Susan P. Graber
2015Annual
Ask Donna
Pull out the substance of this filing.
What was filed
21
investments
0
positions
0
gifts
1
agreements
0
debts
3
reimbursements
0
income
1
spouse income
Named parties
- Umversity of CA, Irvine School of Law
- Lewis and Clark Law School
- Umversity of New Mexico
- Portland General (retirement mcome)
As filed
Charles Schwab Cash Reserves #1 — Int/Div
Charles Schwab Cash Reserves #2 — Int/Div
Charles Schwab Cash Reserves #3 — Int/Div
Oregon Savings Growth Plan — None
PERS account (see descript. in Part 11 (1) — None
Family Farm LLC - tax assessment dated 32672014 (S207.000) — Distribution
IRA #1 reported in the aggregate(H) — Int/Div
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund
Vanguard 500 Index Fund
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund
Vanguard Total Stock Market Fund
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt ETF — Sold (part)
Fidelity Cash Reserves Money Mkt
IRA # 2 reported in the aggregate(H) — Int/Div
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund
Schwab US Treasury Money Fund — Buy (add'l)
Schwab US Treasury Money Fund — Sold (part)
Vanguard Prime Cap Core Fund
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund (ETF) — Sold (part)
Vanguard Total Stock Market Fund (VISMX)
Vanguard Index 500
Agreement — 1988 — Oregon Public Employee's Retirement Systems (PERS) with former employer when was a state court judge {Statutorily defined benefits, no control)
Reimbursement — Umversity of CA, Irvine School of Law — 22.23.2015 — Irvine CA — Moot Court — travel, lodgimg and food
Reimbursement — Lewis and Clark Law School — 2/27-3/112015 — Cambridge, MA — Moot Court — travel, lodging and food
Reimbursement — Umversity of New Mexico — 63-6/512015 — Albuquerque, NM — Judicial Conclave — travel, lodging, and food
Spouse's income — 2015 — Portland General (retirement mcome)
Part VII, lines 1-3: The Charles Schwab Cash Reserve funds are cash-equivalent funds, Each account is listed separately,
Part VII - IRA accounts, lines 7 and 14. Gains and losses are not reported to us in detail in these accounts,
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.