Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Arnold Bennett Caldwell, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court briefNov 19, 2018
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
APPENDIX
United States Code Title 18
Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Part I. Crimes
Chapter 109B. Sex Offender and Crimes Against
Children Registry
18 U.S.C. § 2250. Failure to register
Effective: February 8, 2016
(a) In general.--Whoever-(1) is required to register under the Sex Offender
Registration and Notification Act;
(2) (A) is a sex offender as defined for the purposes
of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification
Act by reason of a conviction under Federal law
(including the Uniform Code of Military Justice),
the law of the District of Columbia, Indian tribal
law, or the law of any territory or possession of the
United States; or
(B) travels in interstate or foreign commerce, or
enters or leaves, or resides in, Indian country;
and
(3) knowingly fails to register or update a
registration as required by the Sex Offender
Registration and Notification Act;
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more
than 10 years, or both.
(b) International
Whoever--
travel
reporting
violations.--
(1) is required to register under the Sex Offender
Registration and Notification Act (42 U.S.C. 16901
et seq.);
1a
(2) knowingly fails to provide information required
by the Sex Offender Registration and Notification
Act relating to intended travel in foreign
commerce; and
(3) engages or attempts to engage in the intended
travel in foreign commerce;
shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more
than 10 years, or both.
(c) Affirmative defense.--In a prosecution for a
violation under subsection (a) or (b), it is an
affirmative defense that-(1) uncontrollable circumstances prevented the
individual from complying;
(2) the individual did not contribute to the
creation of such circumstances in reckless
disregard of the requirement to comply; and
(3) the individual complied as soon as such
circumstances ceased to exist.
(d) Crime of violence.-(1) In general.--An individual described in
subsection (a) or (b) who commits a crime of
violence under Federal law (including the Uniform
Code of Military Justice), the law of the District of
Columbia, Indian tribal law, or the law of any
territory or possession of the United States shall
be imprisoned for not less than 5 years and not
more than 30 years.
(2) Additional punishment.--The punishment
provided in paragraph (1) shall be in addition and
consecutive to the punishment provided for the
violation described in subsection (a) or (b).
2a
Title 34. Crime Control and Law Enforcement
Subtitle II. Protection of Children and
Other Persons
Chapter 209. Child Protection and Safety
Subchapter I. Sex Offender Registration
and Notification
Effective: September 1, 2017
*
*
*
34 U.S.C. § 20901. Declaration of purpose
In order to protect the public from sex offenders and
offenders against children, and in response to the
vicious attacks by violent predators against the
victims listed below, Congress in this chapter
establishes a comprehensive national system for the
registration of those offenders . . . .
*
*
*
34 U.S.C. § 20911. Relevant definitions, including
Amie Zyla expansion of sex offender definition and
expanded inclusion of child predators
In this subchapter the following definitions apply:
(1) Sex offender:
The term “sex offender” means an individual who
was convicted of a sex offense.
(2) Tier I sex offender
The term “tier I sex offender” means a sex offender
other than a tier II or tier III sex offender.
3a
(3) Tier II sex offender
The term “tier II sex offender” means a sex
offender other than a tier III sex offender whose
offense is punishable by imprisonment for more
than 1 year and-(A) is comparable to or more severe than the
following offenses, when committed against a
minor, or an attempt or conspiracy to commit
such an offense against a minor:
(i) sex trafficking (as described in section
1591 of Title 18);
(ii) coercion and enticement (as described
in section 2422(b) of Title 18);
(iii) transportation with intent to engage in
criminal sexual activity (as described in
section 2423(a)) of Title 18;
(iv) abusive sexual contact (as described
in section 2244 of Title 18);
(B) involves-(i) use of a minor in a sexual performance;
(ii) solicitation of
prostitution; or
a
minor
to
(iii) production or
pornography; or
distribution
practice
of
child
(C) occurs after the offender becomes a tier I sex
offender.
