Amicus Curiae Brief — DeFunis v. Odegaard

Supreme Court brief1974

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

i

|

a”

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

CasEs:

Arizona ex rel. Merrill v. Turtle,

413 F.2d 683 (9th Cir. 1969) 7 8

Barta v. Oglala Sioux Tribe,

259 F.2d 553 (8th Cir. 1958) 8

Bolling v.

347 US. 497 (1954) 10

Elk v. Wilkins,

112 US. 94 a (ee) 11

peg: fa wre! 674 (10th Cir. 1971) 11

Kennerly v. District Court,

a0 08, 423 no gene 5

Mancari v.

359 F. Supp 3 585 (D.C_D.NM.

Pyramid Lake Tribe v. Morton,

BF, Supp. 252 (D.ODC. 1972) _.......

449 ‘at b6r (oth Cir. 1971)

Sineacies. ids bettadane

(he F 808 (E.D. Wash. 1966),

yt affirmed UE, 200 (1006)

State v. Doxtater,

47 Wis. 278, 2 N.W. 439 (1879)

Talton v. M

163 Us a6 (1896)

shag ur Hickel,

US. 598 a

24 F. Cas. 937 0. 14, 495) (c.c. Tenn. 1834),

118 U.S. 375 (1886)

United Statés v. Rogers,

< ne US. (4 How.) 567 (1846)

Post v. Arizona Tax Commission,

_ mn U8. 6 (1965)

Williams v. Lee,

358 us. 217 (1959)

31 US. (6 Pet.) 515 (1832)

SraTruTes AND TREATIES:

Treaty of September 17, 1778 (7 Stat. 13) sper

SUSC. §3 ... oe

Crossland, Minority Access to College (1971) ......... ,

26 UBL SAR hire sicinerhem itr ihe ctibentidebhd a) AD

25 US.C. § 44-46 rence

25 US.C. §§ 81, 82, 82(a), 84. _ 10

25 USC. § 122 . iieceniraieserascicnidiee ae

25 US.C. § 231 > ccliyale< 30

25 USC. § 297 .......... é urevevecsicevenssee | AQ

S USC Wis) ee

25 USC. §§ 348, 391, 393 10

25 US.C. §§ 371-380 _, 10

25 US.C. § 472

25 US.C. §§ 1301-1303 8, 10

42 US.C. §§ 2200 et Seq. ae

Public Law 92-261 : “ 10

Texts AND OrHFR AUTHORITIES:

Anderson, K., et al, The Educational Achievement

ce Bae of Indian Affairs (1953)........... 4

Dery, Tae Seed teste ena es

cation (1969) : 4

Cicer sa i Sas Uo Otte

1970 Toledo L. Rev. 691 6

Cohen, F., Federal Indian Law (1942) .................. 6

Coombs, L., The Educational Disadvantage of the

American Indian Student (1970) 3

Fy ESE OT HA Sie bettants Coneduiaal

Havinghurst, R., Education of Indian Children and

iene United States Office of Education

Mayer, The Lawyers, Dell Publishing Co., 1966 ....

Note, The Indian: The Forgotten American, 81

Harv.L.Rev. 1818 (1968)

O’Neil, Preferential Admissions: izing Access

To Legal Education, 1970 Tolede Lee 691 ....

President Richard M. Nixon, Message to Congress,

July 8, 1970

i Centuries of Dishonor: Legal

pean eas the American Indian, 1970

Toledo L.Rev. 847

The Indian Battle for Self-Determination 58 Cal.

L. Rev. 445 (1970)

Victoria, De Indis et De Jure Belli Relectiones

(Trans. by John Pawley Bates (1917) ............

~

-_-— ee meee “

Page

Ju the Supreme Court ot the Cinited states

Ocroper Term, 1973

No. 73-235

Maxco DeF unis, et al.,

Petitioners,

Vv.

CHARLES ODEGAARD, President of the

University of Washington, et al.,

Respondents.

Upon Certiorari from the Judgment of the

Supreme Court of Washington

BRIEF FOR AMERICAN INDIAN LAW STUDENTS

ASSOCIATION, INC. AND AMERICAN INDIAN

LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, INC., AMICI CURIAE

INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE

This brief is submitted with consent of counsel for the

parties on behalf of the American Indian Law Students

Association, Inc., and the American Indian Lawyers

Association, Inc.

eee

te

Hid

ahs

aa

ie fi

Tat

La

an ae

We

Lae

iit: |

mel Haat

Bin es Ht Ht ith

Suh UY AY) SE lusdpypaagean ga anyeny

tie Ua ful suet 2

a Hr ; PES 3 E

S p43 Es 1 i

i

5 E38 35.

faa Went

3

is §.8 3

Head ealih

i ee

} a ibis

li

i

Hit

Soe e

Hee

aye

a

Ht

a ett al

e tp :

Me sail Ieee chi

&

:

i

s

sie

er. Le } |

Hf

eee

u giclee rt

Hil cee RRL BEE E> etre til

rc)

aitiy Ab

S

f

Hila

. ‘|

iat 33 -

ARR ST

Message to Congress,

i

%

J

2

t

R

E

.

EL]

=|

L

%

~

i

it

.

;

il

it i

Indians ha

69, 1178-1181.

a

int Hh

i

eitie,

PR Ep. 24 11

8 See, e.g., 25 U.B.C. §§ 13, 297.

9 See, eg., 25 U.S.C. §§ 231, permitting entry upon reserva-

tions to enforce health regulations.

