Bulletin No. 2023–26

Agency decision

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

HIGHLIGHTS

OF THIS ISSUE





Bulletin No. 2023–26

June 26, 2023

These synopses are intended only as aids to the reader in

identifying the subject matter covered. They may not be

relied upon as authoritative interpretations.

ADMINISTRATIVE

Notice 2023-42, page 1085.

This notice provides relief from the addition to tax under §

6655 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) in connection with

the application of the new corporate alternative minimum tax

(CAMT), as added to Code by the enactment of § 10101 of

Public Law 117-169, 136 Stat. 1818 (August 16, 2022), commonly referred to as the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA).

INCOME TAX

Notice 2023-46, page 1086.

This notice publishes the inflation adjustment factor for the

carbon oxide sequestration credit under § 45Q for calendar

year 2023. The inflation adjustment factor is used to determine the amount of the credit allowable under § 45Q for

taxpayers that make an election under § 45Q(b)(3) to have

the dollar amounts applicable under § 45Q(a)(1) or (2) apply.

Notice 2023-49, page 1087.

This notice publishes the reference price under § 45K(d)(2)

(C) of the Internal Revenue Code for calendar year 2022.

The reference price applies in determining the amount of the

enhanced oil recovery credit under § 43, the marginal well

production credit for qualified crude oil production under §

45I, and the applicable percentage under § 613A to be used

in determining percentage depletion in the case of oil and

natural gas produced from marginal properties.

Finding Lists begin on page ii.

REG-110412-23, page 1098.

This notice of proposed rulemaking contains proposed

rules concerning the low-income communities bonus energy

investment credit program established pursuant to the

Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. Applicants investing in certain solar and wind powered-electricity generation facilities

may apply for an allocation of environmental justice solar and

wind capacity limitation to increase the amount of an energy

investment credit for the taxable year in which the facility is

placed in service. This document describes proposed definitions and requirements that would be applicable for the

program allocating the calendar year 2023 capacity limitation, which also would inform guidance applicable for future

program years. The proposed rules would affect applicants

seeking allocations of environmental justice solar and wind

capacity limitation.

INCOME TAX, TAX CONVETIONS

REG-106228-22, page 1088.

This NPRM contains proposed regulations that would identify

transactions that are the same as, or substantially similar

to, certain Malta personal retirement scheme transactions as

listed transactions, a type of reportable transaction. Material

advisors and participants in these listed transactions would

be required to file disclosures with the IRS and be subject

to penalties for failure to disclose. These proposed regulations would affect participants in these transactions as well

as material advisors.

The IRS Mission

Provide America’s taxpayers top-quality service by helping

them understand and meet their tax responsibilities and

enforce the law with integrity and fairness to all.

Introduction

The Internal Revenue Bulletin is the authoritative instrument

of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for announcing official rulings and procedures of the Internal Revenue Service

and for publishing Treasury Decisions, Executive Orders, Tax

Conventions, legislation, court decisions, and other items of

general interest. It is published weekly.

It is the policy of the Service to publish in the Bulletin all substantive rulings necessary to promote a uniform application

of the tax laws, including all rulings that supersede, revoke,

modify, or amend any of those previously published in the

Bulletin. All published rulings apply retroactively unless otherwise indicated. Procedures relating solely to matters of internal management are not published; however, statements of

internal practices and procedures that affect the rights and

duties of taxpayers are published.

Revenue rulings represent the conclusions of the Service

on the application of the law to the pivotal facts stated in

the revenue ruling. In those based on positions taken in rulings to taxpayers or technical advice to Service field offices,

identifying details and information of a confidential nature are

deleted to prevent unwarranted invasions of privacy and to

comply with statutory requirements.

Rulings and procedures reported in the Bulletin do not have the

force and effect of Treasury Department Regulations, but they

may be used as precedents. Unpublished rulings will not be

relied on, used, or cited as precedents by Service personnel in

the disposition of other cases. In applying published rulings and

procedures, the effect of subsequent legislation, regulations,

court decisions, rulings, and procedures must be considered,

and Service personnel and others concerned are cautioned

against reaching the same conclusions in other cases unless

the facts and circumstances are substantially the same.

The Bulletin is divided into four parts as follows:

Part I.—1986 Code.

This part includes rulings and decisions based on provisions

of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

Part II.—Treaties and Tax Legislation.

This part is divided into two subparts as follows: Subpart A,

Tax Conventions and Other Related Items, and Subpart B,

Legislation and Related Committee Reports.

Part III.—Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous.

To the extent practicable, pertinent cross references to these

subjects are contained in the other Parts and Subparts. Also

included in this part are Bank Secrecy Act Administrative

Rulings. Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rulings are issued

by the Department of the Treasury’s Office of the Assistant

Secretary (Enforcement).

Part IV.—Items of General Interest.

This part includes notices of proposed rulemakings, disbarment and suspension lists, and announcements.

The last Bulletin for each month includes a cumulative index

for the matters published during the preceding months. These

monthly indexes are cumulated on a semiannual basis, and are

published in the last Bulletin of each semiannual period.

The contents of this publication are not copyrighted and may be reprinted freely. A citation of the Internal Revenue Bulletin as the source would be appropriate.

June 26, 2023 

Bulletin No. 2023–26

Part III

Relief from Certain

Additions to Tax

for Corporation’s

Underpayment of

Estimated Income Tax

under Section 6655

Notice 2023-42

SECTION 1. OVERVIEW

This notice provides relief from the

addition to tax under § 6655 of the Internal

Revenue Code (Code)1 in connection with

the application of the new corporate alternative minimum tax (CAMT), as added

to the Code by the enactment of § 10101

of Public Law 117-169, 136 Stat. 1818

(August 16, 2022), commonly referred

to as the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022

(IRA).

SECTION 2. BACKGROUND

.01 CAMT under the IRA. Section

10101 of the IRA amended § 55 to impose

the new CAMT based on the “adjusted

financial statement income” (AFSI) of

an applicable corporation for taxable

years beginning after December 31, 2022.

Pursuant to § 59(k)(1), in general, a corporation is an applicable corporation subject

to the CAMT for a taxable year if it meets

the average annual AFSI test for one or

more taxable years that (i) are before that

taxable year and (ii) end after December

31, 2021 (Applicable Corporation).

Section 55(a) provides that, for the taxable year of an Applicable Corporation,

the amount of CAMT imposed by § 55

equals the excess (if any) of (i) the tentative minimum tax for the taxable year,

over (ii) the sum of the regular tax, as

defined in section § 55(c), for the taxable

year plus the tax imposed under § 59A.

Section 55(b)(2)(A) provides that, in the

case of an Applicable Corporation, the

tentative minimum tax for the taxable

1

year is the excess of (i) 15 percent of AFSI

for the taxable year (as determined under

§ 56A), over (ii) the CAMT foreign tax

credit for the taxable year (as determined

under § 59(l)). In the case of any corporation that is not an Applicable Corporation,

§ 55(b)(2)(B) provides that the tentative

minimum tax for the taxable year is zero.

See section 2.01 of Notice 2023-7, 2023-7

I.R.B. 390, for a general description of

the CAMT. Notice 2023-7 announced that

the Department of the Treasury (Treasury

Department) and the Internal Revenue

Service (IRS) intend to issue forthcoming

proposed regulations addressing the application of the CAMT and provided interim

guidance that taxpayers may rely on until

the issuance of the forthcoming proposed

regulations. Notice 2023-20, 2023-10

I.R.B. 523, provided additional interim

guidance that is intended to clarify further

the application of the CAMT.

.02 Estimated taxes. Section 6655(c)

and (d)(1)(A) generally provide that, in the

case of a corporation, estimated income tax

is required to be paid in four installments

and the amount of any required installment is 25 percent of the required annual

payment. Generally, under § 6655(d)

(1)(B), the required annual payment is

the lesser of two amounts described in

§ 6655(d)(1)(B)(i) and (ii). The amount

described in § 6655(d)(1)(B)(i) is 100

percent of the tax shown on the return for

the taxable year. The amount described in

§ 6655(d)(1)(B)(ii) is 100 percent of the

tax shown on the taxpayer’s return for

the preceding taxable year, so long as the

preceding taxable year was a full twelve

months long and the return for such year

showed a liability for tax. However, pursuant to § 6655(d)(2), in the case of a large

corporation (as defined under § 6655(g)

(2)), the amount described in § 6655(d)

(1)(B)(ii) may be applied only for purposes of determining the first installment

payment, while the amount described in

§ 6655(d)(1)(B)(i) must be applied for

purposes of determining the required

annual payment. Under § 6655(e), the

amount of the required installment is the

annualized income installment or adjusted

seasonal installment for those taxpayers

who establish that such amount is lower

than 25 percent of the required annual

payment determined under § 6655(d).

Section 6655(a) imposes an addition to

tax for failure to make a sufficient and

timely payment of estimated income tax.

SECTION 3. ESTIMATED TAXES

.01 Waiver of addition to tax. In light

of challenges associated with determining

whether a corporation is an Applicable

Corporation and the amount of a corporation’s CAMT liability under § 55 for a

taxable year that begins after December

31, 2022, and before January 1, 2024

(Covered CAMT Year), and in the interest

of sound tax administration, the IRS will

waive the addition to tax under § 6655

with respect to a corporation’s CAMT liability under § 55 for any Covered CAMT

Year. Accordingly, for a corporation’s

Covered CAMT Year, the corporation’s

required installments of estimated tax

need not include amounts attributable to

its CAMT liability under § 55 to prevent

the imposition of an addition to tax under

§ 6655. If a corporation fails to timely pay

its CAMT liability under § 55 when due,

other sections of the Code may apply;

for example, additions to tax could be

imposed under § 6651 if payment of the

CAMT liability is not made by the due

date (without regard to any extension) of

the corporation’s return.

.02 Instructions to be modified. The

instructions to Form 2220, Underpayment

of Estimated Tax by Corporations, will

be modified, as necessary, to clarify that

no addition to tax will be imposed under

§ 6655 based on a corporation’s failure to make estimated tax payments of

its CAMT liability under § 55 for any

Covered CAMT Year, and that a taxpayer

may exclude such amounts when calculating the amount of its required annual

payment on Form 2220. If necessary, the

modified instructions will be posted on

https://www.irs.gov.

Unless otherwise specified, all “section” or “§” references are to sections of the Code.

Bulletin No. 2023–26

1085

June 26, 2023

.03 Instructions to avoid penalty

notice. Affected taxpayers must still file

Form 2220 with their Federal income

tax return, even if they owe no estimated

tax penalty. The Form 2220 must be

completed without including the CAMT

liability from Schedule J of Form 1120,

U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return

(or other appropriate line of the corporation’s income tax return in the Form

1120 series). Affected taxpayers must

also include an amount of estimated tax

penalty on Line 34 of their Form 1120

(or other appropriate line of the corporation’s income tax return in the Form

1120 series), even if that amount is zero.

Failure to follow these instructions could

result in affected taxpayers receiving a

penalty notice that will require an abatement request to apply the relief provided

by this notice.

SECTION 4. APPLICABILITY

DATES

The waiver of the addition to tax

imposed by § 6655 described in section

3.01 of this notice applies for any Covered

CAMT Year.

SECTION 5. DRAFTING AND

CONTACT INFORMATION

The principal author of this notice

is David Bergman of the Office of the

Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and

Administration). Other personnel from the

Treasury Department and the IRS participated in its development. For further information, please contact David Bergman at

(202) 317-6845 (not a toll-free number).

Credit for Carbon Oxide

Sequestration 2023

Section 45Q Inflation

Adjustment Factor

Notice 2023-46

SECTION 1. PURPOSE

This notice publishes the inflation

adjustment factor for the credit for carbon

June 26, 2023

oxide sequestration under § 45Q of the

Internal Revenue Code (§ 45Q credit)

for calendar year 2023. The inflation

adjustment factor is used to determine

the amount of the credit allowable under

§ 45Q for taxpayers that make an election under § 45Q(b)(3) to have the dollar

amounts applicable under § 45Q(a)(1) or

(2) apply.

SECTION 2. BACKGROUND

Section 45Q was added to the Code

by § 115 of the Energy Improvement and

Extension Act of 2008, enacted as Division

B of Pub. L. 110-343, 122 Stat. 3765, 3829

(October 3, 2008), to provide a credit

for the sequestration of carbon dioxide.

Section 45Q was amended by § 1131 of

the American Recovery and Reinvestment

Tax Act of 2009, enacted as Division B of

Pub. L. 111-5, 123 Stat 115 (February 17,

2009), § 41119 of the Bipartisan Budget

Act of 2018 (BBA), Pub. L. No. 115-123

(February 9, 2018), § 121 of the Taxpayer

Certainty and Disaster Tax Relief Act

of 2020, enacted as Division EE of

the Consolidated Appropriations Act,

2021, Pub. L. 116-260, 134 Stat. 3051

(December 27, 2020), and § 13104 of Pub.

L. 117-169, 136 Stat. 1818 (August 16,

2022), commonly known as the Inflation

Reduction Act (IRA).

Section 45Q(a)(1) allows a credit of

$20 per metric ton of qualified carbon

oxide (i) captured by the taxpayer using

carbon capture equipment which is originally placed in service at a qualified

facility before the date of the enactment

of BBA, (ii) disposed of by the taxpayer

in secure geological storage, and (iii) not

used by the taxpayer as a tertiary injectant

in a qualified enhanced oil or natural gas

recovery project.

Section 45Q(a)(2) allows a credit of

$10 per metric ton of qualified carbon

oxide (i) captured by the taxpayer using

carbon capture equipment which is originally placed in service at a qualified

facility before the date of the enactment

of BBA, and (ii) either (I) used by the

taxpayer as a tertiary injectant in a qualified enhanced oil or natural gas recovery

project and disposed of by the taxpayer in

secure geological storage or (II) utilized

by the taxpayer in a manner described in

§ 45Q(f)(5).

1086

Section 45Q(b)(3) provides that, for

purposes of determining the carbon oxide

sequestration credit under this section,

a taxpayer may elect to have the dollar

amounts applicable under § 45Q(a)(1)

or (2) apply in lieu of the dollar amounts

applicable under § 45Q(a)(3) or (4) for

each metric ton of qualified carbon oxide

which is captured by the taxpayer using

carbon capture equipment which is originally placed in service at a qualified facility on or after the date of the enactment of

the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018.

Under § 45Q(f)(7), for taxable years

beginning in a calendar year after 2009,

the dollar amounts contained in § 45Q(a)

(1) and (2) must be adjusted for inflation

by multiplying such dollar amount by the

inflation adjustment factor for such calendar year determined under § 43(b)(3)(B),

determined by substituting “2008” for

“1990.”

Section 43(b)(3)(B) defines the term

“inflation adjustment factor” as, with

respect to any calendar year, a fraction the

numerator of which is the GNP implicit

price deflator for the preceding calendar

year and the denominator of which is the

GNP implicit price deflator for 1990. For

purposes of § 45Q(f)(7), for the 2022 calendar year, the inflation adjustment factor

is a fraction the numerator of which is

the GNP implicit price deflator for 2022

(127.194) and the denominator of which

is the GNP implicit price deflator for 2008

(94.421).

Section 45Q(g), as amended by

§ 13104(f) of the IRA, provides that in

the case of any carbon capture equipment

placed in service before the date of the

enactment of BBA, the credit under § 45Q

shall apply with respect to qualified carbon oxide captured using such equipment

before the earlier of January 1, 2023, and

the end of the calendar year in which the

Secretary of the Treasury or her delegate,

in consultation with the Administrator of

the Environmental Protection Agency,

certifies that, during the period beginning after October 3, 2008, a total of

75,000,000 metric tons of qualified carbon oxide have been taken into account in

accordance with (i) § 45Q(a), as in effect

on the day before the date of the enactment of BBA, and (ii) § 45Q(a)(1) and

(2). Notice 2022-38 provided that 2022

was the final calendar year for which a

Bulletin No. 2023–26

taxpayer may claim a § 45Q credit under

§ 45Q(a)(1) and (2) for qualified carbon

oxide that is captured by carbon capture

equipment originally placed in service

at a qualified facility before the date of

enactment of the Bipartisan Budget Act of

2018. Therefore, the inflation adjustment

amounts in section 3 of this notice only

apply if a taxpayer elects under § 45Q(b)

(3) to apply the dollar amounts applicable

under § 45Q(a)(1) or (2) in lieu of the dollar amounts applicable under § 45Q(a)(3)

or (4).

