Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Brian Mark Burmaster, Petitioner v. Switzerland

No.

ig /233

FILED

MAR 26 2019

In tltbe

Supreme Court of the Gntteb btateo

BRIAN MARK BURMASTER,

Petitioner,

VS.

SWITZERLAND,

Respondent.

On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari

To The United States Court Of Appeals

For The Third Circuit

PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

BRIAN MARK BURMASTER

Burmaster International Group CEO

Marfa Building 4th Floor

Weygand Street at the Souks

P0 Box 11-2961

Beirut, Lebanon

Phone (+34) 689 926 567

I

QUESTION PRESENTED

The primary federal question that I ask is:

Since the inception of the United States Supreme

Court led by Chief Justice John Jay, there has never

been a Writ of Certiorari where the respondent fails to

appoint counsel and the defendant's peaceful legal proceedings goes uncontested, unanswered and unchallenged by ignoring the seven prior attempts to contact

their worldwide embassies and their extradition office,

isn't this an admission of Switzerland's guilt in the heinous and despicable international act of a chemical

weapon attack on a citizen of the USA (18 U.S.C. § 229

Section C3), where there are no previous cases and

shouldn't the United States Supreme Court punish

this unacceptable act of international terrorism by enforcing the paltry lien of US$440 million (tax-free) for

the plaintiff-victim and US$330 million for American

Federal Taxes on Swiss Assets here in the United

States?

11

PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING

Petitioner Brian Mark Burmaster and the defendant,

the sovereign nation of Switzerland are the only parties to this proceeding.

111

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

QUESTION PRESENTED ...................................

I

PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING......................ii

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .................................iv

OPINIONS BELOW.............................................1

JURISDICTION...................................................1

STATUTORY PROVISION ..................................2

STATEMENT OF THE CASE..............................3

REASON FOR GRANTING THE PETITION

4

INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE....................4

LEN AGAINST SWISS ASSETS IN USA

5

CONCLUSION.....................................................5

APPENDIX

United States Court of Appeals for the Third

Circuit, Order, January 29, 2019 .....................App. 1

United States District Court for the District of

Columbia, Order, October 16, 2018 .................App. 3

United States District Court for the Western

District of Pennsylvania, Memorandum Order, August 3,2018 ........................................... App. 4

United States District Court for the Western

District of Pennsylvania, Magistrate's Report

and Recommendation, June 28, 2018 ..............App. 6

ILI

A

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

Page

US Federal Law 18 U.S.C. § 229 Chemical Weapons Attack(C3) "is committed against a national of the US while the national is outside

the United States ............................................... 1, 2, 4

PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Brian Mark Burmaster respectfully petitions for a

Writ of Certiorari before the Supreme Court of the

United States to grant this Writ of Certiorari and Lien

against Swiss assets in the United States so that the

Federal Courts are on legal record of condemning this

heinous and despicable international act of terrorism

by Switzerland of a chemical weapon attack on an US

Citizen (18 U.S.C.* 229 C3)

OPINIONS BELOW

The opinion of the Court of Appeals in the Third

Circuit is not reported but is given in the Appendix in

its entirety. Similarly, the opinions for the lower U.S.

Federal Court in the Western District of Pennsylvania

is not reported but is given in the Appendix in its entirety. The opinion of the US Federal District Court in

Washington DC is also given.

ERREEMEM

JURISDICTION

The Court of Appeals entered its judgement on

January 29, 2019, App. infra at 1. This petition is filed

within 90 days of that date. The court's jurisdiction is

invoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1254(1).

2

STATUTORY PROVISION

There is very little case law on US Federal Law 18

U.S.C.§ 229 C3 where an American citizen has been

subjected to a chemical weapons attack, by foreign authorities since it is truly such a heinous and despicable

international act of terrorism. However, the facts of

this worldwide catastrophe are not in dispute. The

plaintiff was ordered to see a psychiatrist employed by

Switzerland (a.k.a. "Swiss Miss Quack") upon my illegal arrest at the American Embassy in Bern on September 3, 2015 for an international "threatening

communication." At the Bern prison, I inform Miss

Swiss Quack that under my legal system, I throw her

in jail (see App. 30 of my denied Writ of Certiorari #91370 where I precisely state "This motion throws all

these chemical fraud conspirators in Federal Bureau of

Prison maximum security. . "). At this historical moment in time, Swiss Miss Quack orders a chemical assault on an American citizen living overseas. Because

Swiss Miss Quack did not like my objective and logical

chemical engineering system of minimizing unwanted

chemicals directed at human beings, I was in a chemical coma for a couple of days.

