Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 101 / Thursday, May 25, 2006 / Notices

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 101 / Thursday, May 25, 2006 / Notices

service, go to the eSubscription link on

the FERC Internet Web site.

Magalie R. Salas,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E6–8019 Filed 5–24–06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Project No. 1390–040–CA]

Southern California Edison Company;

Notice of Availability of Environmental

Assessment

May 19, 2006.

In accordance with the National

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and

the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission’s Regulations, 18 CFR Part

380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47879), the

Office of Energy Projects has reviewed

the Offer of Settlement (Settlement)

filed on February 4, 2005, including

proposed amended license conditions

for the Lundy Hydroelectric Project,

located on Mill Creek in Mono County,

near the town of Lee Vining and has

prepared an Environmental Assessment

(EA) for the proposed amendment.

The EA contains our analysis of the

potential effects of the existing project

and concludes that amending the

project license in accordance with the

Settlement as modified by staff would

not constitute a major federal action

significantly affecting the quality of the

human environment.

A copy of the EA is on file with the

Commission and is available for public

inspection at the Commission in the

Public Reference Room. The EA may

also be viewed on the Commission’s

Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using

the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link. Enter the docket

number excluding the last three digits in

the docket number field to access the

document. For assistance, contact FERC

Online Support at

FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or tollfree at 1–866–208–3676, or for TTY,

(202) 502–8659.

Any comments should be filed within

30 days from the issuance date of this

notice, and should be addressed to the

Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,

Room 1–A, Washington, DC 20426.

Please affix ‘‘Lundy Hydroelectric

Project No. 1390’’ to all comments.

Comments may be filed electronically

via Internet in lieu of paper. The

Commission strongly encourages

electronic filings. See 18 CFR

385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions

on the Commission’s Web site under the

‘‘eFiling’’ link. For further information,

contact John Smith at (202) 502–8972 or

by e-mail at john.smith@ferc.gov.

Magalie R. Salas,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E6–8025 Filed 5–24–06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. PF06–21–000]

Guardian Pipeline, L.L.C.; Notice of

Intent To Prepare an Environmental

Impact Statement for the Proposed

Guardian Expansion/Extension

Project, Request for Comments on

Environmental Issues, and Notice of

Public Scoping Meetings

May 19, 2006.

The staff of the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission (FERC or

Commission) will prepare an

environmental impact statement (EIS)

that will address the environmental

impacts of the Guardian Expansion/

Extension Project (G–II) proposed by

Guardian Pipeline L.L.C (Guardian). The

Commission will use the EIS in its

decision-making process to determine

whether or not to authorize the project.

This notice explains the scoping process

the Commission will use to gather input

from the public and interested agencies

on the project. Your input will help us

determine the issues that need to be

evaluated in the EIS. Please note that

the scoping period will close on June

23, 2006.

Comments may be submitted in

written form or verbally. Further details

on how to submit written comments are

provided in the Public Participation

section of this notice. In lieu of sending

written comments, we invite you to

attend the public scoping meetings we

have scheduled as follows:

Date and time

Location

Monday, June 12, 2006 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. (CDT) ....................................

Radisson Hotel and Conference Center of Green Bay 2040 Airport

Drive Green Bay, WI US (920) 405–6404.

Ramada Plaza Hotel 1 North Main Street Fond Du Lac, WI 54935

(920) 923–3000.

Olympia Conference Center 1350 Royale Mile Road Oconomowoc, WI

53066 (262) 369–4969.

Tuesday, June 13, 2006 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. (CDT) ...................................

Wednesday, June 14, 2006 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. (CDT) .............................

cchase on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES

30131

This notice is being sent to affected

landowners; Federal, state, and local

government agencies; elected officials;

environmental and public interest

groups; Native American tribes; other

interested parties; and local libraries

and newspapers. We encourage

government representatives to notify

their constituents of this planned

project and encourage them to comment

on their areas of concern.

