Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ahmad Jamaleddin Aljindi, Petitioner v. United States, et al.

Supreme Court briefFeb 8, 2020

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

No. 20-

-7708

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

SuPre

Dr. AHMAD J. ALJINDI,

Petitioner,

F£B ' 8 2020

2pFjCE

vs.

2£the

•Stgft/c

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al.,

Respondents.

On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to

the United States Court of Appeals

for the Ninth Circuit

PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Dr. AHMAD J. ALJINDI

PO Box 60753

Irvine, CA 92602

Cell: 951-742-9773

Email: Dr.Ahmad.Aljindi@outlook.com

Pro Se Litigant

'tP

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

Why the Federal Agencies and the Intelligence Community (IC) (“Respondents”)

are allowed to abuse and torture the aggrieved (“Petitioner”) to death by crushing his

human, civil, Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) rights, and to illegally prevent him

to work and to serve the best interest of the United States, the American People, and

justice for years as he is an Artificial Intelligence (AI) Scientist aiming to resolve the

$23+ Trillion national debt as scientifically and formally documented and evidenced?

Why the Federal Government (FG) and the IC are allowed to prevent the aggrieved

Petitioner from having one and only one EEO and to abuse 42 formal EEO complaint in a

blatant challenge to the United States Constitution that prohibit unlawful discrimination

based on protected classes (religion, race, and national origin), retaliation based on

protected statuses, whistleblower reprisal, corruption, and hate crimes based on federally

protected activities? Why the few involved judicial officers are abusing the aggrieved

Petitioner’s truthful and legitimate lawsuit cases and allowed to coordinate with the

Respondents illegally and to practice unlawful discrimination and retaliation against the

aggrieved Petitioner and to keep abusing his truthful and legitimate lawsuit cases

maliciously and in bad faith and to obstruct justice while he is only requesting his

Constitutional Relief in a serious judicial COUP against the United States Constitution?

Why the involved federal officials can remain in their public positions instead of facing

justice at Courts and get paid from the taxpayers’ funds illegally while their false

statements under penalty of perjury are documented in the EEO dockets? Why the

aggrieved Petitioner is being abused and tortured to death without having any legal rights

because he is a proud Muslim-American patriot aiming to get Nobel Prize in Economic

Sciences for the United States and the American People based on the scientifically

proven AI strategy? Why the FG is not interested in resolving the national debt and is

working for the best interest of the billionaires in top (the thieves) and the special

interests and agendas and not the American People as formally documented, proven, and

evidenced in the related cases section below and EEO dockets? Why the wrongdoers are

allowed to steal the aggrieved Petitioner’s intellectual property and Constitutional

monetary compensations and to work to fabricate retaliatory and malicious claims against

him aiming to mislead justice instead of defending justice? Why the aggrieved MuslimAmerican minority is being marginalized intentionally and systematically illegally in the

United States? Why the FG is directing the dictatorships around the world to stop abusing

the minorities and the brave citizens demanding justice, and Constitutional rights legally

like the Petitioner, but the wrongdoers are abusing and torturing the aggrieved Petitioner?

Why the few involved judicial officers are refusing to perform the Constitutional

responsibilities and obligations and are allowed to dismiss and close the truthful and

legitimate lawsuit cases to cover the corruption under the most popular false and

malicious excuse “frivolous” and to escalate the unlawful discrimination and retaliation

against him instead of preventing it? Finally, what is the Supreme Court’s decision after

the aggrieved Petitioner’s formal presentation of the formally proven and documented

scandals in this truthful, brave, and ethical Petition and in the Related Cases referenced

below? Are the Supreme Court’s Honorable Justices going to GRANT this absolutely

truthful, legitimate, and Constitutional Petition aiming to defend justice, the best interest

of the United States, the American People, and uphold the United States Constitution?

LIST OF PARTIES

[ ] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page.

[ X ] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all

parties to the proceeding in the court whose judgment is the subject of this petition is as

follows:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

SECRETARY BARBARA M. BARRETT, DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE,

SECRETARY MARK T. ESPER, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEFENSE

ACQUISITION UNIVERSITY,

SECRETARY MARK T. ESPER, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEFENSE

CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY,

SECRETARY MARK T. ESPER, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEFENSE

INTELLIGENCE AGENCY,

SECRETARY MARK T. ESPER, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, NATIONAL

SECURITY AGENCY,

SECRETARY MARK T. ESPER, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, OFFICE OF

INSPECTOR GENERAL,

ACTING SECRETARY CHAD F. WOLF, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND

SECURITY, IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT,

ACTING SECRETARY CHAD F. WOLF, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND

SECURITY, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION,

ACTING SECRETARY CHAD F. WOLF, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND

SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES,

WILLIAM P. BARR, ATTORNEY GENERAL; CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY,

DIRECTOR OF THE FBI (SUED IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY), DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION,

ACTING SECRETARY THOMAS B. MODLY, DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS ROBERT WILKIE, DEPARTMENT OF

VETERANS AFFAIRS,

ACTING DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE JOSEPH MAGUIRE,

OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE,

ADMINISTRATOR JIM BRIDENSTINE, NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND

SPACE ADMINISTRATION,

ACTING ADMINISTRATOR AND GENERAL COUNSEL CHRIS PILKERTON,

UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION,

MEGAN J. BRENNAN, POSTMASTER GENERAL, UNITED STATES POSTAL

SERVICE,

RELATED CASES

Dr. Ahmad J. Aljindi v. United States ofAmerica et al, No. U8:18-cv-02301-SJO-JC,

United States District Court - Central District of California - Southern Division. Order

entered 01/08/2019.

Ahmad Aljindi v. United States ofAmerica et al, No. 8:19-cv-01434-DOC-E, United

States District Court - Central District of California - Southern Division. Order entered

08/05/2019.

Ahmad Aljindi v. USA, et al, No. 19-55926, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth

Circuit. Order entered 12/31/2019. Mandate issued 01/08/2020.

Dr. Ahmad J. Aljindi v. United States ofAmerica et al, No. 8:20-cv-00002-DOC-E,

United States District Court - Central District of California - Southern Division. Order

entered 01/24/2020.

Ahmad Aljindi v. USA, et al, No. 20-55111, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth

Circuit.

Dr. Ahmad J. Aljindi Motion for Publication of Records, United States Foreign

Intelligence Surveillance Court.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

OPINIONS BELOW

JURISDICTION

CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED

STATEMENT OF THE CASE..............................................................

REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION....................................

CONCLUSION

.40

INDEX TO APPENDICES

APPENDIX A

Order of United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

APPENDIX B

Order of United States District Court - Central District of California Southern Division

APPENDIX C

Order of United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Denying

Reconsideration and Rehearing En Banc and Mandate

APPENDIX D

Order of United States District Court - Central District of California Southern Division

APPENDIX E

Order of United States District Court - Central District of California Southern Division

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

Cases

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

Statutes

28 U.S.C. § 1257

Constitutional Provisions

United States Constitution, Amendment I

United States Constitution, Amendment V

United States Constitution, Amendment VI

United States Constitution, Amendment VII

United States Constitution, Amendment XIV

IN THE

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the order below.