SECTION 3. INFLATION

ADJUSTMENT FACTOR

The inflation adjustment factor for

calendar year 2023 is 1.3471. The § 45Q

credit for calendar year 2023 is $26.94 per

metric ton of qualified carbon oxide under

§ 45Q(a)(1) and $13.47 per metric ton of

qualified carbon oxide under § 45Q(a)(2).

SECTION 4. DRAFTING

INFORMATION

The principal author of this notice is

Maggie Stehn of the Office of Associate

Chief Counsel (Passthroughs & Special

Industries). For further information

regarding this notice contact Maggie

Stehn at (202) 317-6853 (not a toll-free

number).

2022 Section 45K(d)(2)(C)

Reference Price

Notice 2023-49

SECTION 1. PURPOSE

This notice publishes the reference

price under § 45K(d)(2)(C) of the Internal

Revenue Code for calendar year 2022.

The credit period for the nonconventional

source production credit under § 45K

ended on December 31, 2013, for facilities producing coke or coke gas (other

than from petroleum based products).

However, the reference price continues

to apply in determining the amount of

Bulletin No. 2023–26

the enhanced oil recovery credit under

§ 43, the marginal well production credit

for qualified crude oil production under

§ 45I, and the applicable percentage under

§ 613A to be used in determining percentage depletion in the case of oil and natural

gas produced from marginal properties.

SECTION 2. BACKGROUND

Section 45K(d)(2)(C) provides that the

term “reference price” means, with respect

to a calendar year, the Secretary’s estimate

of the annual average wellhead price per

barrel for all domestic crude oil the price

of which is not subject to regulation by the

United States.

Section 43(a) provides that, for purposes of § 38, the enhanced oil recovery

credit for any taxable year is an amount

equal to 15 percent of the taxpayer’s qualified enhanced oil recovery costs for such

taxable year.

Section 43(b)(1) provides that the

amount of enhanced oil recovery credit

for any taxable year shall be reduced by

an amount which bears the same ratio to

the amount of such credit (determined

without regard to this paragraph) as - (A)

the amount by which the reference price

for the calendar year preceding the calendar year in which the taxable year begins

exceeds $28, bears to (B) $6. Section

43(b)(2) provides that the term “reference

price” means, with respect to any calendar

year, the reference price determined for

such calendar year under § 45K(d)(2)(C).

Section 45I(a) provides that, for purposes of § 38, the marginal well production credit for any taxable year is an

amount equal to the product of the credit

amount and the qualified crude oil production and the qualified natural gas production which is attributable to the taxpayer.

Section 45I(b)(1) provides that for

crude oil production, the amount of the

marginal well production credit is $3 per

barrel of qualified crude oil production.

Section 45I(b)(2) provides that the $3

amount under § 45I(b)(1) shall be reduced

(but not below zero) by an amount which

bears the same ratio to such amount

(determined without regard to this paragraph) as – (i) the excess (if any) of the

applicable reference price over $15, bears

1087

to (ii) $3. The applicable reference price

for a taxable year is the reference price of

the calendar year preceding the calendar

year in which the taxable year begins.

Section 45I(b)(2)(C) provides that for

qualified crude oil production the term

“reference price” means, with respect

to any calendar year, the reference price

determined under § 45K(d)(2)(C).

Section 613A(c)(6)(A) provides, in

general, that the allowance for depletion

under § 611 shall be computed in accordance with § 613 with respect to - (i) so

much of the taxpayer’s average daily marginal production of domestic crude oil as

does not exceed the taxpayer’s depletable

oil quantity (determined without regard

to paragraph (3)(A)(ii)), and (ii) so much

of the taxpayer’s average daily marginal

production of domestic natural gas as

does not exceed the taxpayer’s depletable

natural gas quantity (determined without

regard to paragraph (3)(A)(ii)), and the

applicable percentage shall be deemed to

be specified in subsection (b) of § 613 for

purposes of subsection (a) of that section.

Section 613A(c)(6)(C) provides that

the term “applicable percentage” means

the percentage (not greater than 25 percent) equal to the sum of - (i) 15 percent,

plus (ii) 1 percentage point for each whole

dollar by which $20 exceeds the reference price for crude oil for the calendar

year preceding the calendar year in which

the taxable year begins. For purposes of

this paragraph, the term “reference price”

means, with respect to any calendar year,

the reference price determined for such

calendar year under § 45K(d)(2)(C).

SECTION 3. REFERENCE PRICE

The reference price under § 45K(d)(2)

(C) for calendar year 2022 is $93.97.

SECTION 4. DRAFTING

INFORMATION

The principal author of this notice

is Alan W. Tilley of the Office of

Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs

& Special Industries). For further information regarding this notice, contact Mr.

Tilley on (202) 317-6853 (not a toll-free

number).

June 26, 2023

Part IV

Notice of Proposed

Rulemaking

Malta Personal Retirement

Scheme Listed Transaction

REG-106228-22

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service

(IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking

and notice of public hearing.

SUMMARY: This document contains

proposed regulations that would identify

transactions that are the same as, or substantially similar to, certain Malta personal retirement scheme transactions as

listed transactions, a type of reportable

transaction. Material advisors and participants in these listed transactions would

be required to file disclosures with the

IRS and be subject to penalties for failure

to disclose. These proposed regulations

would affect participants in these transactions as well as material advisors. This

document also provides notice of a public

hearing on the proposed regulations.

DATES: Written or electronic comments

must be received by August 7, 2023. A

public hearing on this proposed regulation has been scheduled for September 21,

2023, at 10 a.m. EST. Requests to speak

and outlines of topics to be discussed at

the public hearing must be received by

August 7, 2023. If no outlines are received

by August 7, 2023, the public hearing will

be cancelled. Requests to attend the public hearing must be received by 5 p.m.

EST on September 19, 2023. The public

hearing will be made accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for special

assistance during the public hearing must

be received by 5 p.m. EST on September

18, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Commenters are strongly

encouraged to submit public comments

electronically via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov

June 26, 2023

(indicate IRS and REG-106228-22) by

following the online instructions for submitting comments. Requests for a public

hearing must be submitted as prescribed

in the “Comments and Requests for a

Public Hearing” section. Once submitted

to the Federal eRulemaking Portal, comments cannot be edited or withdrawn. The

Department of the Treasury (Treasury

Department) and the IRS will publish for

public availability any comments submitted to the IRS’s public docket. Send paper

submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG106228-22), room 5203, Internal Revenue

Service, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin

Station, Washington, DC 20044.

Comments and Public Hearing

Before these proposed amendments to

the regulations are adopted as final regulations, consideration will be given to comments regarding the notice of proposed

rulemaking that are submitted timely to

the IRS as prescribed in the preamble

under the ADDRESSES section. The

Treasury Department and the IRS request

comments on all aspects of the proposed

regulations. All comments will be made

available at https://www.regulations.gov.

Once submitted to the Federal eRulemaking Portal, comments cannot be edited or

withdrawn.

A public hearing has been scheduled

for September 21, 2023, beginning at 10

a.m. EST, in the Auditorium at the Internal

Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. Due to

building security procedures, visitors

must enter at the Constitution Avenue

entrance. In addition, all visitors must

present photo identification to enter the

building. Because of access restrictions,

visitors will not be admitted beyond

the immediate entrance area more than

30 minutes before the hearing starts.

Participants may alternatively attend the

public hearing by telephone.

The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3)

apply to the hearing. Persons who wish

to present oral comments at the hearing

must submit an outline of the topics to be

discussed and the time to be devoted to

each topic by August 7, 2023. A period of

1088

10 minutes will be allotted to each person

for making comments. An agenda showing the scheduling of the speakers will

be prepared after the deadline for receiving outlines has passed. Copies of the

agenda will be available free of charge

at the hearing. If no outline of the topics

to be discussed at the hearing is received

by August 7, 2023 the public hearing

will be cancelled. If the public hearing is

cancelled, a notice of cancellation of the

public hearing will be published in the

Federal Register.

Individuals who want to testify in

person at the public hearing must send

an email to publichearings@irs.gov to

have your name added to the building

access list. The subject line of the email

must contain the regulation number REG106228-22 and the language TESTIFY In

Person. For example, the subject line may

say: Request to TESTIFY In Person at

Hearing for REG-106228-22.

Individuals who want to testify by

telephone at the public hearing must send

an email to publichearings@irs.gov to

receive the telephone number and access

code for the hearing. The subject line

of the email must contain the regulation

number REG-106228-22 and the language

TESTIFY Telephonically. For example, the subject line may say: Request to

TESTIFY Telephonically at Hearing for

REG-106228-22.

Individuals who want to attend the

public hearing in person without testifying must also send an email to publichearings@irs.gov to have your name added to

the building access list. The subject line

of the email must contain the regulation

number REG-106228-22 and the language

ATTEND In Person. For example, the

subject line may say: Request to ATTEND

Hearing In Person for REG-106228-22.

Requests to attend the public hearing must

be received by 5 p.m. EST on September

19, 2023.

Individuals who want to attend the public hearing by telephone without testifying

must also send an email to publichearings@irs.gov to receive the telephone

number and access code for the hearing.

The subject line of the email must contain

the regulation number REG-106228-22

Bulletin No. 2023–26

and the language ATTEND Hearing

Telephonically. For example, the subject line may say: Request to ATTEND

Hearing Telephonically for REG-10622822. Requests to attend the public hearing must be received by 5 p.m. EST on

September 19, 2023.

Hearings will be made accessible to

people with disabilities. To request special assistance during a hearing please

contact the Publications and Regulations

Branch of the Office of Associate Chief

Counsel (Procedure and Administration)

by sending an email to publichearings@

irs.gov (preferred) or by telephone at

(202) 317-6901 (not a toll-free number)

by September 18, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT: Concerning the proposed

regulations, W. Shawver Adams at (202)

317-5132; concerning submissions of

comments or requests for a public hearing,

Vivian Hayes at (202) 317-6901 (not tollfree numbers) or by email at publichearings@irs.gov (preferred).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

This document contains proposed

additions to 26 CFR part 1 (Income Tax

Regulations) under section 6011 of the

Internal Revenue Code (Code). The additions identify certain transactions that are

“listed transactions” for the purposes of

section 6011. This regulation would also

affect reporting requirements under section 6111 and list maintenance requirements under section 6112.

I. Overview of the Reportable

Transaction Regime

Section 6011(a) generally provides

that, when required by regulations prescribed by the Secretary, “any person made

liable for any tax imposed by this title or

with respect to the collection thereof, shall

make a return or statement according to

the forms and regulations prescribed by

the Secretary. Every person required to

make a return or statement shall include

therein the information required by such

forms or regulations.”

On February 28, 2000, the Treasury

Department and the IRS issued a series of

Bulletin No. 2023–26

temporary regulations (TD 8877; TD 8876;

TD 8875) and cross-referencing notices

of proposed rulemaking (REG-10373500; REG-110311-00; REG-103736-00)

under sections 6011, 6111, and 6112. The

temporary regulations and cross-referencing notices of proposed rulemaking were

published in the Federal Register (65 FR

11205, 65 FR 11269; 65 FR 11215, 65

FR 11272; 65 FR 11211, 65 FR 11271)

on March 2, 2000 (2000 Temporary

Regulations). The 2000 Temporary

Regulations were modified several times

before March 4, 2003, the date on which

the Treasury Department and the IRS,

after providing notice and opportunity

for public comment and considering the

comments received, published final regulations (TD 9046) in the Federal Register

(68 FR 10161) under sections 6011, 6111,

and 6112 (2003 Final Regulations). The

2000 Temporary Regulations and 2003

Final Regulations consistently provided

that reportable transactions include listed

transactions and that a listed transaction is

a transaction that is the same as or substantially similar to one of the types of transactions that the IRS has determined to be

a tax avoidance transaction and identified

by notice, regulation, or other form of

published guidance as a listed transaction.

As part of the American Jobs Creation

Act of 2004 (AJCA), Public Law 108357, 118 Stat. 1418 (October 22, 2004),

Congress added sections 6707A, 6662A,

and 6501(c)(10) to the Code and revised

sections 6111, 6112, 6707, and 6708 of the

Code. See sections 811-812 and 814-817

of the ACJA. The AJCA’s legislative history explains that Congress incorporated

in the statute the method that the Treasury

Department and the IRS had been using to

identify reportable transactions, and provided incentives, via penalties, to encourage taxpayer compliance with the new

disclosure reporting obligations. As the

Committee on Ways and Means explained

in its report accompanying H.R. 4520,

which became the AJCA:

 he Committee believes that the best

T

way to combat tax shelters is to be aware

of them. The Treasury Department,

using the tools available, issued regulations requiring disclosure of certain

transactions and requiring organizers and promoters of tax-engineered

1089

transactions to maintain customer

lists and make these lists available to

the IRS. Nevertheless, the Committee

believes that additional legislation

is needed to provide the Treasury

Department with additional tools to

assist its efforts to curtail abusive

transactions. Moreover, the Committee

believes that a penalty for failing to

make the required disclosures, when

the imposition of such penalty is not

dependent on the tax treatment of the

underlying transaction ultimately being

sustained, will provide an additional

incentive for taxpayers to satisfy their

reporting obligations under the new

disclosure provisions.

House Report 108-548(I), 108th Cong.,

2nd Sess. 2004, 2004 WL 1380512, at 261

(June 16, 2004) (House Report).

In Footnote 232 of the House Report,

the Committee on Ways and Means notes

that the statutory definitions of “reportable

transaction” and “listed transaction” were

intended to incorporate the pre-AJCA regulatory definitions, while providing the

Secretary with leeway to make changes to

those definitions:

The provision states that, except as

provided in regulations, a listed transaction means a reportable transaction,

which is the same as, or substantially

similar to, a transaction specifically

identified by the Secretary as a tax

avoidance transaction for purposes of

section 6011. For this purpose, it is

expected that the definition of “substantially similar” will be the definition

used in Treas. Reg. sec. 1.6011–4(c)(4).

However, the Secretary may modify

this definition (as well as the definitions

of “listed transaction” and “reportable

transactions”) as appropriate.

Id. at 261 n.232.

Section 6707A(c)(1) defines a “reportable transaction” as “any transaction with

respect to which information is required

to be included with a return or statement

because, as determined under regulations

prescribed under section 6011, such transaction is of a type which the Secretary

determines as having a potential for tax

avoidance or evasion.” A “listed transaction” is defined by section 6707A(c)

June 26, 2023

(2) as “a reportable transaction which is

the same as, or substantially similar to, a

transaction specifically identified by the

Secretary as a tax avoidance transaction

for the purposes of section 6011.”

Section 6111(a), as revised by the

AJCA, provides that each material advisor with respect to any reportable transaction shall make a return setting forth:

(1) information identifying and describing

the transaction, (2) information describing

any potential tax benefits expected to result

from the transaction, and (3) such other

information as the Secretary may prescribe. Such return must be filed not later

than the date specified by the Secretary.

Section 6111(b)(2) provides that a reportable transaction has the meaning given to

such term by section 6707A(c).

Section 6112(a), as revised by the

AJCA, provides that each material advisor with respect to any reportable transaction (as defined in section 6707A(c)) must

(whether or not required to file a return

under section 6111 with respect to such

transaction) maintain a list (1) identifying

each person with respect to whom such

advisor acted as a material advisor and (2)

containing such other information as the

Secretary may by regulations require.

On August 3, 2007, the Treasury

Department and the IRS published final

regulations in the Federal Register (72

FR 43146, 72 FR 43157, 72 FR 43154)

under sections 6011, 6111, and 6112,

modifying the rules relating to the disclosure of reportable transactions by participants in reportable transactions under

section 6011, the disclosure of reportable

transactions by material advisors under

section 6111, and the list maintenance

requirements of material advisors with

respect to reportable transactions under

section 6112 in response to the changes in

the AJCA.

II. Disclosure of Reportable Transactions

by Participants and Penalties for Failure

to Disclose

Section 1.6011-4(a) provides that

every taxpayer that has participated in a

reportable transaction within the meaning of §1.6011-4(b) and who is required

to file a tax return must file a disclosure

statement within the time prescribed in

§ 1.6011-4(e).

June 26, 2023

Section 1.6011-4(d) and (e) provide

that the disclosure statement - Form

8886, Reportable Transaction Disclosure

Statement (or successor form) - must be

attached to the taxpayer’s tax return for

each taxable year for which a taxpayer

participates in a reportable transaction.

A copy of the disclosure statement must

be sent to the IRS’s Office of Tax Shelter

Analysis (OTSA) at the same time that

any disclosure statement is first filed by

the taxpayer pertaining to a particular

reportable transaction.

