Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Stan J. Caterbone, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court briefOct 5, 2018
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
TO THE U.S. SUP EME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
1. 8
No.
FILED
CCI C 5 20i
IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE .UNITEDSTATES
STAN J. CATERBONE
PETITIONER
-.
(Your Name)
VS.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
RE$PONDENT(S)
-
ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
(NAME OF COURT THAT LAST RULED ON MERITS. OF YOUR CASE)
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTI.ORAR.
STAN J. CATERBONE
(Your Name)
1250 FREMONT STREET
(Address)
LANCASTER, PA 17603
(City, State, Zip Code)
717-327-1566
(Phone Number)
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. I of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP
ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
S
I
QUESTIONS PRESENTED
QUESTION NUMBER ONE: Did the United States of America err in not granting a
juris prudential exception. See 28 U.S.0 §§ 1291, 1292 in order to avoid having to
consider the following, which would necessarily obligate another set of Congressional
Hearings akin to the Church Hearings in 1973 whereby the CIA had to omit the
existence of MK-Ultra? Which it declared abandoned.
ANSWER TO QUESTION NUMBER ONE:
With regards to Estaban Santiago (Mass-Shooter at the Ft. Lauderdale Airport),
for which this AMICUS BRIEF was filed; and other Mass-Shooters that have made
similar claims of being victims of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control with a history of Military
Training Are their CONSITUTIONAL RIGHTS TO DUE PROCESS BEING COMPROMISED
and Should the following not be GRANTED?
-
VICTIMS OF U.S. SPONSORED MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES OPERATED BY
OPERATIVES, AGENCIES, AND OR IN DIRECT PARTNERSHIP WITH UNITED
STATES MILITARY, LAW ENFORCEMENT AND OR INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES OR
INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATIVE ARE ENSURED THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL
RIGHTS
ARE AFFORDED THE PROPER ADMINISTRATION OF LAW IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THIER ACTIONS, AND IF SUCH ACTIONS ARE DEEMED PROXY TO THEIR
HANDLERS, OR CONTROLERS, AND THEY ARE GRANTED THE PROPER
IMMUNITIVE DEFENSES DURING CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS BY UNITED STATES
ATTORNEYS, STATE ATTORNEYS, AND OR LOCAL MAGISTRATES.
THAT ANY AND ALL SUCH DIAGNOSIS OF MENTAL ILLNESSES ARE FIRST
DEEMED TO BE SYMPTOMATIC OF U.S. SPONSORED MIND CONTROL FIRST, AND
TREATMENTS ARE TO ENSURE THAT VICTIMS ARE PREPARED FOR A SAFE LIFE
AND ASSURED THEY ARE NOT A THREAT TO SOCIETY.
THAT LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES AND LOCAL POLICE ARE TO BE
ADVISED OF SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES AND ARE PROHIBITED FROM TARGETING
AND OR SURVEILLING THE VICTIMS IN ANY WAY.
THAT HEARING VOICES AND SUCH RELATED SYMPTOMS ARE NOT TO BE USED
FOR MENTAL HEALTH WARRANTS AND OR HOSPITALIZATIONS ALONE
WHITHOUT A THORUGH ANALYSIS OF THIER CLAIS OF SUFFERING SYMPTOMS
OF U.S. SPONSORED MIND CONTROL.
IN THE 1990'S THEN PRESIDENT WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON MADE PUBLIC
STATEMENTS AND APPOLOGIES FOR MILITARY/ INTELLEGENCE PROGRAMS
USING AMERICAN CITIZENS AS NON-CONSENSUAL EXPERIMENTEES. SUCH
PUBLIC DISCLOSURES, AT SOME POINT IN TIME, SHOULD BE ADDRESSED BY THE
CURRENT ADMINISTRATION OF VICTIMS OF U.S. SPONSORED MIND CONTROL.
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 4 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
. CATERBONE, his father
QUESTION NUMBER TW . Is PRO SE PETITIONER STA
Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., and his brother Samuel A. Caterbone VICTIMS OF U.S.
SPONSORED MIND CONTROL TECH NOLOGIXES who Suffered Incidents and Violations of
Civil, Constitutional Rights of Non-Consensual Experimentation paramount to
TORTURE?
ANSWER TO QUESTION NUMBER TWO: YES.
QUESTION NUMBER THREE Did PRO SE PETITIONER STAN 3. CATERBONE fall victim to
a CRIMINAL/CIVIL Conspiracy while engaging in Whistle-blowing Activities in the
ISC/CIA International Arms Dealer Scandal in 1987 which continues to today that now
has manifested into a cover-up and obstruction of justice case of mass proportions.
-
ANSWER TO QUESTION NUMBER THREE: YES.
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 5 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
LIST OF PARTIES
0
[X] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page.
[ ] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all
parties to the proceeding in the court whose judgment is the subject of this
petition is as follows:
LIST OF PLAINTIFF-APPELLANTS
1.
STAN J. CATERBONE
LIST OF RESPONDENTS
1. Noel J. Francisco
Counsel of Record
Solicitor General
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001
SupremeCtBriefs@USDOi.gov
202-514-2217
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No.6 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
1
THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-10134, by Stan J.Caterbone, Pro Se
T
0
E OF CONTENTS
MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LEGNTH ..............................................
PAGE No.
2
PROOF OF SERVICE ...................................................................
(3) QUESTIONS OF WRIT .............................................................
iisrOF PARTIES .......................................................................
6
OPINIONS BELOW .........................................
18
JURISDICTION.............................................................................
19
CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED
20
STATEMENT OF THE CASE ..............................................................
21
REASONS FOR GRANTING THE WRIT ...........................................
29
COCSLUSION..............................................................................
77
INDEX TO APPENDICES
APPENDIX A OPINIONS BELOW
APPENDIX B CATERBONE FAMILY AFFIDAVITS
APPENDIX C ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-10134 REPLY BRIEF TO
JURISDICTIONAL ORDER OF JANUARY 29, 2018 re FT. LAUDERDAL SHOOTER AMICUS
APPEAL February 3, 2018
-
-
-
-
-
APPLICATION FOR IN FORMA PAUPERIS
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No.7 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP
E COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
TA EOFAUTHORITIESC D
Page No.
CASES
351 F.3d 1348 (2003)
Robert S. WOLFF, Edward Turner, Edward E. Wailer, Grey Wolf
Holdings, John G. Coughlin,
Plaintiffs-Appel lees,
Vp
CASH 4 TITLES, d.b.a. Charles Richard Homa, et al., Defendants,
Phillip S. Stenger, G. James Cleaver, Cayman Islands Liquidations
Creditors' Committee,
Appellants.
No. 01-16973.
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
Filed December 5, 2003.
STATUETES AND RULES
1. AMICUS CASE LAW
A person with strong interest reviews on the subject matter of an action may petition
the court for permission to file brief, ostensibly on behalf of a party but actually to
suggest a rational consistent with its own views. BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY 75 (5th
ed. 1979) News & Sun-Sentinel Co. v. Cox, 700 F. Supp. 30, 31 (S.D.Fla. 1988)
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure lack of parallel provision for regulating amicus
appearances at the district level. District courts have inherent authority to appoint or
deny amici which is derived from Rule 29 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
See Mobile Cnty. Water, Sewer & Fire Prot. Auth, Inc. v. Mobile Area Water & Sewer
Sys., Inc. 576 F. Supp. 2D 1342, 1344 (s.D. Ala. 2008). "Inasmuch as an amicus is not
a party 'and does not represent the parties but participates only for the benefit of the
court is solely within the discretion of court to determine the fact, extent, and manner
of participation by the amicus." Cox, 700 F Supp. At 31 (citation omitted). The decision
whether to allow non-party to participate as an amicus is solely within the broad
discretion of the Court. Resort Timeshare Resales Inc. v. Stuart 764 F.Supp 1495, 1500
(S.D.Fla.1991); Ellsworth Associates Inc. v. United States 917 F. Supp. 841, 846
(D.D.C.1996).
This case is a pending criminal trial. As such it is noteworthy that there are specific
constitutional protections that exist in criminal cases that do not otherwise apply to
parties and civil actions. See United States v. Ward 448 U.S. 242 248 (1980).
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 8 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
.
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
PRO SE & IN FORMA PAUPERIS
Commonwealth v. Haggentstaller, 699 A. 2d 767 (Pa Superior, 1997), Pro Se Appellant
sought review of Conviction for violation of County for violation of County ordinance with
Rule of Appellant Procedure, court conducted a "thorough, independent review of the
record", and found sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction.
Hempfield Township v. Hapchuck 153 Pa. Comwlth. 173620 A. 2d. 668 (1993) Pro Se Brief
failed to comply with Pa. Rules of Appellate Procedure, but the failure to comply did not
substantially impede the Courts ability to review the issues presented and therefore
considered the merits of the case.
Pa. R. App. P. Rule 552, 561 Indigent § 16.2 In Forma Pauperis, Griffen v. Illinois, 351 U.S.
12, 76 S. Ct. 585, 100 L. Ed. 891 (1956) states Indigent has right to free Trial Transcript for
Appeal of Right.
In Pederson v. South Williamsport Area School District, the courts interpreted due process,
as "Essentially fundamental fairness is exactly what due process means". Furthermore, the
United States District Courts in Perry v. Coyler (1978, 524 F 2d. 644) have concluded the
"Even the probability of unfairness can result in a defendant being deprived
following:
of his due process rights.".
The first issue to address is that of the Plaintiff's right to due process, as prescribed by law.
In Pederson v. South Williamsport Area School District, the courts interpreted due process,
as "Essentially fundamental fairness is exactly what due process means". Furthermore, the
United States District Courts in Perry v. Coyler (1978, 524 F 2d. 644) have concluded the
following: "Even the probability of unfairness can result in a defendant being deprived of his
due process rights...".
CIVIL RIGHTS
§1983 Civil Rights Acts and 18 U.S.C.A. Acts state the following: "The underlying purpose of
the scheme of protecting constitutional rights are to permit victims of constitutional
violations to obtain redress, to provide for federal prosecution of serious constitutional
violations when state criminal proceedings are ineffective for purpose of deterring violations
and to strike a balance between protection of individual rights from state infringement and
protection from state and local government from federal interference", 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 241,
242; U.S.C.A.
-
Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5, 15, § 2: 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1981-1982, 1985,
1988, Fed. Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A.
In Ascolese v. Southeastern Turnpike Authority, C 925 F. supp. 351, the case supports the
notion that "One of the principal purposes of § 1983 was to give remedy to parties deprived
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No.9 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
of Constitutional Rights,
ileges, and immunities by Officia
buse of his or her position,
that is to provide remedy against individual officials who violate Constitutional Rights, 42
U.S.C.A. § 1983.
4. CIVIL CONSPIRACY
Rico §263 42 § 1985 (2) Persons Involved In Litigation To Be Free From Conspiracy
In the case of United States v. Hoick, 389 F. Supp. 2d. 338, criminal responsibility defines
single or multiple conspiracies by the following: "Governments, without committing
variance between single conspiracy charges in an indictment and it's proof at trial may
establish existence at continuing core conspiracy which attracts different members at
different times and which involves different subgroups committing acts in furtherance of an
overall plan". This illustrates the legal analysis of the 1987 conspiracy to cover-up my
International Signal & Control, Plc., whistle blowing activities.
Under Pennsylvania Law, conspiracy may be proved by circumstantial evidence that is by
acts and circumstances sufficient to warrant an inference that the unlawful combination has
been in front of facts formed for the purpose charged. See Walcker v. North Wales Boro,
395 F. Supp. 2d. 219. In the same case the following was supported: "Arrestee's allegations
that the township (Conestoga) and it's police officers were acting in concert and conspiracy
and with the purpose of violating arrestee's constitutional rights by subjecting him to
unreasonable force, arrest, search, and malicious prosecution and the two (2) or more
officers acted together in throwing arrestee to the ground (April 5th, 2006 and August 4th1
2006) and forcing him to take two (2) blood tests and holding him in custody". The
preceding pleaded civil conspiracy claims under Pennsylvania Law.
In order to state a claim for civil conspiracy and a cause of action under Pennsylvania Law, a
plaintiff must allege that two (2) or more persons agree or combine with lawful intent to do
an unlawful act or to do an otherwise lawful act by unlawful means, with proof of malice
with intent to injure the person, his/her property and or business. In the case of United
States v. Hoick, 389 F. Supp. 2d. 338, criminal responsibility defines single or multiple
conspiracies by the following: "Governments, without committing variance between single
conspiracy charges in an indictment and it's proof at trial may establish existence at
continuing core conspiracy which attracts different members at different times and which
involves different subgroups committing acts in furtherance of an overall plan".
§1983 Civil Rights Acts and 18 U.S.C.A. Acts state the following: "The underlying purpose of
the scheme of protecting constitutional rights are to permit victims of constitutional
violations to obtain redress, to provide for federal prosecution of serious constitutional
violations when state criminal proceedings are ineffective for purpose of deterring violations
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 10 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
and to strike a balance
een protection of individual righ
rom state infringement and
protection from state and local government from federal interference", 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 241,
242; U.S.C.A.
-
Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5, 15, § 2: 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1981-1982, 1985,
1988, Fed. Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A.
ANIT-TRUST
The Following violations constitute a legitimate Anti-Trust violation under Title 15 of the
Federal Statutes. In private Anti-Trust actions, Plaintiff, in addition to proving violations and
an injury, must also show that a violation and an injury must also prove that the violation
was direct and material to the cause of injury suffered; however, the Plaintiff's burden in
causations issues is not as heavy as the Plaintiff only needs to show a casual relation with
reasonable probability to a fair degree of certainty (Anderson Foreign Motors, Inc. v. New
England Toyota Distributors, Inc., D.C. Mass 1979, 475. Supp.).
RICO
• The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (commonly referred to as RICO) is
a United States federal law which provides for extended penalties for criminal acts
performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization. RICO was enacted by section
901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, Pub. L. No. 91-452, 84 Stat. 922 (Oct.
15, 1970). RICO is codified as Chapter 96 of Title 18 of the United States Code, 18 U.S.C.
§ 1961 through 18 U.S.C. § 1968.
• It has been speculated that the name and acronym were selected in a sly reference to the
movie Little Caesar, which featured a notorious gangster named "Rico." The original drafter
of the bill, G. Robert Blakey, has refused to confirm or deny this.[1]
Summary
Under RICO, a person or group who commits any two of 35 crimes-27 federal crimes and 8
state crimes—within a 10-year period and, in the opinion of the US Attorney bringing the case,
has committed those crimes with similar purpose or results can be charged with racketeering.
Those found guilty of racketeering can be fined up to $25,000 and/or sentenced to 20 years in
prison. In addition, the racketeer must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business
gained through a pattern of "racketeering activity." The act also contains a civil component that
allows plaintiffs to sue for triple damages. When the U.S. Attorney decides to indict someone
under RICO, he has the option of seeking a pre-trial restraining order or injunction to prevent
the transfer of potentially forfeitable property, as well as require the defendant to put up a
performance bond. This provision is intended to force a defendant to plead guilty before
indictment. There is also a provision for private parties to sue. A "person damaged in his
business or property" can sue one or more "racketeers." There must also be an "enterprise.'
The defendant(s) are not the enterprise, in other words, the defendant(s) and the enterprise
are not one and the same. There must be one of four specified relationships between the
defendant(s) and the enterprise. This lawsuit, like all Federal civil lawsuits, can take place in
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 11 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
either Federal or State courtp://www.dealer-magazine.com,ex.asp?article481
7. § 3729. False claims
FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS ACT
The Federal False Claims Act
TITLE 31. MONEY AND FINANCE
SUBTITLE III. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
CHAPTER 37. CLAIMS
SUBCHAPTER III. CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
31 USCS § 3729-33
§ 3729. False claims
§ 3730. Civil actions for false claims
§ 3731. False claims procedure
§ 3732. False claims jurisdiction
§ 3733. Civil investigative demands
§ 3729. False claims
S. CASE LAW FOR TORTURE AND JURISDICTION FOR COMPENSATORY
DAMAGES AND REMEDIES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO. 07-21783-CIV-JORDAN
TEOFILA OCHOA LIZARBE, in her individual capacity, and in her capacity as the personal
representative of the estates of Silvestra Lizarbe Soils, Gerardo Ochoa Lizarbe, Victor Ochoa
Lizarbe, Ernestina Ochoa Lizarbe, Celestino Ochoa Lizarbe, and Edwin Ochoa Lizarbe,
and
CIRILA PULIDO BALDEÔN, in her individual capacity, and in her capacity as the personal
representative of the estates of Fortunata Baldeón Gutiérrez and Edgar Pulido Baldeón,
Plaintiffs,
V.