OPINIONS BELOW

[ 2L ] For cases from federal courts:

The opinion of the United States court of appeals appears at Appendix A to the

petition and is

[ ] reported at; or,

[ ] has been designated for publication but is not yet reported; or,

[ X ] is unpublished.

The opinion of the United States district court appears at Appendix B to the

petition and is

[ ] reported at; or,

[ ] has been designated for publication but is not yet reported; or, ,

[ 2U is unpublished.

JURISDICTION

[ X ] For cases from federal courts:

The date on which the United States Court of Appeals decided my case

was 12/31/2019.

[ ] No petition for rehearing was timely filed in my case.

[ X ] A timely petition for rehearing was denied by the United States Court of

Appeals on the following date 12/31/2019:, and a copy of the order denying

rehearing appears at Appendix A.

[ ] An extension of time to file the petition for a writ of certiorari was granted to

and including (date) on (date) in Application No. A .

The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under 28 U. S. C. § 1254(1).

CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED

United States Constitution, Amendment I:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the

free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of

the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of

grievances.

United States Constitution, Amendment V:

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a

presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval

forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall

any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor

shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived

of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be

taken for public use, without just compensation.

United States Constitution, Amendment VI:

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial,

by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed,

which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the

nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to

have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance

of counsel for his defense.

United States Constitution, Amendment VII:

In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the

right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise

reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common

law.

United States Constitution, Amendment XIV:

All persons bom or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction

thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State

shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens

of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property,

without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal

protection of the laws.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

I, the Petitioner, Dr. AHMAD J. ALJINDI “Pro Se” respectfully submitting this

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Honorable Supreme Court in good faith and to the

best of my knowledge and ability aiming to defend justice, the best interest of the United

States and the American People, and to uphold the United States Constitution.

EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION

The Petitioner is suffering from the Respondents unlawful discrimination based

on his protected classes religion, race, and national origin since years as he is suffering

from the Respondents retaliation because of his Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)

protected activities and other legally protected activities including filing lawsuit cases

demanding justice and formal complaints for whistleblower reprisal. The Petitioner’s

religion is Muslim. The Petitioner’s race is Arab/Middle Eastern. The Petitioner’s

national origin is Syria. The Petitioner made several formal reports to report the public

corruption to several responsible authorities and agencies including the Federal Bureau of

Investigation (FBI). Additionally, the Petitioner is suffering because he is an Artificial

Intelligence (AI) Scientist presented a formally proven scientific strategy to the majority

of the involved federal agencies based on his formal higher education Ph.D. and based on

a scientifically proven research study recommending utilizing AI to resolve many of the

major issues the United States is suffering from such as the $23+ Trillion federal debt

within 15 to 20 years if not less depending on many factors as formally explained and to

bring the national security risks to zero percent if the discovered AI practical solutions

implemented strategically. As a result, the Petitioner was subject to suffer from the

Respondents violations as the Intelligence Community (IC) escalated the violations

against him to be intentional and systematic violation and hate crimes in a blatant

Challenge to the United States Constitution that prohibit the unlawful discrimination,

retaliation, whistleblower reprisal, and corruption. The Petitioner suggested several

practical solutions including establishing what can be called the “AI FBI” and the “AI

Special Agent (SA)” that will operate as the soul of the United States Constitution as it

will prevent the corruption and assist the FBI officials and SAs with their mission and to

defend justice and uphold the United States Constitution qualitatively and firmly.

The Respondents including the FBI decided to ignore such significant scientific

and sensitive discoveries that will prevent the violations and the corruption such as

briberies firmly and permanently. The Respondents including the FBI decided to escalate

the ongoing violations against the Petitioner to occur intentionally and systematically and

refused to investigate and end the formally reported hate crimes illegally. The

Respondents including the FBI decided to ignore the scientific facts presented and to

target the Petitioner as a person as an unethical and a malicious illegal tactic aiming to

mislead, abuse, obstruct justice, and to retaliate against him.

The Petitioner respects the Federal Government (FG) and the FBI; however, the

Petitioner realized the FBI’s wrong decision about ignoring preventing the massive

human, civil, and EEO rights violations of the few involved corrupt officials that

escalated to reach the hate crimes levels as this is a unique situation. The Petitioner

refuses the corruption, racisim, wrongdoing, and injustice. The Petitioner believes that

the FG is obligated to prevent the corruption, racisim, reprisal, and injustice and to

defend the best interest of the United States, the American People, justice, and to uphold

the United States Constitution.

I made thousands ofjobs applications since years and within the last decade.

However, there is no place for me because of my protected classes and protected statuses.

No EEOs. No diversity. No respect for the United States Constitution that prohibit the

unlawful discrimination, retaliation, and corruption. The selection process is not based on

merit. I submitted thousands ofjobs applications based on my formal qualifications and

skills within the last decade with the FG. The final result is always the same. No Job!

They keep issuing me the formal documents confirming my eligibility and qualification

and refer my name to hiring officials for selection or non-selection. I passed all related

exams and interviews. However, the hiring officials keep selecting less qualified

candidates illegally. The formal EEO complaints dockets presented to the Courts already

documented massive violations and wrongdoing.

The FG is trying to say that an applicant with four degrees including a Ph.D.,

seven essential majors as explained in the Personal Statement, more than 10+ years of AI

researching experience, in addition to other qualifications and skills is not the best

candidate for any of the thousands of jobs applications he submitted during the last

decade. The AI scientist who was able to develop a scientific strategy based on a generic

qualitive study to resolve the national debt as formally documented in addition to the

most sensitive scientific discovery in the entire AI field is not a good candidate for any

job within the FG including Agencies like the Veterans Affairs, Social Security

Administration, and Forest Services, this is according to the FG’s formal adverse actions

and legal arguments as documented and evidenced! I am eligible for GS-13 positions, but

they did not even select me for GS-5/6 or even GS-1! I have evidenced many nepotism

crimes as well as some hiring officials hired their friends and relatives illegally. In fact, I

have evidenced a crime by and Immigration and Immigration and Customs Enforcement

(ICE) officer who hired his female friend because she is a beautiful lady! The aggrieved

Petitioner documented that in the formal EEO docket. However, the agency directed the

EEO investigator to delete the entire docket and to delete all testimonies and to start over

from scratch and removed that corrupted official from the entire investigation! The

aggrieved Petitioner reported that formally to the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the

Department of Homeland Security (DHS) responsible offices. However, they covered the

crimes in a blatant challenge to the United States Constitution. I have also evidenced a

major fraud and forgery hate crime in the formal examinations documents with the

United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and other agencies as well.

Similar illegal crimes occurred as well as the agency has removed the involved officials

from the investigation and as the EEO investigator removed the evidences from the

Reports of Investigations (ROIs) illegally as well. I have documented and evidenced

several crimes committed by the EEO investigators who isolated formal documents and

entire Rebuttal testimonies from the formal ROIs in addition to many unbelievable and

unethical crimes. Everything has been formally documented, evidenced, and proven

already! They are covering the crimes and normalizing it!

Some agencies like the Air Force refused to allow the aggrieved Petitioner to file

EEO complaints in a serious Constitutional crime to cover the wrongdoing of the two

stars Major General and his Director of Staff who fabricated a false document illegally!

