Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Courtney Green, Petitioner v. LG Electronics USA, et al.

Supreme Court, U.S.

FILED

NO. 23-1062

JUL 3 1 2023

-6200

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

In the Supreme Court of The United States

Courtney Green.

Petitioner,

V.

LG electronics USA Inc./LG electronics Inc.

Respondent.

On Petition For Writ of Certiorari to

the United states Court of Appeals For the

Petition for Writ of Certiorari

Courtney Green

P.O. Box 22444

Kansas city,MO 64113

1

Question Presented

Whether the respondent LG Electronics Inc. aided in corrupt intent and

racketeer influenced acts.These actions being undoubtedly ignored over a course of

time, prove to show signs of negligence and little to no remorse for the malice

bestowed upon the petitioner Courtney Green. At the expense of The petitioners

Character, were methods of unconsented surveillance in fact used to exploit,

defame, profit, control and gather personal data for ulterior motives?

Petition For Writ of Certiorari

Petitioner Courtney Green respectfully requests the issuance of a writ of certiorari

to review the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third

Circuit.

Decision Below

The decision of the district of New Jersey is published in the third circuit

2022.

The decision of the United States Court of appeals is published at the third

Circuit 2023.

Jurisdiction

Originally on 10/31/2022 The honorable Judge Susan D. Wigenton denied the appellees

informa application to proceed without payment ordered Case 22-06057 Green v. LG

Electronics USA Inc./LG Electronics be dismissed with prejudice. It was also implied in

the opinion of the courts that the appellee failed to state a valid argument in which relief

could be granted.The district of New Jersey Third Circuit entered judgment 12/14/2022

for dismissal deeming the amended complaint was insufficient in stating a claim upon

2

which relief may be granted because the claims outline do not permit to infer more than

the mere possibility of misconduct. A motion to vacate the order of dismissal and

reinstate was submitted to the district courts November 7,2022 and was denied when the

courts claimed the appellee still failed to state a valid argument in which relief could be

granted. A notice of appeal was filed with the New Jersey District Court January

10,2023. On june 8,2023 the The court of appeals for the third circuit ordered and

Adjudged that the decision of the New Jersey district court on January 4,2023 be

affirmed.

Federal Rule Involved

Due to a manufacturing error and defects in the design of the respondent

Lg electronics Inc. LG brand television media and network personnel were

able to openly use spyware and other methods of electronic surveillance to

collect data, eavesdrop and harass the petitioner; Enabling the act of

Invasion of Privacy through the disclosure of private facts and intrusion of

solitude, Illegal gathering and disbursement of private information.

Through this the electronic communications privacy act, the stored

communications act,consumer privacy protections act, the cybersecurity

information sharing act, as well as laws regarding racketeering,

exploitation, defamation of character,malice and non consensual rights were

violated.

Statement of Case

The respondent LG Electronics USA Inc./LG electronics Inc. Failed to

warn of possible electronic breach that lead to non consensual surveillance and

provided a platform/portal for Employees of the entertainment and media

3

industry to openly use methods of spyware and electronic surveillance to

monitor, listen,survell and attempt to converse with and continuously gather

and share data through the use of the television device capabilities. In doing

so, assailants were able to obtain television information such as model

number,Upc and other codes to track and collect viewing data and

manipulate and control viewing capabilities as well as limit viewing options

and even jam and disconnect network connections to specific network

channels.

Through this Design defect consecutively for 3 years beginning in 2020

Employees of the entertainment and media industry were able to use this

platform to openly monitor,exploit,defame and facilitate the exchange of

information to the masses for the purpose of malice towards the petitioner

therefore aiding in the act of Racketeering and corrupt intent.

I. Green’s circumstantial evidence shows that LG Electronics USA

inc./LG electronics Inc. provided a platform for networks and employees

of the entertainment and media industry to openly participate in the act

of racketeering, defamation of character, exploitation and non consensual

monitoring of the petitioners daily habits viewing data etc. for ulterior

motives and harassment.

During October of 2019 I began noticing that while watching television

shows employees of different television networks seem to look as if they

were attempting to converse with me, the plaintiff Courtney Green through

the television. This notion began while tuning into the espn show “highly

questionable” when sports analyst Mina Kimes stated “You're going to pay

for this” along with mentions of ratings. Also during Fox morning news in

early 2020, Tucker Carlson openly asked me if I felt helpless during a

political interview. Also around this time I tuned into talk shows where the

host would state things like, he’s under contract so everything's legal.

