Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Palani Karupaiyan, Petitioner v. Lee Solomon, et al.

Supreme Court briefMay 16, 2023

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

23°

P,JV

In The

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED

STATES

PALANI KARUPAIYAN, et al

Petitioners

LEE SOLOMON, et al - Respondents

On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari

to the United States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit before judgment is

entered in that Court (23-1788)

PETITION FOR A WRIT OF

CERTIORARI

Palani Karupaiyan.

Pro se, Petitioner,

1326 W William St,

Room#2.

Philadelphia, PA 19132

212-470-2048(M)

filed

may 1 6 2023

Questions Presented

Petitioner’s prayed reliefs were

ii)

iii)

iv)

vi)

National importance of having the US

Supreme Court decide or conflict with

USSC ruling, or importance of similarly

situated over millions of citizens or the first

impression is raised at USSC.

Petitioners’ property rights under 42USC§

1982 and Hindu Successive Act were denied

when USSC ruled in

Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc., 396

US 229-S.Ct 1969@237

“Section1982 f42 USC§19821 covers the

right "to inherit, purchase, lease, sell. hold,

and convey real and personal property."

Local Govts/Foreign

Govt

violating,

Parents rights (14th amendment) which were

ruled by USSC under Troxel v. Granville.

530 US 57 and Washington v. Glucksberg,

521 US 702, 720.

Local Govts illegally taken away Petitioners

property without Jury trial.

Local Govts illegally issued arrestfedl

warrant without Jury trial.

NJ Court violated the Indian Family Court

Order

Further/additionally Petitioner’s prayed over

30 reliefs were as Writ of Mandamus or Prohibition or

alternative so the questions were part of three test

condition requirement of the Writs.

II.

Parties to the Proceeding

Petitioners: Palani Karupaiyan, PP, RP,

Santhosh Subramaniyan

RESPONDENTS: L. NAGANDA, individually and in

his official capacity as Owner of Naga Law Firm;

NAGA LAW FIRM; J. RAMYA; P. JAYABALAN; J.

RANJEETHKUMAR; ARUL THIRUMURUGU;

ATLANTIC REALTY DEVELOPMENT CORP;

MIDDLESEX MANAGEMENT INC; OAK TREE

VILLAGE; DAVID HALPERN, individually and in

his official capacity as CEO, Owner of Atlantic

Realty Development Corp, Middlesex Management,

Oaktree Village; D&G TOWING; GLENN

STRAUBE, individually and in his official capacity

as owner of D&G Towing;

MARCIA SILVA, individually and in her official

capacity as Judge of the Superior Court, Middlesex

County, NJ; JUDGE CRAIG CORSON, individually

and in his official capacity as Judge of the Superior

Court, Middlesex County, NJ;

JERALD COUNCIL, individually and in his official

capacity as Judge of the Superior Court, Middlesex,

NJ;

STUART RABNER, individually and in his official

capacity as Chief Justice of Supreme Court of NJ;

JAYNEE LA VECCHIA, individually and in her

official capacity as Justice of Supreme Court of NJ;

BARRY T. ALBIN, individually and in his official

capacity as Justice of the Supreme Court of NJ;

ANNE M. PATTERSON, individually and in her

official capacity as Justice of the Supreme Court of

NJ;

FAUSTINO J. FERNANDEZ-VINA, individually and

in his official capacity as Justice of the Supreme

Ill

Court of NJ; LEE A. SOLOMON, individually and in

his official capacity as Justice of the Supreme Court

of NJ; WALTER F. TIMPONE, individually and in

his official capacity as Justice of the Supreme Court

of NJ;

ALLISON E. ACCURSO, individually and in her

official capacity as Judge of Appellate Division of NJ;

PATRICK DEALMEIDA, individually and in his

official capacity as Judge of the Appellate Division of

NJ;

JOSEPH L. YANNOTTI, INDIVIDUALLY and in his

official capacity as Judge of the Appellate Division of

NJ;

GLENN GRANT, individually and in his official

capacity as Administrative Director of the Courts of

the State of New Jersey;

COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX;

STATE OF NEW JERSEY; TOWNSHIP OF

EDISON,

Sam Joshi individually and in his official capacity as

Mayor of Edison Township of NJ , Rajesh Khullar,

Raman Khullar, Tania Khullar, Shalimar Group of

Restaurants

III.

Related Case(s)

USSC Docket 22-1100

Palani Karupaiyan v Township of Woodbridge et al.

(USCA-3rd Cir -22-2949)

IV.

Table of Contents

I. Questions Presented...........

II.

Parties to the Proceeding

III. Related Case(s)..................

IV. Table of Contents.............

Table of Authorities

VI. Petition for Writ(s) of Certiorari .... 1

VII. Opinion(s)/orders/Judgment(s)

BELOW (from Dist Court/USCA3)............ 1

VIII. Jurisdiction...................................... 1

IX. Constitutional and Statutory

Provisions involved................................... 2

Statement of the Case....................... 2

At District Court Proceeding...................... 2

At USCA 3rd Cir. Proceeding......................... 3

XI. Reasons for Granting the Writs the

Writ(s).......................................................... 3

Grant Children Custody, Invalidated

Judgement of divorce-JOD (App2.17),

Invalidating Final Restraining Orders FROs

App2.1,11, and Validate Indian family Court

Order App2.26,28......................................................... 3

Issue an order to Indian Supreme Court to

DISMISS AND CLOSE THE DOCKET IS OJASWA

PATHAK vs. UNION OF INDIA, Dkt#

W.P.(C)No.250/2019................................................. 4

c) Writ against NJ for......................................... 6

Order that NJ govt/Local Govt(s) and Chief

Justice of NJ Supreme Court should not

appoint/Promote NJ Supreme Court justice, NJ

appellate Court Judge, and Administrative

Director of the Courts of NJ Courts, any judicial

officers including Municipal Judges, and appoint

22 NJ Supreme Court Justices thru Collegium

Process. And Invalidate the NJ Supreme Court

justices/NJ appellate Judges who were

appointed/ promoted by NJ govt/NJ Supreme

Court Chief justice................................................... 6

LEFT BLNK.................................................. 9

Shared Children Custody and NJ should

not violate Parents disability in grating children

Custody..................................................................... 9

Acceptable form(s) of Child Support and

Save the child support money to Child need.......9

i) Family Properties inheritance to

Children, ii) No lawyer fee from family

properties, Disclose/open-to-public family Ct

lawyer fee...............................................................

NJ family Court records should not be

under seal and No Property matter/financial

matter disclosure discussed in Family Court. ..11

Writ against NJ Judicial authorities. ... 12

i) NJ Judicial Authorities involve in family

case should get mental fitness certificate yearly,

ii) NJ Judicial authorities’ Yearly Financial

disclosure Statement to be Open to public. iii)

NJ Judicial Authorities to file timesheet for every

15 minutes of their duty.................................. 12

Order NJ S.Ct to provide a copy of

Ramya’s Response brief................................. ,13

NJ S.Ct should not hire proxy peoples

India file case in Indian S.Ct to strike down the

Indian family law based on Petitioner Indian

family Court..................................................... 13

10. Left blank............................................... 14

AGAINST NJ.............................................................

11. i) Trial by Juries in family Courts, ii)

Strike down lawless family Court and create

Civil family law iii) Equal rights to men in

family Court..................................................... 14

12. Consolidate the NJ family Court (lawless,

kangaroo Court), NJ Law division civil Court

and Landlord/Tenant Court.

13. i) No gun carrying Police involve in family

matter, ii) No arrest to the people who need

medical treatment, iii) no township police

overtime

14. Wipeout the FROs/arrest/jailing records. 17

15. 15 is left blank........................................... 18

16. Deduct 20% from NJ Law makers to pay

the Petitioners loss............................................. 18

17. Move the Middlesex County’s Court and

Childsupport probation employees in to NJ

payroll.................................................................. 18

Vll

18. Order to cut 80% of federal funds to NJ

and its Local govt.............................................. 19

f) Writ(s) against Middlesex County, NJ..... 20

19. Middlesex County NJ to pay $42 million

dollar for collecting child support illegally....... 20

Against all Individual

defendants/respondents................................... 21

20. i) Jailing L. Naganda, P. Jayabalan; J.

Ranjeeth Kumar, Arul Thirumurugu, David

Halpern, Marcia Silva, Craig Corson, Jerald

Council, Stuart Rabner, Jaynee la Vecchia,

Barry t. Albin, Anne m. Patterson, Faustino j.

Fernandez-Vina, Lee a. Solomon, Walter f.

