Private Foundation Information Returns, 1982
Agency decision
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
Private Foundation Information Returns, 1982
By Margaret Riley*
I
Private foundation giving to philanthropic
organizations rose by $1.6 billion between 1979
and 1982 El 1.
The $4.4 billion in contributions, gifts and grants (hereafter referred to
as "grants") awarded by the 23,306 grantmaking
private foundations represents an inflationadjusted real increase of nearly 25 percent
over grant payouts made in 1979, the last year
for which statistics are available [2].
(See
Table 1 for data on the various categories of
private foundations. )
These grants helped to
support charitable programs and research in the
areas of health, education, science, the arts,
community devel opment,
social
services
and
other causes deemed to serve the public good.
In 'addition to making a small number of
grants, 3,105 "operating" foundations actively
conducted
charitable
programs
and
provided
direct services as a means of carrying out
their
philanthropic
mission.
Operating
foundations, as a condition of such status, are
required to expend substantially all of their
income directly for the active conduct of their
exempt purposes.
In contrast, "nonoperating"
foundations
carry
out
exempt
(charitable)
activities in an indirect manner by making
grants to other organizations that carry out
these activities.
Approximately 3,300, or 13 percent, of the
25,363 nonoperating foundations did not make
any grants for 1982.
However, the majority
were small organizations, and about 75 percent
of them set aside funds eamarked for future
charitable
projects,
made
program-rel ated
investments, or incurred qualifying expenses
for charitable purposes which met or exceeded
the required minimum distribution for 1982.
It
should also be noted that many nonoperating
foundations which do not make
grants were
formerly classified by the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS)
as public charities.
If an
organization fails to meet IRS' requirements
for retaining its public charity status, that
organization is
reclassified
as a
private
foundation.
Most often,
these reclassified
organizations continue to operate as public
charities,
operating
programs
or providing
direct services as opposed to making grants to
accomplish a charitable purpose.
*Foreign Special Projects Section.
Marvin Schwartz, Acting Chief.
For 1982, it is estimated that there were
28,468
ac ti ve
p ri vate
foundations
(both
grantmaking and nongrantmaking), an overall
growth of 1.7 percent over 1979. The growth of
foundations in asset classes of $100,000 and
above increased at successively higher rates
with each graduated asset bracket. This i-s not
Size of
Fair Market
.Value of Assets
Total
Number of
Private
Foundations'
-T_9T9_
1982
Percent
Change,
1979
to 1982
27,980
28,468
1.7
Under $100,0002 ... 15,632
14,752
-5. 6*
$100,000 under
$1,000,000 ......
8,616
9,125
5. 9_
$1,000,000 under
$10,000,000 .....
3,131
3,771
20.4
$10,000,000 under
$50,000,000 .....
486
655
34.8
$50,000,000
or more .........
115
165
43.5
*Estimate should be u-sed with caution because
of the small sample size for this asset bracket.
'Includes fomer public charities reclassified
as private foundations.
21ncludes returns with assets zero or unreported.
surprising as many organizations that were in a
lower asset class in 1979 grew into a higher
class by 1982. In the asset range of less than
$100,000, there appears to be a 5.6-percent
decrease in the number of foundations.
However, because of the small number of returns
studied with assets below $100,000,
this
apparent decline also could be attributed to
sampling variability. (See the coefficients of
variation explained in the "Data Sources and
Limitations" section of this article.) [31
The Ford Foundation clearly maintained its
position- as the front-runner in tems of the
Prepared under the direction of
I
Private Foundations, 1982
2
I
size of asset holdings and amount of grants
awarded [4]. While Ford remained well ahead of
all other foundations, some foundations had
assets in, or near, the billion-dollar range.
Excluding the J. Paul Getty Museum Trust, which
is classified- as an operating foundation and
for 1982 had nearly $2 billion in assets,
Figure A lists foundations which reported fair
market value of assets above $500 million.
Also provided in Figure*A are data on ledger
assets, grants paid, and the 5-year carryover
of distributions made in excess of the amount
required. These 11 largest organizations held
19.2 percent of all assets owned by private
foundations, and were responsible for 8.6
percent of the dollar value of all grants paid.
FIT5-re-W
as,
P.-tiva-09 0.0010-
IN111ro-5
Rank
Name
I Ford Foundation
Excess
FMV Ledger Grants Distribuillons
Assets Assets Paid
Carryover
3,529.2 3,529.2
103.9
8.0
3.9
A310TO
3 Andrew W. Mellon Foundation
1.089.7
774.2
59.3
990.3
707.5
22.3
847.9
211.2
27.0
9 Kresge Foundation
681.5
519.2
8.9
11 Carnegie Corporation of N.Y.
511.3
416.7
13.4
5 The MacArthur Foundation
3.1
The four foundations listed which show no
excess distributions carryover did not distribute the minimum amount required for 1982
because they first had to apply a portion of
amounts
their
1982
distributions
against
remaining undistributed from 1981. Foundations
have unti l the end of thei r next, tax year to
distribute the minimum amount required for the
current year before they are liable for the
excise tax levied on undi stri buted income.
This 1-year grace period provides to foundations the opportunity to plan systematically
their grantmaking activity to correspond with
their investment performance.
To measure private foundation philanthropic
giving, the contributions reported by foundati ons on returns filed with the Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) for 1982 were compared to
those reported to IRS by all other private
sources [5]. Foundations accounted for approximately one dollar out-of every ten contributed
from a private donor.
Type of Donor
Contributions
Billions)
Percent
of Total
45.11
34.05
4.43
2.91
2.25
1.42
100.0%
75.5
9.8
6.5
5.0
3.1
Total
Individuals [61
Foundations [71
Corporations [81
Bequests [91
Trusts & Estates (101
NOTE: Detail may not add to total due to
rounding.
Government social welfare expenditures, a
measure of public philanthropy compiled by the
Social Security Administration [111, can also
be used as a comparative base to show the
magnitude of public versus private support for
The amount of social
philanthropic programs.
welfare expenditures for Fiscal Year 1982,
adjusted to xclude $302.6 bi.llion for social
security insurance benefit payments, was $291.8
billion. These public expenditures were about
6 times greater than total private contributions and about 66 times greater than the
contributions of private foundations~
and
direct
operating
If
administrative
expenses incurred in the conduct of foundations' charitable purposes are added to the
amount of the contributions they paid out, the
resulting total charitable expenditures of all
Comfoundations for 1982 were $5.2 billion.
pared to the Gross National Product (GNP) for
1982, Government social welfare expenditures
(minus the social security pqrtion) comprised
9.5 percent of GNP while private foundation
charitable expenditures were less than 0.2 percent of GNP. However, the nature of systematic
foundation funding provides an opportunity for
initiating innovative research, programs, and
test projects which-the Government cannot undertake because of political, legislative, or
In the wake of recent
budgetary constraints.
many
Government-supported
budget
cuts
in
programs, some foundations are thinking more
Although
about publ ic-pri vate partnerships.
they do not believe their role should be solely
one of filling Federal philanthropic spending
foundations foresee situations
gaps,
these
where the formation of creative public-private
partnerships to devise new approaches to social
needs can produce positive results [121.
CHARACTERISTICS
UNIVERSE
OF
THE
PRIVATE
FOUNDATION
A private foundation is a nonprofit corporation, association or trust with a narrow source
of funds which operates or supports social,
educational, scientific, charitable, religious
I
Private Foundations, 1982
and other programs dedicated to improving the
general welfare of society. By IRS definition,
a private foundation is an organization which
qualifies for tax exempt status under Internal
Revenue Code section 501(c)(3) and is not a
research
church;
school;
hospital; medical
organization; an organization with broad public
support (public charity); an organization which
is operated by, or in connection with, any of
the above described organizations; or an organization which tests for public safety.
The
primary difference between foundations and
public charities lies in the sources of their
funding.
Foundations usually receive their
funds from an individual, a family or a corporation, while, as their name implies, public
charities' funds are derived mainly from a
large number of sources within the general
public.
Another distinction of a private foundation
is that it primarily makes grants to other
nonprofit organizations, such as public charities, rather than directly operating its own
charitable programs.
(An exception is the
operating foundation which is described below.)
As noted earlier, some organizations which are
classified as private foundations were formerly
public charities whose status as such was
revoked because they failed-to maintain the
required minimum of support from public sources.
While classified as private foundations, they
generally
continue
to
operate
as
public
charities.
Foundations form a diverse community distinguished by a wide range of characteristics,
including asset size; sources of support; size
of managing staff; type of control; and grant
size, type, and recipient.
Foundations can be
classified into two broad categories, operating
While the great majority of
and nonoperating.
foundations are nonoperating (generally grantmaking) organizations, some use their funds to
actively operate charitable programs, rarely
making
contributions
or
grants
to
other
organizations.
These are called operating
foundations.
Nonoperating foundations include independent
and company-sponsored foundations.
Independent
foundations can be general-purpose, specialpurpose
or family foundations
[131.
The
general -purpose foundation supports a broad
endeavors
while
the
range
of
charitable
special-purpose
foundation
concentrates
on
limited fields of interest. Family foundations
are established with a gift from a single donor
and are operated or controlled by members of
the donor's family.
Sane large independent
foundations operate with staffs whose members
are unrelated to the foundation's donor(s).
All of the domestic foundations listed in
Figure A are independent foundations.
Company foundations are closely related to
the torporations which sponsor them.
Many of
their grants support charitable activities and
improvement projects in the locality in which
the company is based, or are made to tax-exempt
organizations to conduct charitable research in
areas related to the company's interests.
Although
contributions
to
company-sponsored
foundations usually correspond to the profits
of the corporation, i.e., more corporate giving
in good years and less in poor years, they have
the ability to maintain and control their
endowment in a way to provide a steady flow of
grants, even when corporate profits are down.
Alcoa Foundation, General Motors Foundation,
and Western Electric Fund are three of the
largest company-sponsored foundations.
Community foundations are established to make
grants for nonprofit programs conducted in a
specific community or region [141.
Although
largely publicly supported by the citizens and
businesses of the community, and therefore
excluded from IRS' private foundation definition (and also from the statistics presented
in this report), community foundations account
for a
respectable portion of
grantmaking
philanthropic activity in the private sector.
For example, 234 community foundations for 1982
made grants estimated at $233.8 million, an
amount equal to 5.0 percent of total foundation
giving [151.
It should be noted, however, that
$102.2 million of total community foundation
grants can be attributed solely to the San
Francisco Foundation, the New York Community
Trust,
the Cleveland Foundation,
and
the
Chicago Community Trust.
FINANCIAL DATA AND CHARITABLE DISTRIBUTIONS
The $47.2 billion in market value assets of
the 820 largest private foundations, those with
asset holdings of $10 million or more, comp ri sed 75 percent of all assets held by
foundations for 1982. In contrast, 84 percent
of the foundation population, holding assets
worth less than $1 million, accounted for only
6 percent of the total, or $3.7 billion (see
Figure B).
Assets of all foundations rose by
41
percent between 1979 and 1982.
Total
receipts
increased
by
52
percent,
while
The resulting
deductions rose by 65 percent.
net income (less deficit) for 1982 was $3.3
billion, a growth of 33 percent from 1979
[161.
The graphic
PtS, depiction of aggregate
recei
assets
(fair
market
foundation
value) , and grants paid in Figure C shows that
constant dollar increases in these financial
data were 19, 11, and 23 percent, respectively.
Sources of Income and Deductions
Dividend and interest income was the largest
source of foundation receipts for 1982. While
Private Foundations, 1982
4
Itigure B
Number of Foundations and Their Assets, By Size
of Total Fair Market Value of Assets, 1982
(Money amou nts are In billions of dollars)
Percent of Total
'
901
Size of Assets
r__l Under $1,000,000
r__J $1,000,000 under $10,000,000
= $10,000,000 under $50,000,000
= $50,000,00.0 or more
$10 million was nearly equally split between
interest and dividend income and contributions. The reliance upon contributions from
outside sources as a major form of support is
more common for small organizations. As thei r
assets increase, foundations usually develop
larger and more diverse investment portfolios,
freeing them from dependence on large amounts
of contributions. Most large foundations have
received a single substantial bequest or
endowment which serves as their primary base
from which to produce income and further
increase their assets. These endowed foundations rely on their investments to produce
income and, therefore, do not need to depend
heavily on the'receipt of contributions.
The most significant shift in the composition
of total income, shown in Figure D, between
1979 and 1982 occurred in sales of capital
assets and in contributions, gifts and grants
received.
The increase in sales of capital
assets possibly indicates that foundations are
beginning to restructure thei r investment
portfolios, a newfound freedom made available
by a 1981 tax law change which eliminated the
requirement for foundations to pay out all of
income
for
charitable
their
investment
purposes.
(The effect of the law change is
explained more fully in- the "Composition of
Assets" section of this article.)
4easure of Total Receipts, Total Assets, and
Grants Paid, 1979 and 1982
1979
1982
1982 in constant
1979 dollars
5
TotAl
Receipts
Fair Market
Vaiup Assets
Grants Paid
these items together also ranked as the numberone income source for the large foundations,
contributions dominated as the leading income
source for organizations with assets under
$1 million. The primary source of receipts for
foundations with assets of $1 million to
Because of a 1981 IRS return fom change in
the method of reporting dividends and inierest,
these income items individually cannot be colnpared between 1979 and 1982. For 1982, total
interest was reported separately either, as
amounts received from securities investments
(which also included dividends received from
savings
received from
stocks)
or amounts
accounts and temporary cash investments, such
as certificates of deposit, money market funds,
and U.S. Treasury bills that mature in less
than one year. 'Taken as an aggregate amount,
receipts
the proportion of total
however,
attributable to dividend and interest income
for 1982 remained virtually unchanged from 1979.
The average annual prime rate charged by banks
was 12.7 percent in 1979, rose erratically to
18.9 percent in 1981, and then steadily deDuring
clined to 14.9 percent in 1982 [171.
the same period, corporate profits (in current
dollars) fell 30 percent to their lowest level
since 1976 [181.
Economic conditions leading
up to, and including, the harsh recession of
1982 contributed to the decline in profits,and
likely resulted in dividends on stocks which
were lower than they would have been in a
Despite the fluctanonrecessionary period.
tions in interest rates and dividends paid on
investments, the amount of foundation dividend
and interest income rose by $1.4 billion
between 1979 and 1982.
Compared to the investment income received by
from
interest
and
dividends,
individuals
Private Foundations, 1982
reported separately from total expenses because
the IRS recognizes, as a qualifying distribution for purposes of meeting the required
minimum payout, only the part of an expense
item allocable to charitable purposes
(as
opposed to the production of income or other
noncharitable purposes).
Effective with Tax
Year 1985, Congress placed a cap on the amount
of administrative expenses incurred in making
grants which a foundation can apply as a
qualifying
distribution.
The Treasury
Department has been mandated to conduct a study
of foundation administrative expenses and to
submit findings to Congress upon its completion.
Figure D
Major Sources of Income, 1979 and 1982
Dividends and
Interest from
Securities
Other
Interest from
Savings and
Temporary
Investments
foundations fared much worse in the rate at
which these items grew from 1979 to 1982.
Foundation income from these sources increased
56 percent, from $2.4 billion to $3.8 billion,
at the same time as the increase for individuals was 94 percent, from $108.9 billion to
$211.1 billion.
The investment outlook for
foundations should improve after 1982 because
of the law change mentioned above which freed
them from the constraint of having to distribute all of their interest and dividend
income each year.
(For an explanation of how
the law change affected the structure of
foundation
investment
portfolios,
see the
discussion of the "total return" philosophy in
the "Composition of Asset" section of this
article.)
Foundations must report both total expenses
as recorded on their books of account, and the
part of those expenses which can be attributed
to the direct conduct of their charitable
mission. Charitable-purpose expenditures are
Depreciation and depletion are allowed as
deductions on a foundation's books, but may not
be treated as a charitable-purpose expenditure
because the entire cost of a charitable-use
asset is treated as a qualifying distribution
when the asset is acquired. Figure E shows
nonoperating foundation expenses as reported on
thei r
books
and
di stributions
for
their
charitable purposes.
