Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Adesijuola Ogunjobi, Petitioner v. United Nations, et al.

Supreme Court briefNov 29, 2021

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

•s

■y

•A- No.

3n ®je

Supreme Court, U.S.

FILED

Supreme Court of tfie Unite!) States

NOV 1 9 2021

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

ADESIJUOLA OGUNJOBI,

Petitioner.

UNITED NATIONS, et al.,

Respondents.

ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF

APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

ADESIJUOLA OGUNJOBI

P.O. BOX 56454

JACKSONVILLE, FL 32241

(904) 894-1466

RECEIVED

DEC 3 - 2021

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

Whether the Fourth Circuit erroneously held, district court has the absolute

authority to dismiss a valid complaint on its own without allowing summons to be

served defendants which requires response.

‘

PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDINGS

Petitioner, plaintiff-appellant below, is Adesijuola O. Ogunjobi.

Respondents, defendants-appellees below in this Court is United Nations,

World Health Organizations, Centers For Disease Control and Prevention.

Other plaintiffs-appellants below, are Toks Banc Corp, Toks Banc Corp, Toks,

5 World Markets Corporation, World Markets Transfer Agency Corporation, Global

Prosperity Corporation, 5 World Market Tickets, United States of America, The

People’s Republic of China, Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC),

Treasury Department of the United States, Federal Reserve Board of the United

States, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, Commonwealth of Virginia, Virginia

Retirement System, International Olympic Committee, Association of Tennis

Professionals, Women’s Tennis Professionals, International Tennis Federation,

National Football League, National Basketball Association, Major League Baseball,

Major League Soccer, Donald J. Trump, Melania Trump, Charles, Prince of Wales,

Idris Elba, Sabrina Dhowre Elba, Dak Prescot, Brian Allen, Madonna Louise

Ciccone, The Cincinnati Insurance Company, Democratic Party, Republican Party,

Members of the Class and Subclasses and Those Similarly Situated.

Other defendants-appellees via amendment below, are Ralph Northam, Mark

Herring, Ronald Schmitz, O’Kelly E. McWilliams, III, Joseph W. Montgomery, J.

Brandon Bell, II, John Bennett. Michael Dasharoon, William Garrett, Susan

Gooden, W. Brett Hayes and Troilen Gainey Seward.

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Adesijuola O. Ogunjobi is an individual, an entrepreneur with no parent

corporation and no stock.

iii

r•

RELATED PROCEEDINGS

Ogunjobi v. Northam et al (now amended to Toks Banc Corp et al u. United

Nations et al), No. 3:21-CV-392, United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, Richmond Division (Pending for full prosecution).

TABLE OF CONTENTS

QUESTIONS PRESENTED..........................................

PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDINGS............................. ........................................... n

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT.................. ....................................... in

RELATED PROCEEDINGS..................................

,1V

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES........................................

OPINIONS BELOW.........................................

JURISDICTION..........................................................................................................

STATUTORY PROVISION INVOLVED.............

INTRODUCTION.......................................................

STATEMENT.......................................................... ^."^"^"^"’""""^"'""1"’

A. Judicial Immunity.............................................................................

B. Merit of A Complaint................................................................................

C. Subject Matter Jurisdiction........................................................................... 9

D. COVID-19 Class Action To Be Prosecuted..................................................

E. $40 Billion Secured Via COVID-19 Class Action Challenge Concert....... 9

F. Millions Are Dying......................

G. Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh Hearings..................................... 11

H. I am Vaccinated You Dumb F*ck................................................................. 12

REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION......................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

THIS COURT SHOULD ONCE AND FOR ALL RESOLVE THE ISSUE

IF A COMPLAINT (VALIDITY NOT AN ISSUE) CAN BE DISMISSED

BY A SITTING JUDGE WITHOUT OPPOSING PARTIES BEING

SERVED SUMMONS TO RESPOND.............

II. PETITION CLAUSE......................................................................

III. AMENDED COMPLAINT........................................ .......................................... 14

IV. THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION GRANTS AUTHORITY TO THIS

COURT TO REVERSE......................................................................................... 17

V. THE ISSUE IS NOT COVID-19 IS REAL ISSUE IS IF COVID-19 TURNS

OUT TO BE A SCAM OR TOTAL GLOBAL FRAUD.

CONCLUSION.....................

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit...............

APPENDIX B: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia

APPENDIX C: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit...................... C

APPENDIX D: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia....D

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

CASES

Bush v. Gore,

531 U.S. 98 (2000)

Dred Scott v. Sanford

60 U.S. 393 (1857).

Goldsmith v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore,

845 F.2d 61 (4th Cir. 1988..................................

Hansberry u. Lee,

311 U.S. 32 (1940)

Harris u. Harvey,

605 F. 2D 330 (7* Cir. 1979)

Lovern v. Edwards,

190 F.3d 648, 654 (4* Cir. 1999)

McDonald v. Smith,

472 U.S. 479 (1985)

Mireles v. Waco,

502 U.S. 9, 13 (1991)

Ogunjobi v. Northam, et al

Supreme Court of Virginia v. Consumers Union

446 U.S. 719 (1980)............................................ !

Stump v. Sparkman,

435 U.S. 349 (1978)

Toks Banc Corp, et al v. United Nations, et al

United States v. Shipp,

203 U.S. 563 (1906)

Yates v. Village Hoffman Estates, Illinois,

209 F. Supp. 755 (N.D. Ill. 1962)

CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS

Article III

UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION

Article VIII, Section 29

STATUTES

28 U.S.C. § 1254(1)..........................................................................

Judicial Conduct and Disability Act 1980 (“Act”), 28 §§ 351-364

RULE

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(b)

vii

PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Adesijuola Ogunjobi respectfully petitions for a writ of certiorari to review

the judgment in this case of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth

Circuit.