If you are a landowner receiving this

notice, you may be contacted by a

Guardian representative about the

acquisition of an easement to construct,

operate, and maintain the proposed

VerDate Aug<31>2005

16:42 May 24, 2006

Jkt 208001

project facilities. The pipeline company

would seek to negotiate a mutually

acceptable agreement. However, if the

project is approved by the FERC, that

approval conveys with it the right of

eminent domain. Therefore, if easement

negotiations fail to produce an

agreement, the pipeline company could

initiate condemnation proceedings in

accordance with state law.

A fact sheet prepared by the FERC

entitled ‘‘An Interstate Natural Gas

Facility on My Land? What Do I Need

To Know?’’ is available for viewing on

the FERC Internet Web site (http://

www.ferc.gov). This fact sheet addresses

PO 00000

Frm 00019

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

a number of typically asked questions,

including the use of eminent domain

and how to participate in the FERC’s

proceedings.

Summary of the Proposed Project

Guardian proposes to construct, own,

operate, and maintain:

• Approximately 105.8 miles of new

natural gas pipeline; about 79.2 miles of

which consist of 30-inch-diameter

pipeline, and the remaining 26.6 miles

would consist of 20-inch-diameter

pipeline. The proposed pipeline would

originate at Ixonia in northeastern

Jefferson County, Wisconsin and travel

E:\FR\FM\25MYN1.SGM

25MYN1

30132

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 101 / Thursday, May 25, 2006 / Notices

in a general north-northeast direction

through Dodge, Fond du Lac, Calumet,

Brown, and Outagamie Counties,

Wisconsin, terminating at a point just

west of Green Bay. The six proposed

meter stations would be located along

the proposed expansion route in

Jefferson, Dodge, Fond du Lac, Calumet,

Brown, and Outagamie Counties,

Wisconsin.

• One new 39,000-horsepower (hp)

compressor station near Sycamore

Illinois; the proposed compressor

station would be located along the

existing Guardian pipeline route in De

Kalb County, Illinois.

• One new 39,000-hp compressor

station in Walworth, Wisconsin. The

proposed compressor station would be

located along the proposed G-II pipeline

route in Walworth County, Wisconsin.

• Six new meter stations, and

associated pipeline facilities including

pig launcher/receivers and five mainline

valves.

Guardian states that the project would

provide about 537,200 decatherms per

day of additional natural gas capacity to

Guardian’s existing pipeline system.

Guardian indicates that the proposed

additional capacity would facilitate the

transport of natural gas to customers

within the state of Wisconsin and

provide those customers with the

necessary infrastructure to support

growth, choice, and competition within

the natural gas marketplace. Guardian

proposes to have the project constructed

and operational by November 2008.

The general location of the proposed

pipeline and associated facilities are

shown in the figure included as

Appendix 1.1

Nonjurisdictional Facilities

In addition to the facilities proposed

by Guardian, the proposed project has

associated facilities that do not come

under the jurisdiction of the

Commission. These related

‘‘nonjurisdictional’’ facilities include:

• The Wisconsin Public Service

Corporation (WPSC) proposes to

construct three lateral pipelines to

interconnect with the G-II pipeline

expansion segment and conduct

modifications to WPSC’s existing West

cchase on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES

1 The appendices referenced in this notice are not

being printed in the Federal Register. Copies of all

appendices, other than Appendix 1 (maps), are

available on the Commission’s Web site at the

‘‘eLibrary’’ link or from the Commission’s Public

Reference Room, 888 First Street, NE., Washington,

DC 20426, or call (202) 502–8371. For instructions

on connecting to eLibrary refer to the Public

Participation section of this notice. Copies of the

appendices were sent to all those receiving this

notice in the mail. Requests for detailed maps of the

proposed facilities should be made directly to

Guardian.

VerDate Aug<31>2005

16:42 May 24, 2006

Jkt 208001

Green Bay Line including a tie-in to an

existing WPSC 12-inch feeder pipeline

and the addition of flow controls. The

three proposed laterals include the

following:

—Sheboygan/Plymouth Lateral—

consisting of approximately 32 miles

of 16- and 12-inch-diameter pipeline.

—Chilton Lateral—consisting of

approximately 1 mile of 4-inchdiameter pipeline.