The portion of nonoperating
foundations'
expenses which was
directly related to activities which constituted their charitable purposes totalled
$4.7 billion.
For ease of comparison, the
three categories of nonoperati ng foundation
asset sizes shown in the figure are described
as small, medium, and large. Across all three
asset sizes, contributions, gifts and grants
made up the largest single share of total
expenses, reported both on the books and as a
charitable disbursement. More than 93 percent
of aggregate charitable-purpose expenses were
in the fom of grants paid.
A distant second
to grants was "other expenses," at 2.4 pement
of total charitable disbursements.
The remaining eight categories of itemized expenses
accounted altogether for only 4.2 percent of
the total.
The
rati o
of
di rect
charitabl e-purpose
expenditures to expenses reported on the books
reveal s
different
charitable
di stri buti on
patterns for the three foundation sizes. Small
foundations have much lower ratios for the
three categories related to paid staff--officer
compensation,
other salaries, and employee
benefits
(including pension plan contributions).
Since small foundations usually are
operated by volunteers and fund programs of
smaller size, they do not have the personnel
expenses of larger foundations for reviewing
grant proposals, administrative record-keeping
of grant programs, and research and ongoing
involvement
grantmaking
program
in
new
activities.
Medi um si ze foundations claimed a larger
percentage of their interest expense as a
di rect
charitable
expenditure.
This
is
probably due to the fact that, in proportion to
their total assets, medium foundations hold
approximately two-to-three times more land,
Private Foundations, 1982
Expenses Per Books (EPB), Disbursements for Charitable
Figure E.--Nonoperating Foundations:
Purposes (DCP), and Ratio of Charitable Disbursements to Expenses Per Books, by Size of Total Fair
Market Value of Assets, 1982
Monev amounts are in millions of dollars]
Size of Total
Total
Expense Item
Total expenses .................
...
Contributions, gifts, grants
'
Compensation of officers ..............
Other salaries and wages ............
Pension plans, employee benefits ....
Professional services ...............
Interest ............................
Taxes ...............................
Depreciation and depletion ..........
Occupation ..........................
Other expenses ......................
Expense Item
Total expenses ..................
Contributions, gifts, grants ........
Compensation of officers ............
Other salaries and wages ............
Pension plans, employee benefits ....
Professional services ...............
Interest ............................
Taxes ................................
Depreciation and depletion ..........
Occupation ..........................
Other expenses ......................
EPB
DCP
Ratio
5,260.77
4,423.31
89;80
86.37
25.02
122.13
15.31
153.52
29.68
16.41
299.22
4,670.65
4,364.34
49.50
68.52
17.44
35.69
2.66
6.56
N/A
13.47
112.47
88.8
98.7
55.1
79.3
69.7
29.2
17.4
4.3
N/A
82.1
37.6
Fair Market Value of Assets
Less than $J,UUU10T _
DCP
Ratio
___TTB_
923.07
863.88
8.22
2.86
1.17
12.78
1.44
7.32
1.77
0.94
22.69
875.10
854.76
1.42
1.21
0.23
3.86
0.19
0.91
N/A
0.80
14.90
94.8
98.9
17.3
42.3
19.7
30.2
13.2
12.4
N/A
85.1
65.7
Size of Total Fair Market Value of Assets--continued
$1,000,000
$10,000,000 or more
Under $10,000, 00
DEP
Ratio
EPB
DCP
Ratio
EPB
(7)
1,228.61
1,080.82
23.66
12.77
1.34
33.68
2.13
31.77
6.73
2.55
33.18
__T91_ --rrm- _Fl TT_ --TT 21
, 1,174.20
1,118.16
11.23
10.17
1.23
9.55
0.63
2.14
N/A
1.91
19.17
95.6
103.5
47.5
79.7
91.8
28.4
29.6
6.7
N/A
74.9
57.8
3,109.08
2,478.61
57.93
70.74
.22.51
75.66
11.73
114.43
21.18
12.93
243.36
2,618.35
2,391.42
36.85
57.14
16.00
22.28
2.01
3.51
N/A
10.76
78.39
84.2
96.5
63.6
80.8
71.1
29.4
17.1
3.1
N/A
83.2
32.2
9,
- Not Applicable.
'While foundations are required to use the cash method of accounting to report disbursements for
their charitable purposes, they have an option to use either the cash or accrual method in reporting
expenses on their books. Using the accrual method for expenses on the books can result in a ratio
which exceeds 100 percent.
NOTE: Detail may not add to total because of rounding.
buildings and equipment which are used for
charitable purposes than the other foundation
sizes.
charitable-purpose
The
proportion
of
expenditures allocated by large organizations
for taxes was small in comparison to foundaLarge
other two
groups.
tions
in
the
foundations hold more than twice as much
depreciable investment property compared to the
other foundations, so they pay more in real
Since real estate taxes on
estate taxes.
investment property can be reported as a total
expense item, but are not includable as an
exempt purpose expense item, the ratio for
taxes paid by large foundations is lower than
and medi um si ze
the rati o for the smal 1
The excise tax on investment
foundations.
i ncome paid by all three foundation asset
categories is not deductible by nonoperating
foundations as a charitable-purpose expenditure.
Composition of Assets
Total fair market value of foundation assets
for 1982 showed an increase from 1979 of 41
percent.
Investments in securities constituted
the greatest share of market assets held by
foundations, with holdings of cash placing
second.
Holdings in long-term investments
other than in securities accounted for the next
largest portion of assets.
Private Foundations, 1982
For 1982, foundations held a total investment
in stocks and bonds having a fair market value
of $49.8 billion.
These investments earned
dividends and interest totalling $3.0 billion,
a yield of 6.0 percent. It has been argued by
some that foundations fail to obtain a reasonable rate of return on their stock and bond
To test this argument, a
investments [201.
base for comparison was constructed for 1982
using measures of average yield for composite
investments: 1982 dividend yields on common
stocks of the 500 corporations included in the
Standard and Poor's composite average and the
1982 yield for the composite U.S. Treasury
long-term bond average [211.
Had foundations
invested in these composite assets in the same
proportions as they invested in stocks and
bonds in 1979 (stocks and bonds together were
reported as a single amount on the 1982 information return), they -would have enjoyed a
significantly higher return of 8.5 percent.
However, it was only beginning in 1982 that
foundations could restructure their portfolios
to take advantage of the 1981 law change in the
payout rule.
(See the discussion of the law
change below.)
An examination of yield data for various fair
market value asset distributions revealed that
as asset size increased the yield on security
investments decreased, from a high of 8.9 percent earned by foundations holding assets worth
less than $100,000 to a low of 5.3 percent
earned by those holding assets worth $50
million or more.
This may support the theory
that
the
investment
strategies of
larger
foundations (traditionally more heavily invested in securities than smaller foundations)
were significantly affected by a pre-1982
payout rule which required foundations to
distribute for charitable purposes the greater
of their current investment income or 5 percent
of
thei r investment assets
(both amounts
subject to further adjustments).
Because of the decline in the real value of
foundation securities caused by high inflation
rates and the requirement to pay out their
current investment income (if greater than 5
percent of investment assets), many foundations
opted for a "total return" philosophy on stocks
and bonds which takes into account not only
dividends,
but
also
appreciation.
These
foundations were inclined to hold greater
concentrations of securities which had lower
income yields but the potential for higher
appreciation values.
Under the new payout rule, enacted in late
1981, foundations no longer are required to
make distributions out of current income in
excess
of
5
percent
of their investment
assets.
The new law offers foundations an
opportunity to
restructure their investment
7
portfolios to include securities which produce
higher rates of return. In so doing, yields in
excess of 5 percent could be put back into
their endowments.
While the percent yield on
securities held by larger foundations remains
comparatively low for 1982, the increase in
sales of capital assets mentioned in the
"Sources of Income and Deductions" section
tends to suggest a changing trend in foundation
investment practices.
Market Value
Asset Size
Interest
Investments and Dividend
in
Income From
Securities
Securities Percent
(S Millions) ($ Millions) Yield
Total .......
49,822.6
2,970.2
6.0%
Under
$100,0001 ......
176.9
15.7
8.9
$100,000
under
$1,000,000.....
1,975.8
174.1
8.0
$1,000,000
under
$10,000,000....
8,080.0
566.8
7.8
under
$50,000,000....
10,017.1
646.1
6.5
$50,000,000
or more ......
29,572.8
1,567.5
5.3
$10,000,000
'Includes returns with assets zero or
unreported.
Assets in terms of book value rose at nearly
the same rate as market value assets, by 39
per-cent from 1979 to 1982. Since 1981 was the
first year for which foundations were required
to report their asset components at market
value on the Form 990-PF return, comparisons of
1982 data to earlier years must be presented
using amounts reported on the foundations'
books. Also effective with 1981, the reporting
of securities on the information return was not
required to be separated into stocks, bonds,
and Government obligations as in previous
years. Comparison is therefore limited to the
aggregate amount of securities as reported for
1982. Securities, long the most prominent type
of assets in the portfolios of foundations, continued an upward trend increasing by 89 percent
since 1974 [22]. For all 3 years presented in
the table below, holdings of securities in
terms of their proportion to total assets remained constant at 78 percent.
8
Private Foundations, 1982
Percent
Change,
1979
to 1982
Type of
Asset
Income Year
1974 -1979
1982
T$ B i M'on s) 17
Total ........
25.5
34.7
48.2
39%
SecuritieS2. .. ..
Cash, totaT ....
Savings and
interestbearing
accounts .....
Non-i nterestbearing
accounts ......
Depreciable
assets and
land held for
charitable
purposes .......
Accounts and
notes
receivable .....
Other ...........
19.9
1.2
26.9
2.0
37.4
4.6
39
131
0.8
1.4
4.2
190
0.4
0.6
0.5
-15
ties that were 73 percent higher for 1982 than
they were for 1979.
However, as a ratio to
total assets, liabilities for these 2 years
differed by only 1 percent, with liabilities
for 1979 being 4 percent of assets and for
1982, 5 percent. Traditionally, the proportion
of liabilities has remained relatively low from
year-to-year because foundations normally do
not borrow funds but operate principally using
contributions they recei ve and income from
i nvestments.
(Foundation income from investments which were purchased with borrowed funds
are subject to the unrelated business income
tax under the debt-financed provisions of the
Internal Revenue Code.)
Excise Tax on Net Investment Income
0.3
0.6
1.1
77
1.0
3.1
0.8
4.3
0.9
4.1
22
-5
'Assets used were the book value reported._
'Includes corporate stocks, corporate bonds,
and Government obligations.
The large increase in total cash held by
foundations in general
is
attributable to
savings and temporary cash investments, which
rose by 190 percent between 1979 and 1982. For
foundations with assets of $10 million or more,
Even though a
the increase was 338 percent.
downward trend in interest rates began in
mid-1982, the average
*
annual prime rate was
still significantly higher for 1982 than it was
for 1979,
14.86 percent compared to 12.67
percent.
Still
riding
on
the
thrust
of
interest rates which had reached an all-time
high
during
1981,
foundations
evidently
continued to funnel more income into short-term
investments for 1982.
For foundations with less than $100,000 in
book val ue assets,
hol di ngs of cash and
securities switched their positions of. importance, with cash comprising 41 percent of
assets and securities. ranking second at,-37
percent.
The book value of land and depreciable -assets held for charitable purposes (as
opposed to investment purposes)
also rose
significantly between 1979 and 1982, although.
their dollar amount remained small in relation
to total assets.
There was an increase in all components of
liabilities from 1979 to 1982.
The increases
ranged from 42 percent for mortgages and all
other notes payable to 216 percent for accounts
pay abl e.
Foundations reported total liabili-
Approximately - 24,000 -private
foundations
incurred excise taxes totalling $111.4,million
on their net investment income'for 1982.
The
amount of excise tax reported increased by 78
percent between 1979 and 1982.
The excise tax on net investment income is a
type of "audit" tax levied on foundations under
the Tax Reform Act of 1969 to provide funds for
IRS oversight of foundation activities and
enforcement of laws governing their exempt
status. "Since the excise tax is c6moluted as a
specified
percentage
of
income
earned on
investments
(after
allowance
for
certain
expenses), its burden is borne most heavily by
foundations with mo re successful investment
portfolios [231.
As the asset size of a
foundation grows, it relies more on investments
for the production of income. This results in
larger excise tax payments in proportion to
asset size for the larger foundations.
Charitable Distribut-ions
The
following
discussion
of
foundation
charitable
di stri butions
excludes
operating
foundations. Because they disburse their funds
for the active conduct of charitable projects,
operating foundations are not subject to the
distribution requirement.
All references to
foundations in this section on charitable distributions are for nonoperating foundations.
Private
foundations
are
required
to
distribute
annually
a minimum amount for
charitable purposes.
This computed minimum
amount is based on 5 percent of a monthly
average of
thei r investment assets
after
allowances
are
deducted
for
indebtedness
incurred in acquiring the assets and any cash
reserved for charitable activities. The result
of the computation is called the "minimum investment return." Foundations are then allowed
additional adjustments to the minimum investment
return, including deductions for the excise tax
on net investment income and taxes on any "unrelated business income."
The adjusted minimum
investment return, called the "distributable
I
I
Private Foundations, 1982
amount," is the actual amount foundations must
distribute for charitable purposes during their
annual accounting period.
A foundation is
subject to a two-tier system of penalty taxes
for any portion of the distributable amount
which it fails to pay out for charitable causes
by the end of its next accounting period.
I
Amounts which qualify toward meeting the
minimum required distribution include foundation
expenditures
for
accomplishing
its
charitable
purpose;
program-related
investments; amounts paid to acquire assets directly
used, or held for use, in carrying out its
charitable function; and any amounts set aside
for future payment for a specific charitable
project.
These amounts are called "qualifying
distributions."
Foundations may also utilize
carryovers (amounts paid out in excess of the
amount required) from 5 previous years' grantmaking to meet the minimum payout requirement.
As
discussed
earlier,
the
distributable
amount prior to 1981 was defined as the greater
of
"adjusted
net income"
(current income
derived from the ownership of property or from
income-producing activities, whether charitable
or not, less allowable expenses) or the minimum
investment return.
With the enactment of the
Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981, Congress
changed the definition to limit the computation
of the distributable amount to the minimum investment return without regard to the adjusted
net income. The change was intended to provide
relief to foundations during a period of high
inflation (1981 saw the height of inflation
rates) [241.
High inflation rates tended to
decrease the real value of a foundation's net
income.
If the distributable amount was based
9
on the entire amount of a foundation's adjusted
net income (the real portion plus the inflationproduced portion), the gradual effect would be
an erosion of the real value of its investment
assets [251.
The data presented in Figure F show the
effect of the 1981 tax law change on the amount
foundations
were
required
to
expend
for
charitable purposes for
1982.
Under the
pre-1982 rules, foundations would have been
required to pay out $4 billion, $1.6 billion
more than was requi red for 1982.
Private
nonoperating foundations for 1982 made qualifying distributions of $4.9 billion, over twice
the amount required to be distributed.
The
effect of the revised distribution calculation
is further demonstrated by a comparison of the
distributable -amount for 1979 to that for 1982,
in constant 1979 dollars,
which shows
a
23-percent real decline between the two years.
Although nonoperating foundations collectively
made qualifying distributions for 1982 that
exceeded
the distributable amount required
under both the existing and previous laws,
organizations with $10 million or more in
assets as a group distributed $126.8 million
less than the amount that would have been
required if adjusted net income had still been
a factor in determining the distributable
amount.
This would be expected since the law
change, limiting the required payout to 5 percent of investment assets, was intended to help
most those foundations which relied more heavily
on investments as a principal source of income.
Based on the higher rate by which their
adjusted net income exceeded their minimum
investment return, it appears on the surface
Figure F.--Nonoperating Foundations:
Comparison of Adjusted Net
Investment Return (MIR), by Size of Total Fair Market Value of Assets
Income
(ANI)
with
Minimum
Dioney amounts are in millions of dollars]
Item
Total
Si ze of Total Fai r Market Value
.O1UU,UUU
$1,000,woUnder
under
under
$100,000
M
$1,000,000
TYT-
$10,000,000
(4)
_'
M
.......
25,363
Number of returns with
ANI greater than MIR .........