Following this while in between stable living I frequently visited a price

4

chopper and Hyvee off e 23rd street and another Hyvee off of noland rd in the

Independence, MO area on a daily and weekly basis. During this time I sat in

the eating area of these stores where there were 2 or more televisions mostly

on the sports and news channels.During the CBS morning show between the

dates 05/08/2020-02/13/202land hours of 6am-9am anchors acknowledged

that they could physically view me while live on air in various ways such as

acknowledging reactions to conversations and morning stories as well as

making jokes and laughing at me being seen and my living situation, stating

that I was homeless. During this time there were news stories hinting around

things that I was doing for example business endeavors I was pursuing at the

time such as a jewelry piece I was attempting to create via online which led

me to believe my online browsing was being monitored as well. One morning

while viewing this happening I stated out loud “Who do I talk to about this?”

referring to the viewing of my person through the television. Anchors and

host also conducted interviews and hosted virtual guest appearances where

host and guest would make direct and indirect comments about my person

while holding discussions; for example in one instance with Tyler Perry

where comments were made about me being a slave. Also during this time on

a daily basis I would also be in the sitting area during KCtv5 morning news

where anchors would make jokes, acknowledge they could see me and

implement information about my person into daily news stories and sketches.

While entering a Hyvee one day in September of 2020 a television was in

front of the entrance and the Live with kelly and

Ryan show was on and upon seeing me enter the store both host and co-host

Kelly ripa and Ryan seacrest tauntingly waved as I walked by the tv monitor.

Also during this time frame while eating in The Hyvee stores as well as the

Price chopper, I would watch the games and while doing so I would in some

5

form or fashion be acknowledged by sports commentators, the crowd and at

times the players in various ways. During this time frame I was often referred

to as 4. Between June of 2020 - February of 2021 I stayed in a variety of

Airbnb’s and a few hotels where a LG brand Television were also present.

During and around the time of the summer Olympics 07/23/202008/10/2020 host of this event began hinting and speaking of a dress tie

business endeavor I was pursuing, which led to pauses/delays in

communication and production with suppliers aiding in unfair business

practices. Also during the Olympics, there were other mentions of me, the

Plaintiff Courtney green with indirect comments and conversations about my

person.between the dates 05/27/2021-06/28/2021 a news anchor Gayle King

observed me tuning in to the show and shouted “What do you want?!” At that

time my server was disconnected and all viewing capabilities were disabled.

