY JON WO) xey zI
TZ AO ZT ZT ouy vo Map dvyug (sud dMaysus SO [1 eset uo VN pouIs vy@4s we) BUSA Ag Junowe
$11) UO xe} UNOA vanidi4) “oun Si) UO B2UCjey su “Gey ouy WOd) ITT BUN Yeajyqug PIT
ee
i 610) N00) 7a ee , 656, & Sas 009¢ kq ‘aaoge "py eu UO Suoiduioxd jo 49qLUNUY je}0} Aid yyy Tt ;
€2 tity ® ETO i An Te ee Ae a? gp * * * 6 auH wou CTT UH Wes Qug If
‘(Majeiedas Suny pur parnew H# O0S$) OOO'I$ O pa\wy (2) 40 (1) sapun UOHfPornpod 101}0}
° “PANOTS “yp wtp UO Po ney? VONJudIN—a “Ndi
CCi ESS"? 4} 4209 40) COTS Smid (wsnjos oWCIEdGOs Jus Poe prIusew y COTS) OvzZ$ (7) Ndiiwd
40 G vj 90 Woried OT (1) xoL
°40 498s] 81:9 29,Uu9 avow 49 000'S$ $1 6 oun puc *SUON Ny «fie jou op m ¢( y
oy = Fee uey ‘2 sed Woy IID) 4449 “SUO pep BZD) NVA “oeTr
—ONpIyrs Hey xe, TT
: : : ——=-— —- <mmes 88 69.69
' 27 OU UO xe) 42, “P40 “9 ‘A “CTT SouH os pow OF “SUdINYSUF UF S9}GQC} LUOy xe} A042 yan
INOA Guy * Gt MCU) SS9) St G GUY pue SUL pop w7IUISy JOU OP NOA MWe. ae, OT hg 145 sandy
; fa, ey Oe “(4 wy hoy B ouN Peg HS) DtwOdUF pe joy Ojim puy
"AG 20H “Wy Wey ‘Zz 290d tod) SyUdUI Stil) y Pucqiny yjoq
6
8
i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ‘ (9 pue S Soul Ppe) WIDE Z jo Mud
9
a
4 . . . . . . . . . . . .
00 VUU' 2 ie ite ie. a Oe (8 oun “Wey "Z aded W091) OWODUE 4..1)\9
Ne apnjouy
P i2Y 2% Ws0s 10 € KE2D ERY ¢
eccese stent ‘UsNjol JU
<q YONCURIdKa WIENE Z-M SUNIO4 PayreHe UO UMOUS Fou HE “DD “Setiy ‘SOUEIPS “Sociv gg § ouosey
Ee ee Pw) 2 ~uOnduad«d tw p PUY? Fup vs JOP Upim (14) mopia UUIAAss | ) A |
(f O6y ") Weg ‘Z 220d wor) SWIPL W1IP s9yIO jo 49qQWwAN a¢ PIOYISNOHY JO pron posewury [) pr
2 aan sequin saquy COCCCC + Oseeee 60060000 te Le SOCPSSEESSSOeR CUR SRSENSREBESEDSs «+0 ees cccscce _ aeceecosences Seteeee -o
pequbecocaunecenncscocss ~eettauG ~ nok Pn A\1IN305 yeros
4 Pus OEM YS4y J9y 4G SHY OAS Usipoa & Buy OSj2 SI
YHA PIA OY VAIDWYD WIPUIAIP INA jo SatuCU 44 CE | oum so pUeGsny ANOA fp “AjOpewe.:us Buy) Posey 1 of
“él Sreweur { [) =) [2° * SYM GZ] (sworu) pey ove Ayo 4 vers) winya1 WHol Bump poses, Qe
i.e swt
joqueu sug |) 's) ([Y * Nosung ez a
Pur, | 49AOIOGD seiNBay SuOndiuory ‘2u0 Ajuo PUP—$NI23 5 ery
U4NGDE Jurel 5, “Shwapyre , ue APAQMUD Poo. rd id et |
i Jtes otetue ps e saduy 0d pueraed InOA
vy cone Pe
J} no} S2ssopDe puv sowey S96 49109 “Susana, ~i€se25 OF JWIOT Zo Of OF @ie.cdy, wou B. a Hh UOSe ds BAND
& 2 [059990 6 apr y “Pers vou it Cw4nS.. wham “wume® Se ww. , “4h 8) S961 sey Gstiges OA WHO pre cu So eepee Pw sue oe, «4
GEO :06 F 26s 98216 Pray riug “puta,
MING OF DUES! yy “sQuUMY 6.23174 990 417 Poet PUR AO [SCI 10 ang “hr Q
ULwosaor WN oanzy yee 402 3
a Ba1039 930 1004 ae ' (24694 [4404 12) 208 pus bHPWAN) 04, 6 dwOH t