(4) Tier III sex offender
The term “tier III sex offender” means a sex
offender whose offense is punishable by
imprisonment for more than 1 year and--
4a
(A) is comparable to or more severe than the
following offenses, or an attempt or conspiracy
to commit such an offense:
(i) aggravated sexual abuse or sexual abuse
(as described in sections 2241 and 2242 of
Title 18); or
(ii) abusive sexual contact (as described
in section 2244 of Title 18) against a minor
who has not attained the age of 13 years;
(B) involves kidnapping of a minor (unless
committed by a parent or guardian); or
(C) occurs after the offender becomes a tier II
sex offender.
(5) Amie Zyla expansion of sex offense definition
(A) Generally
Except as limited by subparagraph (B) or (C),
the term “ sex offense” means-(i) a criminal offense that has an element
involving a sexual act or sexual contact with
another;
(ii) a criminal offense that is a specified
offense against a minor;
(iii) a Federal offense (including an offense
prosecuted under section 1152 or 1153 of
Title 18) under section 1591, or chapter 109A,
110 (other than section 2257, 2257A, or
2258), or 117, of Title 18;
(iv) a military offense specified by the
Secretary of Defense under section
5a
115(a)(8)(C)(i) of Public Law 105-119 (10
U.S.C. 951); or
(v) an attempt or conspiracy to commit an
offense described in clauses (i) through (iv).
(B) Foreign convictions
A foreign conviction is not a sex offense for the
purposes of this subchapter if it was not
obtained with sufficient safeguards for
fundamental fairness and due process for the
accused under guidelines or regulations
established under section 20912 of this title.
(C) Offenses
conduct
involving
consensual
sexual
An offense involving consensual sexual conduct
is not a sex offense for the purposes of this
subchapter if the victim was an adult, unless
the adult was under the custodial authority of
the offender at the time of the offense, or if the
victim was at least 13 years old and the offender
was not more than 4 years older than the victim.
(6) Criminal offense
The term “criminal offense” means a State, local,
tribal, foreign, or military offense (to the extent
specified by the Secretary of Defense under section
115(a)(8)(C)(i) of Public Law 105-119 (10 U.S.C.
951 note)) or other criminal offense.
6a
(7) Expansion of definition of “specified offense
against a minor” to include all offenses by child
predators
The term “specified offense against a minor”
means an offense against a minor that involves
any of the following:
(A) An offense (unless committed by a parent or
guardian) involving kidnapping.
(B) An offense (unless committed by a parent or
guardian) involving false imprisonment.
(C) Solicitation to engage in sexual conduct.
(D) Use in a sexual performance.
(E) Solicitation to practice prostitution.
(F) Video voyeurism as described in section
1801 of Title 18.
(G) Possession, production, or distribution of
child pornography.
(H) Criminal sexual conduct involving a minor,
or the use of the Internet to facilitate or attempt
such conduct.
(I) Any conduct that by its nature is a sex
offense against a minor.
(8) Convicted as including certain juvenile
adjudications
The term “convicted” or a variant thereof, used
with respect to a sex offense, includes adjudicated
delinquent as a juvenile for that offense, but only
if the offender is 14 years of age or older at the time
of the offense and the offense adjudicated was
comparable to or more severe than aggravated
7a
sexual abuse (as described in section 2241 of Title
18), or was an attempt or conspiracy to commit
such an offense.
(9) Sex offender registry
The term “sex offender registry” means a registry
of sex offenders, and a notification program,
maintained by a jurisdiction.
(10) Jurisdiction
The term “jurisdiction” means any of the following:
(A) A State.
(B) The District of Columbia.
(C) The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
(D) Guam.
(E) American Samoa.
(F) The Northern Mariana Islands.
(G) The United States Virgin Islands.
(H) To the extent provided and subject to the
requirements of section 20929 of this title, a
federally recognized Indian tribe.
(11) Student
The term “student” means an individual who
enrolls in or attends an educational institution,
including (whether public or private) a secondary
school, trade or professional school, and institution
of higher education.
8a
(12) Employee
The term “employee” includes an individual who is
self-employed or works for any other entity,
whether compensated or not.