Some other agencies like the Navy closed the formal EEO complaints to cover the crimes

of the involved hiring officials. Scandals! Disgrace! They are destroying the United

States! Massive amount of unethical crimes has been formally documented, proven, and

evidenced in these 42 formal EEO complaints and the above referenced related cases.

Respondents without any exception committed formally proven, documented, and

evidenced violations and crimes against the aggrieved Petitioner under the formal

awareness of the DOJ, DAG, and FBI. However, the hate crimes against the were

escalated massively as he is currently being abused and tortured to death and the

criminals and wrongdoers are still occupying the public positions illegally. In fact, they

are currently working on escalating the injustice against him further because of his

federally protected, Constitutional, and legal activities as formally documented and

evidenced. The aggrieved Petitioner is being abused because he formally documented and

evidenced serious crimes committed by several public officials including officials with

sensitive positions.

The FG is trying to say that no official was aware that “AHMAD” is a Muslim

name and that applicants with Associate and Bachelor Degrees are better than a Ph.D.

holder and AI Scientist with four Degrees and seven essential majors! The FG is trying to

say that this not unlawful discrimination, retaliation, and corruption! The FG issued many

Final Agencies Decision letters (FADs) confirming my legal rights that I do have the

right to go to the District Court. When I went to the District Court, they closed my three

lawsuit cases illegally and immediately! The Ninth Circuit closed the first Appeal 1955926 illegally and is currently abusing the second Appeals 20-55111.

One hundred percent of the involved hiring officials presented false statements

under penalty of perjury as formally documented, proven, and evidenced in the formal

EEO complaints dockets and falsely claimed that they did not know my protected classes

while it was formally documented in my resume and applications for employments. All

of them without exceptions lied under oath aiming to mislead justice. Hiring officials at

the IC are trying to say that they did not know my protected classes. They all confirmed

that they have reviewed my resume and applications carefully while it was documented

in the resume clearly. Hiring officials with Bachelor or even Master Degrees evaluated

me while they do not even qualify to be students in my class! They hired way less

qualified candidates illegally and in a blatant challenge to the United States Constitution.

Scandals! Disgrace!

I am formally declaring that I challenge those corrupt officials and their illegal

selectees to appear in a fair and unbiased jury trial for legal and scientific challenge if

they are brave enough and if they dare. In fact, I also challenge the AI Scientists within

the entire body of the FG for a legal and a scientific challenge as the ODNI selected a less

qualified candidate illegally for the Chief Scientist position. I will crush and destroy their

corruption, racisim, and ignorance veiy hard. Very hard! Harder than anything anyone

have heard about before. Make no mistake about that! They know the outcome! This is

why they are obstructing justice and preventing the fair and unbiased jury trial. However,

they are not cowards, criminals, traitors, and ignorant only but they are also rude! They

are also stealing my Constitutional Relief illegally! How rude! Radically extreme hate!

Pure hate crimes! This is why they are crushing my human, civil, and EEO rights and

abusing and torturing me to death under the formal awareness of the FG and Courts!

The aggrieved Petitioner won all formal EEO complaints listed in the above

referenced related cases including the formal EEO complaints which some agencies

obstructed, abused, and closed illegally and/or failed to investigate. However, the

Respondents kept issuing false and illegal FADs no matter ofjustice and no matter of law

and no matter of the formally proven, documented, and evidenced crimes and violations.

The FADs stated clearly that I can go to the District Court. When I went to the District

Court, they coordinated with the few involved judicial officers to close my lawsuit cases

immediately and illegally, so the American People do not become aware about the

massive amount of crimes and scandals at the formally requested Jury Trial. Scandals.

Straight obstruction of justice crimes and COUP against the United States Constitution

and treason to the oath of office.

The Petitioner is a proud Muslim-American patriot was working formally and

scientifically to serve his country and to resolve the major economic issues the United

States is suffering from for decades. However, the corruption and fascism are obstructing

such noble ultimate goals. Therefore, the Petitioner is not only suffering from the

Respondents unlawful discrimination and retaliation, but he is also suffering from the

Respondents intentional and systematic violations and hate crimes as they are refusing to

allow him to secure himself a stable job, or even to get his Constitutional Relief and seek

his self-employment opportunity as formally proven and evidenced in the lower Courts

dockets, so he can survive, recover, and live with dignity and even if it is not related to or

involved with AI and the scientific research. In other words, the Respondents indirect

message is no jobs based on false arguments such as experience and false and fabricated

suitability concerns because of some Islamophobic officials who presented false

testimonies under the penalty of perjury intentionally and maliciously, no scientific

research for the best interest of the United States and the American People because of the

desire of the corruption, the cowards, and traitors, and no Constitutional monetary

compensations to recover from the intentional harm and damages so he can at least seek '

his self-employment opportunity and live with dignity. Instead, the Respondents can only

offer more intentional and systematic abuse and torture against the Petitioner, so he

suffers to death. In other words, obstruction of justice and intentional and systematic

abuse and torture. In other words, the highest treason to the United States and a coup

against the United States Constitution as formally proven and evidenced in the related

cases section reference above and the documented EEO formal complaints dockets.

Hence, the Petitioner is demanding JUSTICE!

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

The Department of Defense (DOD) published the AI Strategy to the public

recently. In the published strategy, the DOD adopted portions of the aggrieved

complainant’s scientific and formal findings about Information Security, AI, and Legacy

Information Systems (LIS) without giving credit to his scientific work and in a direct

violation to the intellectual property and copyrights laws. The aggrieved complainant was

the first AI scientist and researcher in the entire field who discovered, studied, and

researched the relations between Information Security, AI and LIS as formally and

scientifically proven and documented in his Ph.D.’s formal documents and resume.

•

Dissertation Topic/Area of Research: Information Security, AI, and LIS.

Dissertation/Publication Information: Published by ProQuest LLC (2015).

•

Library of Congress Certificate of Registration Number: TX 8-152-561.

•

Effective Date of Registration: December 30, 2015.

The worst part that they integrated these stolen portions in the worst AI strategy

the United States may consider. As an AI scientist/researcher, I formally declare that I am

scientifically capable to challenge and crush strongly and firmly any adverse assertions

by any AI scientist/researcher claiming something else in a fair and unbiased Jury Trial.

The decision belongs to the respectful jurors and the American People only and not any

public official. Likewise, the decision of the merit of this case belongs to the respectful

jurors and the American People only and not any public official or judicial officer.

