Bulletin No. 2023–21
Agency decision
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
HIGHLIGHTS
OF THIS ISSUE
Bulletin No. 2023–21
May 22, 2023
These synopses are intended only as aids to the reader in
identifying the subject matter covered. They may not be
relied upon as authoritative interpretations.
ADMINISTRATIVE
Notice 2023-36, page 855.
The Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service invite the public to submit recommendations for items to
be included on the 2023-2024 Priority Guidance Plan.
EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS
Announcement 2023-15, page 856.
Revocation of IRC 501(c)(3) Organizations for failure to meet
the code section requirements. Contributions made to the
Finding Lists begin on page ii.
organizations by individual donors are no longer deductible
under IRC 170(c).
ADMINISTRATIVE
REG-124064-19, page 857.
Section 367(d) imposes deemed income inclusions on a
United States person who transfers intangible property to a
related foreign corporation in certain transactions. These proposed regulations, in certain cases, would terminate a United
States person’s deemed income inclusions from a previous
transfer of intangible property when the intangible property
is subsequently repatriated to certain United States persons.
The IRS Mission
Provide America’s taxpayers top-quality service by helping
them understand and meet their tax responsibilities and
enforce the law with integrity and fairness to all.
Introduction
The Internal Revenue Bulletin is the authoritative instrument
of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for announcing official rulings and procedures of the Internal Revenue Service
and for publishing Treasury Decisions, Executive Orders, Tax
Conventions, legislation, court decisions, and other items of
general interest. It is published weekly.
It is the policy of the Service to publish in the Bulletin all
substantive rulings necessary to promote a uniform application of the tax laws, including all rulings that supersede,
revoke, modify, or amend any of those previously published
in the Bulletin. All published rulings apply retroactively unless
otherwise indicated. Procedures relating solely to matters
of internal management are not published; however, statements of internal practices and procedures that affect the
rights and duties of taxpayers are published.
Revenue rulings represent the conclusions of the Service
on the application of the law to the pivotal facts stated in
the revenue ruling. In those based on positions taken in rulings to taxpayers or technical advice to Service field offices,
identifying details and information of a confidential nature are
deleted to prevent unwarranted invasions of privacy and to
comply with statutory requirements.
Rulings and procedures reported in the Bulletin do not have the
force and effect of Treasury Department Regulations, but they
may be used as precedents. Unpublished rulings will not be
relied on, used, or cited as precedents by Service personnel in
the disposition of other cases. In applying published rulings and
procedures, the effect of subsequent legislation, regulations,
court decisions, rulings, and procedures must be considered,
and Service personnel and others concerned are cautioned
against reaching the same conclusions in other cases unless
the facts and circumstances are substantially the same.
The Bulletin is divided into four parts as follows:
Part I.—1986 Code.
This part includes rulings and decisions based on provisions
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Part II.—Treaties and Tax Legislation.
This part is divided into two subparts as follows: Subpart A,
Tax Conventions and Other Related Items, and Subpart B,
Legislation and Related Committee Reports.
Part III.—Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous.
To the extent practicable, pertinent cross references to these
subjects are contained in the other Parts and Subparts. Also
included in this part are Bank Secrecy Act Administrative
Rulings. Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rulings are issued
by the Department of the Treasury’s Office of the Assistant
Secretary (Enforcement).
Part IV.—Items of General Interest.
This part includes notices of proposed rulemakings, disbarment and suspension lists, and announcements.
The last Bulletin for each month includes a cumulative index
for the matters published during the preceding months. These
monthly indexes are cumulated on a semiannual basis, and are
published in the last Bulletin of each semiannual period.
The contents of this publication are not copyrighted and may be reprinted freely. A citation of the Internal Revenue Bulletin as the source would be appropriate.
May 22, 2023
Bulletin No. 2023–21
Part III
Public Recommendations
Invited on Items to be
Included on the 2023-2024
Priority Guidance Plan
Notice 2023-36
The Department of the Treasury
(Treasury Department) and the Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) invite the public to
submit recommendations for items to be
included on the 2023-2024 Priority Guidance Plan.
The Treasury Department’s Office of
Tax Policy and the IRS use the Priority
Guidance Plan each year to identify and
prioritize the tax issues that should be
addressed through regulations, revenue
rulings, revenue procedures, notices, and
other published administrative guidance.
The 2023-2024 Priority Guidance Plan
will identify guidance projects that the
Treasury Department and the IRS intend
to actively work on as priorities during the
period from July 1, 2023, through June 30,
2024.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
recognize the importance of public input
in formulating a Priority Guidance Plan
that focuses resources on guidance items
that are most important to taxpayers and
tax administration. Published guidance
plays an important role in increasing
voluntary compliance by helping to clarify ambiguous areas of the tax law. The
published guidance process is most successful if the Treasury Department and
the IRS have the benefit of the experience and knowledge of taxpayers and
practitioners who must apply the rules
implementing the tax laws.
This solicitation reflects an emphasis
on taxpayer engagement with the Treasury Department and the IRS through a
variety of channels, consistent with the
directive of the Taxpayer First Act, Pub.
L. 116-25, 133 Stat. 981.
Bulletin No. 2023–21
In reviewing recommendations and
selecting additional projects for inclusion
on the 2023-2024 Priority Guidance Plan,
the Treasury Department and the IRS will
consider the following:
1. Whether the recommended guidance
resolves significant issues relevant to
a broad class of taxpayers;
2. Whether the recommended guidance
reduces controversy and lessens the
burden on taxpayers or the IRS;
3. Whether the recommended guidance
relates to recently enacted legislation,
such as the Inflation Reduction Act of
2022, Pub. L. No. 117-169 (August
16, 2022);
4. Whether
the
recommendation
involves existing regulations or other
guidance that is outdated, unnecessary, ineffective, insufficient, or
unnecessarily burdensome and that
should be modified, streamlined,
expanded, replaced, or withdrawn;
5. Whether the recommended guidance
promotes sound tax administration;
6. Whether the IRS can administer the
recommended guidance on a uniform
basis; and
7. Whether the recommended guidance
can be drafted in a manner that will
enable taxpayers to easily understand
and apply the guidance.
Please submit recommendations for
guidance by Friday, June 9, 2023, for
possible inclusion on the original 20232024 Priority Guidance Plan. Taxpayers
may, however, submit recommendations
for guidance at any time during the
year. The Treasury Department and the
IRS will update the 2023-2024 Priority Guidance Plan periodically to reflect
additional guidance that the Treasury
Department and the IRS intend to publish
or have published during the plan year.
The periodic updates allow the Treasury
Department and the IRS to respond in a
timely manner to the need for additional
guidance that may arise during the plan
year.
855
Taxpayers are not required to submit
recommendations for guidance in any particular format. Taxpayers should, however,
briefly describe the recommended guidance
and explain the need for the guidance. In
addition, taxpayers may include an analysis of how the issue should be resolved. For
recommendations to modify, streamline,
or withdraw existing regulations or other
guidance, taxpayers should explain how the
changes would reduce taxpayer cost and/or
burden or benefit tax administration. It would
be helpful if taxpayers suggesting more than
one guidance project prioritize the projects
by order of importance. If a large number
of projects are being suggested, it would
be helpful if the projects were grouped by
subject matter and then in terms of high,
medium, or low priority. Requests for guidance in the form of petitions for rulemaking
will be considered with other recommendations for guidance in accordance with the
considerations described in this notice.
Taxpayers are strongly encouraged to
submit recommendations for guidance
electronically via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov (type
IRS-2023-0022 in the search field on the
regulations.gov homepage to find this
notice and submit recommendations).
Taxpayers submitting recommendations
by mail should send them to:
Internal Revenue Service
Attn: CC:PA:LPD:PR (Notice
2023-36) Room 5203
P.O. Box 7604
Ben Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044
All recommendations for guidance
submitted by the public in response to this
notice will be available for public inspection and copying in their entirety. For
further information regarding this notice,
contact Emily M. Lesniak of the Office of
the Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure
and Administration) at (202) 317-5409
(not a toll-free number).
May 22, 2023
Part IV
Deletions From Cumulative
List of Organizations,
Contributions to Which are
Deductible Under Section
170 of the Code
Announcement 2023-15
The Internal Revenue Service has
revoked its determination that the organization listed below qualifies as an
organization described in sections 501(c)
(3) and 170(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986.
Generally, the IRS will not disallow
deductions for contributions made to a
listed organization on or before the date
of announcement in the Internal Revenue
Bulletin that an organization no longer
qualifies. However, the IRS is not precluded from disallowing a deduction for
any contributions made after an organization ceases to qualify under section 170(c)
(2) if the organization has not timely filed
a suit for declaratory judgment under section 7428 and if the contributor (1) had
knowledge of the revocation of the ruling
or determination letter, (2) was aware that
such revocation was imminent, or (3) was
in part responsible for or was aware of the
activities or omissions of the organization
that brought about this revocation.
If on the other hand a suit for declaratory judgment has been timely filed,
contributions from individuals and organizations described in section 170(c)(2)
that are otherwise allowable will continue
to be deductible. Protection under section
7428(c) would begin on 04/27/2023 and
would end on the date the court first determines the organization is not described
in section 170(c)(2) as more particularly
set for in section 7428(c)(1). For individual contributors, the maximum deduction
protected is $1,000, with a husband and
wife treated as one contributor. This benefit is not extended to any individual, in
whole or in part, for the acts or omissions
of the organization that were the basis for
revocation.
The Following organization is no longer qualified as an organization exempt
from income tax under Internal Revenue
Code (the “Code”) Section 501(a) as an
organization described in Section 501(c)
(3) of the Code:
NAME OF ORGANIZATION
EFFECTIVE DATE OF REVOCATION
Family Office Foundation
01/01/2017
May 22, 2023
856
LOCATION
Costa Mesa, CA
Bulletin No. 2023–21
Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking
Section 367(d) Rules for
Certain Repatriations of
Intangible Property
REG-124064-19
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service
(IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
SUMMARY: This document contains
proposed regulations that, in certain cases,
would terminate the continued application
of certain tax provisions arising from a
previous transfer of intangible property to
a foreign corporation when the intangible
property is repatriated to certain United
States persons. The proposed regulations
would affect certain United States persons that previously transferred intangible
property to a foreign corporation.
DATES: Written or electronic comments
and requests for a public hearing must be
received by July 3, 2023. Requests for a
public hearing must be submitted as prescribed in the “Comments and Requests
for a Public Hearing” section.
ADDRESSES: Commenters are strongly
encouraged to submit public comments
electronically. Submit electronic submissions via the Federal eRulemaking Portal
at https://www.regulations.gov (indicate
IRS and REG-124064-19) by following
the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal, comments cannot
be edited or withdrawn. The Department
of the Treasury (the “Treasury Department”) and the IRS will publish for public
availability any comments submitted electronically or on paper to its public docket.
Send paper submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-124064-19), room 5203,
Internal Revenue Service, PO Box 7604,
Ben Franklin Station, Washington, D.C.
20044.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT: Concerning the proposed
regulations other than §1.904-4, Chadwick Rowland and L. Ulysses Chatman,
(202) 317-6937; concerning §1.904-4,
Jeffrey L. Parry, (202) 317-6936; concerning submissions of comments and requests
for a public hearing, Vivian Hayes at (202)
317-6901 (not toll-free numbers) or by
sending an email to publichearings@irs.
gov (preferred).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
I. Sections 367(d) and 6038B
A. Statute
Section 367(d) of the Internal Revenue
Code (the “Code”) provides rules for outbound transfers of intangible property (as
defined in section 367(d)(4)) by a United
States person (a “U.S. person”) to a foreign
corporation.1 Section 367(d)(1) provides
that, except as provided in regulations, if
a U.S. person (a “U.S. transferor”) transfers any intangible property to a foreign
corporation (the “transferee foreign corporation”) in an exchange described in
section 351 or 361, section 367(d) (and
not section 367(a)) applies to the transfer.
Section 367(d)(2)(A) provides that a U.S.
transferor that transfers intangible property subject to section 367(d) is treated
as having sold the intangible property in
exchange for payments that are contingent
upon the productivity, use, or disposition
of the intangible property.
Specifically, the U.S. transferor is
treated as receiving amounts that reasonably reflect the amounts that would have
been received annually in the form of such
payments over the useful life of the intangible property (an “annual inclusion”), or,
in the case of a direct or indirect disposition of the intangible property following
the transfer, at the time of the disposition
(a “lump-sum inclusion,” and each inclu-
sion, a “section 367(d) inclusion”). See
section 367(d)(2)(A)(ii)(I) and (II). The
amounts taken into account by the U.S.
transferor must be commensurate with
the income attributable to the transferred
intangible property. See section 367(d)(2)
(A) (flush language). Section 367(d)(2)(B)
provides that, for purposes of chapter 1 of
subtitle A of the Code, the earnings and
profits (“E&P”) of the transferee foreign
corporation are reduced by the amount
required to be included in the income of
the U.S. transferor as a section 367(d)
inclusion.