—Denmark Lateral—consisting of

approximately 14 miles of 12-inchdiameter pipeline.

• We-Energies proposes to construct

two lateral pipelines to interconnect

with the G-II pipeline expansion

segment. The proposed laterals include

the following:

—Hartford/West Bend Lateral—

consisting of approximately 12.7

miles of 8-inch-diameter pipeline.

—Fox Valley Lateral—consisting of

approximately 12.6 total miles of

20-, 16-, 12-, and 8-inch-diameter

pipeline.

• Commonwealth Editions Power

Company (ComEd) proposes to

construct approximately 2.4 miles of

transmission line to bring power from

an existing 138-kilovolt (kV) ComEd

transmission line to Guardian’s

proposed Sycamore Compressor Station

in De Kalb, Illinois.

• We-Energies proposes to construct

up to 2 miles of transmission line to

bring power from an existing 138-kV

We-Energies transmission line to

Guardian’s proposed Bluff Creek

Compressor Station in Walworth,

Wisconsin.

The WPSC and We-Energies laterals

and electric transmission line facilities

and the ComEd electric transmission

line facility will be under the

jurisdiction of the Wisconsin Public

Service Commission (WIPSC) and the

Illinois Commerce Commission,

respectively.We 2 have determined that

these nonjurisdictional facilities will be

discussed in the EIS. At this time, the

WIPSC and the Wisconsin Department

of Natural Resources have agreed to

participate as participating agencies in

the EIS process.

Land Requirements for Construction

As proposed, the typical construction

right-of-way for the project pipeline

would be between 80 to 110 feet wide.

An 80-foot right-of-way is proposed for

the 26.6 miles of 20-inch pipe and a

110-foot right-of-way is proposed for the

79.2 miles of 30-inch pipe. Following

2 ‘‘We,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to the

environmental staff of the FERC’s Office of Energy

Projects.

PO 00000

Frm 00020

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

construction, Guardian would retain a

50-foot-wide permanent right-of-way for

operation of the project. Additional,

temporary extra workspaces beyond the

typical construction right-of-way limits

would be required at certain feature

crossings (e.g., roads, railroads,

wetlands, or waterbodies), in areas with

steep side slopes, or in association with

special construction techniques.

Based on preliminary information,

construction of the proposed project

facilities would affect a total of about

1336.9 acres of land (including

construction right-of-ways and

aboveground facilities). This does not

include land that would be disturbed by

temporary work spaces and lay down

areas, which is still being determined.

Following construction, about 641.2

acres would be maintained as

permanent right-of-way, and about 23

acres of land would be maintained as

new aboveground facility sites. The

remaining 672.7 acres of temporary

construction rights-of-way and any

other additional areas required for extra

workspaces, pipe storage or contractor

yards would be restored and allowed to

revert to its former use.

The EIS Process

The National Environmental Policy

Act (NEPA) requires the Commission to

take into account the environmental

impacts that could result from an action

when it considers whether or not an

interstate natural gas pipeline should be

approved. The FERC will use the EIS to

consider the environmental impact that

could result if Guardian’s G–II Project is

authorized under section 7 of the

Natural Gas Act. NEPA also requires us

to discover and address concerns the

public may have about proposals to be

considered by the Commission. This

process is referred to as ‘‘scoping.’’ The

main goal of the scoping process is to

focus the analysis in the EIS on the

important environmental issues. With

this Notice of Intent, the Commission

staff is requesting public comments on

the scope of the issues to be addressed

in the EIS. All comments received will

be considered during preparation of the

EIS.

Our independent analysis of the

issues will be included in a draft EIS.

We will also evaluate possible

alternatives to the proposed project or

portions of the project, and make

recommendations on how to lessen or

avoid impacts on affected resources.

The draft EIS will be mailed to

Federal, state, and local government

agencies; elected officials;

environmental and public interest

groups; Native American tribes; affected

landowners; commentors; other

E:\FR\FM\25MYN1.SGM

25MYN1

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 101 / Thursday, May 25, 2006 / Notices

cchase on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES

interested parties; local libraries and

newspapers; and the FERC’s official

service list for this proceeding. A 45-day

comment period will be allotted for

review of the draft EIS. We will consider

all comments on the draft EIS and revise

the document, as necessary, before

issuing a final EIS. We will consider all

comments on the final EIS before we

make our recommendations to the

Commission. To ensure that your

comments are considered, please follow

the instructions in the Public

Participation section of this notice.

