Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Darren Brady, Petitioner v. Sandra St. Pierre, et al.

coo,f--~

r

S+cKk -eG

e

Dk ~- \r cn 6 ~- UAv

~ -~~ e,

0

rc

,

.

0

ov

Oc

A AJ

1t14y 2

14CVk1O 54

'20/9

S4

AO/

*

----------------

c

+Le

-

UJ(c-c

A0\S COU#Of

/4'

EA6

N

cx

icc: - M

et

0

6o) q

RECEIVED

MAY 28 2019

OFF

OF THE C LEAK

1-fv

Vf.

(

167

4'k,

Sandra St. Pierre & N.H.. Dept. of Education

168

ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI FROM

169

170

171

New Hampshire Supreme Court

172

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI to THE U.S. Supreme court

173

174

175

From: Darren Brady

176

P.O. Box 44- Whitefield N.H. 03598-(603) 991-2023

177

QUESTIONS Presented.-

178

179

In

of Judges, Government, city, state law officials [is wrong] (Just to put an

180

American in jail etc.) and claiming immune under RSA 507-B: 2 (20:10), RSA 507-B: 4.IV

181

(supp.2018) and RSA 169-c: 31.(201. 4)) should not apply;

182

(A..E.D.RA) I'm a (JCV- College studen), and I was raped will you help please.

183

184

185

lxi All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page.

186

(TABLE OF CONTENTS :)

187

188

A: Decision of State court of appeals N.H. Supreme Court 2/22/2019 affirmed

189

order case # 2018-oo75 Final closed case

190

191

B: Decision of NH State Trial Court order dated 1/8/18 case #214-2017-CV-111

192

final denying my complaint

193

194

C: Decision of NH Superior order dated 12/7/2017- 1/8/18 return of service

195

196

197

D: I Witness statements the police and prosecutor refused to show the judge and

198

complaints against coos county superior court judge Peter H. Bernstein and

199

complaints against NH Supreme court judge to THE { U.S. Dept. of justice, Civil

200

Ridhts Complaints, NHBA Dispute Resolution Committee, Legislative Ethics

201

Committee, JCC,Complaints to the Supreme court about the Supreme court judge

202

etc.) NH Federal court complaint # 1:19-cv-00147 D. Brady v. Whitefield police

203

dept. et al

204

205

206

E: Motion For reconsideration to The NH Supreme court of Appeal #11812019.

207

F: Darren Brady's (Brief and Merits) NH Supreme court 8/22/2018; which shows

208

proof hat all the defendants had knowledge of the legal matter.

)

.

209

210

G: Darren Brady's Brief Report of the lower court rulings/ service to all

211

defendants, Brady police complaint

212

213

H: False Arrest # 451 -2017-CR-173 coos county court legal paperwork

214

215

I: (Darren Brady's Objection) to defendant's (Motion of Objection) to my (Motion

216

to amend brief and provide transcript)

217

218

219

220

OPINIONS BELOW ........................................................................................................ 1

221

(INDEX TO APPENDICES

222

223

lc

~~J

,

w

224

APPENDIX A: Decision of State court of appeals N.H. Supreme Court 2/22/2019

225

affirmed order case # 2018-0075 Final closed case

226

227

APPENDIX B: Decision of NH State Tria1Court order dated 1/8/18 case #214-2017-

228

CV-111 final denying my complaint

\

OP L iZtyJ9

LI

229

230

APPENDIX C: Decision of NH Superior order dated 12/7/2017- 1/8/18 return of

231

service

(/

Z.-)

(r

232

233

4/o)

234

Appendix D: I Withess statements the police and prosecutor refused to show the

235

judge and complaints against coos county superior court judge Peter H.

236

Bernstein and complaints against NH Supreme court judge to THE {U.S. Dept. of

237

justice, Civil Rights Complaints, NHBA Dispute Resolution Committee, Legislative

238

239

Ethics Committee, JCC, Complaints to the Supreme court about the Supreme

240

Court judge etc.} NH Federal court complaint# 1:19-cv-00147 D. Brady v.