OPINIONS BELOW

There’s no opinion from the Fourth Circuit, only issued an order to affirm

illegal ’ order of the District Court and not even published.

JURISDICTION

The Fourth Circuit Court affirmed the order to dismiss with prejudice the

class action the second time without allowing summons served the defendants of the

lawsuit filed against respondents on September 15, 2021. The Fourth Circuit

remanded the case back to dismiss without prejudice the first time the district court

dismissed the complaint six days after it was filed on January 12, 2021 when the

first appeal was made.

This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1254(1).

STATUTORY PROVISION INVOLVED

There’s no known statute that gives the district court to dismiss a complaint

on its own without due process like summons being served to opposing parties to

respond and seek dismissal under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(b).

Article VIIII, Section 29 of the Convention has mitigated the de facto

immunity of United Nations against lawsuit which governs any party can compel

United Nations to appear in court as a “party” for certain appearances.

INTRODUCTION

At issue here is does the district court have the authority to dismiss a

complaint on its own without due process where summons is not even allowed to be

served the defendants. Irony here is the defendants never set a foot in the

courtroom to be allowed to defend themselves, the judge did all the work for them

which lacks any strong defense. And Fourth Circuit affirming with no known

statutes to sustain an order not supported by statutes or case laws that give a

sitting judge to dismiss a complaint on its own without summons served to

defendants. The dismissal is with prejudice” meaning the judge felt anything about

COVID-19 is true with no scintilla of evidence to sustain the veracity of COVID-19,

which is nonsense. COVID-19 is BOGUS, a total SCAM that must be exposed and

abolished just like slavery was abolished when people reminded “slave owners”

“human beings” were not property you could buy and sell. Time out. Time out.

Why there are no statutes that sustain the full autonomy of district court to

act carte blanche to dismiss a complaint on their own is because to mitigate judicial

corruption. If any judge can just dismiss a complaint on his own just like that, then

the legal system is a total “farce.” That’s exactly what Henry Hudson, the district

court judge did when the COVID-19 CLASS ACTION CHALLENGE was filed on

June 1, 2020 and dismissed on June 9, 2021 “with prejudice” and the order was

blatant racist and laced with, errors that shouldn’t have never been written by a

sitting judge which sustains when racism and bigotry rear their ugly heads, there’s

nothing smart about it and never addressed the challenge of COVID-19 and the

order never educated the public COVID-19 is real opposing the class action

challenging the veracity of COVID-19. The reason why the order from district court

has no known information COVID-19 is real and the complaint challenging the

veracity of COVID-19 can be dismissed is because (interestingly) or ironically the

judge never allowed summons served which would have required defendants to

respond and outline why COVID-19 is real thus sustaining their own motion to

dismiss which would have guided the court which is now serving as the platform

courts must relied on both sides before making decisions. Just dismissing a

complaint because a judge feels like doing so is not supported by any statutes.

Fourth Circuit first remanded the case back on January 12, 2021 during the

appellate process, it recommended the complaint to be dismissed without prejudice

after filings with the appeals court that summons must be allowed to be served

within 90 days the complaint is filed. The Fourth Circuit should have reversed

based on complaint cannot be dismissed solely by a judge playing judge, defense

attorney and jury. The attitude of Fourth Circuit is racist as well because everyone

knows the complaint was filed by a black man based on the name. Racism, bigotry

is based on names, origin, color of the skin, ethnicity, accents, dialects, etc.

Courts across the country are also engaging in their own “ugliness”

promoting COVID-19, a scam. This very Court was ugly during the Dred Scott case

see Dred Scott u. Sanford 60 U.S. 393 (1857) when the all white justices (7-2) used

that forum to label black people inferior via opinion delivered by Roger Toney for

the majority. People loved to invoke Dred Scott, but never, never outlined to the

next generation the Court declared black people inferior which is total delusion

because the interpretation of delusion is: “a person that believes in something that

is false” which is what COVID-19 is all about. That’s why both Henry Hudson and

the Fourth Circuit looked down on another black man dismissing a complaint

without summons served, and allowing to retain attorneys as well. Now we know

why some people want no one around them based on bogus guidelines of COVID-19

scam. Well don’t eat, shower, brush your teeth, etc., because at the end of the day

humans are putting together everything for other humans to survive on, not the

bogus COVID-19.

STATEMENT

Is COVID-19 issue before this Court or the issue with a sitting judge to

dismiss a complaint without defendants being served summons and Fourth Circuit

supporting such egregious act that has no place in civilized society. The day we

allow judges to dismiss cases on their own, then there’s no legal system.

