UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Agency decision

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Release No. 80233 / March 13, 2017

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

File No. 3-16575

In the Matter of

Computer Sciences Corporation, Michael

Laphen, Michael Mancuso, Wayne Banks,

Claus Zilmer, and Paul Wakefield

NOTICE OF PROPOSED PLAN OF

DISTRIBUTION AND OPPORTUNITY

FOR COMMENT

Respondents.

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to Rule 1103 of the United States Securities and Exchange

Commission’s (“Commission”) Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans (“Rules”), 17 C.F.R.

§ 201.1103, that the Division of Enforcement has submitted to the Commission a proposed plan

(“Plan”) for the distribution of monies placed into a Fair Fund in the above-captioned matter.

On June 5, 2015, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Public Administrative and

Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933, Sections 4C

and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 102(e) of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order

(“Order”)1 against Computer Sciences Corporation (“CSC”), Michael Laphen (“Laphen”), Michael

Mancuso (“Mancuso”), Wayne Banks (“Banks”), Claus Zilmer, and Paul Wakefield (collectively,

the “Respondents”). The Order found that CSC engaged in a wide-ranging accounting and

disclosure fraud that materially overstated its earnings and concealed from investors significant

problems with its largest contract. The Order required CSC to pay a civil money penalty of

$190,000,000.00, Laphen to pay a civil money penalty of $750,000.00.00, Mancuso to pay a civil

money penalty of $175,000.00 and Banks to pay disgorgement of $10,990.00 and prejudgment

interest of $2,400.00. The Order also created a Fair Fund pursuant to Section 308(a) of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, for the monies paid by the Respondents for the

distribution to harmed investors (“Fair Fund”).

1

Securities Act Rel. No. 9804 (June 5, 2015).

Additionally, in two related district court actions, Wilfred Robert Sutcliffe (“Sutcliffe”)

was ordered to pay disgorgement of $6,003.33 and prejudgment interest of $1,060.622 and Edward

Parker (“Parker”) was ordered to pay disgorgement of $2,800.00 and prejudgment interest of

$750.003 to the Commission, and for the monies received to be transferred into the Fair Fund.

In total, $190,948,983.954 was paid into the Fair Fund. The Fair Fund is subject to the

continuing jurisdiction and control of the Commission and has been deposited into an interestbearing account at the United States Department of the Treasury.

OPPORTUNITY FOR COMMENT

Pursuant to this Notice, all interested persons are advised that they may obtain a copy of the

Plan from the Commission’s public website at http://www.sec.gov/litigation/fairfundlist.htm.

Interested persons may also obtain a written copy of the Plan by submitting a written request to

Nancy Chase Burton, Esq., United States Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE,

Washington, DC 20549-5876. All persons who desire to comment on the Plan may submit their

comments, in writing, no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Notice:

1.

to the Office of the Secretary, United States Securities and Exchange Commission,

100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090;

2.

by using the Commission’s Internet comment form

(http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin.shtml); or

3.

by sending an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov.

Comments submitted should include “Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-16575” in the subject

line. Comments received will be publicly available. Persons should submit only information that

they wish to make publicly available.

THE PLAN

The Fair Fund is comprised of $190,948,983.95 in disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and

civil penalties paid by Respondents, Sutcliffe and Parker. The Commission’s Order arose out of

securities law violations and substantially similar facts and occurred during the same time period as

those in a related class action (“Class Action”).5 The Fund Administrator6 for this Fair Fund was

also the claims administrator in the Class Action, and has compiled a list of all persons and entities

that potentially purchased or acquired Eligible Securities from August 5, 2008 through December

27, 2011, inclusively (the “Relevant Period”).

2

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Wilfred Sutcliffe, No. 15-cv-4340 (S.D.N.Y. 2015).

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Edward Parker, No. 15-cv-4341 (S.D.N.Y. 2015).

4

There was a $20.00 shortfall in the amount paid by Sutcliffe, which was written off by the Office of Financial

Management, pursuant to their applicable delegated authority, 17 C.F.R. § 200.30-4(a)(15).

5

In Re Computer Sciences Corporation Securities Litigation, No. 11-cv-00610 (E.D. Va. 2011.).

6

All terms used herein but not defined shall have the same meanings ascribed to them in the Plan.

3

2

The Plan proposes to distribute the Net Available Fair Fund to Eligible Claimants

according to the Plan of Allocation attached as Exhibit B to the Plan. The Plan of Allocation for

the Fair Fund is substantially similar to the plan of allocation in the Class Action, and the

calculations are based on records obtained from CSC and certain other entities that were

shareholders of record during the Relevant Period.

The Plan involves a claims process for some investors, as described in detail in the Plan.

However, all Class Action Authorized Claimants, those who filed an approved claim in the Class

Action, are automatically deemed Eligible Claimants without filing a claim, but only as to the

transactions approved in their Class Action claim. If a Class Action Authorized Claimant wishes

to amend their claim to include additional transactions, they must submit a claim for such

additional transactions. Other potentially eligible investors must submit a Proof of Claim Form or

cure the deficiencies identified in the claim they filed in the Class Action. The Plan provides that

the Fund Administrator shall mail to all persons and entities in their database, their applicable

Notice, within forty-five (45) days of the Commission’s approval of the Plan, which identifies their

eligibility status and whether a claim needs to be filed and/or if supporting documentation is

needed to participate in the Plan’s distribution.

For the Commission, by its Secretary, pursuant to delegated authority.

Brent J. Fields

Secretary

3

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.