Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 15, 2006 / Notices
Agency decision
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 15, 2006 / Notices
and how to participate in the FERC’s
proceedings.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. PF06–35–000]
Columbia Gas Transmission
Corporation; Notice of Intent To
Prepare an Environmental Assessment
for the Proposed Eastern Market
Expansion Project and Request for
Comments on Environmental Issues
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1
November 7, 2006.
The staff of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) will prepare an
environmental assessment (EA) that will
discuss the environmental impacts of
Columbia Gas Transmission
Corporation’s (Columbia) planned
Eastern Market Expansion Project
located in certain counties in West
Virginia, Virginia, and Ohio.
This notice announces the opening of
the scoping process we will use to
gather input from the public and
interested agencies on the project. Your
input will help the Commission staff
determine which issues need to be
evaluated in the EA. Please note that the
scoping period will close on December
11, 2006.
This notice is being sent to affected
landowners; federal, state, and local
government representatives and
agencies; environmental and public
interest groups; Native American tribes;
other interested parties in this
proceeding; and local libraries and
newspapers. We encourage government
representatives to notify their
constituents of this planned project and
encourage them to comment on their
areas of concern.
If you are a landowner receiving this
notice, you may be contacted by a
Columbia representative about the
acquisition of an easement to construct,
operate, and maintain the proposed
facilities. Columbia would seek to
negotiate a mutually acceptable
agreement. However, if the project is
approved by the Commission, that
approval conveys with it the right of
eminent domain. Therefore, if easement
negotiations fail to produce an
agreement, Columbia could initiate
condemnation proceedings in
accordance with state law.
A fact sheet prepared by the FERC
entitled ‘‘An Interstate Natural Gas
Facility on My Land? What Do I Need
to Know?’’ is available for viewing on
the FERC Internet website (http://
www.ferc.gov). This fact sheet addresses
a number of typically asked questions,
including the use of eminent domain
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:00 Nov 14, 2006
Jkt 211001
Summary of the Proposed Project
The planned Eastern Market
Expansion Project consists of:
(a) Expanding the existing Crawford
Storage Field in Fairfield and Hocking
Counties, Ohio;
(b) Expanding the existing Coco
Storage Field in Kanawha County, West
Virginia;
(c) Installing an additional 12,600
horsepower at four existing compressor
stations in West Virginia; and
(d) Constructing three sections of 26to 36-inch-diameter pipeline loop
totaling about 15.5 miles in Clay and
Randolph Counties, West Virginia and
Warren, Clarke, and Fauquier Counties,
Virginia.
A general overview map of the major
project facilities is provided in
Appendix 1.1
Columbia indicates that these
facilities would provide an additional
97,050 dekatherms per day of storage
deliverability and associated firm
pipeline transportation capacity to four
local gas distribution companies in the
Mid-Atlantic region.
Columbia anticipates filing an
application with the FERC in March
2007. If approved, Columbia would seek
approval to begin construction by April
1, 2008, with a proposed in-service date
of April 1, 2009.
Land Requirements
Construction of the project facilities
would disturb about 327 acres of land.
Following construction, about 272 acres
of the total would be retained for the
operation of the pipeline and the
aboveground facilities. Columbia
currently plans to use a nominal rightof-way (ROW) width of 75 feet to
construct its pipelines, with occasional
increases in width for additional
workspace at waterbody, wetland, road,
and railroad crossings. For operation of
the pipeline facilities, Columbia plans
to use a 70-foot-wide permanent ROW.
Temporary extra workspaces may also
be required in areas with site-specific
constraints, such as side-slope
construction and areas needed for pipe
storage and equipment yards. The well
connect lines at the Coco and Crawford
Storage Fields would require a ROW
width of 50 feet for construction, with
1 The appendices referenced in this notice are not
being printed in the Federal Register. Copies are
available on the Commission’s Web site (excluding
maps) at the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link or from the
Commission’s Public Reference Room or call (202)
502–8371. For instructions on connecting to
eLibrary refer to the end of this notice. Copies of
the appendices were sent to all those receiving this
notice in the mail.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66513
the same width maintained as
permanent ROW for operation. For new
well installation at the Coco and
Crawford Storage Fields, a 400-foot-by400-foot work area would be utilized
while for reconditioned wells a 300foot-by-300-foot work area would be
used. After installation, a 300-footradius buffer would be associated with
each well.
