Fortunato Pedro Benavides
2011Annual
Ask Donna
Pull out the substance of this filing.
What was filed
15
investments
0
positions
0
gifts
0
agreements
0
debts
0
reimbursements
1
income
1
spouse income
Named parties
- State of Texas Judicu! Retirement System monthly benefits tor vear
- Southwest Airlines (flight attendant)
As filed
Chase Bank of TX, Austin TX, Related Ckg & Sav. Acct. — Interest
Univ, Fed. Credit Union, Austin, TX: IRA Saving Acct. — Interest
Prnciple Financial Group, Common Stock — Int/Div
Invesco American Franchise Fund (VAFAX). See VIII. — None
Invesco Global Core Equity Fund (AWSAX), See VII, — None
A01K-Vanguard Institutional Index Fund — None
401K-Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund — None
401K-EuroPac Growth Fund-RS (RERFX) — None
401K-Dodge&Cox Stock Fund — None
SW Airlines Profit Sharing Plan-Harbor Capital Appreciation — None
SW Airlines Profit Sharing Plan-EuroPac Gr, Fund-RS(RERFX) — None
SWAirlines Profit Sharing-Dodge& Cox Stock Fund — None
SWAirlines Profit Sharing- Vanguard Inst Index Fund — None
Rovalty Interest, Starr County, TX — Rovalty
University Federal Credit Union, Austin, TX wn — Interest
Income — 2011 — State of Texas Judicu! Retirement System monthly benefits tor vear — S60.000.00
Spouse's income — 2011 — Southwest Airlines (flight attendant)
VIL Item 4 from last year's report referred to us ACPAX did not exist at the end of the 2011 calendar year, On May 30, 2011, ACPAX was reorganized, merged
with, and acquired by Invesco American Franchise Fund (VAFAX). No gain or loss was occasioned by the merger and shares of the former ACPAX were
replaced by the VAFAX shares.
VIL Item 5 from last year's report referred to as VGFAX did not exist at the end of the 2011 calendar year. On May 30, 2011, VGFAX was reorganized, merged
with, and acquired by Invesco Global Equity Fund (AWSAX). No gain or loss was occasioned by the merger and shares of the former VGFAX were replaced by
the AWSAX shares.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.