Reportable transactions include listed

transactions, confidential transactions,

transactions with contractual protection, loss transactions, and transactions

of interest. See §1.6011-4(b)(2) through

(6). Consistent with the definitions previously provided in the 2000 Temporary

Regulations and later in the 2003 Final

Regulations as promulgated in 2007,

§1.6011-4(b)(2) continues to define a

listed transaction as a transaction that

is the same as or substantially similar to

one of the types of transactions that the

IRS has determined to be a tax avoidance

transaction and identified by notice, regulation, or other form of published guidance as a listed transaction.

Section 1.6011-4(c)(4) provides that a

transaction is “substantially similar” if it

is expected to obtain the same or similar

types of tax consequences and is either

factually similar or based on the same or

similar tax strategy. Receipt of an opinion regarding the tax consequences of the

transaction is not relevant to the determination of whether the transaction is the

same as or substantially similar to another

transaction. Further, the term substantially

similar must be broadly construed in favor

of disclosure. For example, a transaction

may be substantially similar to a listed

transaction even though it may involve

different entities or use different Code

provisions.

Section 1.6011-4(c)(3)(i)(A) provides that a taxpayer has participated in

a listed transaction if the taxpayer’s tax

return reflects tax consequences (including an exclusion from gross income) or

a tax strategy described in the published

guidance that lists the transaction under

§1.6011-4(b)(2). A taxpayer also has participated in a listed transaction if the taxpayer knows or has reason to know that the

1090

taxpayer’s tax benefits are derived directly

or indirectly from tax consequences or a

tax strategy described in published guidance that lists a transaction under §1.60114(b)(2). Published guidance may identify

other types or classes of persons that will

be treated as participants in a listed transaction. Published guidance may also identify types or classes of persons that will

not be treated as participants in a listed

transaction.

Section 1.6011-4(e)(2)(i) provides that

if a transaction becomes a listed transaction after the filing of a taxpayer’s tax

return reflecting the taxpayer’s participation in the listed transaction and before the

end of the period of limitations for assessment for any taxable year in which the

taxpayer participated in the listed transaction, then a disclosure statement must be

filed with OTSA within 90 calendar days

after the date on which the transaction

becomes a listed transaction. This requirement extends to an amended return and

exists regardless of whether the taxpayer

participated in the transaction in the year

the transaction became a listed transaction.

The Commissioner may also determine the

time for disclosure of listed transactions

in the published guidance identifying the

transaction.

Participants required to disclose these

transactions under §1.6011-4 who fail to

do so are subject to penalties under section 6707A. Section 6707A(b) provides

that the amount of the penalty is 75 percent of the decrease in tax shown on the

return as a result of the reportable transaction (or which would have resulted from

such transaction if such transaction were

respected for Federal tax purposes), subject to minimum and maximum penalty

amounts. The minimum penalty amount

is $5,000 in the case of a natural person

and $10,000 in any other case. For a listed

transaction, the maximum penalty amount

is $100,000 in the case of a natural person

and $200,000 in any other case.

Additional penalties may also apply.

In general, section 6662A imposes a 20

percent accuracy-related penalty on any

understatement (as defined in section

6662A(b)(1)) attributable to an adequately

disclosed reportable transaction. If the

taxpayer has a requirement to disclose

participation in the reportable transaction but does not adequately disclose the

Bulletin No. 2023–26

transaction in accordance with the regulations under section 6011, the taxpayer is

subject to an increased penalty rate equal

to 30 percent of the understatement. See

section 6662A(c). Section 6662A(b)(2)

provides that section 6662A applies to

any item which is attributable to any listed

transaction and any reportable transaction

(other than a listed transaction) if a significant purpose of such transaction is the

avoidance or evasion of Federal income

tax.

Participants required to disclose listed

transactions who fail to do so are also subject to an extended period of limitations

under section 6501(c)(10). That section

provides that the time for assessment of

any tax with respect to the transaction

shall not expire before the date that is one

year after the earlier of the date the participant discloses the transaction or the date a

material advisor discloses the participation

pursuant to a written request under section

6112(b)(1)(A).

III. Disclosure of Reportable

Transactions by Material Advisors and

Penalties for Failure to Disclose

Section 301.6111-3(a) of the Procedure

and Administration Regulations provides

that each material advisor with respect

to any reportable transaction, as defined

in §1.6011-4(b), must file a return as

described in §301.6111-3(d) by the date

described in §301.6111-3(e).

Section 301.6111-3(b)(1) provides that

a person is a material advisor with respect

to a transaction if the person provides any

material aid, assistance, or advice with

respect to organizing, managing, promoting, selling, implementing, insuring, or

carrying out any reportable transaction,

and directly or indirectly derives gross

income in excess of the threshold amount

as defined in §301.6111-3(b)(3) for the

material aid, assistance, or advice. Under

§301.6111-3(b)(2)(i) and (ii), a person

provides material aid, assistance, or advice

if the person provides a tax statement,

which is any statement (including another

person’s statement), oral or written, that

relates to a tax aspect of a transaction that

causes the transaction to be a reportable

transaction as defined in §1.6011-4(b)(2)

through (7).

Material advisors must disclose transactions on Form 8918, Material Advisor

Disclosure Statement, (or successor form)

as provided in §301.6111-3(d) and (e).

Section 301.6111-3(e) provides that the

material advisor’s disclosure statement for

a reportable transaction must be filed with

the OTSA by the last day of the month

that follows the end of the calendar quarter in which the advisor becomes a material advisor with respect to a reportable

transaction or in which the circumstances

necessitating an amended disclosure statement occur. The disclosure statement must

be sent to the OTSA at the address provided in the instructions for Form 8918 (or

successor form).

Section 301.6111-3(d)(2) provides

that the IRS will issue to a material advisor a reportable transaction number with

respect to the disclosed reportable transaction. Receipt of a reportable transaction

number does not indicate that the disclosure statement is complete, nor does

it indicate that the transaction has been

reviewed, examined, or approved by the

IRS. Material advisors must provide the

reportable transaction number to all taxpayers and material advisors for whom the

material advisor acts as a material advisor

as defined in §301.6111-3(b). The reportable transaction number must be provided

at the time the transaction is entered into,

or, if the transaction is entered into prior to

the material advisor receiving the reportable transaction number, within 60 calendar days from the date the reportable

transaction number is mailed to the material advisor.

Additionally, material advisors must

prepare and maintain lists identifying each

person with respect to whom the advisor

acted as a material advisor with respect

to the reportable transaction in accordance with §301.6112-1(b) and furnish

such lists to the IRS in accordance with

§301.6112-1(e).

Section 6707(a) provides that a material advisor who fails to file a timely disclosure, or files an incomplete or false

disclosure statement, is subject to a

penalty. Pursuant to section 6707(b)(2),

for listed transactions, the penalty is the

greater of (A) $200,000 or (B) 50 percent of the gross income derived by such

person with respect to aid, assistance, or

advice which is provided with respect to

the listed transaction before the date the

return is filed under section 6111.

A material advisor may also be subject

to a penalty under section 6708 for failing

to maintain a list under section 6112(a)

and failing to make the list available upon

written request to the Secretary in accordance with section 6112(b) within 20 business days after the date of such request.

Section 6708(a) provides that the penalty

is $10,000 per day for each day of the failure after the 20th day. However, no penalty

will be imposed with respect to the failure

on any day if such failure is due to reasonable cause.

IV. Malta Personal Retirement Schemes

Under U.S. Federal income tax law,

individual savings arrangements are not

entitled to tax-favored treatment available

for pension or retirement arrangements

if they do not meet the requirements for

an individual retirement account (IRA)

described in section 408 or a Roth IRA

described in section 408A. The tax-favored treatment for an IRA or Roth IRA

includes the deductibility (in many cases)

of contributions to an IRA, tax deferral on

the earnings of the IRA or Roth IRA, and

exclusion from income for qualified distributions from a Roth IRA. IRAs and Roth

IRAs are subject to certain requirements,

such as a requirement that an individual’s

contributions, other than certain rollovers,

are restricted to cash and limited by reference to an individual’s earned income

(including, in the case of spousal IRAs,

a spouse’s earned income). In addition,

a distribution from an IRA (or a distribution from a Roth IRA that is not a qualified distribution) is generally subject to a

10% additional tax if paid before the IRA

owner attains age 59½.

Malta’s personal retirement schemes

were enacted as part of the Retirement

Pensions Act of 2011 and implemented

by regulations in 2015.1 They are tax-favored savings arrangements in Malta that

1

Act No. XVI of 2011, as amended by Act No. XX of 2013, and amended by Act No. XXVI of 2018; Ch. 514 (Retirement Pensions Act). Pension Rules for Personal Retirement Schemes

Issued in Terms of the Retirement Pensions Act, 2011, were issued on January 7, 2015, and effective January 1, 2015.

Bulletin No. 2023–26

1091

June 26, 2023

allow individuals or their employers to

contribute assets to a trust or other investment vehicle for such individuals’ benefit.

In contrast to U.S. tax-favored individual

savings arrangements, there is no requirement that contributions be limited by

reference to income earned from employment or self-employment activities, no

limitation on contribution amounts, and

no restriction on the types of assets (such

as securities) that may be contributed.

Distributions, which may begin when an

individual member is 50 but must start

no later than age 75, may be exempt from

Maltese income tax if the individual elects

to receive initial and additional cash lump

sum distributions.

Absent treaty relief, U.S. citizens and

U.S. resident aliens who establish a foreign individual retirement trust or other

individual retirement arrangement are

generally required to take into account

the arrangement’s income on a current

basis, even if there has been no distribution from the arrangement. See, e.g., section 671. Under section 894(a), the Code

applies to a taxpayer with due regard to

any treaty obligations of the United States.

Pursuant to the saving clause in Article 1,

paragraph 4, of the Convention Between

the Government of the United States of

America and the Government of Malta for

the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the

Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect

to Taxes on Income, signed at Valetta,

August 8, 2008 (“Treaty”), the United

States retains its right to tax the income

of its citizens and residents (as determined

under Article 4 (Resident) of the Treaty)

as if there were no Treaty between the

United States and Malta. Notwithstanding

the saving clause, U.S. citizens and U.S.

resident aliens may claim an exemption

from U.S. income tax in accordance with

the Treaty if they qualify for an exception

to the saving clause provided under paragraph 5 of Article 1.

Articles 17(1)(b) and 18 of the Treaty,

are both listed as exceptions to the saving

clause. These provisions may permit U.S.

citizens and U.S. resident aliens an exemption from U.S. income tax on (1) “pensions

and other similar remuneration” arising in

Malta to the extent such pensions or remuneration would be exempt from tax under

Maltese law if the beneficial owner were

a resident of Malta (Article 17(1)(b)), and

June 26, 2023

(2) income earned by a “pension fund”

established in Malta until such income

is distributed (Article 18). As explained

in Treasury’s Technical Explanation to

the Treaty, Article 17 applies generally

to “distributions from pensions and other

similar remuneration beneficially owned

by a resident of a Contracting State in

consideration of past employment. . .”,

whereas Article 18 applies to income of

a “pension fund established in the other

Contracting State . . . .” Paragraph (1)(k)

of Article 3 of the Treaty defines the term

“pension fund” for purposes of the Treaty.

In the case of Malta, a pension fund is a

licensed fund or scheme subject to tax

only on income derived from immovable

property situated in Malta, and as relevant

here, operated principally to “administer

or provide pension or retirement benefits

. . . .”

On December 27, 2021, the IRS published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin a

Competent Authority Arrangement (the

“CAA”) between the United States and

Malta. I.R.B. 2021-52, Ann. 2021-19. In

the CAA, the U.S. and Maltese competent

authorities agreed that individual retirement arrangements established under

Malta’s Retirement Pensions Act of 2011

are not considered “pension funds” for purpose of relevant provisions of the Treaty.

The CAA also confirmed that distributions

from these types of arrangements are not

“pensions or other similar remuneration”

in consideration of past employment for

purposes of paragraph 1(b) of Article 17.

The CAA “reflects the original intent [of

the United States and Malta] regarding the

definition of ‘pension fund’ for purposes

of the Treaty.”

In addition to the income tax consequences associated with a U.S. taxpayer’s

transactions with or interest in a Malta

personal retirement scheme, information reporting requirements also apply.

Section 6048 generally requires annual

information reporting of a U.S. person’s

transfers of money or other property to,

ownership of, and distributions from, foreign trusts. Section 6677 imposes penalties on a U.S. person for failing to comply

with section 6048. See also Notice 97-34,

1997-1 C.B. 422. Under section 6048(d)

(4), the Secretary may suspend or modify any requirement under section 6048

if the United States has no significant tax

1092

interest in obtaining the required information. The Treasury Department and

the IRS have previously issued guidance

providing that reporting is not required

under section 6048(a), (b), and (c) for certain U.S. citizen and resident individuals

with respect to their transactions with, and

ownership of, certain tax-favored foreign

retirement trusts and certain tax-favored

foreign nonretirement savings trusts, as

described in Revenue Procedure 202017, 2020-12 I.R.B. 539. Malta personal

retirement schemes are not eligible for

this relief from section 6048 reporting

because contributions to these arrangements are not limited to income earned

from the performance of services, subject to a certain annual or lifetime limit,

or subject to a limit based on a percentage of the participant’s earned income.

See Section 5.03 of Rev. Proc. 2020-17.

Section 6048 information reporting is provided on Form 3520, Annual Return To

Report Transactions With Foreign Trusts

and Receipt of Certain Foreign Gifts, and

Form 3520-A, Annual Information Return

of Foreign Trust With a U.S. Owner

(Under section 6048(b)).

Section 6038D may also apply to a

U.S. person’s interest in a Malta personal

retirement scheme. Under section 6038D,

a specified person, which includes a U.S.

citizen or resident alien, must report any

interest in a specified foreign financial

asset provided that the aggregate value of

all such assets exceeds certain thresholds.

See §1.6038D-2(a). Section 6038D(d)

imposes a penalty for failing to comply.

Section 6038D information reporting is

provided on Form 8938, Statement of

Specified Foreign Financial Assets. A

specified person who is required to report

information under section 6038D on Form

8938 may also be required to report similar identifying information under section

6048 on Form 3520 or Form 3520-A.

V. Tax Avoidance Transactions Using

Malta Personal Retirement Schemes

The Treasury Department and the IRS

are aware of transactions in which a U.S.

citizen or a U.S. resident alien misconstrues the pension provisions of the Treaty

to claim an exemption from U.S. income

tax on earnings in and distributions from

personal retirement schemes established

Bulletin No. 2023–26

under the laws of Malta. E.g., IR-2022113. Typically, the transaction is intended

to permanently avoid U.S. tax on (1) the

built-in-gain of appreciated property

transferred to personal retirement schemes

established in Malta, (2) income earned by

and accumulated in such schemes, and/or

(3) distributions from such schemes. The

U.S. individuals who participate in these

transactions generally lack any connection to Malta other than their participation

in these arrangements. These individuals also may fail to comply with their

U.S. information reporting requirements,

including under section 6048.

In this transaction, the taxpayer

(Taxpayer A), a U.S. citizen or a U.S. resident alien, establishes a personal retirement scheme under Malta’s Retirement

Pension Act of 2011. In Year 1, Taxpayer

A transfers cash, appreciated property

(annuities, securities, digital assets, partnership interests, etc.), or a combination

thereof, to the scheme without recognizing

gain on the transfer under section 684(b).

In Year 2 or later, Taxpayer A takes the

position on a U.S. income tax return that

the income earned by the scheme (including gain on the sale or other disposition of

appreciated property initially transferred

to the scheme) is exempt from U.S. tax

under Articles 18 and 1(5)(a) of the Treaty

because the scheme is a “pension fund”

for purposes of the Treaty. In Year 3 or

later, Taxpayer A receives a distribution

from the scheme and takes the position on

a U.S. income tax return that such distributions are exempt from U.S. tax by reason of Articles 17(1)(b) and 1(5)(a) of the

Treaty. Additionally, Taxpayer A may not

comply with U.S. information reporting

requirements related to these transactions,

including under section 6048.