A 2S¢2 tt SSS TOUILy CULCAOY a ‘Cd Loy s
u
(WM9d WOH HS PUEQsM4) “
BoM AL aed besa OL ewry itr) (09 jo HEN eIPprw put SHUEY PEG CEA WIN Lws PLrod 1) (they pus swe yey A
| . ‘ , ) + MIE Srey (Ut) — pret edeg AittvSeess SH rT 7 = Bu yes nA a a
l ( a f ve Pee “" Bupuwy9eg sek ayerey *oul@ 49 “QOCT “IE s9qQusaxEg~| Asenuer sek wy “ |} -y py
, = . o a . , ‘ a ee .. * Pe, . -
Oe ) } CALC L] MEL OW os uy (Lae Wiis eF re
: <_ / or) . "s ¢ . ,
Z-~ VLOCOZIZ) 264 ,
ee ;
~ TaNVAY \d09. 1838
cee ct ee nent —
yon . i wag i <=
* (Q BMPIYy25) Youd
-— er eek
Cy P2Sjy4 [VOR
UML TAN
Stet. ossoegeocesceuscousesanesseusssceene *
TORR e ee eee er eeee eacesesepnnercocescessseatecssesnece * SPOS MOOS OE+ CeeeHE bere ceceseeseeess
veneeneeee ™ (SUO2NZySUF jo 6 03vd 29S)—suosnpop SNOQUC IIS
SOB TAT _) aa viiouss iaidin wey
meee eeeUSREROUORRUREREREDCEEREEESStheeEEehaneensensss ++ et ee eee SOPOCO Rete Hee ceeceees PO POO te eeeee
CPCOODS OLS L 00s Coe beee seeSeceeecce *teeee hh Ln COSCO+ CCPC eeee <Beccessce (221059))) 42WIO
OOOT CCPC OSS S Os seereeseeeses . . . ae3poy —~28uadxa §$9s9)u)
TTTT SOE (eee er etter eeeeeee
+e. OPO COREE e + + eee eee
CA V00OF7 OS
; i Ae ots eit’ a ny a sity) re rT ‘ Py suioagy
4) SUSI YM, Ud os Ay SduwwAuy §
* (uouspeys 49)0 10 OOTZ
W104 YICVC) Os..04n9a SSOUISMY II pluLy e
" * (EOGE tuo; Yorye) sosurtx Juyaow z
* (UQwWIVEIS Ponto, 49419 40 Opry wioy yr}
VW) T vided 'g vay ur popnyrut pt Aes yg, t
Syuowisnipy "Hi DYE
rts | —
“44 9 90u Tondo puw
Or DZ °Z uy non gL SouN Fpe) wtoly
OMOGWESE
L——.
“SSO 8OS S608 CRORES Oe + +0002 Seeeeeeeeeees
a0 MVC
NID) Fe) OF PITY OI
(MEU vjr)s) dWwe cu! SNOW) IISIY Z
— eee - wae ee -
* (4 vmpoyos) QW0du wey 9
"(Q @INPayrS) Ay 13 Joud 0 IBuUCI xd 10 aes S
"(2 inpsyrg) awWoour ssoursng »
14 $9%0) (001 DO WWIULIY Tg H/25
ie. = 6 Pe * Apatuid uosuay
cumnenal “*seesereensmmerel © 6 5 5 54g DWIODuF JCI} puc ae}5
Coceseagpoceee a « (suo snsysui jo GT 28ed 32s) sajes [@s2UdH
OUI/OS’I }e30) pue ANS
Obs. Frcoceeescosecesccoce. ° e . ° ° . a aC}s9 12 —"saxey
iad a POE es Fo
—. ——_— 4 yu genetics sf fs f 96 C44 ews £
‘O49Y Su4}! YINS jo pe}O} 49 -().. suraypeys
Posndas 40, $401} 2N4jSu) Gos) YSe> UCUL4IWIO Z
Seeees | + seeecccccesesescese sl . . . . . . SUONNQuUOD yse> feyOL T
1° O ORO e eee ee eRe tee se eeee eee #eeee (eet eweees eee ee eeee ee et eeeee
es ee ne . . . . . .
OPORO0 SOD OSOSOSCCCCCeseces
Suausnaennenesenenseseeseenecesssccesesteccencecces POC eee eee eeee SOOO OMe ee eee eee sence PP ee eee eens
+o OOOO Oe Ot ee eee eens Cn Or teeee (92)W9}))
‘22 “Si9pI0 Aouow *s¥2ay? Bu'pn|2u1—ysea—-suonngujuoy
“4 UO~Vejay WIMUIMOL 404 >LOHINaysur
be B SS5.d bus '¢ oun WO4p g DU, eqns Z
— . . . . .