241

Whitefield police dept. et al

242

243

APPENDIX E: ,Motion For reconsideration to The NH Supreme court of Appeal

244

#/18/2019.

(' / Lo

3)

/

245

qJ

246

APPENDIX F: Darren Brady's {ref and Merits} NH Supreme court 8/22/2018;

247

which shows proof that all the defendants had knowledge of the legal matter.

248

249

APPENDIX G: Darren Brady's Brief Report of the lower court rulings/ service to all

250

defendants, Brady police complaint

Q / 4j3

251

252 (iFPENDlXH: False Arrest # 451 -2017-CR-173 coos county court legal paperwork

253

(

to defendant's {Motion of Objection} to

254 APPENDIX I: {Darren Brady's 4ection}

I

255

my (Motion to amend brief and provide transcript)

256

257

258

TABLE OFAUTHORITIES CITED: 28 U.S. Code § 2101, 28 U.S. Code § 1254, 28

259

U.S. Code § 1257

5"-

1. Cached

260

261

262

263

Oct 23, 2017- to a Portsmouth police charge of trying to impersonate a Department

of man had tried to impersonate a DCYF worker to sign out a student.

264

STATUTES AND RULES: Respectfully, The notifications required by Rule 29,4 (b)

265

or (c) have been made

...

..

266

IN THE

267

268

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

269

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

270

Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment below.

271

272

273

OPINIONS BELOW

274

275

[x] For cases from state courts:

276

The opinion of the highest state court to review the merits appears at

277

Appendix (A) to the petition and [xJ is unpublished.

278 1.

279 JURISDICTION

280

281

[x] For cases from state courts: NH Supreme court of Appeal

282

The date on which the highest state court decided my case was. 2/22/2019

283

A copy of that decision appears at Appendix. A

284

[xj A timely petition for [motion for reconsideration] was thereafter denied on the following

285

date: OCT. 30, 2018

286

,

287

Appears at Appendix .E [motion for reconsideration]

288

289

and a copy of the order denying rehearing

(JURISDICTION:)

The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under 28 U. S. C. § 1257(a).

290

291

{CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED:)

292

293

(a) Federal crime 18 U.S.C. s- 1001-false statements to law officers! judges (b) The Anti-

294

terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. no. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214

295

(AEDPA) aka (OBVIOUS CRIMINAL ACTIVITY) AND (COMMON SENCE OF LAW),

296

(c) IMPERSONATING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER VIRGINIA S-18:2-174 (d) N.H.

297

RSA 104:28-a false impersonation- California penal code s-148.5 false report to law, (e) 15

298

U.S.C. s-57b violations/rules (F.T.C.); (f) {RESPECTFULLY, I challenge defendants claim

299

to

300

Being immune under RSA 507-B: 2 (2010), RSA 507-B: 4.IV (supp.2018) and RSA 169-c: 31

301

(2014)} {with 18 U.S.C. s-1001- false statements to the law and (AEPPA) etc. Above and

302

below cited U.S. Law; (g) N.H. Rules of evidence 404 (b) s- 106- H: 13, H: 15 and s-625:9

303

(a);

304

(h) 18 U.S. Code chapter 2 Federal Trade Commission (a) (1) code s-45 UNFAIR

305

METHODS and 18 U.S. Code s-1038- false information to law officials and 18 U.S. Code s-

306

35- chapters (97) (lii) -(b) RECKLESS DISREGARD-imparting or false statements,

307

conveying false information- 18 U.S.C. s-1001; -(I) Federal false claims act 42 U.S.C. s-

308

1983- (31 U.S.C. s- 37293733 (FCA) s-641:4 (RSA 417- A:3-b.1.) section 644:11)