The taxpayer’s positions in these transactions are incorrect. First, the Treaty

benefits claimed with respect to personal

retirement schemes established in Malta

are not available because these schemes

are not “pension funds,” and their distributions are not “pensions or other similar remuneration,” as explained in the

CAA. Second, under Article 3(2) of the

Treaty, the undefined terms “pension” and

2

“retirement” are interpreted according to

the tax law of the United States, which is

the country that is applying the Treaty. 2

Under U.S. law applicable to individual

retirement arrangements, Malta personal

retirement schemes are neither “pensions”

nor do they provide “retirement benefits” for purposes of the Treaty. Maltese

law does not condition the tax benefits it

provides for these arrangements upon reasonably analogous requirements of U.S.

law. Those requirements include that an

individual’s contributions to an individual

retirement arrangement (other than qualified rollovers from a pension or retirement

arrangement that is tax-favored under

the same country’s laws) must be made

in cash and must be based on income

earned from employment or self-employment activities. See sections 219, 408, and

408A. Third, in appropriate fact patterns,

the transaction viewed as a whole may be

disregarded under relevant judicial doctrines, including the step-transaction doctrine, the substance-over-form doctrine,

and the assignment of income doctrine, in

order to give effect to the general purpose

of the Treaty to mitigate double taxation

but not improperly create instances of

non-taxation, especially in cases in which

the person establishing the retirement

arrangement has no other connection to

the treaty jurisdiction.

VI. Purpose of Proposed Regulation

On March 3, 2022, the Sixth Circuit

issued an order in Mann Construction v.

United States, 27 F.4th 1138, 1147 (6th

Cir. 2022), holding that Notice 2007-83,

2007-2 C.B. 960, which identified certain

trust arrangements claiming to be welfare

benefit funds and involving cash value life

insurance policies as listed transactions,

violated the Administrative Procedure

Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 551-559 because the

notice was issued without following the

notice-and-comment procedures required

by section 553 of the APA. The Sixth

Circuit concluded that Congress did not

clearly express an intent to override the

notice-and-comment procedures required

by section 553 of the APA when it enacted

the AJCA. Id. at 1148. The Sixth Circuit

reversed the decision of the district court,

which held that Congress had authorized

the IRS to identify listed transactions

without notice and comment. See Mann

Construction, Inc. v. United States, 539

F.Supp.3d 745, 763 (E.D. Mich. 2021).

Relying on the Sixth Circuit’s analysis in Mann Construction, three district

courts and the Tax Court have concluded

that IRS notices identifying listed transactions were improperly issued because

they were issued without following the

APA’s notice and comment procedures.

See Green Rock, LLC v. IRS, 2023 WL

1478444 (N.D. AL., February 2, 2023)

(Notice 2017-10); GBX Associates, LLC,

v. United States, 1:22cv401 (N.D. Ohio,

Nov. 14, 2022) (same); Green Valley

Investors, LLC, et al. v. Commissioner,

159 T.C. No. 5 (Nov. 9, 2022) (same);

see also CIC Services, LLC v. IRS, 2022

WL 985619 (E.D. Tenn. March 21, 2022),

as modified by 2022 WL 2078036 (E.D.

Tenn. June 2, 2022) (Notice 2016-66,

identifying a transaction of interest).

The Treasury Department and the IRS

disagree with the Sixth Circuit’s decision

in Mann Construction and the subsequent

decisions that have applied that reasoning to find other IRS notices invalid and

are continuing to defend the validity of

notices identifying transactions as listed

transactions in circuits other than the

Sixth Circuit. At the same time, however,

to avoid any confusion and ensure consistent enforcement of the tax laws throughout the nation, the Treasury Department

and the IRS are issuing these proposed

regulations to identify certain transactions involving Malta pension plans as

listed transactions for purposes of all relevant provisions of the Code and Treasury

Regulations, including section 6707A and

§1.6011-4(b)(2).

The Treasury Department and the IRS

believe that transactions involving a Malta

personal retirement scheme described

in the proposed regulations, and substantially similar transactions involving

a retirement arrangement established in

Malta, unless specifically excepted, are

tax avoidance transactions and should be

Treasury’s Technical Explanation to Article 3(2) of the Treaty states:

Paragraph 2 provides that in the application of the Convention, any term used but not defined in the Convention will have the meaning that it has under the law of the Contracting State

whose tax is being applied, unless the context requires otherwise, or the competent authorities have agreed on a different meaning pursuant to Article 25 (Mutual Agreement Procedure).



Bulletin No. 2023–26

1093

June 26, 2023

identified as listed transactions for purposes of §1.6011-4 and sections 6111 and

6112. Under the proposed regulations,

participants involved in such transactions

and their material advisors would need to

comply with the information reporting and

collection requirements under §1.6011-4

and sections 6111 and 6112. Failure to do

so could result in penalties as described in

sections II and III of the Background section of this preamble.

Explanation of Provisions

I. Malta Personal Retirement Scheme

Transaction

Proposed §1.6011-12(a) provides that,

except as provided in proposed §1.601112(b)(2), a transaction that is the same

as, or substantially similar to, a Malta

personal retirement scheme transaction

(described in proposed §1.6011-12(b)

(1)) is a listed transaction for purposes of

§1.6011-4 and sections 6111 and 6112. A

transaction is a Malta personal retirement

scheme transaction as described in proposed §1.6011-12(b)(1) if a U.S. citizen

or a U.S. resident alien directly or indirectly (1) transfers (within the meaning of

§1.679-3 or §1.684-2) cash or other property to, or receives a distribution from, a

personal retirement scheme established

under Malta’s Retirement Pension Act

of 2011 (a “Malta personal retirement

scheme”), and (2) takes the position on

a U.S. Federal income tax return that (a)

income earned or gain realized by the

Malta personal retirement scheme is not

includible in income on a current basis

for U.S. Federal income tax purposes by

reason of the Treaty, or (b) a distribution

from a Malta personal retirement scheme

attributable to earnings or gains of the

scheme that have not been included in

income for U.S. Federal income tax purposes is exempt from U.S. taxation by reason of the Treaty. Proposed §1.6011-12(b)

(1). Indirect transfers include transfers to a

Malta personal retirement scheme by any

person (intermediary) to whom a U.S. person transfers property if such transfer is

made pursuant to a plan one of the principal purposes of which is the avoidance of

United States tax. See, e.g., §1.679-3(c).

For example, assume in Year 1

Taxpayer A, a U.S. citizen or a U.S.

June 26, 2023

resident alien directly or indirectly transfers cash and appreciated property to a

Malta personal retirement scheme. In Year

2 the Malta personal retirement scheme

sells Taxpayer A’s contributed property

at a gain. On a U.S. income tax return

for Year 2, Taxpayer A does not include

the gain realized by the scheme, because,

according to Taxpayer A, such gain is

exempt from U.S. taxation under Articles

18 and 1(5)(a) of the Treaty. Taxpayer A

has engaged in a Malta personal retirement scheme transaction as described in

proposed §1.6011-12(b)(1). Unless the

exception described in proposed §1.601112(b)(2) applies, the transaction is a listed

transaction for purposes of §1.6011-4 and

sections 6111 and 6112. Taxpayer A and

any material advisor with respect to the

listed transaction are therefore subject

to the information reporting and collection of information requirements under

§1.6011-4 and sections 6111 and 6112,

respectively, as described in sections I

through III of the Background section

of this preamble. Taxpayer A must also

comply with U.S. information reporting requirements including, for example,

requirements under section 6048.

Under §1.6011-4(c)(3)(i)(E), Taxpayer

A is a participant in a listed transaction for

each year in which Taxpayer A’s tax return

reflects tax consequences or a tax strategy

of a Malta personal retirement scheme

transaction as described in proposed

§1.6011-12(b)(1). Thus, continuing with

the example in the preceding paragraph,

if Taxpayer A receives a distribution from

the Malta personal retirement scheme in

Year 3, but does not include the distribution in income under Articles 17(1)(b) and

1(5)(a) of the Treaty, Taxpayer A will have

participated in a Malta personal retirement

scheme transaction as described in proposed §1.6011-12(b)(1) in each of Year 2

and Year 3.

A transaction is not substantially similar to a Malta personal retirement scheme

transaction unless it involves the Treaty

and a retirement arrangement established

in Malta. The Treasury Department and

the IRS are aware that taxpayers may

attempt to use transactions similar to the

Malta personal retirement scheme transaction in other jurisdictions to achieve a similar tax avoidance outcome. The Treasury

Department and the IRS are therefore

1094

considering whether transactions similar

to the Malta personal retirement scheme

transaction replicated in other jurisdictions should also be identified as listed

transactions and request comments on this

matter.

II. Exception

The Treasury Department and the IRS

are aware that the United Kingdom allows

tax-deferred transfers from its pension or

retirement schemes to certain “qualified

recognised overseas pension schemes”

(or QROPS), including Malta personal retirement schemes. The Treasury

Department and the IRS believe that certain U.S. individuals who may have transferred their foreign pension or retirement

arrangements to Malta personal retirement schemes in accordance with foreign

law and claimed an exemption from U.S.

income tax for earnings in or distributions from such schemes on U.S. Federal

income tax returns filed before the date

these proposed regulations are published

in the Federal Register should not be

treated as participating in a listed transaction described in proposed §1.6011-12(b)

(1) provided certain requirements are met.

Accordingly, proposed §1.6011-12(b)(2)

provides that if a U.S. citizen or resident

alien described in proposed §1.601112(b)(1)(i) takes a position described in

proposed §1.6011-12(b)(1)(ii) on a U.S.

Federal income tax return filed before June

6, 2023, such U.S. citizen or U.S. resident

alien will not be treated as participating in

a listed transaction for the taxable year to

which the U.S. Federal income tax return

relates provided that (1) such U.S. citizen or U.S. resident alien (the transferor)

established the Malta personal retirement

scheme with a transfer (or rollover) of a

pension or other retirement arrangement

established in a country other than Malta

or the United States (for example, a pension scheme established in the United

Kingdom), and in compliance with the

tax laws of such country, (2) the transferor was, when such pension or retirement arrangement was established and

such rollover occurred, a resident of the

other country under that country’s tax law,

including under Article 4 (Residency) of

such country’s income tax treaty with the

United States, if applicable (for example,

Bulletin No. 2023–26

a tax resident of the United Kingdom),

and (3) the transferor’s contributions to

such pension or retirement arrangement

consisted solely of cash in an amount that

bears a relationship to the transferor’s

income earned from the performance of

personal services. This exception does

not apply to a U.S. citizen or U.S. resident alien who takes a position described

in proposed §1.6011-12(b)(1)(ii) on a

U.S. Federal income tax return filed on

or after June 6, 2023, when U.S. citizens

or U.S. resident aliens who own foreign

pension or retirement arrangements and

their material advisors are on notice that

the Treasury Department and the IRS

have proposed identifying Malta personal

retirement scheme transactions as listed

transactions for purposes of §1.6011-4(b)

(2) and sections 6111 and 6112.

For example, assume Taxpayer B, a

U.S. citizen, was a resident of Country Y

when Taxpayer B established a Country Y

pension plan in compliance with Country

Y’s laws. Taxpayer B made cash contributions from wages to the Country Y pension plan. Taxpayer B, while a U.S. citizen

and resident of Country Y, transferred the

Country Y pension plan to a Malta personal

retirement scheme in accordance with

Country Y tax law. In Year 1, Taxpayer

B’s Malta personal retirement scheme

earned income. On Taxpayer B’s Year 1

U.S. Federal income tax return, which is

filed before June 6, 2023, Taxpayer B took

a position described in proposed §1.601112(b)(1)(ii). Under proposed §1.601112(b)(2), Taxpayer B would not be treated

as participating in a listed transaction with

respect to such year.

A U.S. citizen or U.S. resident alien

who is described in proposed §1.601112(b)(2), however, may be subject to

U.S. income tax as a result of the transfer

from a pension or retirement arrangement

established in a country other than Malta

to a Malta personal retirement scheme, as

well as U.S. information reporting requirements under, for example, section 6048(a)

and (c). See IRS INFO 2011-0096 (Dec.

30, 2011). U.S. citizens and U.S. residents

who are described in proposed §1.601112(b)(2) are subject to U.S. income tax on

income earned and gain realized by their

Malta personal retirement schemes, as

described in section IV of the Background

section of this preamble.

Bulletin No. 2023–26

III. Effect of Transaction Becoming a

Listed Transaction

Participants required to disclose these

transactions under §1.6011-4 who fail to

do so would be subject to penalties under

section 6707A. Participants required

to disclose these transactions under

§1.6011-4 who fail to do so would also

be subject to an extended period of limitations under section 6501(c)(10). Material

advisors required to disclose these transactions under section 6111 who fail to do

so would be subject to the penalty under

section 6707. Material advisors required

to maintain lists of investors under section 6112 who fail to do so (or who fail

to provide such lists when requested by

the IRS) would be subject to the penalty

under section 6708(a). In addition, the

IRS may impose other penalties on persons involved in these transactions or substantially similar transactions, including

accuracy-related penalties under section

6662 or section 6662A, the section 6694

penalty for understatements of a taxpayer’s liability by a tax return preparer, and

the section 6677 penalty for the failure to

timely report certain transactions with,

and ownership of, foreign trusts.

Taxpayers who have filed a tax

return (including an amended return

(or Administrative Adjustment Request

(AAR) for certain partnerships)) reflecting their participation in these transactions before [DATE THE FINAL

REGULATIONS ARE PUBLISHED

IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER] (the

finalization date) and who have not otherwise finalized a settlement agreement

with the IRS with respect to the transaction must disclose the transactions as

provided in §1.6011-4(d) and (e) provided that the period of limitations for

assessment of tax, including any applicable extensions, for any taxable year in

which the taxpayer participated in the

transaction has not ended on or before the

finalization date. Proposed §1.6011-12(b)

(3); see also §1.6011-4(e)(2)(i). Thus, for

example, taxpayers who participated in a

Malta personal retirement scheme transaction before the finalization date, but did

not comply with their foreign trust information reporting requirements under section 6048 with respect to such transaction,

have an open period of limitations for

1095

assessments under section 6501(c)(8) and

therefore must file a disclosure statement

with OTSA within 90 calendar days after

the date on which the transaction becomes

a listed transaction.

In addition, material advisers have disclosure requirements with regard to transactions occurring in prior years. However,

notwithstanding §301.6111-3(b)(4)(i) and

(iii), material advisors are required to disclose only if they have made a tax statement on or after the date that is six years

before the date the regulations are published as final regulations in the Federal

Register.

The Treasury Department and the IRS

recognize that some taxpayers may have

filed tax returns taking the position that

they were entitled to the purported tax benefits of the types of transactions described

in these proposed regulations. Because the

IRS will take the position that taxpayers

are not entitled to the purported tax benefits of the listed transactions described

in the proposed regulations, taxpayers

should consider filing amended returns to

ensure that their transactions are disclosed

properly.

Proposed Applicability Date

Proposed §1.6011-12 would identify

certain Malta personal retirement scheme

transactions described in proposed

§1.6011-12(b)(1), except as described

in proposed §1.6011-12(b)(2), as listed

transactions effective as of the date of

publication in the Federal Register of a

Treasury decision adopting these regulations as final regulations.

Special Analyses

I. Regulatory Planning and Review -Economic Analysis

The Administrator of the Office of

Information and Regulatory Affairs

(OIRA), Office of Management and

Budget (OMB), has determined that this

proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action, as that term is defined in

section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,

as amended. Therefore, OIRA has not

reviewed this proposed rule pursuant to

section 6(a)(3)(A) of Executive Order

12866 and April 11, 2018, Memorandum

June 26, 2023

of Agreement between the Treasury

Department and the OMB.

II. Paperwork Reduction Act

The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520) generally requires

that a Federal agency obtain the approval

of the OMB before collecting information

from the public, whether such collection

of information is mandatory, voluntary, or

required to obtain or retain a benefit.

The estimated number of taxpayers

impacted by these proposed regulations

ranges between 50 to 150 per year. No burden on these taxpayers would be imposed

by these proposed regulations. Instead,

the collection of information contained

in these proposed regulations is reflected

in the collection of information for Forms

8886 and 8918 that has been reviewed and

approved by the OMB in accordance with

the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.

3507(c)) under control numbers 15451800 and 1545-0865. Thus, the burden

estimates for the Forms 8886 and 8918

will be adjusted to reflect the taxpayers

impacted by these regulations. An agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person

is not required to respond to, a collection

of information unless the collection of

information displays a valid OMB control

number.

III. Regulatory Flexibility Act

When an agency issues a rulemaking

proposal, the Regulatory Flexibility Act

(5 U.S.C. chapter 6) (“RFA”) requires the

agency “to prepare and make available

for public comment an initial regulatory

flexibility analysis” that will “describe the

impact of the proposed rule on small entities.” See 5 U.S.C. 603(a). Section 605

of the RFA provides an exception to this

requirement if the agency certifies that the

proposed rulemaking will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial

number of small entities. A small entity is

defined as a small business, small nonprofit

organization, or small governmental jurisdiction. See 5 U.S.C. 601(3) through (6).