T 820d “6 duyy jo %e sau} 9
"(P pue € souy pov) OL gS
“ * * * (Swaiuod adouensis Wydsoy
| OPNj2U!) Sasucdr>d UIP “y2d0 424N10 &
en. ee eeee . . . . . TI eu tuo4y zZ oul y2CI4QNS £
" T aed "6 oun jo &Z7 saquy z
an saennenenetineds “a er s8nup Pue suisipaw }O }s09 01 T
. . . .
“SUS.SIN NSU) OS 980 JO Sot “ISN Pornudy YC MY—(OSIMuayj0
40 Do. iieuy Ay PoesusdJwos Wu) Dudes IWilep PU jeHpyy
“UCihIAWiD Pscpurcys 10 PIG, rey
OSM OU OP KOK AMO 6-1) —SUON Vip op POIZUS)y “Ay 1uVd
(9 "Y2S) “9}9 "syens) 20 $9}C}S9 ‘sdiysuauped
*29ICAOS PUL vjuvs ‘sONMuUe pug Sudisuay ¢§
—_—_— —— —---
4.4(22 9 ‘QZ @7 Sv.) PUIOIU! 4S219)U} [2VOL PZ
\4 as —_—- 22 euly je}o] ee
POeeeccccccorscocces (9 ‘spuoqg) ISI1D}Uy 4210 32z
je eul JOO] ese vorr errr een ennne
dh LLL Te ee eee eee eet eeeee
"TOC e HOP ORR ee ee eee eter es
eens OPPOPSOSO OSSD OOS OS es ee ees COCeecs (s3uiacs enjyniw
URY} 49410) SyIsodap yueq uo Wa1auy Qz
l “| tz oul jo] Te Ce e+ ee + Cee ee deeeeee
“SPORTS TOP ORDO SES e Sere seeesesoes
eee etait
PP PPCSO COCO OC OO SCS e+ ee eeeeeseees “SCOOT SS FOO SSe + OSs O8eCeeeCescecos
"399 “SuoIwn Pad “syueq SBuracs jenn
“20SS¢ ULO} puv SSUIACS WuOuy S3urU.L y ez
(oAed po @tueu) WSQ49j 44
—_—_——— _—— +
e@ °° * (0202 Wey) S$a) Jou
——8T Gul) $s2) OT eur) SPpudpi rip FG2K2L BT
"Stee *eeeeerreeeweeeeees « «
©" 8 pt pue On "ae souy 1), Of
© SUONIAQIASIP diqarzuoy py
teeeee T. eeeee OOP ee ewww eens “SUOIINQH ASIP vice [edeg a
(SU0!}2n4}Su) aos) WORD OL
44° . . . . . . . er oun Lees |
Nu neesS*000CCCSRSUSSSROROOONS 2 8oSereeccoenesesbesceséccoccces OC OP eee ee eeee
eerereee ieee aL ee i ef tee ee Pete weet eee SCOR eee seees Ore eeeee .
hh Se oeeee . . . *eeee ;
ee eeeeeee . * . eee . **- teteeee .
FOOT COOTER HSH e+ eeeereseee ee te eee eit Le niseoene see eeeeseseneeees + cesepessensees
scones ; (A\yurof 40 ‘ayia ‘puegsny Aq Pi?) yooys 404 (n “() *(u) ey"
HED 40 WEN) §-4)4 UD SUG. Jy 4910 2019 PUY Spurpir.g OF
‘Meso HOMULEU) 1SY}OSIIU005 WO
ee ee
~ _——.. a ee a ee
| a~ roe? = eo. - e Ge UT 90 U9 pow w.vy sdJUZ
ee hae Te TOPCO OH COC OOO SOROS ees ces sees
Wepuedrp ay VW. ee Stn) perow x0 CO 19] 0, 10. @, Oy em r004 Buy
PM Ff indy dy Peds 66h eee, j Bes wh O\. Ged | amp BI wHE envy
hy Zt) De.. Le ema vie ‘beodspy ir
Ape We te and Diysvorejay (q)
CoP yl bl oul weewy
T 60rd “Qe Ou wo Vee]? Spuspucdye
Te ae *
4pouloouy aT luvd
‘wAOQge Pv}vi| > ‘wpsdgp JO J90Q\U.U fe, >
“y
t
ied Vint ee eet Te) Te ee +e + eee ees eeee
et ee POCO eee eeeee PP Oe eee tees ereee
(Oj;9P24y 8 Yee P< POOU BF Ore 56 a0K Wy) Jay
* -_—Uee «gg — —_—e-
Y 40) Aju yep das. Forondiu _ 1 UV
‘; ° ;
‘ . bad
es. &
Or tte ee “-
"8 f'2) Bernen g
top ee > MCUs UWibings wited MONLONUGY “Iwata Ry Z/ BZAViw eNOMAMUIUL OD “*Wae
eee eh SE
4OnpPscla (aavis VIS Sint NOLLONGIU IwioL ~NVISMUIBANOD WILLIS
. —tinK — —-) a -_-— — - eee eee Ss eee cee.
