In the Matter of RICHARD W. BRIGGS
Agency decision
Ask Donna
What actually matters in this document.
Text
October 24, 2019
CBCA 6562-TRAV
In the Matter of RICHARD W. BRIGGS
Richard W. Briggs, Columbia, MD, Claimant.
Charity N. King, Office of General Counsel, National Security Agency, Fort Meade,
MD, appearing for Department of Defense.
KULLBERG, Board Judge.
Claimant, Richard W. Briggs, seeks payment in the amount of $422.64 for the cost
of his flight from London to Baltimore. The National Security Agency (NSA) contends that
Mr. Briggs’ return overseas flight on British Airways did not comply with the Fly America
Act, 49 U.S.C. § 40118 (2012). For the reasons stated below, the Board denies the claim.
Background
NSA deployed Mr. Briggs overseas during the period from February 20, 2019, to
August 18, 2019. The itinerary for Mr. Briggs’ return flight from overseas, which was
arranged by a government travel agency, included a connecting flight from London to
Baltimore. Mr. Briggs took leave before returning to the United States and cancelled his
flight from London to Baltimore. He then purchased a ticket for a later return flight on
British Airways. NSA denied reimbursement for his return flight on British Airways because
he had not purchased a flight on a U.S.-flag carrier as required under the Fly America
Act. Mr. Briggs then submitted his claim to the Board.
CBCA 6562-TRAV
2
Discussion
The Fly America Act restricts a government employee’s use of air travel between a
place within the United States and a place outside the United States to air carriers certified
under section 41102 of title 49, United States Code. 49 U.S.C § 40118(a). Under the
Federal Travel Regulation (FTR), which applies to Mr. Briggs, a certified air carrier under
section 41102 is a U.S.-flag air carrier. 41 CFR 301-10.133 (2018) (FTR 301-10.133). In
addition to certified air carriers, a “U.S. flag air carrier service also includes service provided
under a code share agreement with a foreign air carrier . . . when the ticket, or documentation
for an electronic ticket, identifies the U.S. flag air carrier’s designator code and flight
number.” Id. 301-10.134. The FTR further provides that a traveler “will not be reimbursed
for any transportation cost for which [he or she] improperly use[s] [a] foreign air carrier
service.” Id. 301-10.143. A traveler can only receive reimbursement for travel on a foreign
air carrier when the traveler’s agency authorizes such travel. Id. The Joint Travel
Regulations (JTR), which also apply to Mr. Briggs, similarly provide that “[t]here is no
transportation reimbursement, for any leg of a trip, when an unauthorized or unapproved nonU.S. flag air carrier service . . . is used.” JTR 020206-I.2.
NSA did not authorize Mr. Briggs’ use of a foreign air carrier. In the absence of such
authorization, Mr. Briggs is not entitled to reimbursement for his return air travel from
London to Baltimore on British Airways. See Makila James, CBCA 5010-TRAV 16-1 BCA
¶ 36,308 at 177,041; Inu K.C., CBCA 4973-TRAV, 15-1 BCA ¶ 36,181, at 176,532.
Although Mr. Briggs contends that he was not properly informed of the restrictions on air
travel under the Fly America Act, neither his lack of knowledge nor lack of correct advice
from agency personnel will excuse his failure to use a U.S.-flag air carrier. See Matthew J.
Klages, CBCA 4942-TRAV, 15-1 BCA ¶ 36,165, at 176,477. In any case, the Board has no
authority to waive the requirements of the Fly America Act. Id.
Decision
The claim is denied.
H. Chuck Kullberg
H. CHUCK KULLBERG
Board Judge
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.