The Treasury Department and the IRS

do not expect that the proposed regulations will have a significant economic

impact on a substantial number of small

June 26, 2023

entities within the meaning of sections

601(3) through (6) of the RFA. The Malta

personal retirement scheme transaction

described in proposed §1.6011-12 only

applies to U.S. citizens and U.S. resident

individuals, and not entities. Therefore,

with respect to its impact on participants,

proposed §1.6011-12 will not impact

small entities.

The Treasury Department and the IRS

do not have information about which

entities engage in the advising of this

transaction, and therefore cannot accurately estimate the impact of proposed

§1.6011-12 on material advisors that are

small entities. However, the Treasury

Department and the IRS do not expect

proposed §1.6011-12 to impact a substantial number of small entities that may

advise on this transaction. As explained

in section III of the Background section

of this preamble, participants in these

transactions generally have no connection to Malta other than their participation in a Malta personal retirement

scheme primarily to avoid U.S. tax, and

to avoid detection, they may not comply

with their U.S. information reporting

requirements. This tax-avoidance motive

of potential clients who are U.S. persons,

combined with the necessary familiarity with, and access to, Malta’s pension

system and tax law in order to facilitate

the Malta personal retirement scheme

transaction, means that it is unlikely for

a substantial number of small entities to

engage in advising on these transactions.

The Treasury Department and the IRS

request comments from the public on

the number of small entities that may be

impacted and whether that impact will be

economically significant.

Guidance cited in this preamble is published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin and

is available from the Superintendent of

Documents, U.S. Government Publishing

Office, Washington, DC 20402, or by visiting the IRS website at https://www.irs.

gov.

IV. Section 7805(f)

Drafting Information

Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code,

the proposed regulations have been submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy

of the Small Business Administration

for comment on their impact on small

businesses.

The principal authors of these regulations are Lara Banjanin and Tracy Villecco

of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel

(International). However, other personnel

from the Treasury Department and the

IRS participated in their development.

V. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1

Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates

Reform Act of 1995 requires that agencies

Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

1096

assess anticipated costs and benefits and

take certain other actions before issuing a

final rule that includes any Federal mandate that may result in expenditures in any

one year by a State, local, or Tribal government in the aggregate, or by the private

sector, of $100 million in 1995 dollars,

updated annually for inflation. The proposed regulations do not include any

Federal mandate that may result in expenditures by State, local, or Tribal governments or by the private sector in excess of

that threshold.

VI. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

Executive Order 13132 (“Federalism”)

prohibits an agency from publishing any

rule that has federalism implications

if the rule either imposes substantial,

direct compliance costs on State and

local governments, and is not required

by statute, or preempts State law unless

the agency meets the consultation and

funding requirements of section 6 of the

Executive order. The proposed regulations

do not have federalism implications, do

not impose substantial direct compliance

costs on State and local governments, and

do not preempt State law within the meaning of the Executive order.

Statement of Availability of IRS

Documents

Bulletin No. 2023–26

Proposed Amendments to the

Regulations

Accordingly, the Treasury Department

and the IRS propose to amend 26 CFR

part 1 as follows:

PART 1--INCOME TAXES

Paragraph 1. The authority citation for

part 1 continues to read in part as follows:

Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *

*****

Section 1.6011-12 also issued under 26

U.S.C. 6001 and 26 U.S.C. 6011 * * *

*****

Par. 2. Section 1.6011-12 is added to

read as follows:

§1.6011-12 Malta Personal Retirement

Scheme Listed Transaction.

(a) Malta personal retirement scheme

listed transaction. Transactions that are

the same as, or substantially similar to, a

transaction described in paragraph (b)(1)

of this section are identified as listed transactions for purposes of §1.6011-4(b)(2),

except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of

this section. A transaction is not substantially similar unless it involves a retirement arrangement established in Malta

and the taxpayer takes a U.S. Federal

income tax return position based on the

income tax treaty between the United

States and Malta.

(b) Malta personal retirement scheme

transaction—(1) Transaction description.

A transaction is described in this paragraph (b)(1) if:

(i) A U.S. citizen or U.S. resident alien,

directly or indirectly-(A) Transfers (within the meaning of

§1.679-3 or §1.684-2) cash or other property to a personal retirement scheme established under Malta’s Retirement Pension

Act of 2011 (a “Malta personal retirement

scheme”), or

(B) Receives a distribution from a

Malta personal retirement scheme, and

(ii) A U.S. citizen or U.S. resident alien

described in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this

section takes a position on a U.S. Federal

income tax return that--

Bulletin No. 2023–26

(A) Income earned or gain realized by

the Malta personal retirement scheme is

not includible on a current basis in income

for U.S. Federal income tax purposes by

reason of the income tax treaty between

the United States and Malta, or

(B) A distribution received from the

Malta personal retirement scheme attributable to earnings or gains that have not

been included in income for U.S. Federal

income tax purposes is exempt from U.S.

taxation by reason of the income tax treaty

between the United States and Malta.

(2) Exception. If a U.S. citizen or

U.S. resident alien described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section takes a position described in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of

this section on a U.S. Federal income tax

return filed before June 6, 2023, such U.S.

citizen or U.S. resident alien will not be

treated as participating in a listed transaction under this section for the taxable

year to which the U.S. Federal income tax

return relates provided that—

(i) Such U.S. citizen or U.S. resident

alien (the transferor) established the Malta

personal retirement scheme with a transfer

(or rollover) of a pension or other retirement arrangement established in a country

other than Malta or the United States, and

in compliance with the tax laws of such

country;

(ii) The transferor was, when such

pension or retirement arrangement was

established and such rollover occurred, a

resident of the other country under that

country’s tax law, including under Article

4 (Residency) of such country’s income

tax treaty with the United States, if applicable; and

(iii) The transferor’s contributions to

such pension or retirement arrangement

consisted solely of cash in an amount that

bears a relationship to the transferor’s

income earned from the performance of

personal services.

The preceding sentence does not apply,

however, to any U.S. citizen or U.S. resident alien who takes a position described

in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section on a

U.S. Federal income tax return filed on or

after June 6, 2023.

(3) Applicability date—(i) In general.

This section identifies transactions that

are the same as, or substantially similar to,

1097

the transaction described in paragraph (b)

(1) of this section, except as provided in

paragraph (b)(2) of this section, as listed

transactions for purposes of §1.6011-4(b)

(2) and sections 6111 and 6112 effective

[DATE OF PUBLICATION OF THE

FINAL REGULATIONS IN THE

FEDERAL REGISTER].

(ii) Obligations of participants with

respect to prior periods. Pursuant to

§1.6011-4(d) and (e), taxpayers who have

filed a tax return (including an amended

return) reflecting their participation in

these transactions prior to [DATE OF

PUBLICATION OF THE FINAL

REGULATIONS IN THE FEDERAL

REGISTER], who have not otherwise

finalized a settlement agreement with the

Internal Revenue Service with respect to

the transaction, must disclose the transactions as provided in §1.6011-4(d) and

(e) provided that the period of limitations

for assessment of tax for any taxable year

in which the taxpayer participated in the

transaction has not ended on or before

[DATE OF PUBLICATION OF THE

FINAL REGULATIONS IN THE

FEDERAL REGISTER].

(iii) Obligations of material advisors

with respect to prior periods. Material

advisors defined in §301.6111-3(b) of

this chapter who have previously made

a tax statement with respect to a transaction described in paragraph (b)(1) of this

section, except as provided in paragraph

(b)(2) of this section, have disclosure and

list maintenance obligations as described

in §§301.6111-3 and 301.6112-1 of this

chapter, respectively. Notwithstanding

§301.6111-3(b)(4)(i) and (iii) of this

chapter, material advisors are required

to disclose only if they have made a tax

statement on or after the date that is six

years before the date the regulations

are published as final regulations in the

Federal Register.

Douglas W. O’Donnell,

Deputy Commissioner for Services

and Enforcement.

(Filed by the Office of the Federal Register June 6,

2023, 8:45 a.m., and published in the issue of the

Federal Register for June 7, 2023, 88 FR 37186)

June 26, 2023

Notice of Proposed

Rulemaking

Additional Guidance on

Low-Income Communities

Bonus Credit Program

REG-110412-23

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service

(IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

SUMMARY: This document contains

proposed rules concerning the low-income communities bonus energy investment credit program established pursuant

to the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022.

Applicants investing in certain solar

and wind powered-electricity generation facilities may apply for an allocation of environmental justice solar and

wind capacity limitation to increase

the amount of an energy investment

credit for the taxable year in which the

facility is placed in service. This document describes proposed definitions and

requirements that would be applicable

for the program allocating the calendar

year 2023 capacity limitation, which also

would inform guidance applicable for

future program years. The proposed rules

would affect applicants seeking allocations of environmental justice solar and

wind capacity limitation.

DATES: Written or electronic comments

must be received by June 30, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Stakeholders are strongly

encouraged to submit public comments

electronically. Submit electronic submissions via the Federal eRulemaking Portal

at https://www.regulations.gov (indicate

IRS and REG-110412-23) by following

the online instructions for submitting

comments. Once submitted to the Federal

eRulemaking Portal, comments cannot be

edited or withdrawn. The Department of

the Treasury (Treasury Department) and

the IRS will publish for public availability any comments submitted, whether

electronically or on paper, to the IRS’s

June 26, 2023

public docket. Send paper submissions

to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-110412-23),

Room 5203, Internal Revenue Service,

P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,

Washington, DC 20044.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT: Concerning the proposed

rules, Office of Associate Chief Counsel

(Passthroughs & Special Industries) at

(202) 317–6853 (not a toll-free number);

concerning submissions of written comments, Vivian Hayes at (202) 317-5306

(not a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

I. Overview

Section 13103 of Public Law 117169, 136 Stat. 1818, 1921 (August 16,

2022), commonly known as the Inflation

Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA), added new

section 48(e) to the Internal Revenue

Code (Code) to increase the amount of

the energy investment credit determined

under section 48(a) (section 48 credit)

with respect to eligible property that is part

of a qualified solar and wind facility that

is awarded an allocation of environmental

justice solar and wind capacity limitation

(Capacity Limitation). This document

contains proposed definitions and rules

relating to the allocation of Capacity

Limitation for calendar year 2023 (2023

Capacity Limitation).

The amount of the energy investment

credit determined under the section 48

credit for a taxable year is generally calculated by multiplying the basis of each

energy property placed in service during

that taxable year by the energy percentage

(as defined in section 48(a)(2)). Section

48(e) increases the section 48 credit by

increasing the energy percentage used

to calculate the amount of the section

48 credit (section 48(e) Increase) in the

case of qualified solar and wind facilities that receive an allocation of Capacity

Limitation. The term “qualified solar and

wind facility” is defined in section 48(e)

(2) to mean any facility that (i) generates

electricity solely from a wind facility, solar

energy property, or small wind energy

property; (ii) has a maximum net output

of less than 5 megawatts (as measured in

1098

alternating current); and (iii) is described

in at least one of four categories in section 48(e)(2)(A)(iii) (and in part II of this

Background).

As described in part III of this

Background, section 48(e)(4)(A) directs

the Secretary of the Treasury or her delegate (Secretary) to “provide procedures

to allow for an efficient allocation” of

Capacity Limitation to qualified solar

and wind facilities. Later this year, the

Treasury Department and the IRS expect

to issue details for the program applicable for the calendar year 2023 Capacity

Limitation, covering a comprehensive set

of procedures and rules for applicants.

The majority of the information regarding

the program’s details will be procedural

rules. Some of the information that the

Treasury Department and the IRS intend

to include, however, will provide more

substantive details that cover threshold

definitions and requirements that must be

established to make allocations efficiently

and effectively. Those aspects of the program’s details are the subject of this notice

of proposed rulemaking. The Treasury

Department and the IRS expect that final

guidance will be reflected in regulations.

II. Four Categories of Qualified Solar

and Wind Facilities

Depending on the category of the facility, an allocation of Capacity Limitation

may result in a section 48(e) Increase

equal to either 10 percentage points or 20

percentage points. Section 48(e)(1)(A)(i)

provides for a section 48(e) Increase of 10

percentage points for eligible property that

is located in a low-income community,

as defined in section 45D(e) (Category 1

facility), or on Indian land, as defined in

section 2601(2) of the Energy Policy Act

of 1992 (25 U.S.C. 3501(2)) (Category 2

facility). Section 48(e)(1)(A)(ii) provides

for a section 48(e) Increase of 20 percentage points for eligible property that is

part of a qualified low-income residential

building project (Category 3 facility) or

a qualified low-income economic benefit project (Category 4 facility). Under

section 48(e)(1)(A)(i), a Category 1 or

Category 2 facility that also qualifies as a

Category 3 or Category 4 facility is considered a Category 3 facility or Category

4 facility (as applicable).

Bulletin No. 2023–26

Section 48(e)(2)(B) provides that a

facility will be treated as part of a qualified low-income residential building

project if such facility is installed on a residential rental building which participates

in a covered housing program (as defined

in § 41411(a) of the Violence Against

Women Act of 1994 (34 U.S.C. 12491(a)

(3)), a housing assistance program administered by the Department of Agriculture

under title V of the Housing Act of 1949,

a housing program administered by a tribally designated housing entity (as defined

in § 4(22) of the Native American Housing

Assistance and Self-Determination Act

of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 4103(22)), or such

other affordable housing programs as the

Secretary may provide, and (ii) the financial benefits of the electricity produced

by such facility are allocated equitably

among the occupants of the dwelling units

of such building.

Section 48(e)(2)(C) provides that a

facility will be treated as part of a qualified low-income economic benefit project

if at least 50 percent of the financial benefits of the electricity produced by such

facility are provided to households with

income of less than 200 percent of the

poverty line (as defined in section 36B(d)

(3)(A) of the Code) applicable to a family of the size involved, or less than 80

percent of area median gross income (as

determined under section 142(d)(2)(B) of

the Code).

For a qualified low-income residential

building project and a qualified low-income economic benefit project, section

48(e)(2)(D) provides that electricity

acquired at a below-market rate will be

considered a financial benefit.

III. Overview of Low-Income

Communities Bonus Credit Program

Section 48(e)(4) directs the Secretary

to establish a program, within 180 days

of enactment of the IRA, to allocate

amounts of Capacity Limitation to qualified solar and wind facilities. Notice

2023-17, 2023-10 I.R.B. 505, established the program under section 48(e) to

allow amounts of Capacity Limitation to

be allocated to qualified solar and wind

facilities eligible for the section 48 credit

(Low-Income Communities Bonus Credit

Program).1 Under section 48(e)(4)(C),

the total annual Capacity Limitation that

may be allocated under the Low-Income

Communities Bonus Credit Program is

1.8 gigawatts of direct current capacity for

each of the calendar years 2023 and 2024.

Under section 48(e)(4)(D), if the annual

Capacity Limitation for any calendar year

exceeds the aggregate amount allocated

for such year, the excess is carried forward

to the next year, but not beyond calendar

year 2024.2

Consistent with Notice 2023-17, the

Treasury Department and the IRS propose

to reserve a portion of the total annual

Capacity Limitation of 1.8 gigawatts of

direct current capacity for each facility category for calendar year 2023 as

follows:

Category 1: Located in a Low-Income Community

700 megawatts

Category 2: Located on Indian Land

200 megawatts

Category 3: Qualified Low-Income Residential Building Project

200 megawatts

Category 4: Qualified Low-Income Economic Benefit Project

700 megawatts

The proposed rules in this document

would supplement the guidance provided

in Notice 2023-17 to outline the specific application procedures, additional

allocation criteria, and applicable definitions, among other information, necessary to submit an application to request

an allocation of the Capacity Limitation

for calendar year 2023 under the LowIncome Communities Bonus Credit

Program. The Treasury Department and

the IRS request comments on these proposed definitions and requirements. The

Treasury Department and the IRS also

request comment on whether these proposed definitions and requirements should

apply for purposes of the Low-Income

Communities Bonus Credit Program for

calendar year 2024 and the program to

be established under section 48E(h) for

calendar year 2025 and future years. The

Treasury Department and the IRS anticipate further evaluating the program for

2023 to determine what further guidance

may be helpful or necessary in the future.

