RUL 3'lb-' Ill.Â) j Ri &.

't '53

SECTION \l · ç

RUL 3'lb-' Ill.Â) j Ri &.

AVAIn.IT~

PUBLIC A..l.. .. .... 1.1 )/~1

RESPONSE OF TH OFFICE OF CIDF COUNSEL

DMSION OF INSTMNT MAAGEl\NT

August 28, 2000

Our Ref. No. 20008251329

Janus Adviser Series

File No. 811-9885

Your letter dated July 17, 2000, requests our assurance that we would not recommend

t

t

t

the Securities Act of 1933 ("1933

enforcement action to the Commssion under Section 5(b) of

the

Act"), Section 34(b) ofthè Investment Company Act of 1940 ("1940 Act") or Section 206 of

Investment Advisers Act of 1940 ("Advisers Act") if Janus Adviser Series ("Adviser Series"), an

open-end investment company organied by Janus Capital Corporation ("Janus Capital"), presents

standardized performance information, and performance information in response to certai items

, , of Form N-1A, for each of ten series of Adviser Series which includes performance inormation

for periods prior to the date that Adviser Series' registration statement becomes effective.

Specifically, ten ofthe series of Adviser Series will be formed from the spin-off of an existing

class often corresponding series of

Janus Aspen Series ("Aspen Series"), a registered open-end

investment company. You seek to include the performance information of a spun-off class of a

series of Aspen Series as, among other things, par of the standardized performance information

of the corresponding series of Adviser Series.

BACKGROUN

You state that Aspen Series currently consists often series, each of

which offers to the

public three classes, the Institutional Shares class (collectively, for all ten series, the "Institutional

Classes"), the Retirement Shares class (collectively, for all ten series, the "Retirement Classes")

and the Service Shares class (collectively, for all ten series, the "Service Classes"). i The

Institutional Classes commenced operations in 1993 and are sold primarily to life insurance

separate accounts to serve as an investment option under varable life insurance and anuity

contracts. The Retirement Classes commenced operations on May 1, 1997, and are sold primarily

to qualified retirement plans. The Servce Classes commenced operations on December 31, 1999,

and are sold primarily to life insurance separate accounts to serve as an investment option under

varable life insurance and annuity contracts. The Retirement Classes charge a .25%

administration fee and a .25% fee under a Rule 12b-l plan. The Servce Classes charge a .25%

fee under a Rule 12b-1 plan. The Institutional Classes impose no such fees. Class-specific

expenses are allocated only to the relevant classes, and the three classes havé diferent dividend

and capital gain distributions. You state that because of the differences in fees, expenses and

distributions, the classes have different net asset values and different performance information.

The Retirement Classes, Institutional Classes and the Servce Classes present their own

performance information in their respective prospectuses, statements of additional information,

advertisements and sales literature.

You state that Aspen Series had established Retirement Shares for an eleventh series,

the High-Yield Portfolio, but no Retirement Shares of that series were publicly sold. You also

state that Aspen Series has thee additional series but does not offer the Retirement Shares

class for those thee series.

- 2­

You state that the Retirement Classes have certai regulatory litations imposed on them

beca-Lse the Institutional Classes and the Servce Classes are sold to insurance company separate

accounts as investment options for varable insurance contracts. Specifically, you state that

t

t

t

Aspen Series must comply with Section 817(h) of the Intern Revenue Code and the

regulations thereunder which prevent sales Öf shares of any fud underlying varable inurance

contracts (such as Aspen Series) to investors other than inurance companes and certin

qualified retirement plan.2 To remove this limitation from the Retirement Classes and to

expand the pool of potential investors, you state that Aspen Series will spin-off the Aspen Series

, , Retirement Class of each of ten series to form ten newly created series of Adviser Series (each a

"Fund"), each of which will operate in the same maner as the Retirement Classes currently

operate.

You assert that the Funds should be permtted to carr over the performance inormation

of the Retirement Classes and to present the carred-over performance information as part of the

the Funds in each Fund's registration statement,

standardized performance information of

advertisements or sales literature or as par of performance information in each Fund's prospectus

Form N-1A.3 You represent that Adviser Series wi disclose,

in response to certain items of

when presenting this performance information, that each Fund was previously organized as a

Retirement Class of Aspen Series, the performance information of each Fund includes

performance of the Retirement Class of Aspen Series and the date that each fund commenced

operations.

ANALYSIS

Section 34(b) of the 1940 Act, in pertinent par, makes it unlawful for any person to

make any untre statement of a material fact in any fud's registration statement or other

document fied pursuant to the 1940 Act,4 or to. omit to state any fact necessary to prevent the

2

You state that Janus Capital and many of the sponsors of the qualified plan currently

investing in the Retirement Classes believe that plån sponsors and paricipants want to invest

more than qualified retirement plan assets in the Retirement Classes. You state, for example,

that plan sponsors have expressed a desire to use Retirement Classes in their non-qualified

plan so tht they have the same options in both their qualified and non-qualified plans.

3

You have not asked, and we express no view regarding, any other issues raised under

the 1940 Act by the spin-off.

4

Section 24(b) of the 1940 Act, in pertinent par, makes it unlawful for a fud to

transmit any advertisement or other sales literature addressed to or intended for distribution to

prospective investors unless thee copies of the full text thereof have been fied with the

(continued)

-3­

statements made therein from being materially misleading. Section 206 of the Advisers Act,

among other thgs, makes it unawful for any investment adviser to employ any device,

scheme, or arfice to defraud any client or prospective client or to engage in any tranaction,

practice, or course of business which operates as a fraud or deceit upon any client or

~. prospective client.

t

includes performance inormation in its registration statement, advertisements

or sales literatue, it must present that inormation in accordance with "stadardized"

requirements.5 In paricular, Item 21(b) of Form N-1A requires a fud that advertises its

, , performance inormation to disclose in its registration statement its performance inormation

in that item. Similarly, Rule

calculated in accordance with the standardized method set fort

. If a fud

482 under the 1933 Act provides, among other thgs, that if an open-end mangement

investment company (other than a money market fud) includes its performance in an

advertisement, it must include stadardized total retu inormation in accordance with

provides that mutual fund

the rule. Rule 34b-1 under the 1940 Act also

paragraph (e)(3) of

sales literatue (~, supplemental sales literature accompaned or preceded by a statutory

prospectus, and pamphlets or other wrtten sales material) containg fund performance

inormation must include, among other thigs, the total return calculations required by

paragraph (e)(3) of Rule 482.

