Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 124 / Thursday, June 28, 2007 / Notices

Agency decision

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 124 / Thursday, June 28, 2007 / Notices

ACTION: Notice of revision of listing of

covered facilities.

SUMMARY: Periodically, the Department

of Energy (‘‘Department’’ or ‘‘DOE’’)

publishes a list of facilities covered

under the Energy Employees

Occupational Illness Compensation

Program Act of 2000 (‘‘Act’’), Title 36 of

Public Law 106–398 (66 FR 4003; 66 FR

31218). This Notice revises the previous

lists because it has been found that

some designated atomic weapons

employers (AWE) should not have been

so designated. Previous lists were

published on November 30, 2005,

August 23, 2004, July 21, 2003,

December 27, 2002, June 11, 2001, and

January 17, 2001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Patricia R. Worthington, PhD, Director,

Office of Health and Safety (HS–10),

(301) 903–5392.

ADDRESSES: The Department welcomes

comments on this Notice. Comments

should be addressed to: Patricia R.

Worthington, PhD, Director, Office of

Health and Safety (HS–10), U.S.

Department of Energy, 1000

Independence Avenue, SW.,

Washington, DC 20585.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

Purpose

Issued in Washington, DC, on June 14,

2007.

Glenn S. Podonsky,

Chief Health, Safety and Security

Officer,Office of Health, Safety and Security.

[FR Doc. E7–12511 Filed 6–27–07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–50–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[IC07–549B–001, FERC 549B]

Commission Information Collection

Activities, ProposedCollection;

Comment Request; Extension

June 20, 2007.

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice.

The Act establishes a program to

provide compensation to certain

employees who developed illnesses as a

result of their employment with DOE,

its predecessor Agencies, and certain of

its contractors and subcontractors.

Section 3621 defines an AWE as an

entity, other than the United States, that

(a) Processed or produced, for use by the

United States, material that emitted

radiation and was used in the

production of an atomic weapon,

excluding uranium mining and milling;

and (b) is designated by the Secretary of

Energy as an AWE for the purposes of

the compensation program. Section

3621 goes on to define an AWE facility

as a facility, owned by an AWE, that is

or was used to process or produce, for

use by the United States, material that

emitted radiation and was used in the

production of an atomic weapon,

excluding uranium mining or milling.

It has recently come to the attention

of the Department that a number of

entities previously designated as AWEs

failed the basic definitional test for an

AWE because the designated entities

were Agencies of the U.S. Government.

Since the definition of an AWE

specifically excludes the United States,

these previously made designations are

invalid. To make it clear that these

entities are not covered under the Act,

VerDate Aug<31>2005

this Notice formally removes the

following entities from the list.

• Naval Research Laboratory,

previously designated as an AWE in the

District of Columbia.

• Philadelphia Navy Yard, previously

designated as an AWE in Philadelphia,

Pennsylvania.

• Watertown Arsenal (Building 421),

previously designated as an AWE in

Watertown, Massachusetts.

18:23 Jun 27, 2007

Jkt 211001

SUMMARY: In compliance with the

requirements of section 3507 of the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44

U.S.C. 3507, the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission (Commission)

has submitted the information

collection described below to the Office

of Management and Budget (OMB) for

review and extension of this

information collection requirement. Any

interested person may file comments

directly with OMB and should address

a copy of those comments to the

Commission as explained below. The

Commission did not receive any

comments in response to an earlier

Federal Register notice of March 19,

2007 (72 FR 12786–12787) and has

made a notation in its submission to

OMB.

DATES: Comments on the collection of

information are due by July 28, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Address comments on the

collection of information to the Office of

Management and Budget, Office of

Information and Regulatory Affairs,

Attention: Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission Desk Officer. Comments to

OMB should be filed electronically, c/o

oira_submission@omb.eop.gov and

include the OMB Control No. as a point

of reference. The Desk Officer may be

reached by telephone at 202–395–4650.

PO 00000

Frm 00028

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

35449

A copy of the comments should also be

sent to the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, Office of the Executive

Director, ED–34, Attention: Michael

Miller, 888 First Street, NE.,

Washington, DC 20426. Comments may

be filed either in paper format or

electronically. Those persons filing

electronically do not need to make a

paper filing. For paper filings an

original and 14 copies, of such

comments should be submitted to the

Secretary of the Commission, Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426

and should refer to Docket No. IC07–

549B–001.

Documents filed electronically via the

Internet must be prepared in

WordPerfect, MS Word, Portable

Document Format, or ASCII format. To

file the document, access the

Commission’s Web site at http://

www.ferc.gov and click on ‘‘Make an EFiling,’’ and then follow the instructions

for each screen. First time users will

have to establish a user name and

password. The Commission will send an

automatic acknowledgement to the

sender’s e-mail address upon receipt of

comments. User assistance for electronic

filings is available at 202–502–8258 or

by e-mail to efiling@ferc.gov. Comments

should not be submitted to this e-mail

address.

All comments may be viewed, printed

or downloaded remotely via the Internet

through FERC’s homepage using the

‘‘eLibrary’’ link. Enter the docket

number excluding the last three digits in

the docket number field to access the

document. For user assistance, contact

FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or tollfree at (866) 208–3676, or for TTY,

contact (202) 502–8659.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael Miller may be reached by

telephone at (202) 502–8415, by fax at

(202) 273–0873, and by e-mail at

michael.miller@ferc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Description

The information collection submitted

for OMB review contains the following:

1. Collection of Information: FERC

549B ‘‘Gas Pipeline Rates: Capacity

Information’’.