17,970
7,007
7,314
2,995
654
Greater of ANI or MIR ..........
MIR ............................
4,097.1
.2,458.3
41.1
21.4
256.8
138.2
827.5
466.5
2,971.7
1,832.3
Difference .....................
1,638.8
19.7
118.6
361.0
1,139.5
Difference as percent of MIR ...
66.7
92.1
85.8
77.4
62.2
Number of returns, total
NM :
DetaTiT may not add t6--tota
8,577
$10,000,000
or more
ecause of rounding.
750
Private Foundations, 1982
10
that the smaller foundations benefited the most
f rom
the
new
provi si on.
However,
small
organizations historically have made charitable
distributions that well exceeded their annual
required minimum.
Unlike small foundations,
most of the money distributed by large foundations for charitable purposes comes from their
i nvestment i ncome.
Since the distributable
amount is dependent on the size of investment
assets, the reduction in the distributable
amount is more significant to large organizations. This concept is discussed more fully in
the analysis of. Figure G data which follows
below.
of all
Eighty-f i ve
percent
nonoperati ng
foundations made qualifying distributions above
the required 5 percent of net investment assets
(after allowed adjustments), and more than half
of these foundations paid out amounts which
While the
were equal to 10 percent or more.
remaining 15 percent made qualifying distributions which were less than the required
percentage,
they may have exercised their
option to combine all or a portion of their
5-year excess distributions carryover with
their current-year qualifying distributions to
fulfill the required distributable amount for
1982.
As noted earlier, no penalty or tax
would have been imposed on a foundation which
did not pay out the required amount for 1982
unless it failed to do so by the end of its
1983 tax year. A small number of those paying
out-less than 5 percent were allowed to do so
because their IRS return was filed for an
accounting period of less than one year.
Figure G graphically measures, through the
use of ratios to total investment assets, how
various asset size classes stack up in a com-
Figure G
Nonoperating Foundations: Required Distributions, Qualifying Distributions, Undistributed
Income, and Excess Distributions Made for 1982, By Size of Total Fair Market Value of Assets
100
= Required Distributions (Distributable Amount)
95
Actual (Qualifying) Distributions
= Undistributed Income
90
Excess Distributions Made for 1982
85
80
Percent
of
75
Investment
Assets
20
16.5%
15
12.9%
10
7.6%
$100,000
under
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
under
$10,000.000
Fair Market Value of Assets
$10,000,000
or more
Private Foundations, 1982
pari son
of
charitable
distribution
items.
While the smallest foundations made philanthropic di sbursements which were extremely
large in proportion to their investment assets,
the aggregate distributions of the other asset
classes still exceeded the required amount.
It is important to differentiate between
small (assets under $100,000) and large (assets
of $10 million or more) foundations by each
group's principal source of income and how it
affects their qualifying distributions.
When
income sources are considered, the dramatic
decreases in qualifying distribution percentages that accompany increases in asset size are
more understandable.
Since the distributable amount is based on a
percentage of
investment
assets,
and
the
principal source of income for large foundations is their return on investments, it is not
surprising that the amount of their qualifying
is
the
distributions
relatively close to
required distributable amount. Small organizations generally make qualifying distributions
which are much higher than those requi red
because the contributions they receive, which
comprise most of their income, are not taken
into account in computing the distributable
amount. In fact, as a percent of their assets,
contributions received by small organizations
for 1982 equalled 53.4 percent compared to 2.9
percent when calculated for large foundations.
Traditionally,
small
foundations not only
serve as a conduit for all of the contributions
they receive, but they pay out substantially
more of their income as well.
To illustrate
further the effect that the omission of contributions from the distributable amount had on
the required and actual payouts of the two
asset groups, contributions received for 1982
as a percentage of their respective distributable amounts were 806 percent for small
foundations compared to 68 percent for large
foundations.
The 1982 undistributed income (the portion of
the
required
distribution
which
was
not
actually paid out as a qualifying distribution
for 1982) of all asset groups appears to be a
fairly stable proportion of their investment
assets, ranging from 1.1 to 1.5 percent.
As would be expected because of their direct
relationship
to
qualifying
distributions,
excess distributions for 1982 (amounts paid out
which were in excess of the amount required)
were much
higher,
rel ati ve
to
investment
assets, for small foundations than for large
foundations.
After
applying
their
1982
qualifying distributions toward any prior-year
undistributed
income
and the
current-year
distributable amount, foundations made excess
distributions for 1982 of $1.6 billion.
11
Legislative Analysis
Following is a brief analysis of major tax
law changes affecting private foundations from
1969 to 1 984. For a more in-depth account of
private foundation legislation, see the Appendix at the end of this article.
The Tax Reform Act of 1969 was the f i rst
comprehensive piece of legislation affecting
private foundations.
Recommendations for increased Governmental regulation of foundations
from a Treasury Department study (described in
the Appendix to this article) and heightened
public concern over reported controversial
foundation activities culminated in hearings of
the House Ways and Means Committee in early
1969.
The Committee's findings led to the
passage of the 1969 Act. The provisions of the
1969 Act covering foundations were enacted to
correct and prevent any real and potential
abuses of their charitable status.
Enactment of the Economic Recovery Tax Act of
1981 afforded individuals who could not itemize
their deductions the tax benefit of deducting
charitable contributions.
Congress believed
this would stimulate charitable giving and
provide
funds
to
nonprofit
organizations
providing services which the Federal Government
might otherwise need to fund.
This provision
terminates after 1986, so that its effectivebe
ness
in
stimulating contributions can
analyzed. The 1981 Act also changed the method
of computing the minimum payout requirement in
an effort to provide relief to foundations from
the effects of high inflation.
Many of the foundation provisions of the Tax
Reform Act of 1984 provide tax incentives and
remove regulatory restraints in an effort to
encourage the formation of new foundations.
Provisions of the tax bill which are expected
to promote philanthropic giving are increased
deductibility allowances for individuals' gifts
to charities, the 1-percent reduction in the
2-percent excise tax if a 5-year average of the
foundation's qualifying distributions increases
by a like amount, and a change in the minimum
payout rule that limits the amount of administrative expenses incurred in the making of
grants that may be treated as qualifying distributions.
The Treasury Department has been
directed to study the effects of the new payout
requirement, which expires on December 31,
1990, unless Congress acts to continue it.
SUMMARY
For
1982,
approximately
28,500
private
foundations
spent
over
$5.2
billion
for
philanthropic purposes.
Of this expenditure,
$4.4 billion was in the form of grants made to
tax-exempt
organizations
di rectly
operating
charitable programs.
12
Private Foundations, 1982
In 1979 dollars, total fair market value of
assets for 1982 increased by 11 percent over
1979.
Despite erratic shifts in the economy
between 1979 and 1982, foundation interest and
dividend income, the primary aggregate income
source, rose by 56 percent over 1979.
A 1981 tax law change, intended to provide
rel i ef to foundations from high inflation,
effectiv6ly lowered the amount foundations were
The new law
required to distribute for 1982.
seemed to have a positive effect on many
foundations and had no apparent negative impact
on the amount of qualifying distributions made
for-philanthropic purposes.
DATA SOURCES AND LIMITATIONS
The statistics in this article are based on a
sample of 1982 Income Year private foundation
returns, Forms 990-PF, filed with the Internal
Revenue Service and having accounting periods
ending December 1982 through- November 1983.
Forms 990-PF filed by nonexempt charitable
trusts and certain taxable foundations were
The sample was
excluded from the study.
stratified based on size of total book (ledger)
value of assets and selected at rates that
ranged from 0.7-percent to- 100 percent. There
were 1,309 returns in the sample drawn from an
estimated population of 28,468.
The 1982 sample was designed to provide the
most reliable estimates -of total assets and
total income using limited resources (budgetary
constraints necessitated a very small sample
The methodology employed to obtain the
size).
desired results was to include in the sample
all returns with assets (book value) of $10
million or more, the category where the highest
The
634
concentration of assets exists.
returns in this group accounted for approximately 70 percent of total assets and 50
The remaining 675
percent of the sample.
returns in the sample were randomly selected at
various rates, depending on their asset size.
Due to the small number of sample returns
selected to represent the population of returns
with assets worth under $100,000 (99 sample
returns), the statistics presented for this
group are subject to significant sampling
variability and should, therefore, be used with
caution.
The population from which the sample was
drawn consisted of the latest private foundation records on the IRS Business Master File.
Determinations of active filing status were
made regarding the sample records. Some of the
records drawn were deemed inactive (no return
had been filed for at least 3 years), terInactive
minated, or not yet filed for 1982.
and terminated private foundations were not
reflected in the estimates.
Prior-year -returns
were substituted for the small number of large
private foundations for which a 1982 return had
not yet been filed or was unobtainabl'e for inSample weights applied
clusion in the study.
to small organizations were revised upward to
compensate . for missing returns in the latter
category. Asset distributions i)resented in the
1982 tables have been comDressed dup to the
small - numbers of returns with assets less than
$10 million selected for the sample.
Because the data presented in this article
are estimated based on a sample, they are subject to sampling error, as well as nonsampling
error.
'To -.use - the stati stical data properly,
the magnitude of the sampling error should be
Coefficients of variation (CV's) are
known.
used to measure that magnitude.
The table below presents an estimate of the
sampling error, expressed as a coefficient of
variation, for frequency estimates of private
foundation returns with less than $10 million
Returns reporting assets of $10
in assets.
million or more were selected at a rate of 100
is
not
percent;
therefore,
this category
The approximate
subject- to sampling error.
CV's shown here are intended only as a general
indication of the reliability of the data.. For
a number other than those shown below, the
corresponding 'CV's- can be estimated by ihterpolation. ,
Estimated Number of Returns
by Size of Total Assets'
Under
$100,000
$100,000
$1,000,000
or Not
Under
Under
Reported $1,000,000 $10,000,000
Approximated
Coefficient
of Variation
9,683
4,126
1,810
1,010
463
.05
.07
.10
.15
.20
.30
14,584
6,482
3,683
1,620
3,567
1,897
928
412
237
103
'Total assets used were the book value reported.
The uppermost number in each column is
the actual total number of returns in the asset
class.
A discussion of the reliability of estimates
based on samples and the use of coefficients of
variation
for evaluating
the precision of
sample estimates can be found in the general
Appendix to this publication.
EXPLANATION OF TERMS
Non-tec hnical terminology has been used in
this article, wherever possible, to assist in
the understanding of the statistical content.
However, in Tables 1-6, the technical terms are
used as they appear on the tax return form.
Private Foundations, 1982
Therefore, to assist users of these data, explanations of some of these teryns are provided
wi th both thei r technical and nontechnical
meanings.
(The latter are denoted in parenA more comprehensive explanation of
theses.)
terms appears in Statistics of Income--19741978, Private Foundations (see reference L22J).
Adjusted Net Income (Receipts Less Expenses)
item
represented
the gross income
This
derived from, or in connection with, property
held by the foundation or from income-producing
activities reduced by allowable deductions. It
net short-term
included
investment income,
capital gain, repayment of "qualifying disfrom
business
tributions,"
gross
profit
activities, and certain miscellaneous income.
Excluded from income were gross contributions,
gifts, and grants (received); contributions
f rom split-interest trusts; gross dues and
assessments; net long-terTn capital gains; and
net short- and long-term capital losses.
Distributable Amount (Required Minimum
Distribution)
Distributable amount was the foundations'
minimum investment return" less taxes on net
investment
income
and
unrelated
business
The
income,
and
net of a ny
adjustments.
distributable amount represented the minimum
payout which had to be distributed by the end
of the year following the year for which the
return was filed in order to avoid payment of
an
excise
tax
for
failure
to
currently
distribute income.
payouts to other private foundations, if the
recipient foundation agreed to distribute the
same amount for charitable purposes by the end
of the following tax year.
In addition, funds
set aside for major tax-exempt projects were
also included.
Qualifying distributions were
creditable
against
a
private
foundation's
obligation
to
pay
out
its
"distributable
amount."
Value of Noncharitable Assets (Investment
Assets)
For
purposes
of
calculating
11minimum
investment return," only the assets that were
not used or held for use for exempt purposes
entered into the computation. An asset was not
used directly in carrying out the foundation's
exempt purpose if the asset was not used in the
carrying on of a charitable, educational or
other similar function which gave rise to the
exempt status of the foundation.
NOTES AND REFERENCES (to Article)
[11
Data cited for 1979 are from Petska,
Thomas B., "An Examination of Private
Foundations for 1979, " Statistics of
Income Bulletin, Fall 1982, Volume 2,
Number 2.
E 21
All inflation-adjusted figures cited in
this article have been derived using the
Gross National
Product Implicit Price
Deflator.
See
U.S.
Department
of
Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis,
Survey of Current Business, 1974, 1979,
anETM-2-7
[31
Since the returns selected for the 1982
study form a panel to be studied in
successive years, the question of an
actual decline in the foundation birth
rate
will
be
investigated
as
these
foundations are tracked from year to year.
[4]
Under
Internal
Revenue
Code
section
6104(b), the Internal Revenue Service can
disclose to the public the information
which is
required to be reported on
private foundation information returns.
L5J
The
contribution
data
presented
for
i ndi vi dual s,
corporations,
bequests,
trusts and estates were obtained from
income tax returns and are subject to
certain limitations inherent in the use
of administrative records.
The use of
these data is intended here as a general
measure for comparison with foundation
charitable giving, and may not necessarily represent contributions actually
paid or received in a given tax period.
Factors which can affect the amount of
contributions reported on certain tax
returns are a limitation on the amount
01
IExpenditures for Exempt Purposes (Philanthropic
or Charitable Spending)
These deductions represented expenditures for
activities that were directly related to the
tax-exempt
purposes
of
the
foundation.
Included
were
necessary
and
reasonable
administrative expenses paid for charitable,
scientific,
educational,
or
other
similar
purposes.
These amounts were determined solely
on the cash receipts and disbursements method
of accounting.
Minimum Investment
Ts`se_
tsT_
Return
(Fixed
Percent
13
of
This was the aggregate fair market value of
assets not used for charitable purposes less
the sum of indebtedness incurred to acquire
those assets and cash held for charitable
activities, multiplied by 5 percent.
Qualifying Distributions (Actual Distributions)
These were direct expenditures for charitable purposes or for assets used for such
purposes.
They included payouts to public
and
charities
and
operating
foundations,
I
14
Private Foundations, 1982
which can be deducted, allowance of a
disallowed contributions
carryover of
from previous years and, in the case of
fiduciary returns (trusts and estates)
an election to treat contributions mad~
in one taxable year as being paid in the
The charitable
preceding taxable year.
bequest data were obtained from a study
of estate tax returns filed with gross
Had the
estate of $300,000 or more.
bequests of persons- with estates less
than $300,000 been included, it is estimated -that -the amount shown would have
been approximately 10 percent higher.
[61
[71
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal
Revenue Service, Statistics of Income-1982, Individual Income Tax Returns, pp.
-54 and 61.
foundations
company-sponsored
Includes
which -filed a Form 990-PF, Return of
Private Foundation, for 1982.
[81
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal
Revenue Service, Statistics of Income-1982, Corporation Source Book, p. 8.
[91
U.S. Department -of the Treasury,- Internal
Revenue Service, Statistics of Income
Division, unpublished table of estate tax
returns filed during 1982.
Estep, Gary J., "Fiduciary Income Tax
Statistics of Income
Returns,
19829"
Bulletin, Spring 1985, Volume-4, Number
T,-p`p_._49 and 56.
[101
[151
[161
[171
U.S
Department of Commerce, Bureau of
Eco~omic Analysis, Handbook of Cyclical
Indicators, 1984, p. 99.
[18]
Ibid., p. 143.
1-19]
L
Individual data for 1979 derived from
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal
Revenue Service, Statistics of Income-Income Tax Returns1979,
Individual
Data for 1982 were derive~
Table 1.3.
from the same publication, 1982 edition,
Table 1.4.
The Commission on Foundations and Private
Philanthropy, Foundations, Private Giving,
sity
and Public Policy, The Chicago Univ~_rPress, 1970.
Federal Reserve Bulletin, March 1985,
Table 1.
for 1974 are from U.S.
