Petition for Rehearing — Christopher David Cobb, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court briefDec 30, 2021

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

IN. .THE, SUPREME COURT -OF'VTHE, UNITED STATES.

fy'.

isi.

I.'-; !-i

W:-- .:r..

CHRISTOPHER DAVID COBB

■■

■

■

)

)

V

No 21-6116

)

FILED

DEC 3 0 2021

)

UNITED STATES

)

CD'/

PETITION FOR REHEARING FOR JUSTICE GORSUCH

Comes

Now,

Christopher

D.

Cobb,

proceeding

Pro

Se,

to request Justice Gorsuch to

support his Request for Rehearing. Support for which follows:

1. The decisions of the lower courts, as well as this Court's denial of certiorari, runs

afoul of Smith v United States, 96 S.Ct. 2, 46 L.Ed 2d 9, 423 U.S. 1303, 1307-08 (1975):

"[A]ll

constitutional

notorious reputations,

guarantees

extend

both to

rich and

poor

alike,

to

those with

as well as to those who are models of upright Citizenship. No

regime under the rule of law could comport with constitutional standard that drew such

distinctions"

The constitution specifically guarantees that all officers of the State shall swear

an Oath of Office. Despite evidence.that Gallagher did not do so, the Eleventh Circuit

declared that she had, with nothing before it to support such a conclusion. The district

court

determined that

she

had

not,

but

that this

lack

was

"harmless".

This

places

Gallagher into a position of supremacy over Cobb. Gallagher has been afforded protections

which are not enumerated in any document of our Republic, save these two lower decisions,

whereas Cobb, having presented the illegallity of the proceedings, has been afforded none

of

the

guaranteed

protections

of

the

Constitution,

Statute,

Federal Rules,

or prior

precedent of this Court; all presentations of which he has made to be in his favor. He

has been procedurally barred based upon a case that was essentially overturned two years

later,

yet

not

declared

to

be

overturned;

which

created

a

loophole

for

unlawful

prosecutions that has in turns been upheld and denied. None of this comports with our

Founding Father's intentions of Rule of Law or for guaranteeing that ilREGE^/EQ 1 and prevail blindly without regard for class or social status.

Accordingly,

of injustice.

Cobb asks for your intervention as an Originalist, to

JAN 2 5 2022

tferSJwJfge&ah

SUPRCOURT, U.S.

Respectfully Submitted,

December 30, 2021

Date

Christopher D. Cobb

Certificate of Service

I

I,

Christopher D.

Cobb,

hereby swear under penalty of perjury that the foregoing was

placed in the hands of the FSL Jesup Legal Mail Representative on

Dec. 30, 2021

and

ask the Clerk of Court to notify those listed on the Court's CM/ECF system as having a

connection to this case of same.

Respectfully Submitted,

December 30, 2021

Christopher D. Cobb

Date

r

!

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.