William V Altenberger

ira with lifemark

venzon — Int/Div

exelon — Int/Div

vodaphone — Int/Div

cefcu (credit union) — Interest

cefeu (credit union) — Interest

cefeu (credit union) — Interest

PNC bank — Interest

cash & money market wtih lifemark — Interest

caterpillar — Int/Div

irs with lifemark

cash & money market with lifemark — Interest

abbott labs — Int/Div

mel — Int/Div

pohnson& phnson — Int/Div

nuveen qualify preerred mcome fund 2 — Int/Div

virtus global dividend &income fund — Interest

microsoft — Int/Div

cisco — Int/Div

duke energy — Int/Div

visa — Int/Div

first energy — Int/Div — Buy

enbridge, inc — Int/Div — from line 22)

abbvue — Int/Div

boardwalk — Int/Div

fannie mae — Int/Div

caterpillar — Int/Div

cash account lifemark — Interest

at — Int/Div

alcatel-lucent — Int/Div

century link — Int/Div

fannie mae — Int/Div

exxon mobile — Int/Div

boardwalk energy — Int/Div

idearc — Int/Div

southern co — Interest

amazon — Int/Div — Buy

frontier communications — Int/Div

john hancock pfd income fd sh ben int — Int/Div

john hancock pfd income fd 111 fund — Int/Div — Buy

ge — Int/Div

cash account lifemark — Int/Div

john hancockpreferred income fund 11 — Int/Div

spectra energy — Int/Div

caterpillar — Int/Div

brighthouse financial — Int/Div — from line 48)

metlife — Int/Div

visa — Int/Div

Section vii lines 5.6,8.9.39.40 sc financial group replaced by lifemark

Section vii line 44 the computer program would not allow me to enter the following:

" merged into line 20"

Section vii lines 39,40, &41 the 2016 report line 46 and previous reports contained a reference to a John Hancock fund. It was not complete and pursuant to your

comment rearding section vii, line 39 1 made the corrections to lines 39 and 40, which corrections along with the entry on line 43 lists all the phn hancock funds

Section vii, line 47 of the 2016 report listed "premier bank (od)”, but was not listed on the 2017 report as it had at somepoint been redeemed and should not have

been listed in the 2016 report. By not previously reporting the redemption, there was an incorrect inclusion amd not and not an exclusion