Timpone, Glenn Grant, Allison e. Accurso,

Patrick Dealmeida, Joseph 1. Yannotti for 25

years AND ii) protection/restraining order

against these Individuals and iii) Remove NJ

S.Ct Justices, NJ appellate/family Court Judges

defending the Petitioner and iii) Invalidate all

the orders signed by these NJ judicial

authorities

Writs against the Landlord respondents

21. Money Relief to Children by Landlord.... 22

22. Landlord to pay $100 million to Petitioner

for leasing inhabitability apartments......

23. Order that assign the ownership of

Landlord any and all business including Atlantic

reality, ownership of any and all rental

apartments, Landlord Halpern’s ownership

building to the Petitioners.........................

i) Writs against Lower Federal Courts......25

Vlll

24. Order lower Court (Dist Court) to run the

case as combined civil and criminal case when

remanded

25. Petitioner pray USSC that it should vacate

the Sua sponte dismissal of complaint............. 25

26. Appoint i) Guardian ad litem and/or pro

bono attorney..................................................... 26

Additional..............................................i...... 29

27. Order for each respondents to pay the

Petitioner(s) for each count of discrimination,

wrongdoings, injuries and so on....................... 29

28. Order the Local Govts and NJ Judicial

Authorities to pay as per the exhibits attached to

the Minor Petitioner marriage expense..

29. Petitioner(s) pray Order that each

defendant to pay for Petitioners’ effort, pain and

suffering, expenses, litigation cost or pain and

suffering by litigation.

Writs against Landlord respondents (ii) 32

30. Order the Landlord Atlantic to pay the

Petitioners Karupaiyan, RP and PP for violating

Conjugal/cohabiting rights.

31. Order the landlord to pay $250 per day for

illegally towing the camping Eurovan

32. Order the each NJ Judicial authorities, NJ

and Middlesex county respondents to pay $50

million for Children Education and marriage

expense

33. Order Ranjeeth to pay $600 million dollar

to the petitioner Karupaiyan

34. Order to i) NJ that NJ should

standardized the NJ’s Municipal Mayors and

councilmen's salary........................................... 34

35. Order that NJ Judicial authorities

respondents and Naga to pay $60 million per

months violating petitioners conjugal/cohabiting

rights...............................................................

36. Order NJ govt/Middlesex County, NJ

Judicial authorities and Landlord to pay

following money for false arrest/false jailing. ...34

37. Order that permanent protection order

against Khullars and Owner of Shalimar..... 35

38. Order that United States should enact

United States family....................................... 36

39. Prose based additional relief(s)............ 36

XII.

CONCLUSION

Table of Authorities

Cases

320 U.S. 796, 64 S.Ct. 263, 88 L.Ed. 480 (1943).

Babb v. Secretary. dept. Of veterans affairs. 992 F. 3d

1193 - USCA11- 2021....................................

Babb v. Wilkie. 140 S. Ct. 1168- Sup. Ct 2020

Bavron v. Trudeau. 702 F.2d 43, 45 (2d Cir. 1983)..26

Beck v. Beck, 432 A. 2d 63 - NJ: Supreme.............. 3

Bethel School District No. 403 Et Al. V. Fraser, A

Minor, et al. 478 U.S. 675 (1986)...................... 26

Board Of Education Of The Westside Community

Schools (Disk 66) et al. V. Mergens, By And

Through Her Next Friend, Mergens, Et. 496 U.S.

226 (1990),.............................................................. 27

Bovadiian v. Cigna Companies. 973 F. Supp. 500 Dist. Court, D. New Jersey 1997.......................... 31

CJLG v. Barr, 923 F. 3d 622 - Court of Appeals, 9th

Circuit 2019

Cohen v. Office Depot. Inc.. 184 F. 3d 1292 - Court of

Appeals, 11th Circuit 1999.................................... 25

Crooker v. United States Dep't of Justice, 632 F.2d

916, 921 (1st Cir. 1980))......................................... 31

Cunningham. 664 F.2d at 387 n. 4............ ............. 31

DeBold, 735 at 1043.................................................. 31

Hanna v. Plumer. 380 US 460,470- Supreme Court

1965

Hobby Lobby Stores. Inc, v. Sebelius. 568 US 1401 Supreme Court 2012................................................ 1

Hodge v. Police Officers. 802 F. 2d 58 - Court of

Appeals, 2nd Circuit 1986...................................

Hohn v. United States. 524 US 236 - Supreme Court

1998.................................................................................. 1

In re Gault. 387 U.S. 1, 36-37, 87S.Ct. 1428, 18*632

L.Ed.2d 527 (1967)..................................................... 28

Jacob WINKELMAN, a minor, by and through his

parents and legal guardians. Jeff and Sandee

WINKELMAN. et al.. v. PARMA CITY SCHOOL

DISTRICT. 550 U.S. 516- 127 S.Ct. 1994 (2007).27

KARUPAIYAN v. SIANO | 53 A.3d 662 (2012)...... 20

Maclin v. Freake, 650 F. 2d 885 - Court of Appeals.

7th Circuit 1981........................................................... 26

Montgomery v. Pinchak. 294 F. 3d 492 - USCA, 3rd

Cir. 2002

OJASWA PATHAK vs. UNION OF INDIA. Dkt#

W.P.(C) No. 000250 - / 2019

4, 6, 14

Osei-Afrive v. The Medical College of Pennsylvania.

937F.2d 876 (3d Cir. 1991)

26, 28

Robidoux v. Rosengren. 638 F. 3d 1177 - Court of

Appeals, 9th Cir 2011.............................................. 28

Rosado v. Wyman. 397 U. S. 397, 403, n. 3 (1970) ....1

Salahuddin u. Cuomo. 861 F. 2d 40 - Court of

Appeals, 2nd Circuit 1988......................................... 25

Spindel v. Soindel. 283 F. Supp. 797 - Dist. Court,

ED New Yorkl968...................................................... 3

Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park. Inc.. 396 US 229 Supreme Court 1969

i, 10

Tabron v. Grace. 6 F. 3d 147 - Court of Appeals, 3rd

Circuit 1993

Xll

Title VII................................................................

Troxel v. Granville. 530 U.S. 57 (2000)............ i, 36

Troxel u. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (U.S. 2000)....

Washington v. Glucksberg. 521 U. S. 702, 720..

Washington v. Glucksberg. 521 U.S. 702 (1997)

Statutes

28 U. S. C. § 1651

28 U.S.C. § 1654 .,

42U.S.C § 1982..

42 US Code § 1982

All Writs Act.........

Constitutional Provisions

14th amendment...............

Article VI. Paragraph 2....

VI.

Petition for Writ(s) of Certiorari

Petitioner respectfully prays that a Writ of

Certiorari issue to review the opinion/judgment/

orders of US Dist Court for NJ (23-cv-844-SDW) below

and USCA3 opinion/orders on 23-1788

VII.

Opinion(s)/orders/Judgment(s)

BELOW (from Dist Court/USCA3)

1. US Dist. Court for NJ WHEREAS OPINION

03/6/2023 (ECF-5) App.04

2. Dist. Court For NJ’s Sua Sponte WHEREAS ORDER

dismiss the complaint 3/6/2023 (ECF-6) App.14

3. Dist. Court’s Order Grating forma pauperism for

Appeal granted 03/23/2023, ECF-10. App.14

4. US Dist Court’s opinion and order for denying

motion for reconsideration ECF-18. 19 05/11/2023.

App.15,17.

Hon. Susan D. Wigenton USD J; Hon. James B.

Clark, USMJ

5. USCA3’s Osei Order. 05/5/2023 App.18. (Vacated 05/

10/2023).

VIII.

Jurisdiction

In Hohn v. United States. 524.US.236-S.Ct

1998<&258(“Rosado v. Wyman. 397.US.397,403,

n.3(1970)(a Court always has jurisdiction to

determine its jurisdiction)).

Hohn@264(“We can issue a common-law writ of

certiorari under the All Writs Act. 28 USC§1651)

Hobby Lobby Stores. Inc, v. Sebelius. 568 US 1401 —

S.Ct 2012@643

The only source of authority for this Court to issue an

injunction is the All Writs Act, 28 USC.§1651(a) and

Following a final judgment, they [Petitioner] may, if

necessary, file a petition for a writ of certiorari in this

Court.

Petitioner filed timely Notice of Petition for Writ of

Mandamus [3/20/23] App.01 and further amended it

on 05/09/2023, 05/11/2023. App.2-3.

The appeal is Docketed [23-1788] and pending

with USCA3.

US Supreme Court has Jurisdiction under

S.Ct. RULE 11 and 28 USC§2101(E).

IX.

Constitutional and Statutory

Provisions involved

Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a)(2) and (3), 8(f), 12(e), 17, 54(c)

1st 4th, 5th, 8th, 14th amendment

Article VI. Paragraph 2. Constitution

42 USC§1982,1983,1988

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955-Amended

Hindu Succession Act, 1956 -Amended

Indian family Court order (App2.26.28)

Indian penal codes.