TELMO RICARDO HURTADO HURTADO, Defendant.
THE RIGHT TO SUE FOR TORTURE
Case 1:07-cv-21783-A) Document 32 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/29/2008 Page 6 of 31
7need "to conduct and adhere to a strict choice of law analysis." Id. at 422-23. In sum, the
Tachiona court held that both federal law and international law apply to ATS and TVPA claims.
The Ninth Circuit also conducted an examination of the applicable choice-of-law for damages in
ATS cases, in Alvarez-Machain v. United States 331 F.3d 604, (9th Cir. 2003) rev'd on other
grounds, Sosa v. Alvarez-Macham, 542 U.S. 692 (2004). After finding that federal common law
applies to the choice-of-law determination, the court held that it should first look to the
Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws, which states that choice of law principles in tort law
are governed by the "most significant relationship" test. Id. at 633-34. (citing Section 145
Restatement §6). In order to determine what law has the most significant relationship to the
tort, the Restatement looks to the following factors:
the injury occurred; (c)
(a) the place where the injury occurred; (b) the place where the conduct causing
between the parties is centered. Id. At 634.
the domicile, residence, nationali the relationship, if any,
policy factors that should be considered in ATS cases.
The court then articulated competing
These factors included:
"(a) the needs of the interstate and international systems, (b) the relevant policies of the forum, (c) the
relevant policies of other interested states and the relative interests of those states in the determination of
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 12 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
ection of justified expectations, (e)ls basic policies underlying the
the particular issue, (d) the
particular field of law, (f) certainty, predictability and uniformity of result, and (g) ease in the
determination and application of the law to be applied." Id. at 634 (citing Section 145 Restatement §6(2)).
The Alvarez-Machain court held that the totality of the factors, including the "policy of the
United States, as expressed in the ATCA, to provide a remedy for violations of the law of
nations," weighed in favor of applying United States law. Id. Case 1:07-cv-21783-A) Document
32 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/29/2008 Page 7 of 31 8 The federal common law analysis
articulated in these precedents favors the underlying trumped by federal law where the
applicable law is inconsistent with federal common law. As a practical matter, this means that
federal courts typically apply federal common law to damages under the ATS. Here, under
Eleventh Circuit precedent, federal common law would apply to the determination of damages
under the ATS. Under the analysis articulated by the Tachiona court, the law of nations and
federal common law would apply to the damages inquiry under the ATS. Tachiona at 419-20.
Under the Alvarez-Machain standard, the "most significant relationship" test favors the
application of Peruvian law, but the relevant polic considerations articulated in the
decision favor the application of federal common law. The totality of the case law, thus, weighs
in favor of applying federal common law to the determination of damages under the ATS. This
Court should award Plaintiffs damages under federal common law for their ATS and TVPA
claims.
9. JURISDICTION FOR COMPENSATORY DAMAGES AND REMEDIES
Federal Common Law on Damages
Once it has been determined that federal common law applies to the question of damages, it
becomes necessary to determine how to ascertain what the federal common law of damages is,
as it relates to damages under the ATS and the TVPA. In order to determine or to fashion
federal common law remedies, "courts may be guided by appropriate statutes without adopting
any in their entirety." See Park v. Korean Air Lines Co., 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16841, 20
(S.D.N.Y. 1992) (citing Moragne v. State Marine Lines, Inc., 398 U.S. 375, 406-408 (1970); 3
This is true under both the ATS, which is simply a jurisdictional grant of that enables plaintiffs
to bring claims for violations of established international law, and under the TVPA, which
creates a specific cause of action for claims of torture and extrajudicial killing. In each case,
absent the federal statute, plaintiffs would have no ability to sue in federal court. 4 The
application of federal common law to damages under ATS and TVPA cases is also supported by
legal commentators. International Human Rights Litig. in U.S. Courts states that in ATS
litigation "[t]he remedy however, is a 'purely domestic tort remedy' governed by 'traditional,
well-established concepts of federal common law." Beth Stephens, International Human Rights
Litigation in U.S. Courts (Brill Publishers 2008), citing William R. Casto, The New Federal
Common Law of Tort Remedies for Violations of International Law, 37 Rutgers L.J. 635, 641
(2006). Wright & Miller states that courts should look to a wide variety of sources, including
"considerations of what rule is best designed to implement the underlying federal policy or
statute involved [and] general considerations of equity jurisprudence." Wright & Miller, Federal
Practice & Procedure § 4518. Although some courts conceptualize this broad inquiry as a choice
of law analysis, they only follow choice of law principles to the extent those principles are
consistent with the federal common law policy objective enforcing the intent of the ATS. Most
federal court decisions that perform any choice of law analysis do so in the context of an inquiry
over other aspects of ATS law, rather than damages. See e.g. In re Estate of Ferdinand Marcos
Human Rights Litigation (Hilao v. Marcos) 25 F.3d 1467, 1475 (9th Cir. 1994), cert. denied 513
U.S. 1126 (1995) (abatement); Estate of Cabello v. Fernandez-Larios, 157 F.Supp.2d 1345 (S.D.
Fl. 2001 (standing). Many of these courts, although notably not the Eleventh Circuit, cite to the
Restatement 2nd of Conflicts or refer to more traditional choice of law principles drawn from
United States Supreme Court holdings such as Lauritzen v. Larsen 345 U.S. 571 (1953). See e.g.
Tachiona at 420 (reviewing pre-2002 case law on choice of law issues). One outlier court based
the choice of law analysis on the law of the U.S. state in which the federal court sits.
Presbyterian Church of Sudan v. Talisman Energy Inc., 453 F.Supp.2d 633 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)
(appeal pending). But federal courts have consistently refused to be shackled by any
conventional choice of law principles in ATS cases and if they conduct a choice of law
analysis at all, they do so only within the larger context of the federal common law
-
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 13 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-1 0134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
egal principles. See e.g.
reference to a broad range fl
inquiry, which itself allo
Filartiga IL Many courts simply collapse the choice of law analysis into the federal
common law analysis of the appropriate source of law, as the District Court did in
assessment of ATS damages
Filartiga II. Most courts facing the issue in this case
after a default —skip a choice of law analysis altogether and instead rely on previously
decided ATS cases that awarded compensatory and punitive damages. See e.g. Paul v.
Avril, 901 F.Supp. 330 (S.D. Fla. 1994).
-
10. What is the Remedy for American Torture?
By Fionnuala Ni Aoláin
Asst. Sec. of State for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, Tom Malinowski stated to the UN
Committee on Torture two weeks ago that:
A little more than ten years ago, our government was employing interrogation
methods that, as President Obama has said, any fair-minded person would believe
were torture. At the same time, the test for any nation committed to this Convention
and to the rule of law is not whether it ever makes mistakes, but whether and how it
corrects them.
But what does correction look like? What obligations of repair follow from the
acknowledgement that torture was routinely and consistently practiced by the United States? It
is very clear that the Convention Against Torture (Article 14) as well as the collective
jurisprudence of regional and international courts require that reparations follow from harm
committed in breach of human rights treaty obligations. At the same hearings, Acting Legal
Advisor to the State Department, Mary McLeod claimed that the United States "has taken
important steps to ensure adherence to its legal obligations." These include the creation and
enforcement of laws and processes "to strengthen the safeguards against torture and cruel
treatment" including Executive Order 13491. We are told that Army Field Manual Rules on
Interrogation are now being fully enforced, and that there is great transparency in interrogation
procedures, though with some ambiguity whether these procedures apply outside the territory
of the United States. There is one resounding silence. In the context of torture committed at
Guantanamo Bay and in other detention sites across the world not one word emerged from the
delegation on what direct and specific obligations of reparation were owed to those persons
who experienced torture at the hands of agents of the United States. This gap was directly
addressed by Jens Modvig, the Country Rapporteur who asked the delegation to clarify:
how many victims of torture have legally pursued and successfully obtained
effective remedy for torture during U.S. custody within and outside U.S. territory?
In parallel, the US position on prosecution maintains a curious silence on the salience of
accountability for torture post 9/11, though prosecutions in other contexts against
international recognized torturers is touted as evidence of a commitment to broadly based
accountability. In the midst of this resounding silence, my comments focus on what the
Committee can and should expect of the United States with respect to reparations for
Guantanamo Bay detainees and others ill-treated in black sites.
A starting point to addressing why the United States has an obligation of reparations is to recall
why remedies exist for human rights violations under international treaty law. Reparations
exist because they provide a concrete means to show a desire for non-repetition, to give
redress to persons who have been harmed and to individually confirm meaningful
condemnation in the aftermath of grievous harm to a human being. Recall that the IC) has !ieJ
that "the power to afford reparations is implicit in jurisdiction to hear a case, as a necessary
concomitant to deciding disputes." Simply put, reparations are necessary to repair the legal
injury.
The practice of regional human rights bodies gives us useful insights into what might be
expected of the United States for violation of the CAT. It is fair to say that the European Court of
Human Rights (ECtHR) has historically taken a more conservative approach to the provision of
remedies. The form of remedies for torture has generally followed the model of direct financial
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 14 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
t of lawyers' fees and the
who has been harmed, the pay
compensation to the indivi
admonition not to breach again. More recently however, the Court is adopting a broader
approach to remedies and now proactively indicates the measure a violating state should take
to prevent torture recurring. So for example, in early cases like Soering v. United Kingdom
(1989)—involving breach of the torture prohibition in a decision to extradite a German national
facing the death penalty to the United States—neither pecuniary nor non-pecuniary damages
were awarded to the victim. However costs and expenses of £26,782.80 were sustained. In
later cases such as Ribitsch v. Austria (1991)—involving ill-treatment in Federal Police
Authority custody in Vienna—the ECtHR specifically requested that similar violations do not
occur in the future. In the past two decades a robust application of non-pecuniary damages
both to applicants and their families can be observed in torture cases such asKurt v. Turkey
(1998). Here non-pecuniary damages of £15,000 were awarded to the applicant's son and
£10,000 to the applicant; in Selmouni v. France (1999) 500,000 FRF were awarded in nonpecuniary damages for torture in police custody; and in Taz v. Turkey (2000) £20,000 were
awarded in non-pecuniary damages following the enforced disappearance of the applicant's son
and £10,000 in respect of the applicant for torture in the context of disappearance. Recently, in
the context of rendition cases from Poland (here), the Court has confirmed that Poland not only
had to pay direct compensation to those rendered but the government was required to take
proactive institutional action to protect them.
The emerging scope of an expansive remedies approach for systematic violations of nonderogable rights is trenchantly illustrated by a series of cases in which the United Kingdom was
found in violation of another non-derogable Convention right—the right to life (Article 2).
Spanning almost two decades, these cases included deaths resulting from the exercise of force
against members of paramilitary organizations (e.g. McCann v. United Kingdom (1995), Jordan
v. United Kingdom (2001), McKerr and Others v United Kingdom (2001), and McCaughey and
Grew v. United Kingdom (2013) and the Court determined that a range of institutional
measures had to be taken in order to provide "Just Satisfaction" to those killed and their
families. These measures include positive and procedural obligations for the state and its
agents that addressed planning, training, oversight, investigation, prosecution and civil
remedies. The obvious precursor to these institutional remedies was individual compensation to
all those whose families members were killed by the use of force violating the right to life
provisions of the Convention. The UK precedent and specifically the broad "package of
measures" agreed by the Council of Europe to firmly address and remedy violations of the right
to life occurring during the conflict in Northern Ireland provides one useful model to
conceptualize what US reparations for torture practices post 9/11 might look like in practice.
The Inter-American Court (IACHR) has been exceedingly robust in its provision of reparations
for torture, both with respect to the ability to order compensation and force other remedial
measures. In Aloeboetoe et al. v. Suriname (1990) where multiple violations including violation
of the right to humane treatment were sustained, the Court ordered collective reparations for a
wide range of family and village members including individual payments to multiple families.
The Court ordered the creation of two trust funds and the establishment of a foundation for the
entire harmed community. Justices stipulated that this financial instrument should not be
subject to national taxation rules. The Court ordered the state, as an act of reparation, to
reopen the school located in the area where the harms took place with an obligation to staff it
with teaching and administrative personnel.
It is important to be aware that the IACHR has adjudicated cases in which the individuals
tortured have been alleged (by the state) to be members of paramilitary/non-state
organizations. In these torture cases the Court has been reliably clear that the imputed political
status of those subject to exceptional detention regimes is not a basis to justify torture.
Remedies in these cases show that the state does not get deferential treatment simply because
of the (alleged) context in which the harms occurred whether a situation of armed conflict or
terrorism. Thus, for example, in Loayza Tamayo v. Peru (1998) the victim was an alleged
collaborator of the subversive group "Shining Path." She was detained for ten days and
subjected to torture, cruel and degrading treatment. The reparations required by the Court
included:
• A sum equivalent to the salaries that the victim ceased to receive between the time she
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 15 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUPREME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
0
was detained and the
e of the decision by the Court.
• A lump sum for the victim's medical expenses during her incarceration.
• A sum corresponding to the travel expenses incurred by the next of kin to visit the victim
while she was held in detention.
• An amount corresponding to the likely future medical expenses of the victim and her
children.
As for compensatory damages Peru was ordered to pay a total of US$167,190.30 for the victim:
$20,000 for the victim's parents; $30,000 for the victim's children; $18,000 for the victim's
brothers. Importantly, and relevant as comparison practice in relation to "correction" for
torture practices were the institutional reform and measures required to prevent recurrence of
violence by the IACHR. Peru was required to adopt all internal legal measures necessary to
adapt Decree Laws 25,475 (Crime of Terrorism) and 25,659 (Crime of Treason) to conform to
the ACHR. Peru was mandated to investigate the facts in the applicants' case, and "identify and
punish those responsible for those acts, and adopt all the necessary domestic legal measures to
ensure that this obligation is discharged." The Justices also required the State to take all
measures necessary to re-instate Ms. Loayza-Tamayo in the teaching service of the University
from which she had been fired. This reinstatement was also based on the understanding that
the amount of her salaries and other benefits would be equal to the pay she was receiving for
the teaching at the time she was detained, with appreciation to the date of the date of the
IACHR's decision. Down to the specifics, Peru was required to guarantee Loayza-Tamayo her
full retirement benefits, including those owed for the period that followed her detention.
Another relevant case as we survey the international jurisprudence for torture is that of
Cantoral Benavides Case v. Peru (2001). This case is valuable because the remedies given
reflect the Court's understanding of the long term medical needs of the Luis Alberto Cantoral
Benavides following torture experienced in custody. Cantoral Benavides was a 20 year-old
University biology student when he was arrested. He was detained for four years and after
release he experienced ongoing physical and psychiatric complaints. Reparations to Cantoral
Benavides included US $24,000 which was calculated to compensate the salary he would have
received if not imprisoned. For medical treatment received in custody he was awarded US
$1,000 and for future medical treatment the Court allocated US $10.000. In a distinctly
egalitarian move, appreciating the parallel harms that are experienced by the families of those
tortured, the Court found that Cantoral Benavides' mother suffered and still evidenced
symptoms physical and psychological pain originating from the imprisonment and situation of
her son. In this instance of extended reparation the Court ordered Peru to pay US $1,500 for
medical treatment. A parallel sum was also awarded to Cantoral Benavides' brother for medical
and psychological aid. Moral damages were paid to the primary victim, his mother, and his three
brothers ($125,000).
In terms of institutional reparation the state was ordered to annul any domestic criminal,
administrative or judicial records against the victim. Notably the Court ordered that the merits
judgment of the Court be published in a national legal journal. The state was required to make
public amends to the victim including providing a scholarship for graduate studies with a
monthly fee for living expenses. All medical costs for the victim's mother were to be paid by the
state.