Commission or are fied with the Commission with ten days thereafter. Rule 24b-3 under

the 1940 Act generally provides that any advertisement or sales literature fied with the

National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., shall be deemed fued with the Commssion

for purposes of Section 24(b) of the 1940 Act.

5

A fud must calculate its standardized performance inormation in accordance with the

requirements of Item 21 of Form N-IA. A fund may present non-stadardized performance

inormation in its registration statement, advertisements or sales literature, provided tht,

among other thgs, the non-standardized performance inormation contain all elements of

return and is accompaned by the required stadardized performance inormation. See Rule

482(e)(4) under the 1933 Act; Item 21(b)(4) of Form N-1A. See also Investment Company

Act Release No. 15315, at § VI (Sept. 17, 1986) ("Proposing Release") (Rule 34b-l does "not

make the standardized performance data the exclusive performance data in sales literature").

We disagree with your assertion that, absent the requested relief, curent shareholders

of the Retirement Classes would "see the performance inormation of their chosen investment

options wiped away." We note that, among other thgs, the Funds could supplementally

present the Retirement Classes' performance inormation as non-standardized performance

inormation in each Fund's registration statement, advertisements and sales literature, provided

that appropriate standardized performance inormation and disclosure also is presented.

- 4­

In addition, certin items of Forn N-1A generally require the presentation of

stadardized and certin other performance inormation (collectively, "required Form N-1A

performance inormation") in a fud's prospectus. Specifically, Item 2(c)(2)(üi) of Form Nt

t

t

1A requires a fud that has anual retu for at least one calendar year to provide a table

showing the fud's average anual tota retufn calculated in accordance with Item 21(b)(1).

Item 2(c)(2)(ii) of Form N-IA also requires a fud that has anual retu for at least one

calendar year to provide a bar char showing the fud's anual tota return for each of the last

10 calendar years (or for the life of the fud, if less than 1 0 years). 6 Item 5(b) of Form N -1A

. , requires that a fund include in its prospectus (unless the fund is a money market fund or the

inormation is included in the fud's latest anual shareholder report) mangement's discussion

of fud performance, including a line graph comparing the intial and su:bsequent account

values at the end of each of the most recently completed 10 fiscal years of the fund (or for the

life of the fund, if less thn 10 years), and a table, placed with or next to the graph,

providing the fund's average anual total return calculated in accordance with Item 21(b)(1).

Finlly, Item 9 of Form N -1A requires the presentation of certin fincial highlights,

including a fud's total return for the past five years (or for the period of the fud's

operations, ifless than five years).

A mutual fund generally may not present its standardized performance inormation in its

registration statement, advertisements or sales literature, or include its required Form N-1A

performance information in its prospectus, for a period prior to the effective date of the fund's

registration statement. Specificaly, Item 21 (b )( 1) of

Form N- 1 A requires a fund that advertises

performance information to disclose in its registration statement the fund's standardized

performance information for prescribed one-, five- and ten-year periods or "for the periods the

Fund has been in operation.',7 Rule 482(e) under the 1933 Act provides that mutual fund

advertisements (other than money market funds) containig pedormance information must include

standardized quotations of average anual total return calculated in accordance with Item

6

Unlike the stadardized performance inormation required to be presented in the table

by Item 2(c)(2)(iii) of Form N-IA, the anual toW return disclosure required in the bar char

by Item 2(c)(2)(ii) of Form N-1A does not reflect the deduction of sales loads or account fees

and is presented for only a single class of a multiple class fund. See Item 2(c)(2) of Form N­

lA, Instrctions L(a) and 3.(a).

7

The term "Fund" is defmed in Form N-1A as "the Registrant or a separate Series of

the Registrant," and the term "Registrant" is defined in Form N-1A as "an open-end

mangement investment company registered" under the 1940 Act. See Form N-IA, General

Instruction A. Accordingly, we interpret the phrase "for the periods the Fund has been in

operations" to be subsequent to the effective date of a fund's registration statement.

-5­

21(b)(1) of

Form N-1A for one-, five- and ten-year periods from the date that the fund's

registration statement became effective.s Simarly, Item 2(c)(2), Item 5(b)(1) and Item 9 of

Form

N-IA generaly require a mutual fund to present its required Form N-IA performance inormation

the Fund's registration statement.,,9

"only for periods subsequent to the effective date of

r

t

t

Accordingly, Rule 482(e),.Rule 34b_110 and Form N-IA do not permt a mutual fund to present

standardized pedormance inormation in its registration statement, advertisements11 or sales

a mutual fund's registration statement has

those periods, the period during which the fund's registration

been in effect for less than any of

statement has been in effect must be substituted for the period or periods otherwse required).

See also Investment Company Act Release No. 16245, at § ll.9.(a) (Feb. 2, 1988) ("Adopting

Release") (Rule 482 standardized performance information is limited "to periods subsequent to

the fund's registration statement").

effectiveness of

8

See Rule 482(e)(3) under the 1933 Act (if

9

Item 5(b)(2) of Form N-1A requires a fud to disclose its average annual total return

for specifed periods calculated in accordance with Item 21(b)(1). As noted above, under Item

21(b)(1), a fud may not present its standardized performance inormation for periods prior to

the effective date of its registration statement. See supra note 7 and accompanying text.

10

Rule 34b-1 "extend(s) the standardization requirements (of Rule 482) to fund sales

literature containg performance data." See Adopting Release, supra note 8, at § il.

Accordingly, the Rule 482 limtation that a mutual.fund may not present standardized

pedormance information using a staring date before the effective date of its registration

statement applies to the presentation of standardized performance inormation in a fund's sales

literature.