309

falsification; j) N.H. Anti bullying laws title (RSA) 354-A) Discrimination cite: MALICE

310

LAWS; US Legal Ethics Laws: United Nations Fair Treatment Laws

311

(K) VIOLATIONS OF RULES OF THE Superior COURT OF THE STATE OF NH. CIVIL

312

RIGHTS- (111 PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS RULE 12,9 MOTIONS- I, GENERAL

313

PRINCIPLES RULE 1.-u. COMMENCEMENT OF ACTION RULE 4.-iii. PLEADINGS

314

AND MOTIONS RULE 6. AND RULE 710/ALSO- V. DISCOVERY RULE 21. GENERAL

315

PROVISIONS- Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C.s 1983- NH FED. Court # 1:19-CV-00147-{The

316

"Hearsay Evidence Rule"} Intentional Defective police Investigations: Indian Penal Code-

317

318

Code of Criminal Procedure, chapter 12 -commencement of investigation: {Signing of

statements under Section 161 of the Cr.P.C.161h Amendment, RSA 104:28-a- RSA 541-A

319

section 104:28-a

-

320

321

322

STATEMENT OF THE CASE:

I

323

(A) I was falsely placed in jail, labeled a child abuser, beat up and raped many times

324

because, defendant Sandra St. Pierre (A.K.A. my Facebook stalker) purposely

325

impersonated police staff { C.A.C., ( child advocate center)-D.C.Y.F. Worker}on 14-7-17

326

coos docket # 451-17-1731 DEFENDANT S.Sgt. Pierre was handpicked by a NH police

327

officer on the witness stand to be the questing {C.A.C. Police officer helper} in the above

328

docket # 451-17-1731 and is thus, not immune from my complaint under RSA 507-B;4 or

329

RSA 507-13:2 because defendant is not a C.A.C. Officer and the C.A.C. Holds no knowledge

330

of (ANY) child questioned in their center in 13 State St. Groveton NH 03582; (603) 636-

331

1999- and in fact {NO NH C.A.C. Holds ANY K1NOWLEGE OF THE POLICE

332

.. Carroll county(603) 569-9840

QUSTIONING OF THE CHILD ANYPLACE IN NH

333

Grafton and Sullivan county (603) 653- 9012- Stratford county (603) 516-8100- greater

334

lakes (603) 524-5497 and ALL C.A.C. CENTERS IN NH- STATE THAT DEFENDANT

335

S.S.PIERRE DOES NOT WORK FOR THEM AND SHE HAS NEVER WORKED FOR

336

THEM. SHE HELPED GIVE FALSE INFORMATION TO COOS COUNTY COURT

337

(B)

338

in order to FOOL a U.S.A., N.H. Judge with false information, with the soul wish to give

339

me life or death, get me hurt/raped in jail, keep my mouth closed on the internet about her

340

school badly abusing school founds; for which Jefferson New Hampshire school is now

341

closed down.

342

(C)

343

(After I and many made tons of legal complaints against the A.K.A. Rich school (Jefferson

344

NH) receiving more money than the A.K.A. Poor school)

345

(D)

346

ALL the kids wrote statements and told the police that the so-called victim was outside with

347

them playing as too the town-bank-store Jilm/ cameras also shows.

348

(E

349

(#1) police had firsthand knowledge (given to them by me before my arrest) that defendant

350

S.Sgt. Pierre was my Facebook stalker; the police refused to listen to anyone on my behalf and

351

refused to pass relevant information to the judge; that most likely would of thrown the case

352

right out before ittv arrest in front of my neighbors in the light of the day. Police refused

353

('#2) as well as my complaints against the foster parents and new member of their house hold

-

354

that openly states on Facebook that she likes young girls.