(13) Resides
The term “resides” means, with respect to an
individual, the location of the individual's home or
other place where the individual habitually lives.
(14) Minor
The term “minor” means an individual who has not
attained the age of 18 years.
*
*
*
34 U.S.C. § 20913. Registry requirements for sex
offenders
(a) In general
A sex offender shall register, and keep the registration
current, in each jurisdiction where the offender
resides, where the offender is an employee, and where
the offender is a student. For initial registration
purposes only, a sex offender shall also register in the
jurisdiction in which convicted if such jurisdiction is
different from the jurisdiction of residence.
(b) Initial registration
The sex offender shall initially register-(1) before completing a sentence of imprisonment
with respect to the offense giving rise to the
registration requirement; or
9a
(2) not later than 3 business days after being
sentenced for that offense, if the sex offender is not
sentenced to a term of imprisonment.
(c) Keeping the registration current
A sex offender shall, not later than 3 business days
after each change of name, residence, employment, or
student status, appear in person in at least 1
jurisdiction involved pursuant to subsection (a) and
inform that jurisdiction of all changes in the
information required for that offender in the sex
offender registry. That jurisdiction shall immediately
provide that information to all other jurisdictions in
which the offender is required to register.
(d) Initial registration of sex offenders unable to
comply with subsection (b)
The Attorney General shall have the authority to
specify the applicability of the requirements of this
subchapter to sex offenders convicted before the
enactment of this chapter or its implementation in a
particular jurisdiction, and to prescribe rules for the
registration of any such sex offenders and for other
categories of sex offenders who are unable to comply
with subsection (b).
(e) State penalty for failure to comply
Each jurisdiction, other than a Federally recognized
Indian tribe, shall provide a criminal penalty that
includes a maximum term of imprisonment that is
greater than 1 year for the failure of a sex offender to
comply with the requirements of this subchapter.
*
*
*
10a
34 U.S.C. § 20914. Information required
in registration
(a) Provided by the offender
The sex offender shall provide the following
information to the appropriate official for inclusion in
the sex offender registry:
(1) The name of the sex offender (including any
alias used by the individual).
(2) The Social Security number of the sex offender.
(3) The address of each residence at which the sex
offender resides or will reside.
(4) The name and address of any place where the
sex offender is an employee or will be an employee.
(5) The name and address of any place where the
sex offender is a student or will be a student.
(6) The license plate number and a description of
any vehicle owned or operated by the sex offender.
(7) Information relating to intended travel of the
sex offender outside the United States, including
any anticipated dates and places of departure,
arrival, or return, carrier and flight numbers for
air travel, destination country and address or
other contact information therein, means and
purpose of travel, and any other itinerary or other
travel-related information required by the
Attorney General.
(8) Any other information required by the Attorney
General.
11a
(b) Provided by the jurisdiction
The jurisdiction in which the sex offender registers
shall ensure that the following information is included
in the registry for that sex offender:
(1) A physical description of the sex offender.
(2) The text of the provision of law defining the
criminal offense for which the sex offender is
registered.
(3) The criminal history of the sex offender,
including the date of all arrests and convictions;
the status of parole, probation, or supervised
release; registration status; and the existence of
any outstanding arrest warrants for the sex
offender.
(4) A current photograph of the sex offender.
(5) A set of fingerprints and palm prints of the sex
offender.
(6) A DNA sample of the sex offender.
(7) A photocopy of a valid driver's license or
identification card issued to the sex offender by a
jurisdiction.
(8) Any other information required by the Attorney
General.
(c) Time and manner
A sex offender shall provide and update information
required under subsection (a), including information
relating to intended travel outside the United States
required under paragraph (7) of that subsection, in
conformity with any time and manner requirements
prescribed by the Attorney General.
12a
34 U.S.C. § 20915. Duration of registration
requirement
(a) Full registration period
A sex offender shall keep the registration current for
the full registration period (excluding any time the sex
offender is in custody or civilly committed) unless the
offender is allowed a reduction under subsection (b).