Explanation of Proposed Rules

The proposed rules relate to specific

definitions and requirements regarding

the following topics: (1) the definition

of facility based on single project factors; (2) the definition of “in connection

with” to demonstrate what it means for

energy storage technology to be considered part of eligible property of the

qualified facility; (3) definitions of the

terms “financial benefit” and “electricity

acquired at a below market rate” under

section 48(e)(2)(D), as well as a manner

to apply such definitions, appropriately,

to Category 3 facilities that are part of

qualified low-income residential building

projects and Category 4 facilities that are

part of qualified economic benefit projects; (4) the definition of “located in” for

relevant geographic criteria; (5) a rule for

facilities placed in service prior to an allocation award; (6) reservations of Capacity

Limitation allocation for applicant facilities that meet certain Additional Selection

Notice 2023-17 describes several other definitions and requirements related to the Low-Income Communities Bonus Credit Program.

Section 13702(a) of the IRA also enacted section 48E(h), which generally provides for a program similar to the Low-Income Communities Bonus Credit Program for calendar years after

2024. Section 48E(i) directs the Secretary to issue guidance regarding the implementation of section 48E not later than January 1, 2025. Any excess Capacity Limitation from calendar year

2024 may be carried forward and applied to the Capacity Limitation for calendar year 2025 under new section 48E(h)(4)(D)(ii). The Treasury Department and the IRS anticipate that operation

of the Low-Income Communities Bonus Credit Program will inform the operation of the section 48E(h) program generally, as described in future guidance.

1

2

Bulletin No. 2023–26

1099

June 26, 2023

Criteria; (7) sub-reservations of Capacity

Limitation allocation for facilities built in

a low-income community; (8) application

materials demonstrating facility viability

in order to allow for an efficient allocation process; (9) documentation and attestations to be submitted when a facility is

placed in service; and (10) post-allocation

compliance including disqualification and

recapture of section 48(e) Increases.

I. Proposed Definitions and Requirements

A. Definition of Facility

The term “qualified solar and wind

facility” is defined in section 48(e)(2)

(A) to mean any facility that (i) generates electricity solely from a wind facility, solar energy property, or small wind

energy property; (ii) has a maximum net

output of less than 5 megawatts (as measured in alternating current); and (iii) is

described in at least one of the four categories described in section 48(e)(2)(A)

(iii) (Category 1, 2, 3, or 4). The Treasury

Department and the IRS are concerned

that some applicants may attempt to circumvent the less than 5-megawatt output

limitation provided in section 48(e)(2)(A)

(ii) by artificially dividing larger projects

into multiple facilities. To prevent applicants from dividing larger projects that

should be regarded as a single facility

under section 48(e)(2)(A), solely for the

purpose of the Low-Income Communities

Bonus Credit Program, the Treasury

Department and the IRS propose to aggregate into a single “qualified solar and

wind facility” multiple facilities or energy

properties of the same type (solar or wind)

that are operated as part of a single project

consistent with the single-project factors

provided in section 7.01(2)(a) of Notice

2018-59, 2018-28 I.R.B. 196 or section

4.04(2) of Notice 2013-29, 2013-20 I.R.B.

1085, as applicable.

Therefore, the Treasury Department

and the IRS propose to define a single

qualified solar or wind facility as any

facility that (i) generates electricity solely

from a wind facility, solar energy property, or small wind energy property; (ii)

that has a maximum net output of less than

5 megawatts (as measured in alternating

current); and (iii) that is described in at

June 26, 2023

least one of the four categories described

in section 48(e)(2)(A)(iii) (Category 1,

2, 3, or 4). In addition, for purposes of

determining allocations, administering the

program fairly, and avoiding abuse, the

Treasury Department and the IRS propose

that multiple solar or wind energy properties or facilities that are operated as part

of a single project would be aggregated

and treated as a single facility. Whether

multiple facilities or energy properties are

operated as part of a single project would

depend on the relevant facts and circumstances and would be evaluated based on

the factors provided in section 7.01(2)(a)

of Notice 2018-59 or section 4.04(2) of

Notice 2013-29, as applicable.

B. Energy Storage Technology Installed

in Connection with Solar and Wind

Facility

Section 48(e)(3) defines “eligible property” to mean energy property that (i) is

part of a wind facility described in section

45(d)(1) for which an election to treat

the facility as energy property was made

under section 48(a)(5) (wind facility), or

(ii) is solar energy property described in

section 48(a)(3)(A)(i) (solar energy property) or qualified small wind energy property described in section 48(a)(3)(A)(vi)

(small wind energy property), including

energy storage technology (as described

in section 48(a)(3)(A)(ix)) “installed in

connection with” such qualifying energy

property. The Treasury Department and

the IRS propose to define “installed in

connection with” for energy storage technology to demonstrate what is required

for such energy storage technology to be

considered eligible property under section 48(e)(3).

Under the proposed definition energy

storage technology would be “installed in

connection with” other eligible property if

both (1) the energy storage technology and

other eligible property are considered part

of a single qualified solar and wind facility because the energy storage technology

and other eligible property are owned by a

single legal entity, located on the same or

contiguous pieces of land, have a common

interconnection point, and are described

in one or more common environmental

or other regulatory permits; and (2) the

1100

energy storage technology is charged no

less than 50 percent by the other eligible

property. The Treasury Department and

the IRS also propose to add a safe harbor,

which would deem the energy storage

technology to be charged at least 50 percent by the facility if the power rating of

the energy storage technology (in kW) is

less than 2 times the capacity rating of the

connected wind facility (in kW alternating current) or solar facility (in kW direct

current).

C. Financial Benefits for Category 3 and

Category 4 Allocations

Section 48(e)(2)(D) provides that

“electricity acquired at a below market rate” will not fail to be taken into

account as a financial benefit. To clarify

this language, the Treasury Department

and the IRS propose definitions of the

terms “financial benefit” and “electricity

acquired at a below market rate” under

section 48(e)(2)(D), as well as a manner

to apply such definitions, appropriately, to

qualified low-income residential building

projects (section 48(e)(2)(B)) and qualified economic benefit projects (section

48(e)(2)(C)). The definitions and requirements would be different for an allocation

in Category 3 (section 48(e)(2)(B)) and

Category 4 (section 48(e)(2)(C)).

1. Financial Benefits for Qualified LowIncome Residential Building Projects

For a facility to be treated as part of a

qualified low-income residential building

project, section 48(e)(2)(B)(ii) provides

that the financial benefits of the electricity

produced by such facility must be allocated equitably among the occupants of

the dwelling units of a residential rental

building that participates in a covered

housing program or other affordable housing program (qualified residential property). The Treasury Department and the

IRS propose to reserve allocations under

this category exclusively for applicants

that would apply the financial benefits

requirement under Category 3 in the following manner.

The Treasury Department and the

IRS propose that financial benefit can be

demonstrated through net energy savings

Bulletin No. 2023–26

as defined below. At least 50 percent of

the financial value of net energy savings would be required to be equitably

passed on to building occupants. This

requirement would recognize that not all

the financial value of the net energy savings can be passed on to building occupants because a certain percentage can

be assumed to be dedicated to lowering

the operational costs of energy consumption for common areas, which benefits

all building occupants. The Treasury

Department and the IRS propose to

reserve allocations under this category

exclusively for applicants that would

equitably pass on net energy savings by

distributing equal shares among the qualified residential property’s units that are

designated as low-income under the covered housing program, or by distributing

proportional shares based on each dwelling unit’s electricity usage.

This proposal accounts for the specific

nature of facilities serving low-income

residential buildings and facility ownership, as the facility may be third party

owned or commonly owned with the

building.

a. Facility and Qualified Residential

Property Have Same Ownership

In scenarios where the facility and the

qualified residential property have the

same ownership, the Treasury Department

and the IRS propose to define the financial

value of net energy savings as the financial value equal to the greater of: (1) 25

percent of the gross financial value of the

annual energy produced or (2) the gross

financial value of the annual energy produced minus the annual costs to operate

the facility. Gross financial value of the

annual energy produced is calculated as

the sum of (a) the total self-consumed

kilowatt-hours produced by the qualified solar and wind facility multiplied by

the applicable building’s metered price

of electricity and (b) the total exported

kilowatt-hours produced by the qualified

solar and wind facility multiplied by the

applicable building’s volumetric export

compensation rate for solar and wind

kilowatt-hours. The annual operating

costs are calculated as the sum of annual

debt service, maintenance, replacement

reserve, and other costs associated with

maintaining and operating the qualified

solar and wind facility.

If the facility and building are commonly owned, a signed benefits sharing

agreement between the building owner

and the tenants would be required. The

Treasury Department and the IRS request

comments on how to adjust definitions

of gross financial value to account for

scenarios in which building occupants

are compensating the facility owner for

energy services.

b. Facility and Qualified Residential

Property Have Different Ownership

In scenarios where the facility and the

qualified residential property have different ownership and the facility owner

enters into a power purchase agreement

or other contract for energy services with

the qualified residential property owner,

the Treasury Department and the IRS

propose to define net energy savings as

equal to the greater of: (1) 50 percent of

the financial value of the annual energy

produced by the facility which accrues

to the owner of the qualified residential

property in the form of utility bill credit

and/or cash payments for net excess generation or (2) the financial value of the

annual energy produced by the facility

which accrues to the owner of the qualified residential property in the form of

utility bill credit and/or cash payments

for net excess generation minus any payments made by the building owner to the

facility owner for energy services associated with the facility in a given year. In

these scenarios, the facility owner must

enter into an agreement with the building

owner for the building owner to distribute the savings to residents.

The Treasury Department and the IRS

request comments on how to adjust definitions of gross financial value to account

for scenarios in which building occupants

are compensating the facility owner for

energy services.

c. Impact of Metering on Delivery of

Financial Benefits

Regardless of ownership, residential

buildings may have master-metered or

sub-metered utilities. The financial benefits of the electricity produced by the

facility cannot be distributed to residents

in master-metered buildings in the same

manner as in sub-metered buildings and

is often administratively infeasible in certain sub-metered buildings. Therefore, the

Treasury Department and the IRS propose that for sub-metered buildings, the

tenants must receive the financial value

associated with utility bill savings in the

form of a credit on their utility bills. The

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban

Development (HUD) has issued guidance

for residents of sub-metered HUD-assisted

housing that participate in community

solar, providing an analysis of how community solar credits may affect utility

allowance and annual income for rent calculations.3 The Treasury Department and

the IRS propose that applicants follow the

HUD guidance and future HUD guidance

on this issue to ensure that tenants’ utility allowances and annual income for rent

calculations are not negatively impacted.

The Treasury Department and the IRS

are aware that in some States or jurisdictions it may not be administratively, or

legally, possible to apply utility bill savings on residents’ electricity bills. The

Treasury Department and the IRS request

comments on this issue and how financial

benefits, such as services and building

improvements, can be provided to residents in such residential buildings

For master-metered buildings, the

Treasury Department and the IRS propose that because residents do not have

individually metered utilities and do not

receive utility bills, the building owner

must pass on the savings through other

means, such as by providing certain benefits to the building residents beyond

those provided prior to the qualified solar

and wind facility being placed in service.

HUD has issued guidance for how residents of mastered-metered HUD-assisted

housing can benefit from owners’ sharing

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Treatment of Community Solar Credits on Tenant Utility Bills (July 2020): MF Memo re Community Solar Credits July 14 Draft

(hud.gov).

3

Bulletin No. 2023–26

1101

June 26, 2023

financial benefits accrued from an investment in solar energy generation.4 The

Treasury Department and the IRS propose

that applicants follow the HUD guidance

and future HUD guidance on this issue to

ensure that tenants’ utility allowances and

annual income for rent calculations are

not negatively impacted.

2. Financial Benefits in Qualified LowIncome Economic Benefit Projects

For a facility to be treated as part of a

qualified low-income economic benefit

project, section 48(e)(2)(C) requires that

at least 50 percent of the financial benefits

of the electricity produced by the facility

be provided to qualifying low-income

households. To satisfy this standard, the

Treasury Department and the IRS propose

to require that the facility serves multiple households and at least 50 percent of

the facility’s total output is distributed to

qualifying low-income households under

section 48(e)(2)(C)(i) or (ii). In addition,

to further the overall goals of the program,

the Treasury Department and the IRS propose to reserve allocations under this category exclusively for applicants that would

provide at least a 20-percent bill credit

discount rate for all such low-income

households. The Treasury Department

and the IRS propose defining a “bill credit

discount rate” as the difference between

the financial benefit distributed to the

low-income household (including utility

bill credits, reductions in the low-income

household’s electricity rate, or other monetary benefits accrued by the household)

and the cost of participating in the program (including subscription payments

for renewable energy and any other fees or

charges), expressed as a percentage of the

financial benefit distributed to the low-income household. The bill credit discount

rate can be calculated by starting with the

financial benefit distributed to the low-income household, subtracting all payments

made by the low-income customer to the

facility owner and any related third parties as a condition of receiving that financial benefit, then dividing that difference

by the financial benefit distributed to the

low-income household.

To ensure these requirements are met,

verification of households’ qualifying

low-income status is required. Applicants

are responsible for proof-of-income verification and would be required to submit

documentation upon placing the qualified solar and wind facility in service that

identifies each qualifying low-income

household, the output allocated to each

qualifying low-income household in kW,

and the method of income verification

utilized.

Applicants may use category eligibility or other income verification methods to qualify low-income households.

Categorical eligibility consists of obtaining proof of household participation in a

needs-based Federal5, State, Tribal, or utility program with income limits at or below

the qualifying income level for the specific

facility (qualifying program). State agencies (for example, state community solar/

wind program administrators) can also

provide verification of low-income status

if the State program’s income limits are at

or below the qualifying income level for

the qualified solar and wind facility. If a

household is not enrolled in a qualifying

program, additional income verification

methods can be used such as: paystubs,

tax returns, or income verification through

crediting agencies and commercial data

sources. Eligibility based on the applicant

(or contractors or subcontractors) collecting self-attestations is not permissible.

geographic area if 50 percent or more

of the facility’s nameplate capacity is in

a qualifying area. A facility’s nameplate

capacity percentage is determined by

dividing the nameplate capacity of the

facility’s energy-generating units that are

located in the qualifying area by the total

nameplate capacity of all the energy-generating units of the facility.

Nameplate capacity for an electricity generating unit means the maximum

electricity generating output that the unit

is capable of producing on a steady state

basis and during continuous operation

under standard conditions, as measured

by the manufacturer and consistent with

the definition provided in 40 CFR 96.202.

Energy-generating units that generate

direct current (DC) power before converting to alternating current (AC) (for

example, solar photovoltaic) should use

the nameplate capacity in DC, otherwise

the nameplate capacity in AC should be

used (for example, wind facilities). Where

applicable, the International Standard

Organization (ISO) conditions are used to

measure the maximum electricity generating output or usable energy capacity. The

nameplate capacity of any energy storage

technology installed in connection with

the qualified solar and wind facility does

not affect the assessment of the Nameplate

Capacity Test.

II. Proposed Program Requirements and

Structure

D. Location

A. Placed in Service Prior to Allocation

Award

A qualified solar and wind facility

is treated as “located in a low-income

community” or “on Indian Land” under

section 48(e)(2)(A)(iii)(I) or located in

a geographic area under the Additional

Selection Criteria (see part II.C) if the

facility satisfies the nameplate capacity

test (Nameplate Capacity Test).

Under the Nameplate Capacity Test, a

facility that has nameplate capacity (for

example, wind and solar facilities) is

considered located in or on the relevant

As stated in section 4.05 of Notice

2023-17, the Treasury Department and the

IRS propose that facilities placed in service prior to being awarded an allocation

of Capacity Limitation would not be eligible to receive an allocation. As described

in Notice 2023-17, one of the broad goals

of the Low-Income Communities Bonus

Credit Program is to increase adoption

of and access to renewable energy facilities in low-income and other communities with environmental justice concerns.

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Treatment of Solar Benefits in Mastered-metered Buildings (May 2023), MF_Memo_re_Community_Solar_Credits_in_MM_

Buildings.pdf (hud.gov)

5

Federal programs may include, but are not limited to: Medicaid, Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP), Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP), Supplemental

Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), Section 8 Project-Based Rental Assistance, and the Housing Choice Voucher Program.

4

June 26, 2023

1102

Bulletin No. 2023–26

Facilities that were placed in service

prior to the allocation process do not

increase adoption of and access to renewable energy facilities as compared to the

absence of the Low-Income Communities

Bonus Credit Program. Further, section

48(e)(4)(E)(i) provides that a facility must

be placed in service within four years

of receiving an allocation of Capacity

Limitation, supporting allocations to new

facilities that have not yet been placed

in service. Accordingly, the Treasury

Department and the IRS continue to

propose that facilities placed in service

prior to being awarded an allocation of

Capacity Limitation would not be eligible

to receive an allocation.