While live on CBS sports NFL season 2021 sports hosts on the show made

joking comments on and about my person laughing at different occurrences

happening at the time exchanging obtained information during on field

interviews and halftime shows. Also on CBS sports during the

DR. Pepper throw for free tuition challenge 12/04/2021 a sports anchor

referred To me as 4 and signally at that camera, also hinting at and making

verbal attempts at bribery towards participants stating “Remember we’ve

been giving you free money and paying for your school for x amount of

years”, after hearing rumors of a suit being filed.On the Late night show with

James Corden, during the dates 09/26/2021-12/21/2021 Host James Corden

made blatant direct and indirect comments on or about my person. Not only

acknowledging he could view me through the television in various ways

such as pointing to the tv as I flipped through the channels or as I tuned in,

carelessly participated in verbal abuse towards my person stating in one

instance and I quote “He’s a Bitch” he’s not going to do anything. During

this show host James Corden also referred to my business claiming that it

6

was just a “small business”. This misconduct was performed alone and with

nightly guest. Some guest even warned him that he could not do this to

people and that his behavior was unacceptable. The live in studio crowd

showed that they were displeased with this behavior and that it was having a

negative impact and less than enjoyable viewing experience. During the live

w Kelly and Ryan show, on consecutive morning airing of the show between

the dates of 09/20/2021-11/18/2021 Host Kelly Ripa along with co- host

Ryan acknowledge in one form or another that they could physically see me

through the tv by making direct and indirect comments about what I

currently was doing, wearing, things I had eaten etc. also making indirect

comments about my person such as financial status, state of mind (mainly

referring to my mental health) stating that I was crazy and going to need

therapy, living arrangements etc. This information was dispersed and

gathered forms of internet stalking and gathering of data, through in person

and virtual interviews at times referring to my person as 4. On the week of

Halloween there was a prop of a giant skeleton that was placed on the show

coincidently identical to the giant skeleton prop that was on a street that I

frequently walked down, on my daily route to the bus stop to further

acknowledge that there were tabs kept on or about my person. During these

occurrences, the live in studio crowd showed that they were displeased with

this behavior by the reactions on their faces. Kelly Ripa also hinted at this

behavior going on forever. One morning while viewing the show Host Kelly

Ripa and cohost were making jokes and poking fun while playing a prize

game on the show

with a call in viewer, she noticed what was happening and stated that she was

recording this airing. This also occurred on other occasions with other stand

in host also referring to me as 4. Also when Michael Strahan was a co- host

on the show in 2021 the viewing of my person was also taking place. During

the Drew Barrymore show between the dates 09/15/2021-11/15/2021, Drew

7

Barrymore as well as co host participated in jokingly comments on and about

my person and even added in a bit about previous clothing style options such

as green cargo pants that I had previously worn in the past amongst other

things. In one particular instance drew Barrymore was conversing with a

guest on the show and they begin joking things they had heard referring to

daily stalking/ following that was occurring at the time shouted looking

towards the camera and I quote “Go to the store”. This led me to believe there

were actual tabs being kept on me or video footage was being somehow

obtained in attempts to exploit and embarrass. In One instance between

September of 2021 and October of 2021 1 even shouted aloud “Turn this Shxt

off’ Showing my frustration regarding being constantly surveil. During fox

sports airing of the NFL season beginning in September of 2021 through

February of 2022 sports anchors acknowledged in one way or another that

they could see me through the tv. Through the season, Sports anchors and

reported participated in at time jokingly behavior towards my person through

player interviews amongst each other and during the halftime segments.

