Francisco Augusto Besosa
2010
Ask Donna
Pull out the substance of this filing.
What was filed
22
investments
1
positions
0
gifts
0
agreements
2
debts
0
reimbursements
0
income
2
spouse income
Named parties
- note In part VIII
- note in part VIII
- FILIAL AMOR CORPORATION (CLOSELY HELD)
- UBSINVESTMENT ACCOUNT
- CARIBE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
- PUERTO RICO GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE - SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE - SALARY
- DOCTOR JURIS, INC. - BAR REVIEW COURSE INSTRUCTOR - DIVIDEND INCOME AND PROFESSIONAL FEES
As filed
Onental Group - Diversified Growth IRA — None
Oriental Group - Diversified Growth IRA — None
Filial Amor Corp - common stock — None — note In part VIII
Sharein FAHBU, S.E — None
Doctor Juns, Inc. - common stock — None
ESTATES #1, #2, and #4 (see lines 7 - 14) — None — note in part VIII
GNMA unit 093 — None
GNMA unit 083 — None
GNMA unit 084 — None
GNMA unit 081 — None
GNMA unit 082 — None
GNMA unit 081 — None
PR Commonwealth Indl. Dev. Co. Rev Rdfg — None
ESTATE #3 (see line 17) — None
George Putman Fund of Boston CI - A — None
BROKERAGE ACCOUNT #1 — None
GNMA unit 052 (Y) — None — Sold
GNMA unit 054 (Y) — None — Sold
GNMA unit 055 (Y) — None — Sold
GNMA unit 058 — None
Stocks of PR AAA — None
Scotia Bank - cash in bank — None
PRESIDENT - TREASURER, FILIAL AMOR CORPORATION (CLOSELY HELD)
Liability — UBSINVESTMENT ACCOUNT — MARGIN LOAN
Liability — CARIBE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION — AUTO LOAN
Spouse's income — 2010 — PUERTO RICO GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE - SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE - SALARY
Spouse's income — 2010 — DOCTOR JURIS, INC. - BAR REVIEW COURSE INSTRUCTOR - DIVIDEND INCOME AND PROFESSIONAL FEES
PART VIL
Line 3) This is a closely held corporatio
These shares are not publicly traded.
Line 6) ESTATES #1, #2, and #4 are invested in one account in Santander Security.
Line 7) GNMA unit 094 was redeemed for the amount of $25,000 on August 15,2008. This transaction was erroneosly omitted in the 2008 FDR and erroneously
informed in the 2009 FDR.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.