Melinda Harmon
2014Annual
Ask Donna
Pull out the substance of this filing.
What was filed
37
investments
0
positions
0
gifts
0
agreements
0
debts
0
reimbursements
0
income
1
spouse income
Named parties
- Elm St. Holdings, LLC
- Parmer, Cram, Caton & James Law Firm
As filed
IRA #1 — Int/Div
ExxonMobil
Invesco Amer Franchise A
Morgan Stanley Bank Deposit Program
IRA #2 — Int/Div
Morgan Stanley Bank Deposit Program
Invesco Amer Franchise A
IRA #3 — Int/Div
Triumph Resources
Zweig Total Return Fund Inc
Invesco Amer Franchise A
Alliance Bernstem Large Cap Growth Fund, Class C
Morgan Stanley Bank Deposit Program
LAW FIRM 401 K PROFIT SHARING PLAN — Int./y
REAL ESTATE, DALLAS, DALLAS COUNTY. TX PARCEL — Rent — Sold — Elm St. Holdings, LLC
REAL ESTATE, DALLAS, DALLAS COUNTY. TX PARCEL 2 — Reat
EXTRAORDINARY LIFE POLICY NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL — Int/Div
NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL "65 LIFE" POLICY #1 — Int/Div
NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL "65 LIFE" POLICY 2 — Int/Div
NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL "65 LIFE" POLICY #3 — Int/Div
ABT(X) — None
ABBY (X) common — None
MO (X) common — None
CVX (X) common — Int/Div
KO (X) common — Int/Div
COP — None
XOM (X) common — Int/Div
INJ(X) common — Int/Div
MSFT (X) common — Int/Div
PEP (X) common — None
PM (X) common — None
PG (X) common — None
RDS.A (X) common — Int/Div
TOT (X) common — Int/Div
Raymond James Bank Deposit Program (X) — Interest
Chase Checking — Interest
Chase Savings — Interest
Spouse's income — 2014 — Parmer, Cram, Caton & James Law Firm
Part VII
Line 14: Share in ABA Retirement Profit Sharing Plan. Participant's share is invested in the All Cap Index Equity Fund, a mutual fund and in 4 self-managed
account investing in Dreyfus Appreciation Mutual Fund. | wish to report here that for the year 2011 1 reported on Line 16 of Part VII that there was no reportable
income from this retirement plan. In 2011, unknown to me, the self-managed fund was transferred into a separate Ameritrade account, which began sending
statements that reflected the amount of the dividends eamed by the Dreyfus Appreciation Mutual Fund. The statements from the ABA Retirement plan reported
only values, not income. Because the transfer was unknown to me until recently, | was confused about the Ameritrade reports, but reported the 012 and 2013
dividends in the FD R for those years because the values of the self-managed account, reflected in the ABA reports were identical to the value in the Ameitrade
report... Now that I have had time to conduct further research, it hus become clear to me that 1 should have reported the Amenitrude dividends for the self-managed
account as income in 2011. Line 16 in the 2011 FDR report should read as follows:
Year Description of Asset B(1) Income Amount B(2) Type C(1) Gross Value Amount C(2) Value Method
2011 Law Firm 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan
C dividend
[¢]
T
Sbuannskanstnansasnas nn
0000000000 0080500000000 A 8A
Line 16 Undivided 1/8 interest in a piece of property in Dallas, Dallas County, Texas. Date of appraisal December 6, 1994
Se a — Se ——————
—————
re RS a Ee Te
er —————————————
er —————
BE ———
Line 26 Should read "COP (X)" common.. The computer would not allow me to enter anything but "COP."
Line 36, 37 From 2005 to 2010 and again from 2012 to date | have had an interest bearing checking account that 1 mistakenly thought was non-reportable. 1
opened in 2012 a savings account. I would like to correct the error by reporting, here, the information that should have been reported on these accounts mn Part
VII:
Year Description of Asset B(1) Income Amount B(2) Type C(1) Gross Value Amount C(2) Value Method
2005: Chase Checking Account
A interest
J
A interest
2006 Chase Checking Account
2007 Chase Checking Account
A interest
2008 Chase Checking Account
A interest
2009 Chase Checking Account
A interest
None
K
2010 Chase Checking Account
2011 Chase Checking Account
None
K
2012 Chase Checking Account
A interest
Chase Savings Account
A interest
L
A terest
2013 Chase Checking Account
Chase Savings Account
A interest
K
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.