Ts als SQOINVITIOSIW aavas Ivion | OO SZ 7 Iwesuuy - LNOILANDIYVINOD AVEO
——, wee <<< qe _—— eee a Tc
(QINIVALY “HIS) BIGHEEKaA “IAAVUL Coy :
oad oes SNOSNVITZIGIW IWH3034 Viol a
ee .
eo —_ — —
,
(Q3HOViav 37NG3HIS) S3Ss07 AL IWNSWD
8100.4 7 IwWs | $ 30V5ni
AUONAWT ONY SWHO4INA IwisadslOO SZ j Sant Sth Suet’
(Q4NOWiiv 3qNGaHDS) ANOWIw } ‘ Siro 40 gS VIF ust ys
, . ee nek A
32»Oud Awe
co Fond NOlAVUWES4G NUNL EY xv BWOON! | \ ‘ <)> eh
SNOlidisoeens ony sana “A0uUd 3WODN! |
CO? $334 08 115804030 Buve oo | S3H2DuM.
31 Vi FGNV SNOILD 135 j 34vigGanyv
Bes 8 089 SHOSNVITDSIN | ITE Say SNOIINSININO
ClH SA 4 AS 4¢34N!I Awiod SNOILINGIO AVOiGaw Lan
TWOINT ° 7
Senne ta (3) % (4)aes
—
_S4N -W3SUNUWI Oe eA Seu
S435N3dx3 WW3IG3w Ivio4
‘¥44s “SBSSWI95 ‘Qtv Ontuew,
AN3IWAv3us ‘ooW 8O4 VIAN
"SNI_ LN3OISSV Guw MaVo
§ }2NWIAUn
— a -—}—. —_—
G tor +sSawrZ 4¥n¢ 7 7% £7 Ls a S°VAladso)
CPS PeH/(7O ~ @) PWG 7 Iwan ss - wee
pei (iva Konm 2 TeSaa FA a aeen
» ar : 4 raver me ~_eee ne me tite -—— <— ie ee _ =
CV ALK \O'4,7 S3xXVi Viol
Read , rr Te + - — EE eee
00 '\ 7, VW? #b xvi ANINOS WO
‘| xx! Per XV AN aW3SAWY
- —-$-— —_—- oo 7 tee SS ee _——_+
xx xxx *Vi "34 ONY 3NOMGsINBL
> 2 eae < <eanes °c <2 «<u i —~ ———
xx, MKX *Vi NOMLVivNOGSNVUL
=x oe a — | ee _- - - _ - a Pe a a _—-— «cee ane
xx) xxx 9 $7 *WL JWOON! Bivis
Pe 2 -—- - ee tee ae _ _— ——— = ee ee rr ee a ee
Oo So 00sre Xvi S39Ws
eee eee -_-_— — 2 meee _~- _ — = a 2 ee TE eee —_—_—_..
JINVUNSNI ALIteVSiAa yivas
— —_——— — -_ _— Eee <= < _ = “oa: “= <« 7! °° == «= ~ ad Le — _— eee ee —— ee
O°454 34b2 ¥VL Siwis3 vay SiStiN IO ONY $¥OL.D.00 |
a —~ - . . ee —ae - =. . - eee ee — | te ieee - -_
vu? Cs 100 PY o'/ t/- op/ xvi ALNSdONd IVNOSE3ag SINIDIG3IW ANY BOAHA LoN
| SSON9D ‘row 404 s334
—_—_ ee ° Ce! <_ —_---— _ —_—— — — _—_—— ~ -__- —— << — —e tc a
xx) «KX ouinw | | SONIDSIG GW ONY Bonu
— eee - . —- << <a ad ee ee ee ee —— <— — —_—— — _— — -——- ee
Javis WvurIor4 S3XVL] 34vis Wwe3ad S3ISN3dXx3F “TYDIG sb
SUOWINGIO 40 3105195
YS c " ©3ON3 UVIA 3BQAWKVL
aww
“eV "AIO 7 aT Y
a
_
) i cette tn ln, tlle am ee
——
i S/F
cL? ed-bee ow mare ee ‘OWVING * 1-#oge1 —at o ’
i “ “ 4th, "4 >! e - —ét—
i STS "9 “MW LPOL -
: DIVINDO2QDV Wend_GNeevAy | per UE) 104)0 10185010 50 OES caus
oa “a1eq ns ee ———— = ¥en +n sen
sv I9/ Y= uwaLUOd ANAD yy) 2 Lis ¢s