Although no formal application has

been filed, the FERC staff has already

initiated its NEPA review under its Prefiling Process. The purpose of the Prefiling Process is to encourage the early

involvement of interested stakeholders

and to identify and resolve issues before

an application is filed with the FERC.

With this notice, we are asking

Federal, state, and local governmental

agencies with jurisdiction and/or

special expertise with respect to

environmental issues, to express their

interest in becoming cooperating

agencies for the preparation of the EIS.

These agencies may choose to

participate once they have evaluated the

proposal relative to their

responsibilities. Agencies that would

like to request cooperating status should

follow the instructions for filing

comments provided below (see Public

Participation).

Currently Identified Environmental

Issues

The EIS will discuss impacts that

could occur as a result of the

construction and operation of the

proposed project. We have already

identified several issues that we think

deserve attention based on a

preliminary review of the project site

and the facility information provided by

Guardian. This preliminary list of issues

may be changed based on your

comments and our analysis.

• Potential effects on prime farmland

soils and soils with a high potential for

compaction.

• Potential effects on waterbodies

designated under federal and/or state

programs.

• Evaluation of temporary and

permanent impacts on wetlands and

development of appropriate mitigation.

• Native American and tribal

concerns, including crossing of the

Oneida Nation Indian Reservation.

• Potential impacts to fish and

wildlife habitat, including waterbird

nesting areas along major river

crossings.

• Potential effect on federally and

state-listed species.

VerDate Aug<31>2005

16:42 May 24, 2006

Jkt 208001

• Potential impacts to existing land

uses, including agricultural, certified

organic farms, and managed forested

lands.

• Potential visual effects of the

aboveground facilities on surrounding

areas.

• Potential impacts and potential

benefits of construction workforce on

local housing, infrastructure, public

services, and economy.

• Potential impacts to local air and

noise quality associated with

construction and operation.

• Alternative alignments for the

pipeline route and alternative sites for

the compressor stations.

Public Participation

You can make a difference by

providing us with your specific

comments or concerns about the

proposed project. By becoming a

commentor, your concerns will be

addressed in the EIS and considered by

the Commission. Your comments

should focus on the potential

environmental effects, reasonable

alternatives (including alternative

facility sites and pipeline routes), and

measures to avoid or lessen

environmental impact. The more

specific your comments, the more useful

they will be. To ensure that your

comments are timely and properly

recorded, please carefully follow these

instructions:

• Send an original and two copies of

your letter to: Magalie R. Salas,

Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, 888 First St., NE., Room

1A, Washington, DC 20426.

• Label one copy of your comments

for the attention of Gas Branch 1.

• Reference Docket No. PF06–21–000

on the original and both copies.

• Mail your comments so that they

will be received in Washington, DC on

or before June 23, 2006.

The Commission strongly encourages

electronic filing of any comments in

response to this Notice of Intent. For

information on electronically filing

comments, please see the instructions

on the Commission’s Web site at

http://www.ferc.gov under the ‘‘eFiling’’ link and the link to the User’s

Guide, as well as information in 18 CFR

385.2001(a)(1)(iii). Before you can

submit comments you will need to

create a free account, which can be

created on-line.

The public scoping meetings (dates,

times, and locations are listed above) are

designed to provide another opportunity

to offer comments on the proposed

project. Interested groups and

individuals are encouraged to attend the

meetings and to present comments on

PO 00000

Frm 00021

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

30133

the environmental issues they believe

should be addressed in the EIS. A

transcript of each meeting will be

generated so that your comments will be

accurately recorded.

Once Guardian formally files its

application with the Commission, you

may want to become an official party to

the proceeding known as an

‘‘intervenor.’’ Intervenors play a more

formal role in the process and are able

to file briefs, appear at hearings, and be

heard by the courts if they choose to

appeal the Commission’s final ruling.