These IACHR cases are illustrative of a broader trend to "transformative" reparations where
serious human rights have been engaged by the state. Increasingly, it is simply insufficient to
compensate the victim financially when non-derogable human rights are violated (though that
is an essential first step of repair). Rather, regional human courts have recognized that the
imprint of the harm of torture is life-long, life-changing, and effects the lives of families as well
as of the persons whose bodies and integrity have been violated. In this context, the response
of the United States to the probing of the UN Committee on remedies seems woefully
inadequate. While having provided the Committee with the names of 33 individuals who had
filed claims against the Department of Defense, no substantive information was provided on the
status of those cases. Despite questions asked by the Committee, the US delegation neatly
avoided giving information on whether any of those individual had been provided non-judicial
remedies, and on the numbers of lawsuits involving torture or serious ill-treatment that had
failed to proceed on the basis of non-exhaustion of the internal grievance system. Despite the
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 16 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case o. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
torney General, there is no
Robin Jacobson, Associate Deput
apparent formal assurances
evidence that the United States has taken responsibility to implement remedies for
acknowledged torture. He stated:
U.S. law provides a wide range of civil remedies for seeking redress in cases of
torture. These include injunctions, compensatory damages, punitive damages, and
declaratory relief. In addition, the U.S. Congress has authorized the federal
government to bring civil actions to enjoin acts or patterns of conduct that violate
constitutional rights, including those that
would amount to torture. At the federal level, the principal avenues of individual
redress are administrative tort claims and civil litigation.
Common law tort actions for assault, battery, wrongful death, civil actions for
violations of federally protected civil rights, suits based on federal constitutional
rights. On the state level, all of our states provide for civil tort suits to be brought
against state officials and many permit damages for violations of state constitutional
rights.
This formal litany of effectively unavailable rights to tortured Guantanamo Bay detainees and
others operates as a secondary layer of Convention violation. Namely, the violation of the right
to an effective remedy for torture. Words in fact, may be cheap. As Gabor Rona has noted here,
there is little new about the acknowledgement of extraterritoriality official by this US
delegation, despite the hype. Harold Koh among other commentators here, has applauded the
honesty and increased transparency of the acknowledgments made before the Committee (a
cheer for the "unequivocal yes"). On that matter, I am less persuaded. There is a grave danger
that acknowledgment may blur the ongoing, daily violations of detainees' human rights. It may
also cloud and allow us to forget that there are a host of other obligations that follow from
naming the fact that torture has taken place. Lest we forget, the United States has a direct
obligation to each individual tortured and subject to cruel treatment at Guantanamo Bay, and
that obligation is one of repair, remedy and restitution.
11. JUSTICE FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE AND TERRORISM ACT
[House Report 110-844] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
110th Congress Report HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 110-844
September 15, 2008.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on State of the Union
and ordered to be printed Mr. Conyers, from the Committee on the Judiciary, submitted the
following R E P 0 R T [To accompany H.R. 5167] [Including cost estimate of the Congressional
Budget Office] The Committee on the Judiciary, to whom was referred the bill (H.R. 5167) to
amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 to remove the authority of
the President to waive certain provisions, having considered the same, reports favorably
thereon with amendments and recommends that the bill as amended do pass.
OTHER
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 17 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP
E COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case o. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF'TEIE tJiD1TE
PETiTION FOI WT :O:F QERTFQRARI
below.
PeItoner respectuliyprays:that, a iit:df jtioriireto :\iv
OPINIONS BELOW
mfederaicourts!
The opinion QheLInited Staes c,urt f app:eais ;apparat Appendix;._A.
the petition wand is
N report at, ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
[ ] has been designated for pubhatiofi but is not yet reported, or,
[ ] is unpublislted
Thei.n1orr of theOrjte:d a•ts stt court, : pas;t Apperi'dix,_A
the petition and is
th
DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN FLORIDA
:reported:a._U.S.
[ ] has Won,,designated for publication but is not yet reported, or,
[ } is unpubhshed
r
Vor cases fro, m sourts:
The opinion of the hghet.ate ourt to :review the mer!t appears at
o the p,etition and;is
App:endix
te~ported at,
I I ;ha been. d ign•afed r
[1 is unpublished
titTQr. bP, 1$ ht;yereprte4;:. or;,
qpid
tppears Bt Appendix
] repoited at
I. ] ;has been. dé
II Ii's unpubhhed
.
-
-- to theipeeteionawd is
or
ed. Thi p1itiO1-i but i rtOt ye reportecQ;,
1.
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 18 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
.
TO THE U.S. SUPREME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
0
JuRisalciloN
Fr cases from fderal courts
The date or Winch the United states Court of Appeals 'decided my case
was September 21, 2018
:U No petition for rehearing was ti!melI flid. in ity
[1 A timely petition for rehearing wa8 denThd by he United States Co-t of
Appeals on the following date September 21,'26-i8
, and a copy of the
order denying rehearing appears at Appe.ncUx A
[ j .Axf extensioh:,oftime to file the petition for a wit OfCertiorari was granted,
to and including
in Application No, _A
(date) on
(date)
The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked tinder 28 U. S. C. fl24(1).
[ j For cases from state courts
The date on which the higbest 'state, court decided my case was
copy of that decision appears at Appendix
] A. timeIpetition i)r rehearing was thereafter denied on The ftllbw1ng cIat;
and a topy of the order denying rehearing
appears at Appendix
11 An exteftsiOr of time to .file the Petition- for 'a writ of ertirari wasgrantea
to and including
(date) on
(date) in
Application Na — A,
The ju...Idietionofthis COwIt;is ii: .vOked.. under 28 U S C '* 1257(a).
.
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 19 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP
E COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case o. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISON.S INVOLVED
Amendment V (5): Rights in criminal cases
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment
or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia,
when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same
offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb, nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a
witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.
Amendment VI (6): Rights to a fair trial
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial,
by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed;
which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature
and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process
for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defence.
Amendment VII (7): Rights in civil cases
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars,
the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise re-examined
in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Amendment VIII (8): Bails, fines, and punishments
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 20 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP
E COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case o. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
TATEMENT OF THE CAS
As of today there have been 307 mass shootings in 313 days in the United States of
America of 4 or more persons; ALMOST ONE PER DAY. I have filed AMICUS Briefs for two
(2) of the mass shooters and have an AMICUS pending for the Washington State Bomber
that sent bombs in packages to military installations in and around Washington, D.C.. I
have had a scheduled conference call with the legal firm representing families of the Las
Vegas Mass Shooting after they reviewed a few of my documents. There are at least 3
Mass Shooters that have died, where AMICUS briefs would have been mute. The AMICUS
briefs that I do file are done after research and analysis reveals the common denominators
of persons like myself that make claims of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control Technologies. I
have witnessed these traits since I was about five or six years old in my father, then with
my brother until I became a victim. ARE YOU PEOPLE CERTAIN YOU ARE MAKING THE
RIGHT DECISIONS TO KEEP THIS COUNTRY SAFE? ARE YOU ABLE TO LOOK INTO THE EYES
OF THE CRYING FATHERS, MOTHERS, FREIENDS AND RELATIVES OF THOSE MURDERED IN
THESE MASS SHOOTINGS WITH THE UTMOST CONFIDENCE IN YOUR DECICIONS
REGARDING MY CASES?
On December 4, 2017 in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida before the
Honorable Judge Beth Bloom, Case No. 17-60022-Crim-BLOOM PRO SE PETITIONER STAN J.
CATERBONE'S APPLICATION FOR AMICI CURIAE BRIEF WAS DENIED. Judge Bloom wrote:
"THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon a sua sponte review of the record.' On December 1,
2017, Stanley J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group ("Amici Curiae") filed documents pro se
with the Court styled as an "Application for Amici Curiae Brief." ("Applications"). ECF Nos. [76]
and [77]. The stated purpose of the. Applications are that it was filed "in support of Estaban [sic]
Santiago Ruiz [sic] Defense." Id. As part of the Application submission, Amici Curiae submitted a
DVD because "[t]printing of the DVD materials are of the utmost importance to this Amicus Brief
and it would be cost prohibitive to print in paper format." Id.
The Court has carefully reviewed all the information submitted by Amici Curiae, including the
electronic information contained on the DVD. and finds as follows:
"Amicus' curiae "means "friend of the court." A person with strong interest or views on the
subject matter of an action may actually petition the court for permission to file a brief,
ostensibly on behalf of a party but to suggest a rationale consistent with its own views. BLACK'S
LAW DICTIONARY 75 (5th ed. 1979). News & Sun-Sentinel Co. v. Cox, 700 F. Supp, 30, 31 (S.D.
Fla; 1988).
1 The 'rule is well established that a corporation is an artificial entity that can act only through
agents, cannot appear pro se, and must be represented by counsel. Commercial and Railroad Bank
of Vicksburg v. Slocomb, 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 60, IOL.Ed. 354 (1840). As the Court is denying the
Application on the merits, it declines to consider the. implications of this prohibition here.
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 21 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case o. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
of amicus curiae briefs, the
ellate Procedure 29 provides for the
While Federal "Rule of
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure lack a parallel provision regulating amicus appearances at the
district court level. "District courts have inherent authority to appoint or deny amid which is
derived from Rule 29 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure." See Mobile Cnty. Water, Sewer
& Fire Prot. Auth., Inc. v. Mobile Area Water & Sewer Sys., Inc., 567 F. Supp. 2d 1342, 1344 (S.D.
Ala. 2008). "Inasmuch as an amicus is not a party and 'does not represent the parties but
participates only for the benefit of the court, it is solely within the discretion of the court to
determine the fact, extent. and manner of participation by the amicus." Cox, 700 F .Supp. at 31.
(citation omitted). The decision whether to allow a non-party to participate as an amicus curiae is
solely within the broad discretion of the Court. Resort Timeshare Resales, Inc. v. Stuart, 764
F.Supp. 149$, 1500 (S.D.Fla.1991); Ellsworth Assocs., Inc. v. United States. 917 F.Supp. 841, 846
(D.D.C.1996).
To be sure, the instant case is of public importance. However, this case-is a pending criminal
trial.2 As such. it is noteworthy that there are specific constitutional protections that exist in
criminal cases that do not otherwise apply to parties in civil actions. See United States v. Ward,
448 U.S. 242, 248 (1980). Moreover, Mr. Santiago-Ruiz is represented by "learned counsel" as
required by 18 U.S.C. §3005; as well as three other qualified and experienced attorneys from
the Federal Defender's Office. There has been no suggestion or reason to believe that appointed
counsel cannot or will not adequately represent Mr. Santiago-Ruiz. There is no indication that
counsel requested or encouraged assistance from the Amici Curiae.
2 It is rare for amicus curiae briefs to be filed in criminal cases even at the appellate level, "Over
the five years from 2003-2007, only 12 amicus curiae briefs were filed in criminal cases." P.
Stephen Gidiere III, The Facts and Fictions of Amicus Curiae Practice in the Eleventh Circuit
Court of Appeals, 5 SETON HALL CIRCUIT rev. 1, 18 (4008)."
Further, the Court does not find the participation of Amici Curiae would be desirable or
beneficial to these proceedings. Courts typically grant amicus status where the party
"contribute[s] to the court's understanding of the matter in question" by proffering timely
and useful information. Conservancy of Southwest Florida v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Serv.,
No.2: 10- cv-106, 2010 WL 3603276 at *1 (M.D.Fla. Sept. 9,2010). There is nothing in the
Applications to indicate that the Amici Curiae offers "timely or useful information" relevant
to the instant case.
It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
Stanley). Caterbone and Advanced Media Group's Applications for Amici Curiae Brief,
ECF Nos. [76] and [77], are DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, on December 4th, 2017."
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 22 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP
E COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case o. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
he UNITED STATES COURT OF
E OF AMENDED APPEAL was recorde
On January 8, 2018 a N
APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-10134-C re UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Stan J.
Caterbone.
On January 29, 2018 the UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Case
No. 18-10134-C re UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Stan J. Caterbone Coming from the United States
District Court, Southern District of Florida issued a JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION TO ALL PARTIES:
JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION
Please address under which theory is the district court's interlocutory order denying interested
party Stan Caterbone's motion to file an amicus brief immediately appealable. See 28 U.S.C. §
1291. In addition, please address whether Mr. Caterbone has standing to appeal from the district
court's order. See Wolffv. Cash 4 Titles, 351 F.3d 1348, 1353.58 (11th Cir. 2003).
On February 3, 2018 PRO SE PETITIONER STAN J. CATERBONE FILED A BRIEF ASWERING THE
JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION.
On June 4, 2018 Before: WILLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges the APPEAL
TO THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS WAS DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT:
"In light of the responses to the jurisdictional question. we DISMISS this appeal for lack of
jurisdiction. Stan J. Caterbone, proceeding pro Se, has appealed from an interlocutory order
denying his motion for leave to file an amicus brief in a pending criminal case brought by the
government against Esteban Santiago-Ruiz, We lack jurisdiction because Caterbone does not
appeal from a final order or an order that is immediately appealable under a statute or
jurisprudential exception. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292; CSXTransp., Inc. v, City of Garden City,
235 F.3d 1325, 1327 (I Ith Cir. 2000) (noting the general rule that this Court's jurisdiction is
limited to appeals from final orders under § 1291 or interlocutory orders appealable under
statute or jurisprudential exception).
In addition, only a litigant who is aggrieved by a judgment or order may appeal it. Wolff v. Cash 4
Titles, 351 F.3d 1348, 1353 (11th Cir. 2003). A non-party ordinarily lacks standing to appeal an
order from that case, and even parties may lack standing to appeal trial court rulings that do not
affect their interests. Id. at 1354. Standing requires a person to have suffered an injury-in-fact
that is concrete and particularized, actual or imminent, and not conjectural or hypothetical. Lujan
v. Defenders a/Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560 (1992). Here, the order denying Caterbone's request
does not affect his interests in a way sufficient to confer standing to appeal. See LUjan, 504 U.S.
at 560; Wolff, 351 F.3d at 1353.
On September 21, 2018 in the UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Case No. 18-10134-C re UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Stan J. Caterbone Coming from the United States
District Court, Southern District of Florida, Before: WILLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN and JULIE CARNES, Circuit
Judges the MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION WAS DENIED
-
BY THE COURT:
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 23 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
der dismissing this appeal for
for reconsideration of our June 4, 20
"Stan J. Caterbone's mo
lack of jurisdiction is DENIED. All other pending motions are DENIED as moot."
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 24 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
BACKGROUND OF PETI NER STAN). CATERBONE
-
SE PETITIONER STAN J.
CATERBONE is a private citizen and the majority shareholder of the United States incorporated business
Advanced Media Group, Ltd., PRO SE PETITIONER STAN J. CATERBONE was a whistle-blower and
shareholder in 1987 involving the United States Defense Contractor International Signal & Control, Plc.,
known as ISC. In 1992, International Signal & Control was indicted and found guilty of among other things
a Billion Dollar Fraud and export violations concerning illegally shipping cluster bomb technologies, missile
defense systems, and other defense systems to foreign interests including South Africa, Iraq and Saddam
Hussein. Cluster bombs and related technologies are known to have been exported to Iraq by the Chilean
Arms Dealer Carlos Cardoen, a joint venture partner of International Signal & Control. The Central
Intelligence Agency is confirmed to have been involved in a covert program to arm Iraq during the 1980's
with close ties to International Signal & Control, which allegedly included the help of the National Security
Agency, a former end user of International Signal & Control technologies under the early 1980's program
Project X. A Presidential Finding in 1984 by the Bush Administration was executed to implement the
program of arming Saddam Hussein and Iraq with the cluster bomb technologies. Serious allegations of
these programs were the focus of investigations that included the knowledge and supervision of then
appointed nominee for the Director of Central Intelligence Agency, Robert M. Gates.
Since 1987, PRO SE PETITIONER STAN J. CATERBONE has been the victim of vast civil
conspiracy that started in 1987 to cover-up allegations of fraud within International Signal & Control during
the negotiations and merger of International Signal & Control and Ferranti International of England.
Stanley J. Caterbone alleges that warrantless surveillance was used to obstruct justice and moot his
constitutional rights in an effort to divert attention away from his allegations of fraud within International
Signal & Control back in 1987, and afterwards to the present as a means to deny his access to the courts
for remedy and relief, and Federal False Claims Act violations. The business of Advanced Media Group has
been greatly compromised and intellectual property stolen during the late 1980's and early 1990's that
included information technology contracts with the United States Government.