COVID-19 is not the issue here, period. COVID-19 will be prosecuted to

declare it a scam. Judicial corruption is at the core of this appeal from both Fourth

Circuit and District Court based on one notion the “black face” behind the complaint

is the wrong color that must be replaced by “white face.” People are naive how

racism and bigotry work. It is ugly. Fourth Circuit to affirm is affirming racism and

bigotry of a sitting judge that engaged in racism and bigotry not the rule of law. The

order appealed for the second time cried out loud plaintiff must be denied

application of informal pauperis when plaintiff paid all its fees back then. A country

facing trillions in bills tied to COVTD-19 scam, funding bogus vaccines disguised as

“good deeds”1 and a sitting judge is screaming a statute to deny any in forma

pauperis application. Talk about an officer of the court with no virtues, values and

total lack of character and candor. This is a disgrace. Henry Hudson has no values,

period. Law enforcement agencies in the United States will tell this Court the

amount of scams people have orchestrated under COVID-19 scam is staggering.

Call it sub-COVID-19 scams because COVID-19 is a scam on its own. Now you got

vaccine manufacturers looking at $12 trillion in annual sales via force, intimidation,

etc. As usual, protect the few to make all the trillions at the expense of others just

like Slavery, Holocaust, Great Depression, etc.

The issue before this Court is not COVID-19, because this Court and all

Courts have no information COVID-19 is real, only manipulation, brainwash,

paranoia and total delusion promoting COVID-19 and which is the reason COVID19 Class action was filed to challenge it, ask questions, compel the defendants to

show up and demonstrate including the bogus vaccine, what’s in the vaccine. Props

like a man wearing a body suit, with mask on the face and gloves in hands and

holding a tube gazing at it is just total nonsense. The test2 is just another quack.

1 The phrase: “No good deeds go unpunished” doesn’t even apply here because an act must be

considered to be “good deeds” before such phrase could be applied.

2 Associate Justice of the Supreme Court Neil Gorsuch tested "negative" for COVID-19 which is hilarious because

the cowards behind this COVID-19 scam will use this as a weapon to control people. They will control Supreme

The issue here is clear, does a judge has the right to deny a litigant access to the

legal system by just arbitrarily dismissing complaint within days it was filed.

A. Judicial Immunity

Before this Court can view judicial immunity, one must consider what

qualifies for “judicial immunity” here? Judicial immunity does not cover judges, only

covers litigants. Litigants file lawsuits and lawsuits shape society, public policy, and

attitude. Without lawsuits, judges won’t have jobs, period. The beneficiaries of

lawsuits are litigants---including the public, not judges. So, for a judge to toss out a

complaint on his own without due process and applying judicial immunity to do so is

disingenuous. Judges must follow the rule of law, Canons rules, high standards and

resist temptation of bias. That’s why judicial immunity is for litigants. Judges that

have received threats from angry people is based on cases they preside on, not

because they re judges. Never. Time to revisit judicial immunity here that even if a

litigant files a ridiculous complaint, out of this world, at the end of the day,

summons must be issued, served and then the opposing party gets the opportunity

to seek dismissal under the rule of law. That’s judicial immunity. Henry Hudson’s

violation of the any statutes that support due process under litigation doesn’t

support Judicial Immunity. Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978) only sustains

“decision made in the course of duties,” to absolve the judge when an adult female

found out a judge granted her mother’s request to have a tubal ligation to be

Court because all they need to do is declare one associate "positive" and must stay home for 14 days, etc. COVID19 is a scam, a global nuisance and everybody will pay for it just like the saying by the Yorubas in Nigeria: "The Sky

is falling is not a one man's problem" because everyone is underneath the sky. Everybody will pay dearly for this

scam, period. No one is immune. Next Justice will be positive because they need to balance their scam.

performed on her when she was 15, again sustains the ruling of the Supreme Court

is actually the mother’s right to protect her daughter, never about the judge even

though the litigant as an adult sued the judge as opposed to suing her mother

because at the end of the day judicial immunity is for litigants because the judge did

not go to the mother’s house and demanded the child’s mother must undergo tubal

ligation, mother initiated it. Enough of delusion, judicial immunity is for litigants,

not judges.

Mireles u. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 13 (1991), which the judge was angry a public

defender refused to show up in court when other litigants are already arrived for

the proceedings. The outcome of a case has no bearing on the judge, but litigants.

Henry Hudson did not make the decision in the course of duties, colluded with

individuals that are not party to the action and denying the public to give

defendants to present their own facts and evidence COVID-19 is real. Suppressing

evidence or engaging in misconduct is not protected by judicial immunity, even if

such immunity is for litigants as opposed to the misconception immunity is for

judges. Furthermore, litigants are not children and opposing parties wouldn’t want

a sitting judge doing their job for them, some litigants will actually tell a judge they

can take care of themselves which is even more ironic.

Supreme Court of Virginia v. Consumers Union, 446 U.S. 719 (1980) is a case

Supreme Court decided Supreme Court of Virginia and its chief justice did not have

immunity from suit because the lawsuit against them is based on “unconstitutional”

statute which the district court ruled for the plaintiffs.