B. Selection Process

Under section 48(e)(4)(C), the total

annual Capacity Limitation is 1.8 gigawatts of direct current capacity for the

calendar year 2023 program. Section

4.02 of Notice 2023-17 specified how

the annual Capacity Limitation would be

allocated across the four facility categories in 2023: Located in a Low-Income

Community (Category 1), Located on

Indian Land (Category 2), Qualified

Low-Income Residential Building Project

(Category 3), and Qualified Low-Income

Economic Benefit Project (Category 4).

Section 4.07 of Notice 2023-17 provided

that applications would be accepted in a

phased approach for calendar year 2023,

during 60-day application windows.

Based on public feedback in response to

Notice 2023-17 and an updated assessment of operational capabilities set up to

administer the program, a new approach

is proposed.

The Treasury Department and the

IRS anticipate that the number of eligible applicants seeking an allocation may

exceed the total Capacity Limitation

allocation available to be allocated. The

Treasury Department and the IRS are

designing an application process that

both ensures that allocations are awarded

to facilities that advance the program

goals previously stated in Notice 202317 and facilitates an efficient allocation

process.

Accordingly, the Treasury Department

and the IRS propose an approach that

includes an initial application window

in which applications received by a certain time and date would be evaluated

together, followed with a rolling application process if Capacity Limitation is not

fully allocated after the initial application

window closes. Facilities that meet at least

one of the two categories of specified ownership and geographic criteria (Additional

Selection Criteria) would receive priority

for an allocation within each facility category described in section 48(e)(2)(A)

(iii). The Treasury Department and the

IRS propose that at least 50 percent of the

total Capacity Limitation in each facility

category would be reserved for facilities

meeting Additional Selection Criteria in

the following fashion.

In evaluating applications received

during the initial application window,

priority would be given to eligible applications for facilities meeting at least one

of the two Additional Selection Criteria.

If the eligible applications for Capacity

Limitation for facilities that meet at

least one of the two Additional Selection

Criteria categories exceed the Capacity

Limitation for a category, facilities meeting both of the Additional Selection

Criteria categories would be prioritized

for an allocation. A lottery system may

be used in oversubscribed categories to

decide among similarly situated applications (for example, facilities that meet

both of the Additional Selection Criteria

categories, facilities that meet only one of

the two Additional Selection Criteria categories, facilities that do not meet either

of the Additional Selection Criteria categories). An applicant could not administratively appeal the Capacity Limitation

allocation decisions made under the

Low-Income Communities Bonus Credit

Program.

If eligible applications for facilities that meet at least one of the two

Additional Selection Criteria categories

received during the initial application

window total less than 50 percent of the

Capacity Limitation for a category, additional Capacity Limitation would be

reserved during the rolling application

period such that 50 percent of the total

Capacity Limitation in the category would

be reserved for these facilities.

The Treasury Department and the IRS

would retain the discretion to reallocate

Capacity Limitation across categories and

sub-categories in order to maximize allocation in the event one category or sub-category is oversubscribed and another has

excess capacity.

C. Additional Selection Criteria

The Treasury Department and the IRS

propose that the two Additional Selection

Criteria are Ownership Criteria and

Geographic Criteria.

1. Ownership Criteria

The Ownership Criteria category is

based on characteristics of the applicant

that owns the qualified solar and wind

facility. A qualified solar and wind facility

would meet the Ownership Criteria if it is

owned by a Tribal Enterprise, an Alaska

Native Corporation, a renewable energy

cooperative, a qualified renewable energy

company meeting certain characteristics,

or a qualified tax-exempt entity. If an

applicant wholly owns an entity that is the

owner of a qualified solar and wind facility, and the entity is disregarded as separate from its owner for Federal income

tax purposes (disregarded entity), the

applicant, and not the disregarded entity,

is treated as the owner of the qualified

solar and wind facility for purposes of the

Ownership Criteria.

a. Tribal Enterprise

A “Tribal Enterprise” for purposes of

the Ownership Criteria is an entity that

is (1) an Indian Tribal government (as

defined in section 30D(g)(9) of the Code)

that owns at least a 51 percent interest

in, either directly or indirectly (through a

wholly owned corporation created under

its Tribal laws or through a section 3 or

section 17 Corporation)6, and (2) the

Indian Tribal government has the power

to appoint and remove a majority (more

than 50 percent) of the individuals serving

A “section 17 corporation” is a corporation incorporated under the authority of section 17 of the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934, 25 U.S.C. 5124. A “section 3 corporation” is a corporation

that is incorporated under the authority of section 3 of the Oklahoma Indian Welfare Act, 25 U.S.C. 5203.

6

Bulletin No. 2023–26

1103

June 26, 2023

on the entity’s board of directors or equivalent governing board.

b. Alaska Native Corporation

An “Alaska Native corporation”

for purposes of the Ownership Criteria

is defined in section 3 of the Alaska

Native Claims Settlement Act, 43 U.S.C.

1602(m).

c. Renewable Energy Cooperative

A “renewable energy cooperative” for

purposes of the Ownership Criteria is an

entity that develops qualified solar and/

or wind facilities and owns at least 51

percent of a facility and is either (1) a

consumer or purchasing cooperative controlled by its members who are low-income households (as defined in section

48(e)(2)(C)) with each member having an

equal voting right, or (2) a worker cooperative controlled by its worker-members

with each member having an equal voting right.

d. Qualified Renewable Energy Company

A “qualified renewable energy company” for purposes of the Ownership

Criteria would be an entity that serves

low-income communities and provides

pathways for the adoption of clean energy

by low-income households. In addition to

its general business purpose, the Treasury

Department and the IRS are considering

the following requirements that a qualified

renewable energy company would need to

satisfy:

(1) At least 51 percent of the entity’s

equity interests are owned and controlled

by (a) one or more individuals, (b) a

Community Development Corporation

(as defined in 13 CFR 124.3), (c) an agricultural or horticultural cooperative (as

defined in section 199A(g)(4)(A) of the

Code), (d) an Indian Tribal government

(as defined in section 30D(g)(9)), (e) an

Alaska Native corporation (as defined

in section 3 of the Alaska Native Claims

Settlement Act, 43 U.S.C. 1602(m)), or

(f) a Native Hawaiian organization (as

defined in 13 CFR 124.3);

(2) After applying the controlled group

rules under section 52(a) of the Code, has

less than 10 full-time equivalent employees (as determined under section 4980H(c)

(2)(E) and (c)(4) of the Code) and less

than $5 million in annual gross receipts in

the previous calendar year;

(3) First installed or operated a qualified solar and wind facility as defined in

section 48(e)(2)(A) two or more years

prior to the date of application; and

(4) Has installed and/or operated qualified solar and wind facilities as defined in

section 48(e)(2)(A) with at least 100kW of

cumulative nameplate capacity located in

one or more Low-Income Communities as

defined in section 48(e)(2)(A)(iii)(I).

The Treasury Department and the

IRS specifically request comments on

these proposed elements for determining

whether a business is a qualified renewable energy company. The Treasury

Department and the IRS also request comments on an administrable rule to ensure

that qualified renewable energy companies are employing workers in the LowIncome Communities.

e. Qualified Tax-exempt Entity

A “qualified tax-exempt entity” for

purposes of the Ownership Criteria is:

(1) An organization exempt from the

tax imposed by subtitle A of the Code

by reason of being described in section

501(c)(3) or section 501(d);

(2) Any State, the District of Columbia,

or political subdivision thereof, any territory of the United States, or any agency

or instrumentality of any of the foregoing;

(3) An Indian Tribal government (as

defined in section 30D(g)(9)), political

subdivision thereof, or any agency or

instrumentality of any of the foregoing; or

(4) Any corporation described in section 501(c)(12) operating on a cooperative

basis which is engaged in furnishing electric energy to persons in rural areas.

2. Geographic Criteria

The Geographic Criteria category

is based on where the facility will be

placed in service. To meet the Geographic

Criteria, a facility would need to be located

in a Persistent Poverty County (PPC)7 or

in a census tract that is designated in the

Climate and Economic Justice Screening

Tool (CEJST) as disadvantaged based

on whether the tract is either (a) greater

than or equal to the 90th percentile for

energy burden and is greater than or equal

to the 65th percentile for low income, or

(b) greater than or equal to the 90th percentile for PM2.5 exposure and is greater

than or equal to the 65th percentile for

low income.8 The Treasury Department

and the IRS propose that applicants who

meet the Geographic Criteria at the time

of application are considered to continue

to meet the Geographic Criteria for the

duration of the recapture period, unless

the location of the facility changes.

A PPC is generally defined as any

county where 20 percent or more of

residents have experienced high rates

of poverty over the past 30 years.

For the purposes of the Low-Income

Communities Bonus Credit Program, the

Treasury Department and the IRS propose

the PPC measure adopted by the U.S.

Department of Agriculture to make this

determination. The most recent measure,

which would apply for the 2023 program

year, incorporates poverty estimates from

the 1980, 1990, 2000 censuses, and 200711 American Community Survey 5-year

average.

D. Sub-Reservations of Allocation for

Facilities Located in a Low-Income

Community

Notice 2023-17 provided that 700

megawatts of 2023 calendar year Capacity

Limitation would be reserved for Category

1. The Treasury Department and the IRS

anticipate that Category 1 will receive the

largest number of applications, and that

most applications will be for small rooftop

https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/county-typology-codes/

https://screeningtool.geoplatform.gov/en/#3/33.47/-97.5. The CEJST website provides further detail on the terms used in identifying census tracts for the Energy category. “Energy cost”

is defined as “Average household annual energy cost in dollars divided by the average household income.” PM2.5 is defined as “Fine inhalable particles with 2.5 or smaller micrometer

diameters. The percentile is the weight of the particles per cubic meter.” “Low income” is defined as “Percent of a census tract’s population in households where household income is at or

below 200% of the Federal poverty level, not including students enrolled in higher education.” See Methodology & data - Climate & Economic Justice Screening Tool (geoplatform.gov)

7

8

June 26, 2023

1104

Bulletin No. 2023–26

residential solar facilities. Therefore, the

Treasury Department and the IRS propose to subdivide the 700 MW Capacity

Limitation reservation for facilities seeking a Category 1 allocation with 560

megawatts reserved specifically for eligible residential behind the meter (BTM)

facilities, including rooftop solar. The

sub-reservation of a substantial portion

of the allocation in Category 1 for eligible residential BTM facilities would help

ensure that allocations are predominantly

awarded to facilities serving residences

and consumers, rather than facilities serving businesses. The remaining 140 megawatts of Capacity Limitation would be

available for applicants with front of the

meter (FTM) facilities as well as non-residential BTM facilities.

The Treasury Department and the

IRS propose to define an eligible residential BTM facility as single-family or

multi-family residential qualified solar

and wind facility that does not meet the

requirements for Category 3 and is BTM.

A qualified wind and solar facility is

BTM if: (1) it is connected with an electrical connection between the facility and

the panelboard or sub-panelboard of the

site where the facility is located, (2) it is

to be connected on the customer side of

a utility service meter before it connects

to a distribution or transmission system

(that is, before it connects to the electricity grid), and (3) its primary purpose is to

provide electricity to the utility customer

of the site where the facility is located.

This also includes systems not connected

to a grid and that may not have a utility

service meter, and whose primary purpose is to serve the electricity demand of

the owner of the site where the system is

located.

The Treasury Department and the IRS

propose to define a FTM facility. A facility

is FTM if it is directly connected to a grid

and its sole purpose is to provide electricity to one or more offsite locations via

such grid; alternatively, FTM is defined as

a facility that is not BTM.

E. Application Materials

Section 48(e)(4)(A) directs the Secretary

to provide procedures to allow for an efficient allocation process. Additionally, section 48(e)(4)(E)(i) requires that facilities

allocated an amount of Capacity Limitation

be placed in service within four years of the

date of allocation. To promote efficient allocation, and to better ensure that allocations

will be awarded to facilities that are sufficiently viable and well defined to allow for

a review for an allocation, and sufficiently

advanced such that they are likely to meet

the four-year placed-in-service deadline,

the Treasury Department and the IRS propose to require applicants to submit certain documentation and attestations when

applying for an allocation. Some requirements differ for FTM and BTM facilities

and other requirements differ by Category

and Additional Selection Criteria.

Under this proposed approach, applicants would be required to submit the

following:

1. Documentation and Attestations to be Submitted for all Facilities:

Proposed Document Requirement

An executed contract to purchase the facility, an executed contract to lease the

facility, or an executed power purchase agreement for the facility.

A copy of the final executed interconnection agreement, if applicable.9

Proposed Attestation Requirement

The applicant has site control through ownership, an executed lease contract,

site access agreement or similar agreement between the property owner and the

applicant.

The facility has obtained all applicable Federal, State, Tribal, and local nonministerial permits, or that the facility is not required to obtain such permits.

The applicant is in compliance with all Federal, State, and Tribal laws, including

consumer protection laws (as applicable).

The applicant has appropriately sized the facility (to meet no more than 110% of

historical customer load).

The applicant has appropriately sized the customer’s facility output share and has

based facility output share on historical customer load.

The applicant has inspected installation sites for suitability (for example, roofs).

FTM

BTM <= 1

MW AC

BTM > 1

MW AC

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

FTM

BTM <= 1

MW AC

BTM > 1

MW AC

Yes

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

If an interconnection agreement is not applicable to the facility (for example, due to utility ownership), this requirement is satisfied by a final written decision from a Public Utility

Commission, cooperative board, or other governing body with sufficient authority that financially authorizes the facility. If the facility is located in a market where the interconnection

agreement cannot be signed prior to construction of the facility or interconnection facilities, this requirement is satisfied by a signed conditional approval letter from the jurisdictional utility

and an affidavit from a senior corporate officer of the applicant (or someone with authority to bind the applicant) stating that an interconnection agreement cannot be executed until after

construction of the facility.

9

Bulletin No. 2023–26

1105

June 26, 2023

2. Documentation and Attestations to be Submitted for Certain Facilities Depending on Category and Additional Selection Criteria:

Proposed Document Requirement

Documentation demonstrating property will be installed on an

eligible residential building

Plans to ensure tenants receive required financial benefits

If applying under Additional Selection Criteria: Documentation

demonstrating applicant meets Ownership Criteria

Category 1

Category 2

Category 3

Category 4

No

No

Yes

No

No

No

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Proposed Attestation Requirement

Facility location is eligible10

Consumer disclosures informing customers of their legal rights and

protections have been provided to customers that have signed up and

will be provided to future customers

The applicant will ensure at least 50% of the financial benefits will be

provided to qualified households at 20% bill credit discount rate

If applying under additional Selection Criteria: Facility location is

eligible based on PPC/CEJST

Category 1

Yes

Category 2

Yes

Category 4

No

Yes

Yes

Category 3

No

Yes

(provided to

tenants)

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

F. Documentation and Attestations to be

Submitted when Placed in Service

The Treasury Department and the

IRS also propose to require facilities that

received a Capacity Limitation allocation to

report to the Department of Energy (DOE)

that the facility has been placed in service,

and to submit additional documentation

or complete additional attestations with

this reporting. At the time of application,

applicants would not necessarily be able to

demonstrate compliance with certain eligibility requirements, as the facility would

not yet be operating at that time. Requiring

placed in service reporting would allow for

final verification that the facilities that were

awarded a Capacity Limitation Allocation

have met certain eligibility requirements

under the Low-Income Communities

Bonus Credit Program.

The applicant-owner would submit

documentation or sign an attestation for

the following:

Proposed Attestation Requirement

Confirmation of material ownership and/or facility changes from application or that there has been no change from

the application.

Proposed Document Requirement

Permission to Operate (PTO) letter (or commissioning report verifying for off-grid facilities) that the facility has

been placed in service and the location of the facility being placed in service.

Final, Professional Engineer (PE) stamped as-built design plan, PTO letter with nameplate capacity listed, or other

documentation from an unrelated party verifying as-built nameplate capacity.

Benefits Sharing Agreement for qualified residential building projects between building owner and tenants

(including for facilities that are third party owned, additional sharing agreement between the facility owner and the

building owner).

Final list of households or other entities served with name, address, subscription share, and income status of

qualifying low-income households served, and the income verification method used.

Spreadsheet demonstrating the expected financial benefit to low-income subscribers to demonstrate the 20% bill

credit discount rate

10

Yes

Category

All

All

All

3

4

4

Facility location would be reviewed using latitude and longitude coordinates when possible.