Data cited
Internal
Department of the Treasury,
Revenue Service, Statistics of Income-1974-78, Private Foundations.
[201
21.1
[221
[11
[121
[131
[1 41
Data were derived from The Foundation
Center, National Data Book, 9th Edition,
9-706.
New York: 1985, pp.
For readers who are familiar with the
Return
terminology used on Form 990-PF
',
following
the
of
Private Foundation,
clarification of income statement terms
used in this article and- related tables
is provided. Total "receipts" is comparabl e to total "revenue" (Part I, line 13,
column A); total "deductions" is comparable to total "expenses" (Part I, line 24,
column A); and "net income (less deficit)"
is comparable to "excess of revenue over
expenses" (Part 1, line 25(a), column A).
U.S.
Department of Health and Human
Services, Social Security Administration,
Social Security Bulletin: Annual StatisSocial
tical Supplement, 1983, p. 00.
di rec t
expenditures
include
welfare
Government disbursements to the aged,
and poor,
plus
disabled,. unemployed,
expenditures
for
schools,
Government
hospitals, and other similar facilities.
[231
Hopkins, Bruce R., The Law of Tax-Exempt
Organizations, Third Edition, John Wiley
and Sons, Tnc., 1979, pp. 475-476.
[241
See Joseph, James A., Private Philanthropy and the Making of Public Policy,
D.C.:
The
ounc-iF- on
Washington,
(PresiFoundations, 1985, pp. 24-36.
dent's platform presented at the 36th
on
annual
Conference of the Council
Foundations held on April 24-26, 1985.)
[251
U.S. Congress, Joint Committee on Taxation, General Explanation of the Economic
Recovery Tax Act Of Ml (Public Law
97-34), U.S. GoverniFe-ntPrinting Office,
December 31, 1981, pp. 366-367.
For detailed discussions of the effect on
foundations of the pre-1981 requirement
to distribute their actual income if it
was higher than their minimum investment
return, see Steuerle, Eugene, "Pay-out
Requirements for. Foundations," in Research Papers Sponsored by The Commission
a n a7-Pu-5T1c
Philanathropy
on
Private
Needs, Volume III, Special Behaviorial
and Co~
orat~
ions,
Studies, FounUati ons
U.S. Department of the Treasury, pp. lbbJ78, and Williamson, J. Peter, "Inflation
and the Foundation Payout Rate," Foundation News, March-April 1981, Volume
Numbe
pp. 18-24.
Nason, John W., Trustees and the Future
of Foundations, New York, Council on
Foundations. T979, p. 3.
Sugarman, Norman A., "Community Foundations," Research Papers Sponsored by the
Commission on Private Philanthropy and
Public Needs, Volume 111, Special BeFoundations,
Na-v-1 or-aT-- 5 t Ud 1 e s ,
U.S.
Department of TFe
Co rporati ons,
Treasury, 1977, pp. 1692-1693.
Private Foundations, 1982
APPENDIX:
HIGHLIGHTS IN FOUNDATION LEGISLATIVE HISTORY
Since this study is the first in an annual
Statistics of Income (SOI) series designed to
track and report on private foundation trends
and changes in reporting patterns, it seems
appropriate to provide, as background information for future SOI reports on foundation data,
a historical review of major private foundation
legislation [11 [2].
Foundations, which (as we know them today) had
their beginnings around the late 1800's [31,
have had their share of proponents and opponents
alike
throughout
their
existence.
Some
question their qualification for tax-exempt
status because of their narrow base of support
and the advantageous tax treatment given to
their usually wealthy donors.
Others see
foundations as playing a key role in meeting
public needs by funding continuing non-profit
projects or by supporting innovative or risky
undertakings which could not be funded by more
conventional
sources.
Throughout foundation
history, Congress has recognized the need for
Government
regulation and public accountability, yet has maintained that foundation
philanthropic activities are deserving of tax
exemption.
The following historical account
summarizes major legislative events affecting
private foundations.
1917
Individuals allowed deductions
charitable contributions.
1934
Law passed prohibiting tax-exempt
-charitable organizations from lobbying.
Corporations allowed deductions for
charitable contributions.
1943
Passage of the Revenue Act of 1943.
Required certain tax-exempt organizations, including foundations, to
file annual information returns.
s 1947-48
Hearings held by the House Ways and
Means and the Senate Interstate and
Foreign
Commerce
Committees
on
foundation activities. No legislative outcome.
1952-62
taining their findings and recommendations but no legislative action
was taken.
- House Select Committee to Investigate and Study Educational and
Philanthropic
Foundations
and
other
Comparable
Organizations
Which are Exempt from Federal
Taxation, Chaired by Rep. Eugene
E. Cox. (Established in 1952.)
- House Special Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations and
Comparable Organizations, chaired
by Rep. Carroll B. Reece.
(Established in 1953.)
- House Select Committee on Small
Business, Chaired by Rep. Wright
Patman.
(Establ i shed in 1962;
last installment of eight reports
issued in 1972.)
e 1965
U.S. Treasury Department Report on
Private Foundations issued. Treasury concluded that while private
foundations play an important role
in our society and generally operate
free of abuse, serious problems did
exist among a small number of them.
The study resulted in extensive
recommendations for dealing with
six categories of major abuses. No
immediate legislation was passed.
1969
Passage of Tax Refonn Act of 1969.
The 1969 Act for the first time
defined private foundations in the
Internal Revenue Code,
subjected
foundations to an excise tax on
investment income (to cover the
cost of IRS oversight), and imposed
a two-tier system of penalty taxes
foundations
that engage
in
on
11prohibited
acts."
Provisions
taxes
on
dealing
with
penalty
prohibited
acts
included
the
following:
for
1935
e 1950
is
Passage of the Revendb Act of 1950.
Imposed regulations on foundations
regarding unrelated business income,
excessive accumulation of income,
prohibited activities, and public
disclosure of annual
information
returns.
Several
Congressional
committees
established to investigate alleged
abusive foundation activities. The
committees each issued reports con-
- taxes
on
self-dealing
(transactions between a foundation and
a disqualified
person.
E.g.,
lending money; sale, exchange or
leasing of property; transfer of
foundation income or assets to
disqualified persons).
- taxes on undistributed income (the
amount required to be distributed
in a given tax year for charitable purposes which the foundation fails to pay out by the end
of the following tax year).
16
Private Foundations, 1982
- taxes on excess business holdings
(amount by which stockholdings or
other interest in a
business
enterprise exceeds the amount of
permitted holdings).
1981
- taxes on investments which jeopa rdi ze the carrying out of a
foundation's exempt purpose (the
lack of ordinary care and prudence
in
making
investment
decisions).
- taxes on taxable expenditures
includes engaging- in nonexempt,
political, or legislative activities; and disbursements of
funds to other organizations or
i ndi vi dual s, without sufficient
oversight to ensure the funds are
used exclusively for exempt purposes).
1973-74. Hearings on a variety of private
issues
foundation
held
by
the
following Congressional committees,
but no legislation enacted.
- Subcommittee on -Domestic Finance
of the House Committee on Banking
and Currency (on compliance of
private
foundations
wi th. provisions of the Tax Reform Act of
1969).
- House Ways and Means Committee
(on
tax
treatment
of
private
foundations).
- Subcommittee
on Foundations of
the
Senate
Finance
Committee
(1973. hearings on the role of
foundations in society and the
impact of the provisions of the
Tax Reform Act of 1969; 1974
hearings to determine the influence of private foundations on
public
broadcasting;
additional
1974 hearings on the impact of
the economy on private foundations and their grant recipients).
1976
Legislation enacted to change the
required minimum payout to charity
from 6 percent to 5 percent of
market value investment assets for
accounting
periods
beginning in
1976.
Passage of the Economic Recovery
Tax Act of 1981.
Allowed individuals who could not itemize their
deductions to deduct part of their
charitable
contributions
anyway;
provided favorable tax treatment
for corporate charitable donations
of scientific equipment; and restricted the minimum payout computation base to investment assets,
without regard to the amount of the
foundation's income for the year.
1983
Hearings held by House Subcommittee
on Oversight of the Ways and Means
Committee on the impact of the Tax
Reform Act of 1969 on ' p ri vate
foundations.
1984
Passage of the Tax Reform Act of
1984. Its major private foundation
provisions include the following:
Limitation on the amount of grant
administrative expenses which can
be applied toward meeting the
minimum payout requirement.
The
Act also directed the Treasury
-Department to- conduct -a study of
foundation
administrative
ex.pens6s.
This
provision
terminates on December 31, 1990.
- Waiver 'of the 2-percent excise
tax for a
new classification
called "exempt operating foundations" and reduction in the tax
to 1 percent for nonoperating
foundations if a 5-year average
of their qualifying distributions
increases by a like amount.
- Extension
of
the
divestiture
period for excess business holdings under certain circumstances.
- Authority granted to IRS to abate
the first-tier penalty tax on
prohibited, foundation activities
(except self-dealing) when reasonable cause for the violation
can be proven. .
e 1978
Legislation enacted to change the
excise tax on net investment income
from 4 percent to 2 percent for
domestic foundations.-
- Definition of "family members" of
a substantial contributor modified
to treat as a "disqualified person"
only
those
descendents
through the great grandchildren
level.
Substantial
contributor
status is terminated if no connection with the foundation can
be demonstrated for a 10-year
period.
1980
Legislation enacted to simplify IRS
reporting
requirements placed on
private foundations.
- Directive issued to the Treasury
Department to review the expenditu re
re sp ons i bi 1 i ty
regulations
I
Private Foundations, 1982
(requiring oversight of certain
organizations to which grants are
made) to determine if they are
overly burdensome; to extend to 5
years the advance ruling period
during which a new organization
is treated as a public charity;
and to permit donor foundations
greater reliance an IRS rulings
for making grants to such new
organizations.
Increase in the deductible portion
of an individual's gift to a private foundation from 20 percent
to 30 percent of adjusted gross
income, except for donations of
appreciated property (which remain deductible up to 20 per-cent).
Appreciated publicly-traded stock
17
can now be deducted at fair market
value, subject to a limitation of
not more than 10 percent of all
the stock of a given company.
REFERENCES (to Appendix)
[I]
"Philanthropy Goes to Congress," Foundation News, May-June 1983, pp. 12-21.
[21
Feller, Nancy, "1984 Tax Reform Act,"
Non-Profit Organizations: Current Issues
and Developments, Practicing Law Institute, Course Ra-n-dbook Series Number 217,
December 1984.
[31
The Foundation Center,
Directory, 8th Edition,
p. xiv.
The Foundation
New-York, T98%
18
Private Foundation Information Returns, 1982
Table I.-Number of Foundations, Total Receipts and Total Deductions, Net Investment Income and Tax, Total Assets, Net
Worth, and Distributions, by Type of Foundation and Size of Total Fair Market Value of Assets
[money amounts are in thousands of dollars]
Total receipts
Numbe
Size of tot al
fair market value of assets
of
return
Number of
returns
Amount
Number of
rettims
"m
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
All foundations, total .................................
28,468
27,603 9,126,529
Zero. negative or unreported ............................
$11 under $100, 000 .........................................
$ DO ,000 under $1,000.000 .............................
$1 ,000.000
nder $10,000,000 .........................
$25000000 ........................
$10 ,000.OU
$25 .D00. 000 under $50:000:000 ........................
$50 .0D0. 000 under $100,000.DDO ......................
$100,000,001) or more ....................................
1.515
13,237
9,125
3,771
493
162
85
80
Nonoperating foundations, total .............
25,363
Zero. negative or unreported ...........................
$1 under $100 ,000 ...................... .................
$100,000 under $1 , 000 ,000 ..............................
$1 ,000 ,000 under $10,000 ,000 .........................
$10,000 ,000 under $25,000,000 ........................
$25,000 ,000 under $50,000,000 ........................
$50,000 ,000 under $100,000,000 ... ...................
$100,000,000 or more ....................................
1,515
11,175
8577
3:346
459
143
75
73
1,368
12,6D6
6,906
264,945
9,040
3.771
492
161
85
80
662,390
2.097,182
1.010,618
767,421
1,165,244
3,151,824
24,540 8,077,449
1,368
10,543
- 8,535
3,346
458
142
75
73
6,906
235,993
631,152
1,695.040
'915,955
677,744
1.055,625
2,859, 034
_
Numbw Of
raturns
27,645 5,834,328
1.515
12,500
9,D40
3.771
492
161
85
80
Ouafitying contributions,
gifts. and grants paid
Disbursements for
exempt purposes
Total deductions
1,515
10,438
8,535
3,346
458
142
75
73
6,721
425,797
490,555
1.228,612
693,288
423.874
487,175
1,504,744
(7)
(8)
26,410 5,156,993
6.721
458,142
524.324
1,515.561
746,510
473,535
527,937
1,581.598
24,582 5,260,767
Amount
Number of
retums
* 1.073
11.869
8.914
-6,280
444.940
483,780
3,741
490
159
84
80
1,431,404
664,048
406,261
474,789
1,245,491
23,599 4,670,649
-
Net income
(less; deficit)
Amount
Number
r'b'of
Amount
(9)
(10)
(11)
-
23,306 4,429,979
.111,
9,659
8,577
3.419
462
ISO
78
77
-5,621
406,020
455,477
1.142,658
585,549
339,597
413,269
1,081.789
22,044 4,364,340
-5,621
401,734
447.407
27,108 3,292,200
* 1.073
12,50()
8,956
3,761
491
161
85
80
-6,280
414,887
456,935
1,174.197
619,961
362,808
446,331
1,189,250
*884
8,923
81198
3,305
449
139
74
73
410,608
1,070,826
*1,073
10,585
8,451
3,336
457
142
75
73
2,811
486,344
1,262
-
-189,805
140,596
466,428
222,668
253.870
568,450
1,354,290
3,105
3,063 1,049,080
3,063
573,561
65,639
2,916
475,619
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$50, 000,000 under $100,000,000 ......................
$100,000,000 or more ....................................
2,062
547
425
34
119
0
7
2,062
505
425
34
9
1
10
7
28,952
31,238
402,141
94,662
89677
109:619
292,791
2,062
505
425
34
9
1
10
7
32,345
33.769
286,949
53,222
49,660
40,762
76.854
1.915
421
405
34
19
10
7
30,053
26.845
257,207
"'088
43,453
28,458
56,240
114
13
11
4
4
24,501
12,869
2,291
2,661
10,962
1.915
505
425
34
19
10
7
-3,393
-2,531
115,193
41,440
40,017
68,857
215,937
Grantmaking foundations, total ..............
23,306
Operating foundations, total ...................
Zero. negative or unreported ...........................
$1 under $100,000 ........................................
$lDO, 000 under $1,000,000 .............................
$1 , 000 ,000 under $10,000,000 .........................
$10, 000,000 under $25.000,000 ........................
$25. 000,000 under $50,000,000 ........................
Zero, negative or unreported ..............
; .......
$1 under $100 ,000 .........................................
$100,000 under $1 . 000,000 ..............................
$10
,
000,000
..........................
$1 ,000 ,000 under
$10,000 ,000 under $25,000,000
$25,000 .000 under $50,000,000 .............. * ... -* ...
.......................
***.......
$50,000 ,000 under $100,000,DOO...............
$100,000,000 or more .....................................
9,659
8,577
3,419
462
150
78
77
Grantmaking-nonoperating
foundations, total ........................ E: ............
22,044
23,159 8,441,654
.884
9,512
8,577
3,419
462
ISO
78
77
220.764
632,560
1,764,636
937,335
702,732
1,116.349
3,062,314
21-1897 7,982,283
.(M
$100,000,000 or more ...................................
8 ,923
198
0
':
33
5
"g
139
74
73
8,775
8198
3305
449
139
74
73
*5.064
216 .694
607,200
1,686,370
894,052
670,383
1,043.484
2,859,034
Nongrantmakin nonoperating
foundations, Io
-tal ..................................
3,318
2,643
95,167
."I"
- 1,1142
19,299
'23,951
-8,670
21,903
7,361
12,141
Zero, negative or unreported ..........................
$1 under $100,000 .......................................
$1 DO ,000 , under $1 ,000,000 ............................
