James Knoll Gardner

2003

Ask Donna

Pull out the substance of this filing.

Parts of this filing are redacted in the source. Gaps below are the filing's, not ours.

What was filed

  • 0

    investments

  • 0

    positions

  • 0

    gifts

  • 0

    agreements

  • 0

    debts

  • 0

    reimbursements

  • 0

    income

  • 0

    spouse income

As filed

(Indicate part of Report.)

1. Re Part VII, Line 22: Brokerage Account #2 (Custodial Account #1) does not qualify for reporting this period because the account owner is over age 21

and is not a dependent of the reporting person within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. §152), and therefore is not a dependent

I as defined in section 102(e)(2) of the Ethics in Goverument Act of 1978, as amended, 5 U.S.C. §102(e)(2). Moreover, the account does not qualify

for reporting this period because its sole asset (City Bank, NA, Bank Deposit Program) did not have a fair market value in excess of $1,000 at the end of

the cuerent year (December 31, 2003) 2nd because income in excess of $200 from the asset was not received during the current reporting period.

2. Re Part V1, line 31: On March 31, 2003 Smith Bamey Premium Total Return Fund Class A mutual fund changed i% name to Smith Bamey Capital

and Income Fund Class A (See Part VTI, line 36).

3. Re Part VIL, line 36: On March 31, 2003 the former Smith Barney Premium Total Return Fund Class A mutual fund (See Part VII, line 31) changed its

name to Smith Barney Capital and Income Fund Class A mutual fund.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.