Petition for Rehearing — Michael Anthony Glover, Petitioner v. Georgia

Supreme Court briefFeb 7, 2025

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

No. 24-5999

IN THRE

SUPREME. CouRT OF THE UNITED STATES

—<

MICHABL ANTHONY GLovVER= PETITIONER,

VS

|THE STATE OF GEORGIA-RESPONDENT.

-

ON PETITION FoR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO

THE COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA

— X

PETITION FoR REREARING

Michae! Anthony Clover

GDc: eaao [17|30

PhilliPs State Prison

9985 ———

Buford, Georgia ZoSl4

Pe Manes Didi se

GROUNDS FoR REHEARING

WHETHER CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS rn

PETITIONER'S Position WAS SUBJECTED TO

CUSTODIAL ENTERROGATION

EN THE

SUPREME CouRT OF THE UNITED STATES

| No. 24-S8399

MICHAEL ANTHONY GLoVER- PETITIONER,

NS.

THE STATE 0 F GEORGIA- RESPONDENT.

_PETITION FoR REHEARING

Petitrenerc Michael Antheny ‘ 4

ahd Pursuant +o pule 44 ef the Supreme couch af the

United States, Petitions this court for rehearing ef the _

denial ef the Pebbhon for cori af Cerhorari entered

en Tanuary 13,2025. this Pet tion for Rehearing

____tontaings ““... other substantial grounds that was

____no+ Previously Presented” th the erigingl Pekhon Fer

— leerHorart, Peb poner Further shetes thet the Couch

Ey ae FE

— Froth Seacorbided, hy Sie sraeck och eat-nadsonl_———--

NmaPorfence euith censhtuhonel tmPlicabions,

1, THE CouRT SHoulLD RECongiDER THE PETITION

Tn 1994, the Supreme Court of the United States Passed _

down +he decision th Stansbury Vv. California, SUS. 318,

NY Sve 1S 2ECI9G 4), rn the Shanshury decision the Couch

Stated that?

ce

bear exPon the custe dy tssue tf Ahey

ave conveyed, by word or deed, te the

Individual being gueshoned. ai the se

belie-€s ave relevant enly +o the extent

they esould affeer hou 6 ree sondble Peeson

tn the Position of - :

| questened would gauge the breath ot

his er her ' Freedom of ochion.

ee, Stansbury V. Cali Cornig SUS. 318,325 WY Sich

1526 153001994)

2

iresearch tn both Federal and State courts of Various

States ena has net found any Similac Cases relahye

to the issues athand and the Product eF the Pelion

For CerHorarietehere during questioning the Mn aividurgl

NS being told by the Police thathe is a Possible susPect —

CB y two rd) end Collects DWA Samples chile been queshened

Gnd before he is released (By deed) of whether Miranda —

—____inghtS ave required and whether an individual ts +emPorary

In custody until the Police collects his DNA SamPles,

This ts an tissue of naoHonegl tmPortante anieF

great gravity and Concerns both For the Puble

______linteres+ and util guide lower Courts on the issues

e+ hand,

~~

| Many lower Courts cited the Ftansloury case but

hene ePined en the “eFFicerts Knowledge er belies

thet may bear uPon the custody issue f€ they are

____ Cenveyed, by tweard ey deed to the tndividual being

_____ Guestioned.” The court of ppPpeals of Ce rg ig

acknowledges thot the investigater —Cenveyed” to

| Peth-bioner hat he was.e Suspect tn She Case when

___ they steed thet “witheugh Clover eas bold thot he

aso Suspect in the case." This Sheuld no+ have

delecmine whether Peltiener was {n custody forthe

| 6o2 C1966) enumerated vightS, Mirtnda wes decided

n early $iXty-hineCG4) years age and modern day law

ee ____@nfercement Personnels uses neuly Police racbes -ba

CVaol'd in-formin g Su spects ef their Constitubenal rights

esPecrally Hf the Suspect 13 tgneran+ ef his rights or

1$ uneducated. Miranda needs to be revisited and be

eXPanded +o where the individual t§ the Primaary sus Pect

whether he is formally arrested ov released ofler

—_______int+erroga-bon by the Police,

2 CRIMIvAL DERENDAWTS IN PETITIGNER'S

POSITION WAS SUBFECTED To CUSTODIAL

INTERRO CATION

PetiHaner Glover Poss +o this court ‘that ence

Gd vise the SusPect ef his er hec Miranda rights end

the Sus Pect Knoteingly end Voluntarily waives these cights.

|

See Yorhocough Vv. Alvarado, S4/ U.S. 652, 661-63, 124 S.ch,

____ 2)40 (2004). "The Parties agree thet Ped toner Glover

______ was never advised of his Minnde rights. $e, the enly

______ Guestion for the Court +o answer 1S whether Pebhoner

| The answer to this guestion “dePends en whether

under the totaly ef the circumstances, a reqgsonable

thet he would net Feel Free bo leave." see, Cincted

G.

totes Vi MDaweil 250 B.3a.\3S4 362 Citheie, Zool),

The Eleventh elreuit teurt of wpPeals has stated that

é

the fest-for custody ¢s ebsechye! the actual,

Subsechive helreFs of the defendent andthe interviewing

OF EN Cer on ewhether the defendant was free +o leave

are trrelevant” See, Linited States V. Moya, 74 F3a.