Section 6038B(a)(1)(A) grants the
Secretary regulatory authority to require
information reporting related to certain
outbound transfers of property by a U.S.
person to a foreign corporation, including rules related to outbound transfers
of intangible property. Section 6038B(c)
generally provides rules for failures to
furnish the required information.
B. Legislative history
Congress enacted section 367(d) in
substantially its present form to address
“specific and unique problems” that exist
with respect to outbound transfers of
intangible property. See S. Rep. No 169,
98th Cong., 2d Sess., at 360 (1984); H.R.
Rept. No. 432, 98th Cong., 2d Sess., at
1315 (1984). Congress generally identified the cause of such problems as follows:
[T]ransferor U.S. companies hope to
reduce their U.S. taxable income by
deducting substantial research and
experimentation expenses associated
with the development of the transferred intangible and, by transferring
the intangible to a foreign corporation
at the point of profitability, to ensure
deferral of U.S. tax on the profits generated by the intangible.
Id.
Congress also explained that, after
the initial outbound transfer of intangible property, these problems could arise
by reason of certain subsequent direct
or indirect dispositions of the intangible property. See S. Rept. No 169, 98th
Cong., 2d Sess., at 368 (1984) (“[G]ain on
For purposes of these regulations, a U.S. person is defined in §1.367(a)-1(d)(1), which defines a U.S. person, in part, by reference to persons described in section 7701(a)(30). Section
7701(a)(30) defines a U.S. person as a citizen or resident of the United States, a domestic partnership, a domestic corporation, and certain estates and trusts.
1
Bulletin No. 2023–21
857
May 22, 2023
a disposition of stock in a [transferee foreign corporation] will be treated as being
attributable, in part, to the transferred
intangible . . . ; similarly, upon a disposition of the intangible by the [transferee
foreign corporation], the U.S. transferor
will be treated as receiving a payment
[with respect to that intangible]”).
C. Regulations
1. In general
Temporary regulations were published
under sections 367(d) and 6038B(a)(1)
(A) on May 16, 1986 (51 FR 17936).
Proposed regulations were also published
under these sections on September 16,
2015 (80 FR 55568), and the related final
regulations were published on December
16, 2016 (81 FR 91012) (these final regulations and the temporary regulations,
together, the “section 367(d) regulations”).
Consistent with section 367(d) and
its legislative history, the section 367(d)
regulations provide rules for determining
a U.S. transferor’s section 367(d) inclusion and a transferee foreign corporation’s
required adjustments for its deemed payment to the U.S. transferor. In general,
the U.S. transferor takes into account an
annual inclusion over the useful life of
the intangible property, as determined in
accordance with the provisions of section 482 and regulations thereunder. See
§1.367(d)-1T(c)(1). For this purpose,
the useful life is the entire period during
which exploitation of the intangible property is reasonably anticipated to affect the
determination of taxable income, as of the
time of transfer. See §1.367(d)-1(c)(3)(i).
Additionally, for purposes of chapter
1 of subtitle A of the Code, the transferee
foreign corporation reduces its E&P by the
amount of the deemed payment to the U.S.
transferor, and, for purposes of subpart F
of part III of subchapter N of chapter 1
(“subpart F”), the transferee foreign corporation may treat the deemed payment
as, in relevant part, an expense properly
allocated and apportioned to gross income
subject to subpart F in accordance with the
provisions of §§1.954-1(c) and 1.861-8.
See §1.367(d)-1T(c)(2); see also §1.951A2(c)(2)(ii) (providing similar treatment for
purposes of determining tested income or
tested loss of a controlled foreign corporation (as defined in section 957, a “CFC”)).
2. Subsequent transfer rules
If the U.S. transferor subsequently
transfers the stock of the transferee foreign corporation it received in exchange
for the intangible property, or if the
transferee foreign corporation subsequently transfers the intangible property
it received in exchange for its stock, the
section 367(d) regulations provide different rules based on whether the transferee
in the subsequent transfer is a U.S. person or a foreign person and whether the
transferee is a related person or an unrelated person as to the U.S. transferor.
See §1.367(d)-1T(d), (e), and (f); see
also Notice 2012-39, 2012-31 I.R.B. 95
(describing regulations that would apply
in lieu of §1.367(d)-1T(c), (d), (e), and
(g) with respect to certain outbound transfers of intangible property by a domestic
corporation to a foreign corporation in an
exchange described in section 361(a) or
(b)). These subsequent transfer rules treat
certain subsequent transfers of the stock
of the transferee foreign corporation or
the intangible property as a disposition of
the intangible property (within the meaning of section 367(d)(2)(A)(ii)(II)) that
can accelerate a section 367(d) inclusion,
and corresponding adjustments, by reason
of the deemed payment. See, for example,
§1.367(d)-1T(d).
If the U.S. transferor subsequently
transfers stock of the transferee foreign
corporation to a related U.S. person (a
“successor U.S. transferor”), the transfer
is not treated as a disposition of the intangible property, and the successor U.S.
transferor is treated as receiving a right
to receive a proportionate share (determined under §1.367(d)-1T(e)(4)) of the
annual inclusion that would otherwise
be taken into account by the U.S. transferor under §1.367(d)-1T(c). Therefore,
the successor U.S. transferor is required
to take into account that proportionate
share of the annual section 367(d) inclusion over the remaining useful life of the
intangible property, and the transferee
foreign corporation takes into account
any adjustments from the successor U.S.
transferor’s annual section 367(d) inclusion. See §1.367(d)-1T(e)(1) and (2). If
the U.S. transferor transfers a portion of
the stock of the transferee foreign corporation to one or more successor U.S.
transferors and retains a portion of the
stock of the transferee foreign corporation, the U.S. transferor continues to take
into account the portion of the annual section 367(d) inclusion that is not taken into
account by a successor U.S. transferor.2
See §1.367(d)-1T(c)(1).
Alternatively, if a U.S. transferor subsequently transfers stock of the transferee
foreign corporation to an unrelated person
(U.S. or foreign), the transfer is treated
as an indirect disposition of the transferred intangible property that triggers a
lump-sum section 367(d) inclusion. As a
result, the U.S. transferor recognizes gain
immediately (determined based on the fair
market value of the intangible property
at the time of the indirect disposition and
the U.S. transferor’s adjusted basis in the
intangible property at the time of the initial section 367(d) transfer), as if the U.S.
transferor had sold the intangible property
to the unrelated person, and the transferee
foreign corporation makes corresponding adjustments. See §1.367(d)-1T(d);
see also §1.367(d)-1T(e)(1)(iii) and (e)
(2) (providing pro rata rules for cases in
which there is a subsequent transfer of
stock of the transferee foreign corporation
to both an unrelated person(s) and a successor U.S. transferor(s)).
If the transferee foreign corporation
subsequently transfers the intangible property to a related person, notwithstanding
that such subsequent transfer is a direct
disposition of the intangible property, the
section 367(d) regulations do not trigger a
lump-sum inclusion but rather provide that
“the requirement that the U.S. transferor
recognize gain under [§1.367(d)-1T(c)
(1) or (e)(1)] shall not be affected” by
such transfer. See §1.367(d)-1T(f)(3). The
regulation does not distinguish between a
The section 367(d) regulations apply separately as to each U.S. person treated as a U.S. transferor. Any reference to a “U.S. transferor” in the remainder of this Preamble includes a reference to a “successor U.S. transferor” unless otherwise noted.
2
May 22, 2023
858
Bulletin No. 2023–21
related U.S. or foreign person and provides
further that “for purposes of any required
adjustments, and of any accounts receivable created under [§1.367(d)-1T(g)] the
related person that receives the intangible
property shall be treated as the transferee
foreign corporation.” See §1.367(d)-1T(f)
(3).
Conversely, if the transferee foreign
corporation subsequently transfers the
intangible property to an unrelated person (U.S. or foreign), the U.S. transferor
recognizes gain immediately (in the form
of a lump-sum inclusion determined using
the U.S. transferor’s former adjusted
basis in the intangible property immediately before the transfer to the transferee
foreign corporation and a partial annual
inclusion), and the transferee foreign
corporation makes corresponding adjustments. See §1.367(d)-1T(f)(1) and (2).
As described in the preceding
paragraphs of this part I.C.2 of the Background, the consequences of a direct or
indirect transfer of the intangible property
following an initial outbound transfer of
that property depend, in relevant part, on
whether the transferee in the subsequent
transfer is a related or unrelated person.
In determining relatedness, the section
367(d) regulations lower certain thresholds that normally apply in determining
whether persons are related, to preserve
the application of section 367(d) for
cases in which a U.S. transferor retains
a sufficient nexus to the intangible property after the subsequent transfer. See
§1.367(d)-1T(h)(2). Thus, the section
367(d) regulations generally preserve
the application of the annual inclusion
stream upon a subsequent transfer, but if
the transfer sufficiently severs the U.S.
transferor’s nexus to the intangible property, the transfer is treated as a direct
or indirect disposition of the intangible
property, as applicable, and the section
367(d) regulations provide that the U.S.
transferor has a lump-sum inclusion and
a partial annual inclusion.
II. Application of Section 367(d) to
Repatriations of Intangible Property
The Treasury Department and the IRS
are aware that some taxpayers are evaluating whether to repatriate to the United
States intangible property that was previ-
Bulletin No. 2023–21
ously transferred to a foreign corporation
in a transaction subject to section 367(d).
Because, in relevant part, the section
367(d) regulations do not distinguish
between subsequent transfers of intangible property made to a related U.S. or
foreign person, as described in part I.C.2
of this Background, there is a concern
that, in certain cases, the section 367(d)
regulations can inappropriately require
the U.S. transferor to continue recognizing an annual section 367(d) inclusion
even if the subsequent transfer is to a
related U.S. person that will recognize
the income derived from the intangible
property. Specifically, the section 367(d)
regulations do not terminate the required
annual section 367(d) inclusion even if
the intangible property is transferred to a
related U.S. person that is subject to U.S.
taxation on income earned from the intangible property. As a result, if the section
367(d) inclusion stream continues, the
income earned from the intangible property would be subject to excessive U.S.
taxation. Because the continued application of section 367(d) in these situations
could result in excessive U.S. taxation and
may disincentivize certain repatriations of
intangible property, the Treasury Department and the IRS are proposing, in certain
cases, to terminate the application of section 367(d) if the intangible property is
repatriated to certain U.S. persons that are
subject to U.S. taxation with respect to the
income derived from the intangible property. The term “repatriation” is, unless
otherwise noted, used in this Preamble to
generally denote a subsequent transfer of
the intangible property to the U.S. transferor or a U.S. person related to the U.S.
transferor.
Where the U.S. transferor is a member
of a consolidated group, and the intangible property is repatriated to another
member of the same consolidated group
(“transferee member”), some taxpayers
have asked whether the U.S. transferor’s
annual inclusions could be redetermined
to be excluded from gross income under
§1.1502-13(c)(6)(ii)(A) (the “Automatic
Relief Rule”). For that to occur, the transferee member’s corresponding item must
be a deduction or loss that is “permanently
and explicitly disallowed” under another
provision of the Code or regulations. See
§1.1502-13(c)(6)(ii)(A). However, the
859
U.S. transferor’s annual inclusions may
not be excluded under the Automatic
Relief Rule, because §1.367(d)-1T(c)(2)
does not explicitly disallow the transferee
member’s deduction for its expense tied
to its deemed payment. Rather, in appropriate factual situations, the IRS has ruled
that the U.S. transferor’s annual inclusions may be excluded from income under
the Commissioner’s discretionary rule of
§1.1502-13(c)(6)(ii)(D).
To address repatriations of intangible property more generally, and not just
those where the related U.S. person is a
member of the same consolidated group
as the U.S. transferor (and to avoid the
need to obtain a ruling in such a case),
these proposed regulations provide rules
that more broadly apply section 367(d)
to the repatriation of intangible property,
including the circumstances in which the
application of section 367(d) is terminated
(these rules, collectively, the “section
367(d) repatriation rules”).
III. Section 904(d) Foreign Branch
Income
Section 904 provides for the application of separate foreign tax credit
limitations to certain categories of income
under section 904(d). One of those categories is the separate category for foreign
branch income under section 904(d)(1)
(B). Section 1.904-4(f)(1)(i) provides that
foreign branch category income means the
gross income of a United States person (as
defined in section 7701(a)(30), other than
a pass-through entity) that is attributable
to foreign branches (as defined in §1.9044(f)(3)(vii)) held directly or indirectly
through disregarded entities by the United
States person.
In general, §1.904-4(f)(2)(vi)(A)
adjusts the attribution of gross income
when disregarded payments are made
between a foreign branch and a foreign branch owner, or between foreign
branches. Disregarded remittances or
contributions, however, do not result in
the reattribution of gross income. Accordingly, when a disregarded transaction
with a foreign branch may be structured
as either a remittance or contribution, on
the one hand, or as a sale, exchange, or
license, on the other hand, the amount of
gross income attributed to a foreign branch
May 22, 2023
could be manipulated. This concern is
heightened when the property in question
is highly mobile and highly valuable, as is
generally true of intangible property (and
less frequently true of tangible property).