Between weeks 12-15 sports anchor Michael Strahan asked for this behavior

to stop because the viewing experience was becoming less enjoyable and he

saw that these actions were having a negative affect and they could get in

trouble. During the month of December of 2021 I began attempting to pursue

legal actions pertaining to this matter and somehow the employees of the

appellee Fox Corporation heard of this and began talks about it in attempts to

figure out if they were liable for the behavior displayed; stating things like

“He has no proof’, “He won’t win by his self’, “Guys Fox Corporate in New

York is watching. On Ozark fox KolrlO around 10 pm after the viewings of

the NFL Sunday night games reporters implemented outsourced information

on or about my person into news stories as well as acknowledging that they

could see me, attempting to converse with me as I viewed. Also on Ozarks

first between the months (10/11/2021-11/27/2021) a meteorologist from the

8

show during a morning segment made joking comments about the situation

acknowledging that he could see me and attempted to bring this to the studios

attention by hinting at things that had been occurring over the past few

months. There were also mentions of the viewing of me through the

television during the 2021 American Music Awards and grammys.During the

2021 Airing of Dancing with the stars there were hints that I could be seen

through the television and even could be seen how this situation not only

affected me but was in some form or fashion affecting performances and the

entertainers as well on this show as well as other programs. I began the

process of pursuing legal proceedings against Television networks in late

November, Host of the show Dancing with the stars stated “Can't get a hold

of your lawyers, They're all busy” in a taunting fashion further alerting me

that I was not only being monitored through means of television but my

online browsing data was being stalked or somehow obtained as well. Also

during this timeframe I would see mimics or duplication of meals that I had

cooked or mentions of certain ingredients used in the preparation process

which further raised suspicion that I was being surveil and continuously

stalked and that this surveillance was used to study me as if I was a test

subject. While flipping through the channels landing on HSN and QVC there

would be mentions, one in particular being about an issue with food that I

was consuming being tampered with. A lady in a yellow dress suit and a

white hat stated “This is the perfect cover up because all the evidence is

gone” referring to the food being eaten. I have also reached out to the proper

organization concerning this issue.on local KOlr-10 new in Springfield, Mo

during the month of November 2021 a meteorologist of a Saturday morning

airing went on a rant about how he could physically view me and how this

has been going on for a while hinting at different events that have taking

place while I had been in that viewing area. Also on this local news station on

Sunday nights after the nfl games between October 2021 through December

9

2021 lady anchors attempted to converse with me on several occasions also

acknowledging they could view me through the television. All these actions

aided in the continuous following of my person through grocery stores,

shopping malls/stores and daily commutes. During the months of November

2021 through January 2022 Around the time I began pursuing legal

proceeding against Television networks, shows begin airing segments where

in some form or fashion I would be told to leave or during the show it would

be recommended that I be kicked out. This is another way of how the cyber

breach was used as a mentally persuasive platform to carry out ulterior

motives. I also wrote a complaint to the CBS network via there online portal

regarding the viewing of my person through the television as well as

explaining the incidents that had occured the week of February 28,2022 and

have received no reply. Between the dates of 10/03/2021- 12/06/2021 host

Jenna and Hoda of the Today show observed me sleeping between the 4am

and 5am hour and attempted to wake me up by joking and laughing stating

“wake up”, he’s homeless etc. The statement of my living situation have

happened in other instances on the show as well. On Today 3rd hour between

the dates 10/03/2021- 11/24/2021 I tuned into the show and observed not all

but some of the host holding conversations along with implemented

information about financial status along with other personal information

mentioned in sketches and stories. In one instances a host stated and I quote

“ now that quality reporting” jokingly laughing. Also on NBC mornings

during this same time period between the hours of 5am -8am , host Laughed

when I tuned into the show co hosting with an news anchor that also appears

on Newsy Morning rush which I also have a similar open case with the

Scripps network (Case: 1:22-cv-00009-TSB-SKB) hinting that they could

physically view me. One news anchor stated and I quote “no one is watching

you right now”. During this show information was implemented into news

stories such as things hinting around my ethnicity and an anchor out in the

10

field stated that “the only way to beat 4 is to stay ahead of em”. Also on this

same airing day Anchors spoke with another coworker who was abroad in

Beijing and they laughed because they aided in manipulating inconvenient

business endeavors that were happening that they had a hand in creating.

During the week of 11/10/2021-11/15/2021Andrew Yang appeared as a guest

on newsy tonight while conversing with a newsy in studio reporter, made

direct and indirect comments one amongst others stating and I quote “I know

you just applied for a call center position”. These occurrences have also

been mentioned in other case filings Green v. NBC Universal Media

Entertainment Inc. usca 22-722 and Courtney Green v. Scripps Corporate

Headquarters, l:22-cv-00009-TSB-SKB. On this day an over the counter

prescription drug Ivermectin was mentioned. While tuning in to the

television app plutotv while viewing a movie the app would cut to

commercial and It would show the same news anchor that had been

conspiring with NBC and the app would often crash, close out or have a

viewing delay. During the 2021 NFL football Season 09/09/2021-01/08/2022

anchors of NBC Sports participated in joking about viewing me through the

television implementing things they had seen or heard into discussions

amongst each other before games and during halftime shows or interviews

with players which spiraled into ongoing controversy weekly. After hearing

that legal actions were taken against them, the host and anchors made claims

that I had no proof. During week 13-16 an sports anchor stated and I quote “

we should have never let him score” and another stated that he could clearly

see me. At times even the sports crowd reacted with looks of disapproval for

the behavior occurring making it a less enjoyable viewing experience. On

12/31/2021 during the Miley Cyrus and Pete Davidson New year’s eve Party

airing on NBC Miley Cyrus acknowledged that she could see me and stated

that I was sitting on my couch alone and joked about me not having friends

amongst other things. In December of 2021 I filed lawsuits against the

11

I

following television networks Fox Corporation,NBCUniversal Media LLC,

I

ABC Entertainment Inc,Viacom CBS as well as Scripps Corporation with

mentions of these actions as well as others; along with claims of Negligence

in addressing this situation I also submitted subpoenas to the courts for theses

incidents. Following my initial lawsuit filings Employees of the television

industry began using this platform to alert the masses of legal actions being

taken against them, further indicating that various forms of stalking were in

fact occurring. I would watch a television show or movie through an app

such as Hulu, netflix,Peacock or tubi and those actors would appear as guests

on talk shows or on late night shows which further indicated that my viewing

data was being monitored and tracked.Also during the 2021 Emmy awards

there were further acknowledgments that I was being viewed through the

television as well as clear indications that the viewing and monitoring of my

person was being exploited through the film industry and made out as a

mockery. During the Emmy’s one actor while delivering a speech stated in a

taunting mocking manner this is what it looks like to win.Since then, these

incidents have continued and escalated while watching tv on other television

brands so I the plaintiff Courtney Green wrote complaints to television

manufactures LG Electronics USA and LG Electronics Inc. via letter,

complaint portal and via email. I also submitted a complaint to the

department of consumer affairs.