Organized stalking and harassment began in 1987 following the public allegations of fraud within
ISC. This organized stalking and harassment was enough to drive an ordinary person to suicide. As far
back as the late 1980's PRO SE PETITIONER STAN J. CATERBONE knew that his mind was being read, or
"remotely viewed'. This was verified and confirmed when information only known to him, and never
written, spoken, or typed, was repeated by others. In 1998, while soliciting the counsel of Philadelphia
attorney Christina Rainville, (Rainville represented Lisa Michelle Lambert in the Laurie Show murder case),
someone introduced the term remote viewing through an email. That was the last time it was an issue
until 2005. The term was researched, but that was the extent of the topic. Remote Viewers may have
attempted to connect in a more direct and continuous way without success.
In 2005 the U.S. SPONSORED MIND CONTROL turned into an all-out assault of mental telepathy;
synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices and weapons that
usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim. This assault was no
coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action in U.S. District Court, or
CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288. This assault began after the handlers
remotely trained Stan 3. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The main difference opposed to most other
victims of this technology is that Stan J. Caterbone after being connected to some 20 or so individuals
ranging from CIA Operatives to current day national newscasters and celebrities, Stan J. Caterbone
remains connected 24/7 with a person who declares that she is Interscope recording artist Sheryl Crow of
Kennett Missouri. Stan J. Caterbone has spent 3 years trying to validate and confirm this person without
success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation and
the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment. See attached documents for more information.
In 2006 or the beginning of 2007 PRO SE PETITIONER STAN J. CATERBONE began his extensive
research into mental telepathy; mind control technologies; remote viewing; and the CIA mind control
program labeled MK ULTRA and it's subprograms.
In January of 2006, PRO SE PETITIONER STAN J. CATERBONE was detained at every airport security
check point, which was during a policy of random checks, and taken out of line during travel from
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to Houston, Texas, and on to Puerto Vallarta, Mexico. At the Houston Airport,
Stanley 3. Caterbone was falsely accused of carrying plastics explosives and taken to an interview room by
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 25 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP
E COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Cas
o. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
Homeland Security officials. St
y J. Caterbone was also detained for #e days in Mexico, and was not
provided with an opportunity to gain access to a flight out of the country by Mexican Officials.
Today, PRO SE PETITIONER STAN). CATERBONE is a pro se litigant in several state and local courts,
in an effort to be restored to whole since the WHISTLEBLOWING of 1987. Most notable is CATERBONE V.
The National Security Agency, NSA, et. al. In the UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD
CIRCUIT CASE NO. 17-1904. That case is a PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION FOR EMERGENCY RELIEF FILED TO
IMMEDIATELY HALT THE OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE THAT IS BEING ADMINISTERED THROUGHT THE
ILLEGAL COINTELPRO PROGRAM COUPELD WITH THE TORTURE PROGRAM.
The following is a memo of a meeting with ISC executive Mr. Lawrence Resch and
Mr. PRO SE PETITIONER STAN). CATERBONE at his office at Financial Management Group,
Ltd., which took place on June 23, 1987.
"Mr. Lawrence Resch, of San Clamente, California, was a long time associate of Mr. James Guerin
who worked as a marketing consultant, and was an ISC executive prior to the
company going public
in 1982. He served as Director of Marketing and head of Lancaster
operations for then defunct United
Chem Con, an affiliate of ISC. He was sued by Ferranti International in 1990 for $189 million dollars and
indicted and found guilty by prosecutors for his role with ISC and served a jail term.
Upon the arrival of Mr. Larry Resch, Stan Caterbone met him in the lobby of Financial
Management Group, Ltd, at which time Larry Resch said "Carl Jacobson could not attend, we had
to suddenly fly him out of the country early this morning (flew to Chile)" The
meeting was started
with the subject of the financial difficulties of United Chem Con and
possible alternatives. Larry Resch
specifically addressed the possibility of moving the
operations of United Chem Con to another facility,
with specific regards to the Renovo
Plant. Larry Resch specifically addressed the
financing
capabilities of Stan Caterbone,
along with possible management opportunities. Larry Resch also gave
financial statements and documents to Stan Caterbone for the latest fiscal year for United Chem Con. Stan
Caterbone went on to allege that United Chem Con had embezzled some $15,000,000
from the
United States Government for contracts that contained improprieties. Stan Caterbone
also
alleged
improprieties of International Signal & Control and James Guerin,
with specific regards to its role in the
United Chem Con, and its business activities as related to government contracts, Stan Caterbone noted
that he, as a legal shareholder of International Signal & Control was concerned about improper business
activities.
Larry Resch was taken by surprise by all of the above. Stan Caterbone became quite upset
by the evasiveness and the lack of specifics with regards to Larry Resch's conversation. In efforts to
thwart any further communication from James Guerin, United Chem Con, or International Signal &
Control, Stan Caterbone demanded a retainer fee of $10,000 before anyone contacted him again."
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 26 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP
ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
NISTRATION is using the old edgar Hoover COINTELPRO
Today, the TRUMP A
Program while at the same time expanding the powers of local law enforcement through 3
Executive Orders in order to Militarize Local Police Departments. The following are the effects
of the ILLEGAL AND LANDMARK COINTELPRO PROGRAM that is used against me:
As Contained In The Lancaster County Court Of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373 Where President
Federal
Donald Trump Was Added To The Defendants List On January 23, 2017 And Other State And
Court Cases; The Trump Administration Is Utilizing An Illegal COINTELPRO Program To Harass The
Directing Causing It Almost Impossible For The
Appellant, Stan J. Caterbone And Obstruct Justice By
Continuation Of Those Same Civil Actions.
The Trump Administration Signed (3) Executive Orders That Broadened The Powers Of
The City Of Lancaster Police Department To Coincide With The Above.
The Fact That Complainant Stan J. Caterbone's History With The Lancaster City Police
Department Traces Back To The 1960'S With The Targeting Of Complainant Stan J.
Caterbones Father, Samuel Caterbone, Jr. In The Very Same Manner As The Current
Targeting Of Complainant Stan J. Caterbone Today Is Reason Enough To Have
Summary Judgments In All Civil Actions In Federal And State Courts Immediately
Ordered.
THE TARGETING CONSISTS OF THE FOLLOWING:
• An Unprecedented Harassment Program Carried Out By Residents, Neighbors, Stalking Groups,
Law Enforcement, And Others.
An Unprecedented Hacking Program Of All Electronic Equipment.
• Unprecedented Torture Program Utilizing Electromagnetic And Other Exotic Weapons Developed
By The Department Of Defense And Intelligence Community.
• An Unprecedented Campaign Designed To Drain The Appellant Stan J. Caterbone Of All Cash
2015 To
Resources, Which Has Resulted In A Cash Position Of Some $60,000.00 In June Of
Nothing Today.
• The Unprecedented Campaign Of False Statements By The Residents Of 1252 Fremont Stree And
The Perjured Statements Of Lancaster City Police In Recent Criminal Summary Offenses Filed In
District Magistrate Adam Witkonis Court.
• An Unprecedented Campaign Of Daily Harassment's And Threats By The Residents Of 1252
Fremont Street, Which Has Been Ongoing Since 2006.Un Unprecedented Campaign Of Threats
Of Physical Harm In Public Spaces.
• The Unprecedented Campaign Of The Breaking And Entering Into The Residence Of The
Complainant Stan J. Caterbone Causing Vandalism, Thefts, Poisoning Of Food, And The
Strategic Placement Of Cock Roaches On A Daily Basis. This Also Involves The Theft And
Manipulation Of Court Filings And Evidence.
• The Above Are All Facilitated And Supported With Violations Of Due Process In The Complaints
To Law Enforcement.
• Complainant Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Seam Receiving Retaliatory Adverse And Harassing
Treatment Due To The Fact That 1. , I, Complainant Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se, Am The Amicus
For Former Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane In Case No. 3575 EDA 2016 In The
Eastern District Of Superior Court, Currently In Litigation.
THE CUMULATIVE RESULTS OF THE ABOVE LAYS THE FOUNDATION FOR AN UNPRECDENTED
LANDMARK CASE OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND ANTI-TRUST VIOLATIONS.
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 27 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Cas o. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
It is too easy for present and future administrations to abuse their power and utilize warrantless
surveillance as a means of subverting and obstructing justice for those that are engaged in Whistle-Blowing
cases that concern National Security. Without the proper oversight and judicial review, a Whistle Blower
can be place on terrorist lists for malicious reasons without the knowledge or just cause. This is in direct
conflict with keeping our democracy free of corruption while adhering to the spirit of the constitution in the
manner our founding fathers envisioned.
Activists, Citizens, and Voters must ensure that constitutional rights of private citizens are not
compromised and justice subverted through information obtained from warrantless surveillance upon which
there is no just cause for any allegations or association with terrorism. Whistle-Blowers are inherently
supportive of a system of checks and balances within our government that go beyond our constitutional
doctrines regarding the same. Whistle-Blowers ensure that the rule of law is universally applied to all
government officials in all branches of government. The Federal False Claims Act and its provisions protect
individuals from abuse of power, while providing relief and remedies for those that were wronged and those
that had the courage to cite a wrong.
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control Systems are also used to compliment these illegal programs to
silence WHISTLEBLOWERS and others that our government recognizes as a threat to their
illegal strategies and those that are seeking the TRUTH. Synthetic Telepathy Coupled with
Electromagnetic Weapons used for pain have been the ELECTRONIC WEAPONS OF CHOICE by
the PERPETRATORS committing these haneus crimes against, STAN J. CATERBONE since at least
2005. My father, U.S. Navy 1943 to 1946) was a victim of MK-ULTRA and experienced the same
effects since at least the early 1960's and my brother, Sammy, (U.S. Air Force 1969-19710
received the same victimization through the use of the LSD experiments of the same program.
PRO SE PETITIONER STAN]. CATERBONE stated and declared that the initial time of connection
with the SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY consisted of months of NON-STOP INTERROGATIONS BY MALE
SUBJECTS WHO IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES AS CIA OPERATIVES. The interrogations lasted hours
upon hours at a time and covered just about every aspect of AMICUS STAN J. CATERBONE'S life.
The "HANDLERS", for lack of a better term, not only focused on the WHISTLEBLOWING
ACTIVITIES OF ISC IN 1987, but also covered mundane everyday experiences, as a form to
harass and torture.
In late spring of 2005, the "HANDLERS" introduce females to the sessions. To this day, the
torture consists of the same, interrogations mixed in with harassment, sex, and humor. It is
the opinion of PRO SE PETITIONER STAN J. CATERBONE, that the only way to keep from
desensitizing and numbing to the harassment and pain is to experience pleasure and laughter
so as to keep the magnitude of the pain at it's highest level.
THIS CAN BE SUBSANTIATED AND VALIDATED BY THE FACT THAT THE SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION UNDER HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES GRANTED PRO SE APELLANT DEBTOR
SYMPTOMS
AND
STAN J. CATERBONE E DISABILITY BENEFITS IN AUGUST OF 2009 FOR
ILLNESSES RELATED TO U.S. SPONSORED MIND CONTROL, AND IN FACT STATED IN THE AWARD
LETTER THAT DISABILITY WAS DETERMINED TO BEGIN IN DECEMBER OF 2005; THE DATE A PRO
SE PETITIONER STAN J. CATERBONE DECLARED THAT THE SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY HAD GONE FULLTIME 24/7, WITHOUT INTERUPTION, TO THIS DAY.
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 28 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
REA
NS FOR GRANTING THERIT
ARGUMENT ONE
Craig Stedman, Lancaster County District Attorney WAS/IS a Former Military
Intelligence Officer COINCIDENCE that PRO SE PETITIONER STAN J. CATERBONE HAS
HAD OVER 30 ARRESTS DISMISSED, MOST PRIOR TO ANY HEARINGS OR TRIALS
SINCE 1987 LEADING TO FALSE ARRESTS AND MALICIOUS PROSECUTIONS?
-
-
From the Pennsylvania Coalition for Civil Justice Reform Judicial Candidate
Questionnaire
Do you believe our judicial system adequately deters and penalizes
frivolous litigation? If not, what reforms would you like to see?
Please see my previous response. I would add that I have
been subject to numerous frivolous lawsuits from people I
have prosecuted. My office, and the county, has had to spend
considerable resources fighting what were clearly vindictive
and retaliatory lawsuits from criminal defendants so I
certainly can identify with concern in this area.
Law School
Office of the Secretary of Defense Honors Legal Internship
Washington, DC Todd, Gemmel, Nugent and Fitzgerald,
Linwood, NJ
Military
United States Army Intelligence Center and School
Officer Basic Course, Ft. Huachuca, Arizona, 1987
Graduated-first in class in academics
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 29 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP
E COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Cas o. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
WRONGFUL PROSECUT S AND FALSE ARRESTS:
Cc2706 Terroristic Threats Ml Quashed/ Dismis/Demur Sus
September 1, 1987
Cc2902-1 Unlawful Restraint Ml Quashed/Dismis/ Demur Sus
September 3, 1987
Cc3304a2 Criminal Mischief F3 Nolle Prossed/ Withdrawn
September 3, 1987
Cc33502 Burglary Fl Nolle Prossed/ Withdrawn
September 3, 1987
Cc3701a1 Robbery Fl Nolle Prossed/ Withdrawn
S. September 3, 1987
Cc3921a Theft by Unlaw Tak F3 Nolle Prossed/ Withdrawn
September 3, 1987
Cc3933a1 Unlaw Use Comp F3 Nolle Prossed/Withdrawn
September 3, 1987
S. December 5, 2006 1 18 §5503 §§ A2 Disorderly Conduct Unreasonable Noise! Withdrawn
December 5, 2006 1 18 §3926 §§ A4 Theft of Services-Aquisition / Withdrawn
December 5, 2006 1 18 §2709 §§ A7 Harassment Repeat In Manner! Withdrawn
Withdrawn
January 18, 2007 1 75 § 1543 §§ A Driving While Oper Priv Susp Or Revoked !
January 18, 2007 1 75 § 1786 §§ F Driving Without Reqd Insur! Withdrawn
Withdrawn
January 23, 2007 1 285-21d No Parking or Stopping Permitted !
Withdrawn
285-30a
Meter
Violation
January 23, 2007 1
/
January 23, 2007 1 18 § 6501 §§ Al Scatter Rubish Upon Land / Withdrawn
January 23, 2007 1 285-21d No Parking or Stopping Permitted / Withdrawn
January 23, 2007 1 285-30a Meter Violation / Withdrawn
18 § 5503 §A4 Disorderly Conduct Hazardous/Phys Off Not Guilty
April 30, 2007 1
18 § 5507 §A Obstruction of Hwy! Not Guilty
April 30, 2007 2
18 §2709 §§ A7 Harassment Repeat In Manner! Not Guilty
April 30, 2007 1
75 § 3111 §A Disregard Traffic Control Device / Not Guilty
April 30, 2007 1
18 § 5104 Resist Arrest/Other Law Enforcement / Withdrawn
May 10, 2007 M2
18 § 1543 §§ Make Rep/Sell/Etc Off Weap / Nolle Pros
May 10, 2007 3M1
75 § 1543 §§ A Driving While Oper Priv Susp Or Revoked! Not Guilty
May 29, 2007 1
November 1, 2007 S 75 § 3714 §§ A Careless Driving / Nolle Pros
November 1, 2007 S 75 § 3802 §§ Al* DUI: Gen Imp! Inc of Driv Safely / Nolle Pros
TR000185-08 Driving Under Suspension By PA State Police / Erased
July 3, 2008
Records Wrong
TR000185-08 DUI Charge By PA State Police / Erased Records
July 3, 2008
Wrong CHARGES WERE FROM A COUNTY OUTSIDE PITTSBURG, PENNSYLVANIA, AND THE
REAL DEFENDANT HAD THE SAME JULY 15 BIRTHDAY AND LAST NAME STARTING WITH CAT
February 2018 harassment charge before MDJ Sponaugle
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 30 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case o. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
ARGUMENT TWO
For the first time, a youtube video appeared on a website of a 2014 interview of
Edward Snowden by Brian Williams and NBC NEWS outlining an NSA PROGRAM of
REMOTE NEURAL MONITORING. The following is the link to that interview
-
Remote Neural Monitoring: How They Spy on Your Thoughts
-
Anonymous
-
http://www.anonews.co/spy-on-your-thoughts/#disqus_thread
How many times did you have thoughts that you never wanted to share with
anyone, and have been constantly worried at the thought of someone ever finding out
about these thoughts?