11

the 1933 Act makes it unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly,

to make use of any means or intrments of tranporttion or communication in interstate

commerce or of the mails to car or tranmit any prospectus relating to apy security with

respect to which a registration statement has been rued unless such prospectus meets the

requirements of Section 10 of the 1933 Act. A mutual fud advertisement that complies with

the requirements of Rule 482 under the 1933 Act is deemed to constitute a prospectus under

Section Web) of the 1933 Act for the purpose of Section 5(b)(1). As noted above, see supra

note 8 and accompanying text, Rule 482 provides that a mutual fud may not present its

standardized performance inormation using a staing date before the effective date of its

registration statement. As a result, the use of an advertisement presenting standardized

performance inormation using a staing date other than that permitted by Rule 482 could

result in a violation of Section 5(b)(1) of the 1933 Act because the advertisement would not

meet the requirements of Section 10 of the 1933 Act.

Section 5(b)(1) of

- 6­

literature, or to present required Form N-IA inormation in its prospectus,12 using a stari~g date

before the effective date of its registration statement.

We previously have explained that the requirement that standardized performance data

r

t

t

not include periods prior to a mutual fund's registration is intended, in par, to preclude an adviser

from establishing a number of fuds for the purpose of generating performance data, and then

registering those "incubator fuds" with the best performance records so that the newly registered

funds can use that performance.13 In addition, the Commssion has noted in the release adopting

12 Section 5(b)(2) of the 1933 Act makes it unawful for any person, directly or indirectly,

commerce any security for the

to car or cause to be cared though the mails or in interstate

purpose of sale or for delivery after sale, unless accompaned or preceded by a prospectus

meeting the requirements of Section 10(a) of the 1933 Act. Form N-1A, Par A, sets fort the

inormation required to be included in a mutual fund's Section 10(a) prospectus. As noted

above, see supra note 9 and accompanying text, the required Form N-1A performance

information, which is included in Par A of Form N-IA, may not include performance

information using a staing date before the effective date of its registration statement.

Item 2

Additionally, Form N-1A explicitly states that a fud may not include disclosure in

other than that required or permitted by that item. See Form N-IA, General Instrction

B.3.(b). Consequently, the presentation of performance inormation in response to the

required Form N-1A performance inormation in a fund's prospectus using a starting date

before the effective date of its registration statement could result in a violation of Section

5(b)(2) of the 1933 Act because the prospectus would not meet the requirements of Section

lO(a) of the 1933 Act.

13

See MassMutual Institutional Funds (pub. avail. Sept. 28, 1995) ("MassMutual"). See

also Letter from Jack W. Murhy to Wiliam Greene (Feb. 3, 1997). In

MassMutual, we

agreed not to recommend enforcement action to the Commssion if an open-end series investment

company included, as par of its standardized performance inormation, the performance

information of the unregistered investment accounts that converted into and registered under the

1940. Act to become the series. MassMutual involvêd unregistered accounts, created for purposes

entirely unrelated to the establishment of a pedormance record, that were to be converted into

series of a registered fund with substantialy similar investment objectives, policies and strategies

as the predecessor accounts.

You argue that the Funds should be permtted to car forward the performance

information of the Retirement Classes based on our position in MassMutual. Our position in

the facts and representations set forth in that letter. In

MassMutual, however, was based on all of

MassMutual, substantialy all of the assets of each unregistered predecessor account were

transferred to a corresponding successor fund, afer which the unregistered predecessor accounts

were termated. In contrast with MassMutual, you acknowledge that substantially all of the

(continued)

-7­

amendments to Rule 482 that a fund would not be permtted to advertise its performance prior to

the effectiveness of its registration statement because "fuds are liely to be managed differently

before they are offered to the public.,,14

t

t

f

You contend that the Funds' proposed use of

the performance of

the Retirement Classes

does not implicate the priar concerns agaIst permtting a fund to present standardized

performance inormation and required Form N-IA performance information prior to the effective

date of

the fund's registration statement. Specifcally, you represent that: (1) the reorganzation

has not been proposed in order to use the prior existing performance information but rather to

the Retirement Classes to meet their investors' needs and

" elimiate an impediment to the abilty of

investors; and (2) the Retirement Classes were previously par

to sell their shares to other tyes of

of a registered investment company and were subject to the same investment restrictions imposed

by the 1940 Act as those that wil be imposed on the Funds. Accordingly, you assert that your

proposal does not implicate the priar concerns underlying the requirement that standardized

performance inormation not include periods before a fund's registration.

You also assert that the Funds wil operate, for all practical purposes, as the continuation

the

ofthe Retirement Classes. Specificaly, you represent the following: (1) on the date of

reorganzation, assets equal to the value of all of the outstanding shares of the Retirement Class of

the ten series of Aspen Series will be transferred to a corresponding Fund/5 (2) each

each of

Fund will have the same investment adviser and the same investment objectives, policies and

restrictions as the corresponding series of Aspen Series; (3) the portfolio composition of each

Fund will be substantialy the saie as the portfolio composition (except as to amounts of

securities) of

the corresponding series of Aspen Series imediately prior to the reorganation;16

assets of each series of Aspen Series wil not be transferred to the corresponding Fund and each

series of Aspen Series will continue to operate after the spin-off We do not agree, therefore, that

qur position in MassMutual applies to your proposal.

.14

See Adopting Release, supra note 8, at § ll.9.(a).

15

You state that each Fund will have the same shareholders as the Retirement Class of the

corresponding series of Aspen Series. Each shareholder will receive, on the date of the

reorganzation, Fund shares with the same value as the Retirement Class shares that the

shareholder previously held.

16

You represent that the assets transferred to each Fund will include a pro rata share of each

securities position in the corresponding series of Aspen Series immediately prior to the

reorganiation except for (1) securities that are subject to restrictions on resale or transfer, such

to eliminate fractional shares and odd lots of

as private placement securities, and (2) rounding off

securities. You state that, in other words, you generally will allocate to each Fund full lots of

(continued)

-8­

(4) no Fund will have any pre-existing assets or a pedormance history; and (5) afer the spin-off

Aspen Series wi no longer have any Retirement Classes. You also state that the Retirement

Class for each series of Aspen Series has its own pedormance

history,

andcontend

each class

11 Essentially,

you

that currently

the spin-off

presents its own fiancial highlghts in its prospectus.