The full registration period is-(1) 15 years, if the offender is a tier I sex offender;
(2) 25 years, if the offender is a tier II sex offender;
and
(3) the life of the offender, if the offender is a tier
III sex offender.
(b) Reduced period for clean record
(1) Clean record
The full registration period shall be reduced as
described in paragraph (3) for a sex offender who
maintains a clean record for the period described
in paragraph (2) by-(A) not being convicted of any offense for which
imprisonment for more than 1 year may be
imposed;
(B) not being convicted of any sex offense;
(C) successfully completing any periods of
supervised release, probation, and parole; and
(D) successfully completing of an appropriate
sex offender treatment program certified by a
jurisdiction or by the Attorney General.
13a
(2) Period
In the case of-(A) a tier I sex offender, the period during which
the clean record shall be maintained is 10 years;
and
(B) a tier III sex offender adjudicated delinquent
for the offense which required registration in a
sex registry under this subchapter, the period
during which the clean record shall be
maintained is 25 years.
(3) Reduction
In the case of-(A) a tier I sex offender, the reduction is 5 years;
(B) a tier III sex offender adjudicated
delinquent, the reduction is from life to that
period for which the clean record under
paragraph (2) is maintained.
*
*
*
34 U.S.C. § 20916. Direction to the Attorney
General
(a) Requirement that sex offenders provide certain
Internet related information to sex offender
registries
The Attorney General, using the authority provided in
section 114(a)(7) of the Sex Offender Registration and
Notification Act, shall require that each sex offender
provide to the sex offender registry those Internet
identifiers the sex offender uses or will use of any type
that the Attorney General determines to be
appropriate under that Act. These records of Internet
14a
identifiers shall be subject to the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C.
552a) to the same extent as the other records in the
National Sex Offender Registry.
(b) Timeliness of reporting of information
The Attorney General, using the authority provided in
section 112(b) of the Sex Offender Registration and
Notification Act, shall specify the time and manner for
keeping current information required to be provided
under this section.
(c) Nondisclosure to general public
The Attorney General, using the authority provided in
section 118(b)(4) of the Sex Offender Registration and
Notification Act, shall exempt from disclosure all
information provided by a sex offender under
subsection (a).
(d) Notice to sex offenders of new requirements
The Attorney General shall ensure that procedures are
in place to notify each sex offender of changes in
requirements that apply to that sex offender as a
result of the implementation of this section.
(e) Definitions
(1) Of “social networking website”
As used in this Act, the term “social networking
website”-(A) means an Internet website-(i) that allows users, through the creation of
web pages or profiles or by other means, to
provide information about themselves that is
available to the public or to other users; and
15a
(ii)
that
offers
a
mechanism
for
communication with other users where such
users are likely to include a substantial
number of minors; and
(iii) whose primary purpose is to facilitate
online social interactions; and
(B) includes any contractors or agents used by
the website to act on behalf of the website in
carrying out the purposes of this Act.
(2) Of “Internet identifiers”
As used in this Act, the term “Internet identifiers”
means electronic mail addresses and other
designations used for self-identification or routing
in Internet communication or posting.
(3) Other terms
A term defined for the purposes of the Sex
Offender Registration and Notification Act has the
same meaning in this Act.
*
*
*
34 U.S.C. § 20918. Periodic in person verification
A sex offender shall appear in person, allow the
jurisdiction to take a current photograph, and
verify the information in each registry in which
that offender is required to be registered not less
frequently than-(1) each year, if the offender is a tier I sex offender;
(2) every 6 months, if the offender is a tier II sex
offender; and
16a
(3) every 3 months, if the offender is a tier III sex
offender.
*
*
*
34 U.S.C. § 20921. National Sex Offender Registry
(a) Internet
The Attorney General shall maintain a national
database at the Federal Bureau of Investigation for
each sex offender and any other person required to
register in a jurisdiction's sex offender registry. The
database shall be known as the National Sex Offender
Registry.
(b) Electronic forwarding
The Attorney General shall ensure (through the
National Sex Offender Registry or otherwise) that
updated information about a sex offender is
immediately transmitted by electronic forwarding to
all relevant jurisdictions.
