Gary S. Austin
2011Annual
Ask Donna
Pull out the substance of this filing.
What was filed
16
investments
0
positions
0
gifts
2
agreements
0
debts
0
reimbursements
2
income
1
spouse income
Named parties
- Retirement income from the County of Fresno (the amount in the next column 1s gross annual income)
- Retirement income from the State of California (Judge's Retirement) (the amount in the next column is gross annual income)
- State of California, Admuustrative Office of the Courts
As filed
Custodial Account £1 (Y)
Franklin High Income A (Y)
American Europacific GRW A (Y)
American Inv Co. of AmA (Y)
American GR FD of America A (Y)
MS AAA Calif tax FR Trust (Y)
MorganStanleySmithBamey fund-529A (Y)
Wells Fargo Bank (accounts) — Interest
Bank of the West {account) — Interest
Fresno County Federal CU (accounts) — Int/Div
Educational Employees CU (accounts) — Int
State of Calif 401K & 457 plans-Nationwide (secl) — Int/Div
Golden CU (accounts) — Int/Div
Western Federal CU (accounts) — Int./y
Capital Source Bank (accounts) — Interest
Bank of America (Y)
Agreement — 11977 — County of Fresno Retirement Plan. No control
Agreement — 1986 — State of California Judges Retirement Plan. No control
Income — 2011 — Retirement income from the County of Fresno (the amount in the next column 1s gross annual income) — S43.514.79
Income — 2011 — Retirement income from the State of California (Judge's Retirement) (the amount in the next column is gross annual income) — $95,249.88
Spouse's income — 2011 — State of California, Admuustrative Office of the Courts
In regard to item #12 in Section VII, as reported in last year's Financial Disclosure Report, | liquidated my State of California 401K plan back in 2010, This year,
2012, I discovered that some time ago
, through
employment with the State of California, has both a 401K and 457 retirement plan. Both of these
plans are produced for participants in the State's Savings Plus Program and are administered by a third party sdministrator known as "Nationwide Retirement
Solutions”. Various investment options are offered but only one of them, which
DOES NOT have, is self-directed. All of the other options are NOT
self-directed which means that the participant has no control over the individual stocks, bonds, etc., which are regularly traded mn them. Finally, in one of the
options selected by
, a participant is allowed to choose a level of risk.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.