$1 ,000, 000 under $10 ,000,000 ........................
$10 ,000, 000 under $25,000 ,000 .......................
$25 .000, 000 under $50,000 ,000 .......................
$50 ,000, 000 under V00,000,000 ................ ....
Zero, negative or unreported ...........................
$1 under $100.000 ........................................
$100.000 under $1,000,000 .............................
$1 ,000,000 under $10 ,000 ,000 .........................
$10,000,000 under $25,000,000 ........................
$25,000.000 under $50,000,000 ........................
$50,000.000 under $100,000,000 ......................
$100,000,000 or more .................................... .
Foomotes at end of table:
2,252
10
4
1,768
*337
*41
9
3
1
23,306 5,398,386
9,659
8,577
3,419
462
150
78
77
-5,901
. 413,997
511,847
1,269,654
698,857
443,303
499,798
1.555,030
22,044 5,197,952
*884
8 ,923
8,198
3,305
449
139
74
73
-5,901
409,157
485,278
1.220,806
672,619
416,495
482,954
1,504,744
2,538
62,815
1,515
*337
*41
9
3
1
16,641
-5, 277
-7.807
20,668
7,380
4,222
23,306 4,825,580
.1w
9,659
8,577
3,419
462
150
78
77
*5.900
409,736
479,618
1,215,777
631.492
385.641
461,036
1.236,380
22,044 -4,640,110
23,306 4,429,979
*884
9.659
8,577
3,419
462
150
78
77
-5,621
406,020
455,477
1,142,658
585.549
339,597
413,269
1,081,789
22,044 4,364,340 7
23,063 3,043,267
9,659
8,493
3,409
461
150
78
77
837
-193,233
120.712
494,882
238,478
259,429
616,551
1.507,284
21,802 2,784,329
8,923
8,198
3,305
449
139
74
73
-5,900
405,415
454,917
1,168,107
608,343
361,847
"(5,331
1,189,250
8,923
8,198
3,305
449
139
74
73
401,734
447,407
1,118,157
572,680
337.306
410,608
1,070,826
8,923
8,114
3,294
448
139
74
73
837
-192,463
121,922
465,565
221,433
253,889
560.531
1,354,290
1,554
30,540
-
-
2,390
32,352
1 ,663
*337
-1,022
2, 658
18,674
9
3
1
1,234
-19
7 ,919
- 1,031
*295
*31
7
1
-
-9 ,472
-2,018
-6,090
11,618
961
-
I
24,192 2,816,681
-1,073
9,954
8,493
3.336
456
140
74
73
1,118,157
572,680
337,306
-193,198
138,065
581,621
264.108
293,886
637,306
1.570,226
i
Private Foundation Information Returns, 1982
Table I.-Number of Foundations, Total Receipts and Total Deductions, Net Investment Income and Tax, Total Assets, Net
Worth, and Distributions, by Type of Foundation and Size of Total Fair Market Value of Assets - Continued
19
(Money amounts are in thousands of dollars)
Net,mvestmemt
noome
Net income
Size of total
fair market value of assets
N u mb er of
returns
Amount
(t 3)
16,044 4,Y7-4 ,832
(12)
All foundations, total .................................
Zero, negative or unreported ............................
$1 under $100,000 ........................................
$10o,000 under $1,000,000 .............................
$1.000,ODO under $10,000.000 .........................
$10,000,000 under $25,0D0.000 ........................
$25.000.000 under $50,000,000 ........................
$50,000,000 under $100,000,000 ......................
$100,DOO,000 or more ....................................
Nonoperating foundations, total ............
Zero, negative or unreported ...........................
$1 under $100.000 ........................................
$100,000 under $1,000,000 .............................
$1.000.000 under $10.000,000 .........................
$10.000,000 under $25,000,000 ........................
$25,000,000 under $50,000,000 ........................
$50,000,000 under $100,000.000 ......................
$100,000,000 or more ....................................
Operating foundations, total ...................
Zero, negative or unreported ...........................
$1 under $100,000 ........................................
$100,000 under $1,000,000 .............................
$1,000,000 under $10,000,1300 .........................
$10,000,000 under $25,000,000 ........................
$25,000,000 under $50,000.000 ........................
$50.000,ODO under $100,000,000 ......................
$100,000,000 or more ....................................
Grantmaking foundations, total ..............
Zero, negative or unreported ...........................
$1 under $100,000 ........................................
$100,000 under $1,000,000 .............................
$1,000.000 under $10,000.000 .........................
$10,000,000 under $25,000.000 ........................
$25,000.000 under $50,000,000 ........................
$50,000.000 under $100,000,000 ......................
$100,000.000 or more ....................................
Grantmaking-nonoperating
foundations, total ..................................
Zero, negative or unreported ...........................
$1 under $100,000 ........................................
$100.000 under $1,000,000 .............................
$1,000,000 under $10.000,000 .........................
$10,000,000 under S25,000,000 ........................
$25,000,000 under $50,000,000 ........................
$50,000,000 under $100,000,000 ......................
$100,000,000 or more ....................................
Nongrantmaking-nonoperating
foundations, total ..................................
Zero, negative or unreported ...........................
$1 under $100,000 ........................................
$100,000 under $1,000,000 .............................
$1,000,000 under $10,000,000 .........................
$10,000,000 under $25,000,000 ........................
$25,DOO,000 under $50,000,000 ........................
$50.000,000 under $100,000,000 ......................
$100.000,DDO or more ....................................
Footnotes at end of table.
6,376
6,041
2,547
341
123
71
61
-1,048
41.734
246,205
775,798
373.r.46
366.377
674,890
1,795,134
14,714 3,773,644
.411
5,640
5.788
2,266
308
109
62
56
-1,048
37,928
242,921
655,270
331,917
322,544
605,529
1,576,487
1,330
-
Number of
returns
Amount
(14)
(15)
25,442
5,590,700
9,954
8,788
3,699
488
160
84
80
44,233
308.285
1,095,371
657,514
544,544
578,577
2.361,743
21,496 5,090,322
39,394
296,574
1,002,737
619,800
479,874
526,118
2,125,392
1,947 500,378
-1,031
-4,839
463
11,711
384
92,634
33
37.714
19
64.670
9
52,459
7
236,352
21,052 5,357,394
12,727 3,733,303
* 147
4.314
34,258
5.494
224,003
2,246
653,352
302
326,017
107
321,550
61
597,610
56
1,576,487
19,949 5,064,645
7,744
8,030
3,294
448
138
74
73
37,418
286,004
999,689
613,287
477,718
525,118
2.125,392
1,987
1,547
25,677
*41 5
-1,975
'10,570
*3,048
6.513
2,156
1,000
.1
'3
.295
'21
6
2
1
-
*18.919
-1.918
5.900
993
7,919
-
8,334
8.409
3.399
460
149
78
77
.1 1 178
.295
*21
7
3
1
41,071
295,330
1,019.060
632,769
502,684
555,274
2,311,186
Excise tax on net investment income
Num ber o f
returns
Amount
(16)
(17)
Domestic onganizations
Total
amount
5,513 11,79_4,i_67~
Foreign organizations
Number of
returns
Amount
Number of
returns
Amount
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
:F1 1,440
23,385
110,651
54
789
.9
-
40
89
112
502
-
.9
-1,885
65.742
244,538
171,373
141.992
202.586
926,549
881
6,187
21,907
13,187
10,876
11,628
46,767
9,954
8,746
3.699
482
155
82
78
881
6,141
21,907
13,147
10,787
11,515
46,265
'42
5
4
2
1
4,827 1,561,047
102,138
*737
2,210
2,02
32,,1
102
58
62
21,440
101,349
54
789
-
.9
.9
63,278
217,863
163,075
112,371
175,756
828,606
8,923
8.283
3,315
450
136
73
72
786
5,907
20,054
12,376
9,494
10,466
42,257
'42
5
-
2,084
1,803
302
91
50
56
786
5,953
20,054
12,416
9,583
10,578
42,759
685
*295
193,618
-
9,302
'94
234
1,853
771
1,293
1,049
4.008
107,459
T)
816
5.928
20.381
12,682
10,034
11,142
46.475
1,945
1,031
463
384
32
19
9
6
21,001
*147
8.334
8,367
3,399
456
146
77
76
9,302
234
1.853
771
1,293
1.049
4.008
106,739
T)
818
5.882
20,381
12,661
9,955
11,069
45,973
101,590
T)
747
5,741
19,993
12,276
9,535
10,539
42,759
19,899
*147
7,744
7,988
3,294
445
135
73
72
548
.8
*39
1,542
140
48
40
5
1
-
8.923
8,325
3,315
455
141
75
73
501,188
-3,805
*3.284
280
120,528
32
41,729
14
43,834
9
69,361
218,647
5
13,309 4,007,419
'26
4.609
35,374
5,704
227,202
684,919
2,298
314
343,168
113
330,907
65
653,631
58
1,732,192
40,341
-1,022
Net capital gain
-2,464
218
26,675
21
8,298
11
29,621
8
26,830
6
97,943
6,084 1,665,730
*737
-1,885
1,999
63,992
1,834
226,095
302
163,033
98
118,628
54
194,096
60
898.000
4,654 1,557,408
1,915
1,803
297
91
50
56
61,541
217,863
161.173
112.371
175,756
828,606
* 173
*166
5
-
* 3,639
-1,737
1,902
-
2
1
40
89
112
502
-
-
*49
-
*720
-
3
2
1
1
21
79
72
502
100,870
T)
747
5,696
19,993
12.255
9.455
10,466
42,257
*49
-
*720
-
479
.8
.5
121
38
-
2
3
2
1
1
-
21
79
72
502
*69
-
-1,178
19
10
40
20
Private Foundation Information Returns, 1982
Table 1.-Number of Foundations, Total Receipts and Total Deductions, Net Investment Income and Tax, Total Assets, Net
Worth, and Distributions, by Type of Foundation and Size of Total Fair Market Value of Assets- Continued
[Money amounts are in thousands of dollars]
!nvewo-ts
rn sewities
(book vabie)
Total assets
(book value)
Size of total
fair market vak* of assets
All foundations, total ..............................
Zero. negative or unreported .........................
$1 under $100,000 .....................................
$100.000 under $1,000,000 ..........................
$1,0D0.000 under $10,000,000 ......................
$10,000,DDO under $25,DDO.000 ....................
$25.000,DDO under $50,0D0,000 ....................
$50.ODO,000 under $1D0,000,000 .... ..............
$100,000,000 or more .................................
I-estmerrts
in som'sties
air market valm)
Total ~ts
(fair market valtie)
Not worth
Number
rebm~of
Amount
Numbw
f
retumso
Amount
N.mber Of
rettnns
Amotint
Number
f
retumso
Amotmt
Number of
rettam
Ammmt
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
27,584 48,227,043
13.237
9.125
3.771
493
162
85
80
. 408901
2 981:00
10.096.084
5,967,814
4,751,234
4,639,926
19.375,972
16,815 37,418,07i
'42
5.535
7.104
3,348
470
154
83
80
-3,814
155.798
1,770.325
6,579.417
4,466,902
3.534.173
3.652.311
17,255,330
26,953 62,886,606
17,025 49,822,624
-
-
-
-
13,237
9.125
3.771
493
162
85
so
416.696
3,262.919
11.981.973
7.543,920
5.816.852
6,035,403
27,828,a43
5.935
6.967
3,347
461
155
at
80
176,924
1.975.788
8.080,023
5,571,440
4,445.653
4.657,527
24,915.268
2T5-84 45,633,124
13.237
9,125
3,771
493
162
85
80
184.547
2,920,886
9,658,355
5.749.762
4,527.953
4.258.569
18,326,964
Nonoperating foundations, total ..........
24,479 42,542,775
15,461 33,846,950
Zero, negative or unreported ........................
$1 under $100,000 .....................................
$100,0DO under $1,000,000 ..........................
$1,000,000 under $10,000,000 ......................
$10.000,000 under $25.000,000 ....................
$25,000.000 under $50,000,000 ....................
$50.000.000 under $100,000,000 ...................
$100,000.000 or more .................................
-
-
-
4,945
6.725
3,026
441
136
74
73
-3,814
133,425
1,711,118
5,980,040
. 4,246,382
3,157,498
3,311,863
.15,302,810
-
11,175
8,577
3,34
45
143
75
73
-6,107
336,980
2,806,744
8,821,517
5,517,225
4,215,273
4,101,952
16,736,978
11,175
8,577
3,346
459
143
75
73
344,575
3,071,767
10,527,069
7,018,752
5.138.036
5,337,882
24,779.239
5,345
6.588
3,025
430
137
72
73
153,985
1,911,122
7,361,064
5,313,359
3,961,093
4,228,604
22.938,726
11,175
8,577
3.346
459
143
75
73
129.092
2,755,104
8,672,335
5,306,778
4,018,709
3,796.866
15.809.002
Operating foundations, total ................
3o'105
5,684,268
1,354
3,571,121
3,105
6,669,286
1,355
3,954,671
3,105
5,139,150
Zero, negative or unreported ........................
$1 under $100,000 .....................................
$100,000 under $1,000,0D0 ..........................
$1,000.000 under $10,000,000 ......................
$10,000,000 under S25,000,000 ....................
$25,000,000 under $50,000,000 ....................
$50,000,000 under $100,000.000 ...................
$100,000,000 or more .............................
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.06
54
42
3
19
10
7
71.922
174,262
1,274.567
450,589
535,961
.
537.974
2,638,993
322
29
18
9
7
'22,373
'59,207
599.377
220,520
376,675
340,448
1,952.521
2.062
547
425
34
19
10
7
72.120
191,152
1,454,904
525,168
678,816
697,521
3,049,604
322
30
18
9
7
22.940
64,667
718,959
258,081
484,560
428,923
1,976,542
2,062
547
42
34
19
10
7
55,455
165,782
986,020
442,983
509,245
461,703
2,517,963
Grantmaking foundations, total ...........
Zero, negative or unreported .........................
$1 under $100,0DO ................................
$100,000 under $1,000,ODO ...........................
-$1.000,000 under $10,DOO,000 .......................
$10,000,000 under $25,ODO,000 .....................
$25,000,000 under $50,000.000 .....................
$50,000,000 under $100,000,000 ....................
$100,000,000 or more ..................................
Grantmakingznon'operating
foundations, total ................................
22,864 45,462,726
9.659
8,5 7
3,419
462
150
78
77
343,928
2,818,775
9,054,558
5,546,119
4,411,650
4,290,338
18,996,782
21,602 41,946,501
15,679 36,114,133
23,847 56,217,321
22,422 59,429,355
15,670 45,867,953
15,825 48,248,839
-
-
-
-
-
-
5.051
6.809
3,078
443
145
77
77
140.369
1,687,649
6,062,852
4,274,580
3,368,556
3,507,336
17,072,790
9,659
8,577
3,419
462
150
78
77
355,844
3,073,946
10,754,371
7,058,159
5,385,686
5,578,857
27,222,492
5,345
6,672
3,077
433
145
75
77
164,575
1.884,883
7,449,804
5,337,881
4,208,735
4.468,426
24.734,534
14,704 33,642,880
21,160 55,535,910
14,848 45,618,008
24,479 40,1493,974
22,864 43,283,312
9,659
8,577
3,419
462
150
78
77
135.903
2.768,229
8.779.479
5.410,414
4,230,565
3,979,898
17,978,268
21,602 40,024,466
Zero, negative or unreported ........................
$1 under $100,000 .....................................
$100,000 under $1,000,000 ..........................
$1,000,000 under $10,000,000 ......................
$10.000,000 under $25.000,000 ....................
$25,000,000 under $50.000,000 ....................
$50,000,000 under $100,000,000 ...................
$100,000,000 or more .................................
8,923
8,198
3,305
449
139
74
73
305,527
2,688,326
8,728,573
5,355,018
4,102,936
4,028,566
16,736,978
4,461
6,514
3,015
433
134
73
73
117,997
1.646,541
5.976,347
4,175,348
3,131,213
3.292,625
15,302,810
8,923
8,198
3,305
"9
139
74
73
316.876
2,933,759
10,407,120
6,844,371
4,990,047
5,264,496
24,779.239
4,756
6,378
3,014
422
134
71
73
141,636
1.842.527
7,357,444
5,229,121
3,899,189
4.209,366
22,938.726
8,923
8,198
3,305
449
139
74
73
97,663
2,645.982
8,587,101
5,223,688
3~936,992
3,723,481
15,809,002
Nongrantmaking-nonoperating
foundations, total ................................