Yates v. Village Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 209 F. Supp. 755 (N.D. Ill. 1962)

held that not every action by a judge is in the exercise of his judicial function...it is

not a judicial function for a judge to commit an intentional tort even though the tort

occurs in the courthouse. When a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when the

judge does not follow the law, the judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and the

judges’ orders are void, of no legal force or effect.”

Harris v. Harvey 605 F.2D 330 (7™ Cir. 1979) is a classic example

judicial immunity applies to litigants, not judges. Even though the Court ruled

racial prejudice are not judicial function just like Henry Hudson based his whole

attitude a black man filed COVID-19 Class Action, the litigant that initiated the

COVID-19 Class Action is protected under such judicial immunity to bring the case

to the Court for prosecution by attorneys and if funds will be raised to cover all legal

costs, that’s the litigant’s right to do so, not a judge working hard to derail such

effort.

B. Merit Of A Complaint

How does a judge determine merit of a case? By allowing opposing

parties to submit pleadings, and then review, conduct their own research and even

learn from such complaint and response. Just tossing out a complaint due to bias is

not what society wants to encourage here is like judging a book by its cover without

reading it at all and even such book read, if the reader doesn’t like it that doesn’t

mean another reader would dislike it just like the saying one man’s meat is another

man s poison and that’s where facts and evidence come in to play a role in the

justice system. With prejudice, the judge really wanted to silent the complaint

without one evidence to support the complaint is frivolous. Fourth Circuit just acted

as if the litigant is just a non-existence, order to affirm looks like someone at the

Fourth Circuit is at sleep because that’s not even a legal document, they filed it to

validate decision made. No opinions, nothing.

C. Subject Matter Jurisdiction

The first “illegal order” which was dismissed with prejudice without

allowing summons served, attorneys engaged, etc., is as bogus as COVID-19 scam.

Subject matter jurisdiction is authority of a court to hear a case, however the

authority of this district court to hear the case is proper because jury trial has been

established. Bigots, racists use their knowledge to disguise their racism and bigotry

as a virtue. Just like the Hansberry were denied the right to sue to own a home of

their own based on racist law that bars black people and people of color to be issued

deeds. If white people can say a black person is not entitled to own their own home,

any surprise a white judge citing bogus subject matter jurisdiction to dismiss a

complaint. District Court cannot hear a bankruptcy case only a Bankruptcy Court

could preside, however the same district court is allowed to hear appeal from

Bankruptcy Court. How interesting. The subject matter here does not apply to the

complaint only a racist and bigot pretending a black man that initiated a class

action has no right to do so when the issue before the district court is a global issue.

People will continue to have issue what role black people can play in our society. A

court in a civilized society pretending people cannot file lawsuit. Nothing new3.

Subject matter jurisdiction? Hilarious. Racists and bigots never ceased to amaze

[me]. They stood in the front entrances of schools, hospitals, diners, restaurants

screaming black people are not allowed to come in. Now can’t file lawsuit.

Goldsmith u. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, 845 F.2d 61 (4th Cir.

1988) is the case law cited by Henry Hudson to establish “subject matter

jurisdiction” which is flawed to the core because COVID-19 Class action is a

challenge to demonstrate COVID-19 is a scam which is now disrupting the global

community and continue to reinforce the bigotry of the bigots4. Irony here is parties

sued were served summons, the COVID-19 Class action never allowed service of

summons, let alone determination of the jurisdiction which is not an issue because

this is a class action. Goldsmith filed a lawsuit to declare a law passed to remove

her from office unconstitutional.

Lovern v. Edwards, 190 F.3d 648, 654 (4th Cir. 1999) is just another

nonsense cited by Henry Hudson. Petitioner is not going to devote time to research

all case laws cited in all orders issued by Henry Hudson because they’re garbage,

nothing more. This case law is totally ridiculous but again, all parties were served

summons. No case laws supported Henry Hudson to dismiss a complaint without

summons being served and parties engaging. Honestly, this ugliness is what people

3 This country allowed slave cells built to house blacks they just kidnapped for slavery. Let's have some fun here.

4 Biden administration just joined some European Countries to deny flight from Africa based on variants nonsense.

So, Chinese are not the carrier of COVID-19 anymore, now blacks of course from Africa got the variants. Now we

know why Henry Hudson dismissed COVID-19 Class action. Variants? Got to love the delusion of COVID-19

scammers

used to silent the opponents of slavery, holocaust, apartheid, etc. People do this all

the time to shut down people that opposed ugliness.

D. COVID-19 Class Action To Be Prosecuted

Due to the orders from Fourth Circuit and District Court are

illegal and egregious, petitioner filed amendment with the current case which was

filed to get the $250 million litigation funding submitted to a pension fund and the

refusal to file public documents with the Court led to file that complaint against the

Governor, Attorney General, et al5 and now amended to COVID-19 class action. The

interesting element here is Fourth Circuit must be avoiding to endorse the motions

filed to get COVID-19 transferred to judge Lauck who is assigned the second

complaint when an appeal was filed and misconduct complaint filed pursuant to

Judicial Conduct and Disability Act 1980 (“Act”), 28 §§ 351-364 against Henry

Hudson with the Fourth Circuit that oversees complaints filed against district court

judges after he dismissed the complaint for the second time via collusion, not via

statutes.

