mstockstill on PROD1PC68 with NOTICES (2006)

Agency decision

Ask Donna

What actually matters in this document.

Text

mstockstill on PROD1PC68 with NOTICES

26960

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Notices

e. Name of Project: The Warrior River

Project, which includes the Smith Dam

development.

f. Location: The proposed action will

take place at the Smith Dam

development at the former Castle Rock

Marina on Ryan Creek, which is a

tributary to Smith Lake located in

Cullman County, Alabama

approximately 11 stream miles above

the Smith Dam.

g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power

Act, 16 U.S.C. 791 (a) 825(r) and 799

and 801.

h. Applicant Contact: Mr. Keith E.

Bryant, Sr. Engineer; Alabama Power

Company Hydro Services; 600 18th

Street North, Birmingham, AL 35203;

(205) 257–1403.

i. FERC Contact: Any questions on

this notice should be addressed to Brian

Romanek at (202) 502–6175, or by email: Brian Romanek@ferc.gov.

j. Deadline for filing comments and or

motions: June 1, 2006.

All documents (original and eight

copies) should be filed with: Ms.

Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.

Please include the project number (P–

2165–025) on any comments or motions

filed. Comments, protests, and

interventions may be filed electronically

via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18

CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the

instructions on the Commission’s Web

site under the ‘‘e-Filing’’ link. The

Commission strongly encourages efilings.

k. Description of Request: The

licensee has requested Commission

approval to allow Crane Hill

Development, LLC. to install three

floating boat dock structures at the

former Castle Rock Marina, which is

presently closed. The new docks would

be for private use by residents of

Waterford Condominiums, a residential

community adjoining project land. The

new dock structure would consist of: (1)

Two covered docks, each measuring 58

feet wide by 136 feet long and will

accommodate 20 boats, each and; (2)

one partially covered dock structure,

measuring 58 feet wide by 123 feet long,

accommodating 18 boats. The total

number of boats accommodated would

be 58. The former marina had docks that

would accommodate 92 boats. In

addition, a one-fourth of an acre parking

area would be constructed as well as a

50-foot-long retaining wall around the

existing swimming pool.

l. Location of the Application: This

filing is available for review at the

Commission or may be viewed on the

Commission’s Web site at http://

www.ferc.gov, using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link.

VerDate Aug<31>2005

15:42 May 08, 2006

Jkt 208001

Enter the docket number excluding the

last three digits in the docket number

field to access the document. For

assistance, contact FERC Online

Support at

FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or tollfree at (866) 208–3676, or for TTY,

contact (202) 502–8659.

m. Individuals desiring to be included

on the Commission’s mailing list should

so indicate by writing to the Secretary

of the Commission.

n. Comments, Protests, or Motions to

Intervene: Anyone may submit

comments, a protest, or a motion to

intervene in accordance with the

requirements of Rules of Practice and

Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, 385.211,

385.214. In determining the appropriate

action to take, the Commission will

consider all protests or other comments

filed, but only those who file a motion

to intervene in accordance with the

Commission’s Rules may become a

party to the proceeding. Any comments,

protests, or motions to intervene must

be received on or before the specified

comment date for the particular

application.

o. Filing and Service of Responsive

Documents: Any filings must bear in all

capital letters the title ‘‘COMMENTS’’,

‘‘RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TERMS

AND CONDITIONS’’, ‘‘PROTEST’’, OR

‘‘MOTION TO INTERVENE’’, as

applicable, and the Project Number of

the particular application to which the

filing refers. A copy of any motion to

intervene must also be served upon each

representative of the Applicant

specified in the particular application.

p. Agency Comments: Federal, state,

and local agencies are invited to file

comments on the described

applications. A copy of the applications

may be obtained by agencies directly

from the Applicant. If an agency does

not file comments within the time

specified for filing comments, it will be

presumed to have no comments. One

copy of an agency’s comments must also

be sent to the Applicant’s

representatives.

Magalie R. Salas,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E6–6952 Filed 5–8–06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

PO 00000

Frm 00041

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. RM98–1–000]

Records Governing Off-the Record

Communications; Public Notice

May 2, 2006.