17,116 CuThete. 1996), “PUInder the eblective Standard,

+he reasenable Persen rem whose Perspective *cus: y is

defined is @ reasanable innecent Person. ra CemPhasis

added). “hp defendant *$_in custe dy forthe PurPoses of

Miranda cohen there has been @ ‘formal arrest or restraint _

on Freedom of mevement o£ the degree associated with

“|

Ciith cir. 2006) Cqueting Californie vi Beblee 4163 u,s 121, —

___ti2s€1983)), The guesten ef whether Pebitienee

Glover was tn Custody during his wnterragation Yaus

—fe@etss a+ tohether a defendant has Shewn thera

reaSanable innocent Persen Facing the totality ef

Chreumstances at issue in an ebjecHVe manner would

have felt he or she tucas unable to leave the

intervegcabon,

The ‘64 tal bic path ”

our: d } @ Civcu

_____|Mterregation. Bur lawer courts hawe tdents Fred

Several specific Faciers For ConSigerah'on including

twhether 4 defendant tS in the Familiar and

Comfortable Surroundings ef bis er her heme er in

CG more -tyPieally Custodigl environment Such aS G Police

Station er Patel car, see. stotes vi Broun HAIR 3a

1330, B47 CUT Cir, 200C) wheter “the of Eicers

brandished weapons, touched the SusPect, er used

language ero -bone that indicated that comPliance eith

the efFicers could be compelled,” tinited states V.

Street 472 B.34.1258, 1309 (ith ci. 2006), the

______|durahion ef the queshening, statements made

\ \ . a Ee 7 .

perirnass daving nuctlinnine mad ALG gelitome

oF the tyferviewee @t+the end ef jhe

4,

—_____.Guesthioning, See. Hewes y. Fields S65 U.S H99 ,

$155 132 Sich 1181 C2012), internal eMations emttea),

“\

an d whether o SusPect was “Unambiguous \y

______ladvisedees+that he ts ree te leave and is not in

»)

Fed. APPX. 856, 850 Cit ete, 2013).

Canc) usion

The Petition Fer Rehearing Should be

Sranted,

This24T 3 U(r | =

Sianedl &

TJ

Michael Anthany Glaver

EVcH!@eao NIZIZO

PLilliPs Stele Pes San

DISS \N. Rock Quarry Ka |

_ Buford Georgia 30s19

lO.

CERTIFICATE OF GooD FAITH

| I, Michael Anthony Glover de hereby certify

that +the tsthin ond feregeing, Peripton Far

______ Rehearing *s been Filed tn Geed Faith and no+

for +he Purposes ef delay but Petitioner

believes the tssues Presented are neHonal

mi Portonce.

| Executed, thes 24) day ef Tamuary 2025,

f..__ »® Z

Signedl Az been flo ——>

Michael Anthony Glever

GDckieeoo WZI3ZO

Philips state Prison

2939 W. Rack Quarry RA,

Buford, Geo rg) 305719

Petitioner Pro-se.

No, 24-S 399

IN THE

SUPREME CouRT OF THE UNITED STATES

_——_———

MICHAEL ANTHONY GLoVER- PETITIONER

WS.

THE STATE OF GEORGIA- RES PON DENT

bse

PROOF OF SERVICE.

Michoel Anthony Glover

GDcH a0ce¢ 1171306

PLNLPS Stote Prison

ZGBTW, Rock Quarry Ra.

Yel Honer Pro-Se

TN THE SUPREME CoukT OF THE UNITED STATES — _

No. 24-$9.99

MICHAEL ANTHONY GLoVER- PETITIONER,

NS

THE STATE OF GEGRGIA-RESPGND ENT.

ee ——y

PRooF OF SERVICE,

2, Michael Anthony Glover do declare thet on this date,

— Tanuiary 24,2025 as ¢ uired by Supreme Court Rule 29,

tt have served the enclosed PETiTiew FoR REHEAKING

—__1@n_ ach Party +o the ghewve Preceeding or that Partys

Counsel, Gnd on &very other Person vequired -te be served, by —

___dePesitng cn envelePe conta thi ng- the aheve documents tn

the Uni fed States mail PrePerly « ly addressed toe €ach ef

then, ana tultth Firs+ Class Po stage P repos d Sr delivery

_ tatthin Seven C1) ¢glendarc A ay $

the names Gnd addresses of those served Gre as

Follows ”

Ps.

Cynthia as Prdcnas, esq,

Chief Assistant Distric+ Abborney

66] Mulberry S-ree+

Macon, Georsiq 3\29]

ChristoPher M Carr, esq,

R+torney General, State oF Georg!

Georgi'g DePartment o © Laus

L1O CaPprtel Square, Sw.

h-Hoan £46 £6 rGh 30339

see 23 U.8.¢. 1746.

Executed an tn. Quyth

a

Michael Anthe ny Glover

GNcH! C006 ])ZI3C

PhuliPs State Prison

2989 W. Rock Quarry RA,

Buford, Georgie 30519

Peli ener, Pro-se

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.