All of us have been through this process, and the new and improved technologies
being developed around the world, supposedly to deal with crime and terrorism, and
inadvertently intrude on one's privacy, should probably bring us all to the brink of
paranoia.
These technologies are funded by governments at the highest level and some of
the countries involved include USA, RUSSIA, CHINA, UK, Spain, Germany and France.
R.N.M. works remotely (ever wondered why have we all been driven relentlessly
towards wireless systems?) to control the brain under the objective to detect any
criminal thought taking place inside the mind of a possible culprit. Inevitable question:
How can you isolate a criminal thought if you do not have a comparative measure of
non-criminal thoughts?
This undertaking is based on two principles:
• The research studies have shown that the humanoid intellect thinks at a speed of
about 5 kilobits per second and, therefore, does not have the capability to contest
with supercomputers acting via satellites, implants and biotelemetry.
• The human brain has a characteristic set of bioelectric resonance structure. By
using supercomputers, the R.N.M. system can home in on it, and send messages
through an embedded individual's nervous system in order to affect their
performance in a preferred way.
The entire system has been developed after about 50 years (!) of electromagnetic
human experimentation, claimed to be involuntary. According to many scientists
involved in this program (their names are not revealed for obvious reasons), within a
few years it is expected that DNA microchips, under the guise of medical
breakthroughs that will be presented to launch the disease cure processes on speed
and efficiency, will be implanted in the humanoid cereberum, which would make it
inherently controllable. R.N.M. will then have the ability to read and govern a person's
emotional mental procedures along with the involuntary and visions.
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 31 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Cas 0. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
compliment these illegal
ontrol Systems are also used
U.S. Sponsored Mm
programs to silence WHISTLEBLOWERS and others that our government recognizes as
a threat to their illegal strategies and those that are seeking the TRUTH. Synthetic
Telepathy Coupled with Electromagnetic Weapons used for pain have been the
ELECTRONIC WEAPONS OF CHOICE by the PERPETRATORS committing these haneus
crimes against, PRO SE PLAINTIFF STAN J. CATERBONE since at least 2005. Samuel P.
Caterbone, Jr., the father of PRO SE PLAINTIFF STAN). CATERBONE, U.S. Navy 1943 to
1947 was a victim of MK-ULTRA and experienced the same effects since at least the
early 1960's. Brainwashing techniques via electro-shock therapy, synthetic telepathy,
vandalism to property, extortion of property and businesses were first used against
him a prototype for later use against PRO PLAINTIFF STAN). CATERBONE. Ironically
the Lancaster City Police Department were the AGENTS OF CHOICE in both
occurrences.
-
PRO SE PLAINTIFF STAN J. CATERBONE'S brother, Samuel A. Caterbone, (Sammy)
(U.S. Air Force 1969-1971) received the same victimization through the use of the LSD
experiments of the same program while in the United States Air Force and after being
discharged.
PRO SE PLAINTIFF STAN). CATERBONE declared that after an explosive harassment
campaign, connection with the SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY occurred in 2004-2005. The
synthetic telepathy first consisted of months of NON-STOP INTERROGATIONS BY MALE
SUBJECTS WHO IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES AS CIA OPERATIVES. The interrogations
lasted hours upon hours at a time and covered just about every aspect of Pro Se
PLAINTIFF STAN). CATERBONE'S life. The "HANDLERS", for lack of a better term, not
only focused on the WHISTLEBLOWING ACTIVITIES OF ISC IN 1987, but also covered
mundane everyday experiences, as a form to harass and torture.
In late spring of 2005, the "HANDLERS" introduce females to the sessions. To this
day, the torture consists of the same, interrogations mixed in with harassment, sex,
and humor. It is the opinion of Pro Se PLAINTIFF STAN). CATERBONE, that the only
way to keep from desensitizing and numbing the harassment and pain is to experience
pleasure and laughter so as to keep the magnitude of the pain at it's highest level.
THIS CAN BE SUBSANTIATED AND VALIDATED BY THE FACT THAT THE SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION UNDER HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES GRANTED Pro Se
PLAINTIFF STAN ). CATERBONE DISABILITY BENEFITS IN AUGUST OF 2009 FOR
SYMPTOMS AND ILLNESSES RELATED TO U.S. SPONSORED MIND CONTROL, AND IN
FACT STATED IN THE AWARD LETTER THAT DISABILITY WAS DETERMINED TO BEGIN
IN DECEMBER OF 2005; THE DATE PRO SE PLAINTIFF STAN ). CATERBONE DECLARED
THAT THE SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY HAD GONE FULL-TIME 24/7, WITHOUT
INTERUPTION, TO THIS DAY.
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 32 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
The NEXUS to Inte tional Signal and Control, Plc., r ISC; the CIA; the NSA;
Lancaster, Pennsylvania; and U.S. Sponsored Mind Control comes through ISC Board of
Director, Admiral Bobby Ray Inman. Bobby Ray Inman was the former Director of the
NSA, and The Director of U.S. Naval Intelligence. Like today, when foreign police is
politicized for partisan reasons, patriots and traitors are often confused as being one in
the same. The operations by ISC and the respective intelligence agencies were
conspired for tactical and logistical reasons that the Department of Defense and others
could not find a way to communicate it's objectives to Congress for approval without
compromising it's missions. ISC founder James Guerin and others were indicted in
1991.and sentenced to prison terms in 1992.
One must remember that the U.S. Sponsored Mind Control Programs were the
direct result of the Soviet Union's accomplishments using Microwave Technologies to
bombard the U.S. Embassy in Moscow as early the 1950's and the use of German
Psychiatrists by Adolf Hitler in the 1940's developing psychological warfare programs.
Both the German and Soviet Mind Control Programs predate that of the United States.
Thus, the beginning of the Mind Control Arms Race. Just this year, the Trump
Administration introduced the NEW MILITARY SPACE AGENCY, in an effort to formalize
the weaponization of Space and Microwave Weapons under one agency. This will
convert the Department of Defense programs and that of the U. S. Intelligence
Agencies to this new Military Space Agency.
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 33 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Cas o. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
PRO SE PLAINTIF
AMICUS BRIEFS in the
AN J. CATERBONE has pen
following courts related to illegal surveillance programs and U.S. Sponsored Mind
Control:
• UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
Case No. 18-5803; CATERBONE v. Donald).
Trump, President of the United States, et. al,; a Landmark Habeus Corpus Case
trying to set precedent that due to the illegal surveillance, torture, and control of
a victims mind, HABEUS CORPUS should no longer be limited to a prison being
defined as a physical facility.
-
• UNITED STATES THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
CATERBONE v. The National Security Agency, or NSA
-
Case No. 18-3326
• UNITED STATES ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS (Atlanta, GA) Case No.
18-10134; AMICUS pending for Estaban Santiago, The Ft. Lauderdale Shooter
Case
-
• UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR WESTERN WASHINGTON (Seattle, WA)
Case No. CR18-0086-JCC; AMICUS for THANH CONG PHAN (Alleged Victim of U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control who earlier this year mailed several packages containing
explosives to Military Facilities in and around Washington, D.C. Who wrote letters
complaining of common symptoms, including voices or synthetic telepathy and
control of body parts, ie hands, arms, etc.,)
-
Broward County Court (Broward County, Florida)
Case No. 18001958CF10A;
AMICUS recorded on May 2, 2018 for Nikolas Cruz re THE PARKLAND HIGH
SCHOOL MASSACRE(Nikolas Cruz was another alleged victim of U.S. Sponsored
Mind Control, like Estaban Santiago was had some training by the U.S. Military in
Firearms and Shooting, and also made specific claims of synthetic telepathy, or
voices in the head. Both victims, like Steven Paddack in the Las Vegas Shooting
Massacre, had been suspiciously allowed to slip through the hands of several law
enforcement agencies prior to the shootings.)
-
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 34 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUPREME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
ENCE ON HARASSMENT
of a transcript from THE CO
The following is a segm
AND COVERT SURVEILLANCE of October 1 and October 2, 2016 in Germany. Dr. Nich
Begich describes the Electronic Weapons, their history, and their exploitation by the
U.S. Government. IN ORDER TO DISCREDIT THE USE OF ELECTRONIC WEAPONS ON
UNSUSPECTING U.S. CITIZENS ONE MUST BE ABLE TO LEGITIMATELY DISCREDIT DR.
NICK BEGICH AND THE FOLLOWING TRANSCIRPT.
Dr. Nick Begich is the eldest son of the late United States Congressman from
Alaska, Nick Begich Sr., and political activist Peggie Begich. He is well known in Alaska
for his own political activities. He was twice elected President of both the Alaska
Federation of Teachers and the Anchorage Council of Education. He has been pursuing
independent research in the sciences and politics for most of his adult life. Begich
received Doctor of Medicine (Medicina Alternitiva), honoris causa, for independent
work in health and political science, from The Open International University for
Complementary Medicines, Colombo, Sri Lanka, in November 1994. He co-authored
with Jeane Manning the book Angels Don't Play This HAARP; Advances in Tesla
The Revolution: Toward a
Technology. Begich has also authored Earth Rising
Thousand Years of Peace and and his latest book Earth Rising II- The Betrayal of
Science, Society and the Soul both with the late James Roderick. His latest work is
The Technologies of Political Control or Tools for Peak
Controlling the Human Mind
Performance. Begich has published articles in science, politics and education and is a
well known lecturer, having presented throughout the United States and in nineteen
countries. He has been featured as a guest on thousands of radio broadcasts reporting
on his research activities including new technologies, health and earth science related
issues. He has also appeared on dozens of television documentaries and other
programs throughout the world including BBC-TV, CBC-TV, TeleMundo, and others.
Begich has served as an expert witness and speaker before the European Parliament.
He has spoken on various issues for groups representing citizen concerns, statesmen
and elected officials, scientists and others. He is the publisher and co-owner of
Earthpulse Press. He served as Tribal Administrator/Village Planner for the Chickaloon
Village Council, a federally recognized American Indian Tribe of the Athabascan Indian
Nation for five years and served four years as the Executive Director of The Lay
Institute of Technology, Inc. a Texas non-profit corporation. Currently Begich consults
for tribal organizations, private corporations and others in a number of research areas.
Dr. Begich is credited with persuading the EUROPEAN UNION TO BAN SPACE BASED
WEAPONS. Dr. Begich is a single person with five adult children, and four
grandchildren.
-
-
DR. NICK BEGIC 2015 LECTURE TRANSCRIPT
"And so I decided I would go in and look into this issue independently. And I did. I
picked up maybe 30 articles and papers, design specifications, some things, and with
friends encouraging me to publish, I published the first article that I had written on
HAARP back in 1994. So it's been a very long time ago, extremely low frequency
signals or ELFs. These are signals that can be biologically active, can affect us as
human beings and in very specific ways. And in particular, certain applications of the
and this gives you sort of a graphic illustration of the focus. These view
technology
graphs, actually, were given to me by the inventor, Bernard Eastlund, prior to his
passing. And we utilized them in our publications and in some of our work. So this
gives you kind of a graphic showing the radio frequency from the array, moving up into
the ionosphere and focusing that energy.
--
His initial concept was to create a global shield, to be able to utilize the natural
magnetic field lines that surround the earth, be able to punch energy into this and then
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 35 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Cas o. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
create this kind of global ielding effect. And the idea wa hat any electronic device
piercing that energy would be disrupted, like satellites, intercontinental ballistic
missiles, virtually any electronic device that ran into this field of energy that was being
amplified would be destroyed.
and this kind of shows that, again,
Now, one of the other interesting parts of this
utilizing one of Eastlund's graphics. So you can see like a field line and then you see
this cork-screwing energy going around it. That energy naturally is occurring from the
southern polar regions into the northern polar regions. And, in this case, they actually
actually utilize the energy on the ground to couple with the natural energy,
couple
and then coming from the north to the south, create this cork-screwing effect, which
accelerates the electrons and then creates this global shield.
--
-
Now, that was his initial concept. And as a concept, it caught the attention of a number
of people and eventually got funding from the Congress, initially at 30 million, and over
the last few decades now over almost 300 million, which in dollars is not a lot of
money, but when you consider, this is sort of the pinnacle of billions of dollars spent in
ionosphere research over many decades.
I'm going to skip
What caught my attention in terms of the technology of Eastlund
was the idea that you could manipulate the
some of these that are not so relevant
and I'll use this as a better example. So one of the thoughts was that if
ionosphere
you could punch or pulse energy into the ionosphere so think about this energy going
up and, like, a hammer ringing a bell. Every time it hits that ionosphere, the ionosphere
itself vibrates and then it begins to send a signal in the ELF range. So you have a high
frequency signal going up, punching the ionosphere, the ionosphere which is energized
then acts as a broadcast antenna in the sky bringing back an ELF signal to the earth,
and in this case covering an entire hemisphere.
--
--
--
-
Now, ELF signals, extremely low frequency signals, are very long wavelengths. They
penetrate the earth and sea. They're utilized for communication with submarines, as an
example, the depth, because short wavelengths won't penetrate the earth and sea.
They're also used for what's called earth-penetrating tomography, which in simple
language or by analogy would be like x-raying the earth or looking into the earth for
underground structures. But one of the side effects of ELF is the entrainment effect on
the human mind. Because ELF signals will lock onto in what's called a frequency
following response. And you can use a lot of different techniques to create a frequency
following response. You can use flickering light, you can use binaural beat, which I'll
explain in a few minutes. You can use electromagnetic fields such as this, or even the
power grid itself can be modulated in such a way to create a signal that the human
body will join with, will couple with, and begin to follow. It doesn't take a great deal of
energy to accomplish this. This is the one that triggered my real interest in HAARP,
because this is the one that everybody kind of ignored and said, oh. In fact, the HAARP
planners said, well, if ELF has a biological effect, it's a side effect. It's an unintended
consequence. We heard that phrase earlier today. But I don't believe that. I believe
that it's an intended consequence. It's intended to grade populations in very specific
ways.
Now, this book was mentioned by my friend earlier today, "Between Two Ages", by
Zbigniew Brzezinski. (FATHER OF MSNBC HOST MIKA BRZEZINSKI OF MORNING JOE
(Joe Scarborugh whom both got married this Spring).
And why this is an important book, it was written National Security Adviser to
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 36 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
President Carter. This is ound the time that Kissinger Othink tank, so to speak.
Now, find this book. I really encourage you to find this book and read it, because it is
not a prediction of what will come with technology. It's the blueprint, in fact. You can
he writes in a pretty convoluted style. It's a little
read this. When I first read it
difficult even in English to understand. But I really encourage you to read it because he
predicted the economic changes that took place, the political changes that took place in
the world over the last 40 years with a great deal of accuracy. And some will say it
really wasn't the prediction. It was the plan.
--
If you look within this text between Pages and 56, you!lt see a section that's dedicated
to the kind of technologies we're talking about today, a mind control technology. And
what Zbigniew referenced was a guy named J. F. Gordon MacDonald. And he was a
or, actually, a chapter in a book and the
geophysicist at UCL. He wrote a book
chapter was called, "How to Wreck Your Environment", which this is before Earth Day,
okay, so he could get away with that. It was 1969 when that book was actually
published. But what he said that caught Zbigniew Brzezinski's attention was, he said, if
we could ever figure out how to electronically stroke the ionosphere in just the right
way, we could return a signal to the earth that would influence the behavior of people
over huge geographic areas.
--
Now, that's a pretty profound thing. But we didn't have a way to stroke the ionosphere
in 1969. But we did by the 1990s. And that was, in fact, and is, in fact, the HAARP
and it was kind of, in a gross sort
system that can accomplish this. So the idea was
of way, primitive, if you will, but what the intention was, was that if you could pulse
the ionosphere, return this ELF signal to the earth, you could agitate the population in
very specific ways. You could make them passive, less aggressive, or the opposite by
just amplifying that signal. And I'll explain a little bit of that as we go on.