2,876
596,274
758
204,070
2,687
681,411
822
249,945
2,876
469,508
Zero. negative or unreported .......................
$1 under $100,000 .....................................
$100,GOO under $1,000,000 ..........................
$1.000,000 under $10,000,000 ..................
$10,000,000 under $25,000,000 ....................
$26,000,000 under $50,000,000 ....................
$50,000,000 under $100,000,000 ...................
$JDO,000,000 or more .................................
189
2,252
*379
*41
10
4
1
-
-5,530
31,453
-118,418
*92,944
162.207
112,338
73,386
-
-
-
-
-
27,699
: 1138 DOB
19:949
174.381
147,989
73,386
-
-589
:12 349
68:595
8
3
1
-
84,238
61.904
19,238
-
252
379
*41
10
4
1
-
31,429
109,123
*85,234
83,090
81,717
73,386
-
Footnotes at and of table.
*484
*211
'15,428
-64,577
8
2
1
-
71,034
26,285
19,238
-
1
514
79
141
Private Foundation Information Returns, 1982
Table I.-Number of Foundations, Total Receipts and Total Deductions, Net Investment Income and Tax, Total Assets, Net
Worth, and Distributions, by Type of Foundation and Size of Total Fair Market Value of Assets- Continued
21
[money amounts are in thousands of dollars)
Size of total
fair market value of assets
All foundations, total ............................. .
Zero, negative or unreported ......................... .
$1 under $100,000 ...................................... .
$100.000 under $1.000.000 ............................
$1,000,000 under $10,000,000 ........................
$10.000,000 under $25,000.000 .....................
$25,000,000 under $50,000,000 .....................
$50,000,000 under $100,000,000 ....................
$100,000,000 or more ..................................
Nonoperating foundations, total ..........
Zero, negative or unreported .........................
$1 under $100,000 ......................................
$100,000 under $1,000,000 ...........................
$1,000,000 under $10,000,000 .......................
$10,000,000 under $25,000,000 .....................
$25,000.000 under $50,000,000 .....................
$50,000,000 under $100,000,000 ....................
$100.000,000 or more ..................................
Operating foundations, total ................
Zero, negative or unreported .........................
$1 under $100,000 ......................................
$100,000 under $1,000,000 ...........................
$1,000,000 under $10,000,000 .......................
$10.000,000 under $25.000,000 .....................
$25,000,000 under $50,000,000 .....................
$50,000,000 under $100,000,000 ....................
$100,000,000 or more ..................................
Grantmaking foundations, total ...........
Zero, negative or unreported .........................
$1 under $100,000 ......... ............................
$100,000 under $1,000,000 ...........................
$1,000,000 under $10,000,000 .......................
$10.000,000 under $25,000,000 .....................
$25.000,000 under $50,000,000 .....................
$50,000,000 under $100,000,000....................
$100,000,000 or more ..................................
Grantmaking-nonoperating
foundations, total ................................
Zero, negative or unreported .........................
$1 under $100,000 ......................................
$100,000 under $1,000,000 ...........................
$1,000,000 under $10,000,000 .......................
$10,000,000 under $25,000,000 .....................
$25,000,000 under $50,000,000 .....................
$50,000,000 under $100,000,000 ....................
$100,000,000 or more ..................................
Nongrantmaking-nonoperating
fo u nd a tions, to tal ................................
Zero, negative or unreported .........................
$1 under $100,000 ......................................
$100,000 under $1,000,000 ...................... ....
$1.000,000 under $10,000,000 .................. ....
$10,000,000 under $25,000,000 ................ ....
$25,000,000 under $50,000,000 ................ ....
$50,000,000 under $100,000,000 ............... ....
$100,000,000 or more ............................. ....
Minimum investment
return
Number of
Amount
returns
(33)
(34)
24,788 2,658,490
Distributable
amount
Number f
Amount
eturnso
(35)
(36)
23,278
2,397,587
787
10,291
24,092
8.451
134791
3.315
460:36
453
291,771
138
212,690
74
222,042
73
1,051,046
23,278 2,397,587
Number of
returns
(37)
26,429
* 1,073
11,869
8, 914
3,761
489
159
84
80
Amount
Undis buted
inommo'f~cr 1982
Number
Amoun t
raturnsof
(39)
j46)_
6,52~ -663,503
2.652
4,724
2.189
29,35C
1,354
135.379
19
86,153
5
59,800
3
71.428
4
276,668
6,52
663,503
2,65
4,724
2,189
29,35C
1 , 354
135 ,379
19C
86 ,153
59
59, 800
35
71,428
40
276,668
N/A
N/A
N/A
NIA
N/A
N/A
NIA
N/A
NIA
N/A
NIA
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5,754
658,464
2,062
4,303
2,021
25,964
1,344
135, 246
194
85,611
58
59,244
35
71,428
40
276.668
200,206
-2,164
5,438
35,589
13,144
22,707
19,695
101.450
2,575,722
10,291
8,451
3,315
453
138
74
73
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
NIA
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
21934
24,092
134, 791
460,368
291,771
212,690
222,042
1,051,046
N/A
NIA
NIA
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2,382,725
23,555
-1,073
9,954
8 ,451
3,336
455
140
74
73
2,874
1,915
463
425
34
19
10
7
23,263
(38)
5,529,765
-6.495
"9,158
48290
97 '78
6
1,4
6
429,72
508,213
1.474,322
4,872,48
; 6,495
4 5,276
455, 6 90
1 , 204, 782
633,950
364,203
457,964
1.334,123
657,282
33,882
27,217
277,096
63.115
65.524
50,248
140,199
5,113,738
9,217
8 ,451
3.368
455
148
78
77
21,033
137 .215
469,337
301,811
231,308
237.124
1,177,856
8,775
8, 114
3,284
448
137
74
73
22,936
129,224
457,056
289,660
210.723
222,042
1,051,046
9.65G
8, 535
3,419
461
ISO
78
77
410,125
477 ,368
1,251,174
648,450
389,429
476,720
1.454,571
21,359
'442
8,775
8,114
3,294
448
138
74
73
2,443,838
21,347
2,382o725
22,001
4,830,312
5,754
19,403
133,278
463,091
296,837
217,859
225,881
1,087,450
8,775
8,114
3,284
448
137
74
73
22,936
129,224
457,056
289.660
210,723
222,042
1.051,046
8.923
8,156
3,305
448
139
74
73
405,803
452,518
1,198,603
612,609
362,792
457,964
1,334,123
2,062
2.021
1,344
194
58
35
40
1,636
14,446
1,931
'42
1,515
14,862
1,554
42,171
1,155
-5,567
-3,312
2,111
1,967
-
-1,031
-9,472
7
1
-
21.341
1 , 412
11,027
8,872
3.606
479
156
83
80
22,995
22,770
143 .612
502,053
312,213
242,572
245,575
1,188.900
2,458,286
9,996
8 ,451
3,325
453
139
74
73
1,793
-1,031
421
281
26
17
9
7
22,235
20,586
138 , 174
466,465
299.069
219,865
225,881
1,087,450
-1,221
5
1
-
-4,895
-3,373
2,232
2,006
-
N/A - Not applicable.
7stimal:nshould be used 01h caution because of the small number of sample returns on
Len th
$500.
NOTE: Detail may not add to total because of rounding.
5
1
-
hich it is based.
Excess distributions
carrymerto 1983
Number
Amount retumsof
(41)
(42)
15,585 4,857,481
-6, 399
6,713
1,463,538
6,009
852,021
1 ,857
1 .273, 912
223
494, 538
8C
211 ,911
40
245,530
31
309,632
15,585 4,857,481
6,713
6,009
1 , 857
223
80
40
31
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
14,918
6,229
5,883
1 .846
219
80
40
31
1,463,538
852,021
1 .273, 9 1 2
494, 538
211 , 911
245, 530
309,632
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4,800,748
-5, 340
1,458,272
845,841
1 , 269, 177
455,046
211 ,911
245,530
309,632
658,464
14,918
4,800,748
4,303
25,964
135,246
85,611
59,244
71,428
276,668
6 ,229
5 ,883
1 ,846
219
80
40
31
1 ,458 ,272
845 ,841
1 ,269, 177
455, 046
211 , 911
245, 530
309,632
771
-
5,039
-
667
168
.3,386
2
1
542
556
56,733
-1 ,059
-5,266
-6, 180
735
*49493
4
Private Foundation Information Returns, 1982
22
Table 2.-All Foundations: Balance Sheets and Income Statements, by Size of Total Book Value of Assets
[Money amounts are in thousands of dollars]
Itern
Total
(1)
Number of returns .............................................
Total assets (Book value) ..... ..........................
28,468
48,227,043
Cash, total ............................................................
Non-intemt bearing accounts ................................
Savings and temporary cash investments .................
Accounts receivable, net ..........................................
Pledges receivable, net ............................................
Grants receivable ....................................................
Receivables due from disqualified persons ..................
Other notes and loans receivable, not ........................
Inventories .............................................................
Prepaid expenses and deferred charges .....................
Investments, total ...................................................
Securities ...........................................................
Land, buildings, arid equipment (Less accumulated
depreciation) ....................................................
Mortgage loans ...................................................
Other investments ...............................................
Chadtable-purpose land, buildings, and equipment (Low
accumulated depreciation) .....................................
Other assets ..........................................................
4,643,217
490,462
4,152.755
247.814
Asse
Under
$IW.000
u=.d
$"00.000
under
$1.000.0DO
(2)
(3)
(4)
*884
-
Under
$10,000,000
(5)
9,683
3,567
3,324,798 11,153,659
_(6)
$25,000,000
S513.000.0w
u,.der
$50,000,ooo
under
$100.000.000
(7)
(B)
$100,000,000
or more
(9)
371
5,848,437
136
4,761,337
74
5,154,433
53
17,592,715
642.341
44,253
598.088
43.898
10,000
1,877
23,603
116,985
12,332
13.936
4,640,174
4,271,492
424,159
20,258
403.901
14,821
2
21
1
39.931
2.853
2,477
4,000,886
3,513,521
400,596
23.482
377.114
34,188
63.727
279
627
4,357.884
4,123,579
654,083
26,535
627.548
94.050
2,763
15,006
20.812
1.076
2.532
16,329,176
15,838,658
43,003
60,609
560,221
33,909
23,287
40,290,739
37,418,071
2,344,450
1,963.647
1.543.708
163,021
1,380,687
45.905
-1,725
'35,IB4
'12,895
M,746
10.614
3.047
8.442.056
7,564,220
733.440
392.490
1,746,738
-3,827
-9,006
'20.326
83.457
'17.138
280,208
183,039
100.333
594,464
130.591
56,877
181,214
145,478
38,822
303.065
31.688
35,287
167,331
155.361
135.027
200,131
1,125.326
1.1154.067
'21,610
9,807
63,627
34,742
478,620
311,159
185.961
157,330
133,435
142,751
106,613
190,520
135,460
337,757
Total liabilities ....................................................
2,593,918
224,373
69,152
449,373
243,807
288,827
305,975
1,012,412
Accounts payable and accrued expenses ....................
Grants payable .......................................................
Support and revenue held for future periods ................
Loans from officers, directors. trustees, etc. ................
Mortgages and other notes payable ...........................
Other liabilities .......................................................
423.918
1,264,317
73,222
12,191
*196.053
13,468
-11,221
-1,131
'14,997
.1.109
-15,581
23,965
19,480
73,343
11.584
2.160
55,819
81,421
101,648
78,229
11,425
80,624
16,901
28,306
164,644
7,506
1,169
76,667
27,682
200,952
656,852
-
418,791
407,191
47,871
83.974
'38,900
-2,041
160,381
116,204
Net worth ............................................................
Total receipts ....................................................
45,633,125
9,126,529
167,290
267,211
3,255,646
873,963
10,704,286
2,076,409
5,604,630
1,068,363
4,472,511
925,567
4,848,458
1,157,087
16,580,304
2,756,916
Contributions, gifts and grants received .......................
Membership dues and assessments ...........................
Interest on savings and temporary cash investments .....
DWridends and interest from securities ........................
Gross rents ...........................................................
Net gain (or loss) from sale of assets ........................
Gross profit from business activities ...........................
Other income .........................................................
2.679,359
24,482
799,713
2.970,206
181,971
1,783,651
113,222
573,924
'935
.58
220.893
*494
27,096
15,168
1,826
456,347
-4,323
85,901
191,479
31,138
56.517
-10,713
37,544
648,559
13,583
250.788
655,296
60,233
301,431
79,415
67,105
342,829
5,893
117,118
382,674
27.316
145.103
16,664
30,765
236,746
132
103,443
347,350
29,413
132,069
1.201
75,214
565,056
73,261
294,187
11.995
178,821
253
33,513
207,995
142,085
1,084,051
21,101
968.751
4,975
327,957
Total deductions ................................................
5,834,328
-1,411
459,720
717,455
1,489,615
769,213
634,432
415,888
1,346,594
Contributions, gifts. and grants paid ...........................
Compensation of officers ... ......................................
Other salaries and wages .........................................
Pension plans. employee benefits ..............................
Investment, legal and other professional services .........
Interest .................................................................
Taxes ...................................................................
Depreciation and depletion .......................................
Occupancy ............................................................
Other expenses ......................................................
4.477.761
105.365
254,176
50,572
144,007
35,859
177.208
51,080
33,411
504,889
417,074
'767
-8
3.987
584,416
8,272
35,243
-5,481
13,038
1,334
9,086
4,111
598,934
15,587
35,395
6,437
18,793
6,997
25,794
8,118
3,781
49,377
4W766
10,798
19,595 4,758
14,549
2,757
32,574
9,795
2,887
47,953
304,541
10.514
' 20,771
5,342
13,046
1
7,648
19,233
4,948
3,343
26,502
981,129
23,119
52.290
17,730
34,638
2,876
49,501
4,418
8,727
172,165
Net Income (less deficit) .................................
3,292,200
Nei income ...........................................................
Deficit ...................................................................
4,274.832
982,631
Total assets (fair market value) .....................
Beginning of year assets (book value)
total ..............................................................
Selected beginning of year assets:
~nvestmen
t
nts in securities .......................................
river; me t-purpose land, buildings, and equipment
(Less accumulated depreciation) ...........................
-1,013
816,874
168,370
648,504
3,915
-3,125
-3,158
tinder
S25.000.000
161,456
44,544
116,913
'11,036
-7.730
-3.911
176,114
142,955
Selected fair market value assets:
Cash, total .........................................................
Investments in securities .......................................
Investment-purpose land. buildings. and equipment
(Loss accumulated depreciation) ..........................
Charitable-purpose land, buildings and equipment
(Loss accumulated depreciation) ..........................
-
13,700
391,663
Size of total book value of assets
$10.000.000
$1.000,000
46,110
-6,755
cm
28,587
126,020
53.103
1,101.782
36.305
90,826
10.816
45.951
14,096
40,251
18,062
9,380
122,145
--397
-192,510
156,508
586,794
299,150
291,135
741,199
1,410,323
*398
41,920
234,430
296,080
139,573
772,941
186,147
402,368
103,218
362,806
71.671
778,688
37.489
1,620,028
209,706
62,886,606
409,055
3,839,783
13,891,391
8,052,683
6,949,015
6,800,151
22,9449528
4.597,266
49,822,624
160.188
173,432
808,172
2,342,702
1,530,035
9,600,908
638,609
6,174,613
400,436
5,464,150
406,378
5,329,804
653,449
20.737,016
1,512,375
-3,827
108,412
513,696
262.340
208,233
86,411
329,455
1,491,368
'21,167
119.963
583,085
244,341
247,562
126,051
149.199
-1,118
'4 ~
'56
-4
-
-
769
-1,627
-1,923
33,415
T)
-
43,181,895
*398
578,248
3,139,067
10,225,418
5,448,507
4,305,161
4,303,934
15,181,162
31,673,360
-
142,686
1,948,726
6.838,747
3,998,511
3,135,425
3,239,446
12,369,819
-7.355
81,291
167,487
142,090
137,6S'l
25,45~
150,726
712,05`1
1
*Estimt:nshould be used with caution because of the small number of Sample returns on which it is based.