*@iwO dU! P- ey Gud Ao jt VAS NOS ISOW 3 iM ONY ONY i ’ \/" ry) 4 rT 4 teu
“9 of sh poe” a Ce ae ca _Pri > >! ™~ 2s? . a x * ub
y Bi bd >
- “aE pajpmouy due icy 8y YYM /O VOHFw Ojpul I/F VO Paceg bi VOUT E)D2p oe “sasedre) vey eye ylSiad @ my , weeded = dite Pue y 91109 iS
“ane, St pay 0q pus 9390) eouy du dw je poy ou “bee “SpWeW2IC|S Pur $-,H2QIS Futaut durcode Ber, mows “ermyee Syd PRUhuT Ee BEG | PUL ea) oe F FUMOS 90 Sentedd eye
P yuo Perjeyul jee pepunpes $5278 e Ye spuvy POulaA¥g “Si. Ll duly wl Mo4pOod Flu dee. 7 img 2 4
b0\ACL / ‘ sf ff 5 #8 * * WOE PIPEWNSZ QOGT OF PO}IPIId Ysim NOA GI Duy JOJUNOWY OZ a
4 oO prOZ "/ e@e *.7- * yuawmAedsaa9 19)U2 (9] BUY) xe} VEY) Jo JIE] DIE (DZ ] DUN) SpudwWALd yy ET PUFIZI)) 20
| 4uinposeqyy quire pny wt Aeg (ONG B2Ue}eEg 19} Ua '(9[ Bul!) KePUCYESSIFOIE(9/ | QUN)SpUdXWACd gy ING KVE 8
| eYca Si7 oF
PLL/ ae: tT) ee (QZ1 Pure eZ] Sou PPw) yo, BZT Seorrnsset §
. 0 S| e3e2 aa8
(pred S29ym 29450) (11317 & Se PIMOWE PudUWANTIZAO POSE OPN) U4) sdAQj Gu. 2 ave 2
' oo . 4: Z, SjudwAeYd xe} PIjewys} GOGI @ URYL 2.0u! 105
— St! all arr) FP? POWYS Sa? \ ot ee PI_qs0" 2, ainok g
re _ < (Z-M 86204 Yor) eben XU) DWODdUI/eJIP IY eo] Set is nod. apay &
7é0LA°° \4f ve * om ars | (G1 PUe pL SeuH Ppe) xe IMIOL OT :
: or ee woe BP e.e 5 40 €-2D BINPIYIS) avy yUdWAOWGWd-)9g =~ST b
~ Ve V0LZA aS Se ee eee ee an Duy WO EC] BUY JICAIQNS) xe} QWOdU, HT spusuileg
Ba? 977 one ee 8 ee Se (¢ duy ‘A ey 'Z BBed Woy) spposr |cjpoy «=ET SHIPWID
; yA Lr re 4 * * * QP] Quy 88s “aINpIYrs Dey xe] 40 ‘OT BUY DOS ‘ajQey xe] J9YND WO.)xey Fy BOL
toile [2 ; “ZI uly UO rey 4eQUy ( SUD No sprt 40 [| B4ed VO BNPeyrs views ay Buisn Aq jurnowe
Siy} UO “Cy JNOA 23n314) “SUL SIY) UO SIULICG 49JUZ QT] Dury twos dT] Duy yoespqng PTT .
. *.s ’ 0098 = DAOGE ‘Pp Jui UO SUOIFOWAIKD JO J9QIUNY jej}O} Aininy ITT ’
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . -" 6 aut wi0dj ett eur) yocsjqns ait
{ ‘(uanjyas dpesedas Buy) pue 7
PawseU 1 OOS$) OOO’ IE OF P2wH Si (7) 20 ([) ZapUN Payndwor YOHINpPop o4uL =e )
FACYUR ‘Pp DUH UO PIU.e)> 1183 2
VUONDWInd Y2ed 10) OO1$ SNA (UsNjas apeIEd IS Buty PURE PIIeEW pt OOT$)00.' $ (Z) -nudiuos 4
aq "40 g DUH JO JUGIs0I Cy (1) >
ASIC ? 9 10 494e] 94) 49}U9 D10U 40 OOO'SS S$! G BUH PUL ‘SUONINPIP az1Wa}! JOU OP Nd 4 xe]
Al ee “2 eBed WOss 1e}0) 49)Ud “SUONHINPIP BZwoy NOL yy UTT %.