Judicial officers are not Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) and legally and scientifically

uncappable to decide the merit of this case. According to the United States Constitution,

judicial officers are not allowed to communicate and coordinate with the Respondents

secretly and informally aiming to obstruct justice and cause more severe harm and

damages against the aggrieved Petitioner. According to the United States Constitution, no

judicial officer is allowed to prevent any citizen from his or her Constitutional rights

including the right for review by Jury. According to the United States Constitution,

judicial officers are not allowed to practice unlawful discrimination, retaliation, and be

extremely biased and prejudiced against the aggrieved victims because of their federally

protected classes, statuses, and Constitutional activities such as the Petitioner. According

to the United States Constitution, judicial officers are not allowed to abuse and torture the

aggrieved Petitioner by keeping obstructing justice illegally because they are biased

against him because of his protected classes and protected statuses. The involved judicial

officers understand the truthful and legitimate Complaints filed by the aggrieved

Petitioner. However, the maliciously stated that it is infirm and not clear and dismissed it

illegally and repeatedly under the “frivolous” false and malicious excuse to cover the

crimes and the violations. The evidence is that the aggrieved Petitioner went to the Pro Se

Clinic in the same District Court and the attorney told him that based on the notes he see

in the system the Judge wanted me to “clean it” from the formally documented, proven,

and evidenced corruption. This confirms the President of the United States statement to

the public that “the system is rigged and corrupted.'" However, because the aggrieved

Petitioner is suffering massively from the ongoing injustice and crimes and is being

abused and tortured to death, he removed the names of the involved criminals under the

illegal pressure as they kept escalating the hate crimes against him as this huge task

“fighting corruption” is supposed to be the FG’s task and not the aggrieved Petitioner.

Therefore, he filed the second and even the third lawsuit cases in good faith and to the

best of his knowledge and abilities and requested his Constitutional Relief only.

However, the radically extreme hate kept escalating against the aggrieved Petitioner as

the hate crimes were escalated as the few involved judicial officers kept abusing the

truthful and legitimate lawsuit cases in a serious COUP against the United States

Constitution. This is called radically extreme hate against the aggrieved Petitioner

because he is a proud Muslim-American patriot.

Additionally, some Respondents such as the ODNI and NSA abused the formal

EEO process and coordinated illegally with the few involved judicial officers aiming to

steal additional sensitive scientific discoveries and critical information from the

Petitioner. Everything has been formally documented, proven, and evidenced. When the

Petitioner discovered, formally documented, evidenced, and exposed the malicious plan,

the District Court closed the third lawsuit case illegally retaliatory! The FG is now

following the “hush-hush” philosophy because the wrongdoers are kings and above the

law and because the aggrieved Petitioner is a citizen with no legal rights, defending

justice, and belongs to the Muslim-American minority.

The aggrieved Petitioner is a proud Muslim-American patriot and he was looking

to serve his country and to resolve the major economic and other issues as formally

documented and presented to the Honorable Courts and federal agencies. However, he

was never allowed one and only one EEO illegally as formally documented, proven, and

evidenced in the related cases and the EEO dockets. Therefore, the aggrieved Petitioner is

seeking his Constitutional Relief so he can survive, recover, and seek his legitimate selfemployment opportunity. However, the few involved judicial officers are obstructing

justice continuously.

Act of 1976. The Copyright Act prevents the unauthorized copying of a work of

authorship. Copyrights can be registered in the Copyright Office in the Library of

Congress, but newly created works do not need to be registered. In fact, it is no longer

necessary to even place a copyright notice on a work for it to be protected by copyright

law.

Quoted from: https://www.bitlaw.com/copyright/index.html

NEGLIGENCE AND TORT

As of the date and time of this Complaint, the aggrieved Petitioner has not seen

anything other than injustice, extreme bias, prejudice, violations, hate crimes, and pain

within the last decade in a direct violation to the United States Constitution and the

Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). The FG is responsible about protecting the aggrieved

citizens and the small minorities like the aggrieved Petitioner from the ongoing injustice.

According to the United States Constitution, this responsibility is mandatory and not

optional. The Petitioner has suffered massively and is still currently suffering massively

to death from the formally proven, evidenced, and documented violations and ongoing

negligence and tort that allowed the corrupted officials to escalate the violations to reach

the hate crimes level against the Petitioner. The Petitioner is respectfully demanding from

the Honorable Court to grant his Constitutional Relief as soon as possible so he can

recover from the severe harm and damages caused to him as formally documented and

explained.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

The Petitioner’s religion (Muslim), race (Arab/Middle Eastern), national origin

(Syria) was subject for massive civil rights and EEO violations because of his protected

classes. The Petitioner has filed forty two formal EEO complaints as formally

documented in the related cases referenced above aiming to defend justice and to secure

himself a full-time permeant job based on one and only one EEO and based on merit and

his formal qualifications and skills, but the Respondents kept abusing his huge number of

jobs applications and kept selecting less qualified candidates illegally as formally proven,

documented, and evidenced because of his protected classes and escalated the retaliation

violations against him under the protected status to cause him sever harm and more

damages.

The Respondents are committing ongoing intentional and systematic unlawful

discrimination, retaliation, and corruption because of the Petitioner’s protected classes

and protected statuses as the Petitioner filed formal EEO formal complaints with the

involved federal agencies and because the Petitioner reported the corruption to several

federal agencies aiming to end the ongoing violations and hate crimes against him so he

can get his job, serve the United States of America, and to live with dignity.

Petitioner have suffered for years, currently suffering, and will continue to suffer

for substantial injury because of the Respondents' intentional and systematic violations

against the United States Constitution including the Civil Rights Act, and the EEO Act.

Hence, the aggrieved Petitioner is requesting his Constitutional Relief so he can survive,

recover, and seek his legitimate self-employment opportunity.

Therefore, and based on the facts presented above, the aggrieved Petitioner is

demanding his Constitutional Relief as soon as possible for the best interest of justice.

The Petitioner documented in the related cases and EEO dockets the formally

proven and evidenced Respondents violations against the United States Constitution as

the Respondents violated several laws and Acts including but not limited to:

Obstruction of Justice.

No Fear Act as described on https://www.justice.gov/jmd/no-fear-act-notice-november-22006

Title VII, Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 US.C. sec. 2000e et seq.

EEO Act of 1972.

The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978.

Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989, as amended.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects "all aspects of religious observance and

practice, as well as belief' 42 U.S.C. § 2000eG)'

An agency official shall not discriminate against an employee or applicant based on race,

color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability (or handicapping condition), marital

status, or political affiliation. 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(1).

(

;

An agency official shall not intentionally deceive or obstruct anyone from competing for

employment. 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(4).

An agency official shall not influence anyone to withdraw from competition in order to

improve or injure the employment prospects of any person. 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(5).

An employer may not base hiring decisions on stereotypes and assumptions about a

person's race, color, religion, sex (including gender identity, sexual orientation, and

pregnancy), national origin, age (40 or older), disability or genetic information.

Prohibited personnel practices (PPPs) are employment-related activities that are banned

in the federal workforce because they violate the merit system through some form of

employment discrimination, retaliation, improper hiring practices, or failure to adhere to

laws, rules, or regulations that directly concern the merit system principles.

An agency official shall not request or consider a recommendation based on political

connections or influence. 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(2).

An agency official shall not retaliate because an employee: 1. filed a complaint,

grievance or appeal; et seq. 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(9).

The United States Constitution prevent the wrongdoing and the violations. The

Petitioner is an aggrieved “Pro Se” and not an attorney and do not know how to

document the violations as an attorney but he believes that the Honorable Court can

clearly understand what the Petitioner is presenting in good faith, to the best extent of his

knowledge and ability, and for the best interest ofjustice.