II. The United States Court of Appeals third Circuit Ruled the Case be

dismissed because it was insufficient in stating a claim upon which relief

may be granted because the claims outline do not permit to infer more

than the mere possibility of misconduct.

12

Failure toWarn

A product can also be considered “defective” under the New Jersey

Products Liability Act if it doesn’t contain adequate safety instructions or

warnings which are necessary to alert people of dangerous consequences of

certain uses or applications of the product. Just because the product contains a

safety warning doesn’t mean the product isn’t defective! A warning must be

“adequate” according to New Jersey Products Liability Claim laws,rules and

statue, meaning that the warning must be carefully worded and specifically

illustrate and explain the dangers of certain product applications.

Defects in Design

A company’s liability for a design defect occurs when there was a

foreseeable risk posed by the product when the product was manufactured as

intended and used for its intended purposes. In this instance the petitioner has

shown that the risk could have been reduced or avoided by the adoption of a

reasonable alternative design, which was:

• Feasible, in other words, the manufacturer had the ability to produce it;

• Economically feasible, in other words, it would not cost too much to make the

product with the modification;

• Not in opposition to the product's intended purpose, in other words, the

product would still perform the function for which it was created.

13

I raise the theory that The defendant-appellee LG Electronics Inc. was

negligent in retrospect to the fact that the manufacturer knew or should have

known of the risk associated with its product. Which provokes me to question

the conduct of LG Electronics Inc. in regards to analyzing its manufacturing

strategies regarding product safety and furthermore if this was a blatant

convenient error in judgment chosen to satisfy a profit margin. Was this

option more lucratively beneficial instead of taking extra precaution in

closely examining all other alternatives to further prevent potential cyber

breaches and security risk? Was the Respondent presented a safer option but

the modification perhaps caused potential conflict with projected electronic

upgrades. Even after taking steps to combat said breaches such as

rebooting/manufacture resetting electronic television devices, opting

out/disabling audio and camera capabilities, disabling data tracking options,

the plaintiff-appellant was still a victim of these defects. While

acknowledging this defect, it was also exploited by tv personnel on multiple

occasions showing that this breach was publicly known worldwide and was

still neglected to be addressed by any entity in any form; But instead

conveniently used to exploit, monitor, study and note ones personnel

behavior,habits, character,comings and goings whereabouts, viewing data

and personnel preference.

What is electronic surveillance?

Electronic surveillance is a broad term used to describe when someone watches

another person’s actions or monitors a person’s conversations without his/her

knowledge or consent by using one or more electronic devices or platforms. In a

relationship where there is domestic violence or stalking, an abuser may use

14

recording and surveillance technology to “keep tabs” on you (the victim) by

monitoring your whereabouts and conversations. The motive for using electronic

surveillance may be to maintain power and control over you, to make it hard for

you to have any privacy or a life separate from the abuser, and/or to try to

discover (and stop) any plans you may be making to leave the abuser.

Electronic surveillance can be done by misusing cameras, recorders, wiretaps,

social media, or email. It can also include the misuse of monitoring software (also

known as spyware), which can be installed on a computer, tablet, or a smartphone

to secretly monitor the device activity without the user’s knowledge. Spyware can

allow the abusive person access to everything on the phone, as well as the ability to

intercept and listen in on phone calls.

If the person is not part of the activity or conversation:There are several criminal

laws that address the act of listening in on a private conversation,

electronically recording a person’s conversation, or videotaping a person’s

activities. The names of these laws vary across the country, but they often include

wiretap, voyeurism, interception, and other recording laws. When deciding

which law(s) may apply to your situation, this may often depend on the

circumstances of the surveillance and whether you had a “reasonable expectation of

privacy” while the abuser recorded or observed you. Legally, a reasonable

expectation of privacy exists when you are in a situation where an average person

would expect to not be seen or spied on.l For example, a person in certain public

places such as in a football stadium or on a main street may not reasonably have an

expectation of privacy, but a person in his/her bedroom or in a public restroom stall

generally would.

lSee Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967) (noting that “what a person

knowingly exposes to the public, even in his own home or office, is not a

15

subject of Fourth Amendment protection. But what he seeks to preserve as

private, even in an area accessible to the public, may be constitutionally

protected.”)

What is spyware?

Spyware is monitoring software that can be used to secretly monitor a device’s

activity

without the user’s knowledge. Spyware can be installed on a:

• computer;

• tablet;

• smartphone; or

• other devices.

