James Knoll Gardner
2003
Ask Donna
Pull out the substance of this filing.
What was filed
0
investments
0
positions
0
gifts
0
agreements
0
debts
0
reimbursements
0
income
0
spouse income
As filed
(Indicate part of Report.)
1. Re Part VII, Line 22: Brokerage Account #2 (Custodial Account #1) does not qualify for reporting this period because the account owner is over age 21
and is not a dependent of the reporting person within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. §152), and therefore is not a dependent
I as defined in section 102(e)(2) of the Ethics in Goverument Act of 1978, as amended, 5 U.S.C. §102(e)(2). Moreover, the account does not qualify
for reporting this period because its sole asset (City Bank, NA, Bank Deposit Program) did not have a fair market value in excess of $1,000 at the end of
the cuerent year (December 31, 2003) 2nd because income in excess of $200 from the asset was not received during the current reporting period.
2. Re Part V1, line 31: On March 31, 2003 Smith Bamey Premium Total Return Fund Class A mutual fund changed i% name to Smith Bamey Capital
and Income Fund Class A (See Part VTI, line 36).
3. Re Part VIL, line 36: On March 31, 2003 the former Smith Barney Premium Total Return Fund Class A mutual fund (See Part VII, line 31) changed its
name to Smith Barney Capital and Income Fund Class A mutual fund.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.