'Less th
$500.
NOTE: Detail may not add to total because of rounding.
I
Private Foundation Information Returns, 1982
Table 3.-All Foundations: Balance Sheets and Income Statements, by Size of Total Fair Market Value of Assets
23
[Money amounts are in thousands of dollars]
Size of total fair market value of assets
Item
(3)
$100,000
under
$1,000,DDO
(4)
Number of returns .............................................
28,468
Total assets (Book value) ................................ 48,227,043
1,515
-6,107
f3,F37
_ _
408,901
9,12
2,981,006
3,771
10,096,084
Cash, total .............................................................
Non-interest bearing accounts ................................
Savings and temporary cash investments .................
Accounts receivable, net ..........................................
Pledges receivable, not ............................................
Grants receivable ....................................................
Receivables due from disqualified persons ..................
Other notes and loans receivable, not ........................
Inventori a .............................................................
Prepaid expenses and defamed charges .....................
Investments, total ...................................................
Securities ...........................................................
Land, buildings, and equipment (Loss accumulated
depreciation) ....................................................
Mortgage loans ...................................................
Other investments ...............................................
Charitable-purpose land, buildings and equipment (Less
accumulated depreciation) .....................................
Other assets ..........................................................
4.643,217
490,462
4,15Z755
247,814
14,853
43.003
60,609
560,221
33.909
23,287
40,290,739
37,418,071
-2,218
-2,031
*187
-
161,414
43,745
117,669
11.036
-7,730
726,42
134,53
591,885
2,883
-3,125
-1,376
46,110
-6,755
-3,814
-3,814
190,967
155,798
2,111,743
1,770,325
1,528,103
187,276
1,340.827
37.616
-1,725
'38,341
-12,895
268,493
10,623
3,337
7,441,897
6,579,417
733,440
392,490
1.746.738
-
-3,827
77,984
'17,070
246.363
170,751
100,167
591,562
'24.037
9,807
60,841
21.734
446,181
306,872
181,203
161,173
139,197
95,554
108,836
111.269
164,955
477,658
Total liabilities ....................................................
2,593,918
*20
224,354
60,120
437,728
218,052
223,281
Accounts payable and accrued expenses ....................
Grants payable .......................................................
Support and revenue held for future periods................
Loans from officers, directors, trustees, etc . ................
Mortgages and other notes payable ...........................
Other liabilities .......................................................
423,918
1,264,317
73,222
6.479
418,791
407,191
-12,172
196.053
-
9,031
-11,221
18,578
69,532
17.4D6
2,160
50.540
59,837
18,611
83,261
5,603
80,904
34,903
381,357
1,049,008
Net worth ............................................................
Total receipts .....................................................
459633,125
9,126,629
Contributions, gifts and grants received .......................
Membership dues and assessments ...........................
Interest on savings and temporary cash investments .....
Dividends and interest from securities ........................
Gross rents ...........................................................
Net gain (or loss) from sale of assets ........................
Gross profit from business activities ...........................
Other income .........................................................
5,749,762
1,010,618
4,527,953
767,421
319,503
119,536
371,605
30,613
134,937
3,997
24,531
188,382
132
110.388
274,475
25.951
123,135
13,784
31,173
539,185
75,703
281,222
13,043
179,007
337
76,746
305,960
160,019
1.286,232
29,414
1,025,662
4,975
339,562
Total deductions ................................................
527,937
1,581,598
390,319
10,980
20,294
5.108
15.750
8,183
29.174
6.206
3,641
38,281
1,174.935
26,771
59,953
20,084
37,456
3,278
58,126
5,196
9,479
186,321
1,570,226
Contributions, gifts. and grants paid ...........................
Compensation of officers ..........................................
Other salaries and wages ........................................
Pension plans, employee benefits ..............................
Investment, legal and other professional services .........
Interest .................................................................
Taxes ...................................................................
Depreciation and depletion .......................................
Occupancy ............................................................
Other expenses ......................................................
Total
u Assets
zero of
nreportod
(2)
$1 under
$lC10000
.
1,125,326
1,184,067
22,337
$1,000.000
under
$10,000,000
(5)
$10.000.000
nder
$25.000,000
u
S25,000,000
under
$50,000,000
493
5,967,814
162
4,751,234
as
4,639,926
80
19,375,972
622.003
36,558
5a5,445
39,272
10,000
1,823
23,603
92,808
12,233
13,887
4.809,809
4,466,902
453,605
29,826
423,779
25,795
2
75
1
44,308
2.761
2,839
3,987,095
3,534,173
386,393
26,011
360.382
32,076
57,020
291
506
3,943,535
3.652,311
763,060
30,477
732,583
99,136
2,763
1 5,0D6
47,570
1,245
2,701
17.801,878
17,255,330
128,087
40,328
174,493
136,416
47,713
268,794
46,564
35,299
209.360
169,812
142,906
233,830
(6)
$50.000,000
under
$100,01)(3,000
$100.000 ,000
or more
(8)
(9)
*11,11311
'14,997
-1,109
-15,581
19,370
47,155
'69,741
'38,900
2,041
160,381
119,509
113,472
148,122
7,506
1,169
81,667
29.420
-6,087
6,906
184,547
264,945
2,920,886
662,390
9,658,355
2,097,182
2,679,359
24,482
799.713
2,970,206
181,971
1,7113,651
113,222
573,924
-5,673
216,874
*276
27,282
15,332
*775
3,228
349,425
-1,902
74,813
174,098
5,776
41,700
-4.263
10,414
754,358
'16,002
231,696
566.829
76,398
277,832
85,865
88.201
5,834,328
6,721
458,142
524,324
1,515,561
746,610
473,535
4.477.761
105,365
254,176
50,572
144,DO7
35,859
177,208
51,080
33,411
504,889
-5,6530
-4
'206
-
414,534
456,305
7,514
12,421
.1.900
11,003
1,324
7.615
1,727
594,660
14,680
32.096
4,914
21,888
6.649
19,247
8,070
3,785
40.521
342,470
10,852
22,608
4,691
12,950
2,466
25,149
9,46
2,793
40,090
293,886
637,306
366,377
72,491
674,890
37,5114
1,795,134
224,907
204,879
686,387
28.587
129,155
4,258,569 18,326,964
1,165,244 3,151,824
23,579
1.098,908
33,798
106,598
13,866
40,906
13,807
36,925
17,899
10,854
142,001
Net Income (less deficit) .................................
3,292,200
'186
-1939198
138,065
581,621
264,108
Net income ...........................................................
Deficit ...................................................................
4,274,832
982,631
-1,048
*862
41,734
234,932
246,205
108,140
775,798
194,177
373.646
109,538
Total assets (fair market value) .....................
62,886,606
416,696
39262,919
11,981,973
7,543,920
5,816,8 2
6,035,403
27,828,843
4,597,266
49,822,624
161,161
176,924
718,922
1,975,788
1,514,107
8,080,023
617,710
5,571,440
430765
4,445:653
389,131
4,657,527
765,469
24.915,268
1,512,375
-3,827
99,361
329.802
338,938
254,981
88,845
396,621
1,491.368
'22,825
75,226
562,264
225,"0
213,312
212,698
179,600
-5,902
596,194
2,796,059
9,279,226
6,535,151
4,286,246
3,884,496
16,798,623
-3,902
153,405
1,789,958
5,889,219
4,168,101
3,192,05
2,957,995
-7,355
75.818
161,048
109,502
Selected fair market value assets:
Cash, total .........................................................
Investments in securities .......................................
Investment-purpose land, buildings, and equipment
(Loss accumulated depreciation) ..........................
Charitable-purpose land, buildings, and equipment
(Less accumulated depreciation) ..........................
Beginning of year assets (book value). .......
tot al
- ...............................................................
Selected beginning of year assets;
Investments in securities ........................................
Investment-purpose land, buildings, and equipment
(Less accumulated depreciation) ...........................
43,181,89
31,673,360
712.059
.8
3,871
-
920
-2,517
-1,923
33,452
*Estimate should be used with caution because of the small number of sample returns on which it is based.
'Lew than $5D0.
NOTE: Detail my not add to total because of rounding.
`1
157.821
13,518,721
1
37,5041
163,005
24
Private Foundation Information Returns, 1982
Balance
Sheet*and Income Statement Items, and Reconciliation of Net Worth, by Size of
Table 4.-All Foundations: Selected
Total Fair Market Value of Assets
[Money amounts are in thousands of dollars]
Sure of total fm market vahA of assets
Total
Item
All foundations, total ..............................
Assets zero or
unreported
Number
Of
returns
Amount
(1)
(2)
Number Of
returns
(3)
$1 Urder $100.000
Amount
Number Of
returns
(4)
(5)
$10-0.000 under $1,000.000
Amount
Number of
returns
(6)
(7)
$1.000.000
UrKler $10,000,000
Amount
Number Of
returns
Amount
(8)
(9)
(10)
28,468 62,886,606
1,515
-
13,237
416,696
9,125
3,262,919
3,771 11,981,F73-
27.58
3,771 10,096,084
Foundations with -
48,227,043
*631
-6,107
13,237
408,901
9,125
2,981,006
Selected assets:
Cash , total ..............................................
Investments in securities ............................
26,507
16,815
4.643,217
37.418.071
I'm
-2,218
-3,814
12.795
5,535
161,414
155,798
8.830
7.104
726,422
1.770,325
3,606
3,348
1,528,103
6,579.417
Total liabilities ..........................................
7,001
2,593,918
147
*20
2,210
224,354
2,452
60,120
1,627
437,728
Selected liabilities:
Contributions , gifts. and grants payable .........
Mortgages and other notes payable .............
1,142
464
1,264,317
418,791
-
-
:589
147
'196053
:211
126
'11,221
'15,581
176
155
69.741
160,381
27,584 45,633,125
*631
-6,087
13,237
184,547
9,125
2,920,886
3,771
9,658,355
Total assets (Book value) ....................
Net worth/fund balances (end of
year) ..........................................................
Reconciliation of net worth/fund
balances:
Net worth/fund balances (beginning of year).....
Plus:
Net income .............. ... . ...........................
Other increases ........................................
Minus:
Deficit ........ . . ...........................................
Other decreases .......................................
Equals:
Not worth/fund balances (end of year) .........
Total receipts ..........................................
Selected receipts:
Contributions. gifts, and grants received ........
Interest on savings and temporary cash
investments ..........................................
Dividends and interest from securities ..........
Net capital gain........................................
Net short-term capital gain .........................
Total deductions ......................................
Selected deductions:
Contributions , gifts, and grants paid .............
Compensation of officers .1 .........................
Investment legal and other professional
servioes ............ . ...................... . .........
Total assets (fair market value) ..........
Cash, total ... ..............................................
Non-interest bearing accounts .....................
Savings and temporary cash investments ....
Accounts receivable. net ...............................
Pledges receivable, net .................................
Grants receivable .........................................
Receivables due from disqualified persons ........
Other notes and loans receivable, net .............
Inventories ..................................................
Prepaid expenses and deferred charges ...........
Investments, total .........................................
securities ................................................
Land, buildings, and equipment (Less
accumulated depreciation) ............. .........
Mortgage loans ........................................
Other investments .....................................
Charitable-purpose land, buildings, and
equipment (Loss accumulated depreciation ....
Other assets ..........................................
Footnotes at end of table.
27,283
40.807,229
12,648
332,050
9,125
2,743.832
3,771
8,840,121
15,896
5,170 ,
4,274.833
1,818.190
-1,048
-
6,376
2.210
41,734
52.714
6,041
1,642
246,206
57,482
2,547
1,017
775,798
259,238
11.064
4.928
982,632
284,495
-
6,124
2,357
234,932
7,018
2,915
1,578
108,141
18,494
1.215
786
194,177
22,624
'926
27,5B4
45.633,125
-6.087
13,237
184,547
9,125
2,920,886
3,771
9,658,355
27,603
9,126,529
-1,368
-6,906
12,606
264,945
9,040
662,390
3,771
2,097,182
13,222
2,679,359
-1,221
-5,673
6,376
216,874
3,621
349,425
1.670
754,358
18"
17,389
5,513
2,699
27,645
799, 713
2970,206
1 :754,665
461.233
5,834,328
8,334
5,787
27,282
15,332
-1 , 885
6,283
7,356
2, 210
968
9,040
74,813
174,098
65 ,742
16.358
524,324
2,631
3,276
2, 021
962
3,771
231,696
566.829
244,538
35,845
1,515,561
23,806
5,135
4,477,761
105,365
-1,031
3,429
1,371
1,098.908
33,798
14,532
144.007
26,953 62,886,606
25,829
4,597,266
549,787
19.890
4.047479
16904
235:831
2:781
-20,851
*55
43 ,001
60
116
35,929
1,676
552,997
287
45.106 504
40.587
19,110
54,020,4 34
17,025
49,822,624
.337
-
1,515
6,721
*442
12,500
-5,630
-4
9,954
-1,178
414,534
8,619
1,895
456,305
7.514
5,156
13,-237
12,648
9,323
7597
. 1:178
-
3,871
416,696
161,161
47,447
113714
5,357
~9,125
8.7118
7,009
6,031
600
'42
-
-3.911
505
6 ,903
5,935
210,642
176,924
126
7, 819
6,967
11,003
3,262"919
718,922
134,526
584396
2:882
-3,125
-1,376
46 .029
-9 ,844
'20,897
2,325 ,920
1,975.788
458,142
40,906
2,933
-3,771 11,981,973
3,605
1,514,107
2,908
190,632
2,684
1,323476
704
32:940
-1,725
*52
-38,341
454
125
271
3, 585
3,347
262.449
10 ,455
4,152
9,181,129
8,080,023
1,727
1,018
3,520
1.512,375
418,754
2,266,681
-1 ,010
-3,827
-8,D02
*21 . 889
632
*253
1 , 231
99,361
- 53,936
196 ,834
467
382
1 .037
329,802
94,362
676,942
2591
7:"l
1,491,366
1,803,231
779
3,094 .
'22821
10:02
716
2,368
75,228
58.695
777
1,541
562,264
374,368
Private Foundation Information Returns, 1982
25
Table 4.-All Foundations: Selected Balance Sheet and Income Statement Items, and Reconciliation of Net Worth, by Size of
Total Fair Market Value of Assets - Continued
[Money amounts are in thousands of dollars]
S= of total fair market value of assets - Continued
Item
$10,000,000
under $25,000,000
Number
raumSof
S25 000,000
under $50,000.000
Amount
(12)
All foundations, total ......................................................................
Foundations with Total assets (Book value) ..............................................................
Selected assets:
Cash. total..,...
.........................................................................
Investments in securities ....................................................................
Total liabilities .................................................................................
Selected liabilities:
Contributions, gifts, and grants payable .................................................
Mortgages and other notes payable ......................................................
Net worth/fund balances (end of year) ......................................
Reconciliation of net worth/fujid balances:
Net worth/fund balances (beginning of yew) ..............................................
Plus:
Not income .............................................................................
Other increases ................................................................................
Minus:
Deficit .............................................................................................
Other decreases ...............................................................................
Equals:
Net worth/fund balances (end of year) .................................................
Total receipts ...................................................................................
Selected receipts:
Contributions, gifts, and grants received ................................................
Interest on savings and temporary cash investments ...............................
Dividends and interest from securities ....................................................
Net capital gain .................................................................................
Not short-term capital gain ..................................................................
Total deductions .............................................................................
Selected deductions:
Contributions, gifts. and grants paid ......................................................
Compensation of officers ....................................................................
Investment legal and other professional services .....................................
Total assets (fair market value) ..................................................
Cash. total ..........................................................................................
Non-interest bearing accounts .............................................................
Savings and temporary cash investments ...............................................
Accounts receivable. not .........................................................................
Pledges receivable, not .........................................................................
Grants receivable ..........................................................................
Receivables due from disqualified persons .................................................
Other notes and loans receivable, not ......................................................