Based on the absolute facts presented in good faith in this truthful and legitimate

Petition and under the Statement of Facts section above. The Petitioner is entitled for the

requested Constitutional Relief. There is NO doubt that a fair and unbiased Jury Trial will

GRANT the Petitioner’s Constitutional Relief and will hold the FG’s involved officials

accountable about the intentional and systematic hate crimes and the serious violations

occurred against the aggrieved Petitioner. Therefore, the few involved judicial officers

kept closing the undersigned lawsuit cases arbitrary, discriminatory, retaliatory, and

unconstitutionally in a blatant challenge to the United States Constitution that prohibit the

formally documented and evidenced wrongdoing and in a total biased and extremely

prejudice manner.

The Petitioner has suffered, still suffering, and will continue to suffer due to the

ongoing injustice and the intentional and systematic obstruction ofjustice and because of

the wrongdoing, violations, and hate crimes.

The aggrieved Petitioner experienced very hard and difficult life events due to the

Respondents’ ongoing violations that prevented him from securing himself one and only

one EEO and a stable job based on his formal qualifications and skills fairly and equally

as set forth by the United States Constitution. Hence, due to the ongoing unlawful

discrimination, retaliation, and absence of justice since years, my life was destroyed

completely. I am currently suffering from the severe, extreme, and massive injustice

caused to me by the Respondents. My life was destroyed completely because of the

Respondents unlawful discrimination, retaliation, evidenced violations, and hate crimes. I

am suffering from the severe harm and damages caused to me by the unlawful

discrimination and retaliation and the Respondents formally proven, documented, and

evidenced violations and hate crimes. I suffered and I am still currently suffering from

divorce, evictions, bankruptcy, homelessness, repossession, emotional distress and pain,

loss of enjoyment of life, injury to professional standing, injury to character and

reputation, injury to credit standing, serious medical issues in the heart and chronic

pain in the liver and lungs due to the inhumane living conditions the FG is forcing me to

live at, and the inability to eat more than once a day due to severe poverty caused to me

by the Respondents because of the ongoing unlawful discrimination, retaliation,

intellectual property copyrights laws violations, and negligence and tort since years.

Furthermore, I am suffering from serious medical issues in the heart and chronic pain in

the liver and the lungs due to the ongoing abuse and torture and the inhumane living

conditions the FG is forcing me to live in illegally. Everything has been documented,

proven, and evidenced formally in the dockets. The scandals were proven, documented,

and evidenced.

The United States Constitution prohibit the intentional and systematic violations

and crimes against the citizens Bill of Rights. The United States Constitution prohibit the

unlawful discrimination, retaliation, negligence and tort, and intellectual property

copyrights laws violations in addition to all wrongdoing formally documented and

evidenced in the related cases and EEO dockets.

According to the United States Constitution:

The Civil Rights Act of 1991

TITLE I - FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS REMEDIES

DAMAGES IN CASES OF INTENTIONAL DISCRIMINATION

SEC. 102

The Revised Statutes are amended by inserting after section 1977 (42 U.S.C. 1981) the

following new section:

“SEC. 1977A. DAMAGES IN CASES OF INTENTIONAL DISCRIMINATION IN

EMPLOYMENT. [42 U.S.C. 1981a]

“(a) RIGHT OF RECOVERY. “(1) CIVIL RIGHTS. - In an action brought by a complaining party under

section 706 or 717 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e-5) against

a respondent who engaged in unlawful intentional discrimination (not an

employment practice that is unlawful because of its disparate impact)

prohibited under section 703, 704, or 717 of the Act (42 U.S.C. 2000e-2 or

2000e-3), and provided that the complaining party cannot recover under section

1977 of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1981), the complaining party may

recover compensatory and punitive damages as allowed in subsection (b), in

addition to any relief authorized by section 706(g) of the Civil Rights Act of

1964, from the respondent.

“(b) COMPENSATORY AND PUNITIVE DAMAGES. “(2) EXCLUSIONS FROM COMPENSATORY DAMAGES. - Compensatory

damages awarded under this section shall not include backpay, interest on

backpay, or any other type of relief authorized under section 706(g) of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964.

“(3) LIMITATIONS. - The sum of the amount of compensatory damages

awarded under this section for future pecuniary losses, emotional pain,

suffering, inconvenience, mental anguish, loss of enjoyment of life, and other

nonpecuniary losses, and the amount of punitive damages awarded under this

section, shall not exceed, for each complaining party -

“(D) in the case of a respondent who has more than 500 employees in

each of 20 or more calendar weeks in the current or preceding calendar

year, $300,000.

“(4) CONSTRUCTION. - Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the

scope of, or the relief available under, section 1977 of the Revised Statutes (42

U.S.C. 1981).

“(c) JURY TRIAL. - If a complaining party seeks compensatory or punitive damages

under this section “(1) any party may demand a trial by jury; and

“(2) the court shall not inform the jury of the limitations described in subsection (b)(3).

“(d) DEFINITIONS. - As used in this section:

“(2) DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICE. - The term ‘discriminatory Practice’ means the

discrimination described in paragraph (1), or the discrimination or the violation described

in paragraph (2), of subsection (a).

Quoted from: https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/cra-1991.cfin

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Petitioner hereby requested his Constitutional Relief for the best interest of justice

as the truthful documented facts in the EEO formal dockets are completely obvious and

needs no further delay that will cause the undersigned more severe harm and damages as

he is currently suffering to death. The undersigned respectfully requested an expedited

jury trial from the District Court on all issues raised in this complaint if a trial is deemed

necessary by the Honorable Court.

SUPREME COURT

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States. Article III of the

United States Constitution created the Supreme Court and authorized Congress to pass

laws establishing a system of lower courts.

FEDERAL COURTS

According to the United States Constitution, federal courts have jurisdiction over

cases involving, the United States government, the Constitution, or federal laws. Federal

courts are obligated to hear cases involving the constitutionality of a law.

The federal courts have jurisdiction over

•

Cases that raise a "federal question" involving the United States Government, the

U.S. Constitution, or other federal laws; and

•

Cases involving “diversity of citizenship," which are disputes between two parties

not from the same state or country, and where the claim meets a set dollar

threshold for damages.

The federal judiciary operates separately from the executive and legislative

branches. Federal judges work to ensure equal justice under the law.

RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY

The United States Constitution guarantees the right to trial by jury for most

criminal and many civil matters. See Amendments V, VI, and VII.

According to the United States Constitution, 28 U.S. Code § 1861. Declaration of

policy: It is the policy of the United States that all litigants in federal courts entitled

to trial by jury shall have the right to grand and petit juries selected at random from a

fair cross section of the community in the district or division wherein the court convenes.

JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT

According to the Code of Conduct for United States Judges which was initially

adopted by the Judicial Conference on April 5, 1973, and was known as the “Code of

Judicial Conduct for United States Judges.”

The Code of Conduct for United States Judges includes the ethical canons that

apply to federal judges and provides guidance on their performance of official duties and

engagement in a variety of outside activities.

Canon 1: A Judge Should Uphold the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary

An independent and honorable judiciary is indispensable to justice in our society.

A judge should maintain and enforce high standards of conduct and should personally

observe those standards, so that the integrity and independence of the judiciary may be

preserved. The provisions of this Code should be construed and applied to further that

objective.