Comparative Approaches of Supreme Courts of the

World’s Largest and Oldest Democracies

-By Justice Hon. Stephen Breyer of US Supreme

Court, Chief Justice Hon. NV Ramana of Indian

Supreme Court, and William M Treanor, Dean of

Georgetown University Law Centre Dated: April 11,

2022

The NJ Law against Discrimination (NJLAD) and

Statement of the Case

a) At District Court Proceeding

Plaintiffs filed forma pauperis and civil action against

Respondents. Plaintiff requested civil action to be

combined with Criminal action. Charges were

ranging from bicycles thief to NJ Chief Justice

violating civil, parental and constitutional rights and

so on.

Before serving the complaint, Dist Court entered

(Sua Sponte). WHEREAS OPINION AND ORDER

to dismiss the complaint with prejudice [3/6/2023]

App.4,14

Plaintiff filed Notice of Petition for mandamus

r3/20/20231App.0f

b) At USCA 3rd Cir. Proceeding

On 05/5/2023, USCA3 issued Osei order. App App.18.

05/9/2023 USCA issued Stay order App.20, next days

vacated. Dkt#5, Dkt#ll.

Final order/Judgment from USCA3 is pending.

XI.

Reasons for Granting the Writs the

Writ(s)

a) Grant Children Custody, Invalidated

Judgement of divorce-JOD (App2JL7),

Invalidating Final Restraining Orders

FROs App2.1.11. and Validate Indian

family Court Order App2.26.28.

Test-2. 1) Petitioner have best interest of

Evaluation.(App2.43,44), Respondent Ramya hold

the custody/FROs/JoD by Fraud-on-Court/Judicial

fraud.(App2.9,10)

Test-3. DBeck v. Beck. 432 A. 2d 63 - NJ: S.Ct

1981,@499, Children’s best interest is polestar for

grating children custody

2)Spindel v. Snindel.283F. Supp.797 - D.Ct,

EDNY1968@811

..For what the judgment was rendered is not essential.

It is that it was obtained by fraud, and hence unjust to

hold and use, and, because it is, the Court has

jurisdiction." 78 F.@835 320 US 796, 64 S.Ct. 263, 88

L.Ed. 480 (1943).

So Petitioners pray this Court should invalidate JOD

and FROs granted by NJ, and validating Indian

family Court reconciliation order App2.24.26. Grand

the child custody to Petitioner until Ramya should

appear in the Indian family Court.

b) Issue an order to Indian Supreme Court

TO DISMISS AND

THE DOCKET IS

O JASWA PATHAK vs. UNION OF INDIA,

Dkt# W.P.(C)No.250/2019

Test-2. When this Petitioner filed US Dist Court case

in Newark, NJ, docket under this petitioner request

to review, NJ Supreme Court justices and landlord

respondents hired proxy peoples India to file case in

India Supreme Court to strike down the section of

Indian Family law based on the Indian family Court

reconciliation order Ann2.24 was granted to this

petitioner.

The docket in Indian Supreme Court OJASWA

PATHAK vs. UNION OF INDIA. Dkt#W.P.(C)No.

250/2019.

When Pathak is active, not closed, petitioners’ case in

US Federal Court delayed, petitioner is suffering

more than 7 years which is inhuman loss, damage,

injury to the petitioners.

The NJ S.Ct activity is uncivilized.

Test-3. NJ S.Ct doing above such, the case is delayed

unnecessarily. Three times NJ S.Ct pressured Indian

S.Ct, here case is delayed 3 years. Totally the

Petitioners suffered which no human Being should

suffer in civilized society and wasting time in the US

federal Court. So this prayer should be granted.

Striking down the Indian family law in-part against

the order Petitioner got from India is not going to be

nullify the order past 10 years. Approx. 10 years ago,

one India lady got reconciliation order from India

which is not going to be null now. She might have two

more kids now. Who is going to step in their home and

tell husband and wife get out and live separate.

Petitioner have gave a Indian family Court petition in

English translated as they needed so they knew what

is going to be out come. They are corrupt and forever

corrupt. Only truth and justice should survive.

When OJASWA PATHAK is not closed and

kept on wasting time of Federal Court, this Court

issue order to Indian S.Ct to dismiss and close the

docket in Indian S.Ct

In the past, there was a scam in Indian parliament

question for cash. When the matter went to Indian

supreme Court which warned the Member of

parliament due to proxy activiy on the parliament.

Same/Similar situation in the Pathak case, these

proxy peoples were hired by this case respondents

including NJ judicial authorities.

These respondents hire the people around the

petitioner to talk over the phone and records the phone

call. Lot of people called petitioner and threaten to

withdraw district Court complaint. Few weeks ago,

one of petitioner’s past co-worker[609-787-5056/732242-2882] called that these NJ, Judges respondents

were ready to pay $200k, if he allowed this petitioner

to have sex with his wife. These respondents have

multiple to . defend the petitioner so they hire proxy

people to delay the case. Another instant, namely

Khan[848-234-8217] wanted the petitioner to contract

marry his wife for her green card. He said that This

idea and petitioner phone number was given by

landlord respondents, (obstruction-of-justice, where

all prayer tobe granted)

Especialy the proxy Pathak. is-to delay this

case, wasting time of US-federal Courts.

For any and all reasons stated above, petitioners

pray this Court issue an order to Indian Supreme

Court to dismiss and close the is OJASWA PATHAK

vs. UNION OF INDIA. Dkt#WP(C)No 250/2019.

c) WRIT AGAINST NJ FOR

1. Order that NJ govt/Local Govt(s) and Chief

Justice of NJ Supreme Court should not

appoint/Promote NJ Supreme Court justice,

appellate

Court

Judge,

and

Administrative Director of the Courts of NJ

Courts, any judicial officers including

Municipal Judges, and appoint 22 NJ

Supreme Court Justices thru Collesium

Process. And Invalidate the NJ Supreme

Court justices/NJ appellate Judges who were

appointed/ promoted by NJ govt/NJ Supreme

Court Chief justice.

Test-2. When the case/related case under

subjudiced, NJ S.Ct Chief Justice appointed/

promoted the NJ S.Ct justice, NJ appellate Court

Judges, Administrative director of the Courts of NJ

Courts.

Also When the case/related case is under

subjudiced NJ govt appointed Fabiana PierreLouis as NJ S.Ct Justice and NJ appointed NJ

S.Ct justices Wainer Apter and Douglas

Fasciale. These appointment/promotions

violated the ruling by age, gender (Title VII), in

Babb v. Wilkie. 140 S.Ct. 1168 - S.Ct 2020 and

Babb v. Secretary, dept. Of veterans affairs. 992 F.

3d 1193 -USCA11- 2021

Test-3. Under said Supremacy Clause this Court

has power to enforce the federal law and rules and

ruling.

Article VI, Para-2 Constitution (Supremacy

Clause). It establishes that the federal constitution,

and federal law generally, take precedence over

state laws, and even state constitutions.

In Comparative Approaches of Supreme Courts

of the World's Largest and Oldest Democracies, by

Justice Stephen Breyer of USSC, CJI NY

Ramana,(4/11/2022), CJI said that Judge

promoting Judge is not true democracy.

In fact Judge or Govt prom ote /appoint Judge is not

true democracy.

Notably, historically, NJ Lawmaker appoint

relatives, friends as NJ S.Ct’s Justices personal

gain. Recently close to 100 Judges were forced to

resign who are relatives/friend to NJ Lawmaker

and because their retirement account had

disproportionate money.

Petitioner(s) prays an order that NJ

Govt/Local Govts/NJ chief Justice should not

appoint/promote Justice/Judge to NJ S.Ct, NJ

appellate Court, Admin. Director of NJ Court,

Municipal Judges including any Judicial officers

and these position should be appointed by

Collegium Process as CJI said

“Collegium process to appoint Judges most

democratic”

“On judicial appointments, CJI Ramana said that

although the government is a key stakeholder, when

the collegium reiterates its decision to appoint a

candidate, the government has no choice but to

comply with it”

‘Cannot get more democratic than this [Collegium

process]”

United States should have common Collegium to

appoint all its State’s Apex/S.Ct, Appellate Court

justices/Judges.

This Court should invalidated the all

appointment/promotion of NJ S.Ct Justice/

appellate Court Judges by NJ Govt and NJ chief

justice. Functioning of NJ S.Ct Justice, Appellate

Court justice should be independence of politician

said

which

violated

above

appointment/promotion. So collegium process is

needed in appointing i)Trial Judges, ii)

Appellant Court Judges, iii)NJ S.Ct Justices

iv) or any judicial officers including NJ

Municipal Judges. When Chief Justice of NJ S.Ct

retired or become vacant one of the associate

justice of NJ S.Ct should be promoted to NJ S.Ct

Chief Justice.

