Joan B. Gottschall
2004
Ask Donna
Pull out the substance of this filing.
What was filed
26
investments
4
positions
1
gifts
0
agreements
0
debts
0
reimbursements
0
income
1
spouse income
Named parties
- Caremark c/steck
- *passim
- Visiting Committee to the Divinity School, University of Chicago
- Illinois Humanities Council
- Martin Marty Center at the University of Chicago Divinity School
- The Rhodes Trust
- Umon League Club of Chicago
As filed
Vanguard Wellington Fund — Int/Div
Vanguard Wellesley Fund — Int/Div
Vanguard Index Trust — Int/Div
Vanguard Prime Portfolio — Int/Div
Yan Kampen Emerging Growth Fund — Int/Div
Eaton Vance Muni Bond Fund — Int/Div
US Treasury Strip (11-13-09) — None
Fed Empl Credit Union Accts — Interest
IBM common stock — Int/Div
Pimco Total Return Fund — Int/Div — Sell
Sr.Hi Inc Port — Int/Div
Viacom c/stock Class A — Int/Div
Viacom c/stock Class B — Int/Div
Munder Net Net Fund — None
Flextronics ¢/stock — None
Hewlett-Packard ¢/stock — Int/Div
ADVP c/stock — None — Merger — Caremark c/steck
Dycom c/stock — None
MVSN co/stock — None
MFS Mid-Cap Growth Fund B — None
Putnam New Value Fund — Int/Div
MEFS Utilities Fund — Int/Div
MFS Govt Securities Fund — Int/Div
MFS Value Fund B — Int/Div
MFS Large Cap Growth — None
Morgan Stanley Active Asscts Money Trist — Int/Div — d — *passim
Merober, Visiting Committee to the Divinity School, University of Chicago
Member, Board of Barecio s, Illinois Humanities Council
Member, Board of Direchrs, Martin Marty Center at the University of Chicago Divinity School
4, Chair, Distict Sclechon Conumities, The Rhodes Trust
Gift — Umon League Club of Chicago — Reduced annual dues for udges
Spouse's income — Oll AE 1.
FEC EAAL BUILDING, \OCKEOCE 83
S44 KING STREET
Juoae A, Lanike Awozheck, JI
WILNINGTON, OELAWARE [06801
TELEPHONE
duoee Fuamdiin §, BiLiIinae, Ju
June Jowuw FP. Fuliaw
CONI 130 879-0160
PFYISI 487-0100
MamiaTRATE Mawar L Jose Ja
Juomg Joun B. Jowse
Jubee NaThasige RN. Jomgp
October 23,
1991
®R. TOWNEAEND aCPINOON
Juoes Roegmy C. Jowee
CouneEL
Juoet Heuer A, POLITE
FT: 830-08m7
Juvoes Davie Bim
Juoat Noec¢ey M Tasssya
duoes Josten L. Tavao
duces PavarCre M. Ward
Juoey Nimax H. Waso
Jvodae James OB. ZaoeL
Juoas Wacvee £ SrseLEv0w
Craimmag
Tho UW
—-——t wr ew
2norable Jean B.
Cottschall
United States District Court
219 South Dearborn Street
Chicago, Illinois
60604
Re:
t No.
828
Dear Judge Gottschall:
In 1986,
1987,
and 1988 you,
along with
edited and proofread a manuscript on a non-legal subje
-
The manuscript was published as a book by
SEE. hc book is selling well enough to produce income for its
publisher, author, and editors.
who reside in canada
have proposed formation of a partnership under Canadian laws whose
assets will be all the rights to the book.
The partners will be
and you.
After the partnership is
formed,
will, in turn,
be dissolved and the assets transferred
to a Canadian corporation whose shareholders will be the partners
of the dissolved partnership.
After the partnership is formed,
your sole role will be to serve as a shareholder.
As a sharehold-
er,
you will share in proceeds arising from the sales of the book
and the use of the rights to the book.
You ask whether you may
participate in this arrangement without trancgressing either the
Code of Conduct for United States Judges or the Ethics Reform Act
of 1989.
The receipt of income from writing or editing a book is
permitted under the Code of Conduct.
Canon 5A says,
"A judge may
write
ror
on non-legal subjects."
The Committee believes that
editing and proofreading
are
activities covered by the word
wwriting."
And the Committee has approved,
at least implicitly,
Advisory Opinion No.
55.
the receipt of income from writing.
There are restrictiens on the manner in which a judge's name may ba
used in the promotion of a book, but, we assume, these restrictions
are not likely to be involved In your case since you are not the
author and your name is unlikely to be used in connection with
selling of the book.
Nor is there anything about the nature of the
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.