~. of the Retirement Classes is not a fundamental change in the operations of the Retirement Classes,

t and, as a continuation of the Retirement Clasšës, the Funds should not abandon the past

18

performance of the Retirement Classes.

securities (rather than odd lots and fractional shares), and you generaly wi not alocate to each

, , Fund private placement securities.

17

fud, as described in your

The Division views the spin-off of a class of shares of a

letter, into a newly formed investment company (a "shell investment company") as a

reorganation of the class into the shell investment company. As such, the class is deemed to

be the accounting survivor for financial reporting purposes and must car over the fud's

financial statements and the class's fincial highlights. You represent that Adviser Series wil

include in, or incorporate by reference into, Adviser Series' intial registration statement on

the Aspen Series Retirement Classes and the financial

Form N-1A the financial highlights of

statements of Aspen Series to satisfy the requirements of Items 9 and 22 of Form N-1A. You

also represent that the financial statements wil be prepared in accordance with, and cover the

periods required by Regulation S-X, Aricles 3 and 6, and Rule 30d-l under the 1940 Act.

Because ths reorganiation also includes a change in fiscal year-end, audited fincial

statements of Aspen Series and financial highlights of Aspen Series Retirement Classes for the

period since the Aspen Series' previous audited fincial. statements and fincial highlights

though the date of the proposed reorganiation wil be added to the Adviser Series registration

statement on a timely basis. You represent that Adviser Series wil include in, or, if

appropriate, incorporate by reference into, subsequent fiings the fincial statements of Aspen

Series and fincial highlights of Aspen Series Retirement Classes for all prior periods

required by Regulation S-X and Form N-1A. Any questions regarding the treatment of

accounting issues in this letter should be directed to John S. Capone, Chief Accountant, or Brian

the

D. Bullard or Kenneth B. Robins, Assistant Chief Accountants, in the Division's Offce of

Chief Accountant at 202-942-0590. ­

18

Cf. Comstock Parters Strategy Fund, Inc. (pub. avail. Apr. 6, 1995) (conversion from

a closed-end fund to an open-end fund, by itself, is not such a fundamental change that would

justify, under Rule 482(e), the elimtion of prior performance); Zweig Series Trust (pub.

avaiL. Jan. 10, 1990) (fund may not exclude performance inormation when new investment

adviser has common officers with prior investment adviser); The Fairont Fund Trust (pub.

avaiL. Dec. 9, 1988) (fund's change from a non-diversifed, aggressive trading fund to a

diversified, balanced fund would not warrant, under Rule 482(e), the exclusion of the fund's

stadardized performance inormation for the period prior to the management change).

- 9­

the performaace

We agree that, as described in your letter, the Funds' proposed use of

inormation of the Retirement Classes does not implicate the priar concerns agaist permtting

the fund's registration

..

a fund to present pedormance inormation prior to the effective date of

t

t

t

statement. We also agree that, as described in your letter, the Funds effectively wi operate as a

continuation of the Retirement Classes such tltt the performance history of the Retirement

Classes may be cared forward. Accordingly, we would not recommend enforcement action to

the Commssion under Section 5(b) of

the 1933 Act, Section 34(b) of

the 1940 Act, or Section

206 of the Advisers Act if Adviser Series includes standardized pedormance information in each

" Fund's registration statement, advertisements or sales literature, or includes required Form N-1A

performance information in its prospectus that includes performance information of the

Retirement Classes prior to the date that Adviser Series' registration statement becomes

effective.19 QUi position is based on the facts and representations contaied in your letter. Our

position is limted solely to the spin..off of an entire class of an existing registered fund and

does not address the use of performance inormation by a fund that is formed by caring out a

portion of a predecessor class. You should note that any diferent facts or representations might

require a diferent conclusion.i°

~ì'~

Brent J. Fields

Senior Counsel

19

We believe that a Fund that includes the performance inormation of the corresponding

Retirement Class in its stadardized performance inormation and required Form N-IA

performance inormation may not subsequently exclude that performance inormation, absent

the Fund undergoing a fundamental change in operations. See,~, Unified Funds (pub.

avail. Apr. 23, 1991); John Hancock Asset Allocation Trust (pub. avaiL. Jan. 3, 1991);

Founders Fund, Inc. (pub. avaiL. Oct. 15, 1990). We also note that a mutul fund that is

created by the spin-off of a class of another fud and that presents its performance inormation

but fails to disclose adequately the performance of the predecessor class (for example, as

supplemental, non-stadardized performance inormation in the fund's registration statement,

advertisements or sales literature) could be deemed to have omitted to state a fact necessary in

order to make the statements in its registration statement, advertisements or sales literatue not

materially misleading.

20

Ths response should not be construed as providing no-action assurance with respect to

any particular presentation of the performance of the Funds.

SHEÄ & GARDNER

1800 MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE, N. W.

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20036-1872

CHRISTOPHER E. PALMER

TELEPHONE:(202) 828-2000

DIRECT LINE

FAX: (202) 828-2195

(202) 828-2093

July 17, 2000

r

t

t

Douglas J. Scheidt, Esq.

Associate Director and Chief Counsel

Division of Investment Management

Securties and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Re: Janus Adviser Series

Dear Mr. Scheidt:

staff of

On behalf of Janus Capital Corporation ("Janus Capital"), we hereby request that the

the Securties and Exchange Commission (the "Staf') provide its assurance that it

would not recommend enforcement action under Section 5(b) of

the Securties Act of 1933

the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "1940 Act")

or Section 206 of the Investment Advisers Act of1940 (the "Advisers Act"), ifJanus Adviser

Series ("Adviser Series"), a new open-end investment company organzed by Janus Capital,

presents standardized performance information and performance information in response to

Form N-1A (collectively, "performance information") as described inthis

certain items of

(the "1933 Act"), Section 34(b) of

letter.

Janus Aspen Series ("Aspen Series"), a r~gistered open-end investment company,

intends to spin off one class to the new Adviser Series (the "Planed Reorganzation").