When NJ S.Ct’s associated justice retire/vacant,

NJ appellate Judges or Appellate Judges from

sister states should appoint them as NJ S.Ct

Justice thru Collegium process.

so Petitioner pray this Court for order to appoint

22 justices thru Collesium Process.

Petitioner pray this Court that This Court

should invalidate the NJ S.Ct / NJ appellate

Judges appointed/promoted by NJ govt/NJ Chief

justice including Fabiana Pierre-Louis, Justice

Wainer Apter, and Douglas Fasciale since this

case/related case was filed/subjudiced.

This Court should order that NJ S.Ct justice

should retire at age 70 or five years of service with

NJ S.Ct whichever comes 1st

There 20 states in United States have Judicial

Nominating Commissions/ Assisted Commission

which similar or subset of Collegium process for

appointing States’ S.Ct justices.

Judge/justice should not promote/appoint another

Judge is not democracy by Hon. CJI Ramana’s

opinion. These NJ appellate Court Judges should

be appointed thru Collegium process.

Thru Collegium process, Appointing NJ S.Ct

justices, NJ appellate Court Judges, any judicial

officer including Municipal Judges should not

violated the ruling of Babb v. Wilkie, 140 S. Ct.

1168 -2020 and Babb v. SECRETARY. DEPT. OF

VETERANS AFFAIRS. 992 F. 3d 1193 - Court of

Appeals, 11th Circuit 2021.

Accordingly as above, State of NJ should make

changes/amendment to NJ Constitution.

Order that Edison Twp Mayor Appointed

Municipal Judge Dipti Vaid Dedhia is invalid.

2. LEFT BLNK

3. Shared Children Custody and NJ should not

violate Parents disability in grating children

Custody.

Test-2. Ramya hold Children custody because she

does not got work so will not be able to pay child

support, because I was going to work, fake FRO order

was entered against me to order the child support.

Further continues bill the child support, Judicial

fraud consolidation order filed obstruct my justice.

Millions of time, NJ judicial authorities did these

wrongdoings against millions of family and

Violated the 14th amendment parental rights.

Test-3. Denying Share Custody, denying custody due

to disability is continuously violated the Parental

rights 14th amendment. Also bring down the Family

Court Corruption/fraud. When the Petitioner spine

injured in car accident, unable to work for 18 months,

parental rights were not violated, 2 year old child

home eviction, breath cold air, had chest pain.

4. Acceptable form(s) of Child Support and

Save the child support money to Child need.

Test-2. In NJ family Courts Child support money and

IRS income tax, Disability income/SSA, title vi-d, and

Unemployment withhold due to Childsupport. These

money(s) were become benefit of Family Court lawyer

and NJ Judicial Authorities upto NJ S.Ct. For the

reasons, NJ judicial authorities and family Court

attorney focus to rob the above said money.

Test-3. Saving the Child support money, IRS income

tax, Disability income/SSA, title vi-d, and

Unemployment withhold due to Childsupport in

Children Saving should be used for Children college

education and bring down the family Court

corruption/fraud. Children are protect by SNAP,

When Petitioner spine injure on help was available to

his kids.

5. i) Family Properties inheritance to Children,

ii) No lawyer fee from family properties,

Disclose/open-to-public family Ct lawyer fee.

Test-2. NJ judicial authorizes and family Court

lawyer focus to find the Family properties, in the

name of Family lawyer fee, rob the family properties

and family saving for kids education, share up to NJ

S.Ct justices. To rob the family properties and kids

form

any

saving,

educational

fraud/corruption/bribe the NJ judicial authorities and

lawyers do.

Test-3. Moving/Saving the family properties to

Children

inheritance

and

above

prayer

wrongdoing/fraud/bribe/corruption in the NJ family

Court should go down.

The above wrongdoing of NJ judicial

authorities, family Court lawyers were violation in 42

US Code § 1982 - Property rights of Citizens.

In Sullivan v. Little Huntine Park. Inc.. 396

US 229 - Sup. Ct 1969®237

“Section 1982 covers the right "to inherit, purchase,

lease, sell, hold, and convey real and personal

property."

These respondents did same wrong doings against this

Petitioner caused unmatchable, unsubstitutable

damages.

6. NJ family Court records should not be under

seal and No Property matter/financial

matter disclosure discussed in Family Court.

Test-2. Under inheritance, Section 1982, Sullivan, all

these properties (moving/non-moving) are moved to

the children from begin of the family case.

Now the family properties, financial matter

disclosure matter are filed from the beginning of the

case is to aid the Attorney(s)/family Court Judges to

focus the billing and sharing upto NJ S.Ct justices.

What is the need of sealing the family Court docket?

When the property/wealth are move to children as

inheritance, no privacy violation. People divorced

status is not privacy violation. Under seal is to protect

the how the fraud/corruption by the family Court

Judges/lawyers. When Amazon CEO Jeff got divorce,

both party discuss in the media that how much wealth

they obtained. Why should the poor people divorce

under seal?

Test-3. Property/Wealth does nothing in the two

individual’s divorce when the children involved.

Moving the property/wealth to children do not injury

to the family case party(s) and wealth is with their

loved children who can use the wealth to their

educational need (example). Most importantly take

out the ill eyes of Family Court Judges/ NJ Judicial

Authorities, and family Court lawyers. NJ judicial

authorities wrongdoings against this Petitioners

because their ill eye focused the Petitioners $400k

home in India. See they octopus hand go other side of

the earth. Granting These prayers should bring the

corruption in Nj family Court to down.

d) Writ against NJ Judicial authorities.

7. i) NJ Judicial Authorities involve in family

case should get mental fitness certificate

yearly.

ii) NJ Judicial authorities’ Yearly Financial

disclosure Statement to be Open to public.

iii) NJ Judicial Authorities to file timesheet

for every 15 minutes of their duty.

Test-2: Routinely, habitually NJ judicial authorities

ordered/compelled the parents for psychiatric

evaluation for granting children visitation/custody,

share the money from psychiatric billing parents.

Recently in NJ, One Psychiatric was ordered to file

affidavit that she should not renew her license in NJ

for sharing money with NJ judicial.

Nj Judicial authorities paid from public money,

corruption free should be prefix to Judicial authority.

Few Months ago, closed to 100 Nj Judges from trial

Court to NJ appellate Court forced to resign due to

disappropriate money saved in their retirement

account thru corruption/bribery.

Nj judicial authorities paid from public money and

public wanted to know what to they do and how their

time is used. Sitting in the public office, doing

corruption, why they need to be paid from the public

money. Timesheet should have what they do every 15

minutes. Paid by public money so public should know

what respondents do.

Test-3. NJ judicial authorities’ irreparable damages,

inhuman decision to the NJ family’s and the children

with their psychological illness. Getting psychological

fitness should not cost them either because health

insurance is already provided to them by NJ govt. So

Parental rights and children’s rights under equal

protection clause were protected.

NJ judicial authorities should be prefix from

corruption/bribery. NJ Judicial authorities’ yearly

financial disclosure Statement to be Open to public

bring the prefix corruption to them. They were paid

thru public money, public should know they were

corruption from at first. Same reason, public should

know what they do every 15 minutes by their

timesheet. Petitioner worked many govt officer where

15 minutes tasked timesheet is must.

8. Order NJ S.Ct to provide a copy of Ramya’s

Response brief.

Test-2. Naga, the attorney for Ramya already

disqualified. NJ judicial authorities and Naga filed

response brief without Ramya’s knowledge. This brief

has crime against the Petitioner, his family. Legally

Petitioner entitled what other party filing. Multiple

time Petitioner requested the Nj S.Ct thru motion and

verbally which was denied. Based on the Ramya’s

proxy briefing, Petitioner certification with Nj S.Ct

denied and Petitioner and his family, children are

suffering, injured till today. This is clear abuse of

discretion/usurpation of judicial power.

Test-3. Petitioner is entitled to get justice from the

injustice provided by NJ S.Ct from the Ramya’s proxy

Briefing. The crime in the Ramya’s proxy filing is jail

able crime.

9. NJ S.Ct should not hire proxy peoples India

file case in Indian S.Ct to strike down the

Indian family law based on Petitioner Indian

family Court.

Test-2. NJ Judges, After entering FRO for fake dv

case, Judicial fraud consolidation, separating the

Petitioner and his family and children, violating the

14th amendment, parental right, violated the

Petitioner cohabitation of family, sexual rights of

Petitioner, dishonoring Indian family Court, hired

proxy people to file case in Indian S.Ct to strike down

the Indian family act on which Petitioner got family

reconciliation order.