To address these concerns §1.9044(f)(2)(vi)(D) provides that the amount
of gross income attributable to a foreign
branch (and the amount of gross income
attributable to its foreign branch owner)
that is not passive category income must
be adjusted to reflect all transactions that
are disregarded for U.S. tax purposes
in which property described in section
367(d)(4) is transferred to or from a foreign branch or between foreign branches,
whether or not a disregarded payment is
made in connection with the transfer. In
determining the amount of gross income
that is attributable to a foreign branch that
must be adjusted, the principles of sections
367(d) and 482 apply. For example, if a
foreign branch owner transfers property
described in section 367(d)(4) to a foreign
branch, the principles of section 367(d)
are applied by treating the foreign branch
as a separate foreign corporation to which
the property is transferred in exchange for
stock of the corporation in a transaction
described in section 351. Similarly, if a
foreign branch remits property described
in section 367(d)(4) to its foreign branch
owner, the foreign branch is treated as
having sold the transferred property to
the foreign branch owner in exchange
for annual payments contingent on the
productivity or use of the property, the
amounts of which are determined under
the principles of sections 367(d) and 482.
Explanation of Provisions
I. Section 367(d) Repatriation Rules
A. In general
As described in part II of the Background of this Preamble, §1.367(d)-1T(f)
(3) provides that a subsequent disposition
of intangible property by the transferee
foreign corporation to a related person
does not affect a U.S. transferor’s annual
inclusion under §1.367(d)-1T(c) or (e).
This provision further provides that the
related person that receives the intangible
property is treated as the new transferee
foreign corporation for purposes of any
May 22, 2023
required adjustments and any accounts
receivable created under §1.367(d)-1T(g).
Accordingly, the section 367(d) regulations require the U.S. transferor to
recognize annual inclusions even if the
income earned from the intangible property is subject to current U.S. taxation
in the hands of the U.S. person holding
the intangible property. In addition, the
deemed (substituted) transferee foreign
corporation is not allowed a deduction that
could reduce taxable income, even though
that deemed transferee foreign corporation is the U.S. transferor or a related U.S.
person.
Continuing to apply section 367(d) in
such cases could give rise to excessive
U.S. taxation and disincentivize taxpayers
from repatriating that property. To address
these concerns, proposed §1.367(d)-1(f)
(4) generally terminates the application
of section 367(d) if the transferee foreign corporation repatriates the intangible
property to a “qualified domestic person”
and certain reporting requirements are satisfied. See proposed §1.367(d)-1(f)(4)(i).
See part I.C of this Explanation of Provisions for a discussion of the definition of
a qualified domestic person and part III of
this Explanation of Provisions for a discussion of the reporting requirements.
B. Consequences of repatriating
intangible property
1. In General
As noted in part I.A of this Explanation
of Provisions, the proposed regulations
terminate the continued application of
section 367(d) when a transferee foreign
corporation repatriates intangible property
to a qualified domestic person and the U.S.
transferor provides the relevant information described in proposed §1.6038B-1(d)
(2) and, when those requirements are met,
the proposed regulations require the U.S.
transferor to include in gross income a
partial annual inclusion attributable to the
part of its taxable year that the transferee
foreign corporation held the intangible
property, after which the intangible property is no longer subject to section 367(d)
(thus, for example, the annual inclusion stream terminates). See proposed
§1.367(d)-1(f)(4)(i). The proposed regulations also require the U.S. transferor
860
to recognize gain (which amount may
be zero in certain cases) as a result of the
repatriation. See Id. Additionally, the proposed regulations provide a special rule
(discussed in part I.D of this Explanation
of Provisions) to determine the qualified
domestic person’s basis in the repatriated
intangible property. The transferee foreign
corporation, on the other hand, makes the
required adjustments currently described
in §1.367(d)-1T(c)(2), with minor clarifications, for cases in which the section
367(d) repatriation rules apply (that is, the
adjustments with respect to the U.S. transferor’s partial annual inclusion for the year
of the repatriation). See part I.E of this
Explanation of Provisions for a discussion
of the modifications made with respect to
the required adjustments described in current §1.367(d)-1T(c)(2)(ii) and (e)(2)(ii).
The manner in which the repatriation
occurs will determine whether the U.S.
transferor must recognize gain in connection with the repatriation transaction, with
corresponding adjustments being made as
to the transferee foreign corporation. For
example, the U.S. transferor would not
recognize gain in the case of a repatriation
occurring by reason of a nonrecognition
transaction pursuant to which no gain
or loss is recognized as to the transferee
foreign corporation. See part I.B.2 of this
Explanation of Provisions for a discussion
of the rules that apply based on the form
of the transaction by which the intangible property is repatriated. The proposed
regulations, therefore, address the tax consequences under section 367(d) as to the
intangible property, but do not otherwise
alter the tax treatment of the transaction by which the intangible property is
repatriated.
2. Gain Recognition as to the U.S.
Transferor
Consistent with section 367(d)(2)(A)
(ii)(II), proposed §1.367(d)-1(f)(4)(i)(A)
(the “gain recognition rule”) requires the
U.S. transferor to recognize gain equal
to the amount described in proposed
§1.367(d)-1(f)(4)(ii). The gain recognition rule, in conjunction with the rules
described in parts I.B.3 (Required adjustments for certain gain recognized) and
I.D (Qualified domestic person’s adjusted
basis in repatriated intangible property) of
Bulletin No. 2023–21
this Explanation of Provisions, generally
ensures that a qualified domestic person
does not receive a tax-free increase to the
adjusted basis in the repatriated intangible
property.
Thus, as noted in part I.B.1 of this
Explanation of Provisions, whether the
U.S. transferor recognizes gain under the
gain recognition rule depends on the form
of the repatriation transaction. Specifically, the gain recognition rule focuses on
whether the intangible property is transferred basis property (as defined in section
7701(a)(43)) by reason of the repatriation, without regard to the application of
section 367(d) and the section 367(d) regulations. See proposed §1.367(d)-1(f)(4)
(ii). The proposed regulations incorporate
the definition of transferred basis property for this purpose, as opposed to other
approaches for distinguishing the form of
the repatriation transaction, to ensure the
appropriate application of these proposed
rules in all circumstances.3
If the intangible property is transferred
basis property as described in the preceding paragraph, the amount of gain the
U.S. transferor will recognize pursuant
to the gain recognition rule is the amount
of gain the transferee foreign corporation
would recognize, if any, upon the repatriation under general subchapter C rules if
its adjusted basis in the intangible property were equal to the U.S. transferor’s
former adjusted basis in the property. See
proposed §1.367(d)-1(f)(4)(ii)(A). This
amount may be zero in the case of certain
repatriations, for example, a repatriation
by a transferee foreign corporation of
intangible property to the U.S. transferor
in a complete liquidation described in
sections 332 and 337, in which case the
U.S. transferor will not recognize any gain
under the gain recognition rule. Alternatively, if, for example, the repatriation
occurs in an exchange described in section 351(b) in which the transferee in the
exchange is a qualified domestic person
(as defined in proposed §1.367(d)-1(f)
(4)(iii)), the amount of gain determined
under this rule may be greater than zero,
even though the intangible property is
transferred basis property, because the
amount of gain is determined by reference
to the gain the transferee foreign corporation would recognize upon the transaction
if the adjusted basis in the intangible
property were equal to the U.S. transferor’s former adjusted basis in the intangible
property.
If the intangible property is not transferred basis property by reason of the
repatriation, the amount of gain a U.S.
transferor will recognize pursuant to the
gain recognition rule is the excess, if any,
of the fair market value of the intangible
property on the date of the repatriation
over the U.S. transferor’s former adjusted
basis in the property. See proposed
§1.367(d)-1(f)(2)(ii)(B). For example, if
the transferee foreign corporation repatriates the intangible property to the U.S.
transferor in a distribution described in
section 311, the intangible property is
not transferred basis property, and therefore the rule described in this paragraph
applies to determine the amount of gain
recognized by the U.S. transferor under
the gain recognition rule.
3. Required Adjustments Related to
Certain Gain Recognized
Current §1.367(d)-1T(f)(2)(i) provides
that a transferee foreign corporation’s
E&P are reduced, in relevant part, by
the amount of gain recognized by a U.S.
transferor under §1.367(d)-1T(f)(1).
Because a U.S. transferor recognizes gain
in these cases in the form of a lump-sum
inclusion, the corresponding adjustment
to the transferee foreign corporation’s
E&P is generally intended to reduce the
E&P that arises for the transferee foreign
corporation by reason of the disposition
(and, in so doing, the adjustment prevents
potential excessive E&P arising from
that disposition). To achieve this goal,
§1.367(d)-1T(f)(2) necessarily implies a
preceding increase to the transferee foreign corporation’s E&P by reason of the
disposition that is then offset by the corresponding reduction. For example, consider
a case in which a U.S. transferor contributed intangible property with an adjusted
basis of $0 to a wholly owned transferee foreign corporation in an exchange
described in section 351(a) that was sub-
ject to section 367(d). In a later year, the
transferee foreign corporation disposes
of the intangible property to an unrelated
person when the fair market value of
the intangible property is $100x, which
causes the U.S. transferor to recognize
$100x of gain under §1.367(d)-1T(f)(1);
also, assume the transferee foreign corporation has $50x of other E&P unrelated
to the subsequent disposition of the intangible property. Section 1.367(d)-1T(f)
(2) does not simply reduce the transferee
foreign corporation’s E&P by $100x, but
rather the corresponding reduction would
offset the $100x of E&P that arises as to
the transferee foreign corporation by reason of the disposition, thereby preventing
potential excessive E&P and leaving the
transferee foreign corporation’s other
E&P unaffected.
Similarly, and in order to prevent
excessive E&P and gross income as to the
transferee foreign corporation because of
the gain recognition rule or §1.367(d)-1T(f)
(1), proposed §1.367(d)-1(f)(2)(i) provides certain adjustments to the transferee
foreign corporation’s E&P and gross
income that arise by reason of any gain
the U.S. transferor recognizes under the
gain recognition rule or §1.367(d)-1T(f)
(1). Specifically, for purposes of chapter
1 of the Code – that is, chapter 1 (relating
to normal taxes and surtaxes) of subtitle
A (relating to income taxes) of the Code
— the transferee foreign corporation
reduces (but not below zero) the portion
of its E&P and gross income arising from
the transaction to take into account the
gain recognized by the U.S. transferor.
See proposed §1.367(d)-1(f)(2)(i). And,
as provided currently under the section
367(d) regulations, any gain so recognized
can be received by the U.S. transferor
without further U.S. tax consequences
pursuant to the account receivable mechanism provided in §1.367(d)-1T(g)(1). See
proposed §1.367(d)-1(f)(2)(ii).
Because
section
367(d)
effectively shifts certain gain a transferee
foreign corporation would recognize as
to intangible property directly to a U.S.
transferor under the gain recognition
rule or §1.367(d)-1T(f)(1) (as applicable), these rules are intended to provide
For example, if the form of the repatriation transaction were distinguished by reference to whether the repatriation occurred pursuant to a nonrecognition transaction (as described in section
7701(a)(45)), uncertainty could arise in certain cases, such as repatriations that occur pursuant to exchanges involving boot (such as cash). This uncertainty would impact the proposed rules
for determining a qualified domestic person’s adjusted basis in the repatriated intangible property, which relies on the form of the repatriation as described in this paragraph.
3
Bulletin No. 2023–21
861
May 22, 2023
appropriate reductions to offset, as to the
transferee foreign corporation, the impact
of a U.S. transferor’s recognition of gain
under section 367(d). In most cases, the
proper reduction described in proposed
§1.367(d)-1(f)(2)(i) will equal the amount
of gain recognized by the U.S. transferor
under the provisions described in the preceding sentence. But the proper reduction
may diverge from the amount of gain recognized by the U.S. transferor in certain
cases, depending on the position taken
with respect to the transferee foreign corporation’s basis in the intangible property
during the time the intangible property is
subject to section 367(d). See part I.D of
this Explanation of Provisions for additional discussion of this issue.
4. Special Rule for Related Transactions
Proposed §1.367(d)-1(f)(4)(v) provides
a special rule that applies if the intangible property is transferred in two or more
related transactions. If this special rule
applies, whether and how the proposed
regulations apply depends on the ultimate
recipient of the intangible property. See
proposed §1.367(d)-1(f)(6)(ii)(D) and (E)
(Examples 4 and 5) for illustrations of this
rule.