—ojnpayrs dey xe, TT 4
* — — — a a ieealianitel uf —"
‘ZI Ou VO rey 4ahUR P 40 9 ‘GQ ‘e [][ SOU @SN JOU OG ‘SUO: Wonaysur ul $3)QCc} wo <=
| xe} 2NOA PUY OCU’ SE ULY) $52] St G DUH DUE SUONINPIP v2WI)}! JOU OP NOA jj—ajgey wey OFT >
TE 40 OF 22u)12 Guise Ag ae, ernbig A
| OF | FOr y , (Z Guy wus | VU Poe AQIS) BWiOdL. Jeo] 6 2m
< we ee se 8 8 . ‘s duy “HE Wed "Z eed woy) spudswysnipy = g Pl PUEQsAY
al , . = YjOq jOdWWOIuU}
re) 2 |\0r 7 » € & & “Sire 1s 6 - & (9 pues sour PPT) OL Z Wie apryrur
' Oo | r coy — eee eS. F ee FS 8 (6 Duy 1] Meg *Z GIed WOI) DWOdU! 494IO 9 ‘uInj}e yurol jy}
. O1 \ ; > Tivia wet
OD A2/ < VUONEUEIAKD YICVES Z-M SUIIOZ PIYIENE VO UMOYS JOU jj “Ij}9 “SAH ‘SduelES “Ss M G oul0s]
7? #4 Puiu jd SUOCHUWWeay eyo, Pp Pry? Jud) VIIeP YPiw (4y) HOP™M Buimiaans (J 71
, (e oun peg Z Bec wos) SJUIPUITIP 49YJO jO1IQwWAN QE PJOYISNOH jO PCapyy PRHIeEWUAD Pt
> , 44 4 s8Qwau jay 4 ee a
fc?
ore: = saquinu Ayuns
; Su And ‘MOA 9S [C1IOS PU DWeEU JSIy Jay 20 SIY DAB Uanjase Juyy
1YNM PIA OYA VdIPpYD PUIPUIGYP INOA JO SQuTcU JSsig OE OSjE S41 Spm JO PUL YSAY INOA py Apupese foe Fuypy Poauic,y C1) >t
Clivuce) O ‘s po QyA QZ | (QWOdU! peY aU0 Ajo pr UIAI) UANjVA WIC! BLYY PIE LA aT
— | {J C) ® ; JJ9SANOA ez asus L) et
pry sda IO Sy sey~NBoy suondiuoxrg ‘DUO HIBYI— SIPLIS Jun j 4
JAI MISA OP §
JIweroe 4
"SISSIINMPS PUES SIwie POS s9}US “SUINGIs o}L40Is OF PUNO! 10 JuIOl OF BPEL IIS UIs RaBvey yj “Voseas O
salogytud yuatard g vores» 6 ay m OAID “PO)yy wLvw 4 (. Owes... vpem VAOQY SE diuws Sud DE eG] 209 Us 108 ANA WO Pre e pue ae 3
9/29 :0F ‘79> UINvItdSwD Orv~bLI7IA) @.
—_ °
uinjyasyujof ne sdqwenes.opan =
—- : PIS Pus “Ayo od 1 ¥eH “LD O
s??> _....., 2009 dt7 persed ome _ SE Oem a =. °
7 P- a> a2e'stT7 (4 Pst F
SIP SOV Gy é
. sake J 8 pootaid ’ UCHE IAI /ae,y (OPO! [Ory 10 [FINS PU LaQWAY) EHPIEEE B14 nm
Csto: re. Ss SIS : WDN UY ED vVvIMoy “a ‘OC ACY 3
anita aii pucgqenys) 4 -
Se Qed Alper desd PRpled ora i’ wey jie} (yPOg JO Syerul B/OPiw Pues Fdwey ps.) o> “Loree purcl gy) paypret Pus wes i an
*e ‘ - wal esis eMusvrsyy [WUsyjuy-— pUewpPeIeg Astiseest SN 61 But ue sol *
«" / ’
. iy } } (x ee BurvuiBIaq sodA VpQeees 104.0 29 C9KI TE 44QWa20g [| A/ONMUUL BEV BY) 205 \] ;
| ‘ sh ‘ a ; » af >) q ‘
. \ iJ ULUYPOL] UOT OWE DU POI DY) Ser.
~
JyE9NTASe es :
; ae.