This constitutes notice, in accordance

with 18 CFR 385.2201(b), of the receipt

of prohibited and exempt off-the-record

communications.

Order No. 607 (64 FR 51222,

September 22, 1999) requires

Commission decisional employees, who

make or receive a prohibited or exempt

off-the-record communication relevant

to the merits of a contested proceeding,

to deliver to the Secretary of the

Commission, a copy of the

communication, if written, or a

summary of the substance of any oral

communication.

Prohibited communications are

included in a public, non-decisional file

associated with, but not a part of, the

decisional record of the proceeding.

Unless the Commission determines that

the prohibited communication and any

responses thereto should become a part

of the decisional record, the prohibited

off-the-record communication will not

be considered by the Commission in

reaching its decision. Parties to a

proceeding may seek the opportunity to

respond to any facts or contentions

made in a prohibited off-the-record

communication, and may request that

the Commission place the prohibited

communication and responses thereto

in the decisional record. The

Commission will grant such a request

only when it determines that fairness so

requires. Any person identified below as

having made a prohibited off-the-record

communication shall serve the

document on all parties listed on the

official service list for the applicable

proceeding in accordance with Rule

2010, 18 CFR 385.2010.

Exempt off-the-record

communications are included in the

decisional record of the proceeding,

unless the communication was with a

cooperating agency as described by 40

CFR 1501.6, made under 18 CFR

385.2201(e)(1)(v).

The following is a list of off-therecord communications recently

received by the Secretary of the

Commission. The communications

listed are grouped by docket numbers in

ascending order. These filings are

available for review at the Commission

in the Public Reference Room or may be

viewed on the Commission’s Web site at

http://www.ferc.gov using the eLibrary

E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM

09MYN1

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Notices

link. Enter the docket number,

excluding the last three digits, in the

docket number field to access the

document. For assistance, please contact

FERC, Online Support at

FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll

Docket Number

free at (866) 208–3676, or for TTY,

contact (202) 502–8659.

Date received

Prohibited:

1. EL05–102–002 ..............................................................................................

Exempt:

1. CP95–35–000 ................................................................................................

2. CP95–35–000 ................................................................................................

3. CP05–130–000 ..............................................................................................

4. EL03–180–000 ..............................................................................................

5. ER00–2268–011, EL05–10–003, ER99–4124–009, EL05–11–003, ER00–

3312–010, EL05–12–003 ER99–4122–012, EL05–13–003.

6. Same docket nos. as (5.) above ...................................................................

7. Same as (5.) above .......................................................................................

8. Same as (5.) above .......................................................................................

9. Same as (5.) above .......................................................................................

10 Same as (5.) above ........................................................................................

11. Same as (5.) above .......................................................................................

12. Same as (5.) above .......................................................................................

13. Project No. 459–128 .....................................................................................

14. Project No. 459–128 .....................................................................................

15. Project No. 1971–079 ...................................................................................

26961

Presenter or requester

4–24–06

Undisclosed.1

4–24–06

4–24–06

4–20–06

4–10–06

4–26–06

Carlos Reyes.

Ernesto Cordova.

J. C. Burton, John S. Kenyon.

Hon. Maria Cantwell.

Stanley H. Ashby.

4–26–06

4–26–06

4–26–06

4–26–06

4–26–06

4–26–06

4–25–06

3–20–06

4–19–06

4–24–06

William D. Baker.

James D. Downing.2

R.D. Justice.

Jackie Meck.

Elizabeth Story.

James R. Sweeney.

Jeffery J. Woner.3

Terry & Carol Welch.

Charles Clark.

Steve R. Brink, James A. Chandler.

1 E-mail communication sent to FERC staff member, Bryan Lee, from undisclosed source.

2 Mr. Downing submitted two filings in these dockets on behalf of the Electrical District Number Eight and McMullen Valley Water Conservation

& Drainage District.