C. Qualified domestic person
Proposed §1.367(d)-1(f)(4)(iii) defines
a qualified domestic person for purposes of the proposed regulations. First,
a qualified domestic person includes
the U.S. transferor that initially transferred the intangible property subject to
section 367(d) that is repatriated (an “initial U.S. transferor”) and a U.S. person
treated as the U.S. transferor pursuant to
§1.367(d)1T(e)(1) as applied with certain
limitations (a “qualified successor”). See
proposed §1.367(d)-1(f)(4)(iii)(A) and
(B). Specifically, these limitations require
that a qualified successor must be either
an individual or a corporation other than
a corporation exempt from tax under
section 501(a), a regulated investment
company (as defined in section 851(a)), a
real estate investment trust (as defined in
section 856(a)), a domestic international
sales corporation (DISC) (as defined in
section 992(a)(1)), or an S corporation (as
defined in section 1361(a)) (a domestic
May 22, 2023
corporation meeting these requirements, a
“qualified corporation”). Second, a qualified domestic person also includes a U.S.
person that is an individual or a qualified
corporation related to the U.S. transferor
within the meaning of §1.367(d)-1T(h).
See proposed §1.367(d)-1(f)(4)(iii)(C)
and (D).
The proposed regulations define a
qualified domestic person in this manner
based on the principle that it is generally
appropriate to terminate the continued
application of section 367(d) only when
all the income produced by the intangible
property, as well as gain recognized on
a disposition of the intangible property,
will be subject to current tax in the United
States as to the qualified domestic person
while that person holds the property. It
is also appropriate to terminate the continued application of section 367(d) for
a repatriation to an initial U.S. transferor
because such a transfer merely restores
the circumstances that existed at the time
of the original outbound transfer subject
to section 367(d).
A qualified domestic person, as noted
above, also includes certain U.S. persons
(individuals and qualified corporations)
related to either the initial U.S. transferor
or qualified successor, as applicable. See
proposed §1.367(d)-1(f)(4)(iii)(C) and
(D). This aspect of the definition of qualified domestic person implements the same
principle described in the preceding paragraph; that is, to terminate the continued
application of section 367(d), all of the
income or gain from the intangible property must be subject to current tax in the
United States as to the qualified domestic
person after the repatriation or the repatriation must restore the circumstances
that existed at the time of the original outbound transfer subject to section 367(d).
In the case of a domestic partnership,
§1.367(d)-1T(h) defines a related person
for purposes of the section 367(d) regulations by reference to certain relationships
described in section 267 or 707(b)(1).
Thus, if a U.S. transferor owns more than
50 percent of the capital or profits interest in a domestic partnership, the U.S.
transferor and the domestic partnership
are related within the meaning of section
707(b)(1) and, therefore, the U.S. transferor and the domestic partnership are
related for purposes of §1.367(d)-1T(h),
862
even if the domestic partnership has
one or more foreign partners. The proposed regulations, however, do not treat
the domestic partnership as a qualified
domestic person. The Treasury Department and the IRS considered addressing
such cases by including rules in the proposed regulations treating a partnership
as an aggregate of its partners (an “aggregate approach”), with the analysis for
qualified domestic person status occurring under such an aggregate approach.
See, for example, §§1.367(a)-1T(c)(3)
(i) and 1.367(d)-1T(a) for similar rules
that apply to certain transfers of intangible property by a partnership to a foreign
corporation. The proposed regulations do
not adopt an aggregate approach because
that approach could allow taxpayers to
circumvent the purposes of these proposed regulations and other related
regulations following a repatriation to a
domestic partnership. This could occur
if, for example, partnership allocations
are changed after the repatriation or if
the transferee foreign corporation (or a
related foreign corporation) has liquidation rights to the intangible property
following the transfer. Additionally, in
the case of a partnership with one or
more partners that are qualified domestic persons and one or more partners that
are not, an aggregate approach would
necessitate rules to measure the extent
to which proposed §1.367(d)-1(f)(4)(i)
applies by reason of a repatriation (and,
by extension, the extent to which the
annual inclusion stream under section
367(d) should continue to apply after
the repatriation). To address this concern, the Treasury Department and the
IRS also considered including, as part of
an aggregate approach in the proposed
regulations, rules like those provided in
§§1.367(a)-3 and 1.367(a)-8 regarding
gain recognition agreements to ensure
that, to the extent the relief provided in
proposed §1.367(d)-1(f)(4)(i) applies as
to a repatriation, a corresponding amount
of income from the intangible property
would be, and would continue to be,
subject to tax in the United States. After
consideration, however, the Treasury
Department and the IRS are not proposing such an approach, because it would
be unworkable due to the compliance and
administrative burden.
Bulletin No. 2023–21
D. Qualified domestic person’s adjusted
basis in repatriated intangible property
Proposed §1.367(d)-1(f)(4)(iv) provides rules regarding a qualified domestic
person’s basis in the intangible property
it receives in a repatriation. Specifically,
the proposed regulations provide that,
in the case of repatriation pursuant to
which the intangible property qualifies
as transferred basis property, a qualified
domestic person’s adjusted basis in the
intangible property will equal, subject
to any applicable limitations that may
apply under the Code, the lesser of the
U.S. transferor’s former adjusted basis in
the intangible property or the transferee
foreign corporation’s adjusted basis in
that property (immediately before the
repatriation), increased by the greater
of the amount of gain recognized by the
U.S. transferor under the proposed regulations upon the repatriation (if any)
or the amount of gain recognized by the
transferee foreign corporation upon the
repatriation (if any). See §1.367(d)-1(f)
(4)(v)(A). The result in most cases will
track the result that would occur under
generally applicable rules, like section 334(b) or 362, while appropriately
accounting for situations in which the
gain a U.S. transferor recognizes under
the gain recognition rule differs from the
gain the transferee foreign corporation
recognizes by reason of the repatriation.
Alternatively, if the intangible property
does not qualify as transferred basis
property, a qualified domestic person’s
adjusted basis in the intangible property will equal the fair market value of
the intangible property as of the date of
the subsequent disposition. See proposed
§1.367(d)-1(f)(4)(iv)(B).
The Treasury Department and the IRS
are aware of the uncertainty regarding the
treatment of adjusted basis in intangible
property subject to section 367(d) while
section 367(d) applies, particularly when
the U.S. transferor’s former adjusted
basis is greater than zero. The proposed
regulations are intended to address basis
consequences solely when intangible
property is repatriated in a transaction that
eliminates the continued application of
section 367(d). In this manner, the effect of
proposed §1.367(d)-1(f)(4)(iv) is prospective insofar as it provides for a qualified
Bulletin No. 2023–21
domestic person’s adjusted basis in the
intangible property after the property is
no longer subject to section 367(d). Thus,
the proposed regulations do not address,
nor is any implication intended as to, the
appropriate treatment of adjusted basis
as to the transferee foreign corporation
in intangible property subject to section 367(d) while section 367(d) applies;
instead, the Treasury Department and the
IRS will address general basis rules under
section 367(d) in future rulemaking. Until
such general rules are issued, proposed
§1.367(d)-1(f)(4)(iv) would operate in
a manner intended to reach an appropriate result regarding a qualified domestic
person’s basis in repatriated intangible
property. See proposed §1.367(d)-1(f)(6)
(ii)(C) (Example 3) for an illustration of
this rule.
E. Required adjustments related to an
annual section 367(d) inclusion
As noted in part I.A of this Explanation
of Provisions, the transferee foreign corporation makes the required adjustments
currently described in §1.367(d)-1T(c)
(2) for cases in which the section 367(d)
repatriation rules apply (that is, the adjustments with respect to the U.S. transferor’s
partial annual inclusion for the year of
the repatriation). Current §1.367(d)-1T(c)
(2)(ii) provides that, as to a U.S. transferor’s annual inclusion, the transferee
foreign corporation may treat that deemed
payment as an expense (whether or not
paid) properly allocated and apportioned
against gross income subject to subpart
F, in accordance with §§1.954-1(c) and
1.861-8.
The proposed regulations provide that
the deemed payment by the transferee
foreign corporation is treated as an allowable deduction that must be allocated
and apportioned to such corporation’s
classes of gross income in accordance
with §§1.882-4(b)(1), 1.954-1(c), and
1.960-1(c) and (d) (as appropriate). See
proposed §1.367(d)-1(c)(2)(ii). Proposed
§1.367(d)-1(c)(2)(ii) thus clarifies that
the allowable deduction is allocated and
apportioned under the provisions cited
in the previous sentence potentially to
any class (or classes) of gross income (as
appropriate) rather than solely to gross
income subject to subpart F in all cir-
863
cumstances. The proposed regulations
make identical clarifications in proposed
§1.367(d)-1(e)(2)(ii) (required adjustments in the case of a subsequent transfer
of stock of the transferee foreign corporation to a successor U.S. transferor). The
proposed regulations change the reference
to “expense” in the current regulations
to “allowable deduction” for clarity; this
modification is not intended to be a substantive change.
F. Multiple U.S. transferors
As noted in part I.C of the Background
section of this Preamble, there may be
multiple U.S. transferors with respect to
the same intangible property, which may
occur, for example, if a U.S. transferor
subsequently transfers a portion of its
stock in the transferee foreign corporation
to a successor U.S. transferor. In these
cases, because the section 367(d) regulations apply separately as to each U.S.
transferor, the requirements of proposed
§1.367(d)-1(f)(4)(i) also apply separately
with respect to each U.S. transferor. That
is, to terminate the continued application
of section 367(d) with respect to a particular U.S. transferor, the recipient of the
transferred intangible property must be a
qualified domestic person with respect to
that U.S. transferor and the information
described in proposed §1.6038B-1(d)(2)
(iv) must be provided.
To illustrate, assume that a transferee
foreign corporation (“TFC”) holds intangible property that is subject to section
367(d), and TFC repatriates that intangible
property on date X. Also assume that two
domestic corporations (“US1” and “US2”)
are treated as U.S. transferors under the
section 367(d) regulations by reason of
owning stock of TFC (US1 was the original U.S. transferor and US2 is a successor
U.S. transferor by reason of its acquisition of a portion of the stock of TFC from
US1). Therefore, if the recipient of the
transferred intangible property on date X
is a qualified domestic person (for example, a related domestic corporation) with
respect to US1, but is an unrelated person
with respect to US2, the following occurs:
proposed §1.367(d)-1(f)(4)(i) would
apply with respect to US1, if the information described in proposed §1.6038B-1(d)
(2)(iv) is provided, and US2 would rec-
May 22, 2023
ognize gain under §1.367(d)-1T(f)(1) by
reason of the transaction.
G. Other modifications
The proposed regulations update the
references to section 936(h)(3)(B) that
appear in the applicable regulations
under section 367 with references to
section 367(d)(4), which was added as
part of the Consolidated Appropriations
Act in 2018. See Public Law 115-141
and §§1.367(a)-1(d)(5) and (6) and
1.367(e)-2(b)(2)(i)(B). The proposed regulations do not update all references to
section 936(h)(3)(B) that appear in regulations issued under other sections of the
Code, but such an update will be included
as part of future rulemaking.
The proposed regulations provide that
proposed §1.367(d)-1(f)(3) would not
apply as to a repatriation meeting the
requirements of proposed §1.367(d)-1(f)
(4)(i)(B); instead, proposed §1.367(d)-1(f)
(4)(i) applies, and, thereafter, the intangible property is no longer subject to
section 367(d). The language in proposed
§1.367(d)-1(f)(3) also reflects minor
editorial differences from the language
currently in §1.367(d)-1T(f)(3) that are
not intended to be substantive. See proposed §1.367(d)-1(f)(3).
The proposed regulations fix a longstanding typographical error by replacing
the reference to “section 267(d)” in current
§1.367(d)-1T(h)(2)(ii) with a reference to
“267(f).”
Finally, the proposed regulations eliminate §1.951A-2(c)(2)(ii), which provides
that deductions taken into account in
determining a CFC’s tested income and
tested loss under section 951A include the
amount of a deemed payment under section
367(d)(2)(A). This rule is no longer necessary because the proposed regulations
provide that such deemed payments are
treated as allowable deductions in accordance with, in relevant part, §1.951A-2(c)
(3). See proposed §1.367(d)-1(c)(2)(ii)
and (e)(2)(i).
II. Section 904(d) Foreign Branch
Income Rules
As noted in part III of the Background
section of this Preamble, the provisions
in §1.904-4(f)(2)(vi)(D) provide that,
May 22, 2023
in relevant part, the principles of section 367(d) apply for determining the
amount of gross income that is attributable to a foreign branch that must be
adjusted under §1.904-4(f)(2)(vi)(D).