_ TIAVIIVAY Ad09 1839 Pee. —
a a
ee
_~* — *
FT A ed eel
HS -1LL-O- 041" TV im Opes ihimannktoo SAY
—_— naam V1 ouy | Netto]; Cony
‘
—_———— oe
SUONINASU IO { VIed Sos pu
491U3 (pneu | souy PPL) SppasdpCyoy ¢ [) 9494 420y> "J0AO} fe NOK OF SoruGdaa PISCYD 49 VD Oye
VWP42 SPUN JULNIVAG? DIIp-ACYL H VSUIIKD UL PLY HOA j1—NOIL Vs. UOINE ANNODOV BSiaduds
“COLT LT G04) P242 Key UMiaI0g E
(AONE W404) 91d pudUNSaaAU; Z
Bee’) ete vo pue viay sayy
Cp Uitte.) | swum) SPMIUSal ps puget S$
(9 OINPI3y>;) P|s> aWorW JUIWIINOY |
o~- A—
1 (9S0662 wie 4s Wren) “d)9 “suEgd Wuswamas
, ©} SUDSIwE pos upius yrs Aq SjusuAuy p
oe « SUPW9 “A LYVd a ~ Ce MUOIETS 49490 40 NOL Z WIE
| YC) wr uwdag »ySVUuISNG vahopiuny g
eS) 1 (ert aun "fod 09) §NO1LINGIO IW1OL| | oa
Ss jos 444 4 Sung iy) sayjo peyoy | (COKE Ui04 U2eUN) Sosuadue SUMOW &
— = >> "<« — : (QHUdWaICIS Purnbas 49410 40 OpPZ Wi0y
TI PMtaLety / a rv YICNL) | OHeT's vey UIPopmy duly, Aod a>. 1
. Pee cote’ - ' SUoWWISNIpPY "HT LNW
x , OP cco : a44¢ ‘9 vuy | ote
Ss ; (SUH wMaySut Oo ¢, HRed 9S)—"SUON NPIpP sayiQ Ss WO PUL 9494 19}U3 “B UINOW) Z SouY Ppy é
TUtery ] 44 tt asusdny osu eo, TF LEO @ 1444 4 saouvs somo yejoy ce
be QIAV? testy 4 gt 1>S y | é
oo CVO, BVIOQWYSD
. (aanjeu vicis) seounos 42410 @
- < ee (4 MINP2YIXS) eworuw wes Z
=~ (27nudy) LIUNIO (Q @MPI4N2S) Ayso.J0Id po BBUeYDxa JO aes 9
—' ; $ De ow oWoOy—asuadsa pSasahuy .. 4 (3 IINPIyW2S) awosu Ssausng ¢
BR S777) 4444 Sane eye, RIN MLL EY J/# A> (1) PINPIYIS) sjom1) 1089) 4S9°p ‘Sdryssaujed
$ Aywduad [PUdsaug ‘$unjeAosu pue byuds SelpnuueK pue SuMsudy °
4 $ ®Wwodu: (C30) puc 201s @a@<44 4 awodu 1SQs9}us peyO, Mees Bates ie
cates *- $ . SIICS PPAQUADH - >
ee ee e $ ouyOsed jrowny pue a2e1S oeee oem — —<——/—
eee . $ a} sa OU 'Sorey -_ . oe . -- ceeneeegeeeEeeeED
SoCo C 4444 (Suenerpan sop suogonAsur ——. - e e = a
ow FS PUL Let py) SONY Od way t atenaiiabieeene
Q 2/4212 4 (a 73x
DAM SPS e Gre Cederctliys Pry Giaked pO Dweu) Wsesapu ¢
| “det D942 104 SUH Gays OVS) USL LLY 4910 Z z om . me ~* «6 o «
i a 444 4(p] pur 91 souy py v) SPUspiaip wo, Z
— ~s ; “SMO NG IUOD YSst>D wo, ft —, MApyENbDUOU pryOy
s+ & eeveeeee ! ! os
(ued 40 Wry) spUudpiip Jutjynenduoy pe
* j (0497 U4) $$9j JOU JMq) OUEWY 1
—F $101} 2}SU1995 HIM; as; UIE; OOS 2NANS QE
7 (921usd}") | Ju 4unenw peyo)
‘239 ‘“Suapino Aduow ‘S¥I9D Aun, ust--—-11Se4 ~"SUOIINgGIiayuos
re 7 ae < WOHE Ua LOTR etas 20g SHO INAS UE 4
ws JO FP GM cS Op cee Wid fs rue). ape S - 7
QAPUMPAULLLAEY / pt Of
ek ie ee ee WL iv t sviry p "
< oR RTO Gen i ee a a en ;
(Surrioud DUCE A ernie SEIS le cs ac ee ee .
opm) Susu. “pe Daptaet v
ju) su PUL usp “yh YU4v~hlO Z (aaked pO Jeuevu) SPU MAIN Jushjyend et
— - a } 10d 6 auy po’ a 49A0 Aye ole ape poyiny iq Be “ » ba Zo voneurjtag
Sirupy ue etoepeaad SCAU BS de su) T
PL ued OF , ty
“MOR INPIP saaey ayer coed sOf SUOH IML yO Q Bed ANS ‘4DA0 WO Baug orneay ory VY MUUN NON) GF DY 19004 ; $93
C&D Deed ld Porgraay fepre sig eJtghies Plate a °O 40 84) at pA UNOA 40 7
NOAM PLOY wees Me UP UNsuEAR: : SUNG? 0069 Aue ak <=
!