Adviser Series would resemble in all material respects the spun-off class. Given that Adviser

Series will be the continuation of that class, we believe that the only meaningfu and

complete presentation of Adviser Series' investment performance will be to include the

class' existing pedormance prior to the Planed Reorganzation. Accordingly, we propose

to car over the class' existing pedormance information when the Planed Reorganzation

occurs. After the Planed Reorganzation, Adviser Series would then include the cared-

over performance when calculating its own performance information.

Douglas J. Scheidt, Esq.

Associate Director and Chief Counel

Division of Investment Management

Securties and Exchange Commission

July 17, 2000

Page 2

t

t

t

I.

Background

Aspen Series is a registered open-end investment company that curently consists of

ten series having thee classes (each, a "Fund"), the Institutional Shares class (collectively

for all Funds, the "Institutional Classes"), the Retirement Shares class (collectively for all

Funds, the "Retirement Classes") and the Services Shares class (collectively for all Funds,

the "Service Classes").l Janus Capital serves as investment adviser to all of

the Aspen

Series Funds.

Aspen Series' thee classes are each aied at different groups of investors. The

Institutional Classes, which commenced operations in 1993, are sold primarly to life

under varable life insurance and

anuity contracts. The Retirement Classes, which commenced operations on May 1, 1997,

insurance separate accounts to serve as investment options

are sold to qualified retirement plans. The Service Classes commenced operations on

December 31, 1999, and, like the Institutional Classes, are sold primarily to life insurance

separate accounts to serve as investment options under variable life insurance and anuity

contracts~ Each class is offered pursuant to a separate prospectus and statement of additional

information. There is no exchange privilege between the classes. As of

December 31, 1999,

the Retirement Classes had approximately $380 milion in assets.

The three classes have different fee structues. Specifically, the Retirement Classes

charge a 0.25% administration fee and a 0.25% fee under a Rule 12b-1 plan. The Service

Classes charge a 0.25% fee under a Rule 12b-1 plan. The Institutional Class imposes no

such fees. Class-specific expenses are allocated only to the relevant class, and the three

classes also have different dividend and capita gain distributions. As a result of these

differences in fees, expenses, and distributions, the classes have different net asset values and

different pedormance information.

Each class presents its own performance information in its respective prospectus,

statement of additional information, and advertising and supplementa sales literatue.

Performance information for the Institutional Classes reflects the classes' actual historical

performance from the date each Fund commenced operations. Performance information for

the Retirement Classes reflects the classes' actual historical performance for the period since

1 Aspen Series had established a Retirement Shares class for an eleventh series, the HighYield Portfolio, but no Retirement Shares of that series were publicly sold. Aspen Series has

three additional series, but none of those thee series has a Retirement Shares class.

Douglas J. Scheidt, Esq.

Associate Director and Chief Counsel

Division of

Investment Management

Securities and Exchange Commission

July 17, 2000

Page 3

t

t

t

they commenced operations on May i, 1997, and also includes the Institutional Classes'

historical performance f~r the period each Fud commenced operations iitil April

30, 1997,

restated, pursuant to Quest for Value Dual Purose Fund. Inc. (pub. avaiL. Feb. 28, 1997), to

reflect the Retirement Classes' fees and expenses (without waivers or reimbursements)

disclosed in the initial prospectus for the RetÍrement Classes dated May 1, 1997.2

II. The Planned Reorganization

Because the Institutional Classes and the Service Classes are sold to insurance

company separate accounts as an investment option for varable insurance contracts, the

Retirement Classes are subject to limits that do not apply to most other fuds. Specifically,

the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations thereunder prevent sales of

Section 817(h) of

shares of a fud underlying variable insurance contracts, including Aspen Series, to investors

other than insurance companes and certn quaified retirement plans. Ths limitation has

become a problem for Aspen Series and its investors. Janus Capital and many of the

sponsors ofthe qualified plans curently investing in the Retirement Classes believe that plan

sponsors and paricipants want to invest more than qualified retirement plan assets in the

Retirement Classes. For example, plan sponsors have expressed a desire to use the

Retirement Classes in their non-qualified plans so thatthey have the same options in both

their qualified and non-qualified plans. In addition, Janus Capita would like to be able to

expand the pool of potential investors generally.

The Planed Reorganzation is designed to give the Retirement Classes the abilty to

respond to these requests of plan sponsors and to allow generally for greater growt of the

Retirement Classes. In the Planed Reorganzation, Aspen Series would spin off the

Retirement Classes to form the newly-created Adviser Series, which will operate in the same

maner as the Retirement Classes curently do. Under this Planed Reorg~zation, assets

of each Fund equal to the value of all outstading shares of the Retirement Class of that Fund

wil be transferred to a corresponding new Adviser Series Fund, which will have no

preexisting assets or performance history, and all Retirement Class shareholders will have

their shares replaced by Adviser Series shares of equal value.

2 Three Funds commenced operations on or after May 1, 1997. The Retirement Class

performance information for these Funds therefore consists solely of the class' actual

historical performance. Performance information for the Service Classes is calculated in a

maner similar to that used for the Retirement Classes.

Douglas 1. Scheidt, Esq.

Associate Director and Chief Counsel

Division of Investment Management

. Securties and Exchange Commssion

July 17, 2000

Page 4

t

t

t

When the Planed Reorganzation is complete, Aspen Series will no longer have any

Retirement Classes. Instead, Adviser Series will operate, for all practical puroses, as the

the Retirement Classes, which it will resemble in all material respects:

continuation of

Each Adviser Series Fund will have the same shareholders as the Retirement

Class of the corresponding Aspen Series Fund. On the date of the Planed

Reorganzation, each shareholder will receive Adviser Series shares with the

same value as the Retirement Class shares that the shareholder previously held.

Each Adviser Series Fund wil have the same investment adviser and the same

investment objectives, policies, and restrctions as the corresponding Aspen

Series Fund.