E. $40 Billion Secured Via COVID-19 Class Action Challenge

Concert

Petitioner, the entrepreneur dazzled the folks in Virginia when he

5 Ralph Northam, Mark Herring, et remind us when a white Governor with white students blocking

the entrance of a college and screaming at black students that have been given permission to attend

the institution. Ralph Northam, Mark Herring, et al blocking $250 million investment transaction

submitted to Virginia Retirement Investment Portfolio, and now they want to derail $40 billion

global fundraising under COVID-19 CLASS ACTION CHALLENGE CONCERT. Some things will

never change.

filed Notice on August 17, 2021 with the Court regarding the pending lawsuit (3:21CV-392) which is now COVID-19 CLASS ACTION via amendment on November 18,

2021 that 2 billion tickets will be sold via 5 World Market Tickets online

eCommerce to peoples across the globe at $20 per ticket and each ticket buyer will

automatically become a shareholder6 that mathematics is $40 billion7 in fundraising

thus putting the dependence on $250 million in the back burner and validating

funds are now available to fund prosecution of COVID-19 Class action including

paying United States to allow Judge Lauck to be transported in Air Force One

under “Motion For Air Force One”8 to Wuhan, China where Vice President Kamal

Harris and others will join the judge due to United States is one of the plaintiffs.

The visit to Wuhan Lab is to demonstrate virtually impossible any virus to leak

from that lab, let alone spread across the globe because no such intellect exists to

invent a virus in a lab that can be transmitted from human to human and any leak

would have been confined to the lab in Wuhan, not spread across the globe. Total

delusion (hilarious). For the record this was outlined inside the complaint invoking

6 Any party is allowed to purchase tickets online because this is a concert for global community to

rally against the COVID-19 scammers manipulating peoples across the globe. There’s no conflict if

one purchases a $20 ticket to watch livestreaming of the concert. Music is a powerful tool that has

been used to fight injustice, abuse, etc.

7 Petitioner is filing application in forma pauperis due to the website is not ready to allow peoples

across the globe to purchase concert tickets, however part of the $40 billion can pay for attorneys to

appear before the Court for Oral Argument if any because the defendants were never served any

summons and are not obligated to respond to this petition which petitioner is not going to serve.

Looks like Supreme Court has to adopt Article III of the Constitution to issue its own order to

reverse and allow COVID-19 CLASS action lawsuit proceed before Judge Lauck.

8 Motion For Air Force One was filed with memorandum to support to allow Judge Lauck, Kamala

Harris and others to be transported to Wuhan, China via Air Force One to visit the Wuhan Lab.

Others will be transported in chartered private planes. Wuhan Lah is now evidence in the COVID-19

Class Action challenge.

Nuclear Plants Disasters like Chernobyl Disaster which interestingly the incident

was confined to the area, not spread across the globe.

F. Millions Are Dying

The mantra is millions are dying because of bogus COVID-19 scam.

However billions (not millions) have been dying way before COVID-19 scam showed

up and tried to convince the whole planet COVID-19 is the cause of millions dying.

Millions are dying, but not from COVID-19 because people supposed to die.

According to WHO’s own research of India Deaths in 2017, 9.7 million deaths9 in

India which is 28,000 deaths per day. No one knows that because it was never

reported. The COVID-19 scammers are now reporting deaths to support their scam.

This writ is not about the COVID-19, but it must be outlined succinctly to guide the

Court the preview of the COVID-19 Class action trial.

This idiot, Fauci is lying. Fauci is a bogus intellectual that cannot be

taken seriously. His leadership during AIDS crisis is nadir beyond comprehension.

The COVID-19 scammers are lying. New York declaring emergency is total

domination. They’re now calling it Omicron variants, total paranoia. This must

stop. Decent people didn’t give up the fight during slavery. Enough of this nonsense.

Penalized mortality has no place in a civilized society. People supposed to get sick

and die, there’s nothing this Court or the racists can do about mortality. If we have

to go to another country to file this class action, so be it because in the United

States, people are just too ridiculous and racist beyond decency just like they fought

9 India Deaths of 2017 as in 9.7 million deaths which is 28,000 deaths per day was filed as "Exhibit" under COVID19 CLASS ACTION with both Courts. India Deaths invalidated COVID-19.

so hard to keep slavery alive. Baltimore Sun white journalists waged war against

blacks and colored people and promoted segregation and denial of education to

blacks. Late Thurgood Marshall was forced to go to another school for education due

to segregation.

Petitioner is going to outline one important evidence that will shock

this Court. Let’s take the day this writ was filed which will be December 29, 2021

when it was mailed. Now all peoples around the globe let say 7 billion all together

as of December 29, 2021 will not be around 200 years later. That’s remarkable that

all 7 billion peoples around December 29, 2021 will not be around 200 years after

the date meaning all gone. Their COVID-19 scam vaccine can’t save 7 billion

peoples from dying. So, the argument millions are dying is not enough to support

COVID-19 scam which sustains COVID-19 CLASS ACTION lawsuit must proceed.

G. Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh Hearings

Both Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh are now Associate

Justices of this Court, however their hearings were ugly beyond ugly laced with

allegations of sexual harassment and rapes, respectively. But both were given the

opportunity to deny and due process for the Senate to vote to confirm. Now, it is the

same due process denied COVID-19 Class Action to be prosecuted for both sides to

show just like the parties that alleged misconduct against Thomas and Kavanaugh

were allowed to testify regardless if such allegations denied. Actually this citation

looks like about due process which it is, however the true reason for this citation

will surprise this Court, the citation demonstrates how easy an individual can

conjure up anything and manipulate people just like COVID-19 has been conjured

up and now people are getting manipulated. Doesn’t take much to do that.

H. I am Vaccinated You Dumb F*ck

“I am vaccinated you dumb f*ck” is a popular phrase uttered by a

transient/homeless10 man in Los Angeles, California when a passerby lamented if

COVID-19 is so fatal like they claimed, how come all the homeless are still alive?

The transient answered: ‘I am vaccinated you dumb f*ck’ which the media labeled

such response as vintage, ingenuity, classic. So, every creature alive is vaccinated,

you dumb f*ck. This “illusion of immortality” is just that because when society

starts using vaccine is what keeps everyone alive, who is the real dumb f*ck? This is

the real reason COVID-19 Class Action must be prosecuted because at the end of

the day, telling one they’re alive because of a vaccine is not welcome here. The

message now is “Penalized Mortality.” Take your vaccine if you want to live forever

because those of you that embrace mortality will be severely punished. Really.

REASONS FOR GRANTING PETITION

The Court’s review is warranted because the decision below was never about

the rule of law, but based on racism and bigotry that a black man worked very hard

to submit evidence COVID-19 is a scam. The Fourth Circuit did not oppose the

complaint nor even outlined any immunity of United Nations against lawsuits

which this petitioner has outlined already mitigated by Article VIII, Section 29 of

10 It would be more reasonable if the same homeless guy can say the same for “shelter mandate” just

like vaccine mandate.” Of course, the COVID-19 scammers want the homeless dumb f*ck to think

they re looking out for him while he’s on the street and the COVID-19 scammers raking in all the

billions. Human nature is ugly beyond ugly.

the Convention. Even the district court never denounced the complaint, just

mumbo-jumbo outlined to dismiss with prejudice validating the race of the party

behind the complaint is a factor.

THIS COURT SHOULD ONCE AND FOR ALL RESOLVE THE ISSUE

IF A COMPLAINT (VALIDITY NOT AN ISSUE) CAN BE DISMISSED

BY A SITTING JUDGE WITHOUT OPPOSING PARTIES BEING

SERVED SUMMONS TO RESPOND

As this case demonstrates, Fourth Circuit’s role is to follow the rule of law

and the statutes that support any decision to reverse or affirm lower court decision.

In this case, no known statutes, case laws or even Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

sustain a district court to dismiss a complaint without summons served the

defendants and defendants getting their day to refute and defend themselves.

Litigants should be allowed to file lawsuits under Petition Clause which petitioner

outlined in the Informal Brief11 filed with the Fourth Circuit to appeal district

court s decision to toss out a complaint without due process in this case summons

not allowed to be served.

II.

PETITION CLAUSE

This case arises under the Petition Clause of the First Amendment to

the United States Constitution. Right to sue. Hansberry v. Lee, 311 U.S. 32 (1940)

which the Hansberry won their right to sue. In McDonald v. Smith, 472 U.S. 479

(1985), the same Supreme Court held that right to petition does not provide

11 This Court will be amazed the Informal Brief is a classic no doubt if the public views the Informal

Brief, they will see racism and bigotry from the Fourth Circuit to affirm.

absolute immunity to petitioners which supports right to petition the Government

(or any party) for a redress of grievances, excluding immunity that gives a

respondent to file lawsuit. Petition Clause trumps “subject matter jurisdiction.”

III.

AMENDED COMPLAINT

A second complaint Ogunjobi v. Northam et al No. 3:21-CV-392 MHL

which was filed on June 14, 2021 five days after COVID-19 Class action was

dismissed for the second time against the Governor of Commonwealth of Virginia,

Attorney General of Commonwealth of Virginia, et al is a complaint filed to obtain

Summary Judgment to get $250 million loan disbursed under the litigation funding

investment submitted with Virginia Retire System Investment Portfolio that

promises to pay off the loan12 and grants $250 billion in equity stake at no cost to

the pension fund which 66% is owned by taxpayers. When petitioner promised a

lawsuit if the fund is not disbursed by June 11, 2021 due to email sent them June 7,

2021, the parties went behind closed door to collude with Henry Hudson to dismiss

the case with prejudice because Henry Hudson already dismissed the complaint of

12 To pay off the $250 million loan, it was outlined bonds will be issued. Now, the $40 billion global

concert will actually be enough to pay off the loan. What Fourth Circuit did when order issued on