Canon 2: A Judge Should Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety in All

Activities

A. Respect for Law. A judge should respect and comply with the law and should

act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and

impartiality of the judiciary.

B. Outside Influence. A judge should not allow family, social, political,

financial, or other relationships to influence judicial conduct or judgment. A

judge should neither lend the prestige of the judicial office to advance the private

interests of the judge or others nor convey or permit others to convey the

impression that they are in a special position to influence the judge. A judge

should not testify voluntarily as a character witness.

C. Nondiscriminatorv Membership. A judge should not hold membership in

any organization that practices invidious discrimination on the basis of race, sex,

religion, or national origin.

A judge should avoid lending the prestige of judicial office to advance the

private interests of the judge or others.

Canon 3: A Judge Should Perform the Duties of the Office Fairly, Impartially and

Diligently

The duties ofjudicial office take precedence over all other activities. The judge

should perform those duties with respect for others, and should not engage in

behavior that is harassing, abusive, prejudiced, or biased. The judge should adhere to

the following standards:

A. Adjudicative Responsibilities.

(1) A judge should be faithful to, and maintain professional competence

in, the law and should not be swayed by partisan interests, public clamor,

or fear of criticism.

(2) A judge should hear and decide matters assigned, unless

disqualified, and should maintain order and decorum in all judicial

proceedings.

(3) A judge should be patient, dignified, respectful, and courteous to

litigants, jurors, witnesses, lawyers, and others with whom the judge deals

in an official capacity. A judge should require similar conduct by those

subject to the judge’s control, including lawyers to the extent consistent

with their role in the adversary process.

(4) A judge should accord to every person who has a legal interest in a

proceeding, and that person’s lawyer, the full right to be heard

according to law.

(5) A judge should dispose promptly of the business of the court.

(6) A judge should not make public comment on the merits of a

matter pending or impending in any court. A judge should require

similar restraint by court personnel subject to the judge’s direction and

control. The prohibition on public comment on the merits does not extend

to public statements made in the course of the judge’s official duties, to

explanations of court procedures, or to scholarly presentations made for

purposes of legal education.

C. Disqualification.

(1) A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the

judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned, including but not limited to

instances in which:

(a) the judge has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or

personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the

proceeding;

Canon 3B (6). Public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the

judiciary is promoted when judges take appropriate action based on reliable information

of likely misconduct.

RIGHT OF REVIEW

5 U.S. Code § 702. Right of review

A person suffering legal wrong because of agency action, or adversely affected or

aggrieved by agency action within the meaning of a relevant statute, is entitled to judicial

review thereof. An action in a court of the United States seeking relief other than money

damages and stating a claim that an agency or an officer or employee thereof acted or

failed to act in an official capacity or under color of legal authority shall not be dismissed

nor relief therein be denied on the ground that it is against the United States or that the

United States is an indispensable party. The United States may be named as a defendant

in any such action, and a judgment or decree may be entered against the United States:

Provided, That any mandatory or injunctive decree shall specify the Federal officer or

officers (by name or by title), and their successors in office, personally responsible for

compliance.

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

Respondents United States of America et al., are all federal agencies sued in their

official capacities. The Respondents were acting under color of law because the

Respondents were obligated by the United States Constitution to uphold the United States

Constitution and to prevent the unlawful discrimination against the protected classes,

retaliation under the protected statuses, and because of the negligence on preventing the

ongoing wrongdoing occurring against the aggrieved Petitioner which caused him sever

harm and damages.

On July 2016 the Petitioner sent a formal correspondence to the Former President

of the United States, President Barack Obama and shared a copy of that correspondence

with the FBI to legally inform them about the wrongdoing and to defend justice. The FBI

ignored the July 2016’s formal letter sent by the aggrieved complainant to the President

of the United States, while the FBI is the responsible Agency about upholding the United

States Constitution. President Obama, the highest official in the executive branch, sent

the aggrieved Petitioner a formal response acknowledging and confirming the FG’s

awareness about the documented facts and issues and recommended the Petitioner to go

through the EEO process and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).

The FBI is responsible about preventing the intentional and the systematic wrongdoing

including the intentional and systematic hate crimes and civil rights violations, and the

EEO violations. The FBI is responsible about preventing the intentional and systematic

violations occurring against the aggrieved Petitioner by the racial and Islamophobic

officials and to end the reckless fascism. However, the FBI has failed to prevent the

ongoing violations. Instead the FBI is now involved in the violations against the

aggrieved Petitioner and the illegal escalation against his constitutional rights. The FBI

retaliated against the aggrieved complainant because of his protected and legal activities

including the whistleblower reprisal as formally proven. The aggrieved Petitioner

believes that the majority of the Agency’s and the FG employees are great and ethical

officials. However, the corrupted, discriminatory, and retaliatory officials are responsible

about the formally documented and evidenced violations and the hate crimes as their

crimes are escalating massively and exceeded all limits as they are damaging the best

interest of the United States and the American People.

The Petitioner is a proud Muslim-American patriot and he was looking to serve

the United States and to resolve the major economic and other issues and to get Nobel

Prize in Economic Sciences by utilizing AI as formally described in the scientifically

proven strategy presented to the IC. However, the racisim and the corruption are

obstructing such noble ultimate goals.

The Petitioner respects the FG and the FBI; however, the Petitioner realized the

FBI’s wrong decision about ignoring preventing the massive civil rights and EEO

violations as this is a unique situation. The Petitioner refuses the corruption, racisim,

wrongdoing, and injustice. Therefore, he followed President Obama’s recommendation to

go through the EEO process formally. However, the Petitioner discovered that the EEO

process is also being abused as the EEO Offices are completely biased toward the

Agencies against him the aggrieved Petitioner as he witnessed massive amount of

corruption and violations as formally documented.

On 12/28/2018, the Petitioner field a civil/EEO lawsuit case 8:18-cv-02301-SJOJC with the United States Central District Court of California - Southern Division against

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., “nine Respondents including the FBI.” On

01/08/2018, the Court dismissed the lawsuit case, dismissed all motions including to

appoint a counsel and requests, and closed the lawsuit ease without even stating if the

Petitioner is allowed to Amend and without even stating any appeal rights. Instead, the

Order presented unnecessary criticism “judicial misconduct” based on a personal

misunderstanding of the Petitioner’s scientific project while this criticism is not from an

AI scientist/researcher “mocking” the Petitioner’s project noble goals and undermining

the huge outcomes of the major scientific discoveries without even understanding it! On

01/08/2019, the Court closed the lawsuit case. Here, with full respect to all Honorable

Judges and with full respect to the Honorable Courts, the Petitioner needs to confirm that

as an AI scientist/researcher, the Petitioner is formally declaring that any scientific

argument related to the scientific field is restricted for AI scientists/researchers.

The Petitioner continued his ethical and legitimate efforts to defend justice and filed a

Request for Further Review by the DAG against the FBI. Formal Appeal OARM-WB

No. 19-7 (closed on 09/05/2019) documenting the FBI’s and the FG’s ongoing

intentional and systematic violations against the aggrieved complainant since years

because of his protected classes, protected statuses, and the federally protected legal

activities. However, the Respondents escalated the massive and the major violations

against the Petitioner in a blatant challenge to the United States Constitution.