*
*
*
34 U.S.C. § 20925. Development and availability of
registry management and website software
(a) Duty to develop and support
The Attorney General shall, in consultation with the
jurisdictions, develop and support software to enable
jurisdictions to establish and operate uniform sex
offender registries and Internet sites.
(b) Criteria
The software should facilitate--
17a
(1) immediate exchange of information among
jurisdictions;
(2) public access over the Internet to appropriate
information, including the number of registered
sex offenders in each jurisdiction on a current
basis;
(3) full compliance with the requirements of this
subchapter; and
(4) communication of information to community
notification program participants as required
under section 20923 of this title.
(c) Deadline
The Attorney General shall make the first complete
edition of this software available to jurisdictions
within 2 years of July 27, 2006.
*
*
*
34 U.S.C. § 20926. Period for implementation by
jurisdictions
(a) Deadline
Each jurisdiction shall implement this subchapter
before the later of-(1) 3 years after July 27, 2006; and
(2) 1 year after the date on which the software
described in section 20925 of this title is available.
(b) Extensions
The Attorney General may authorize up to two 1-year
extensions of the deadline.
*
*
*
18a
34 U.S.C. § 20927. Failure of jurisdiction to
comply
(a) In general
For any fiscal year after the end of the period for
implementation, a jurisdiction that fails, as
determined by the Attorney General, to substantially
implement this subchapter shall not receive 10 percent
of the funds that would otherwise be allocated for that
fiscal year to the jurisdiction under subpart 1 of part E
of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe
Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3750 et seq.).
*
*
*
34 U.S.C. § 20941. Federal assistance with respect
to violations of registration requirements
(a) In general
The Attorney General shall use the resources of
Federal law enforcement, including the United States
Marshals Service, to assist jurisdictions in locating
and apprehending sex offenders who violate sex
offender registration requirements. For the purposes
of section 566(e)(1)(B) of Title 28, a sex offender who
violates a sex offender registration requirement shall
be deemed a fugitive.
(b) Authorization of appropriations
There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as
may be necessary for fiscal years 2007 through 2009 to
implement this section.
*
*
*
19a
Case: 17-2062
Document: 30-2
Filed: 08/21/2018
Page: 1
(2 of 7)
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 18a0430n.06
CASE NO. 17-2062
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES of AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ARNOLD BENNETT CALDWELL,
Defendant-Appellant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
FILED
Aug 21, 2018
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk
ON APPEAL FROM THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT FOR THE WESTERN
DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Before: BATCHELDER, MOORE, and LARSEN, Circuit Judges.
ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. The defendant appeals the judgment entered
following his guilty plea to failure to register as a sex offender. We AFFIRM.
According to the PSR, back in the 1990’s, defendant Arnold Caldwell was living in
Tacoma, Washington, with his “common law wife,” Kitt Henderson. Henderson had a young niece
who frequently stayed with them at the residence. When the girl was six or seven years old,
Caldwell molested her; shortly thereafter, Caldwell entered her bedroom at night and raped her.
Caldwell continued to rape her every time she spent the night at the residence, which was “about
every other week” from January 1994 until August 1998. In 2001, when she was 14, the girl
reported the molestation and rapes to a school counselor and eventually the police.
In March 2004, the State of Washington convicted Caldwell, via guilty plea, of “assault in
the second degree with sexual motivation,” which required Caldwell to register as a sex offender.
The State court sentenced Caldwell to eight months in jail, but released him based on time served.
About two months later, in May 2004, the State convicted Caldwell of failing to register as a sex
offender and he spent another 26 days in jail. In February 2006, the State again convicted Caldwell
20a
Case: 17-2062
Document: 30-2
Filed: 08/21/2018
Page: 2
(3 of 7)
No. 17-2062, United States v. Caldwell
of failing to register as a sex offender after he provided a false address (he had registered using the
address of a bowling alley) and he spent another four months in jail. In June 2007, the State of
Washington yet again convicted Caldwell of failing to register as a sex offender after he again
provided a false address, and this time he spent 17 months in prison (charges regarding a second
false address were dismissed as already incorporated). Following his release in 2008, he was
returned to custody several times for various other offenses.