September 15, 2021 to affirm district court’s order is actually to deny the global concert meaning if

no lawsuit how is this black man going to convince peoples across the globe to pay $20 per ticket

because Notice to engage in COVID-19 CLASS ACTION GLOBAL CONCERT to sell tickets $20 per

ticket was filed with the Court on August 17, 2021. But Fourth Circuit forgot that the pending

second complaint before Judge Lauck could be amended to COVID-19 CLASS ACTION lawsuit

which petitioner called “Devine Intervention” at its best when the idea showed up in his head to just

amend the pending complaint before Judge Lauck to COVID-19 Class action which was done on

November 18, 2021 via mail. For the record the message to amend complaint into COVID-19 CLASS

ACTION did not occur on November 18, 2021. Petitioner will save that for a book. Actually, the

defendants of case number 3:21-CV-392 MHL via their counsel used the dismissal of the complaint

as defense that if there’s no case, no need for the Court to grant Summary Judgment to disburse

fund, however Petitioner’s reply outlined to the Court that $250 million is “partial funding” because

bonds will be issued to investors.

COVID-19 Class Action challenge before without summons being served, so Henry

Hudson dismissed it with prejudice on June 9, 2021, which response from petitioner

is to sue. Misconduct under Judicial Misconduct was filed against Henry Hudson

that he colluded with parties that are not even party to COVID-19 Class action to

dismiss and never even filed any documents with the Court for the public to review

validating the cowardice of these racists is overwhelming. Now, they will get their

chance to defend COVID-19 in Court due to their names are now “joinders” of

amended complaint into COVID-19 Class Action. Amazing why people are actually

afraid to find out of COVID-19 is real. Proponents of COVID-19 should be happy

this lawsuit is pending for prosecution, but the way everything is unfolding, people

are scared to death to learn COVID-19 is bogus. A total nightmare. When Fourth

Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision which Informal Brief outlined such

misconduct and even requested the Fourth Circuit to reverse and transfer the case

to Judge Lauck who has another complaint13 about the fund and COVID-9 Class

action in spite of motions to transfer and motion to disqualify Henry Hudson filed

and denied by Henry Hudson (no surprise), petitioner then filed amendment to the

complaint with motions to amend, memorandum to support which the result is

13 Actually, when email was sent to Ralph Northam, Mark Herring, et al, petitioner outlined his

lawsuit to get the $250 million fund disbursed will be assigned to Henry Hudson because the

complaint is similar to COVID-19 CLASS action pending before Henry Hudson. However the lawsuit

was dismissed two days after the email was sent, so when lawsuit was filed to get disbursement,

petitioner attached a letter instructing the clerk to assign the lawsuit to another judge because ’

misconduct complaint will be filed against Henry Hudson. That’s how Ogunjobi v. Northam, et al

landed in front of Judge Lauck. Now it is now amended to Toks Banc Corp et al v. United Nations et

al miraculously COVID-19 CLASS ACTION finally landed in front of Judge Lauck in spite of Henry

Hudson and Fourth Circuit’s effort to derail the COVID-19 CLASS action lawsuit that’s why

petitioner called it Divine Intervention at its best. The legal mumbo jumbo from Hudson and Fourth

is just mumbo jumbo. Racist do this all the time disguised bigotry as a virtue.

Ogunjobi v. Northam et al now Toks Banc Corp et al v. United Nations et al and

summons will be served to United Nations, World Health Organization and CDC as

joinders since summons already served on the complaint, the very summons Henry

Hudson worked so hard to deny service to United Nations14 et al. Petitioner became

the first entrepreneur to sue the Board of Trustees and Chief Investment Officer of

a pension fund backed by statutes of Commonwealth of Virginia. The complaint

outlined pension fund’s beneficiaries are the taxpayers that own 66% of the pension

fund, not the Board of Trustees, Chief Investment Officer acting de facto “owners” of

the pension fund.

This petition is not about allowing COVID-19 Class action lawsuit to

proceed because Petition Clause allows it to be prosecuted, petition is about if a

judge has the authority to dismiss a complaint on his own without any regards to

the parties involved. COVID-19 Class Action will be fully prosecuted to abolish

COVID-19. No such virus let alone a disease exists where people are now being

trained and manipulated to engage in paranoia behavior as if someone is preaching

they can now prevent people from dying or getting sick because of a bogus vaccine

just like con artists used to roam across United States back then selling miracle

medicine that can make people rich. Total delusion. You get sick, it is normal and

human. If one doesn’t get sick, they’re not human. You die, it is normal.

14 United Nations is big on human rights, equality and fairness, it is not too much for United Nations

to show up in Court with their co-defendants to demonstrate COVID-19 is not a scam, not rely on a

crooked judge doing their dirty job. Show up and defend according to the rule of the law and send a

clear message to any judge “we can take care of ourselves.”

The amended complaint before Judge Lauck filed on November 18

2021 under case number 3:21-CV-392 MHL as COVID-19 CLASS ACTION

CHALLENGE which plaintiff with excitement labeled it “Divine Intervention” as its

best because amending the complaint to COVID-19 CLASS ACTION CHALLENGE

miraculously i) overturned the dismissal of the original complaint with prejudice

issued twice without summons served due to motions filed to get the compliant

transferred from Hudson to Lauck ; ii) transfer the case to Judge Lauck as planned

when motion to transfer filed; iii) disqualification of Henry Hudson satisfied; iv)

order from appeals court to affirm overturned; v) summons to be served the

joinders-finally; vi) district court’s jurisdiction not divested; vii) Writ of Certiorari

filed with the Supreme Court of the United States to determine what statutes exist

that grant a sitting and presiding judge the autonomy to dismiss a complaint on his

own without parties engaged.