On 07/25/2019, the Petitioner field the second civil/EEO lawsuit case 8:19-cv01434-DOC-E with the United States Central District Court of California - Southern

Division against the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., “sixteen Respondents

including the FBI.” On 08/05/2019, the Court dismissed the second lawsuit case again

illegally and in an abusive and arbitrary manner, dismissed all motions including to

appoint a counsel and requests, and closed the lawsuit case one more time.

On 08/06/2019, the Petitioner filed the Notice of Appeal, Appealing the District

Court’s decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Appeal

number 19-55926. However, on 09/16/2019, the Appeals Court dismissed the Petitioner’s

truthful and legitimate Appeal illegally and in an abusive and arbitrary manner as well!

On same day, the Petitioner field the Petition for Rehearing En Banc with the

Ninth Circuit. Also, on 09/23/2019, the Petitioner fielded the Motion for Reconsideration

as well. However, the Court held the case without making any decision till 12/31/2019,

when the undersigned was being hospitalized by an Ambulance to the Emergency Room

for severe Chest and heart muscle pain. They issued the Order to dismiss and completely

the Appeal immediacy within one hour from dialing 911 and while the undersigned was

being rescued inside the Emergency Room while the undersigned was only demanding

his Constitutional Relief nothing else confirming one more time that the IC is using

intelligence capabilities illegally and to win EEO complaints and to coordinate with the

few involved judicial officers! It is important to confirm that the aggrieved Petitioner

documented and evidenced massive amount of similar violations. In fact, the Department

of Navy presented a formal document voluntarily confirming the illegal spying activities

of the IC against the aggrieved Petitioner and against the United States Constitution.

On 01/02/2020, the Petitioner filed the third civil/EEO, intellectual property,

negligence and tort lawsuit case 8:20-cv-00002-DOC-E with the United States Central

District Court of California - Southern Division against the UNITED STATES OF

AMERICA et al., “seventeen Respondents including the FBI.” The Petitioner filed a

Written Application for Emergency Relief under Local Rule 77-1 because of the serious

medical issues in the heart and the chronic pain in the liver and the lungs and the severe

injustice he is suffering from. However, the Court dismissed and closed the lawsuit case

again illegally and in a serious COUP against the United States Constitution on

01/24/2020 without granting the Constitutional Relief and without paying attention to the

undersigned’s serious medical condition causing him to suffer more from the ongoing

injustice and injury!

On 01/22/2020, the Petitioner has filed a Motion for Publication of Records with

the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) reporting the IC’s

wrongdoing and the desperate situation to FISC and requested from the FISC to publish

the Petitioner’s records for the American People based on the transparency principle so

the American People can leam about the reasons that caused the FG and the IC to abuse

the Petitioner and torture him to death illegally and in a blatant challenge to the United

States Constitution.

As of the date of this Petition, the FISC did not grant the Petitioner’s Motion.

On 01/27/2020, the Petitioner filed the Notice of Appeal, Appealing the District

Court’s decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Appeal

number 20-55111.

On 02/02/2020, the Petitioner filed a Motion for Emergency Relief Under

Circuit Rule 27-3 demanding his Constitutional Relief. On 02/04/2020, the Clerk of the

Appeals Court filed an Order requiring the Petitioner to file either a Motion to Dismiss or

a Statement that the Appeal should go forward. On same day, the Petitioner has filed a

Statement that the Appeal should go forward confirming that the lawsuit case and Appeal

are not frivolous in addition to a Notice of Delay as his Emergency Motion Under Circuit

Rule 27-3 was due by 02/03/2020. This delay is increasing the serious risk and danger

against his life as he is suffering from serious medical issues in the heart and chronic pain

in the liver and the lungs due to the inhuman living conditions the FG forced him to live

and due to the ongoing intentional and systematic violations and hate crimes against him.

As of the date of this Petition, the Appeals Court did not grant the Petitioner’s

Constitutional Relief and ignored the truthful and legitimate Emergency Motion illegally

and in a serious arbitrary manner. It has been formally confirmed, proven, documented,

and evidenced that the few involved judicial officers are obstructing justice and

coordinating with the IC. They refused to defend justice and to allow me to have one and

only one EEO illegally. Furthermore, they are refusing to grant my Constitutional Relief

illegally, so I suffer more from the illegally ongoing abuse and torture to death as they are

ripping-off and stealing my Constitutional monetary compensations. This is called

obstruction of justice, COUP against the United States Constitution, and the highest

treason to the United States of America and the American People.

There is NO legitimacy for the unconstitutional orders granted as it is all not

judicial in nature! NO LEGITIMACY! Their actions are NOT judicial in nature and

established a wide 1983 truthful and legitimate case. Also, there is NO legitimacy for any

possible upcoming retaliation against the aggrieved Petitioner after this truly

Constitutional, truthful, ethical, and brave Petition. They destroyed the aggrieved

Petitioner’s life already. He was waiting for justice for over a decade but ended up being

abused and tortured to death instead as formally documented and evidenced. They stole

his money and his Constitutional Relief. It has been formally confirmed and evidenced

that they contempt the United States Constitution and the Judicial Branch’s great

reputation in its entirety. They are undermining the prestige of our great nation. They are

damaging the great reputation of the FG and the United States for the best interest of

corruption and injustice. They interpret aggrieved citizens patience as weakness! They

cannot understand that there is a limit for everything.

The aggrieved Petitioner believes that the majority of the great men and women

within the respectful FG who are serving our great nation deserves the Supreme Court’s

attention about the wrongdoing of the few corrupt and racial officials within the three

branches. The few corrupt and racial officials should never be allowed to damage the

great reputation of our great FG and the best interest of justice and the American People.

According to the United States Constitution, the EEOC’s website, and all formal

documents sent to the Petitioner by the Respondents including the formal FADs, the

Petitioner do have the right to go to the District Court, request an appointment of counsel,

and to waive related Court fees if necessary.

The Respondents sent the Petitioner formal documents stating the following:

Right to File a Civil Action

You also have the right to file a civil action in a United States District Court:

(a) Within 90 days of receipt of the final action on an individual or class

complaint if no appeal has been filed;

(b) After 180 days from the date of filing an individual or class complaint if an

appeal has not been filed and final action has not been taken;

(d) After 180 days from the date of filing an appeal with the Commission if there

has been no final decision by the Commission. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.407.