In October 2011, Caldwell decided to move to Chicago.
He notified the State of
Washington before departing and, upon arrival, registered with the Illinois Sex Offender Registry
at the Chicago Police Department. But Caldwell did not comply with the annual registration
requirements or ever update his registration. By 2013, Chicago police were looking for him.
Eventually, police discovered that he had moved to Michigan without registering as a sex offender
in Michigan, in violation of both the Federal Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act
(SORNA) and Michigan law. When the police arrested Caldwell in February 2017, he admitted
that he knew the registration requirements and knew that he was in violation, but complained that
he was “tired” and had struggled to get the necessary documentation, particularly a birth certificate.
He also admitted that he had not applied for Michigan identification or for welfare assistance
because that would have given him away.
In March 2017, the federal grand jury indicted Caldwell on a charge of failing to register
as a sex offender, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a) and 42 U.S.C. § 16901, et seq.1 Caldwell
pled guilty without a plea agreement. Prior to sentencing, the PSR tabulated Caldwell’s criminal
history score at 13, which corresponds to a criminal history category of VI. Coupled with a base
offense level of 10, the PSR’s advisory guideline range was 24 to 30 months in prison.
1
On September 1, 2017, 42 U.S.C. § 16901 was re-classified as 34 U.S.C. § 20901.
2
21a
Case: 17-2062
Document: 30-2
Filed: 08/21/2018
Page: 3
(4 of 7)
No. 17-2062, United States v. Caldwell
Caldwell objected to the criminal-history-score tabulation’s adding three points from the
two convictions in 2004 (i.e., the “assault in the second degree with sexual motivation” and the
first failure to register). Specifically, he argued that because the present offense occurred when he
moved to Michigan in 2015, the tabulation should not have included the 2004 convictions because
they had occurred over ten years earlier and were sentences of less than 13 months. See U.S.S.G.
§ 4A1.2(e)(1) & (2). The PSR responded that the offense actually began in Chicago in December
2013, on “the date law enforcement discovered [that he] was in violation of SORNA,” and
continued until his apprehension in Michigan in 2017, as “an ongoing offense that involved the
same course of conduct,” which put the 2004 convictions within ten years.
The PSR also explained that if Caldwell were correct, the new criminal history score would
be ten, the new criminal history category would be V, and—coupled with the base offense level of
ten—the new PSR advisory guideline range would be 21 to 27 months in prison.
At sentencing, Caldwell argued that the present offense, under SORNA, was based on
interstate travel from Illinois to Michigan in 2015 and was not the same course of conduct as his
failure to register in Illinois in 2013, under Illinois law, which involved no interstate travel. The
district court disagreed, finding that Caldwell’s failures to register on the states’ sex-offender
registries was a continuing course of conduct for which SORNA provides federal jurisdiction;
SORNA does not create a national registry or a separate interstate-travel offense.
The court adopted the PSR’s advisory guidelines range of 24 to 30 months, opined that a
sentence “within the guideline range” would be appropriate, and sentenced Caldwell to 24 months.
The court’s stated reasons were Caldwell’s repeated convictions for failing to register and the need
for incremental punishment to ensure that he did not receive a lighter sentence for repeating the
same violations. Specifically, the court expressed a need to sentence Caldwell to more than the
17 months in prison that he had received the last time he was sentenced for failing to register.