Inventori ...........................................................................................
Prepaid expenses and deferred charges ....................................................
Investments, total .................................................................................
Securities .........................................................................................
Land, buildings, and equipment (Loss accumulated depreciation) .................
Mortgage loans ..................................................................................
Other investments ......................................... ....................................
Charitable-purpose land. buildings, and equipment (Less accumulated
depreciation) .....................................................................................
Other assets ........................................................................................
Number of
returns
(13)
$50,000,000
under $100.000.000
$100,000.
or more
Amount
Number of
returns
Amount
Number of
returns
Amount
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
491
7,543,92q
16A
5,816,854 -
$51
6,035,40~
86 27,828,843
493
5,967,81
162
4,751,234
81
4,633:~,9~j
80 19,375,972
477
470
317
622,00
4,466,90
218,05
155
154
113
453.605
3.534,173
223,281
67
19
49~
69,53
50,
5,749,71
W
6
38
9
16A
83,261
80,904
4,527,9531
491
5,352,35C
16C
4,095,532
84
3,538,426
79
15,899,015
341
163
373.646
163,536
123
57
366.377
167,981
71
39
674,89C
147,089
61
43
1,795,134
970,149
ISO
115
109,538
30.233
38
37
72.491
29,446
14
27
37,584
64,254
19
28
224,907
112,426
4~258 56"
888,
18,326,964
3
3,151,824
3
493
49
6
81
33
148,1
81,665
4,258,56
574976
0
162
4,527.953
85
9.,
61
161
767,421
85
1,0
19
19
3
9
~6152'~3511
810
80
69
763.060
17 255.330
1,049,008
'
41
686.387
3
28,587
801 18,326,964
31 '50
61
188,382
41
119,53
371,60
171,37,
38,70,
539,185
135
153
102
71
110,388
274,475
141,992
28,321
65
82
58
37
75,703
281,222
202,586
44,297
1
61
51
746,51
161
473,535
a
527,937
8
305,960
160,019
1,286,232
926,549
297,225
1,581,598
464
287
453
594,6611
14.68(
21,=
151
Its
144
342,47
10,85
12.9
7
390,319
10,980
~.7-
78
70
76
1,174.935
26,771
37,456
493
475
387
360
173
7,543,92C
617,71(
36,25,
581,45(
35,907
162
155
129
112
63
10.00()
1,821
8
7
6
6
7
351
310
6,035,403
1
389131
31:767
357,364
32,102
80
79
65
64
33
27,828,843
765,469
3
5,816,85
430,76
78,47
352,281
i
26.205
1
-
3,000
-
19,505
97,013
19,814
10,724
6.278,018
5,57144
338:93
38,121
329,520
1
31
13
25
161
155
43
24
49
1
43,614
3.140
2,836
5.042,504
4.445,6
254981
49:
225,440
227,968
~71
21331
54:391
1
31
1
49
1
4
5
65
12
51
478
461
1
11
-Eftmate should be used with MUbDn because of the small number of sample retums on which It 0 based.
NOTE: Detall my not add to toted because of rounifirIg.
75
17
6
17
84
81
26
13
292,
4
51
53.57
31
49
5,062.3
4,65752
88:841
L,
35,29
2801.68
212~6
281,7
1
1
5
15
5
14
so
3
'1
30,686
734,783
97,667
3,000
2,763
15,006
46,402
1,540
1,484
25,919,860
24,915,268
396,621
139,826
468,145
179,600
796,052
Private Foundation Information Returns, 1982
26
Foundations:
Minimum
Investment Return, Distributable Amount, Qualifying Distributions, and
Table 5.-Nonoperating
Undistributed Income, by Size of Total Assets not Held for Charitable Purposes
[Money amounts are in thousands of dollars)
Size of total assets not hold fm charftable purposes
Total
Item
Nono rating foundation returns,
totaIr.............................
Computation of minimum
***...Investment
* .... *'**"**'***...
return:
Fair marks value of assets not used directly in
carrying tZ charitable purposes. total ...........
Minus:
Acquisition indebtedness .............................
Cash hold for charitable purposes ................
Equals: Base for computing minimum investment
return ...
Minim
i nvestment return I[iiii;-6-i
base) .........................................................
Computation of distributable amount for 1982:
Minimum investment return .............................
Minus:
Tax on investment income ..........................
Income tax under subtitle A ........................
Equals: Distributable amount before adjustments.
Not adjustments ...........................................
Positive adjustments ..................................
N
tiv djustments ................................
DIS
I=
ributable
" a
amount, adjusted ........
Total qualifying distributions ................
Disbursements for charitable purposes .......
Program-related investments ....................
Amounts paid to acquire chantable-use assets...,
Amounts set aside for charitable projects:
Under the suitability test .............................
Under the cash distribution test ...................
Undistributed Income for 1982 .............
Excess distributions carryover to
1983 ............................................................
-
Number
Of
MbAnS
Amount
(1)
(2)
25,36M 50,028,87M
Assets zem oir
unreported
Number of
Amount
returns
(4)
(3)
$1 under $100,000
Number of
returns
(5)
2,36~
325,65~
325,654
-
10,439
271
22,941
106.805
748,377
-
-
10,439
22.995
49,173,693
-
-
2,458,280
2,352 63
9
ol~
44
47,25
3
229
2,397,98
4,872,48
4.666.65
4944
55:2
113
6,52
- 1
:24 17
.:22
663,501
15,585
4,857,481
-item
...........
Nonoperating foundation returns, total .................
Computation of minimum Investment return:
*'**"*"*
Fair market value of assets not used directly in carrying out charitable
purposes. total ...................................................................................
Minus:
Acquisition indebtedness ......................................................................
Cash held for charitable purposes .........................................................
E ails: Base for computing minimum investment return ...............................
mlhTmum Investment return (5% of base)..................................
Computation of distributable amount for 1982:
Minimum investment return .....................................................................
Minus:
Tax on investment income ...................................................................
Inco a tax under subtitle A .................................................................
EqualsmDistributable amount before adjustments .........................................
....................................................................................
Not adjustments
:
Positive adjustments ...........................................................................
Ne,fI ative adjustments ..........................................................................
Dis ributable amount, adjusted ................................................
Total qualifying distributions ........................................................
Disbursements for charitable purposes ......................................................
Program-related investments ....................................................................
Amounts paid to acquire charitable-use assets ...........................................
Amounts set aside for charitable projects:
Under the suitability test ................................................................
Under the cash distribution test ......................................................
Undistributed Income for 1982 ....................................................
Excess distributions carryover to 1983 .....................................
1 '27,21
1.271
53,5311
53,531
-
of
(8)
10,4391
-
20.951
~ 173
22,994
1,205
982
223
22,983
23,555
23555
12
37~
Amount
(6)
50,028,879
22,9951
Number
Amount
22.998
22,995 2,458,286
$100.000 under $1,000.000
4,893
$1,000,000
under $10,000.000
Number
Amo~unt
retLumsof
(10)
(9)
8,6381 2,948,8071
3922~ 9,824,368
8,638
2.948.807
3.229
9,824,368
8,596
43,971
115
3,217
40,918
147,581
10.439
320,759
8,638
2,904,448
3,227
9,635,8U
10,439
15,958
8,638
145,222
3,227
481,793
10,439
15,958
8,6538
145,222
3,227
481.793
8,586
587
6.236
3.207
20,765
10,439
-
8,470
137
-'638
*
138,392
-5,238
-5,297
3,227
147
96
460,946
12,570
14,667
3,217~
3,229
3,229
.53
69
1,175,376
1.145479
1 *1 r 718
14,076
*589
15,370
-4,281
-4,299
10,439
9,800
9,W
_I
19,651
728381
72'.61I
8,638
8;554
.554
.; 52
42
143,631
833,7
818.f53
4
-7.7.7
-7,854
2,6131
4,421
2,273
81
3 08
,
6,693I-1
150,1 -8
6,2
2,0 53,8 34
-
-4521
'144,204
Size of total assets not hold for charitable purposes-Confinued
$50,000,000
$10,000,000
$25,000,000
-_-under $100,000,000
under $25.000,000 under $50.000.000 Number
of
Number
of
Number of
Amount
Amount
Amount
returns
returns
returns
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(12)
66 4,666,254
434 6,353,0421
128 4,614,030
120
4,614,030
434
1
62 13
6~
g393
3i 1',§3
11 21
12
434
311,9321
1271
41:33
.7
4 501,'.3
-.71
2
1
;
225,280
433
12,411
329
192
5,611
5,612
434
6,353,0Q
12
.F):4
4.25
24
1
434
434
434
2193~
44,803
605,662
603,050
J
28~~
49691',0010~
- 16
00
710
*Eltmate should be used with caution because of the small number of sample returns on which it is based.
'A computation using less than 5 percent is allowed on returns covering an accounting period of less than one year.
21ndicates amount between -S500 and +$500.
NOTE: Detail my not add to total because of rounding.
12
11
126
1 1J
2
2
5C
7
473,515
104
136,145
1'30
1,
794
0
1,298,353
-
$100,0D0,000 or rnore
Number of
Amount
returns
(17)
(18)
64 21,296,720
4,666,2
64
21.296.720
66
6.:'
4 12
45928 111
2A641
4
64
64
64
8,209319,327
20,969,183
048,460
64
1,048,460
-1
40,483
968
1,007,009
2,993
2,993
66
229.641
49
1:71
1
213,414
3,204
3.232
27
216,619
406,967
400,363
73
%Z
66
66
8
7
1
66
60
11,33~
218,308
11,056
11,152
96
229,364
434
427.1
'?
2,561,
1~
63,70
247,10~
32
34
'701
6J4
1
64
6,2,1
'5
1,01
02
-0,
1,290,290
1,145444
24:807
21,595
(2) ,
67 714~
231,350
361
26
76,300
269,671
22'144
263,520
14
27
Private Foundation Information Returns, 1982
Table 6.-All Foundations VAth Total Book Value of Assets of $10 Million or More-Summary: Number of Foundations; Total
Book Value and Fair Market Value of Assets; Contributions, Gifts, and Grants Received; and Contributions, Gifts, and Grants
Paid; by State
[Money amounts are in 11hotisands of dollars]
Total assets
stats
United States, total ..........
Alabama ..................................
Alaska ....................................
Arizom . ................................
Arkansas ................................
California ................................
Colorado ................................
Conneclicut .............................
Delaware ................................
Florida ...................................
Georgia ..................................
Hawaii ....................................
claho .....................................
: 111nois ....................................
Indiana ...................................
Iowa ......................................
Karms ...................................
Kentucky ................................
Louisiana ................................
Maine ....................................
Mary" (Includes D.C.) ............
Massachusetts .........................
Michigan .................................
Minnesota ...............................
Mississippi ..............................
missoLlri ..................................
Montana .................................
Nebraska ................................
Nevada ..................................
Now Hampshire .......................
Now Jersey .............................
Now Mexico ............................
Now York ...............................
North Carolina .........................
North Dakota ...........................
Ohio ......................................
Oklahoma ...............................
On n ...................................
Pennsylvania ...........................
Rhode Island ...........................
South Carolina .........................
South Dakota ..........................
Tennessee ..............................
Texas ....................................
Utah ......................................
Vermont .................................
%ftnia ...................................
Washington .............................
West VWginla ...........................
Wisconsin ...............................
wyorning ................................
As othiwe ...............................
NunYaw
of
returns
Percent
(1)
(2)
620
2
2
61
8
14
13
14
10
3
29
11
2
2
1
6
19
11
is
Is
15
4
1
is
1
159
8
30
12
3
34
2
3
6
58
2
1
5
8
7
14
100.0
0.
0.
9.
1.
2.
2.1
2.
1. 1
0.5
4.7
1.8
0.3
0.3
0.2
1.0
3.1
1.8
2.6
2.9
2.4
0.6
0.2
3.1
0.2
25.6
1.3
4.8
101 ~
0.
1.
9.
0.
o..1
0.8
1.3
1.1
N/A
N/A - Not applicable.
'Lou than .05 pwcent.
NOTE: Detail may riot add to toted because of rounding.
I
Oft and grants,
Book value
Nwv6w
Of
retwnS
(3)
Fair nuuket value
Amount
Percent
(4)
(5)
620 32,825,180
60,054
30,885
61
4.952.662
320,137
1
422,400
1
463.944
1
405,056
1
256,769
55,453
29
1,712.889
11
369,107
2
41,204
2
29,783
1
135,689
6
100,791
19
422.855
11
223,189
16
1,386,717
18
1,376,942
15
373,378
4
102,934
1
22.168
19
1.093,896
1
26,957
159
11,249,493
8
454,026
30
669,772
12
493,692
3
194.057
34
1,950,849
2
26,291
47,653
3
a
246,741
58
2,387,084
2
39,672
1
24,20'Z
5
179,05~
8
250.93(
7
235,9D(
14
531,74C
IOCLO
0.2
0.1
15.1
1.0
1.3
1A
1.2
0.8
0.2
5.2
1.1
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.3
11.3
0.7
4.2
4.2
1.1
0.3
0.1
3.3
0.1
34.3
1.4
2.0
1.5
0.6
5.9
0.1
0.1
0.8
7.3
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.8
0.7
N/A
Nunber
Of
retums
(6)
Amount
(7)
620 43,547,780
2
2
61
8
14
13
14
10
3
29
11
2
2
1
6
19
11
16
18
15
4
1
19
1
159
8
30
12
3
34
2
3
6
58
2
1
5
60,057
36,374
5,779,irli
,
427,01
546, 211
603.
444.12
411,3
78,871
2.985,740
994.399
42,636
36.013
135,592
161,744
658,395
319,517
1.789,727
1 ~M,744
531,265
121,816
24,257
1,985,558
27,194
13,296,293
752,272
860,265
1,046,549
205.249
3,108.441
26,023
50,300
301,542
3,512.282
42.312
25,521
190,394
1.198.5
280,
5.45
Received
Percent
-- (a)
NumIW
Of
reurns(9)
Paid
Amount
Percent
- - - -_
(10) (11)
Number
Of
retumS
(12)
Amount
Percent
(13)
(14)
100A
262
1,352,453
100.0
583
2,254,342
100.0
0.1
0.1
13,1
1.0
1.3
1.4
1.0
0.9
0.2
6.9
2.3
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.4
1.5
0.7
4.1
3.2
1.2
0.3
0.1
4.6
0.1
30.5
1.7
2.0
2.4
0.5
7.1
0.1
0.1
0.7
8.1
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.6
0.6
1
1
21
3
9
2
4
1
14
4
1
1
3
1
24,924
3,500
177,1101
2,851
5,135
43,055
8,764
9,122
44,993
10,498
10,890
17,03(
12,44(
11,6&
74(
84.18(
16,35(
1.8
0.3
13,11
0.2
0.4
3.2
0.6
0.7
3.
0.
0.
1.3
0.9
0.9
0.1
6.2
1.2
2
2
51
7
12
13
11
10
3
24
10
2
2
1
4
16
a
15
18
2,134
2,114
236,096
20,423
63,478
28.911
16,738
21.267
6,991
142,841
63,217
2,779
1,502
6,381
2.773
26,542
11,914
138,180
81,974
0.1
0.1
10*5
0.9
2.4
1.3
0.8
0.9
0.3
6.3
2.8
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.1
1.2
0.5
6.1
3.6
19,404
1,451
301
3.914
307.950
532
29.289
13,549
120,201
84.619
1
io
48,857
223.527
10
8,736
6,154
1.4
0.1
14
3
1
17
Ise
8
29
12
3
33
2
3
6
57
2
1
5
7
39,175
5,509
1,473
40,770
588,363
53,442
56,613
39,491
4.710
204,164
1,554
3,390
18,063
286,049
3,667
231
9,400
14,960
15,056
1.7
0.2
0.1
1.0
26.1
2.4
2.5
1.8
0.2
9.1
0.1
0.2
0.8
12.7
0.2
37,482
N/A
N/A
1
9
69
3
12
8
1
10
1
1
3
28
-
-
1
(1)
0.3
22.8
2.2
1.0
8.9
6.3
3.6
16.5
0.6
0.5
-
-
0.4
0.7
0.7
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.