Spyware can allow an abuser access to everything on your device, as well as the

ability to record and listen in on phone calls or other communications. Spyware

software may be hidden on a device, and generally does not give a notification that

the software has been installed or is in use. It can be hard to find spyware once it is

installed and also hard to remove from a device.

• Due to electronic errors in Lg brand device Spyware was used to gain

access into the appellants dwelling place monitor, eavesdrop and gather

i

private and personal data without his knowledge and/or against consent.

• It was also shown how these methods were used to control,intercept,interrupt and

disconnect television and app services as well.

Sec. 250.45

Unlawful Surveillance in the Second Degree

A person is guilty of unlawful surveillance in the second degree when:

16

1. For his or her own, or another person's amusement,

entertainment, or profit, or for the purpose of degrading or abusing a

person, he or she intentionally uses or installs, or permits the

utilization or

installation of an imaging device to surreptitiously view, broadcast or

record a person dressing or undressing or the sexual or other intimate

parts of such person at a place and time when such person has a

reasonable expectation of privacy, without such person's knowledge or

consent;

2. For his or her own, or another individual's amusement,

entertainment, profit, sexual arousal or gratification, or for the

purpose of degrading or abusing a person, the actor intentionally uses

or installs or permits the utilization or installation of an imaging

device to surreptitiously view, broadcast, or record such person in an

identifiable manner:

l

- For the purposes of this subdivision, when a person uses or installs, or

permits the utilization or installation of an imaging device in a bedroom,

changing room, fitting room, restroom, toilet, bathroom, washroom,

shower or any room assigned to guests or patrons in a hotel, motel or inn,

there is a rebuttable presumption that such person did so for no legitimate

Purpose; or Without the knowledge or consent of a person,

- at a place and time when such person has a reasonable expectation

of privacy, without such person's knowledge or consent.

17

Unlawful surveillance in the second degree is a class E felony.

• Methods ofsurveillance were used to obtain private, personal information and data

about the appellant and openly share these findings with associates for exploitation

purposes, as well as amusement and defamation. Throughout the course of this issue it

has been shown how this malfunction was used to surveil, harass, humiliate,stalk and

cause intentional malice. Through this television malfunction tv network personnel were

able to openly view, monitor the appellant in real time while collecting and noting daily

habits, viewing data and other finding at their convenience which would have otherwise

been private and are meant to be

Private.

• Through this television malfunction These findings were also used to inspire show

criteria, the creation and innovation of new revenue streams such as new shows and

ideas, products, services etc. further exhibiting the true ulterior motive of

exploitation, corrupt intent and racketeer influenced acts.

Non-consensual monitoring and surveillance of someone

-Installation of Viewing Device

• This element means that you either physically installed a viewing device yourself, or

had someone install a viewing device on your behalf. A key part of this element is that you

installed this viewing device without providing notice or obtaining the consent of the

viewer or recorded person.

- This method of concealed surveillance, monitoring and data tracking was

unknown to the appellant until television personnel alerted the appellant of this

matter showing that this was unknown and non consensual. The appellant made

several attempts to alert networks/broadcasters of the monetary issue and was

ignored and the problem was neglected. The petitioner also reached out to

18

I

consumer affairs regarding the monitoring and data problem and still saw no

resolution. In 2022 the appellant reached out personally to the Respondent LG

electronics inc. and still received no response.

Reasonable Privacy

• The definition ofElement 3 is the installation of the viewing device in a place where the

viewer or recorded person had a reasonable expectation ofprivacy.

• This element means that the viewing or recording device was set up in a place where

the recorded person felt that they could undress privately. This includes private

residences, but also places that are generally expected to be private, such as bathrooms

and changing rooms.

- It was stated through the documents title “Statement of Facts” how the appellant

frequented different Airbnb’s and hotels while either traveling or in between homes

and observed tv personnel openly stating in real time his whereabouts or

things/objects seen in the background of the room etc. While in a private residence

where only his person was residing.

S 250.55, which covers the dissemination of an unlawful surveillance image in the

second degree. This covers intentionally distributing an image that was obtained

through unlawful surveillance, as defined above.

S 250.60 It applies to anyone who is convicted of disseminating unlawful

surveillance images more than once in a ten year period.

This applies to any time an image or video that was knowingly obtained through

unlawful surveillance changes hands between two or more people. Any time you

share, post, or otherwise spread the image, and you are liable for the dissemination

of unlawful surveillance images.