An intervenor formally participates in a

Commission proceeding by filing a

request to intervene. Instructions for

becoming an intervenor are included in

the User’s Guide under the ‘‘e-filing’’

link on the Commission’s Web site.

Please note that you may not request

intervenor status at this time. You must

wait until a formal application is filed

with the Commission.

Environmental Mailing List

An effort is being made to send this

notice to all individuals, organizations,

and government entities interested in

and/or potentially affected by the

proposed project. This includes all

landowners who are potential right-ofway grantors, whose property may be

used temporarily for project purposes,

or who own homes within distances

defined in the Commission’s regulations

of certain aboveground facilities.

If you received this notice, you are on

the environmental mailing list for this

project. If you do not want to send

comments at this time, but still want to

remain on our mailing list, please return

the Information Request (Appendix 2). If

you do not return the Information

Request, you will be removed from the

Commission’s environmental mailing

list.

Availability of Additional Information

Additional information about the

project is available from the

Commission’s Office of External Affairs,

at 1–866–208–FERC (3372) or on the

FERC Internet Web site (http://

www.ferc.gov) using the ‘‘eLibrary link.’’

Click on the eLibrary link, select

‘‘General Search’’ and enter the project

docket number excluding the last three

digits (i.e., PF06–21) in the ‘‘Docket

Number’’ field. Be sure you have

selected an appropriate date range. For

assistance, please contact FERC Online

Support at

FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll

free at 1–866–208–3676, or TTY, contact

(202) 502–8659. The eLibrary link on

the FERC Internet Web site also

provides access to the texts of formal

documents issued by the Commission,

E:\FR\FM\25MYN1.SGM

25MYN1

30134

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 101 / Thursday, May 25, 2006 / Notices

such as orders, notices, and rule

makings.

In addition, the FERC now offers a

free service called eSubscription that

allows you to keep track of all formal

issuances and submittals in specific

dockets. This can reduce the amount of

time you spend researching proceedings

by automatically providing you with

notification of these filings, document

summaries, and direct links to the

documents. To register for this service,

go to http://www.ferc.gov/

esubscribenow.htm.

Public meetings or site visits will be

posted on the Commission’s calendar

located at http://www.ferc.gov/

EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx along

with other related information.

Finally, Guardian has established an

Internet website for this project at

http://www.guardianpipeline.com/. The

Web site includes a description of the

project, a map of the proposed pipeline

route, and answers to frequently asked

questions. You can also request

additional information or provide

comments directly to Guardian at 1–

866–608–7300 or

mjames@landservicecompany.com.

Magalie R. Salas,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E6–8028 Filed 5–24–06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. CP06–102–000]

Trunkline LNG Company, LLC; Notice

of Intent To Prepare an Environmental

Assessment for the Proposed

Infrastructure Enhancement Project

and Request for Comments on

Environmental Issues

cchase on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES

May 19, 2006.

The staff of the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission (FERC or

Commission) will prepare an

environmental assessment (EA) that will

discuss the environmental impacts of

the Infrastructure Enhancement Project

(IEP) involving construction and

operation of facilities by Trunkline LNG

Company, LLC’s (Trunkline LNG) in

Lake Charles, Calcasieu Parish,

Louisiana.1 Trunkline LNG would

construct and operate Ambient Air

Vaporization (AAV) facilities at its

existing liquefied natural gas import

terminal in Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana.

1 Trunkline LNGs application was filed with the

Commission under section 7 of the Natural Gas Act

and Part 157 of the Commission’s regulations.

VerDate Aug<31>2005

16:42 May 24, 2006

Jkt 208001

These facilities would consist of system

that uses ambient heat in the air to

reduce the use of fuel gas in the

vaporization of liquefied natural gas

(LNG). Additionally, Trunkline LNG

would add natural gas liquids (NGL)

processing facilities for LNG

conditioning and British thermal unit

(Btu) control. This EA will be used by

the Commission in its decision-making

process to determine whether the

project is in the public convenience and

necessity.

