Joel Martin Flaum
2006
Ask Donna
Pull out the substance of this filing.
What was filed
0
investments
3
positions
1
gifts
0
agreements
0
debts
1
reimbursements
0
income
0
spouse income
Named parties
- ortiwesteru .N1V. oC100.. OI ..aw 1s1ting (Ouulttee¢ ‘renamec.. Nort western Law Boarc)
- 1e Chicazo nn of Court
- \merican Inns of Court ‘ouncation
- Union League Clu» Chricago. I. inois
- Ue Coces i (See Col. CT, D3).
As filed
Chairman Emeritus, ortiwesteru .N1V. oC100.. OI ..aw 1s1ting (Ouulttee¢ ‘renamec.. Nort western Law Boarc)
» Counse._.or, 1e Chicazo nn of Court
. ~ oz Member, Boarc oI: Trustees, \merican Inns of Court ‘ouncation
Gift — Union League Clu» Chricago. I. inois — Feceral. Judicial. Guest Privileges
Reimbursement — Ue Coces i (See Col. CT, D3). — Ly. en 000,00 = 0100,000 ccm M= 51,000,000 Bool -$5,000,000- P2= P4=More than $50,000,000
VII. Page1 INVESTMENTS and TRUSTS -- income, value, transactions (Includes those of
spouse and dependent children. See pp. 34-60 of Instructions.)
al
durin
he
2
Faas
(No reportable income,
[] NONE
assets, or transactions.)
Checking/Savings Account
1.
The. Northern Trust Co.
Cc
int.
dt.
ff rr]
Chicago, Illinois
2.1%
Capital contributions
related to law firm*
D
int.
M
Contri-
! S-
ution
12104
X SS
partnership, The Northern
tx
ust Co., Chicago, Illinois
3.
Savings Plan/401(k)
related to law firm*
—_—
: A
I
Bank of Oklahoma
Contri-
1/06-
D
int.
L
D
Tulsa, Oklahoma
bution
,. |x Partner Cash Balance
1
Program related to law
tf —
F
int.
0
Contri-
1/06
& firm* partnership
L
bution
12/06
).|x Checking Account
Amalgamated Ban
A
int.
bese Chicago, Illinois
i)
Savings Account
"7" Amalgamated Bank
Chicago, Illinois
C
int.
M
xX
L
14
15 *Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP
16
17
——
To
Incom
Cod
1,000
=$1,001-$2,50
25 01-%
15,00
(See C
100,000
G=
000,0
H2=More than $5,000,00
0,0
alue
des
less
04
50,0
00
00,000
100;0
50,000
500,
01
0
0!
00
0,001-350;
000,000
than $50;000,000
aly
Pp
R=(os|
ec Ci
Ra]
V=01
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.