--
The other person that comes out in the last presentations, Jose Delgado, and this book
he wrote, "Physical Control of the Mind: Toward a Psychocivilized Society". And this is,
again, a 1960s book. Those images that you saw in just this short video clip of
Delgado's work, there is a good section in this text as well showing that. But in those
days they used implants. They had to physically put something in the brain. And what
he was actually educated in electrophysiology at the
Jose Delgado originally did
University of Madrid. He graduated in 1950. Electrophysiology, as a degree field,
thinking about it in 1950, now 65 years ago, most people don't even realize that's an
area of higher education today, much less that far back. One of my mentors, Raul
Makayla (phonetic), he actually graduated University of Madrid in 1958, and his area
of interest was, essentially, the same, biomagnetic and electric fields, effects on human
physiology, and he spent his career studying that.
--
Delgado, at Yale University, he initially was mapping the brain of primates and humans
by stimulating various portions of the brain to figure out what was responsible for
what kind of activity. And then he began to utilize the implants in those dramatic ways
in those film clips with the charging bull and he throws the switch and the bull stops,
to demonstrate that you could take a creature from passive to highly aggressive to
passive to highly aggressive, just like flipping on and off the lights in your living room.
What Delgado discovered by the mid-'80s is that you didn't need any implants. You just
needed to manipulate the energy itself. And you didn't need a great deal of energy.
I forget the amount of energy surrounding us now. Was it a
Now, we've heard
quintillion? I believe it was 18 zeros after the one that we heard earlier. Back when I
wrote the HAARP book in '94, just radio frequency energy alone, it was 200 million
times more around us every day than nature created in 1994. Now, when you think
--
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 37 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUPREME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
about it, what did Delga
iscover? He discovered that
fiftieth of the amount of
energy in the natural background noise of the earth was sufficient to manipulate the
behavior of human beings if you could hit the right frequencies, if you could hit those
window frequencies that stimulated that kind of activity.
Now, if you think about this
again, by analogy, think about dialing through the radio
stations on a radio. In between the stations you get the white noise, the static, you get
no clear signal. But when you have resonance between the transmitter and the
receiver, then you get a nice, clear signal. The same is true in our physiology. Whether
you're looking at stimulating or affecting a specific element in the body, molecules in
the body, cell structures or organ structures or even the human mind, it's about
manipulating the underlying energy.
--
When you think about medical science in terms of how the fork in the road is and how
this kind of applies to why don't we know more about this today, well, there's lots of
literature now. 25,000 sources, I think we heard quoted earlier today. 25,000 sources
talking about the energy interactions with the human body. That is a lot of information.
But what happened in medical science? A lot of people that went into life sciences, they
were really good in the chemistry, a little weak in the math, so they went to life
sciences. People who were a little better in the math, they went to physics. And then
once upon a time, these two came together and we got biophysics, which is really the
root of real health science. If you really want to get to the meat of it, you've got to get
to the energetic interactions that create chemical reactions that then manifest in the
body.
And that's what we kind of miss in so much of our medicine. We followed a
pharmaceutical model as opposed to an electromagnetic model. In the '30s, prior to
World War II, that fork in the road was being explored pretty aggressively, the
energetic models. But they were somehow lost in that shuffle and we ended up with
the pharmaceutical industry, and the results of that, I think we can all not be quite so
proud of. In terms of where the technology is going and where a lot of the science is
going, it will be electromedicine that cures most of what we call incurable. It will also
be that which enhances or debilitates human consciousness itself.
Now, Jose Delgado, when he figured out that you didn't need implants, you just need
to manipulate the energy itself, this became kind of the essence of sort of where
everything went from there. But I want to roll back a little bit, a little bit back in time,
and talk more about the evolution of mind control as technology starting with the work
at Harvard University of a gentleman, Estabrook, who was working in the Harvard
hypnotherapy labs in the 1920s. You can look Estabrook up. Look him up at the Library
of Congress and you'll see his list of publications, and I recommend that you do that.
What he decided was that you could create what we would call today a Manchurian
candidate. You could 17 take certain individuals, put them in a very, very deep state of
hypnosis and then over a period of time train them so they would be like this super spy
that you could send into another country and they'd hang out for a year or two, but if
they got captured, they wouldn't really remember any of their former self, and then
when they came back, in this case, into the United States, that we would then give
them the appropriate suggestions and then extract the intelligence from them.
And this is what Estabrook was working on. By the 1930s, a lot of his work was being
classified and he continued to work in this field up through the 1960s. His last book
and I always like to read the last thing someone writes, you know, because it tells you
a 6 lot about, sort of, the conclusions and there are things that you might discard bits
--
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 38 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SU11E COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Ca
. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
0ightens you. And what he
and pieces as science entens you and your experience i
talked about in that last book were the experiments he was involved in using LSD and
other 11 hallucinogenics in mind control, which he actually talked about in a favorable
sense.
And for those of you that remember, the CIA was heavily involved in this in the 1960s
and, in fact, the whole area pre-19605 going back even to the Korean War, which is
sort of my next mark on the timeline. The Korean War, we had prisoners, patriotic
young Americans come back from war and they're handing out Communist leaflets on
street corners, and the term or the phrase brainwashing came into being. That's where
it came from. It came from that series of events after the Korean War.
The idea of being able to manipulate people's behavior and change them so profoundly
became of interest to the predecessor of the Central Intelligence Agency and then later
the Central Intelligence Agency. And what they looked at were lots of different ways
to
3 manipulate human behavior. Now, when I was researching my first book with Jeane
Manning, "Angels Don't Play This HAARP", I was looking for a good source document
that would speak to this, because you always read about this in secondary, tertiary
sources. And so I'm in a book room, a big surplus book room, and I'm telling this guy
that I know, I really need this source. And as I'm having this conversation, I reach
unconsciously behind me into a box and I pull out this book. This is a really interesting
one. This is actually a presidential report. This is a report that was commissioned at
the time, 1975, to look at the abuses of the CIA. Now, this came out of the Church
Committee reports, which were Congressional hearings that took place in the early
'70s to investigate the abuses of the Central Intelligence Agency, the kind of abuses
that we read about today, because nothing really changed. Supposedly, this was to
change things.
Now, what's in this report? The LSD experiments were in this report. The idea the
Central 24 Intelligence Agency was domestically infiltrating civil rights groups, antiwar
groups, people that, essentially, opposed the government within the United States,
which was not part of their mandate, in fact, was illegal. The fact that they were
reading people's mail, utilizing unwitting victims and experiments for mind control. All
of this came out in this report in 1975. And yet, the CIA continues to do it even to this
day.
Think about the kinds of activities that have been reported pretty widely over the last
few years, whether it's digging through garbage to blackmail other diplomats, which is
something our Intelligence community does, whether it's to send pallet loads of money
into countries like we did in Afghanistan to bribe officials as a way of doing business,
or whether it's to assassinate people with drones, kidnap people and torture them.
Now, most of us don't know people like this, but this is the government that I
unfortunately have guiding my country right now. It's a government of criminals. Now,
people want to talk about, oh, this couldn't happen here. It has happened here. It's
happened for decades in the United States. This report by the President's Commission
touches the very tip of that iceberg.
this guy, Captain Tyler, he later became a colonel
This is another document. This is
and retired. He was involved in pretty much the sort of esoteric side of some of the
this chapter out of this book is called, "Lowgovernment research. This book
Intensity 5 Conflict and Modern Technology". It was prepared by Maxwell Air Force
--
-
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 39 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUW E COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
echnologies. But in this
a variety
Base in 1984. And it wasing about a large
you
look
at,
certainly,
the
subject
lines,
you
have stimulation of,
if
particular one,
bones* generation, healing of fractures, treatment of disease, healing of wounds. You
look at behavior modification in animals. You know, some of these things that are
listed here were kind of under the mysterious category. They couldn't really explain
what was happening in 1984. But the idea was to stimulate research in these fields. So
a number of things happened. A lot of money started to flow into these areas. One of
the reports that came out in the 1980s as a result of some of this was the
Radiofrequency Dosimetry Handbook. It was a 21 big, thick handbook. It was produced
by the University of Utah under contract to the United States Air Force to determine the
radiofrequency dosages that were required to override every vital organ of the human
body, whether it be the heart, the liver, the lungs, the kidneys, just sort of preempt
their natural function to be able to do it remotely. And the idea was to take that leap
of technology and begin to apply it into weapon systems.
--
Mind control. "The Economist". Cover story. Some of you will remember this one. This
is 2002, I believe. Yeah, 2002. And what this cover story was about was about the
ethics of mind control. Not saying, hey, does it exist or doesn't it exist? It's just saying
it's here right now. We really need to be debating whether we should advance this
technology, whether we should limit this technology. "The Economist" is certainly a
unfortunately,
credible publication. Not too much happened from this story. This is
it's not showing up.
--
you can get this one on my website. I'll give you my website, because this
November
is a very important document. The Navy set up a new set of regulations for human
experiments. It was approved in 2006. You know, in history, that's like tomorrow and
yesterday, right? It's, like, now. And in this they specifically call out mind control
experiments and who has the authority to approve them. And the persons with the
authority to approve them is under secretaries of the Navy in the case of Navy
Intelligence or Naval research.
--
Now, it's not just CIA. Naval Intelligence does this work. The Marines have a section on
non-lethal weapons that this falls under. The Air Force has the electromagnetic
directorate, which is working in an area called controlled effects, which deal, again,
with mind control and physiological effects on human beings. In fact, they publish a
publication called "Technology Horizons". I believe it's the June 2004 issue. You can
look it up. The cover story is on controlled effects.
Now, what are controlled effects? The first effect is attacking hardware; you know, like
equipment, like machines, to be able to interfere with the flow of electrons through
circuits to disrupt those machines to operate. Not using bombs and bullets and the
things of history, but using energy itself to manipulate hardware.
The second sort of level of controlled effects talked about in that article is the idea of
manipulating the software, the systems that run those systems, so that you can disrupt
the software, then you disrupt the hardware, and things collapse. And the third leg of
controlled effects is the human operator. And what they say in this particular article
produced by the electromagnetic director of the Air Force is that we can target or
create the illusion of all of the senses in the human body; sight, sound, touch, taste, to
give people complete memory sets, complete experiential sets that you wouldn't be
able to distinguish the synthetic from the real.
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 40 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP
E COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Cas o. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
Now, think about that for moment. What does that do to urt testimony in 20 years
if this becomes the norm? They're now talking about using this for post-traumatic
stress syndrome folks, people coming back from warfare. This just sort of cleans up the
garbage of the mind and gets rid of that stress. Some people think that's a great idea.
Personally, I think that's the biggest mistake we could ever make. Because whatever
what used to happen in warfare
those servicemen and women were engaged in
what happened in World War II when everybody came back, they said, I don't ever
want to see my children in these things, I don't want to see my grandchildren in these
things. Wars need to be put down, not amplified. When you take the human factor out
of warfare and it becomes like a video game, then our willingness to withdraw from
direct conflict no longer happens. And think about where our military science has
gone. In fact, I want to mention another very important publication. It was produced
by the US Army War College (C ARLISLE, PENNSYLVANIA) in the early 1980s. It's
called the "Revolution of Military Affairs and Conflict Short of War". And this particular
paper was talking about revolution of military affairs. What is that exactly?
-
--
This is a leap as important as the introduction of gunpowder in the middle ages in
Europe, as important as atomic weapons in the last century. And that's how they
characterize it. And what this is is the leap where we move from ordinance, from
bullets, bombs, things that rip tissue and tear things up, to electromagnetic weapon
systems that keep sort of the hardware intact, but debilitate the human operator to the
point of being combat ineffective. Or conversely, enhance the possibilities within our
own combatants while degrading the abilities of others.
There's simple ways that you can achieve this. You can introduce to the battlefield
certain elemental compounds that in small background amounts would not be
considered dangerous. Let me give you iodine as an example. We all need a certain
amount of iodine in the body to maintain thyroid function. But if you have too much
iodine, you'll get poisoned. You'll die. You'll get sick. So what can you do? You can
send a signal in that resonates the very same signal strength and frequency as iodine,
you can send that signal in and the body will begin to react as if its gotten this massive
load of iodine and show all the symptoms of iodine poisoning. You check the thyroid;
check the blood, it's not there. Mystery illness. Something as simple as that for
manipulating large populations, not necessarily with their consent and not necessarily
with clear knowledge, and nothing shows up in the background that would say why
this poison actually exists that would account for this. A simple way.
One of the other ways that this technology can be exploited is really quite simple.
There was an article produced by "Parameters", which is a military publication.
I believe it was the Fall 1998, but you can
"Parameters". You can look it up. It's the
look up the article name called, "The Mind has no Firewall".
--
It's a very important article. This article talked about all the various ways in which you
could introduce mind effects or mind control technologies using modern technology
today. And the original article was actually written in a military journal called
"Orienteer" published in what is now Russia. What's interesting about this is it said
you could use any electromagnetic carrier, whether it be radio, TV, the Internet, now
cell phones; but, essentially, any of these carriers, you can modulate a signal on them
that will manipulate behavior of segments of the population. And the Russians
demonstrated this in a couple of different ways. There was a program. It was called
"Undercurrents". It aired in the CBC, which is the Canadian Public Broadcasting
System. "Undercurrents" did two really interesting stories that I got to participate in.
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 41 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUPREME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
One was on HAARP and
other was on mind control. A on the mind control story
this was a very popular program in Canada at the time and this
that they did
particular segment was their highest rated that they had ever run. And they had folks
that came in who were involved in the "Star Wars" initiative during the Reagan
Administration that couldn't talk about what they did in the White House, but they
could talk about what they observed in Russia.
--
you could
And one of the things that they talked about was the idea that you could
create, sort of, this white noise and on this white noise carry a signal. And so they put
out this message, bring us cake. And Russians at tea time, you know, they eat these
little cakes? I guess you do that in other parts of Europe as well.
--
And so at the appointed time they began to broadcast this. And workers from within
that building and on the street were bringing cake into the meeting room without
really knowing why they were doing it. They just felt like doing it. Well, that was, in
fact, what they were programmed to do. Now, this goes back. We're talking about 15year-old technology. And when you think about sort of where did it go from there, in
2006, there were a couple contracts left by DARPA, which does research for the
defense industry in the United States. And DARPA used to be run by a guy named Tony
Tether. Tony Tether was a good friend of Ben Eastlund's. Now, what they were doing
then was, they had left two contracts to the University of California for what's called
electronic telepathy. Okay. Electronic telepathy. The idea of reading another person's
mind at a distance by analyzing the emanations coming from this area, being able to
analyze that and determine and interpret what it is. And then the other half of the
contract was to create complex signals to see if you could transfer that array, so to
speak, of signals into another person's consciousness and whether they would
perceive the same images.
Now, there was work done by Elizabeth Rauscher and her late husband, Bill Van Bise,
in this very same area. In fact, I have a copy of their unpublished paper where they
actually built an electronic circuit where they could take a person in one room and a
person in another room, attach this person to that circuit and his person to that circuit,
and then, you know, the psychic card where they show the triangles, the squares and
the circles and the little squiggly lines, a hundred percent accurate with nine test
subjects who had never experienced consciously in any way any sense of extrasensory
perceptions or psychic perceptions. They did it with hardware, transferring thoughts
from one to the other.
which tells me it's probably a little more simple than what DARPA's doing. But
Now
when Ben Eastlund was doing work on HAARP and he was doing other work for DARPA
at the time and we had talked about him in our first publication, and then actually after
publication became friends, and Ben Eastlund's attitude was, you know, some things
just shouldn't be done. And one of the things that he had been working on was
whether modification technologies, which he was at that time and when we first met,
making that technology available to the military. And after some dialogue with us and
others, he decided there's certain technologies that are not safe in the hands of
military.
--
At one point along the course I began doing quite a bit of work on this whole mind
effects issue. And I caught the attention of a woman, Dorothy Lay. Now, Dorothy is
one of the heirs to the Lay, as in Frito-Lay and PepsiCo Corporation. So a very wealthy
family. Dorothy was very interested in this technology specifically as it applied to
victims. And so she approached me at one point and asked if I would become a
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 42 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SU
E COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
s setting up to deal with
member of her board of Oectors for a non-profit that she
these kinds of technologies. And I've got to think about whether I should tell you the
rest of this story, and I think I will, because why not?