But those provisions do not elaborate
on how the principles of section 367(d)
apply for that purpose; in particular, there
is no mention of how or whether current
§1.367(d)-1T(f) applies in the foreign
branch income context.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
believe that due to the differing scopes
and purposes of section 367(d) and
§1.904-4(f)(2)(vi)(D), the consequences
of a subsequent transfer for purposes
of determining a U.S. transferor’s section 367(d) inclusion do not necessarily
inform the appropriate treatment for
purposes of the section 904(d) branch
income rules. Section 367(d), as a threshold matter, applies only in the case of
certain outbound transfers of intangible
property by a U.S. person to a foreign corporation, whereas §1.904-4(f)(2)(vi)(D)
applies to outbound transfers by a U.S.
foreign branch owner to a foreign branch,
inbound transfers by a foreign branch to
a U.S. foreign branch owner, as well as
transfers between foreign branches with
the same U.S. foreign branch owner. If
there are multiple transfers of an item
of intangible property over time, each
transfer must be separately evaluated
and could result in differing amounts of
deemed annual payments depending on
any interim changes in the value of the
intangible property between successive
transfers. Accordingly, these proposed
regulations provide that each successive transfer to which §1.904-4(f)(2)(vi)
(D) applies is considered independently
from any other preceding or subsequent
transfers. See proposed §1.904-(f)(2)
(vi)(D)(4). Therefore, the subsequent
transfer rules in the regulations under
section 367(d), including the rule for
repatriations provided in these proposed
regulations, do not apply in the context
of determining gross income attributable
to the foreign branch income category
and each successive transfer is separately
subject to the provisions of §1.904-(f)(2)
(vi)(D)(1) and will not terminate or otherwise impact the application of §1.904-(f)
(2)(vi)(D)(1) to a prior transfer described
in that paragraph.
864
III. Reporting
A. Reporting requirements for subsequent
transfers of intangible property
As described in part I.A of this
Explanation of Provisions, proposed
§1.367(d)-1(f)(4)(i) requires a U.S. transferor to provide the information described
in proposed §1.6038B-1(d)(2)(iv) with
respect to the repatriation. In general,
§§1.6038B-1 and 1.6038B-1T provide
information reporting rules that apply
with respect to transfers of property to
foreign corporations, including transfers
of property described in sections 367(a)
and (d). See §1.6038B-1(c) and (d). Section 1.6038B-1T(d) provides specific
information reporting rules for transfers
subject to section 367(d), including rules
that apply to subsequent transfers. See
§1.6038B-1T(d)(2).
These proposed regulations make
two conforming changes to the reporting
requirements for subsequent transfers
under §1.6038B-1T(d)(2) (the “proposed
information reporting rules”). The first
change provides that, to the extent a qualified domestic person receives intangible
property in a subsequent transfer, the subsequent transfer information described in
proposed §1.6038B-1(d)(2)(iv) instead
of the subsequent transfer information
described in §1.6038B-1T(d)(2)(iii) must
be provided.
The second change adds information
reporting requirements for a subsequent
transfer of intangible property to a qualified
domestic person. See proposed §1.6038B1(d)(2)(iv). These reporting rules request
information that is necessary to ensure
that proposed §1.367(d)-1(f)(4) is appropriately applied to the subsequent transfer.
B. Relief for certain failures to provide
required information
In general, as a condition for terminating the application of section 367(d)
with respect to the transferred intangible
property, proposed §1.367(d)-1(f)(4)(i)
(B) requires a U.S. transferor to provide
the information described in proposed
§1.6038B-1(d)(2)(iv). If a U.S. transferor fails to provide that information,
the repatriation is subject to proposed
§1.367(d)-1(f)(3) such that the sec-
Bulletin No. 2023–21
tion 367(d) regulations, including the
requirement to take an annual inclusion
into account over the useful life of the
intangible property, continue to apply.
However, a U.S. transferor is eligible for
relief under the proposed regulations if
proposed §1.367(d)-1(f)(4)(i)(B) would
have applied to the subsequent transfer of intangible property but for the
fact that the required information was
not provided and the U.S. transferor,
upon becoming aware of the failure,
promptly provides the required information and explains its failure to comply.
See proposed §1.367(d)-1(f)(5). When
it applies, proposed §1.367(d)-1(f)(5)
treats the requirements of proposed
§1.367(d)-1(f)(4)(i)(B) as satisfied as
of the date of the transfer of intangible property to the qualified domestic
person.
IV. Applicability Dates
The proposed regulations generally apply to subsequent dispositions of
intangible property occurring on or after
the date of publication of the Treasury
decision adopting these rules as final
regulations in the Federal Register. See
proposed §§1.367(d)-1(j)(2)), 1.904-4(q)
(3), and 1.6038B-1(g). Proposed §1.951A2(c)(2) applies to taxable years of foreign
corporations ending on or after the date
of publication of the Treasury decision
adopting these rules as final regulations in
the Federal Register, and to taxable years
of United States shareholders in which or
with which such taxable years end. See
proposed §1.951A-7(e).
Special Analyses
I. Regulatory Planning and Review —
Economic Analysis
The Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
(“OIRA”), Office of Management and
Budget (“OMB”), has determined that
this proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action, as that term is defined in
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
Therefore, OIRA has not reviewed this
proposed rule pursuant to section 6(a)(3)
(A) of Executive Order 12866 and the
April 11, 2018, Memorandum of Agree-
Bulletin No. 2023–21
ment between the Treasury Department
and OMB.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information contained
in this notice of proposed rulemaking has
been submitted to OMB for review in
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act under control number 1545-0026.
Commenters are strongly encouraged to
submit public comments electronically.
Written comments and recommendations
for the proposed information collection
should be sent to https://www.reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRAMain, with copies to the
Internal Revenue Service. Find this particular information collection by selecting
“Currently under Review - Open for Public Comments” then by using the search
function. Submit electronic submissions
for the proposed information collection
to the IRS via email at omb.unit@irs.
gov (indicate “REG-124064-19 (15450026)” on the Subject line). Comments
on the collection of information should be
received by July 3, 2023. Comments are
specifically requested concerning:
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the IRS,
including whether the information will
have practical utility;
The accuracy of the estimated burden
associated with the proposed collection of
information;
How the quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected may be
enhanced;
How the burden of complying with
the proposed collection of information
may be minimized, including through
the application of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology; and
Estimates of capital or start-up costs
and costs of operation, maintenance,
and purchase of services to provide
information.
The collection of information in this
proposed regulation is in §1.6038B-1(d)
(2)(iv). This information is necessary to
ensure that proposed §1.367(d)-1(f)(4) is
appropriately applied to the subsequent
transfer.
The collection of information is
required to comply with section 367(d).
865
The likely respondents are domestic
corporations. Burdens associated with
these requirements will be reflected in
the burden for Form 926, Return by a
U.S. Transferor of Property to a Foreign
Corporation.
Estimated change in annual reporting
burden: 1601 hours.
Estimated increase in annual burden
per respondent: 2.4 hours.
Estimated number of respondents: 667.
Estimated frequency of responses:
annually.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond to,
a collection of information unless it displays a valid control number assigned by
the Office of Management and Budget.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
When an agency issues a rulemaking
proposal, the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. chapter 6) (“RFA”) requires the
agency “to prepare and make available
for public comment an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis” that will “describe
the impact of the proposed rule on small
entities.” See 5 U.S.C. 603(a). Section 605
of the RFA provides an exception to this
requirement if the agency certifies that the
proposed rulemaking will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. A small entity
is defined as a small business, small nonprofit organization, or small governmental
jurisdiction. See 5 U.S.C. 601(3) through
(6).
The Treasury Department and the IRS
do not have detailed data readily available to assess the exact number of small
entities potentially affected by the proposed regulations. Based on the limited
data available, it is estimated that there
will be less than 700 taxpayers potentially
affected by the proposed regulations. But,
among those taxpayers, an even smaller
portion will likely be affected by the proposed regulations as these rules apply to a
specific type of transaction – repatriations
of intangible property subject to section
367(d). Moreover, the entities potentially
affected by these proposed regulations
are generally not small entities, because
of the resources and investment necessary to develop intangible property and,
once so developed, transfer the intangible
May 22, 2023
property to a foreign corporation. Therefore, the Treasury Department and the IRS
certify that the proposed regulations will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities.
The IRS invites the public to comment on
the impact of these regulations on small
entities.
IV. Section 7805(f)
Pursuant to section 7805(f), this notice
of proposed rulemaking has been submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy
of the Small Business Administration for
comment on its impact on small business.
V. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 requires that agencies
assess anticipated costs and benefits and
take certain other actions before issuing a
final rule that includes any Federal mandate that may result in expenditures in any
one year by a State, local, or Tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private
sector, of $100 million in 1995 dollars,
updated annually for inflation. This rule
does not include any Federal mandate that
may result in expenditures by State, local,
or Tribal governments, or by the private
sector in excess of that threshold.
VI. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled
“Federalism”) prohibits an agency from
publishing any rule that has federalism
implications if the rule either imposes
substantial, direct compliance costs on
State and local governments, and is not
required by statute, or preempts State law,
unless the agency meets the consultation
and funding requirements of section 6 of
the Executive order. This proposed rule
does not have federalism implications,
does not impose substantial direct compliance costs on State and local governments,
and does not preempt State law within the
meaning of the Executive order.
Comments and Requests for Public
Hearing
Before these proposed amendments
to the regulations are adopted as final
May 22, 2023
regulations, consideration will be given
to comments that are submitted timely
to the IRS as prescribed in the Preamble
under the ADDRESSES section. The
Treasury Department and the IRS request
comments on all aspects of the proposed
regulations.
A public hearing will be scheduled if
requested in writing by any person who
timely submits electronic or written comments. Requests for a public hearing are
encouraged to be made electronically. If a
public hearing is scheduled, notice of the
date and time for the public hearing will
be published in the Federal Register.
Announcement 2020-4, 2020-17 IRB 1,
provides that until further notice, public
hearings conducted by the IRS will be
held telephonically. Any telephonic hearing will be made accessible to people with
disabilities.
Statement of Availability of IRS
Documents
IRS Revenue Procedures, Revenue
Rulings, and Notices cited in this Preamble are published in the Internal Revenue
Bulletin (or Cumulative Bulletin) and
are available from the Superintendent of
Documents, U.S. Government Publishing
Office, Washington, DC 20402, or by visiting the IRS website at https://www.irs.
gov.
Drafting Information
The principal authors of these regulations are Chadwick Rowland and L.
Ulysses Chatman, Office of Associate
Chief Counsel (International). However,
other personnel from the Treasury Department and the IRS participated in their
development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, the Treasury Department
and the IRS propose to amend 26 CFR
part 1 as follows:
866
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for
part 1 continues to read in part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 1.367(d)-1 also issued under
26 U.S.C. 367(d).
*****
§1.367(a)-1 [Amended]
Par. 2. Section 1.367(a)-1 is amended
by removing the language “section 936(h)
(3)(B)” in paragraphs (d)(5) and (6) and
adding the language “section 367(d)(4)”
in its place.
Par. 3. Section 1.367(d)-1 is amended
by:
1. Removing reserved paragraphs (c)(1)
through (2).
2. Adding a heading to paragraph (c)
and adding paragraphs (c)(1) and (2).
3. Removing reserved paragraphs (c)(4)
through (g)(2) (introductory text).
4. Adding paragraphs (c)(4), (d), (e),
and (f).
5. Adding a heading to paragraph (g)
and adding paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)
(2) introductory text.
6. Removing reserved paragraphs (g)(2)
(ii) through (g)(2)(iii)(D).
7. Adding paragraph (g)(2)(ii) and
reserved
paragraphs
(g)(2)(iii)
introductory text and (g)(2)(iii)(A)
through (D).
8. Removing reserved paragraphs (g)(4)
through (i).
9. Adding paragraphs (g)(4), (h), and
(i).
10. Revising paragraph (j).
The additions and revision read as
follows:
§1.367(d)-1 Transfers of intangible
property to foreign corporations.
*****
(c) Deemed payments upon transfer of
intangible property to foreign corporation—(1) In general. For further guidance,
see §1.367(d)-1T(c)(1).
(2) Required adjustments. For further
guidance, see §1.367(d)-1T(c)(2) introductory text and (c)(2)(i).
(i) [Reserved]
(ii) The deemed payment is treated as
an allowable deduction (whether or not
Bulletin No. 2023–21
that amount is paid) of the transferee foreign corporation properly allocated and
apportioned to the appropriate classes of
gross income in accordance with §§1.8824(b)(1), 1.951A-2(c)(3), 1.954-1(c),
1.960-1(c), and 1.960-1(d), as applicable.
*****
(4) Blocked income. For further guidance, see §1.367(d)-1T(c)(4).
(d) Subsequent transfer of stock
of transferee corporation to unrelated person. For further guidance, see
§1.367(d)-1T(d).
(e) Subsequent transfer of stock of
transferee foreign corporation to related
person—(1) Transfer to related U.S. person treated as disposition of intangible
property. For further guidance, see §1.
367(d)-1T(e)(1).
(2) Required adjustments. For further
guidance, see §1.367(d)-1T(e)(2) introductory text and (e)(2)(i).
(i) [Reserved]
(ii) The deemed payment is treated as
an allowable deduction (whether or not
that amount is paid) of the transferee foreign corporation properly allocated and
apportioned to the appropriate classes of
gross income in accordance with §§1.8824(b)(1), 1.951A-2(c)(3), 1.954-1(c),
1.960-1(c), and 1.960-1(d), as applicable.
(iii) For further guidance, see
§1.367(d)-1T(e)(2)(iii) through (e)(4).