If you are a landowner receiving this

notice, you may be contacted by a

pipeline company representative about

the acquisition of an easement to

construct, operate, and maintain the

proposed facilities. The pipeline

company would seek to negotiate a

mutually acceptable agreement.

However, if the project is approved by

the Commission, that approval conveys

with it the right of eminent domain.

Therefore, if easement negotiations fail

to produce an agreement, the pipeline

company could initiate condemnation

proceedings in accordance with state

law.

A fact sheet prepared by the FERC

entitled ‘‘An Interstate Natural Gas

Facility On My Land? What Do I Need

To Know?’’ was attached to the project

notice Trunkline LNG provided to

landowners. This fact sheet addresses a

number of typically asked questions,

including the use of eminent domain

and how to participate in the

Commission’s proceedings. It is

available for viewing on the FERC

Internet Web site (http://www.ferc.gov).

Summary of the Proposed Project

Trunkline LNG’s IEP would provide

alternative vaporization using a

supplemental heat source to reduce the

fuel gas requirements for vaporization.

Reducing the amount of fuel gas

consumed for the vaporization process

allows more of the natural gas from the

LNG to be delivered to customers.

Trunkline LNG seeks authority to

construct and operate the following:

• 64 Potassium Formate (KF)-Air

heaters (64 forced convection, three-fan

air exchangers, 17.9 million Btu per

hour (MMBtu/hr)/Air Heater;

• Four KF–LNG Vaporizers (525

million standard cubic feet per day

[MMscf/d]);

• One NGL Recovery Unit, sized for

a maximum capacity of 1,050 MMscf/d;

• 1,160 feet of 12-inch-diameter

ethane product piping;

• 1,160 feet of 12-inch-diameter

propane product piping;

• Two propylene glycol heaters (150

MMBtu/hr each);

PO 00000

Frm 00022

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

• Glycol storage and circulation

System;

• Two electrical switchgear buildings;

• One remote instrumentation

building, designed as Equipment Room

2; and

• Foam Building No. 4.

The nonjurisdictional facilities

include the expansion of the existing

electric substation, a meter station, and

the construction of two 18 mile-long

(each) take away NGL product

pipelines. British Gas (BG) has

contracted PetoLogistics, LLC to design,

permit, and operate the meter station

and take away pipelines. The pipelines

would consist of a 10-inch-diameter

ethane (approximately 1,800 gallons per

minute [gpm]) pipeline and a 6-inchdiameter propane (approximately 1,250

gpm) pipeline. The pipelines would be

constructed from the meter station to

PetroLogistics’ storage facility in Sulfur,

Louisiana.

The location of the project facilities is

shown in Appendix 1.2

Land Requirements for Construction

Construction of the proposed facilities

would require about 33.1 acres of land

of which 20 acres are currently covered

with grass. Following construction,

about 13.6 acres of the 20 acres would

be returned to grass and 6.4 acres would

be covered with asphalt, concrete or

gravel. Included in the 33.1 acres is

approximately 0.6 acre of land that

would be temporarily affected by the

construction of the NGL product

pipeline and nonjurisdictional meter

station.

In addition, a nonjurisdictional 0.5

acre electric-power substation

expansion site developed and operated

by Entergy would remain gravel covered

with concrete equipment foundations

for the new electrical equipment.

Further, the 18-mile-long

nonjurisdictional take away NGL

products pipelines would require about

130.9 acres of land during construction

and 87.3 acres as permanent right-ofway based on a 60-foot-wide

construction right-of-way and a 40-footwide permanent right-of-way.

The EA Process

The National Environmental Policy

Act (NEPA) requires the Commission to

take into account the environmental

2 The appendices referenced in this notice are not

being printed in the Federal Register. Copies of all

appendices, other than Appendix 1 (maps), are

available on the Commission’s Web site at the

‘‘eLibrary’’ link or from the Commission’s Public

Reference Room, 888 First Street, NE., Washington,

DC 20426, or call (202) 502–8371. For instructions

on connecting to eLibrary refer to the last page of

this notice. Copies of the appendices were sent to

all those receiving this notice in the mail.

E:\FR\FM\25MYN1.SGM

25MYN1