Petition for Rehearing — Michael Anthony Glover, Petitioner v. Georgia
Supreme Court briefFeb 7, 2025
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
No. 24-5999
IN THRE
SUPREME. CouRT OF THE UNITED STATES
—<
MICHABL ANTHONY GLovVER= PETITIONER,
VS
|THE STATE OF GEORGIA-RESPONDENT.
-
ON PETITION FoR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO
THE COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA
— X
PETITION FoR REREARING
Michae! Anthony Clover
GDc: eaao [17|30
PhilliPs State Prison
9985 ———
Buford, Georgia ZoSl4
Pe Manes Didi se
GROUNDS FoR REHEARING
WHETHER CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS rn
PETITIONER'S Position WAS SUBJECTED TO
CUSTODIAL ENTERROGATION
EN THE
SUPREME CouRT OF THE UNITED STATES
| No. 24-S8399
MICHAEL ANTHONY GLoVER- PETITIONER,
NS.
THE STATE 0 F GEORGIA- RESPONDENT.
_PETITION FoR REHEARING
Petitrenerc Michael Antheny ‘ 4
ahd Pursuant +o pule 44 ef the Supreme couch af the
United States, Petitions this court for rehearing ef the _
denial ef the Pebbhon for cori af Cerhorari entered
en Tanuary 13,2025. this Pet tion for Rehearing
____tontaings ““... other substantial grounds that was
____no+ Previously Presented” th the erigingl Pekhon Fer
— leerHorart, Peb poner Further shetes thet the Couch
Ey ae FE
— Froth Seacorbided, hy Sie sraeck och eat-nadsonl_———--
NmaPorfence euith censhtuhonel tmPlicabions,
1, THE CouRT SHoulLD RECongiDER THE PETITION
Tn 1994, the Supreme Court of the United States Passed _
down +he decision th Stansbury Vv. California, SUS. 318,
NY Sve 1S 2ECI9G 4), rn the Shanshury decision the Couch
Stated that?
ce
bear exPon the custe dy tssue tf Ahey
ave conveyed, by word or deed, te the
Individual being gueshoned. ai the se
belie-€s ave relevant enly +o the extent
they esould affeer hou 6 ree sondble Peeson
tn the Position of - :
| questened would gauge the breath ot
his er her ' Freedom of ochion.
ee, Stansbury V. Cali Cornig SUS. 318,325 WY Sich
1526 153001994)
2
iresearch tn both Federal and State courts of Various
States ena has net found any Similac Cases relahye
to the issues athand and the Product eF the Pelion
For CerHorarietehere during questioning the Mn aividurgl
NS being told by the Police thathe is a Possible susPect —
CB y two rd) end Collects DWA Samples chile been queshened
Gnd before he is released (By deed) of whether Miranda —
—____inghtS ave required and whether an individual ts +emPorary
In custody until the Police collects his DNA SamPles,
This ts an tissue of naoHonegl tmPortante anieF
great gravity and Concerns both For the Puble
______linteres+ and util guide lower Courts on the issues
e+ hand,
~~
| Many lower Courts cited the Ftansloury case but
hene ePined en the “eFFicerts Knowledge er belies
thet may bear uPon the custody issue f€ they are
____ Cenveyed, by tweard ey deed to the tndividual being
_____ Guestioned.” The court of ppPpeals of Ce rg ig
acknowledges thot the investigater —Cenveyed” to
| Peth-bioner hat he was.e Suspect tn She Case when
___ they steed thet “witheugh Clover eas bold thot he
aso Suspect in the case." This Sheuld no+ have
delecmine whether Peltiener was {n custody forthe
| 6o2 C1966) enumerated vightS, Mirtnda wes decided
n early $iXty-hineCG4) years age and modern day law
ee ____@nfercement Personnels uses neuly Police racbes -ba
CVaol'd in-formin g Su spects ef their Constitubenal rights
esPecrally Hf the Suspect 13 tgneran+ ef his rights or
1$ uneducated. Miranda needs to be revisited and be
eXPanded +o where the individual t§ the Primaary sus Pect
whether he is formally arrested ov released ofler
—_______int+erroga-bon by the Police,
2 CRIMIvAL DERENDAWTS IN PETITIGNER'S
POSITION WAS SUBFECTED To CUSTODIAL
INTERRO CATION
PetiHaner Glover Poss +o this court ‘that ence
Gd vise the SusPect ef his er hec Miranda rights end
the Sus Pect Knoteingly end Voluntarily waives these cights.
|
See Yorhocough Vv. Alvarado, S4/ U.S. 652, 661-63, 124 S.ch,
____ 2)40 (2004). "The Parties agree thet Ped toner Glover
______ was never advised of his Minnde rights. $e, the enly
______ Guestion for the Court +o answer 1S whether Pebhoner
| The answer to this guestion “dePends en whether
under the totaly ef the circumstances, a reqgsonable
thet he would net Feel Free bo leave." see, Cincted
G.
totes Vi MDaweil 250 B.3a.\3S4 362 Citheie, Zool),
The Eleventh elreuit teurt of wpPeals has stated that
é
the fest-for custody ¢s ebsechye! the actual,
Subsechive helreFs of the defendent andthe interviewing
OF EN Cer on ewhether the defendant was free +o leave
are trrelevant” See, Linited States V. Moya, 74 F3a.