(iv) [Reserved]
(3) through (4) [Reserved]
(f) Subsequent disposition of transferred intangible property by transferee
foreign corporation—(1) In general. For
further guidance, see §1.367(d)-1T(f)(1).
(2) Required adjustments. If a U.S.
transferor is required to recognize gain
under paragraph (f)(4)(i)(A) of this
section or §1.367(d)-1T(f)(1), then, in
addition to the adjustments described
in paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section
and §1.367(d)-1T(c)(2) with respect
to the deemed payment described in
§1.367(d)-1T(f)(1)(ii)—
(i) For purposes of chapter 1 of the
Code, the transferee foreign corporation
reduces (but not below zero) the portion of
its earnings and profits and gross income
arising by reason of the subsequent disposition of the intangible property by the
amount of gain recognized by the U.S.
transferor under paragraph (f)(4)(i)(A) of
this section or §1.367(d)-1T(f)(1); and
Bulletin No. 2023–21
(ii) The U.S. transferor may establish
an account receivable from the transferee
foreign corporation equal to the amount of
gain recognized under paragraph (f)(4)(i)
(A) of this section or §1.367(d)-1T(f)(1)
in accordance with §1.367(d)-1T(g)(1).
(3) Subsequent transfer of intangible property to related person. Except as
provided in paragraph (f)(4)(i)(B) of this
section, a U.S. person’s requirement to
recognize income under §1.367(d)-1T(c)
or (e) is not affected by the transferee
foreign corporation’s subsequent disposition of the transferred intangible property
to a related person. For purposes of any
required adjustments, and of any accounts
receivable created under §1.367(d)-1T(g)
(1), the related person that receives the
intangible property is treated as the transferee foreign corporation.
(4) Subsequent transfer of intangible
property to qualified domestic person—
(i) In general. Except as provided in
paragraph (f)(4)(v) of this section, if a
U.S. person transfers intangible property
subject to section 367(d) and the rules of
this section and §1.367(d)-1T to a foreign
corporation in an exchange described in
section 351 or 361 and, within the useful
life of the intangible property, that transferee foreign corporation subsequently
disposes of the intangible property to a
qualified domestic person, then—
(A) The U.S. transferor of the intangible property (or any person treated as
such pursuant to §1.367(d)-1T(e)(1)) is
required to recognize gain, as applicable,
equal to the amount described in paragraph (f)(4)(ii) of this section; and
(B) If the U.S. transferor provides the
information described in §1.6038B-1(d)
(2)(iv), then—
(1) The U.S. transferor is required to
recognize a deemed payment as provided
in §1.367(d)-1T(f)(1)(ii); and
(2) The intangible property is no longer
subject to section 367(d), this section, and
§1.367(d)-1T after applying paragraphs
(f)(4)(i)(A) and (f)(4)(i)(B)(1) of this
section.
(ii) Gain recognition for U.S. transferor. The amount of gain a U.S. transferor
must recognize under paragraph (f)(4)
(i)(A) of this section is determined as
follows—
(A) If the intangible property is transferred basis property (as defined in section
867
7701(a)(43)) by reason of the subsequent disposition (determined without
regard to section 367(d), this section,
and §1.367(d)-1T), the amount of gain,
if any, the transferee foreign corporation
would recognize if its adjusted basis in the
intangible property were equal to the U.S.
transferor’s former adjusted basis in the
property; or
(B) If the intangible property is not
transferred basis property by reason of the
subsequent disposition (determined without regard to section 367(d), this section,
and §1.367(d)-1T), the excess, if any, of
the fair market value of the intangible
property on the date of the subsequent disposition and the U.S. transferor’s former
adjusted basis in that property.
(iii) Qualified domestic person. For purposes of paragraph (f)(4) of this section, a
qualified domestic person means—
(A) The U.S. transferor that initially
transferred intangible property subject to
section 367(d);
(B) A U.S. person treated as a U.S.
transferor under §1.367(d)-1T(e)(1),
provided such person is an individual or
a corporation other than a corporation
exempt from tax under section 501(a), a
regulated investment company (as defined
in section 851(a)), a real estate investment trust (as defined in section 856(a)),
a domestic international sales corporation
(DISC) (as defined in section 992(a)(1)),
or an S corporation (as defined in section
1361(a));
(C) A U.S. person that is an individual related, within the meaning of
paragraph (h)(2)(ii) of this section and
§1.367(d)-1T(h), to the person described
in paragraph (f)(4)(iii)(A) or (B) of this
section; or
(D) A U.S. person that is a corporation related, within the meaning of
paragraph (h)(2)(ii) of this section and
§1.367(d)-1T(h), to the person described
in paragraph (f)(4)(iii)(A) or (B) of this
section, other than a corporation exempt
from tax under section 501(a), a regulated investment company (as defined in
section 851(a)), a real estate investment
trust (as defined in section 856(a)), a
DISC (as defined in section 992(a)(1)),
or an S corporation (as defined in section
1361(a)).
(iv) Qualified domestic person’s basis
in the intangible property. The qualified
May 22, 2023
domestic person’s adjusted basis in the
intangible property is—
(A) In the case of a subsequent disposition of intangible property described in
paragraph (f)(4)(ii)(A) of this section, and
subject to any applicable limitations that
may apply under the Code, the lesser of
the U.S. transferor’s former adjusted basis
in the intangible property or the transferee
foreign corporation’s adjusted basis in the
intangible property (as determined immediately before the subsequent disposition),
in each case increased by the greater of
the amount of gain (if any) described in
paragraph (f)(4)(ii)(A) of this section and
recognized by the U.S. transferor or the
amount of gain (if any) recognized by the
transferee foreign corporation as to the
intangible property by reason of the subsequent disposition; or
(B) In the case of a subsequent disposition of intangible property described in
paragraph (f)(4)(ii)(B) of this section, the
fair market value of the intangible property (as determined on the date of the
subsequent disposition).
(v) Special rule for related transactions. If the transferee foreign corporation
subsequently disposes of the transferred
intangible property to a person that
would, absent this paragraph (f)(4)(v), be
a qualified domestic person (initial transferee) and, as part of a series of related
transactions, the intangible property is
subsequently disposed of to any other
person, including by reason of multiple
dispositions, then the initial transferee is
treated as a qualified domestic person only
if the ultimate recipient of the intangible
property is a qualified domestic person.
See paragraphs (f)(6)(ii)(D) and (E) of this
section (Examples 4 and 5), for illustrations of the application of this paragraph
(f)(4)(v).
(5) Relief for certain failures to comply. This paragraph (f)(5) provides relief
if paragraph (f)(4)(i)(B)(2) of this section
would apply but for the U.S. transferor’s failure to provide the information
required by paragraph (f)(4)(i)(B) of this
section (a “failure to comply”). When a
failure to comply occurs, the subsequent
disposition of the transferred intangible
property is generally subject to paragraphs
(f)(3) and (f)(4)(i)(A) of this section, and
not paragraph (f)(4)(i)(B)(2) of this section. Nevertheless, a failure to comply is
May 22, 2023
deemed not to have occurred (regardless
of whether the U.S. transferor continued
to include amounts in gross income under
§1.367(d)-1T(c) or (e) after the subsequent
disposition), and the requirements of paragraph (f)(4)(i)(B) of this section are treated
as satisfied as of the date of the subsequent
disposition if, promptly after the U.S.
transferor becomes aware of the failure,
the U.S. transferor provides such information and provides a reasonable explanation
for its failure to comply to the Director of
Field Operations, Cross Border Activities
Practice Area of Large Business & International (or any successor to the roles and
responsibilities of such position, as appropriate). Additionally, the U.S. transferor
must timely file an amended return for the
taxable year in which the subsequent disposition occurred (and, if applicable, for
each taxable year starting with the taxable
year immediately after the taxable year in
which the subsequent disposition occurred
and ending with the taxable year in which
the U.S. transferor seeks relief under this
paragraph (f)(5)) that includes the information required by paragraph (f)(4)(i)
(B) of this section. If any taxable year of
the U.S. transferor is under examination
when an amended return is filed, a copy
of the amended return (or, if applicable,
amended returns) must be provided to the
Internal Revenue Service personnel conducting the examination.
(6) Examples—(i) Assumed facts. For
purposes of the examples in paragraph (f)
(6)(ii) of this section, and except where
otherwise indicated, the following facts
are assumed.
(A) USP and USS are domestic corporations that each use a calendar taxable
year.
(B) TFC is a foreign corporation whose
functional currency is the U.S. dollar.
(C) In year 1, USP transfers intangible property, as defined in section 367(d)
(4), with a $0 adjusted basis, to TFC in
a section 351 exchange (the “transferred
IP”), and such transfer is subject to section
367(d).
(D) Each annual inclusion (including
any amount described in §1.367(d)-1T(f)
(1)(ii)) is taken into account under section
367(d)(2)(A)(ii)(I) and §1.367(d)-1T(c)
(1).
(E) Any subsequent transfer or disposition of stock of TFC or the transferred IP
868
occurs within the useful life of the transferred IP.
(F) All transactions are respected under
general principles of tax law.
(ii) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the application of paragraph (f)
(4) of this section and other paragraphs of
this section that relate to paragraph (f)(4).
(A) Example 1: Complete liquidation of transferee foreign corporation into a qualified domestic
person—(1) Facts. In year 2, USP transfers all the
stock of TFC to USS, a related person within the
meaning of §1.367(d)-1T(h) and paragraph (h)(2)(ii)
of this section, in a section 351 exchange to which
§1.367(d)-1T(e)(1) applies (the “year 2 transfer”). In
year 3, TFC distributes all its property (including the
transferred IP) to USS pursuant to a complete liquidation to which sections 332 and 337 apply (the
“year 3 liquidation”). The all earnings and profits amount determined under §1.367(b)-2(d) with
respect to the stock of TFC held by USS is $0. The
information described in §1.6038B-1(d)(2) is provided by USS for the taxable year in which the year
3 liquidation occurs.
(2) Analysis—(i) The year 2 transfer. Because
the year 2 transfer involves a transfer of all the
stock of TFC by USP (the initial U.S. transferor) to
a related U.S. person (USS), under §1.367(d)-1T(e)
(1)(i) USS (a successor U.S. transferor) is treated as
receiving the right to receive a proportionate share of
the contingent annual payments that USP would have
otherwise taken into account under §1.367(d)-1T(c).
As determined under §1.367(d)-1T(e)(4), USS’s
proportionate share of such payments is 100 percent. Accordingly, USS will annually include in its
gross income the full amount of each of the annual
payments that USP would otherwise have taken into
account under §1.367(d)-1T(c) over the useful life
of the transferred IP, and USP will not recognize any
gain upon the year 2 transfer. See §1.367(d)-1T(e)
(1)(ii) and (iii).
(ii) The year 3 liquidation. The year 3 liquidation results in a subsequent disposition of the
transferred IP to USS. USS, a U.S. person treated
as the U.S. transferor pursuant to §1.367(d)-1T(e)
(1), is a qualified domestic person within the meaning of paragraph (f)(4)(iii) of this section. Pursuant
to paragraph (f)(4)(i)(A) of this section, USS must
recognize the amount of gain described in paragraph
(f)(4)(ii) of this section. Because the year 3 liquidation is a complete liquidation to which sections 332
and 337 apply, the intangible property is transferred
basis property (as defined in section 7701(a)(43)
and determined without regard to section 367(d),
this section, and §1.367(d)-1T), and therefore paragraph (f)(4)(ii)(A) applies to determine the amount
of any gain USS must recognize. Because TFC does
not recognize gain with respect to the transferred
IP (regardless of the adjusted basis in the intangible property) by reason of the year 3 liquidation,
the amount of gain described in paragraph (f)(4)(ii)
(A) of this section is $0. Accordingly, USS does not
recognize gain pursuant to paragraph (f)(4)(i)(A)
of this section by reason of the year 3 liquidation.
Additionally, because USS provides the information described in §1.6038B-1(d)(2), paragraph (f)(4)
(i)(B) of this section applies to the year 3 liquida-
Bulletin No. 2023–21
tion. USS therefore recognizes a deemed payment
representing the part of USS’s taxable year during
which TFC held the transferred IP pursuant to paragraph (f)(4)(i)(B)(1) of this section, and the required
adjustments described in paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this
section and §1.367(d)-1T(c)(2)(i) apply as to the
deemed payment. Also, because USS does not recognize gain pursuant to paragraph (f)(4)(i)(A) of this
section, the required adjustments described in paragraph (f)(2) of this section do not apply. Pursuant to
paragraph (f)(4)(i)(B)(2) of this section, after taking
the deemed payment into account, the transferred IP
is no longer subject to section 367(d), this section,
and §1.367(d)-1T. Finally, pursuant to paragraph (f)
(4)(iv)(A) of this section, USS’s adjusted basis in the
transferred IP is $0, which is equal to USP’s former
adjusted basis in the transferred IP ($0), increased by
the greater of the amount of gain recognized by USS
under paragraph (f)(4)(i)(A) of this section ($0) or
the amount of gain recognized by TFC upon the year
3 distribution ($0).