So I have this thing, intuition. All of us have it. I used to not pay as much attention to it
as I do today. When my intuition tells me something, I listen, because when I really
think about it, it's never been wrong. Neither has yours, if you really think about it. Or
and
maybe you don't think about it and just start acting on it. So my intuition said
this was a very difficult time for me in 2002. In 2002, I had been betrayed by a very
good friend, economically was bankrupt in the middle of this work, because I started
this work in '94. Economically was being crushed. And at that point I was deciding
whether I was going to stay in this work at all.
--
And I'm going through a bunch of my files and I see this file and it's marked Lay. And I
remember this person had contacted us needing some information and we provided it.
And we never charge for that. I mean, the way we operated is, I sold books. And
people like you bought my books. And they allowed me to do this work. I didn't write
for grants where somebody could manipulate me and control me and tell me what to
say. I didn't go out and find some publisher that would edit out my work. I risked my
own money. I published my book."
in 28 §2242 as prescribed by law, The PRO SE PLAINTIFF alleges violations
according to the 1867 interpretation of the federal Habeus CORPUS statutes which
states: "where any person may be restrained of his or her liberty in violation of the
constitution, or of any treaty or law of the United States."
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 43 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Cas 0. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
REMOTE NEURAL MONI RING:
HOW THEY SPY ON YOUR THOUGHTS
Remote Neural Monitoring: How They Spy on Your Thoughts
THIS LINKS
-
Anonymous
-
CLICK ON
How many times did you have thoughts that you never wanted to share with anyone,
and have been constantly worried at the thought of someone ever finding out about
these thoughts?
All of us have been through this process, and the new and improved technologies being
developed around the world, supposedly to deal with crime and terrorism, and
inadvertently intrude on one's privacy, should probably bring us all to the brink of
paranoia.
These technologies are funded by governments at the highest level and some of the
countries involved include USA, UK, Spain, Germany and France.
Recently, the infamous National Security Agency (NSA) of the U.S.A. has developed a
very efficient method of controlling the human brain.
https: / /youtu.be /ZBsIsLRHCEw
EDWARD SNOWDEN IN 2014 INTERVIEW WITH NBC NEWS BRIAN WILLIAMS
DISCLOSING NSA'S REMOTE NEURAL MONITORING PROGRAM LIVE ON THE AIR
https://youtu.be/ZBsIsLRHCEw
This technology is called Remote Neural Monitoring (R.N.M.) and is expected to
revolutionize crime detection and investigation.
R.N.M. works remotely (ever wondered why have we all been driven relentlessly
towards wireless systems?) to control the brain under the objective to detect any
criminal thought taking place inside the mind of a possible culprit. Inevitable question:
How can you isolate a criminal thought if you do not have a comparative measure of
non-criminal thoughts?
This undertaking is based on two principles:
• The research studies have shown that the humanoid intellect thinks at a speed of
about 5 kilobits per second and, therefore, does not have the capability to contest
with supercomputers acting via satellites, implants and biotelemetry.
• The human brain has a characteristic set of bioelectric resonance structure. By
using supercomputers, the R.N.M. system can home in on it, and send messages
through an embedded individual's nervous system in order to affect their
performance in a preferred way.
The entire system has been developed after about 50 years (!) of neuroelectromagnetic human experimentations, claimed to be involuntary, but there is no
evidence to support this claim. According to many scientists involved in this program
(their names are not revealed for obvious reasons), within a few years it is expected
that DNA microchips, under the guise of medical breakthroughs that will be presented
to launch the disease cure processes on speed and efficiency, will be implanted in the
humanoid cereberum, which would make it inherently controllable. R.N.M. will then
have the ability to read and govern a person's emotional mental procedures along with
the involuntary and visions.
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 44 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case 0. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
millions of people at the
Id, supercomputers are watchu
At present, around the
same time, with the speed of 20 terabits per second, particularly in countries like USA,
Japan, Israel and a number of European countries. A similar program is supposedly
under way in Russia.
How does R.N.M. work? It employs a set of programs functioning at different levels,
like:
The signals intelligence system which applies electromagnetic frequencies (EMF),
to excite the brain for the system and the electronic brain link (EBL).
The Brain Stimulation system that has been planned as particle emission
intelligence, which means receiving information from unintentionally created
electromagnetic waves in the environment. However, it is not related to
radioactivity or nuclear detonation.
The recording machines that have electronic equipment to examine electrical
action in human beings from afar. This computer-generated brain charting can
always record all electrical events in the cerebrum.
The recording aid system deciphers individual brain maps for security purposes.
The underlining technology of this system takes under consideration that the electrical
activity in the speech center of the brain, can be translated into the subject's verbal
thoughts. R.N.M. can send encrypted signals to the audio cortex of the brain directly
circumventing the ear. This encoding assists in detecting audio communication. It can
also perform electrical mapping of the cerebrum's activity from the visual center,
which is achieved by avoiding the eyes and optic nerves, consequently projecting
imageries from the subject's mind onto a video display. With this visual and audio
memory, both can be visualized and analyzed.
The machinery involved can, remotely and non-evasively, detect information by
digitally decoding the evoked potentials in 30-50Hz, 5 mW electromagnetic emissions
from the cerebrum. Evoked potentials are called the spikes and patterns created by the
nerves, as they produce a shifting electrical pattern with an ever-changing magnetic
instability, which then puts on a constant amount of electromagnetic waves. The
interesting part about this is that the entire exercise is carried out without any physical
contact with the subject.
The EMF emissions can be decoded into current thoughts and audiovisual perception, in
the subject's gumption. It sends complicated cyphers and electromagnetic pulse
signals to activate evoked potentials inside the mind, consequently generating sound
and visual input in the neural circuits. With its speech, auditory and visual
communication arrays, R.N.M. allows for a comprehensive audio-visual mind-to-mind
connection or a mind-to-computer association.
The mechanism needs to decrypt the resonance frequency of each specific site to
modulate the input of information in that specific location of the cerebrum.
Furthermore, R.N.M. can detect audio via microwaves, and features the broadcast of
precise directives into the subconscious, producing visual disorders, illusions and
instillation of words and numbers into the brain through radiation waves.
With all the given paybacks for tracing the unlawful and traitorous activities, there are
many alarms and dangers being pointed out by human rights advocates and scientists.
The agencies of human rights, worldwide, have criticized the system as an affront to
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 45 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
the basic human rights
and events of life.
ause it violates privacy and Adignity of considerations
Several countries have opposed it and refer to it as an offence on their human and civil
rights. Along with other biological concerns voiced by scientists, R.N.M. remains a
controversial technology, which is being used in many countries for security
maintenance and surveillance.
References:
Robert C. Gunn, PhD, Arbor, Michigan, NSA clinical psychologist currently indicted
for human and Constitutional rights violations of Mind Control. Extracts from the
passage of the affidavit of the indictment. Declassified documents by NSA of the
MKULTRA project R.G. Malech Patent #3951134 "Apparatus and method for
remotely monitoring and altering brain waves" USPTO granted 4/20/76
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 46 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Cas o. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
FOIA MILITARY and INTELLIGENCE REPORTS OF U.S. SPONSORED MIND
CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES
SCAN NIGHTLINE MAY 23, 1991
Legal Implications of the 1959 Soviet Microwave Bombardment of the U.S
Embassy January 17, 2017
Air Force Instruction 90-401,13IRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS SAFETY September
22, 2017
Defense Intelligence Manual & ABC News Nightline on Remote Viewing May 6,
2010
DefenseNews Story by Joe Pitts ELECTROMAGNETIC Weapons and Founder of the
Electronic Warfare Working Group for Securing Weapons of the Future
Electromagnetic pulse (Weapons) threat to be analyzed By Navy Sea Systems
Command April 3, 2010
Electromagnetic Weapons Transcript by CNN in 1985
Electronic Warfare Report by GAO to Armed Service Committee With
ELECTROMAGNETIC WEAPONS CENTER of 2012
Report Nonlethal Weapons Could Target Brain; Mimic Pschizophrenia Febraury
18, 2008
-
REPORT by NATIONAL DEFENSE INTELLEGENCE AGENCY re INTERROGATION
U.S. SPONSORED MIND CONTROL from WIKILEAKS by Advanced Media Group
October 27, 2016
-
US Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 47 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Cas o. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
Patents
..
. .
:.
Publication number US3951134 A
Grant
Publication type
Application number
US 05/494,518
Publication date
Apr 20, 1976
Filing date
Aug 5, 1974
Priority date
Aug 5, 1974
Inventors
Robert G. Malech
Original Assignee
Dome & Margolin Inc.
Export Citation
BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
Patent Citations (8), Referenced by (23),
Classifications (10)
External
Espacenet
Links: USPTO,
USPTO
Assignment,
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to apparatus and a method for monitoring brain waves wherein all
components of the apparatus employed are remote from the test subject. More specifically, high
frequency transmitters are operated to radiate electromagnetic energy of different frequencies
through antennas which are capable of scanning the entire brain of the test subject or any
desired region thereof. The signals of different frequencies penetrate the skull of the subject
and impinge upon the brain where they mix to yield an interference wave modulated by
radiations from the brain's natural electrical activity. The modulated interference wave is retransmitted by the brain and received by an antenna at a remote station where it is
demodulated, and processed to provide a profile of the suject's brain waves. In addition to
passively monitoring his brain waves, the subject's neurological processes may be affected by
transmitting to his brain, through a transmitter, compensating signals. The latter signals can be
derived from the received and processed brain waves.
OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION
It is therefore an object of the invention to remotely monitor electrical activity in the entire
brain or selected local regions thereof with a single measurement.
Another object is the monitoring of a subject's brain wave activity through transmission and
reception of electromagnetic waves.
Still another object is to monitor brain wave activity from a position remote from the subject.
A further object is to provide a method and apparatus for affecting brain wave activity by
transmitting electromagnetic signals thereto.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Other and further objects of the invention will appear from the following description and the
accompanying drawings, which form part of the instant specification and which are to be read
in conjunction therewith, and in which like reference numerals are used to indicate like parts in
the various views;
FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the interconnection of the components of the apparatus of
the invention;
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 48 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Gas o. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
ARGUMENT THREE
THE CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY
STAN J. CATERBONE AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP HAVE JUST COMPLETED A
MORE THOUGROUGH ANALYSIS OF THE EVENTS SURROUNDING THE CRIMINAL
EXTORTION AND CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY OF 1987. This analysis centers around the
extortion of Financial Management Group, Ltd., and all other associated business
interests. The recent announcement of the retirement of U.S. Federal Judge Lawrence
Stengel and the subsequent announcement of the Lancaster-based law firm Saxton &
Stump encouraged the new analysis. This is the type of firm that STAN J. CATERBONE
and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP would have retained under normal circumstances.
-.
•
'LThe announcement and related news article in the Lancaster
Newspaper reads "Retired judge announces plan to lead
f projects, Stengel to spearhead mediation, investigations for
I L ancaster firm
7-T
- ,,
-.
-
"Four days after his retirement from the federal bench,
Judge Lawrence F. Stengel announced Tuesday he will lead
a new mediation center and internal investigations practice
at the Lancaster-based law firm Saxton & Stump. Stengel
stepped down Friday after 14 years as a U.S. District Court judge
and his final year
as chief judge
in
Pennsylvania's nine-county Eastern District. He previously
served on the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas for 14 years before his federal
appointment in 2004. "This is an exciting new direction. As much as I loved my career
as a judge,
and I truly did love it
my work was in Philadelphia, and my home is
here," said Stengel, 66. "I am very happy to re-engage in the Lancaster community."
-
-
-
-
The analysis begins with the Preliminary Hearing
history
Transcript
of October 2, 1987 for the criminal charges lodged by
seri-et
the
the Detective Larry Mathias, (a known member of the Masonic
of ha
Lodge) and the Manheim Township Police Department and the
\TI1ite IOILS
1 Lancaster County District Attorney Office of September 2, 1987.
•
illegally
j On a side note; Detective Larry Mathias later joined the
U11DC(I IflIC1
Lancaster County District Attorney's Office.
The criminal
charges were a blatant attempt to cover-up the fraud
allegations of International Signal and Control, Plc., or ISC and
as a means of extorting the business interests from Stan J.
Caterbone, including but not limited to Financial Management
Group, Ltd., After the merger of ISC and Ferranti of England
were completed in late 1987, all of the criminal charges were dismissed prior to any
proceedings since the preliminary hearing.
.
______•
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 49 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP
E COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Cas a. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
In 1989 the British Press rep ed LONDON
"Ferranti
International Signal PLC, Britians third-largest defense
contractor, has been conned out of millions of dollars in false
or inflated contracts when it purchased a Pennsylvania-based
arms manufacturer two years ago", a company spokesman said
Monday.
-
--
Analysts said the scandal could leave Ferranti insolvent.'One
analyst predicted a rescue bid, perhaps led by the British
government, and the likely removal of top management who
approved the acquisition.
The scandal has raised questions of whether Ferranti can survice as an independent
company. Defense contractors Thomson-CSF of France and Daimler-Benz AG of West
Germany are reported to be the front runners attempting to acquire Ferranti.
On Friday, Ferranti, whose share trading was suspended a week ago as its financial
troubles became public, said it suspected 'significant irregularities' in overseas
contracts of ISC Technologies and called in a new accounting firm, Coopers & Lybrand
to investigate.
Ferranti believed it had been misled about the value of contracts by International
Signal and Control Technologies, the Lancaster, Pa. company it acquired for $654
million in November 1987.
Losses of $233 million to $311 million are being quoted in British newspapers, but
Ferranti did not release any estimate."
Years later, in 1996 the book titled "THE SECRET HISTORY OF HW THE WHITE
HOUSE ILLEGALLY ARMED IRAQ
SPIDERS WEB" the ful! breath of the scandal is laid
out and the complex web of what transpires when the interests of national security
conflict with the politics of the day. James Geurin should never have been indicted in
the first place. ISC was an instrument of foreign police. Consider the fact that the
sales of weapons, no mater who they were sold to, being they were covert operations
had to be omitted from the accounting books of' the public ISC corporation, thus
simultaneously defrauding shareholders, which Stan J. Caterbone was since 1983, and
Ferranti. Remember, Great Britian was one of the United States closes allies, and the
premise that M15 was not part of the integrate scheme is not very credible. Excerpts
from the book follow:
-
'Guerin filled the ranks of ISC with former military and intelligence officers, talking all
the time of the multinational colossus he planned to create. In his relentless drive to
make money and attach some importance to his life, he was willing to call in favors
wherever he could. He was also prepared to break the law. In 1975, he began selling
defense goods to South Africa, in violation of the longstanding UN arms embargo that
had been imposed because of the country's regime of apartheid. The United States was
observing the embargo at the time, but this did not matter to Guerin. One day in 1975,
he called an aide to his office and told him he wanted to procure a variety of electronic
components and arrange theft shipment to South Africa. By hook or by crook,
International Signal and Control was finally going to live up to its name by achieving
sales outside the United States. The South Africans, Guerin told his aide, were "fed up"
dealing with European distributors of defense electronics; ISC would now take the
lead.
"The Secret History of How The White House Illegally Armed Iraq
December 1993
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 50 of 77
-
SPIDERS WEB" by Alan Friedman
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUf E COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case o. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
What he did not tell his employee was the reason he felt able to go about breaking
American export laws so cavalierly. That year, James Guerin struck a deal with the
government of the United States; he had entered the world of espionage and found a
way to ship goods to South Africa.
In 1975, working closely with Admiral Bobby Ray Inman, then the director of naval
intelligence, Guerin became a trusted covert operator for the Ford administration. The
United States wanted to spy on Soviet ships off South Africa's coast, and the plan was
to have Guerin ship advanced electronic sensors, optics, and related goods to South
Africa in an intelligence venture that would supply the listening posts at the
Simontown naval station, off the Cape of Good Hope, with what it needed. Despite the
official U.S. policy of seeking to isolate Pretoria, the leaders of both countries shared a
fervent anti-Soviet sentiment. Business between the two could thus be rationalized in
terms of the need to fight the cold war. In exchange for the electronics technology,
Pretoria agreed to share the information it had on Soviet ships and submarines with
Washington.