Docket is OJASWA PATHAK vs. UNION OF

INDIA. Dkt#W.P.(C)No.250/2019

Test-3. NJ S.Ct doing above such, the case is delayed

unnecessarily. Three times NJ S.Ct pressured in

Indian S.Ct, here the case is delayed 3 years. Totally

the Petitioners suffered which no human Being

should suffer in civilized society and wasting time in

the US federal Court. So this prayer should be

granted. Striking down the Indian family law in-part

against the order Petitioner got from India is not

going to be nullify the order past 10 years. Approx. 10

years ago, one India lady got reconciliation order from

India which is not going to be null now. She might

have two more kids now. Who is going to step in their

home and tell husband and wife get out and live

separate. Petitioner have gave a Indian family Court

petition in English translated as they needed so they

knew what is going to be out come. They are corrupt

and forever corrupt. Only truth and justice should

survive.

When OJASWA PATHAK is not closed and

kept on wasting time of Federal Court, this Court

issue order to Indian S.Ct to dismiss and close the

docket in Indian S.Ct

10. Left blank

e) AGAINST NJ

11. i) Trial by Juries in family Courts, ii) Strike

down lawless family Court and create Civil

family law iii) Equal rights to men in family

Court

Test-2. Without any law and without Jury, NJ family

After

Court run and ordered to the parties.

Consolidation order was found to fraud, this

Petitioner requested Jury(s) appointment which was

denied. NJ family Court Judges and attorney(s)

involve any fraud/corruption/bribe to make money

thru billing and share the money up NJ S.Ct justices.

Without Jury, domestic violence cases, divorce cases,

child support orders, child custody orders, before

issuing bench warrant and jailing matter of child

support/spouse support were decided which violated

the fair justice, due process guaranteed by

constitution.

Because of No law to run the family Court, above said

wrongdoings /corruption/ Bribery were happening in

the NJ family Court which ultimately violated the

constitutional rights.

Because Im Black man from India, Restraining order

were issued for the purpose of billing child support

money, which violated the parental rights 14th

amendment.

Test-3.

The

above

said

family

Court

action/wrongdoings were violating constitutional

rights including due process. At Either parties

demand Juries need to be available to protect the

constitutional rights.

Any trial Court should be under Law. Running NJ

family Court without law, it is kangaroo Court by Nj

politician and their relative/friend are Judges to rob

the families and their saving for their kids’ education.

Nj family Court issuing restraining order because a

party is men violate the fair justice constitutional

rights and 14th amendment parental rights. Without

Jury deciding family Court orders were for purpose of

corruption benefit of NJ law mater and NJ Judicial

authorities.

12. Consolidate the NJ family Court (lawless,

kangaroo Court), NJ Law division civil Court

and Landlord/Tenant Court.

Test-2. Minor Petitioner PP born from Little Rock,

AR where one civil Court, under one roof have trial

for Civil matter and family matter. For the purpose of

Black money transaction Naga, Jayapalan, Ranjeeth

filed the fake domestic violence case and no

jurisdictional divorce case. When the Petitioner

requested the NJ family Court to add Ranjeeth,

Jayabalan as defendant to the case which was denied.

Civil matter need to be put together to avoid

piecemeal litigation.

Even After lease expired, landlord filed complaint

with Landlord/Tenant Court and got Judgement

against this Petitioner by alleging that defendant did

not pay rent, reported to rental history. Illegally The

landlord towed Champing van, I was not able to get

justice over 7 years. When all type of Court

consolidated, all dispute can be put together without

piecemeal litigation.

Test-3. The fake domestic violence case is decided in

10 days by law for billing childsupport money. This

case over 7 years waiting for justice. In car accident,

Petitioner had spine injury which still pain, home

went eviction, heating was not affordable, Minor PP

breath cold air had chest pain when he was 2 years

old. Still today Petitioner did not got compensation for

spine injury. These 3 type of Courts are running

separate to deny justice to layman, corrupt minded

people to be benefitted. In Civil case, every claim

against every party need to be put together and tried.

13. i) No gun carrying Police involve in family

matter, ii) No arrest to the people who need

medical treatment, iii) no township police

overtime.

Test-2. The county or township police came to my

home with gun for enforcing childsupport which is for

billing purpose. When the Petitioner had spine injury

by car accident, unable to work 18 months, home was

under eviction, heating was not affordable, 2 years old

minor Petitioner PP got chest pain by breathed cold

air. No police with gun went to car insurance company

get the loss of Petitioners. Police coming to home,

cross firing should endanger innocent neighbor as

well.

The county jail the ill/sick/disabled people and

provide treatment when they are in the custody by

county expense. County’s tax payers do not need to

take care of the sick people treatment.

Township police come to collect the childsupport on

their over time. When police station is opened for 24

hour, why should the police need to work overtime. In

Edison twp, NJ 3 police reported overtime, never

appeared on the private construction business and

collected over million dollars. When township needed

additional police resource, State trooper should fill

the needed.

Test-3. The family Court Judge rob the parents in the

name of childsupport. Police with gun help robbing

Judge, innocent parent goes to jail. This is not the

police duty. County tax payer is not responsible for

disabled/ill people medical treatment. Police over

NJ MVC/DMV is not

time lead to corruption,

protected by private security and local police overtime

protect the private business. All for the keep the

corruption purpose.

14.Wipeout the FROs/arrest/jailing records.

Test-2. The charges against Petitioner were a)

Petitioner told his wife go to work, do not involve

black money transaction, do not take the children to

daytime parties which endanger the children, did not

bring the India family home money for the benefit of

NJ Judicial authorities,

Test-3. For the above reason, FROs were entered

against Petitioner, Arrested/jailed for multiple times,

family value is defamed in USA and India. Anyone

using/ abusing these records is crime. Those records

should not be accessible/available to anyone.

15.15 is left blank

16. Deduct 20% from NJ Law makers to pay the

Petitioners loss.

Test-2. NJ trial/family Court/appellate Judges, NJ

S.Ct Judge were appointed by NJ law makers because

of Judges were relative/friend to them. So the corrupt

Judges do corruption/fraud to benefit to them and the

lawmakers. For the Petitioners’ loss, NJ law maker’s

wrongdoing

contributed.

Few

month back

approximately 100 NJ Judges were forced to resign

from duty because they were relative/friend to NJ

lawmaker so appointed as Judge and their retirement

account had money in disappropriate amount.

Test-3 NJ law maker wrongdoing were one of the

reason for the Petitioners damages/suffering. Detect

20% of NJ lawmakers’, who served since 1995, any

and all compensation including salary, pension, and

govt benefit for paying Petitioners’ loss. Future

judicial corruption should be avoided.

17. Move the Middlesex County’s Court and

Childsupport probation employees in to NJ

payroll.

Test-2. These Child support employees work for

collecting child support to benefit of judicial

corruption, family Court Judges benefit. When the

shared custody is granted, these employees are not

required at all.

In this case, Middlesex county Court employees

involved in the Fraud-on-the Court or judicial fraud

consolidation order for the purpose of NJ Judicial

authorities and NJ lawmaker. NJ Judicial authorities

and NJ lawmaker have relative/friend relationship by

appointing NJ Judicial authorities.

Test-3. Shared children custody is granted,

these employees are not needed. County tax payer do

not need to pay childsupport collection effort or

corrupt Judge’s pocket filled by child support.

Enforcing state law so state should pay these

employees salary.

Fraud/judicial fraud on the county Court, for

the benefit of NJ judicial and NJ law makers,

Middlesex county tax payer should NOT be

responsible for the fraud or any wrongdoing. Moving

Middlesex county’s Court and childsupport probation

employees should bring the corruption in the NJ

judiciary and NJ govt. Unnecessarily County tax

payer do not need to be responsible for the Court

employees wrong.

18. Order to cut 80% of federal funds to NJ and

its Local govt.

Test-2. In the corruption, NJ is in the top 3 and

competing Louisiana and

Illinois when the NJ responsible were highly

educated than any part of

the earth. The number/density of Doctors, Engineers,

Scientists in NJ per square miles more than any part

of earth including Japan. At the time of 2008

recession Petitioner went to Audi dealer Edison NJ

for buying baby car seat, then the peoples (Indians)

were standing on the queue to buy Audi cars when

everybody in US worry about housing bubble.

Test-3. Because of more money available, more

corruption, more crime were done by NJ judicial

authorities and NJ and its local govt officials.

Fittest should survive. People are rich so they get fit

to survive, themselves. Instead of Federal funds

spend in NJ which cause more corruption, those

federal fund should be used in under developed

area/regions of US to promote the needy people. So

Petitioner pray this Court to cut 80% of federal

fund/aid to NJ and its local govts.

f) Writ(s) against Middlesex County, NJ

19.Middlesex County NJ to pay $42 million

dollar for collecting child support illegally

Test-2. Middlesex family Court entered the FRO for

fake domestic violence case. Middlesex County Court

employees involved fraud on the Court/judicial fraud

consolidation order and collected childsupport over

$42 thousand dollars based on fraud consolidation

order for the benefit of NJ judicial authorities.