The assets transferred to each Adviser Series Fund will include a pro-rata share

of each securties position in the corresponding Aspen Series Fund immediately

prior to the Planed Reorganzation except for (1) securties that are subject to

restrctions on resale or transfer, such as private

placement securties, and (2)

.rounding off to eliminate fractional shares and odd lots of securities. In other

words, each Aspen Series Fund generally wil allocate to its corresponding

Adviser Series Fund fun lots of securties (rather than odd lots and fractional

shares) and each Aspen Series Fund generally will not allocate to its

corresponding Adviser Series Fund private placement securities.

Adviser Series will have exactly the same fee strctue as the Retirement Classes.

In addition, Janus

Capital has agreed to limit the overall expenses of each

Adviser Series Fund to the overall expense ratio of

the

corresponding Retirement

Class as a date set prior to the Planed Reorganzation. Janus Capital will be

contractually obligated to keep these expense limitations in place for three years

following the Planed Reorgantion. Thus, Adviser Series' expense ratios after

the Planed Reorganzation will be no greater than the curent Retirement

Classes' expense ratios, and will be guaranteed not to increase for at least thee

years.

Douglas J. Scheidt, Esq.

Associate Director and Chief Counsel

Division of Investment Management

Securties and Exchange Commission

July 17, 2000

Page 5

The charer documents, bylaws, and advisory agrettments of Adviser Series will

be substatialiy the same as those of Aspen Series; and the distribution agreement

r

t

f

and plan of Adviser Series will be substatially the same as those of the

Retirement Classes. Moreover, Adviser Series will have the same directors and

the same offcers as Aspen Series.

The Retirement Class of each Aspen Series Fund curently presents its own

financial highlights in its prospectus, and the Adviser Series registration

statement will car forward financial information from Aspen Series.3

In sum, the Planed Reorganzation will have little, if any, practical effect on the Retirement

Classes and their shareholders, other than to eliminate the restrctions on potential investors.

III. Relevant Statutes and Rules

Any mutual fund presenting performance information in a registration statement,

advertisement or sales literatue must include standardized performance information

calculated in accordance with Item 21 (b) of Form N -1 A. See Rule 482 under the 1933 Act

and Rule 34b-1 under the 1940 Act. Items 2( c )(2)(ii), 2( c )(2)(iii), 5(b), and 9 of

Form N-1A

require the presentation of certin stadardized and other performance inormation in a

fud's prospectus (or, in some cases, in the anual report) (collectively, the "required form

N-IA performance information"). In general, these rules and form items require that

standardized performance information and required Form N-1A performance information

include performance only for periods afer the effective date of the fud's registration

statement. Including performance information prior to the effective date of a fud's

3 Adviser Series will include in, or incorporate -by reference into, its initial registration

statement on Form N-1A, the financial statements of Aspen Series and the financial

Items 9

highlights of

the Retirement Classes of Aspen Series to satisfy the requirements of

Form N-1A. The financial statements will be prepared in accordance with, and

cover the periods required by, Regulation S-X, Aricles 3 and 6, and Rule 30d-l under the

Series and financial highlights of the

1940 Act. Audited financial statements of Aspen

and 22 of

Retirement Classes of Aspen Series for the period since the Aspen Series previous audited

financial statements and financial highlights though the date ofthe Planed Reorganzation

will be added to the Adviser Series registration statement on a timely basis. Adviser Series

wil include in, or, if appropriate, incorporate by reference into, subsequent fiings the

financial statements of Aspen Series and financial highlights of the Retirement Classes of

Aspen Series for all periods required by Regulation S-X and Form N-IA.

Douglas 1. Scheidt, Esq.

Associate Director and Chief Counsel

Division of Investment Management

Securties and Exchange Commission

July 17, 2000

Page 6

r

t

t

registration statement could be viewed as a violation of Section 34(b) of the 1940 Act,

Section 206 of

the Advisers Act and/or Se.ion 5(b) of

the 1933 Act.

Requested

IV. The Relief

We seek the Staf s assurance that it would not

recommend enforcement action under

Section 5(b) of the 1933 Act, Section 34(b) of the 1940 Act or Section 206 of the Advisers

Act, if, when calculating performance information, Adviser Series were to include the

performance of the Retirement Classes. In addition to any other required disclosure, Adviser

Series would disclose in presenting its performance inormation that its Funds were

previously organzed as the Retirement Classes. of Aspen Series, that performance

information includes performance durg that period, and the date each Fund commenced

operations.

As we explain below, we believe that Adviser Series is obligated - and in any case

should be permitted - to car over the performance of the Retirement Classes because the

Planed Reorganization is not a fundamental change in the Retirement Classes. In fact,

stripping the Retirement Classes of

their performance history and requiring their successor,

Adviser Series, to state that it has no performance history would be unair to curent

Retirement Class shareholders, misleading to new investors, and inconsistent with prior noaction letters.

v. Analysis

A. Adviser Series Is Required to Use the Performance History ofthe Retirement

Classes.

We believe that when Adviser Series calculates its performance information, it should

include the performance of its predecessor, the Retirement Classes. Otherwse, curent

shareholders of the Retirement Classes would see the performance information of their

chosen investment options wiped away. That investment performance record is important

to shareholders - both the retirement plan sponsors, who select the investment options

available to paricipants, and to the plan paricipants themselves, who must select and

monitor the investment options designed to fud their retirement needs. Eliminating the

performance history would also he potentially misleading to new investors. Doing so would

suggest that Adviser Series was staed from scratch, and it would ignore the performance

of its predecessors, the Retirement Classes.

Douglas J. Scheidt, Esq.

Associate Director and Chief Counsel

Investment Management

Division of

Securties and Exchange Commssion

July 17, 2000

Page 7

t

t

t

Caring forward the Retirement Classes performance to Adviser Series is also

consistent with no-action precedent. Tbe Sta has repeatedly declared that "it is

inappropriate to exclude performance inormation except in cert limited cases in which

a fud undergoes a fudamental change in operations." Quest for Value Dual PUfose Fund

these types of

"fudamenta change" include:

(pub. avaiL. Feb. 28, 1997). Examples of

a new investment adviser unaffliated with the previous investment adviser, see

Unified Funds (pub. avaiL. Apr. 23, 1991); Philadelphia Fund. Inc. (pub. avaiL.