June 26, 2023

1106

Bulletin No. 2023–26

G. Post-Allocation Compliance

1. Disqualification After Receiving an

Allocation

The Treasury Department and the IRS

recognize that because, under section

48(e)(4)(E)(i), an applicant has four years

after the date of an allocation of Capacity

Limitation to place eligible property in service, circumstances may change prior to

the property being placed in service such

that a facility is no longer eligible for the

allocation it received. In addition, to promote an efficient allocation process consistent with section 48(e)(4)(A), the Treasury

Department and the IRS want to discourage

material changes in project plans, such as

significant reductions in facility size that tie

up Capacity Limitation that could otherwise

be awarded to other qualified facilities.

Accordingly, the Treasury Department

and the IRS propose that a facility that

was awarded a Capacity Limitation allocation is disqualified from receiving that

allocation if prior to or upon the facility

being placed in service: (1) the location

where the facility will be placed in service changes; (2) the nameplate capacity of the facility increases such that it

exceeds the less than 5-megawatt alternating current output limitation provided

in section 48(e)(2)(A)(ii) or decreases

by the greater of 2 kW or 25 percent of

the Capacity Limitation awarded in the

allocation; (3) the facility cannot satisfy

the financial benefits requirements under

section 48(e)(2)(B)(ii) as planned (if

applicable) or cannot satisfy the financial

benefits requirements under section 48(e)

(2)(C) as planned (if applicable); (4) the

eligible property which is part of the facility that received the Capacity Limitation

allocation is not placed in service within

four years after the date the applicant

was notified of the allocation of Capacity

Limitation to the facility; or (5) the facility

received a Capacity Limitation allocation

based, in part, on meeting the Ownership

Criteria and ownership of the facility

changes prior to the facility being placed

in service such that the Ownership criteria

is no longer satisfied, unless a) the original

applicant retains an ownership interest in

the entity that owns the facility and b) the

Bulletin No. 2023–26

successor owner attests that after the five

year recapture period, the original applicant that met the Ownership Criteria will

become the owner of the facility or that

this original applicant will have the right

of first refusal.

2. Recapture of Section 48(e) Increase

Section 48(e)(5) requires the Secretary,

by regulations or other guidance, to provide rules for recapturing the benefit of

any section 48(e) Increase with respect to

any property which ceases to be property

eligible for such section 48(e) Increase

(but which does not cease to be investment

credit property within the meaning of section 50(a)). The period and percentage of

such recapture is determined under rules

similar to the rules of section 50(a). To

the extent provided by the Secretary, such

recapture may not apply with respect to any

property if, within 12 months after the date

the applicant becomes aware (or reasonably should have become aware) of such

property ceasing to be property eligible for

such section 48(e) Increase, the eligibility

of such property for such section 48(e)

Increase is restored. Such restoration of a

section 48(e) Increase is not available more

than once with respect to any facility.

The Treasury Department and the IRS

propose that the following circumstances

result in a recapture event if the property

ceases to be eligible for the increased

credit under section 48(e): (1) property

described in section 48(e)(2)(A)(iii)(II)

fails to provide financial benefits over the

5-year period after its original placed-inservice date; (2) property described under

section 48(e)(2)(B) ceases to allocate the

financial benefits equitably among the

occupants of the dwelling units, such as

not passing on to residents the required

net energy savings of the electricity;

(3) property described under section 48(e)

(2)(C) ceases to provide at least 50 percent of the financial benefits of the electricity produced to qualifying households

as described under section 48(e)(2)(C)

(i) or (ii), or fails to provide those households the required minimum 20 percent

bill credit discount rate; (4) for property

described under section 48(e)(2)(B), the

residential rental building the facility is

1107

a part of ceases to participate in a covered housing program or any other housing program described in section 48(e)

(2)(B)(i), if applicable; and (5) a facility

increases its output such that the facility’s output is 5 MW AC or greater, unless

the applicant can prove that the output

increase is not attributable to the original

facility but rather is output associated with

a new facility under the 80/20 Rule (the

cost of the new property plus the value of

the used property). See Rev. Rul. 94-31,

1994-1 C.B. 16.

Proposed Applicability Date

These proposed rules are proposed to

apply to taxable years ending on or after

the date that final rules adopting these proposed rules are published in the Federal

Register.

Special Analyses

I. Regulatory Planning and Review –

Economic Analysis

Executive Orders 13563 and 12866

direct agencies to assess costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives

and, if regulation is necessary, to select

regulatory approaches that maximize net

benefits (including potential economic,

environmental, public health and safety

effects, distributive impacts, and equity).

Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the

importance of quantifying both costs and

benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.

These proposed rules have been designated by the Office of Management

and Budget’s Office of Information

and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) as subject to review under Executive Order

12866 pursuant to the Memorandum of

Agreement (April 11, 2018) between the

Treasury Department and the Office of

Management and Budget (OMB) regarding review of tax rules. OIRA has determined that the proposed rulemaking is

significant and subject to review under

Executive Order 12866 and section 1(b)

of the Memorandum of Agreement.

Accordingly, the proposed rules have been

reviewed by OMB.

June 26, 2023

II. Paperwork Reduction Act

The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

(44 U.S.C. 3501-3520) (PRA) requires

that a Federal agency obtain the approval

of OMB before collecting information

from the public, whether such collection

of information is mandatory, voluntary,

or required to obtain or retain a benefit.

The collections of information in these

proposed regulations contain reporting

and recordkeeping requirements that

are required to obtain the section 48(e)

Increase. This information in the collections of information would generally be

used by the IRS and DOE for tax compliance purposes and by taxpayers to facilitate proper reporting and compliance. A

Federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond

to, a collection of information unless the

collection of information displays a valid

control number.

The recordkeeping requirements mentioned within this proposed regulation

are considered general tax records under

section 1.6001-1(e). These records are

required for IRS to validate that taxpayers have met the regulatory requirements

and are entitled to receive section 48(e)

Increase. For PRA purposes, general tax

records are already approved by OMB

under 1545-0123 for business filers, 15450074 for individual filers, and 1545-0047

for tax-exempt organizations.

The proposed regulation also mentions

reporting requirements related to providing attestations and supporting documentation for initial application, supplemental

documentation for specific facilities, and

to confirm a facility is placed in service

as detailed in this NPRM. These attestations and documentation would allow IRS

to allocate Capacity Limitation and ensure

taxpayers keep and maintain compliance

for the credits. To assist with the collections of information, the DOE will provide certain administration services for the

Low-Income Communities Bonus Credit

Program. Among other things, the DOE

will establish a website portal to review

the applications for eligibility criteria and

will provide recommendations to the IRS

regarding the selection of applications

for an allocation of Capacity Limitation.

These collection requirements will be

submitted to the Office of Management

June 26, 2023

and Budget (OMB) under 1545-NEW

for review and approval in accordance

with 5 CFR 1320.11. The likely respondents are business filers, individual filers, and tax-exempt organization filers. A

summary of paperwork burden estimates

for the application and attestations is as

follows:

Estimated number of respondents:

70,000

Estimated burden per response: 60

minutes

Estimated frequency of response: 1 for

initial applications, 1 for follow-up documentation, and 1 for projects placed in

service.

Estimated total burden hours: 210,000

burden hours

IRS will be soliciting feedback on the

collection requirements for the application and attestations. Commenters are

strongly encouraged to submit public

comments electronically. Written comments and recommendations for the

proposed information collection should

be sent to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/

PRAMain, with copies to the Internal

Revenue Service. Find this particular information collection by selecting

“Currently under Review - Open for

Public Comments” then by using the

search function. Submit electronic submissions for the proposed information

collection to the IRS via email at pra.comments@irs.gov (indicate REG-11041223 on the Subject line). Comments on

the collection of information should be

received by June 30, 2023. Comments

are specifically requested concerning:

Whether the proposed collection of

information is necessary for the proper

performance of the functions of the IRS,

including whether the information will

have practical utility. The accuracy of

the estimated burden associated with

the proposed collection of information.

How the quality, utility, and clarity of

the information to be collected may be

enhanced. How the burden of complying

with the proposed collection of information may be minimized, including through

the application of automated collection

techniques or other forms of information technology; and estimates of capital

or start-up costs and costs of operation,

maintenance, and purchase of services to

provide information.

1108

III. Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5

U.S.C. 601 et seq.) (RFA) imposes certain requirements with respect to Federal

rules that are subject to the notice and

comment requirements of section 553(b)

of the Administrative Procedure Act (5

U.S.C. 551 et seq.) and that are likely to

have a significant economic impact on

a substantial number of small entities.

Unless an agency determines that a proposal is not likely to have a significant

economic impact on a substantial number

of small entities, section 603 of the RFA

requires the agency to present an initial

regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA)

of the proposed rule. The Treasury

Department and the IRS have not determined whether the proposed rule would

likely have a significant economic impact

on a substantial number of small entities.

This determination requires further study

and an IRFA is provided in these proposed

regulations. The Treasury Department

and the IRS invite comments on both the

number of entities affected and the economic impact on small entities.

Pursuant to section 7805(f), this notice

of proposed rulemaking has been submitted to the Chief Counsel of Advocacy of

the Small Business Administration for

comment on its impact on small business.

1. Need for and Objectives of the Rule

The proposed regulations would provide guidance for purposes of participation in the program to allocate the

environmental justice solar and wind

capacity limitation under section 48(e)

for the Low-Income Communities Bonus

Credit Program. The proposed rule is

expected to encourage applicants to

invest in solar and wind energy. Thus, the

Treasury Department and the IRS intend

and expect that the proposed rule will

deliver benefits across the economy and

environment that will beneficially impact

various industries.

2. Affected Small Entities

The Small Business Administration

estimates in its 2018 Small Business

Profile that 99.9 percent of United States

businesses meet its definition of a small

Bulletin No. 2023–26

business. The applicability of these proposed regulations does not depend on

the size of the business, as defined by

the Small Business Administration. As

described more fully in the preamble to

this proposed regulation and in this IRFA,

these rules may affect a variety of different businesses across serval different

industries.

The Treasury Department and the IRS

expect to receive more information on

the impact on small businesses through

comments on this proposed rule and again

when participation in the Low-Income

Communities Bonus Credit Program

commences.

3. Impact of the Rules

The recordkeeping and reporting

requirements would increase for applicants that participate in the Low-Income

Communities Bonus Credit Program.

Although the Treasury Department and

the IRS do not have sufficient data to

determine precisely the likely extent of

the increased costs of compliance, the

estimated burden of complying with the

recordkeeping and reporting requirements

are described in the Paperwork Reduction

Act section of the preamble.

4. Alternatives Considered

The Treasury Department and the IRS

considered alternatives to the proposed

regulations. For example, the Treasury

Department and the IRS considered

exclusively using a lottery system for all

over-subscribed categories, rather than

creating reservations for facilities meeting additional selection criteria. Although

a lottery system may ultimately need to

be used for an oversubscribed category,

the Treasury Department and the IRS

decided that it was important to propose

reserving Capacity Limitation for facilities that meet certain additional selection

criteria that further the policy goals of the

Low-Income Communities Bonus Credit

Program.

Additionally,

when

considering

how to define “in connection with,”

the Treasury Department and the IRS

were mindful that the statute requires

the energy storage technology to be

Bulletin No. 2023–26

installed in connection with a qualifying solar or wind facility to be eligible

for an increase in the energy percentage used to calculate the amount of the

section 48 credit. Different alternatives

were considered on how to address this

definition. For example, the Treasury

Department and the IRS considered but

ultimately decided not to incorporate

the proposed safe harbor (deeming the

energy storage technology to be charged

at least 50 percent by the facility if the

power rating of the energy storage technology is less than 2 times the capacity

rating of the connected wind or solar) as

part of the general rule to define “in connection with.” The proposed general rule

instead requires the energy storage technology to have a sufficient nexus to the

other eligible property because it is part

of the single project and is significantly

charged by the eligible property.

Another example where different

alternatives were considered was with

respect to application materials. Section

48(e)(4)(A) directs the Secretary to provide procedures to allow for an efficient

allocation process, and section 48(e)

(4)(E)(i) allows an applicant up to

four years after receiving a Capacity

Limitation allocation to place eligible

property into service. Alternatives were

considered on how best to balance these

statutory requirements, considering practical issues for taxpayers and residents

as well as the traditional structure and

arrangement of these solar and wind

transactions, including considerations on

the type of facility (BTM or FTM) and

the capacity of the facility. Among other

things, the Treasury Department and the

IRS considered whether an application

for an interconnection agreement or an

executed interconnection agreement

should be required as part of the application materials. The proposed regulations

are based on the view that the executed

interconnection agreement, if applicable,

is an essential documentation to demonstrate sufficient project maturity.

Additionally, the Treasury Department

and the IRS considered a variety of bill

credit discounts for Category 4 qualified

low-income benefit project facilities. The

bill credit discounts considered included

10 percent, 15 percent, or 20 percent.

1109

Alternatively, the Treasury Department

and the IRS considered the option of a

range of discounts from 10 percent to

20 percent from which applicants could

choose which discount rate to provide

low-income customers. However, to

ensure that low-income customers are

receiving meaningful financial benefits,

the Treasury Department and the IRS

decided to propose a 20 percent discount.

5. Duplicative, Overlapping, or

Conflicting Federal Rules

The proposed rule would not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any relevant Federal rules. As discussed in the

Explanation of Provisions, the proposed

rules would merely provide requirements,

procedures, and definitions related to the

Low-Income Communities Bonus Credit

Program. The Treasury Department and

the IRS invite input from interested members of the public about identifying and

avoiding overlapping, duplicative, or conflicting requirements.

IV. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates

Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) requires

that agencies assess anticipated costs and

benefits and take certain other actions

before issuing a final rule that includes any

Federal mandate that may result in expenditures in any one year by a State, local, or

Tribal government, in the aggregate, or by

the private sector, of $100 million in 1995

dollars, updated annually for inflation.

This proposed rule does not include any

Federal mandate that may result in expenditures by State, local, or Tribal governments, or by the private sector in excess of

that threshold.

V. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)

prohibits an agency from publishing any

rule that has federalism implications if

the rule either imposes substantial, direct

compliance costs on State and local governments, and is not required by statute,

or preempts State law, unless the agency

meets the consultation and funding requirements of section 6 of the Executive order.

June 26, 2023

These regulations do not have federalism

implications and do not impose substantial

direct compliance costs on State and local

governments or preempt State law within

the meaning of the Executive order.

proposed rules. Any electronic or paper

comments submitted will be made available at https://www.regulations.gov or

upon request.

Comments

Statement of Availability of IRS

Documents

Before these proposed rules are

adopted as final rules, consideration will

be given to comments that are submitted

timely to the IRS as prescribed in this preamble under the ADDRESSES section.

The Treasury Department and the IRS

request comments on all aspects of the

Guidance cited in this preamble is published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin and

is available from the Superintendent of

Documents, U.S. Government Publishing

Office, Washington, DC 20402, or by visiting the IRS website at https://www.irs.

gov.

June 26, 2023

1110

Drafting Information

The principal author of these proposed rules is the Office of the Associate

Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special

Industries), IRS. However, other personnel from the Treasury Department and the

IRS participated in their development.

Douglas W. O’Donnell,

Deputy Commissioner for Services

and Enforcement.

(Filed by the Office of the Federal Register May 31,

2023, 8:45a.m., and published in the issue of the

Federal Register for June 1, 2023, 88 FR 35791)

Bulletin No. 2023–26

Definition of Terms

Revenue rulings and revenue procedures

(hereinafter referred to as “rulings”) that

have an effect on previous rulings use the

following defined terms to describe the

­effect:

Amplified describes a situation where

no change is being made in a prior published position, but the prior position is

being extended to apply to a variation of

the fact situation set forth therein. Thus, if

an earlier ruling held that a principle applied to A, and the new ruling holds that

the same principle also applies to B, the

earlier ruling is amplified. (Compare with

modified, below).

Clarified is used in those instances

where the language in a prior ruling is being made clear because the language has

caused, or may cause, some confusion. It

is not used where a position in a prior ruling is being changed.

Distinguished describes a situation

where a ruling mentions a previously published ruling and points out an essential

difference between them.

Modified is used where the substance

of a previously published position is being

changed. Thus, if a prior ruling held that a

principle applied to A but not to B, and the

new ruling holds that it applies to both A

and B, the prior ruling is modified because

it corrects a published position. (Compare

with amplified and clarified, above).

Obsoleted describes a previously published ruling that is not considered determinative with respect to future transactions.

This term is mos

This text is long and has been trimmed here. Open the source document for the complete record.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.