JOU IOC) PY Par coger ure Ny- “ot uvdsd peyuap Puc erapray
“UO PIAPIP paepurys so W790, rey
OSM JOU OP MOA pt Apuo a, SHON INP. Pp pozituayy “ALLY ‘sobcm uct)
——— _— =
, SUQHNQHIOP tied pepdes pue NUCKejUCy g
| inoue ssoig y
SUOTING! SIG 49NI9 pue Spuspiaig
‘29 “SOHCILS
49NJO S*DINOS p]C wiGay oWOduU] “HWANVd
——- <_—_ re
: staad4 He SUL Ge FU peta we vty SUP CAML Propo oy oe OP pO do umn ae
| z
$: “ $ | ~~ og
"Vs -Puacdap Pn | : thw . autem ©" ony pp c01ow 100098 79 | 24. 0 U.. Oye feet Ba
P<. bok > foe * , Pp’ py te va ~ Sua ~ . - cape “ —~ J “ >A > a md ad % Gi (Suorje, | : (QNpayrs "OLE Pepaaus: ddEe06 G2 Gt) riwveaee?
ZeILY C9CL OFrol uvoy
+ $
= * 3.™~ ‘
T 26ed ‘gE oul YO pawyes> bbe spusdap 105 Ajuo wjojdiuu- & ~* pipeluuo a .
eal
.
-_——
>
at
——_=-- -
— Oem: eee es a a ae
day Oe.- : 7 wre
- te — ines : ; 10) meds ‘st lwo “EEVIONY BOT “Smt SUTROlAVAS Wao ssisogs
Mm ORO TFET $NONINGID 110i .
oe ee
omen : Ki ra. Wwi0s re
\\ Poa er Ce, SHOIGMIDED 6621
Sinerraserwaie dowvenini 662)
2 aie $501 IiOd ?
!
j
; NOLL NV Ien8 / $501 astensy>
¥ a! Te Paws oe 990 BHO Wids ; ele fa SROMADEND Wi
| MEV) herd bieud
aan remy: KXKKX TNONADSINOD Would
sh rie TM AN HOW hve . __ SMAIWHD CITINYOSD Jew
‘ pinGands) $d 8 WENAOD INJWISIANI T ONAG 8ddavD
By ; TAGIND) ANOWIIT tied 1D wave
. PR aa = Tit ates 9 int
(BWOdHd5! sav Clend at $450) God
oO NOUVEVdl¥s EVA WOON DoOpS ror
36M une ON CRLUINM/I8I43 ALINI= >
ONINWED ONY ALON? \ $iNOI 208 14d
OnmmiOl> D3d108s SEOs DEVE diebarnia¥e
$2144N$ ONY $1001 Tivws
ee | TING Wwne StiOus7 NON |
‘ . SNOILDINGIG Y3IHLO Bind ond
“cl t077 Felie7/ TsFsiirw Wids SNOLNJ3INOD
ssi 7ee.6 UTS LAa G30 19) G)« Wis
r or jn ‘DMI $5010 fur WE Sead
eliy 7
$3001S inaniuveda | Le WIT ih { SAR7Y "SMI AG CiSenanas Fant
oe a eoes7 iineced Whaat
ONT itv
IN7C7 YWdIRT FIWAT TION IS oS FAC SMI INDDDDV © Malved
$NVO) INDaNIWASN CCOF iz Giw 0d Wares
ree L(y’ saieOir or
VrLFzZ J PUY _— eS 7VO,
20YC.90"
(Oivd WOH/A Ol) 1S3821NI
ACW EE GM EWZLA ~_ fel Wi01
al
Go| 892 loa sor CL =70 LEI | =
J
—
-—
x : J 7 ODF PATONG ws
Oa oF eolez ¢) /- We OlInw = ALsOa4 WWNOSEIS oD) wad Oe AAWISY, J vs
oy AlalsOus WWNOSSIS U4 )> a et x71 «ae VIA
Tix | Tse WOON W201 PBs yOlS7 | ow AIwWAvy a
ON CS vices, a s2iws waa Ca C7 oar ty
OG A co ce , Ar coo? HOS VO WW an .. & 2 oe ce iv f 109 Le
Gus Of VWELur arene wooo | | o'007— ‘0
ws val : Weewss S3xvil saved Wweidis ; sv e300 [) Wo ne
as | 31NOIN9S NOINGIO
‘ON “OTS “OS — ssundav :
*. - ( aa. ee
a soe ==... —_
53761 aaa uvaxaw.
ra
~!
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.