3 Mr. Woner submitted two filings in these dockets on behalf of Harquahala Valley Power District and Aquila Irrigation District on 4–25–06 and

4–26–06, respectively.

Magalie R. Salas,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E6–6953 Filed 5–8–06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Western Area Power Administration

Construction and Operation of the

Sacramento Area Voltage Support

Project, Sacramento, Sutter, and

Placer Counties, CA

AGENCY: Western Area Power

Administration, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of Intent to prepare a

mstockstill on PROD1PC68 with NOTICES

Supplemental Environmental Impact

Statement (SEIS), and conduct scoping

meetings; Notice of Floodplain and

Wetlands Involvement.

SUMMARY: The Western Area Power

Administration (Western), Department

of Energy (DOE), intends to prepare a

Supplemental Environmental Impact

Statement (SEIS) to construct and

operate a transmission line for the

Sacramento Area Voltage Support (SVS)

Project (Project) in California. The

Sacramento Municipal Utility District

(SMUD) and the City of Roseville

(Roseville) will participate in a joint

SEIS and Environmental Impact Report

(EIR) to address the proposed

construction and operation of about 38

miles of 230-kilovolt (kV), new doublecircuit transmission line in the

Sacramento, California, area.

VerDate Aug<31>2005

15:42 May 08, 2006

Jkt 208001

Western prepared a Draft

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)

for the SVS in November 2002 and a

final EIS in September 2003. A Record

of Decision (ROD) was signed on

January 12, 2004. In the ROD, Western

made commitments to conduct air,

biological, and cultural surveys after

funding was secured. SMUD and

Roseville have since committed to share

in conducting more detailed Project

studies and are negotiating funding a

voltage support project. Additional

alternatives will be analyzed in this SVS

SEIS and EIR.

DATES: Open-house public scoping

meetings will be held June 5 and 7,

2006, from 4 to 7 p.m. Western invites

interested agencies, tribes,

organizations, and members of the

public to submit comments or

suggestions to assist in identifying

environmental issues and in

determining the appropriate scope of

the SEIS and EIR. The public scoping

period starts with the publication of this

notice in the Federal Register and will

continue until June 16, 2006. To be

assured consideration, all comments or

suggestions regarding the appropriate

scope must be received by the end of the

scoping period.

ADDRESSES: Open-house public scoping

meetings will be held June 5, 2006 (4 to

7 p.m.), at the South Natomas Library,

2901 Truxel Road, Sacramento,

California, and June 7, 2006 (4 to 7

p.m.), at the Pleasant Grove School,

3075 Howsley Road, Pleasant Grove,

PO 00000

Frm 00042

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

California. Written comments regarding

the scoping process should be addressed

to Ms. Loreen McMahon, Project

Manager, Western Area Power

Administration, 114 Parkshore Drive,

Folsom, CA 95630–4710; toll-free

telephone (866) 859–5126; fax (916)

985–1935, or e-mail svs-seis@wapa.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.

Loreen McMahon, Project Manager,

Western Area Power Administration,

telephone (866) 859–5126; fax (916)

985–1935, or e-mail svs-seis@wapa.gov.

For general information on DOE’s NEPA

review procedures or status of a NEPA

review, contact Ms. Carol M. Borgstrom,

Director of NEPA Policy and

Compliance, EH–42, U.S. Department of

Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue

SW., Washington, DC 20585, telephone

(202) 586–4600 or (800) 472–2756.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Western is

a power marketing agency of DOE that

markets Federal electric power to

statutorily defined customers, including

project use, municipalities, irrigation

districts, and Native American tribes.

Western prepared a Draft EIS on the

SVS in November 2002 and a final EIS

in September 2003. The ROD was

signed on January 12, 2004, for the

proposed project (69 FR 1721). The EIS

and ROD are available upon request by

contacting Ms. McMahon as described

above. The ROD can also be found on

the World Wide Web at http://

www.wapa.gov/fedreg/fedreg04.htm.

The previous EIS analyzed

environmental impacts of alternatives to

E:\FR\FM\09MYN1.SGM

09MYN1

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.