(B) Example 2: Taxable distribution of the transferred intangible property to a qualified domestic
person—(1) Facts. The facts are the same as in
paragraph (f)(6)(ii)(A) of this section (Example 1),
except that, instead of in year 3 TFC distributing all
its property to USS pursuant to a complete liquidation, in year 3 TFC distributes the transferred IP to
USS in a distribution described in section 311(b)
when the fair market value of the transferred IP is
$100x (the “year 3 distribution”). TFC’s adjusted
basis in the transferred IP immediately before the
distribution is $0.
(2) Analysis. The consequence of the year 2
transfer is the same as described in paragraph (f)
(6)(ii)(A)(2)(i) of this section (Example 1). Like
the consequences described in paragraph (f)(6)
(ii)(A)(2) of this section (Example 1), the year
3 distribution is a subsequent disposition of the
transferred IP to USS, a qualified domestic person.
Pursuant to paragraph (f)(4)(i)(A) of this section,
USS must recognize the amount of gain described
in paragraph (f)(4)(ii) of this section. Because the
year 3 distribution is described in section 311(b)
the intangible property is not transferred basis
property (as defined in section 7701(a)(43) and
determined without regard to section 367(d), this
section, and §1.367(d)-1T), and therefore USS
must recognize $100x gain under paragraph (f)
(4)(ii)(B) of this section. The $100x gain amount
equals the excess of the fair market value of the
transferred IP on the date of the year 3 distribution ($100x) over USP’s former adjusted basis in
the property ($0). TFC, because of USS’s gain
recognition under paragraph (f)(4)(i)(A) of this
section, reduces (but not below zero) the portion
of its earnings and profits and gross income arising
by reason of the year 3 distribution by the amount
of such gain under paragraph (f)(2)(i) of this section. Specifically, because the year 3 distribution
requires USS to recognize $100x of gain, TFC
reduces the portion of its earnings and profits and
gross income that arise by reason of the year 3 distribution, which is $100x (the excess of the fair
market value of the transferred IP ($100x) over
TFC’s adjusted basis in the transferred IP ($0)),
by $100x (the amount of gain USS recognizes
pursuant to paragraph (f)(4)(i)(A) of this section).
Bulletin No. 2023–21
As a result, after taking into account the reduction, TFC has no earnings and profits or gross
income that arise by reason of the year 3 distribution. Furthermore, USS may establish an account
receivable from TFC equal to $100x under paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this section. Additionally, and
as described in paragraph (f)(6)(ii)(A)(2) of this
section (Example 1), pursuant to paragraph (f)(4)
(i)(B)(1) of this section, USS recognizes a deemed
payment for the portion of USS’s taxable year
during which TFC held the transferred IP, and the
required adjustments described in paragraph (c)(2)
(ii) of this section and §1.367(d)-1T(c)(2) apply
to this deemed payment. After taking these consequences into account, pursuant to paragraph (f)
(4)(i)(B)(2) of this section, the transferred IP is no
longer subject to section 367(d), this section, and
§1.367(d)-1T. Finally, pursuant to paragraph (f)(4)
(iv)(B) of this section, USS’s adjusted basis in the
transferred IP is $100x, which is the fair market
value of the transferred IP on the date of the year
3 distribution.
(C) Example 3: Qualified domestic person’s
basis in intangible property when intangible property is repatriated in an exchange described in
section 351(b)—(1) Facts. The facts are the same as
in paragraph (f)(6)(ii)(A) of this section (Example
1), except that the transfer of stock of TFC to USS
in year 2 does not occur and instead of the year 3
liquidation, in year 3 TFC transfers the intangible
property to USS (a qualified domestic person as
defined in paragraph (f)(4)(iii) of this section) in an
exchange described in section 351(b) pursuant to
which TFC recognizes $50x of gain and USP recognizes $50x of gain under paragraph (f)(4)(i)(A) of
this section (the “year 3 exchange”).
(2) Analysis. Pursuant to paragraph (f)(4)(iv)(A)
of this section, USS’s adjusted basis in the intangible
property is $50x, which is the amount equal to the
lesser of USP’s former adjusted basis in the property
($0) or TFC’s adjusted basis in the property ($0),
increased by the greater of the amount of gain recognized by USP under paragraph (f)(4)(i)(A) of this
section ($50x) or the amount of gain recognized by
TFC upon the year 3 exchange ($50x).
(D) Example 4: Repatriation as part of a series
of related transactions culminating in transfer to a
foreign corporation—(1) Facts. The facts are the
same as in paragraph (f)(6)(ii)(A)(1) of this section (Example 1), except that the year 3 liquidation
occurs as part of a series of related transactions pursuant to which USS transfers the transferred IP that
it receives from TFC to a related foreign corporation
(FC1) in exchange for stock in FC1.
(2) Analysis. Because the year 3 liquidation
occurs as part of a series of related transactions
pursuant to which the transferred IP is ultimately
contributed to a FC1, a foreign corporation, and
because a foreign corporation is not a qualified
domestic person pursuant to paragraph (f)(4)(iii)
of this section, then, under paragraph (f)(4)(v) of
this section, the year 3 liquidation is not treated as
a subsequent disposition described in paragraph (f)
(4)(i) of this section, but is instead treated as a subsequent disposition described in paragraph (f)(3) of
this section.
(E) Example 5: Repatriation as part of a series
of related transactions culminating in transfer to
869
a qualified domestic person—(1) Facts. The facts
are the same as in paragraph (f)(6)(ii)(B)(1) of this
section (Example 2), except that the year 3 distribution occurs as part of a series of related transactions
pursuant to which USS disposes of the transferred IP
that it receives from TFC to USP.
(2) Analysis. Because the year 3 distribution
occurs as part of a series of related transactions pursuant to which the transferred IP is distributed to
USP, and because USP is a qualified domestic person pursuant to paragraph (f)(4)(iii) of this section,
paragraph (f)(4)(v) of this section does not prevent
paragraph (f)(4)(i) of this section from applying to the
year 3 distribution. Accordingly, the consequences
under section 367(d) of the year 3 distribution are
the same as those described in paragraph (f)(6)(ii)(B)
(2) of this section (Example 2), and the consequences
of the subsequent disposition of the transferred IP by
USS to USP are determined after applying paragraph
(f)(4) of this section to the transfer of the transferred
IP by TFC to USS.
(g) Special rules—(1) Establishment of
accounts receivable. For further guidance,
see §1.367(d)-1T(g)(1).
(2) Election to treat transfer as sale.
For further guidance, see §1.367(d)-1T(g)
(2) introductory text.
*****
(ii) For further guidance, see §1.3671T(g)(2)(ii) through (g)(2)(iii)(D).
(iii) [Reserved]
(A) through (D) [Reserved]
*****
(4) Coordination with section 482. For
further guidance, see § 1.367(d)-1T(g)(4).
(5) Determination of fair market value.
For further guidance, see §1.367(d)-1T(g)
(5).
(6) Anti-abuse rule. For further guidance, see §1.367(d)-1T(g)(6).
(h) Related person. For further guidance, see §1.367(d)-1T(h) introductory
text and (h)(1).
(1) [Reserved]
(2) For further guidance, see
§1.367(d)-1T(h)(2) introductory text and
(h)(2)(i).
(i) [Reserved]
(ii) Section 1563 applies (for purposes
of section 267(f)) without regard to section 1563(b)(2).
(i) Effective date. For further guidance,
see §1.367(d)-1T(i).
(j) Applicability dates—(1) In general.
This section applies to transfers occurring
on or after September 14, 2015, and to
transfers occurring before September 14,
2015, resulting from entity classification
elections made under § 301.7701-3 of this
chapter that are filed on or after September
May 22, 2023
14, 2015. For transfers occurring before
this section is applicable, see § 1.367(d)1T as contained in 26 CFR part 1 revised
as of April 1, 2016.
(2) Certain subsequent dispositions
of intangible property. Paragraphs (c)(2)
(ii), (e)(2)(ii), (f)(2) through (5), and (h)
(2)(ii) of this section apply to subsequent
dispositions of intangible property occurring on or after [date of publication of
final regulations in the Federal Register].
For subsequent dispositions of intangible
property occurring before [date of publication of final regulations in the Federal
Register], see §1.367(d)-1T (as contained
in 26 CFR part 1, revised as of April 1,
2022).
§1.367(d)-1T [Amended]
Par. 4. Section 1.367(d)-1T is amended
by:
1. Removing “; and” at the end of paragraph (c)(2)(i) and adding a period in its
place.
2. Removing and reserving paragraphs
(c)(2)(ii), (e)(2)(ii), and (f)(2) and (3).
3. Removing “; and” at the end of paragraph (h)(2)(i) and adding a period in its
place.
4. Removing and reserving paragraph
(h)(2)(ii).
§1.367(e)-2 [Amended]
Par. 5. Section 1.367(e)-2 is amended
by removing the language “section 936(h)
(3)(B)” in the last sentence of paragraph
(b)(2)(i)(B) and adding the language “section 367(d)(4)” in its place.
Par. 6. Section 1.904-4 is amended
by adding paragraph (f)(2)(vi)(D)(4)
and revising paragraph (q)(3) to read as
follows:
§1.904-4 Separate application of
section 904 with respect to certain
categories of income.
*****
(f) * * *
(2) * * *
(vi) * * *
(D) * * *
(4) Multiple transfers of intangible
property. If the same intangible property is transferred in a series of transfers
May 22, 2023
described in paragraph (f)(2)(vi)(D)(1)
of this section, each successive transfer
is separately subject to the provisions of
paragraph (f)(2)(vi)(D)(1) and will not
terminate or otherwise affect the application of paragraph (f)(2)(vi)(D)(1) to a
prior transfer described in paragraph (f)
(2)(vi)(D)(1).
*****
(q) * * *
(3) Except as provided in the following sentence, paragraph (f) of this section
applies to taxable years that begin after
December 31, 2019, and end on or after
November 2, 2020. Paragraph (f)(vi)
(D)(4) of this section applies to taxable
years that begin on or after [date of publication of final regulations in the Federal
Register].
Par. 7. Section 1.951A-2 is amended
by revising paragraph (c)(2) to read as
follows:
§1.951A-2 Tested income and tested
loss.
*****
(c) * * *
(2) Determination of gross income
and allowable deductions. For purposes
of determining tested income and tested
loss, the gross income and allowable
deductions of a controlled foreign corporation for a CFC inclusion year are
determined under the rules of § 1.952-2
for determining the subpart F income
of the controlled foreign corporation,
except, for a controlled foreign corporation which is engaged in the business of
reinsuring or issuing insurance or annuity
contracts and which, if it were a domestic
corporation engaged only in such business, would be taxable as an insurance
company to which subchapter L of chapter 1 of the Code applies, substituting
“the rules of sections 953 and 954(i)” for
“the principles of §§ 1.953-4 and 1.9535” in § 1.952-2(b)(2).
*****
Par. 8. Section 1.951A-7 is amended
by adding paragraph (e) to read as follows:
§1.951A-7 Applicability dates.
*****
(e) Determination of gross income
and allowable deductions. Section
870
1.951A-2(c)(2) applies to taxable years
of foreign corporations ending on or after
[date of publication of final regulations
in the Federal Register], and to taxable
years of United States shareholders in
which or with which such taxable years
end. For taxable years of foreign corporations ending before [date of publication
of final regulations in the Federal Register], and to taxable years of United States
shareholders in which or with which such
taxable years end, see §1.951A-2(c)(2)(i)
and (ii) as contained in 26 CFR part 1,
revised as of April 1, 2022.
Par. 9. Section 1.6038B-1 is amended
by:
1. Removing reserved paragraphs (d)
(1) through (1)(iii);
2. Adding paragraphs (d) heading and
(d)(1) introductory text and reserved paragraphs (d)(1)(i) through (iii);
3. Removing reserved paragraphs (d)
(1)(viii) through (d)(2); and
4. Adding paragraphs (d)(1)(viii), (d)
(2), and (g)(8).
The additions read as follows:
§1.6038B-1 Reporting of certain
transfers to foreign corporations.
*****
(d) Transfers subject to section
367(d)—(1) Initial transfer. For further
guidance, see § 1.6038B–1T(d)(1) introductory text through (d)(1)(iii).
(i) through (iii) [Reserved]
*****
(viii) Other intangibles. For further
guidance, see § 1.6038B–1T(d)(1)(viii).
(2)
Subsequent
transfers.
For
additional, see § 1.6038B–1T(d)(2) introductory text through (d)(2)(ii).
(i) through (ii) [Reserved]
(iii) Subsequent transfer. Except for
a subsequent transfer described in paragraph (d)(2)(iv) of this section, provide
the following information concerning the
subsequent transfer:
(A) For further guidance, see
§ 1.6038B–1T(d)(2)(iii)(A) through (C).