In the KARUPAIYAN v. SIANO | 53 A.3d 662 (2012),

Petitioner had spine injury and unable to work 18

months, Petitioner is only income holder to family,

Middlesex county did not take any effort to get

support to the children who suffered home eviction,

heating not affordable, breathed cold air, suffered

chest pain. In fact, Middlesex sheriff should went

with gun to Car insurance Company collected the loss

of the Petitioners from car accident injury which is hit

and run, a proxy appeared to testify with knowledge

of attorney and trial Judge.

Test-3. This pattern of colleting childsupport

happened millions of cases. Nobody can question this

corruption because this corrupt money is shared upto

NJ S.Ct justice. Partially I paid childsupport thru

credit card which I paid 29% interest. The prayer is

reasonable to any unbiased persons. Petitioner pray

this Court to order the defendants including

Middlesex County to pay 29% Cumulative interest, so

the respondent will not delay the case.

g) Against

all

defendants/respondents.

Individual

20. i) Jailing L. Naganda, P. Jayabalan; J.

Ranjeeth Kumar, Arul Thirumurugu, David

Halpern, Marcia Silva, Craig Corson, Jerald

Council, Stuart Rabner, Jaynee la Vecchia,

Barry t. Albin, Anne m. Patterson, Faustino j.

Fernandez-Vina, Lee a. Solomon, Walter f.

Timpone, Glenn Grant, Allison e. Accurso,

Patrick Dealmeida, Joseph 1. Yannotti for 25

years AND ii) protection/restraining order

against these Individuals and iii) Remove NJ

S.Ct Justices, NJ appellate/family Court

Judges defending the Petitioner and iii)

Invalidate all the orders signed by these NJ

judicial authorities.

Test-2. Petitioner is head of the family decide

what is good for the family. Because I told my wife to

work, do not involve black money transaction against

govt of India, and because I cleaned the lease expired

apartment which was forced by landlord for their

illegal benefit, the Petitioners went thru inhuman

suffering which no one should go thru in civilized

society, and still continuing. These Respondents

filed/involved/caused the FROs/Fraud consolidation

to the Petitioners which continue to be yet.

They involved in the endangerment/attempted to

murder of the Petitioners. App2.73.74.

These

individual forever endanger the Petitioner, Minor

children, Ramya and continue endanger the forever.

Test-3. Obvious Circumstances, still Petitioners

are separated, co-habiting, parental rights is violated.

Cause the Petitioner to be arrested/jailed multiple

times. Jailing these Individual respondents for 25

year and issuing Permanent restraining /protection

order against these Individual is must to protect the

Petitioner, his minor children, and Ramya.

h) Writs against the Landlord

RESPONDENTS

21. Money Relief to Children by Landlord

Test-2. Petitioner rented apartment in Dallas, TX

before Lease expiring with this landlord, Oak tree

village, Edison NJ, which owned by Atlantic Reality.

Landlord

got

under

table

money

from

Jayapalan/Naga and allow them to occupy the

apartment. Landlord told the Petitioner to clean the

lease expired apartment which get the FRO against

Petitioner(s), family, children were separated.

Petitioner unable to tell Ramya to go work for kids

Marriage expense which is unlimited to Indian

family.

Test-3. Children separated from father/parents

for 7 years is unacceptable for anyone in the civilized

society. Childhood is gone, unmatchable loss. Also

landlord filed false affidavit with Dist Court that

Atlantic reality is not owner of Oak tree apartment,

but negotiated with Edison Township for tax evasion

as owner of the properties and failed to appear as the

Court ordered for settlement conference. This Court

should order landlord defendants to pay 100 million

dollar for each Minor child Petitioner’s marriage

children.

expense

/Educational

22.Landlord to pay $100 million to Petitioner

for leasing inhabitability apartments.

Test-2. Landlord (Atlantic) leased roof leaking

apartment to the Petitioner. Not only was the

Petitioner’s living unit leaking. Whole apartment

complex was roof leaking. Landlord owe continues 4

apartment complex Edison, NJ, all of them roof

leaking. Whenever renter request fix the roof or delay

payment until fix the roof, Landlord file eviction to

harass the Talents which is easy since

Landlord/Tenants Courts are corrupt with them.

Every apartment complex owned by Atlantic roof

leaking, same business model. Previous owner sold

the apartment to Atlantic with when time to replace

the roof, Atlantic purchased at cheap rate and do not

want fix the expensive roof fix since Atlantic have

relation with Tenant/landlord Court Judge corrupt

relation to evict and collect money.

Test-3 Due to leased roof leaking apartment,

Petitioner head/scalp got virus infection and

prolonged head ache for years. Petitioner got

prescription to heal the viral infection. Viral infection

got many years to heal. Same/similar prayer is in

attached Exhibits.

One of Co-worker when I worked in NY city who lived

in Atlantic reality’s apartment, said she had 2 years

old kids who suffered by leaky roof. Whenever she

request to fix the roof, she was told that call 3rd party

Middlesex management who is the contractor to fix

the roof.

23. Order that assign the ownership of Landlord

any and all business including Atlantic

reality, ownership of any and all rental

apartments, Landlord Halpern’s ownership

building to the Petitioners.

Test-2. In the Petitioner vision, more 70 apartment

complex owned by Atlantic reality, on all complex

roofs were leaking. Roofing is expensive fix. Any

tenant/renter request to fix the roof, landlord answer

should be that roof fix is giving to 3rd party contract

(Middlesex management) so call the 3rd party.

Middlesex management is again owned by

landlord/Atlantic/Halpern. Any renter refused/delay

the rent due to roof leaking, the landlord file eviction,

over charge the renter and share the money with

Landlord/tenant Court Judge. In this case, Petitioner

timely gave notice and timely moved out, lease

expired, the landlord filed eviction in the

landlord/tenant Court by paying corruption to Judge,

robbed me closed to $9,000, listed me in rental history

so unable to rent apartment so the Petitioner and his

disabled sister age close 70 was suffering without

home and slept in the car.

In the main holding business, Atlantic reality

employee only 13 employees from his relative to get

out of Title VII claims. Other Business, Middlesex

management employees all illegal Latin America

peoples so paid low salary illegally or do not even pay

salary for tax evasion. Since the employees were

unfairly paid, for survival they rob the renters who

are mostly/90% Indian who have lot of gold jewel, in

home.

Test-3. Landlord filed false declaration with

Dist Court that landlord is only investor, no interest

in the Apartment complex. In an official meeting with

Edison, NJ’s Mayer/council man /politician, Mr.

Halpern stated that he is owner of the apartment

building, he wanted tax benefit for the apartment

buildings.

Petitioner prays this Court for order the ownership of

all apartments, Real Estates, moving/non-moving

properties owned by Atlantic reality, Middlesex

Management, and Mr. Halpern and his family to the

Petitioner. Petitioner will run the business in nonprofitable way and pay all the taxes landlord evaded

against Federal, NJ local govt.

When the Dist Court ordered the landlord to appear

for settlement conference, landlord failed to appear.

Contempt of Court. This prayer should be granted as

punitive damages

In Cohen v. Office Depot. Inc.. 184 F. 3d 1292 Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit 1999®1298-1299

“It is true that Rule 54(c) tempers the effect of Rule

8(a)(3) somewhat by stating that, except in the case of

default judgments, "every final judgment shall grant

the relief to which the party in whose favor it is

rendered is entitled, even if the party has not

demanded such relief in the party's pleadings."

‘®Hanna v. Plumer.380 US460,470-S.Ct 1965@1143.

Likewise, in this case, because *1299 Rule8(a)(3)

allows a plaintiff to request in her initial complaint all

the relief she seeks, it says "implicitly, but with

unmistakable clarity" that a plaintiff is not required

to wait until a later stage of the litigation to include a

prayer for punitive damages, nor is she required to

proffer evidence or obtain leave of Court before doing

i) Writs against Lower Federal Courts

24. Order lower Court (Dist Court) to run the

case as combined civil and criminal case

when remanded.

Test-2. Fraud on Court, judicial fraud, obstruction of

justice, robbed the Petitioner in the name of child

support, involved black money transaction against

govts and so on were crime(s), violated the Indian

family Court orders. Filed and entered FROs for fake

domestic violence case, false arrests, false jailing.

Test-3. The above crimes are eligible to attach with

civil case, run as combined civil and criminal case so

this Court should grant the prayer.

25. Petitioner pray USSC that it should vacate

the Sua sponte dismissal of complaint.