Oct. 17, 1989);

a change from a tax-exempt money market fud to an asset allocation fud, see

John Hancock Asset Allocation Trust (pub. avaiL. Jan. 3, 1991); and

a change from an unanaged unt investment trst to a managed open-end

investment company, see Founders Fund. Inc. (pub. avaiL. Oct. 15, 1990).

In contrast, none of the followig situations constituted a fudamental change justifying the

abandonment of performance history:

a new investment adviser having common offcers with the prior investment

adviser, see Zweig Series Trust (pub. avaiL. Jan. 10, 1990);

a change in investment strategies, see Fairmont Fund Trust (pub. avaiL. Dee, 9,

1988); and

a change from a closed-end fud to an open-end fud where that change is

unaccompaned by any material change in the fud's investment program or

management, see Comstock Parers Strategy Fund. Inc. (púb. avaiL. Apr. 6,

1995).

The Planed Reorganzation in no way resembles the types of fudamental changes

described above that justify a fud abandoning its past performance. Adviser Series will

operate as the continuation of the Retirement Classes with no material change in investment

program or management. Aside from the change in name and their receipt and consideration

of a proxy solicitation in connection with the Planed Reorganzation, Retirement Class

shareholders may be hard-pressed to notice any change in operations, let alone a fudamental

change. Without such a fudamental change, Adviser Series should continue using the

Retirement Classes' performance history.

Douglas J. Scheidt, Esq.

Associate Director and Chief Counsel

Division of Investment Management

Securties and Exchange Commission

July 17, 2000

Page 8

r

t

f

In fact, to conclude otherwse would raise the specter of the very abuses that the

Commission sought to prevent though the-tandardized performance requirements of

Rule

482 and that the Sta seeks to prevent by requiring that fuds reta their performance

records even when they make non-fudamental changes. A multiple class fud with poor

performance that wished to abandon that performance could do so in par by spinng off a

class into a new fud. That "new" fud could then star with.a clean performance slate and

no obligation to inform investors of its prior poor performance history. This would be

exactly the type of situation the Staff

has sought to avoid in the rio-action letters cited above.

B. Even if Not Required. Adviser Series Should Be Permitted to Use the

Performance of the Retirement Classes.

Even if

the Adviser Series was not required to car over the Retirement Classes'

performance, it should be permitted to do so. A number of no-action letters permt a

successor fud to car over predecessor fud performance. As we discuss below, those

letters also support caring over performance in connection with the Planed

Reorganzation.

In determining whether a new fud may use the historical performance of a

predecessor fud, the Stahas put paricular emphasis on the resemblance between the new

fud and any predecessor fud. For example, in Nort American Securty Trust (pub. avaiL.

Aug. 5, 1994), which involved the merger of several predecessor fuds into one fud, the

Staff addressed which of the predecessor fuds, if any, should provide the performance data

to the new fud. The Staff stated in this context:

"In determining whether a suriving fud, or a new fud resulting from a

reorganzation, may use the historical performance of one of several

predecessor fuds, fuds should compare the attibutes of the suriving or

new fud and the predecessor fuds to determine which predecessor fud, if

fud most closely resembles. Among other factors,

any, the suriving or new

fuds should compare the various fud's investment advisers; investment

objectives, policies, and restrctions; expense strctues and expense ratios;

asset size; and fud composition."

Consideration of these factors demonstrates that Adviser Series resembles the

Retirement Classes in all material respects. Prior to the Planed Reorganzation, Adviser

Series will have no assets and no performance history. After the reorganzation, the Adviser

Series Funds wil have the same investment adviser; the same investment objectives,

ratios; the same asset size,

policies, and restrictions; the same expense strctues and expense

Douglas 1. Scheidt, Esq.

Associate Director and Chief Counsel

Division of Investment Management

Securties and Exchange Commssion

July i 7, 2000

Page 9

r

t

t

and substatially the same portfolio composition as the Retirement Classes. Although the

Adviser Series Funds wiii intially be smaHr than the Aspen Series Funds, Janus Capital

does not believe that fact will have a material effect on portolio management or performance

because its trading practices allow it to allocate trades effciently, even with smaller Funds.

Accordingly, Adviser Series should be permitted to use the Retirement Classes' performance

history .

In MassMutual Institutional Funds (pub. avaiL. Sept. 28, 1995), the Staf granted no-

action relief to permit certn fuds to use the performance data of predecessor separate

investment accounts ("SIAs"). The SIAs were not registered under the Investment Company

Act of 1940, and the new fuds were not treated as successors to the SIAs for accounting

puroses. Nonetheless, the new fuds were "effectively ... continuations of' the SIAs

because they acquired the SIAs' assets. In granting relief, the Staff emphasized its reliance

on the fuds' representations that each fud would be "managed in a maner that is in all

material respects equivalent to the management of the corresponding" separate investment

account, and that the fuds "were created for puroses entirely unelated to the establislient

of a performance record."

These same factors miltate in favor of granting the requested relief in the present

the

case. As we have described, Adviser Series is in all material respects the continuation of

Retirement Classes and wil continue to operate the new Funds in the same maner. The

Retirement Classes are par of a registered investment company and are subject to the same

restrctions imposed by the 1940 Act as those that will be imposed on the new Funds.

Moreover, Janus Capital and Aspen Series have proposed the reorganzation not to establish

a performance record - which the Retirement Classes already have - but to eliminate an

impediment to the Retirement Classes' abilty to meet their investors' needs and to sell their

investors. For these reasons, the Stafs reasoning in MassMutual

also supports granting the relief sought here.4 .

shares to other types of

4 Because Adviser Series will operate as the continuation of the Retirement Classes, the

performance information in connection with "clone"

Staffs position regarding the use of

fuds does not apply here. In three i 997 no-action letters, the staff permitted fuds to

include in advertisements and supplementa sales literatue performance information about

private accounts or mutual fuds managed in the same maner as the fuds being offered by

the advertisements or supplemental sales literatue. Pursuant to those no-action letters, the

performance information must be accompaned by the performance of the fud itself.

Nicholas-Applegate Mutual Funds (pub. avaiL. Feb. 7,1997); GE Funds (pub. avaiL. Feb. 7,

(continued... )

Douglas J. Scheidt, Esq.