(B) through (C) [Reserved]
(iv) Subsequent transfer of intangible
property to a qualified domestic person. Provide the following information
concerning a subsequent transfer of intangible property described in §1.367(d)-1(f)
(4)(i):
Bulletin No. 2023–21
(A) A statement providing that
§1.367(d)-1(f)(4)(i)(B) applies to the subsequent transfer;
(B) A general description of the subsequent transfer and any wider transaction
of which it forms a part, including the
U.S. transferor’s former adjusted basis
in the intangible property and the transferee foreign corporation’s adjusted basis
in the intangible property (as determined
immediately before the subsequent transfer), the amount and computation of
any gain recognized by the U.S. transferor under §1.367(d)-1(f)(4)(i)(A), and
a description of whether the intangible
property was, or is expected to be, subsequently transferred to one or more other
persons (as described in §1.367(d)-1(f)
(4)(v));
(C) A description of the intangible
property;
(D) A copy of the Form 926 with respect
to the original transfer of the intangible
Bulletin No. 2023–21
property and any attachments identifying
the intangible property as within the scope
of section 367(d);
(E) The name, address, and taxpayer
identification number of the qualified
domestic person that receives the intangible property, including a statement
describing the relationship between the
U.S. transferor and the qualified domestic
person, and, if applicable, such information regarding any other persons described
in §1.367(d)-1(f)(4)(v); and
(F) Any other information as may be
prescribed by the Commissioner in publications, forms, instructions, or other
guidance.
*****
(g) * * *
(8) Paragraphs (d)(2)(iii) introductory
text and (d)(2)(iv) of this section apply
to transfers occurring on or after [date of
publication of final regulations in the Federal Register].
871
Par. 10. Section 1.6038B-1T is
amended by revising paragraph (d)(2)(iii)
introductory text to read as follows:
§ 1.6038B-1T Reporting of certain
transactions to foreign corporations
(temporary).
*****
(d) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) Subsequent transfer. For further
guidance, see § 1.6038B–1(d)(2)(iii)
introductory text:
*****
Douglas W. O’Donnell,
Deputy Commissioner for Services
and Enforcement.
(Filed by the Office of the Federal Register May 02,
2023, 8:45a.m., and published in the issue of the
Federal Register for May 03, 2023, 88 FR 27819)
May 22, 2023
Definition of Terms
Revenue rulings and revenue procedures
(hereinafter referred to as “rulings”) that
have an effect on previous rulings use the
following defined terms to describe the
effect:
Amplified describes a situation where
no change is being made in a prior published position, but the prior position is
being extended to apply to a variation of
the fact situation set forth therein. Thus, if
an earlier ruling held that a principle applied to A, and the new ruling holds that
the same principle also applies to B, the
earlier ruling is amplified. (Compare with
modified, below).
Clarified is used in those instances
where the language in a prior ruling is being made clear because the language has
caused, or may cause, some confusion. It
is not used where a position in a prior ruling is being changed.
Distinguished describes a situation
where a ruling mentions a previously published ruling and points out an essential
difference between them.
Modified is used where the substance
of a previously published position is being
changed. Thus, if a prior ruling held that a
principle applied to A but not to B, and the
new ruling holds that it applies to both A
and B, the prior ruling is modified because
it corrects a published position. (Compare
with amplified and clarified, above).
Obsoleted describes a previously published ruling that is not considered determinative with respect to future transactions.
This term is most commonly used in a ruling
that lists previously published rulings that
are obsoleted because of changes in laws or
regulations. A ruling may also be obsoleted
because the substance has been included in
regulations subsequently adopted.
Revoked describes situations where the
position in the previously published ruling
is not correct and the correct position is
being stated in a new ruling.
Superseded describes a situation where
the new ruling does nothing more than
restate the substance and situation of a
previously published ruling (or rulings).
Thus, the term is used to republish under
the 1986 Code and regulations the same
position published under the 1939 Code
and regulations. The term is also used
when it is desired to republish in a single
ruling a series of situations, names, etc.,
that were previously published over a
period of time in separate rulings. If the
new ruling does more than restate the substance of a prior ruling, a combination of
terms is used. For example, modified and
superseded describes a situation where the
substance of a previously published ruling
is being changed in part and is continued
without change in part and it is desired to
restate the valid portion of the previously published ruling in a new ruling that is
self contained. In this case, the previously
published ruling is first modified and then,
as modified, is superseded.
Supplemented is used in situations in
which a list, such as a list of the names of
countries, is published in a ruling and that
list is expanded by adding further names
in subsequent rulings. After the original
ruling has been supplemented several
times, a new ruling may be published that
includes the list in the original ruling and
the additions, and supersedes all prior rulings in the series.
Suspended is used in rare situations to
show that the previous published rulings
will not be applied pending some future
action such as the issuance of new or
amended regulations, the outcome of cases in litigation, or the outcome of a Service study.
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations in current
use and formerly used will appear in
material published in the Bulletin.
A—Individual.
Acq.—Acquiescence.
B—Individual.
BE—Beneficiary.
BK—Bank.
B.T.A.—Board of Tax Appeals.
C—Individual.
C.B.—Cumulative Bulletin.
CFR—Code of Federal Regulations.
CI—City.
COOP—Cooperative.
Ct.D.—Court Decision.
CY—County.
D—Decedent.
DC—Dummy Corporation.
DE—Donee.
Del. Order—Delegation Order.
DISC—Domestic International Sales Corporation.
DR—Donor.
E—Estate.
EE—Employee.
E.O.—Executive Order.
ER—Employer.
Bulletin No. 2023–21
ERISA—Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
EX—Executor.
F—Fiduciary.
FC—Foreign Country.
FICA—Federal Insurance Contributions Act.
FISC—Foreign International Sales Company.
FPH—Foreign Personal Holding Company.
F.R.—Federal Register.
FUTA—Federal Unemployment Tax Act.
FX—Foreign corporation.
G.C.M.—Chief Counsel’s Memorandum.
GE—Grantee.
GP—General Partner.
GR—Grantor.
IC—Insurance Company.
I.R.B.—Internal Revenue Bulletin.
LE—Lessee.
LP—Limited Partner.
LR—Lessor.
M—Minor.
Nonacq.—Nonacquiescence.
O—Organization.
P—Parent Corporation.
PHC—Personal Holding Company.
PO—Possession of the U.S.
PR—Partner.
PRS—Partnership.
i
PTE—Prohibited Transaction Exemption.
Pub. L.—Public Law.
REIT—Real Estate Investment Trust.
Rev. Proc.—Revenue Procedure.
Rev. Rul.—Revenue Ruling.
S—Subsidiary.
S.P.R.—Statement of Procedural Rules.
Stat.—Statutes at Large.
T—Target Corporation.
T.C.—Tax Court.
T.D.—Treasury Decision.
TFE—Transferee.
TFR—Transferor.
T.I.R.—Technical Information Release.
TP—Taxpayer.
TR—Trust.
TT—Trustee.
U.S.C.—United States Code.
X—Corporation.
Y—Corporation.
Z—Corporation.
May 22, 2023
Numerical Finding List1
Bulletin 2023–21
Announcements:
2023-2, 2023-2 I.R.B. 344
2023-1, 2023-3 I.R.B. 422
2023-3, 2023-5 I.R.B. 447
2023-4, 2023-7 I.R.B. 470
2023-5, 2023-9 I.R.B. 499
2023-6, 2023-9 I.R.B. 501
2023-8, 2023-14 I.R.B. 632
2023-9, 2023-15 I.R.B. 639
2023-10, 2023-16 I.R.B. 663
2023-7, 2023-17 I.R.B. 797
2023-11, 2023-17 I.R.B. 798
2023-12, 2023-17 I.R.B. 799
2023-13, 2023-18 I.R.B. 833
2023-14, 2023-19 I.R.B. 853
2023-16, 2023-20 I.R.B. 854
2023-15, 2023-21 I.R.B. 856
AOD:
2023-1, 2023-10 I.R.B. 502
2023-2, 2023-11 I.R.B. 529
Notices:
2023-4, 2023-2 I.R.B. 321
2023-5, 2023-2 I.R.B. 324
2023-6, 2023-2 I.R.B. 328
2023-8, 2023-2 I.R.B. 341
2023-1, 2023-3 I.R.B. 373
2023-2, 2023-3 I.R.B. 374
2023-3, 2023-3 I.R.B. 388
2023-7, 2023-3 I.R.B. 390
2023-9, 2023-3 I.R.B. 402
2023-10, 2023-3 I.R.B. 403
2023-11, 2023-3 I.R.B. 404
2023-12, 2023-6 I.R.B. 450
2023-13, 2023-6 I.R.B. 454
2023-16, 2023-8 I.R.B. 479
2023-17, 2023-10 I.R.B. 505
2023-18, 2023-10 I.R.B. 508
2023-20, 2023-10 I.R.B. 523
2023-19, 2023-11 I.R.B. 560
2023-21, 2023-11 I.R.B. 563
2023-22, 2023-12 I.R.B. 569
2023-23, 2023-13 I.R.B. 571
2023-24, 2023-13 I.R.B. 571
2023-26, 2023-13 I.R.B. 577
2023-25, 2023-14 I.R.B. 629
2023-27, 2023-15 I.R.B. 634
2023-28, 2023-15 I.R.B. 635
2023-31, 2023-16 I.R.B. 661
2023-30, 2023-17 I.R.B. 766
2023-33, 2023-18 I.R.B. 803
2023-34, 2023-19 I.R.B. 837
2023-36, 2023-21 I.R.B. 855
Proposed Regulations:
REG-100442-22, 2023-3 I.R.B. 423
REG-146537-06, 2023-3 I.R.B. 436
REG-114666-22, 2023-4 I.R.B. 437
REG 122286-18, 2023-11 I.R.B. 565
REG-120653-22, 2023-15 I.R.B. 640
REG-105954-22, 2023-16 I.R.B. 713
REG-120080-22, 2023-16 I.R.B. 746
REG 109309-22, 2023-17 I.R.B. 770
REG 121709-19, 2023-17 I.R.B. 789
REG-124064-19, 2023-17 I.R.B. 789
Revenue Procedures:
2023-1, 2023-1 I.R.B. 1
2023-2, 2023-1 I.R.B. 120
2023-3, 2023-1 I.R.B. 144
2023-4, 2023-1 I.R.B. 162
2023-5, 2023-1 I.R.B. 265
2023-7, 2023-1 I.R.B. 305
2023-8, 2023-3 I.R.B. 407
2023-10, 2023-3 I.R.B. 411
2023-11, 2023-3 I.R.B. 417
2023-14, 2023-6 I.R.B. 466
2023-9, 2023-7 I.R.B. 471
2023-13, 2023-13 I.R.B. 581
2023-17, 2023-13 I.R.B. 604
2023-18, 2023-13 I.R.B. 605
2023-19, 2023-13 I.R.B. 626
2023-20, 2023-15 I.R.B. 636
2023-12, 2023-17 I.R.B. 768
2023-15, 2023-18 I.R.B. 806
2023-21, 2023-19 I.R.B. 837
2023-22, 2023-19 I.R.B. 838
Revenue Rulings:
2023-1, 2023-2 I.R.B. 309
2023-3, 2023-6 I.R.B. 448
2023-4, 2023-9 I.R.B. 480
2023-5, 2023-10 I.R.B. 503
2023-6, 2023-14 I.R.B. 627
2023-7, 2023-15 I.R.B. 633
2023-2, 2023-16 I.R.B. 658
2023-8, 2023-18 I.R.B. 801
2023-9, 2023-19 I.R.B. 835
Treasury Decisions:
9970, 2023-2 I.R.B. 311
9771, 2023-3 I.R.B. 346
9772, 2023-11 I.R.B. 530
9773, 2023-11 I.R.B. 557
A cumulative list of all revenue rulings, revenue procedures, Treasury decisions, etc., published in Internal Revenue Bulletins 2022–27 through 2022–52 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin
2022–52, dated December 27, 2022.
1
May 22, 2023
ii
Bulletin No. 2023–21
Finding List of Current Actions on
Previously Published Items1
Bulletin 2023–21
A cumulative list of all revenue rulings, revenue procedures, Treasury decisions, etc., published in Internal Revenue Bulletins 2022–27 through 2022–52 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin
2022–52, dated December 27, 2022.
1
Bulletin No. 2023–21
iii
May 22, 2023
Internal Revenue Service
Washington, DC 20224
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use, $300
INTERNAL REVENUE BULLETIN
The Introduction at the beginning of this issue describes the purpose and content of this publication. The weekly Internal Revenue
Bulletins are available at www.irs.gov/irb/.
We Welcome Comments About the Internal Revenue Bulletin
If you have comments concerning the format or production of the Internal Revenue Bulletin or suggestions for improving it,
we would be pleased to hear from you. You can email us your suggestions or comments through the IRS Internet Home Page
www.irs.gov) or write to the Internal Revenue Service, Publishing Division, IRB Publishing Program Desk, 1111 Constitution Ave.
NW, IR-6230 Washington, DC 20224.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.