Currently Identified Environmental
Issues
We have already identified several
issues that we think deserve attention
based on a preliminary review of the
proposed facilities and information
provided by Columbia. This list of
issues may be changed based on your
comments and our analysis:
• Impacts on residential areas;
• The effect of blasting on
groundwater;
• Potential noise impacts associated
with construction and operation;
• Difficult ROW restoration in areas
of side-slope construction; and
• Impact on visual resources due to
vegetation clearing to create a new
ROW.
The EA Process
The FERC will be the lead federal
agency for the preparation of the EA.
The document will satisfy the
requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The
Eastern Market Expansion Project is in
the preliminary design state.
For this project, the FERC staff has
initiated its NEPA review prior to
receiving the application. The purpose
of the Commission’s Pre-Filing Process
is to involve interested stakeholders
early in project planning and to identify
and resolve issues before an application
is filed with the FERC. A docket number
(PF06–35–000) has been established to
place information filed by Columbia,
and related documents issued by the
Commission, into the public record.
Once a formal application is filed with
the FERC, a new docket number will be
established.
NEPA requires the Commission to
take into account the environmental
impacts that could result from an action
whenever it considers the issuance of a
Certificate of Public Convenience and
Necessity. NEPA also requires us to
discover and address concerns the
public may have about proposals. This
process is referred to as ‘‘scoping.’’ The
main goal of the scoping process is to
focus the analysis in the EA on the
important environmental issues. By this
Notice of Intent, we are requesting
public comments on the scope of the
issues that should be addressed in the
E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM
15NON1
66514
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 220 / Wednesday, November 15, 2006 / Notices
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES1
EA. We will consider all comments
received during scoping in the
preparation of the EA.
Staff’s independent analysis and
evaluation of the issues will be included
in the EA. The EA will also include
possible alternatives to the proposed
project or portions of the project, and
will make recommendations on how to
lessen or avoid impacts on the various
resource areas of concern. Depending on
the comments received during the
scoping process, the EA may be
published and mailed to federal, state,
and local agencies; elected officials;
environmental and public interest
groups; other interested parties; affected
landowners; Native American tribes;
libraries, and newspapers; and the
Commission’s official service list for
this proceeding. A 30-day comment
period will be allotted for review of the
EA, if it is published.
FERC staff will be involved in
discussions with other jurisdictional
agencies to identify their issues and
concerns. These agencies include the
National Park Service; U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (West Virginia,
Virginia, and Ohio Field Offices); U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (Huntington,
Pittsburgh, and Norfolk Districts); West
Virginia Department of Environmental
Protection; West Virginia Department of
Natural Resources; West Virginia State
Historic Preservation Office (SHPO);
Virginia Marine Resource Commission;
Virginia Department of Conservation
and Recreation; Virginia Department of
Environmental Quality; Virginia Game
and Inland Fisheries; Virginia SHPO;
Ohio Environmental Protection Agency;
Ohio Department of Natural Resources;
and Ohio SHPO. By this notice, we are
asking these and other federal, state, and
local agencies with jurisdiction and/or
special expertise with respect to
environmental issues to formally enter
cooperating agency status with us in the
preparation of the EA. Agencies that
would like to request cooperating status
should follow the instructions for filing
comments provided below.
Public Participation
You can make a difference by
providing us with your specific
comments or concerns about the
proposal. Your comments should focus
on the potential environmental effects,
reasonable alternatives, and measures to
avoid or lessen environmental impact.