Test-2. By Sua sponte, Dist Court dismissed the

complaint (ECF-6).App.l3

Test-3. In Salahuddin v. Cuomo. 861 F. 2d 40 USCA2,1988 @43( “this Court [USCA2] has

repeatedly cautioned against Sua Sponte dismissals of

pro se civil rights complaints prior to requiring the

defendants to answer. See.Bavron v. Trudeau. 702

F.2d 43,45 (USCA2,1983)). This case, no defendant

answered or appeared. This Court should vacate the

sua sponte Dismissal of the complaint and remand

the case back to Dist Court for further proceeding.

Order denying reconsideration should be vacated

App.17.

26.Appoint i) Guardian ad litem and/or pro

bono attorney

Test-2. Petitioners requested the Lower Court(s) to

appoint guardian ad litem and/or probono attorney.

For this request, regularly the lower Court denied

these requests based on 28 USC§ 1654; OseP-Afriye v.

The Medical College of Penn..vania. 937 F.2d

876(USCA3,1991)

Test-3. In Montgomery v. Pinchak. 294 F. 3d 492 USCA, 3rd Cir. 2002@502(‘Montgomery was not a

sophisticated "iailhouse lawyer"). Tahron v. Grace. 6

F. 3d 147 - Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit 1993® 156157(77ie plaintiff's ability to present his or her case is,

of course, a significant factor that must be considered

in determining whether to appoint counsel. See Hodge.

802 F.2d at 61; Maclin. 650 F.2d at 888). In this case,

Petitioner is homeless, live here and there, cars, an

towed away. Suffering from spine injury.

Bethel School District No403 et al. v. Fraser. A

Minor, et al. 478 US 675(1986) (minor is party and

his father was appointed as Guardian ad litem.

See@FRASER680. The father brought the action in

the Dist Court for FIRST AMENDMENT constitutional

violation. Board Of Education Of The Westside

Community Schools (Dist. 66) et al. V. Mergens. By

And Through Her Next Friend. Mergens. Et. 496 US

1 On 05/10/2023 USCA3 vacated.

226(1990),@233 (Respondents, by and through their

parents as next friends, then brought this suit in the

United States District Court for the District of

for

Nebraska

Constitutional

violation.

ANKENBRANDT, as next friend and mother of L.R.,

et al. v. RICHARDS et al 504 US689(1992) (mother is

party and claimed as next friend to her minor

daughter for tort claim.

In Jacob WINKELMAN, a minor, by and through

his parents and legal guardians, Jeff and Sandee

WINKELMAN. et al„ v. PARMA CITY SCHOOL

DISTRICT. 550 US 516-127 S.Ct. 1994(2007),

In Winkelman, Parents on their own behalf and on

behalf of Jacob, filed a complaint in the United States

District Court for the Northern Dist of Ohio, later

their appeal, without the aid of an attorney,

When the USSC examined “The question is

whether parents, either on their own behalf or as

representatives of the child, may proceed in Court

unrepresented by counsel though they are not trained

or licensed as attorneys”

And USSC ruled that (Winkelman@200 7)

The Court of Appeals erred when it dismissed the

Winkelmans' appeal for lack of counsel.

It is beyond dispute that the relationship between a

parent and child is sufficient to support a legally

cognizable interest [in the education of one's child!: In

this case. Constitutional rights of appellant

Karupaivan’s Children.

Winkelman@2008

"party aggrieved" means "[a] party entitled to a

remedy; esp., a party whose personal, pecuniary, or

property rights have been adversely affected by

another person's actions or by a Court's decree or

judgment" ante, at 2003-2004.

“rights and remedies are parents properly viewed as

"parties aggrieved," capable of filing their own cases

in federal Court. They [Parents] are "parties

aggrieved" when those rights are infringed, and may

accordingly proceed pro se when seeking to

vindicate them”

Winkelman@2011 “They will have the same remedy as

all parents who sue to vindicate their children's rights:

the power to bring suit. I agree with the Court that they

may proceed pro se with respect to the first two claims”

In this case, Appellant Karupaiyan not

only guardians of their children's rights,

Appellant

Karupaiyan

himself

real

party/plaintiff for his claims which is unlike Osei;

Afrive. USCA3’s ruling against this case Appellant

father.

In this case Prose father parental rights under

14th amendment, Washington v. Glucksberg. 521 U.S.

702 (1997). Troxel v. Granville. 530 U.S. 57 (U.S.

2000J.

Children has right on the Reverse of Parental rights,

14th amendment Equal Protection Clause.

Rule 17(c) Robidoux v. Rosengren. 638 F. 3d

1177 - Court of Appeals, 9th Cir 2011@1182 “District

Courts have a special duty, derived from Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 17(c), to safeguard the interests of

litigants who are minors. Rule 17(c) provides, in

relevant part, that a district Court "must appoint a

guardian ad litem or issue another appropriate order

CJLG v. Barr. 923 F. 3d 622-Court of Appeals,

9th Circuit 2019,@632 “children have due process

rights to appointed counsel. See, e.g., In re Gault. 387

U.S.l, 36-37,87 S.Ct.1428,

18 *632 L.Ed.2d

527(1967)”

Under undivided Hindu family act, Court should

appoint Petitioner Palani Karupaiyan (Head of

family) as guardian ad litem to Santhosh

j) Additional

27. Order for each respondents to pay the

for

each

Petitioner(s)

count

discrimination, wrongdoings, injuries and so

on.

Test-2. There are over 100 count of wrong doing did

by the respondents. There respondents involved

uncivilized crime, wrongdoing, fraud on the Court,

judicial fraud. Wrong against elected govt including

crime like money laundering, contempt of Court,

dishonor the Court order, violated the many

constitutional rights, federal statues, and violated

cohabitation, sexual rights of Petitioner. Parental

rights 14th amendment

Test-3. The above wrongdoings are uncivilized to

judicial decision makers. The suffering to the

Petitioners were continuously happening till today.

The respondents involved fraud on the Court, judicial

fraud, obstruction of justice, dishonored the Court

order, contempt of Court and so on which were serious

wrongdoing. The respondents killed the childhood of

my children in front of my eyes for 7 years. The

compensation money prayed against the respondents

were to punish them seriously so they will not repeat

their wrong. In NJ millions of families were robbed by

NJ judicial authorities, local govt official by fraud

family/trial Courts. So Petitioner pray the money

reliefs from the respondents as in the Exhibit-28.

Exhibit-29. Exhibit-30, and Exhibit-31. Because I

filed US Dist Court case, they attempted to murder

the Petitioner, cause spine injury which I suffer till

today. App2.73.74.

28. Order the Local Govts and NJ Judicial

Authorities to pay as per the exhibits

attached to the Minor Petitioner marriage

expense.

Test-2. When the Petitioner told Ramya, petitioner

wife to go work for the children marriage expense

which is no limit for Indian social culture, NJ judicial

authorities issued FROs against Petitioner, further

involved in Judicial Fraud consolidation, shared the

billing child support money up to NJ S.Ct Justices.

Middlesex cnty employees’ involved Fraud

consolidation order caused the FROs to be un

appealable, permanent. Landlord, Atlantic reality is

the original, start of the problem which caused the

FROs. Because FROs un-appealable, permanent

which cause the Petitioner unable to tell Ramya to go

work until now.

Test-3. Petitioner is head of the family of

undivided Indian family. When the head of the family

decide what is good for the family, nobody stands

against it which is crime. Of course, even USA, why

should anyone involve against family financial

income and best interest of the children education.

Even in NJ jurisdiction, anyone tell the spouse go to

work for kids need how NJ judicial authorities involve

against that family best interest. In NJ jurisdiction,

divorce,

$45

ruled

that

$250

they

marriage/remarriage license is available for

unlimited sex which either Indian S.Ct justices or

their family member or this Petitioner would agree.

Marriage expense is no limit for Indian families.

Prays for each defendant to pay $3 million per head

of the respondent of local govt, NJ judicial authorities

to each minor children. All money petitioner able to

spent. Spending is economy,

29.Petitioner(s) pray Order that each defendant

to pay for Petitioners’ effort, pain and

suffering, expenses, litigation cost or pain

and suffering by litigation.

Test-2. Over 7 years the litigation is going on. Lot of

effort to draft the pleading. Lot of painful effort to

draft with spine injuries. Because I dedicated time to

draft the pleasing I was not able to physical activity

to bring down the blood sugar went up. Now both leg,

foot are numbing. Im afraid kidney should be

permanent damage. Due to Situs inversus the born

defect, adapting body parts is not possible either.

Test-3. The defendant hired someone to

attempted murder the Petitioner. The attack to the

Petitioner was deadly, injured the pain. With the pain

in the spine, Petitioner drafted all pleading. Pray

USSC to order them $5 million dollar each defendant

should pay for the time and effort, pain and suffering.