Labelling Ralph Northam and Mark Herring, et al racists and bigots is

because the $250 million investment litigation funding 30-page loan document

submitted to Chief Investment Officer of the Virginia Retirement System

Investment Portfolio is a “LOAN” not equity meaning it must be paid back with

interest, however equity was granted as well because the pension fund’s

beneficiaries are taxpayers. So, what’s the problem? As usual, racism and bigotry.

IV.

THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION GRANTS AUTHORITY

TO THIS COURT TO REVERSE

United States u. Shipp, 203 U.S. 563 (1906) is the only time the entire

history of the Supreme Court of the United States to preside over criminal trial and

still holds today when the Court found Sheriff Joseph F. Shipp and five men guilty

of contempt when they engaged in lynching of Ed Johnson, a black man accused of

rape of a white woman. Supreme Court issued a stay to the execution to review the

evidence Ed Johnson did not commit any rape. The attorney for the defendants

before the Court argued that the Supreme Court Justices were now party to the

proceedings, not as judges. Justice Holmes shut down such scenario that the

justices have no conflict-of-interest, only judges assigned to perform a duty thus

supporting petitioner s argument before this Court judicial immunity protects

litigants (as in Ed Johnson), not judges. Justice Holmes even went further that

Shipp s action never affected the justices (meaning the justices were never lynched)

and there was no threat to them only finding them contempt for violating the right

of the Court to review the appeal and any execution of Johnson must be put on hold.

The purpose of this citation is to request Supreme Court to reverse and allow Judge

Lauck to preside over COVID-19 Class action just like Supreme Court in 1906

allowed criminal proceeding of the defendants of contempt of the court which

unfortunately couldnt bring back Ed Johnson15 to proclaim his innocence as he did

from the beginning when he was accused of rape.

Article III of the Constitution permits this Court to amend, affirm or

15 Ed Johnson case is classic racism and bigotry people have used against blacks and still do today.

Ed Johnson was arrested for mere observation by an individual that informed the police Ed Johnson

owns a belt because a white woman was raped in the previous night and a belt was used to restrain

her and knocked unconscious validating she never saw her attacker, but Ed Johnson owning a belt

like most men do was arrested for the rape. Ed Johnson was innocent because mere owning a belt is

not an evidence one committed a crime, what about other white men that own belts? Interesting how

angry people get when blacks pointed out racism just like petitioner is telling this Court Fourth

Circuit and Henry Hudson are racist to the core.

overturn decisions made by lower courts and tribunals. It is imperative to

understand that summons were never served because a sitting judge at the lower

court undermined that process on purpose not to protect the public and this writ

cannot be served either where the Court can grant review for briefs filer! by

opposing parties and oral hearing scheduled which sustains anytime a judge

enSa&es in misconduct and supported by appeals court (Fourth Circuit) it becomes a

quagmire to say the least and undermine the whole judicial process.

This Court like all other courts must be open and be amenable to

events as they arise. When the opportunity to uphold the integrity of the legal

system, a law enforcement and five other men were tried criminally in the Supreme

Court, the Court did not decline that such (criminal) proceeding couldn’t be held.

Bush v. Gore 531 U.S. 98 (2000) is just another extraordinary event

where the Supreme Court ended it all to save the legal system (regardless who

benefits from such ruling), not the election as people viewed because of the phrase

Supreme Court elected Bush....” The trials, motions, hearings at lower courts and

finally reached Supreme Court is at the core, never the election. The whole

proceedings were running amok and recklessness becoming the norm.

THE ISSUE IS NOT COVID-19 IS REAL ISSUE IS IF COVID-19

TURNS OUT TO BE A SCAM AND TOTAL GLOBAL FRAUD

Even though the issue before this Court is explicitly clear, but one

issue to ponder is the problem is not COVID-19 is real, that’s nothing. The real

problem is COVID-19 turns out to be a total scam, fraud, big time. Honestly, it is

time for this Court to put this to rest to allow COVID-19 Class action to proceed

because the evidence COVID-19 is a scam is growing and no doubt, people will talk

that the only reason Henry Hudson and Fourth Circuit is engaging in bigotry and

racism is because a black man initiated a class action. COVID-19 class action or any

class action is not about one party, however someone got to initiate any form of

lawsuit. Henry and Fourth just don’t like the man is black.

CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, the Petition for Certiorari should be granted with

special request to reverse order of complaint dismissed with prejudice without

summons served defendants and subsequently affirmed by Fourth Circuit and allow

transferred to Judge Lauck whose Court has an amended complaint as in COVID19 Class Action supported under Petition Clause—right to sue.

Respectfully submitted,

ADESIJUOLA OGUNJOBI

/s/Adesijuola Ogunjobi

November 29, 2021

P.O. Box 56454

Jacksonville, FL 32256

Cell: (904) 894-1466

adesijuolaogunjobi@gmail.com

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.