However, the EEOC and Respondents did not state in that the few involved

judicial officers can coordinate with federal agencies and IC to close the aggrieved

Petitioner’s lawsuit cases illegally because of his protected classes and federally

protected activities and to cover the hate crimes and to abuse him and torture him to

death! Nothing is written in the United States Constitution is stating that the federal

government is allowed to crush my human, civil, and EEO rights and to steal my

constitutional compensations and intellectual property because I wanted to serve the best

interest of the United States and resolve the national debt scientifically! Nothing is

written in the United States Constitution is stating that the Respondents can use

intelligence capabilities illegally and unethically to win EEO formal complaints as

formally evidenced and documented. Nothing written in the United States Constitution

states that the involved officials can escalate the hate crimes against the Petitioner and

fabricate false claims against him to increase the injustice and hate crimes against him

because he is a proud Muslim-American patriot. Nothing is written states that those

involved officials can remain in their official positions illegally and the Respondents

attorneys should cover them and protect them illegally no matter ofjustice and no matter

of law! Nothing is written in the United States Constitution states that the few involved

judicial officers can coordinate with the Respondents and keep closing the Petitioner’s

truthful and legitimate lawsuit cases illegally! The question is, that the Petitioner has

exposed the scandals formally and is presenting it legally to the Supreme Court, and that

it has been formally proven and evidenced that the involved officials are violating the

United States Constitution intentionally and systematically, what is the Supreme Court’s

decision!

The list of the formally documented, proven, and evidenced violations and crimes

in the related cases referenced above including the EEO dockets are:

1. Intentional and systematic unlawful discrimination.

2. Intentional and systematic retaliation.

3. Whistleblower reprisal.

4. Abuse of authority.

5. Mismanagement.

6. Bias against the victim and the aggrieved complainant.

7. Fraud, forgery, and fabricating formal documents.

8. Spying on the aggrieved complainant illegally.

9. Administrative corruption.

10. Presenting false information and using unethical tactics to go around the law and

the justice.

11. Intentional waste and improper usage of the federal funds.

12. Disregarding the formal complaints of an aggrieved complainant to illegally and

unethically cover and protect the corrupted and discriminatory officials against

the justice.

13. Monopolizing the official positions and marginalizing and preventing the most

qualified applicant because of the protected classes and statuses and because of

his exceptional scientific knowledge that will end corruption permanently as

proven scientifically and that will resolve many major issues that United States is

suffering from.

14. Working on increasing the destabilization in the country and undermining the

prestige of the nation and the American values.

15. Working as if the United States Federal Agencies are personal or private

properties and not public agencies that belongs the nation and the American

people.

16. Practicing and spreading the fascism.

17. Intentional increase of the sectarianism hates between the American people.

18. Obstruction of justice.

19. Working against the benefit of the national security and keeping the national

security at risk as they are intentionally preventing the proven scientific

knowledge illegally from serving the United States.

20. The highest treason to the Oath, the Constitution, and the United States.

Finally, the aggrieved Petitioner is formally declaring that he is demanding his

Constitutional Relief as formally documented in the related cases referenced above

including the pending Appeal with the Ninth Circuit 20-55111. Again, the aggrieved

Petitioner is formally declaring that the only “NO” Constitutional Relief he will accept is

from the respectful jurors and based on a fair and unbiased jury trial. The aggrieved

Petitioner is completely confident in his truthful case and truthful position and that the

respectful jurors and the American People cannot accept the injustice which the

undersigned has suffered from and is currently suffering from now massively.

The United States Constitution is the word and the decision of the American

People. According to the United States Constitution, no one is above the law. The

violations and the hate crimes documented and explained in this truthful and legitimate

Petition are prohibited. There is NO LEGITIMACY for the unconstitutional orders issued

in the lower by the few involved judicial officers. No public official within the entire

FG’s three branches is allowed to overturn the American People’s Constitution illegally.

No public official alive today is better or more loyal than Thomas Jefferson who stated:

"The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the

second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the

legalized version of the first." Thomas Jefferson

"When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty." Thomas Jefferson

REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION

1. To defend the best interest of the United States, the American People, and justice

and to uphold the United States Constitution.

2. To restore the American People and the public trust to the best extent including

the aggrieved Muslim-American minority in addition to all other minorities in the

judicial system.

3. To restore the American People and public trust to the best extent including the

aggrieved Muslim-American minority in addition to all other minorities in the

executive branch.

4. To restore the law and order principle to the United States of America and to end

the chaos situation and the disgrace level our great nation has reached.

5. To protect the great reputation of the FG including the three branches and to

prevent few corrupt and racial officials from damaging this great reputation.

6. To stop the few judicial officers involved from misusing the law and to stop

dismissing the citizens and victims’ truthful and legitimate cases under the most

popular malicious and false excuse “frivolous” that they use to cover those who

they believe they are above the law including officials within the FG and the IC.

7. To remind the few judicial officers involved that they are not kings and above the

law and that they are working for the American People and serving the United

States and not any special interest and to set their personal desires, interests, and

opinions a side and to uphold the United States Constitution and to defend justice

according to the law.

8. To remind the few judicial officers involved that the judicial officers cannot

decriminalize, normalize, and coverup the Constitutional crimes and violations as

the judicial branch is responsible about the checks and balances principle.

9. To hold the wrongdoers and the law violators accountable about their formally

documented and evidenced violations and crimes regardless of their sensitive and

powerful positions within the FG.

10. To put a serious end for the reckless escalation of the corruption levels against the

best interest of the United States, the American People, national security, and

justice.

11. To restore the public trust in the integrity of the EEO system and to require the

FG to obey the United States Constitution including the Merit System laws and

regulations and to stop excluding the aggrieved Muslim-American minority and

all other minorities from the diversity strategies as marginalization is prohibited.

12. To restore the public trust in the integrity of the intellectual property operation

and related copyrights law in its entirety and to end the copyrights violations as

the FG’s officials are not above the law.

13. To direct the Federal Courts to handle the Constitutional responsibilities instead

of closing the truthful and legitimate lawsuit cases repeatedly and in an abusive

and illegal manner and to be extremely careful about the best interest ofjustice

and the aggrieved victims such as the aggrieved Petitioner.

14. To prove that the Supreme Court of the United States is capable to resolve the

most complicated and the biggest challenges such as the serious violations and

crimes documented and evidenced in this Petition and the related cases referenced

above.

15. To present the judicial branch’s word to the American People about the serious

escalation of the racisim and fascism wave that swept our great nation within the

last few years massively.

16. To prevent the FG from ripping-off and stealing the Constitutional Reliefs of the

aggrieved citizens, victims, and self-represented litigants fighting for justice to the

best of their knowledge and abilities and to adhere to the United States

Constitution honestly.

17. To remind the IC officials that they are not above the law and that they should

respect and obey the United States Constitution and to stop misusing the

intelligence capabilities and to work for the best interest of the United States and

the American People and not the special interests of the billionaires in top.

18. To direct the FG to go toward the right direction and to work toward resolving the

national debt scientifically and to save the taxpayers funds instead of allowing

some corrupt officials to serve the best interest of the billionaires in top.

19. To send a clear message to the American People that the Supreme Court is the

Court of the American People and the United States no matter of how huge the

challenge is.

20. To prove practically that no one is above the law and that all people are equal in

front of the law including the most aggrieved citizens from the most aggrieved

minorities like the aggrieved Petitioner.

21. To keep the United States of America as the best country on earth.

CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, this Court should grant the Petition for Writ of

Certiorari.

DATED this 8th day of February 2020.

Respectfully submitted,

By. Zh. S/'ZWMZ) A'

Dr. AHMAD J. ALJINDI

PO Box 60753

Irvine, CA 92602

Cell: 951-742-9773

Email: Dr.Ahmad.Aljindi@outlook.com

Pro Se Litigant

APPENDIX A

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.