17,116 CuThete. 1996), “PUInder the eblective Standard,
+he reasenable Persen rem whose Perspective *cus: y is
defined is @ reasanable innecent Person. ra CemPhasis
added). “hp defendant *$_in custe dy forthe PurPoses of
Miranda cohen there has been @ ‘formal arrest or restraint _
on Freedom of mevement o£ the degree associated with
“|
Ciith cir. 2006) Cqueting Californie vi Beblee 4163 u,s 121, —
___ti2s€1983)), The guesten ef whether Pebitienee
Glover was tn Custody during his wnterragation Yaus
—fe@etss a+ tohether a defendant has Shewn thera
reaSanable innocent Persen Facing the totality ef
Chreumstances at issue in an ebjecHVe manner would
have felt he or she tucas unable to leave the
intervegcabon,
The ‘64 tal bic path ”
our: d } @ Civcu
_____|Mterregation. Bur lawer courts hawe tdents Fred
Several specific Faciers For ConSigerah'on including
twhether 4 defendant tS in the Familiar and
Comfortable Surroundings ef bis er her heme er in
CG more -tyPieally Custodigl environment Such aS G Police
Station er Patel car, see. stotes vi Broun HAIR 3a
1330, B47 CUT Cir, 200C) wheter “the of Eicers
brandished weapons, touched the SusPect, er used
language ero -bone that indicated that comPliance eith
the efFicers could be compelled,” tinited states V.
Street 472 B.34.1258, 1309 (ith ci. 2006), the
______|durahion ef the queshening, statements made
\ \ . a Ee 7 .
perirnass daving nuctlinnine mad ALG gelitome
oF the tyferviewee @t+the end ef jhe
4,
—_____.Guesthioning, See. Hewes y. Fields S65 U.S H99 ,
$155 132 Sich 1181 C2012), internal eMations emttea),
“\
an d whether o SusPect was “Unambiguous \y
______ladvisedees+that he ts ree te leave and is not in
»)
Fed. APPX. 856, 850 Cit ete, 2013).
Canc) usion
The Petition Fer Rehearing Should be
Sranted,
This24T 3 U(r | =
Sianedl &
TJ
Michael Anthany Glaver
EVcH!@eao NIZIZO
PLilliPs Stele Pes San
DISS \N. Rock Quarry Ka |
_ Buford Georgia 30s19
lO.
CERTIFICATE OF GooD FAITH
| I, Michael Anthony Glover de hereby certify
that +the tsthin ond feregeing, Peripton Far
______ Rehearing *s been Filed tn Geed Faith and no+
for +he Purposes ef delay but Petitioner
believes the tssues Presented are neHonal
mi Portonce.
| Executed, thes 24) day ef Tamuary 2025,
f..__ »® Z
Signedl Az been flo ——>
Michael Anthony Glever
GDckieeoo WZI3ZO
Philips state Prison
2939 W. Rack Quarry RA,
Buford, Geo rg) 305719
Petitioner Pro-se.
No, 24-S 399
IN THE
SUPREME CouRT OF THE UNITED STATES
_——_———
MICHAEL ANTHONY GLoVER- PETITIONER
WS.
THE STATE OF GEORGIA- RES PON DENT
bse
PROOF OF SERVICE.
Michoel Anthony Glover
GDcH a0ce¢ 1171306
PLNLPS Stote Prison
ZGBTW, Rock Quarry Ra.
Yel Honer Pro-Se
TN THE SUPREME CoukT OF THE UNITED STATES — _
No. 24-$9.99
MICHAEL ANTHONY GLoVER- PETITIONER,
NS
THE STATE OF GEGRGIA-RESPGND ENT.
ee ——y
PRooF OF SERVICE,
2, Michael Anthony Glover do declare thet on this date,
— Tanuiary 24,2025 as ¢ uired by Supreme Court Rule 29,
tt have served the enclosed PETiTiew FoR REHEAKING
—__1@n_ ach Party +o the ghewve Preceeding or that Partys
Counsel, Gnd on &very other Person vequired -te be served, by —
___dePesitng cn envelePe conta thi ng- the aheve documents tn
the Uni fed States mail PrePerly « ly addressed toe €ach ef
then, ana tultth Firs+ Class Po stage P repos d Sr delivery
_ tatthin Seven C1) ¢glendarc A ay $
the names Gnd addresses of those served Gre as
Follows ”
Ps.
Cynthia as Prdcnas, esq,
Chief Assistant Distric+ Abborney
66] Mulberry S-ree+
Macon, Georsiq 3\29]
ChristoPher M Carr, esq,
R+torney General, State oF Georg!
Georgi'g DePartment o © Laus
L1O CaPprtel Square, Sw.
h-Hoan £46 £6 rGh 30339
see 23 U.8.¢. 1746.
Executed an tn. Quyth
a
Michael Anthe ny Glover
GNcH! C006 ])ZI3C
PhuliPs State Prison
2989 W. Rock Quarry RA,
Buford, Georgie 30519
Peli ener, Pro-se
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.