10 Bee, e.g., 25 U.S.C. §§ 1301-03.

11 See, e.g., 25 U.S.C. §§ 305-309 (a).

‘12 Bee, e.g., 25 U.S.C. §§ 348, 391, 393.

13 Bee, eg., 25 U.S.C. §§ 81, 82, 82(a), 84, limiting contracts

without the apporval of the Secretary of the Interior.

14 Bee, e.g., 25 U.S.C. §§ 371-80, which requires the approval

of the Secretary of Interior in regard to many testamentary dis-

15 See, e.g., 25 U.S.C. § 122.

‘16 Cf. United States v. Rogers 45 U.S. (4 How.) 567 (1846).

1725 U.S.C. §472. This Court has granted certiorari in !

Mancari v. Morton 359 F.Supp. 585 (D.C.D.N.M., 1973) to de-

termine whether the Indian Preference statutes, 25 U.S.C. §§ 44-46, |

and 472 were amended by the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 and 1972,

42 U.S.C. §§ 2000 et seq. and Public Law 92-261.

- # Ht esa

Wi $2 Halts! ba

“U1

The

aint of

and in all

v.

1966

to

Indians

a

ii

el

i

mr ly

Hi aaa i aii + ia nt A

188 USC. §3.

ce

as

| uo KIdVigaqa

For the f SO submitted

that the decision of the Washington Supreme should

be affirmed and the case be dismissed.

Dated: January 31, 1974

Hersert Becker

Bagpara A, Fix

Bruce R. Greeny

Frep L. Racspae

By:

Bruce R. Greene

Of Counsel:

California Indian Services

Native American ts Fund

American Indian Law Coat

13

APPENDIX A

THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO

School of Law

1117 8. NE.

Albuquerque, N.M. 87106

Tel. (505) 277-4844

American Indian Law Center

Priue 8. DeLoria, Cuaries W. BuackwELL,

Director Associate in Law

Rosser L. Bannerr, Tosy F, Grossman,

Director of Special Projects Staff Director

January 28, 1974

Honorable Justices

Supreme Court of the United States

Washington, D.C.

|

|

i

: EF

in the program attend law throughout the

States. The program is a relatively new one in that it has

i 1967. Since that time there

been operational since J

ee ee (4) graduating classes from law schools.

Our figures show that there have been 86 Indian students

14

nf

pune

ag

bel

3

Fe

s BLT

fe

fet

’

its ae ui imu!

Tare oe A

&

rH.

3

| ee ieee

gay 23228] hae

Stee

a laa

ies aii

it GLEE ge g

a5 ted

SPT okt Pee

g

3

dFysanctby

pea

ae

g

he or

practice of law and ultimate-

t

uation the chances are ex

Semen.

pagan eg samp apa ample

9461 ‘IZ 3SNBny seujdry uoyssjuued AW

AANNOD OO3I0 NVS

Wi 301490 ‘WaldNivd

WINUC a1 WO DVeNe-AUVLON

Xia “‘V VaveUva

* Wat Widiadd

*BTUutOSTTeO

Soptpuocosg 38 Hl6T ‘Auenaqey jo Aep pz

STyuQ ow aTOJeq O09 UATOMS puke peqTuosqns

OUSWOU ANNOAA

*eTusJosTTeg Sopfpuocosyg 4e Hl6T ‘2 Auwenuqeay uo paegnoexg

*qoeum090 pue

anaq st BufoBZesojy ayqg qeyuq Aunfued jo Aqteued wsepun suepoaep |

“nl6T ‘2 Adenaqgeyg uo

eTUIOJTTeO SopTpuocosy 4B Trew seqeqs peaTuN euy UT pegtsodep predeud

ATTN eBeqsod TyTew azzte yaTM pue peTees usyQ sem sdoTsaue yoRg

hOTQ@6 UCgBuTYSEem faTQQe~a>g

G6TQ6 UogBuTYseM feTQ9eeg SuTPTTNG e30H OOF

uogZutysem jo Ayytsaeatuyn YALSAATAS % GNOWVIG ‘ALLSIOAT

BSuTPltng uofzeuyspupwpy 2TT DYUSEGNYSLS *S DIVHO

NOS'TIM °G SaWVS NOSYSAI “TI STAT

IVYSNSD ARNYOLLV ‘NOLYOD aavIS GNOWVIG agsor

:SMOTTOJ se ATaeATQoOedSar sesserppe Yyons YyoRSs OF pesseuppe ‘uaqse

-srey peweu sesseuppe yore doJ edoTeause oyeuedes e& ut joazayy satdoo

aeayuy BupToetd Aq aeetung fotuy ‘*ouy SuoTyepfoossy suadmey] uetpuy uedyT

-Jowy pue ‘our ‘uot eToOOssy sguepnygs Me] UBTpUL UedOTUueWy UOJ Jaytug

aug PeAUesS [ ‘“BpfusosTTeg ‘oVetq ues Jo Aqunog ayy uy pefotduea

pue aZe jo sueek gt wzeao *saqeqg peqgTug eyuq JO usZzTqQTo e& we JT

:sfkes pue sasodep ‘usoms AtTnp Buteq ‘ouzewoy auUucAZ

‘

TIVW AG SOIAWTS AO LIAVGIddV

aa ngenowsHnonET D GD

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.