The more specific your comments, the
more useful they will be. Please
carefully follow these instructions to
ensure that your comments are received
in time and properly recorded:
• Send an original and two copies of
your letter to: Magalie R. Salas,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:00 Nov 14, 2006
Jkt 211001
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First St., NE., Room
1A, Washington, DC 20426;
• Label one copy of the comments for
the attention of Gas Branch 1, DG2E;
• Reference Docket No. PF06–35–000
on the original and both copies; and
• Mail your comments so that they
will be received in Washington, DC on
or before December 11, 2006.
Please note that the Commission
encourages electronic filing of
comments. See 18 Code of Federal
Regulations 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the
instructions on the Commission’s
Internet website at http://www.ferc.gov
under the ‘‘eFiling’’ link and the link to
the User’s Guide. Before you can file
comments you will need to create an
account by clicking on ‘‘Login to File’’
and then ‘‘New User Account.’’ You will
be asked to select the type of filing you
are making. This filing is considered a
‘‘Comment on Filing’’.
When Columbia submits its
application for authorization to
construct and operate the Eastern
Market Expansion Project, the
Commission will publish a Notice of
Application in the Federal Register and
will establish a deadline for interested
persons to intervene in the proceeding.
Because the Commission’s Pre-Filing
Process occurs before an application to
begin a proceeding is officially filed,
petitions to intervene during this
process are premature and will not be
accepted by the Commission.
Environmental Mailing List
The determination of whether to
distribute the EA for public comment
will be based on the response to this
notice. If the EA is published and you
are interested in receiving it, please
return the Information Request
(Appendix 2).
Availability of Additional Information
Additional information about the
project is available from the
Commission’s Office of External Affairs
at 1–866–208 FERC (3372) or on the
FERC Internet Web site (http://
www.ferc.gov). Using the ‘‘eLibrary’’
link, select ‘‘General Search’’ from the
eLibrary menu, enter the selected date
range and a docket number field (i.e.,
PF06–35–000), and follow the
instructions. Searches may also be done
using the phrase ‘‘Eastern Market
Expansion Project’’ in the Text Search
field. For assistance with access to
eLibrary, the helpline can be reached at
1–866–208–3676, TTY (202) 502–8659,
or at FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov. The
eLibrary link on the FERC Internet Web
site also provides access to the texts of
formal documents issued by the
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Commission, such as orders, notices,
and rule makings.
In addition, the FERC now offers a
free service called eSubscription that
allows you to keep track of all formal
issuances and submittals in specific
dockets. This can reduce the amount of
time you spend researching proceedings
by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document
summaries, and direct links to the
documents. To register for this service,
go to the eSubscription link in the FERC
Internet Web site.
Public meetings or site visits will be
posted on the Commission’s calendar
located at http://www.ferc.gov/
EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx along
with other related information.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–19219 Filed 11–14–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Project No. 12447–001]
Fort Dodge Hydroelectric Development
Company; Notice of Application Ready
for Environmental Analysis and
Soliciting Comments,
Recommendations, Terms and
Conditions, and Prescriptions
November 7, 2006.
Take notice that the following
hydroelectric license application has
been filed with the Commission and is
available for public inspection.
a. Type of Application: Original
Minor License.
b. Project No.: P–12447–001.
c. Date Filed: March 21, 2006.
d. Applicant: Fort Dodge
Hydroelectric Development Company.
e. Name of Project: Fort Dodge Mill
Dam Hydroelectric Project.
f. Location: Located on the Des
Moines River in Webster County, Iowa.
This project would not occupy Federal
lands.
g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power
Act 16 U.S.C. 791(a)–825(r).
h. Applicant Contact: Thomas J.
Wilkinson, Jr., Fort Dodge Hydroelectric
Development Company, 1800 1st Ave.
NE., Ste. 200, Cedar Rapids, IA 52402;
(319) 364–0171.
i. FERC Contact: Patrick Murphy,
(202) 502–8755,
patrick.murphy@ferc.gov.
j. Deadline for filing comments,
recommendations, terms and
conditions, and prescriptions: 60 days
E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM
15NON1
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.