In the painful situation, appointing attorney also

denied. Or this prayer should be paid in pain and

suffering. When I tried to find attorney and unable to

find since Im poor and not able to pay down payment

to the attorney. Lower Court denied pro bono attorney

as well. Also I have claim against the NJ S.Ct

violation of freedom of information act.

Bovadiian v. Cigna Companies. 973 F. Supp.

500 - Dist. Court, D.NJ 1997@504

Although plaintiff may not recover attorneys'

fees, he may recover litigation costs reasonably

incurred. See Cunningham. 664 F.2d at 387 n.

4; Carter. 780 F.2d@1482: DeBold. 735 at 1043

(citing Crooker v. United States Dep't of Justice. 632

F.2d 916, 921 (lstCir.l980)) ("[A] pro se litigant who

substantially prevailed certainly is entitled to

litigation costs reasonably incurred' A pro se

litigant is made whole thereby, serving as a small

incentive to pursue litigation if no attorney may be

found to represent the litigant.")

The First Circuit has reached the opposite

conclusion in Crooker v. Department of Justice.

supra, holding that "in actions where the complainant

represents himself, sometimes as a hindrance instead

of an aid to the judicial process, an award of fees does

nothing more than subsidize the litigant for his own

time and personal effort. Petitioner suffered from

spine injury and with this injury drafting the legal

document is extremely painful, no proper computer

table available to the petitioner,

k) Writs against Landlord respondents(ii)

30. Order the Landlord Atlantic to pay the

Petitioners Karupaiyan, RP and PP for

violating Conjugal/cohabiting rights.

Test-2: Due to Landlord ordered plaintiff to clean

lease expired/moved out apartment, which cause

separation of Petitioner Palani, RR. RP since Sep

2015. Landlord took under table money from

Jayabalan to occupy lease expired apartment.

Landlord is original wrongdoer.

Test-3: We all human beings and know pain

and suffering. Respondents including landlord hired

proxy people in India to file case in Indian S.Ct to

invalidate the law on which plaintiff got Indian family

consolidation order.

So petitioner(s) pray this Court 60 million dollar per

month to petitioners for separating petitioners and

violation of conjugal/cohabitation rights of the

petitioners.

31. Order the landlord to pay $250 per day for

illegally towing the camping Eurovan

Test-2: Before towing, Edison police offer told towing

agent that car is parked in private property and

should not be towed. There is Middlesex family Court

order with lien that Petitioner need to preserve the

car. The towing agency and landlord employee fill the

pocketed, towed Van and claiming that Van was

abandoned.

Test-3: Landlord wrongdoing is clear. Petitioner

home is evicted and homeless. If van would be with

petition, camp van should fill need of home evicted.

No home for years and sleep here & there. When

Corona attached, no place to take rest. Renting a

camper van cost $250/day.

5 years and 5 months. [5 x 365 + 150 days =1975

days]. 1975 * 250 =$493,750. So petitioner Landlord

should Court should order landlord to pay this money.

32. Order the each NJ Judicial authorities, NJ

and Middlesex county respondents to pay

$50 million for Children Education and

marriage expense

Test-2: Because Petitioner told his Wife Ramya to go

work for children educational and marriage expense,

these NJ judicial authorities entered FRO, filed fraud

consolidation order to prevent petitioner appeal,

denied petition with Judicial defect with their own

mistake in NJ S.Ct. These are illegal, jail able wrong

doing. Petitioner is head of family and nobody should

stand against petitioner when he take good decision

for family and children.

Test-3: Education cost money. Marriage cost money.

For Indian, cost of marriage is infinite. NJ Judicial

authorities ruled that NJ give $45 dollar marriage

license for unlimited sex which does not fit for this

petitioner or any one in Indian society. In India,

parents sell kidneys for marriage expense.

33.Order Ranjeeth to pay $600 million dollar to

the petitioner Karupaiyan.

Test-2; Purpose of black money transaction against

Govt of India, Ranjeeth filed/induced fake domestic

violence case and separated the family.

Test-3. Due to Ranjeeth’s wrong doing, petitioners

were separated, till today. Family matter, Kids

matter. Ramya’s Bank account has Ranjeeth’s black

money transaction.

34. Order to i) NJ that NJ should standardized

the NJ’s Municipal Mayors and councilmen‘s

salary.

Test-2: NJ municipal Mayor and Councilmen raise

their salary themselves.

Test-3: NJ Assembly men salary is standard thru

entire NJ. This year alone Jersey City mayor

increased his salary $50k.

35. Order that NJ Judicial authorities

respondents and Naga to pay $60 million per

months

violating

petitioners

conjugal/cohabiting rights.

Test-2: Naga and NJ judicial authorities filed fake

domestic violence case, filed fraud-on the

Court/judicial fraud consolidation order and

separated the petitioners till today.

Test-3: We all human being, know plain of

separating the family members, and kids.. Our fore

parents, and we run the family. These defendants

killed the children child hood in front of my eyes

which equal killed my children in front of my eyes.

Uncivilized street dogs do not allow anyone to touch

their bubbies. Even shot the dog, it carry the bullet

and defend the bubbies.

36. Order NJ govt/Middlesex County, NJ

Judicial authorities and Landlord to pay

following money for false arrest/false jailing.

Test-2: Once Petitioner was arrested falsely. Twice

petitioner was arrested and jailed falsely. NJ judicial

authorities denied appeal because of Judicial Fraud

consolidation order, petition with NJ S.Ct with the

own wrong of NJ S.Ct. Because of false, they decided

I should have sex with my wife, even after I got Indian

family Court consolidation order which is contempt of

Court.

Landlord is the original wrongdoer.

Test-3: Multiple times, falsely arresting.

Multiple times falsely jailing for i) petitioner canceled

child passport for prevent children abduction ii)

Petitioner told his wife that do not involve black

money transaction, do not take children to day time

parties, endanger them and go to work so need money

for children education and children marriage expense

which is unlimited/infinite, iii) Cleaned lease

expired/moved out apartment which was occupied by

Jayabalan who paid under table money to Landlord

to occupy apartment.

So petitioner pay this Court for order that each NJ,

Middlesex county, MARCIA SILVA,

CRAIG

CORSON, JERALD COUNCIL, STUART RABNER,

JAYNEE LA VECCHIA,

JUSTICE BARRY T.

ALBIN,

ANNE M. PATTERSON,

JUSTICE

FAUSTINO J. FERNANDEZ-VINA, JUSTICE LEE

A. SOLOMON,

WALTER F. TIMPONE, GLENN

GRANT, ALLISON E. ACCURSO,

PATRICK

DEALMEIDA, JOSEPH L. ANNOTTI, to pay $50

million for false arrest and $60 million for false

jailing.

Petitioner pay this Court for order that

landlord respondents to pay $500 million for false

arrest(s) and $750 million for false jailing.

37. Order that permanent protection order

against Khullars and Owner of Shalimar

Test-2: Rajesh Khullar, Raman Khullar, Tania

Khullar and Seth Latif owner of Shalimar hired by

these other respondents to kill the petitioners.

Test-3: This Court should grant protection order

against Rajesh Khullar, Raman Khullar, Tania

Khullar and Seth Latif and jail Khullars for 18 years.

These Khullars need to be deported to India so they

can practice upper caste Hinduism by drinking cow

urine.

38. Order that United States should enact

United States family

Test-2: When Entire United States, The family and

relationship between family numbers, Every State

have different family law. India, biggest democracy of

the world has family act/marriage act through India

when every state has different demography/diversity.

Based on marriage law, family properties are

attached to inheritance.

Test-3: Child Support Recovery Act (CSRA) ,

Respect

for

Marriage

Act is

there

for

unconventionally married people. Because majority

people married in traditional way the United States

should not ignore the traditional marriage of US

citizen. We are US citizen and family belong to the

United State. Parental rights are under 14th amend

of Constitution by , Troxel v. Granville. 530 U.S. 57

(2000) and Washington v. Glucksbers. 521 U. S. 702,

720. The States in United States have different family

law to do the different level of corruption. My son PP,

born from Little Rock, Arkansas and my daughter

born from Edison, NJ. Which states law applicable

and why should choose? Why the petitioner is not able

to choose? Family relationship is not shopping between

states. Respect for Marriage Act has Full Faith and

Credit Clause of the U.S. Constitution

39. Prose based additional relief(s)

Petitioner prays this Court for excuse if any

relief is duplicated, this Court should render best

justice to the prose petitioner for the best interest of

justice.

XII.

CONCLUSION

Petitioner(s) Palani Karupaiyan, PP, RP,

Santhosh Subramaniyan pray(s) the US Supreme

Court for the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari should

be granted.

Respectfully submitted.

lyjVT

Palani Karupaiyan, Pro se, Petitioner

1326 W William St, Philadelphia, PA 19132.

212-470-2048(m),palanikay@gmail.com

,1.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.