Admiral Inman was the most prominent intelligence official to work with Guerin on
the clandestine operation, which was code-named Project X. "ISC had the South
African connection," Inman later confirmed. But Guerin's institutional partner in the
covert operation was the National Security Agency (NSA), the secretive American
electronic surveillance agency.
In order to facilitate ISC's shipments to South Africa while conceal-ing the hand of the
American government in the operation, the NSA helped Guerin set up a front company
called Gamma Systems Associates. Gamma was not really a company at all; it was just
the address of an office located in the Jamaica, Queens, section of New York City, near
Kennedy International Airport, used mainly to generate shipping records. In the
jargon of the intelligence world, Gamma was a mail and phone drop, a destination
through which ISC could send equipment before the goods were shipped out from
New York aboard airliners bound for South Africa.
Guerin set up a specially walled-off area at ISC's headquarters in Lancaster that did
nothing but liaise with intelligence contacts in Washington, procure goods for Gamma,
and arrange for their delivery to the address near Kennedy airport. No one was
allowed to enter the restricted zone without authorization from Guerin, and those
given such authorization had to tap a special code into a lock on the door. Former
colleagues recalled that as Project X developed between 1975 and 1977, Guerin
seemed to relish the intrigue almost as much as the profits derived from his sales to
South Africa. While to his neighbors in Lancaster, Guerin . seemed the perfect family
man, singing in his local church choir and always generous when it came to civic
causes, he was actually becoming something of a Jekyll and Hyde figure. The select
group ofISC executives who were party to Project X watched his ego grow by the day,
along with his penchant for the twilight world of spies.
0n June 8, less than a week after the Brooks committee met, it emerged that back in
April, Admiral Bobby Ray Inman, a top intelligence adviser to President Bush, had
written a letter to a judge in Philadelphia trying to win a lighter prison sentence for
James Guerin, the arms-maker from Lancaster, Pennsylvania. Guerin had already
been convicted of a $1 billion fraud and of illegally transferring military technology to
2
2
"The Secret History of How The White House Illegally Armed Iraq
Friedman December 1993
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 51 of 77
-
SPIDERS WEB" by Alan
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Cas o. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
South Africa and Iraq.
Inman, who had been CIA de
director until 1982 and
was now serving as the acting chairman of the president's foreign intelligence
advisory board, called Guerin a patriot and revealed in the letter to the judge that he
had worked secretly in the mid-1970s with intelligence agencies. That was the period
when Bush had been CIA director. The fact that an intelligence official as prominent
as Inman, albeit one who had once served on Guerin's proxy board, was willing to
engage in special pleading for a convicted fraudster, raised further concern among
Iraqgate investigators. (See Appendix B, page 354.)
The pressure was building on George Bush himself, especially after Brooks's Judiciary
Committee sent a letter to the White House seeking the testimony of Boyden Gray,
Nicholas Rostow, and Frank Lemay, the whistle-blower from the State Department
who had tried to warn his superiors of the suspected use of u.S. government loan
guarantees in Saddam's nuclear weapons arsenal in 1989. The General Accounting
Office had already told Gonzalez's Banking Committee that its requests for the Iraq
papers had been delayed and thwarted by the Rostow group.
By inviting Gray and Rostow, officials with personal knowledge of how the White
House had coordinated its response to congressional investigations, the Judiciary
Committee seemed to be sending a message: The same committee that had led the
congressional charge in the Watergate affair was now focusing on the possibility that
the Bush administration had moved to cover up actions in order to limit political
damage.
Iraqgate was beginning to follow the president wherever he went.
.
-
±L
-
:'
Back to the CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY, in 1992 Stengel
presided over one of the biggest cases in Lancaster County
The Lisa Michelle Lambert case. Stan J. Caterbone
history
filed an amicus brief on the case in 2015 and took the case to
the U.S. Supreme Court as the Movant on Lisa Michelle
.
.Lambert's 2014 Habeus Corpus case. Judge Stengel was a high
school teacher at Lancaster Catholic High School during Stan J.
11
'
L Caterbone's high school years and is now married to the sister
of Daniel Berger, an associate that Stan J. Caterbone recruited
as the Real Estate professional for Financial Management Group,
.
Ltd., in 1986.
-
-
-.
.1
•
•i
•
i
.".
'
:
-
The analysis illustrates the complex and the longstanding
11egations by Stan 3. Caterbone that the criminal conspiracy
hat began in earnest in 1987 has never ceased and continues to
w
tooday. It is especially being executed in the current STALKING
case brought by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the Lancaster County District
Attorney Office, and the Lancaster City Police Department.
lo
The following case law is evident of the fact that this analysis is accurate and fall
within the legal boundaries of both federal and state statutes.
• In the case of United States v. Holck, 389 F. Supp. 2d. 338, criminal responsibility
defines single or multiple conspiracies by the following: "Governments, without
committing variance between single conspiracy charges in an indictment and it's
proof at trial may establish existence at continuing core conspiracy which
attracts different members at different times and which involves different
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 52 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-1 0134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
acts in furtherance of an over plan". This illustrates the
subgroups committ
legal analysis of the 1987 conspiracy to cover-up the International Signal &
Control, Plc., whistle blowing activities.
• Under Pennsylvania Law, conspiracy may be proved by circumstantial evidence
that is by acts and circumstances sufficient to warrant an inference that the
unlawful combination has been in front of facts formed for the purpose charged.
See Waicker v. North Wales Boro, 395 F. Supp. 2d. 219. In the same case the
following was supported: "Arrestee's allegations that the township (Conestoga)
and it's police officers were acting in concert and conspiracy and with the
purpose of violating arrestee's constitutional rights by subjecting him to
unreasonable force, arrest, search, and malicious prosecution and the two (2) or
more officers acted together in throwing arrestee to the ground (April 51h 2006
and August 4th, 2006) and forcing him to take two (2) blood tests and holding
him in custody". The preceding pleaded civil conspiracy claims under
Pennsylvania Law.
• The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (commonly referred to
as RICO) is a United States federal law which provides for extended penalties for
criminal acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization. RICO was
enacted by section 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, Pub. L. No.
91-452, 84 Stat. 922 (Oct. 15, 1970). RICO is codified as Chapter 96 of Title 18 of
the United States Code, 18 U.S.C. § 1961 through 18 U.S.C. § 1968.
• Under RICO, a person or group who commits any two of 35 crimes-27 federal
crimes and 8 state crimes—within a 10-year period and, in the opinion of the US
Attorney bringing the case, has committed those crimes with similar purpose or
results can be charged with racketeering. Those found guilty of racketeering can
be fined up to $25,000 and/or sentenced to 20 years in prison. In addition, the
racketeer must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business gained
through a pattern of "racketeering activity." The act also contains a civil
component that allows plaintiffs to sue for triple damages. When the U.S.
Attorney decides to indict someone under RICO, he has the option of seeking a
pre-trial restraining order or injunction to prevent the transfer of potentially
forfeitable property, as well as require the defendant to put up a performance
bond. This provision is intended to force a defendant to plead guilty before
indictment. There is also a provision for private parties to sue. A "person
damaged in his business or property" can sue one or more "racketeers." There
must also be an "enterprise." The defendant(s) are not the enterprise, in other
words, the defendant(s) and the enterprise are not one and the same. There
must be one of four specified relationships between the defendant(s) and the
enterprise. This lawsuit, like all Federal civil lawsuits, can take place in either
Federal or State court.
All of the above proves the underlying allegation that the Lancaster County District
Attorney's Office is a bona-fide CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE that now could definitely face
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, ANTI-TRUST, AND FEDERAL RICO charges. The same
would be true of the Manhiem Township and Lancaster City Police Departments.
In 18 U.S.C. § 1503 OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE is defined by the CORNELL
www.law.cornell.edu/wex/obstruction_ofjustice as follows:
LAW SCHOOL
-
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 53 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
"whoever .......corr ly or by threats or force, or Oany threatening letter or
communication, influences, obstruct, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct,
or impede, the due administration of justice, shall be (guilty of an offense)." Persons
are charged under this statute based on allegations that a defendant intended to
interfere with an official proceeding, by doing thins such as destroying evidence, or
interfering with duties of jurors or court officers.
A person obstruct justice when they have a specific intent to obstruct or interfere
with a judicial proceeding. (ALL COURT CASES, BOTH CIVIL AND CRIMINAL OF
PLAINTIFF STAN J. CATERBONE) For a person to be convicted of obstruction justice,
they must not only have the specific intent to obstruct the proceeding, both the person
must know (1) that a proceeding was actually pending at the time; and (2) there must
be a nexus between the defendant's endeavor to obstruct justice and the proceeding,
and the defendant must have knowledge of this nexus.
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 54 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
THE STAN J. CATERBO AND ISC CONNECTION Sinc 987, Stanley). Caterbone
has been the victim of vast civil conspiracy that started in 1987 to cover-up allegations
of fraud within International Signal & Control during the negotiations and merger of
International Signal & Control and Ferranti International of England. Stanley J.
Caterbone alleges that warrantless surveillance was used to obstruct justice and moot
his constitutional rights in an effort to divert attention away from his allegations of
fraud within International Signal & Control back in 1987, and afterwards to the present
as a means to deny his access to the courts for remedy and relief, and Federal False
Claims Act violations. The business of Advanced Media Group has been greatly
compromised and intellectual property stolen during the late 1980's and early 1990's
that included information technology contracts with the United States Government.
-
IS LANCASTER COUNTY GROUND ZERO FOR ELECTROMAGNETIC WEAPON ATTACKS,
COVERT SURVEILLANCE, AND ORGANIZED STALKING GROUPS?
The links to ISC and Lancaster, Pennsylvania and U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
comes through ISC Board of Directors, Former Director of the NSA, and The Director of
U.S. Naval Intelligence Admiral Bobby Ray Inman. One must remember that the U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control Programs were the direct result of the Soviet Unions
accomplishments of using Microwave Technologies to bombard the U.S. Embassy in
Moscow as early the 1950's and the use of German Psychiatrists by Adolf Hitler in the
1940's. Both the German and Soviet Mind Control Programs predate that of the United
States. Thus, the beginning of the Mind Control Arms Race. Just this year, the Trump
Administration introduced the NEW MILITARY SPACE AGENCY, in an effort to formalize
the weaponization of Space and Microwave Weapons under one agency. This will
convert the Department of Defense programs and that of the U. S. Intelligence
Agencies to this new Military Space Agency, in my opinion.
Lancaster County's U.S. Representative Joe Pitts was instrumental in these
efforts in his work on the Electronic Warfare Working Group. This is documented in
Congressman Pitt's article of the same.
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 55 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
0
Brief History Of MK-Ultra
CIA Program On Mind Control
By Tom Porter @1996
All Rights Reserved
S.A.LC. involvement in 1993 American Parapsychological Association meeting arrangements,
via their 'Cognitive Sciences Laboratory'. Science Applications International Corporation is a big
time defense contractor, has held the largest number of research contracts of any defense
contractor. Bobby Ray Inman is on its board of directors, among others.
Started during WWII with research on hypnosis for interrogation, secure courier duties,
and reducing fatigue. Also research into effects of primitive drugs like barbiturates and
cannabis as far as drugassisted interrogation goes.
George Estabrooks was the leading proponent of hypnosis as the be-all and end-all of
manipulating peoples minds. His book, 'Hypnotism', published in the early forties, has been
decried as too fantastic and improbable in terms of describing the capabilities of hypnosis with
certain very suggestible subjects,
but his arguments and examples remain valid to this day.
Start of Cold War and Korean War in particular gave a big boost to mind control research
with the emergence of 'Brain Washing' as a common term. Supposedly a development of the
dastardly Chi-Coms, the term was actually coined by a magazine writer later found to be on the
CIA payroll as an agent of influence. Postulating a 'brainwashing gap' The CIA got the go-ahead
for research into countering communist mind control efforts and developing their own to aid in
the espionage wars.
Hypnosis, drugs, and psycho-surgery; separately and combined, were the tools of this
quest for the ultimate truth serum on the one hand, and the capability to create an agent who
could not have his or her mission tortured out of them, or even be aware that they were
carrying secret information given to them in an altered state of consciousness. More and more
sophisticated drugs were experimented with, such as LSD, Ketamine, and Psilocybine.
Lobotomy and the implantation of electrodes were considered as methods for creating a
compliant agent. Electro-Convulsive Shock, combined with LSD, sedation for days at a time, and
constantly replaying the patient's own voice through helmet-mounted headphones was a
notorious Canadian researcher's recipe for mind control.
One of the most remarkable cases of mind control involves a famous model of the late
40's and 50's named Candy Jones. In the book, "The Control of Candy Jones" the author
reviewed hours of tapes made by Candy Jones and her husband which revealed a systematic
program to create and manipulate alter personalities as the foundation for programmed
couriers resistant to torture, where the primary personality would not even be aware of the
secret information being carried. The information could be summoned forth via a post-hypnotic
command or response to a pre-programmed cue.
Research continued into early 70's by CIA's own admission during the Church hearings.
John Marks, author of the best study of CIA mind control experiments, makes the subtle
differentiation that the CIA congressional witnesses might truthfully say that all research done
by the TSS Directorate had ended, since the programs were moved into other areas once
operational techniques had been developed. Many of the names mentioned in reference to mind
control research turn up in the few references to supposed dead-end research in ESP.
Brief History Of MK-Ultra
There have been persistent rumors of Navy research involving attempts at telepathy from
submarines under water, the Nautilus being the most famous of these. Detection of enemy
submarines, and communicating with our own, has continued to be an important area of
conventional research for the Navy, so it is no surprise that researching the use of ESP for these
purposes would be of interest.
U.S. SUPREME COURT PETITION OF CERTORARI
Page No. 56 of 77
Saturday November 10, 2018
TO THE U.S. SUP ME COURT From THE ELVENTH CIRCUIT Cas
o. 18-10134, by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
Communicating with a submerged submarine is the only kind of communications where
the very act of receiving puts the receiver in danger, since submarines must normally stick an
antenna out of the water for high speed radio traffic, or rely on trailing a long wire antenna
under water relatively near the surface to receive very slow speed traffic using ELF radio waves.
Newer techniques may involve the use of blue-green wavelength lasers, but evidently
penetration to any depth is still a problem.
If you look at telepathy as a problem in the transfer of information in a very noisy
environment, then certain existing solutions suggest themselves: There have already been
experiments in the transmission of five distinct symbols via telepathy, namely Zener card
symbols. I suggest that there is already a way of transmitting information using two symbols
only, namely Morse Code. Current ELF or VLF radio transmission methods for communicating
with fleet ballistic missile submarines to issue them their launch orders involve very low data
transfer rates, on the order of 3 to 30 bits per minute, if I am not mistaken. Messages are very
short, consisting of pre-formulated action or targeting codes. I suggest that telepathic 'Zener
Morse' is an operational technique for information transfer under severe signal to noise
conditions. In fact the use of five Zener symbols would increase data transfer rates, but at the
expense of a higher error rate due to the problems in discriminating between five and just two
symbols.
CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS AND REPORTS
Reports of Project SCANNATE in 70's, most likely done by Swann, since his method for RV
is very similar to that reportedly used in this project; namely providing latitude and longitude
coordinates and telling what is there. Later changed to assigning random number for unique
session number and Swann picked up location anyway.
"The New Age Army:" Over the past 10 15 years a number of military personnel, most in
significant positions in Military Intelligence, have expressed interest in and directed programs
or projects that have explored paranormal activities and capabilities. Several government
studies on Enhancing Human Performance took place during this time. Most, if not all of them,
were savaged in the NRC study on Enhancing Human Performance, but recent critiques and
rebuttals of this study have indicated severe irregularities in the evaluation procedures for
papers submitted to the NRC study, suppression of favorable results, and a definitely one-sided
evaluation panel.
-
Much modern research in parapsychology tends to support the idea that Enhanced
Perception is a survival-related trait from our distant past, not the tip of the iceberg as far as
new emerging human powers go. This is supported by the observation that many psychic
episodes center around catastrophic or traumatic events. Studies of Siberian and Eskimo
shamans also show the development of ESP or similar shamanic powers due to injury, exposure
This text is long and has been trimmed here. Open the source document for the complete record.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.