.

The Swiss government has never denied these undisputable facts of an unwanted chemical weapons assault, a despicable and heinous international act of

terrorism on an American citizen in total defiance of

US Federal Law 18 U.S.C. § 229 C3.

3

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

I have repeatedly contacted the Swiss Government. This Writ of Certiorari to the United States

highest court contains the official effort by the plaintiff

to seek both international justice and world peace. My

seven attempts to contact Switzerland are documented

here:

Mr. Roland Hugo Extradition Officer at his

Swiss Government address in Bern, Switzerland via Fed Ex (780875792268) delivered on

May 14, 2018.

-

Mr. David Vogelsanger Swiss Ambassador to

New Zealand in Wellington via New Zealand

Post (LF559596944NZ) delivered on June 18,

2018.

-

Swiss Ambassador to

Ms. Fabrice Filliez

Singapore via Sing Post (RC2681808195G)

delivered on July 2, 2018.

-

Swiss Ambassador to

Ms. Maya Tissafi

United Arab Emirates (UAE) in Abu Dhabi

via Emirati Post (RR180218735AE) delivered

on July 9, 2018.

-

Mr. Martin Dahinden Swiss Ambassador to

the United States of America in Washington

DC via Fed Ex (78179520 730) delivered on

July 13, 2018.

-

Swiss Ambassador to

Ms. Monika Kirgoz

Lebanon in Beirut (RR190863150LB) via Liban Post delivered on July 16, 2018.

-

Swiss Ambassador to

7) Mr. Eric Mayoraz

Mexico in Mexico City via DHL (4551080026)

delivered on January 16, 2019

-

Thus, the plaintiff has repeatedly contacted the

Swiss Government and they have failed to respond and

defend their despicable and heinous international act

of terrorism, chemical assault on an American citizen

in total defiance of US Federal Law 18 U.S.C. § 229 C3.

However, in spite of all these documented deliveries, US Federal Judge Amy Berman Jackson of the Federal Circuit of Washington DC makes the outrageous

statement "Because plaintiff has not served defendant,

the Court will dismiss the case without prejudice

REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION

A. INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE

The global community was uniform in their condemnation of the chemical weapon assaults used by

"Chemical Au", who was a henchman for Iraq's dictator, Saddam Hussein. Likewise, our nation's highest

court must condemn the actions of Swiss Miss Quack.

As proof-positive, the United States Supreme Court

must order that the Lien (Part B) against Swiss Assets

here in the United States of America be immediately

enforced and those assets seized.

5

B. LIEN AGAINST SWISS ASSETS IN USA

Words are cheap. This is especially true in Washington DC, where former Attorney General Loretta

Lynch guaranteed the plaintiff a trial by jury in a

signed and sworn legal document. Seizing Swiss assets

(such as UBS and Credit Suisse) in the amount of

US$440 million to the plaintiff and US$330 to the IRS

(Total of US$770 million) sends a resounding international message that chemical assaults, which are heinous and despicable international act of terrorism will

never be tolerated by the United States Supreme

Court. This Lien will be transmitted to the US Federal

Courthouse in Erie, PA (Western District of Pennsylvania) where the original civil litigation was filed. For

the record, I plan to use this real money to acquire an

American engineering division in order to pursue

peaceful and constructive usage of chemistry and engineering.

CONCLUSION

This heinous and despicable international act of

a chemical Weapons Attack which was

terrorism

committed against a citizen of the US while that citizen was outside the United States can be turned into

a positive event by providing the necessary funds for

my company Burmaster International Group to proceed with patent pending chemistry, to clean air

streams, purify water and reduce gaseous pollutants,

-

among other high ideals, which are the core attributes

of my internationally chartered business.

BRIAN BURMASTER

February 26, 2019