2. Sponsor: Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission.

3. Control No.: 1902–0169.

The Commission is now requesting

that OMB approve and extend the

expiration date for an additional three

years with no changes to the existing

collection. The information filed with

the Commission is mandatory.

4. Necessity of the Collection of

Information: Submission of the

E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM

28JNN1

35450

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 124 / Thursday, June 28, 2007 / Notices

information is necessary for the

Commission to carry out its

responsibilities in implementing the

statutory provisions of sections 4, 5, and

16 of the NGA, 15 U.S.C. 717c–717o,

Public Law 75–688, 52 Stat. 822 and 830

and Title III of the NGPA, 15 U.S.C.

3301–3432, Public Law 95–621.

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

Capacity Reports

On April 4, 1992, in Order No. 636,

the Commission established a capacity

release mechanism under which

shippers could release firm

transportation and storage capacity on

either a short or long term basis to other

shippers wanting to obtain capacity.

Pipelines posted available firm and

interruptible capacity information on

their electronic bulletin boards (EBBs)

to inform potential shippers. On

September 11, 1992, in Order No. 636–

A, the Commission determined, through

staff audits, that the efficiency of the

capacity release mechanism could be

enhanced by standardizing the content

and format of capacity release

information and the methods by which

shippers access this information, posted

to EBBs.

On April 4, 1995, through Order 577

(RM95–5–000), the Commission

amended §284.243(h) of its regulations

to allow shippers the ability to release

capacity without having to comply with

the Commission’s advance posting and

bidding requirements.

To create greater substitution between

different forms of capacity and to

enhance competition across the pipeline

grid, on February 25, 2000, in Order No.

637 RM98–10–000), the Commission

revised its capacity release regulations

regarding scheduling, segmentation and

flexible point rights, penalties, and

reporting requirements. This resulted in

more reliable capacity information

availability and price data that shippers

needed to make informed decisions in a

competitive market as well as to

improve shipper’s and the

Commission’s availability to monitor

marketplace behavior.

Index of Customers

In Order 581, issued September 28,

1995, the Commission established the

Index of Customers (IOC) information

requirement. The Index of Customers

had two functions, first, for analyzing

capacity held on pipelines and second,

for providing capacity information to

the market. The Index of Customers

information aids the capacity release

system by enabling shippers to identify

and locate those holding capacity rights

that the shippers may want to acquire.

The information was required to be

posted on the pipeline’s EBB and filed

VerDate Aug<31>2005

18:23 Jun 27, 2007

Jkt 211001

on electronic media with the

Commission. This first Index contained,

for all firm customers under contract as

of the first day of the calendar quarter,

the full legal name of the shipper, the

rate schedule number for which service

is contracted, the contract effective and

expiration dates, and the contract

quantities.

In Order 637, the Commission

required the following additional

information: the receipt and delivery

points held under contract and the

zones or segments in which the capacity

is held; the common transaction point

codes; the contract number; a shipper

identification number, such as DUNS;

an indication whether the contract

includes negotiated rates; the names of

any agents or asset managers that

control capacity in a pipeline rate zone;

and any affiliate relationship between

the pipeline and the holder of capacity.

The Index is now provided through a

quarterly filing on electronic media to

the Commission and is posted on

pipelines’ Internet Web sites.

5. Respondent Description: The

respondent universe currently

comprises 103 companies (on average)

subject to the Commission’s

jurisdiction. Capacity reports: 179,838

hours/2080 work hours per year ×

$122,137 = $10,560,035; Index of

Customers (IOC): 1,236 hours/2080

work hours per year × $122,137 =

$72,578 Total Costs = $10,632,613. The

estimated annual cost per respondent is:

Capacity Reports: $102,525; Index of

Customers: $705.

6. Estimated Burden: 181,074 total

hours, 103 respondents (average), 6

(Capacity Reports), 4 (Index of

Customers) responses per respondent,

and 291 (Capacity Reports), 3 (Index of

Customers) hours per response (rounded

off and average time)

7. Estimated Cost Burden to

respondents: 181,074 hours/2080 hours

per years × $122,137 per year =

$10,560,035. The cost per respondent is

equal to $102,525; Index of Customers:

$705.

Statutory Authority: Statutory provisions

of sections 4, 5 and 16 Natural Gas Act, 15

U.S.C. 717c–717o.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E7–12469 Filed 6–27–07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

PO 00000

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. RP07–413–001]

Columbia Gas Transmission

Corporation; Notice of Compliance

Filing

June 20, 2007.

Take notice that on June 18, 2007,

Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation

(Columbia) tendered for filing as part of

its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised

Volume No. 1, with an effective date of

August 1, 2007:

Seventh Revised Sheet No. 538

First Revised Sheet No. 538A

Third Revised Sheet No. 540

Columbia states that it is making this

filing in compliance with the

Commission’s Order in this docket,

issued June 5, 2007.

Any person desiring to protest this

filing must file in accordance with Rule

211 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR

385.211). Protests to this filing will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Such protests must be filed in

accordance with the provisions of

section 154.210 of the Commission’s

regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone

filing a protest must serve a copy of that

document on all the parties to the

proceeding.

The Commission encourages

electronic submission of protests in lieu

of paper using the ‘‘eFiling’’ link at

http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to

file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest to

the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,

Washington, DC 20426.

This filing is accessible on-line at

http://www.ferc.gov, using the

‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for

review in the Commission’s Public

Reference Room in Washington, DC.

There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the

Web site that enables subscribers to

receive e-mail notification when a

document is added to a subscribed

docket(s). For assistance with any FERC

Online service, please e-mail

FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call

(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call

(202) 502–8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E7–12472 Filed 6–27–07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

Frm 00029

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM

28JNN1

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.