Associate Director and Chief Counsel

Division of Investment Management

Securties and Exchange Commission

July 17, 2000

Page 10

t

t

t

Unlike the sitution described in the-bove no-action letters, the Retirement Classes

consist of one class of Aspen Series, and Aspen Series' other classes - the Institutional

Classes and the Service Classes - will continue to exist, be offered to investors, and have a

performance history. In our view, however, this distinction should not afect the analysis.

the Retirement Classes, the Institutional Classes and

Most importtly, since the inception of

Retirement Classes have had different performance histories and different net asset values

their differences in fee strctue. The recently created Service Classes also have

because of

different performance histories and different net asset values than the other two classes.

Each of the three classes is offered pursuant to a separate prospectus and is directed toward

different groups of investors. Each prospectus provides different performance inormation.

The Planed Reorganzation will not afect the performance inormation of the Investment

Classes or the Service Classes. Meanwhile, each Adviser Series Fund will have the same

investment composition as the corresponding Aspen Series Fund had prior to the

reorganzation and wil continue to be managed in the same way.

C. Caring Over the Performance Would Be Permitted in the Analogous

Sitution With a Master-Feeder Arangement.

If Aspen Series had been established as a master-feeder arangement, rather than a

multiple class arangement, performance would car over though a similar reorganzation.

Suppose that the Retirement Class of each Aspen Series Fund were a feeder fud whose

investment policies permit it to seek its investment objective either through direct investment

in the appropriate securties or through investment in a master fud with the same investment

objective. Suppose this hypothetical "Retirement Feeder Fund" invests in the also

(...continued)

1997); ITT Harford Mutual Funds (pub. avaiL. Feb. 7, 1997). For example, ITT Harford

Mutual Funds involved new retal mutul fuds that were designed as clones of existing

insurance products fuds. There was no reorganzation of the existing insurance products

fuds to the new retal fuds,

fuds. No assets were transferred from the insurance products

and no shareholders of the insurance products fuds became shareholders of the new retail

fuds. In those three letters, the Staf distinguished MassMutual because it involved a

reorganzation where the new fud was a successor to the previous fud. Just as in

MassMutul, the Planed Reorganzation will involve a transfer of assets from the

predecessor fud to the successor fud, which will have the same shareholders, the same

adviser and the same investment program.

Douglas 1. Scheidt, Esq.

Associate Director and Chief Counsel

Investment Management

Division of

Securties and Exchange Commission

July 17, 2000

Page 11

t

t

t

hypothetical "Aspen Master Fund." (The Aspen Master Fund also sells its shares to the

hypothetical "Institutional Feeder Fund" and "Service Feeder Fund.") At some point the

Retiement Feeder Fund determnes that it is in its best interest to invest directly in the

appropriate securities. It accomplishes this change by acquirig the same portolio of

securties that it previously owned indirectly through the Aspen MaSter Fund. If ths were

the sole change, the Retirement Feeder Fund would not - and could not - abandon its

performance history. That is because the Retirement Feeder Fund would continue to exist

and there would have been no fudamental change.

The Staffhas made clear on previous occasions that "(i)t is the policy of the Division

of Investment Management to treat master-feeder and multiple class arangements

comparably, uness there is a compellng reason not to do so." IDS Financial Corp. (pub.

avaiL. Dec. 19, 1994), at n.6; see also Exemption for Open-End Management Investment

Companes Issuing Multiple Classes of Shares: Disclosure by Multiple Class and MasterFeeder Funds: Class Voting: on Distrbution Plans, Inv. Co. ReI. No. 20915 (Feb. 23, 1995)

(Rule 18f-3 adopting release) (noting that "master-feeder strctues are fuctionally similar

to multiple class fuds" and adopting "disclosure requirements (that) apply equally to

multiple Class and master-feeder fuds"). The Planed Reorganization is substatially

car over if Aspen

similar to this master-feeder hypothetical. Just as performance should

Series were organzed in a master-feeder arangement, performance should car over in its

multiple class arangement. There is no compellng reason to treat the two differently.

D. Granting No-Action Relief Here Wil Not Enable New Investment

Companes to Create Misleading Performance Information.

The Commission and Staff have expressed concern about the use by investment

advisers of "incubator fuds" and similar methods to generate misleading performance

information for new fuds. As the Staff explained in MassMutual' "(t)he 'requirement that

stadardized performance data not include periods prior to a fud's registration is intended

in par to preclude an adviser from establishing a number of fuds for the puroses of

generating performance data, and then registering those 'incubator fuds' with the best

performance records so that the newly registered fuds can use that performance." As noted

in MassMutual, the adopting release to the 1988 amendments to Rule 482 stated that a fud

could not advertise performance information prior to the effectiveness of its registration

statement because "fuds are likely to be managed differently before they are offered to the

public." Advertising by Investment Companes, Inv. Co. Act ReI. No. 16245 (Feb. 2,1988).

~

The Planed Reorganzation does not involve any potential for these types of abuses.

The Retirement Classes have been publicly offered and available to qualified plans since

Douglas J. Scheidt, Esq.

Associate Director and Chief Counsel

Investment Management

Division of

Securties and Exchange Commission

July 17, 2000

Page 12

r

t

t

May 1997, and has grown to more than $380 milion in assets. The Retirement Classes'

curent shareholders will remain shareholders of Adviser Series. No change in investment

practices will occur because of the Planed Reorganzation, and expenses canot increase

for at least thee years afer the reorganzation. In addition, as discussed earlier, the Planed

Reorganzation is not intended to establish a performance record - which the Retirement

Classes already have - but to eliminate a restriction on the types of investors that may choose

the Retirement Classes. Under these circumstances, the types' of abuses that the Commssion

seeks to prevent canot arse.

Conclusion

provide its

For the reasons stated in ths letter, we respectfuly request that the Sta

assurance that it wil not recommend enforcement action to the Commission if Adviser

Series calculates and presents performance information as proposed.

Please contact us if we can provide any additional information.

Yours trly,

Chrstopher E. Palmer

Michael K. Isenman