3
22a
Case: 17-2062
Document: 30-2
Filed: 08/21/2018
Page: 4
(5 of 7)
No. 17-2062, United States v. Caldwell
In this appeal, Caldwell contests the relevant-conduct determination that underlies his
sentence. “Because a district court’s relevant-conduct determination involves the application of
law to facts, we review [it] de novo.” United States v. Amerson, 886 F.3d 568, 573 (6th Cir. 2018)
(citation omitted). “The government bears the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the
evidence, that another offense constituted relevant conduct.” Id. (citation omitted). For our
purposes, “relevant conduct” means that the “acts and omissions . . . were part of the same course
of conduct.” U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(a)(2). The Guidelines’ commentary elaborates:
Same course of conduct. Offenses that do not qualify as part of a common scheme
or plan may nonetheless qualify as part of the same course of conduct if they are
sufficiently connected or related to each other as to warrant the conclusion that they
are part of a[n] . . . ongoing series of offenses. Factors that are appropriate to the
determination of whether offenses are sufficiently connected or related to each
other to be considered as part of the same course of conduct include the degree of
similarity of the offenses, the regularity (repetitions) of the offenses, and the time
interval between the offenses. . . . The nature of the offenses may also be a relevant
consideration (e.g., a defendant’s failure to file tax returns in three consecutive
years appropriately would be considered as part of the same course of conduct
because such returns are only required at yearly intervals).
U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3, com. n. 5(B)(ii).
Caldwell contends that his failure to register as a sex offender in Michigan in 2015 was not
a continuous course of conduct with his failure to maintain his registration as a sex offender in
Illinois in 2013 (after he had originally registered in 2011). He argues that the 2013 and 2015
offenses are not similar, inasmuch as the latter involved interstate travel whereas the former did
not; the former was a failure to update his registration while the latter was a failure to register at
all; the two offenses occurred in different states; and the two offenses occurred two years apart.
The district court was unpersuaded by these same arguments, finding the interstate travel aspect
irrelevant to the substance of the offense and characterizing Caldwell’s conduct as a longstanding
refusal to register as required under the law, which was demonstrated by his repeated and
continuous failures to register in multiple states (i.e., Washington, Illinois, and Michigan) as well
4
23a
Case: 17-2062
Document: 30-2
Filed: 08/21/2018
Page: 5
(6 of 7)
No. 17-2062, United States v. Caldwell
as his efforts to avoid detection in Michigan by choosing not to acquire Michigan identification or
apply for state welfare assistance.
Caldwell’s arguments fare no better here. SORNA itself disposes of Caldwell’s contention
that his 2013 Illinois offense and his 2015 Michigan offense are necessarily unconnected or
unrelated because the former involved no interstate travel. While SORNA did not require Caldwell
to inform the sex-offender registry in Chicago that he was departing Illinois, see Nichols v. United
States, 578 U.S. --, 136 S. Ct. 1113 (2016), it nonetheless has two requirements that apply to
Caldwell here: (1) that he maintain his registration while living in Chicago, see 42 U.S.C. §
16913(a) (eff. July 27, 2006 to Aug. 31, 2017) (the “sex offender shall register, and keep the
registration current, in each jurisdiction where the offender resides”); and (2) that he register in
Michigan within three days of his relocation, such that Michigan could inform the Illinois registry
of the change, see § 16913(c) (eff. July 27, 2006 to Aug. 31, 2017). Consequently, the 2013 Illinois
offense and the 2015 Michigan offense are equally violations of SORNA and, given that one led
directly into the other, they are inherently related.
This same analysis applies to Caldwell’s frivolous argument that the offenses are unrelated
because one was a failure to maintain or update his registration while the other was a failure to
register at all. That distinction is not material. Finally, the fact that the offenses occurred in
different states and, in Caldwell’s view, two years apart, does not necessarily render them
unconnected or unrelated. As the district court recognized, the “2013” offense actually spanned
the time from when Caldwell first failed to update his Illinois registration—at least as early as
October 2012 when his annual update was due—until he left Illinois for Michigan in 2015, at
which point these offenses were separated by only the time it took to make the trip.
The district court was correct that the 2013 and 2015 offenses were a continuing course of
conduct, i.e., “related conduct,” which put the 2004 convictions within ten years of those offenses,
5
24a
Case: 17-2062
Document: 30-2
Filed: 08/21/2018
Page: 6
(7 of 7)
No. 17-2062, United States v. Caldwell
so as to include those points in the criminal history tabulation. The court’s advisory guidelines
calculation was, therefore, correct and the within-guidelines sentence was reasonable.
We AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.
6
25a
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.