355

(#3)

356

Complaints to DCYF or the police (against the frster parents and New house

357

hold member) wasn't showed to the judge as well as not one written statement by

358

other kids etc. stating that the so-called victim was in fact outside playing was not

359

given to the judge- instead the judge seen (#4) defendant S.ST Pierre [swore

360

prfessionai statement] of a (C.A. C Officer) and she is not a (G.A. C. child

361

advocate center officer) and the child had a legal right to talk to a real legal

362

professional and since the child did not talk to a real C.A. C worker, a real

363

[MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE) TOOK PLACE FOR US BOTH.

-

364

365

366

367

REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION:

RESPECTFULLY, {What's good for the goose is good for the gander)

368

369

370

371

372

373

374

A Providence man is being accused of impersonating a social worker while trying to

sign out a female high school student. The Portsmouth Police Department...

375

{Judicial Approach on Faulty Investigations} it should not be a double

376

slandered to when a judge suits to believe police officers swore testimonies on

377

the witness stand and use those police statements to send a human to legally

378

die; on the word of a police swore statement under oath. Respectfully, I am

379

asking the US Supreme court to also use the testimony of Don Stapleton

380

Whitefield police officer swore testimony under oath; in open court on the

381

witness stand; pointing to the defendant S.St.Peirre to be the legal C.A.C. (

382

child Advocate Center) legal police helper that helped question the so- called

383

victim over days and days of illegal torcher: in different illegal locations

2. Cached

to a Portsmouth police charge of trying to impersonate a Department

Oct 23, 2017

of man had tried to impersonate a DCYF worker to sign out a student.

...

...

384

around NH for which the real C.A.0 holds no knowledge of the illegal

385

questioning of the child, dates or others invalid and the defendants still have

386

not come up with legal names and legal locations of the REAL LOCATIONS

387

that was used to question the child. Respectfully,

388

(A) For example

389

It should be Illegal to take a bum off the street and dress them up as a professional police

390

helpers in order to help put a human- AMERICAN BORN in jail 'Thus, in the cases of a

391

defective investigation, the court has to be circumspect in evaluating the evidence and may

392

have to adopt an active and analytical role to ensure that truth is found by having recourse

393

to sec. 311 of Cr.P.0 {27} or at a later stage also restoring to sec. 391. of Cr.P.0 {28} instead

394

of giving baseless decisions".IN RE: the Law Commission of India -issue in their 154th

395

report (RRR) Law Teacher NOV. 06 2013

396

397

398

399

Crain v. United States:: 162 U.S. 625 (1896) :: Justia US Supreme

400

https://supreme.justia. corn/cases/federal/us/1 6216251

401

402

403

404

405

406

407

408

409

410

1. Cached

Crain v. United States, 162 U.S. 625 (1896) Page 162 U. S. 626. Page 162 U. S. 627.

Page 162 U. S. 628. Page 162 U.S. 629. Page 162 U. S. 630. Page 162 U. S. 631.

Page 162 U. S. 632. Page 162 U. S. 633.

United States v. Spearin Wikipedia

-

https://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/United_States v._ Spearin

411

412

413

414

415

416

417

418

1. Cached

2. Similar

United States v. Spearin, 248 U.S. 132 (1918), also referred to as the Spearin doctrine,

is a 1918 United States Supreme Court decision. It remains one of the landmark construction law cases.

.

United States v. Reynolds Wikipedia

-

419

420

421

422

https://en. w/kiped/a. org/wiki/United States_ v._Reynolds

423

424

425

426

427

428

429

430

1. Cached

2. Similar

United States v. Reynolds, 345 U.S. 1 (1953), is a landmark legal case in 1953 that

saw the Because of the failure of the government to produce the documents, a directed verdict in favor of the plaintiffs was granted by the trial court.

Majority: Vinson, joined by Reed, Douglas, Bur...

Prior history: Judgments entered in favor of the

Citations: 345 U.S. 1 (more)73 S. Ct. 528; 97

...

431

432

433

(B) Defendant S.St.Pierre is not a C.A.C. (child advocate center} Worker or a U.S.A. Judge

434

and should not hold the right/ or power over life or death.