19

Eavesdropping

-The definition of eavesdropping is intentionally overhearing or recording a

conversation without consent, by means of a mechanical device.

Eavesdropping means any time that you intentionally access a private conversation

between two or more people. This can mean the interception of electronic

communications, like emails, texts, or phone calls, but it can also refer to recording

conversations two people have in person with a reasonable expectation of privacy.

• Since 2020 up to the present year of2023, there has been a constant and gradual

chain of events that show that several methods were used to carry out the act of

eavesdropping. It was stated on numerous occasions that the monitoring of my

person has been occurring unknowingly for an additional 10-12 years. Through this

malfunction the appellee has enabled assailants/oppressors to carry out countless

acts of malice that has undoubtedly affected and in many ways impacted the course

of my life.

• On countless occasions tv personnel openly exhibited how numerous methods of

eavesdropping were executed while taking advantage of this neglected television

malfunction. Through this monetary method tv personnel were able openly view the

appellants personal life at their leisure, openly broadcast these personal findings to

multiple viewing networks, openly intrude on private matters by encouraging scenarios,

recommending and insisting actions. Through this electronic error the appellant was

individually targeted, controlled and used to gather insight and avoid recourse. Through

this manufacturing error the appellee enabled broadcasting networks unlimited access

which has accumulated profit in numerous ways and has been used to manipulate

outcomes in there favor and gradually gain and obtain electronic control through study

20

!

CBS USCA 22-724)

• Also by disconnecting me from local viewing programs in attempts to cover up

actions instead of addressing incidents, made me feel singled out and purposely

Targeted.

• There has been ongoing taunting through methods of implemented show criteria

commercials as well as through the altering of and hidden messages of app titles

and readings etc.

Reasons For Granting the Writ

The court should grant Writ of Certiorari in this case because the

manufacturing defects enabled the networks and personnel from media and

entertainment industry to carry out organized plots and racketeer influenced

acts.

The court should grant review in this case to oversee lawful integrity, examine

factual findings that further exhibit a collective working in regards to relative

cases regarding similar incidents. Weighing whether these actions were

intentional and meant to target and cause unforeseen hardship and/or Malice to

the petitioner. Furthermore, to examine the question of how this breach in

privacy happened, why the petitioner is being targeted and lastly why after 3

years and after numerous warnings from employee personnel as well as the

petitioner has the respondent nor any of its counterparts of partnerships

neglected to come forth to acknowledge the situation or work to end this

electronic breach or address is manufacturing defect. With no response to

complaints from The petitioner nor attempts to find a way to end the

surveillance and correct behavior, these neglected actions have led to escalated

matters that the respondent LG electronics USA Inc./LG Electronics Inc. can

now not control which is why they are in fact liable. Taking into consideration

the fiscal evidence stated outlining the harassing circumstances repeatedly

22

endured over the course of time, not only degrade and undermine the value of

one's person but display these methods were in many ways used in attempts to

conform and control the petitioners way of thinking and living. Repeated

occurrences of similar incidents abandon the thought of coincidence and raise

the suspicion of orchestrated plots. These chain of events along with the shown

repetitive occurrence show that the petitioner was indeed targeted and these

methods collectively aided in calculated misfortunes and clearly exhibits how

easily information can be used to derail/delay and negatively impact someone's

life if cyber security goes unaddressed. The show of consistency further proves

that These events could only be carried out by careful planning and some form

of studying one's habits. Information being exploited could only be obtained

through the breach of cyber data and/or the physical viewing thereof. It is

shown, The petitioner Courtney Green showed without doubt that actions were

taken to stop this situation through legal measures as well as reaching out

personally to the respondent Lg electronics Inc.. Due to the case being

dismissed, I fear the bigger picture is being overlooked. USCA 23-1062 Green

V. LG Electronics USA Inc./LG Electronics Inc. is one of many similar filings

that are connected to racketeer- influenced acts, exploitation, defamation,

malice and invasion of privacy. This makes it a vital portion and very much

relevant.

Conclusion

The petitioner Courtney Green respectfully asks that the court issue a Writ

of Certiorari in United States Court of Appeals case 23-1062 Green v. LG

Electronics USA Inc./LG Electronics Inc.

Respectfully Submitted,

Courtney Green

Petitioner

P.o. Box 22444

Kansas City, Mo 64113

23