435 (C)

436

The USA court system in every city, state , government dealings with law enforcement have

437

always given great emphasis on the belief that police officers will not give false statements

438

under oath; on the witness stand in open court; respectfully, this

439

(D)

440

(openly known legal respect} given by a judge to a police officer and legal helpers, to be

441

honest in open court on the witness stand under oath; should too be given to my case and a

442

(conman sense question should arise} WHY ? IS DEFEDANT SANDRA ST.PIERRE

443

BEING HAND PICKED BY A POLICE OFFICER ( Eion Stapleton) ON THE WITNESS

444

STAND under oath in open court 14-7-17 coos docket # 451-17-i 73} (on the court record}

445

to be the ( C.A.C.- child advocate center Officer) if in fact it is not true and a (legal fact} or

446

{ legal point} that defendant ( S.S. Pierre) did in fact help with the (#1) (legal physical

447

questioning) and not just the (#2) (reporting of the matter.) obvious to a duck that

448

ON 4-7-17 coos docket # 451-17-173 defendants S.S.Pierre was in fact picked out to be

449

something she is not and by a police officer.

450

(E) Do the court systems in AMERICA only believe (police testimonies}- (statements of

451

facts}, { Sworn Statements under oath} when it helps/ suits to put falsely, (AMERICAN

452

BORNS) IN PRISON or uphold death sentences- or is the law REALLY REAL and even

453

given to the poor for (fairness under law). Please help me...

454

A

455

CONCLUSION: Thus it is evident that the manner in which police investigations are

456

conducted is of critical importance to the functioning of the criminal justice system. Faulty

457

investigations put Americans in jail and clog up the legal system.

458

ON 4-7-17 coos docket # 451-17-173 defendant Sandra St. Pierre was handpicked out by

459

police officer Eion Stapleton of the Whitefield police, to be the legal C.A.C. Officer; but she

460

is not legally a C.A.C. (child advocate center) Officer, and her fake information and

461

impersonation of a city official help place me in jail and she should be liable. It is obvious to

462

a duck that defendant S.S. Pierre had more to do with the matter than{ just reporting the

463

matter} , per. {ON 4-7-17 coos docket # 451-17-173 defendant Sandra St. Pierre was

464

handpicked out by police officer Eion Stapleton of the Whitefield police to be more

465

involved with the matter than her lawyer lets on. The NH Supreme court refused to let me

466

use the court record of Coos County {ON 4-7-17 coos docket # 451-17-1731 to prove my

467

case.

468ç7\

469

\st

tr

tr

(The petition for a writ of certiorari should be granted because):

470 (A)

471

Respectfully, defendant Sandra St. Pierre was handpicked out by a police officer, under

472

oath on the witness stand ,in open court; to be the {REALJ legal police, professional (

473

C.A.C.) (Child advocacy center) helper that legally helped question the so-called victim over

474

days and days and days of legal questioning/BRIAN WASHING: that took place in different

475

locations

476

(B)

477

(With the so- called victim stating over and over on film she was outside playing with

478

everyone else for which town, bank, store video shows the kids outside playing)

479 (C)

480

And defendants without the legal knowledge or HELP of the (REAL POLI CE HELPERS

481

CA.c. PROFFIONALS); refused to use ALL the videos showing the ice skating park with the

482

kid in the video in the park with ALL the other kids

483

(D)

484

Just to obtain a warrantfor my arrest in (day light) in an (ALL WHITE TOWN).

485

(E)

486

MYFACEBOOK STALKER IS NOT immune to my complaint under RSA 507-B: 4-because

487

she is not a (C.A.C.) (Child Advocate Center) worker. Her School is now closed and the money

r)

488

i

is now

• 489

Going to the right places, she is no longer working as a school aid, the prosecutor is no longer

490

the coos county prosecutor, the police officer was moved to a different town 'my wife's mother

K

v C-