Case law

Brown v. Zoning Board of Appeals

391 A.2d 348 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 27, 1978

Brown and Jalón Brown, plaintiffs herein, petitioned defendant for an exception to the Town’s zoning ordinance. Defendant denied the petition. … Glover v. Smith, 126 Me. 397 , 138 A. 770 (1927).

Board of Dental Examiners v. Brown

448 A.2d 881 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 4, 1982

Brown alleging incompetence and un-skillfulness in the practice of dentistry and seeking a revocation of his license. The Board alleged that deficiencies in Dr. … See Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners, 288 Or. 293 , 605 P.2d 273 (1980).

Brown v. Brown

66 Me. 316 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 23, 1876

Wyman v. Brown, 50 Maine, 139. And the grantor may “reserve full power and control over the land thus conveyed during his natural life.” Drown v. Smith, 52 Maine, 141; but not over the deed. … But in Cook v. Brown, 34 N. H., 460, after a very elaborate discussion and thorough examination of authorities, Shed v.

Brown v. Brown

929 A.2d 476 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 17, 2007

Carolan v. … Pillsbury v. Pillsbury, 2007 ME 46, ¶ 4 , 918 A.2d 1210, 1211 ; Williams v. St. Pierre, 2006 ME 10, ¶ 8, 889 A.2d 1011, 1013 ; Murphy v.

Brown v. Brown

110 Me. 280 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 12, 1913

The following cases are of that class: Quinebaug Bank v. Tarbox, 20 Conn., 510 ; Downer v. Garland, 21 Vt., 362 ; Blackwood v. Brown, 34 Mich., 4 ; State v. Dougherty, 45 Mo., 294 ; Griffin v. … Gibbs, 75 Iowa, 537 ; Trawick v. Martin Brown Co., 74 Texas, 522 ; Grider v. Appersen Co., 32 Ark., 332; Chamberlain v. Eckert, 2 Biss., 124 ; Moore v. Hopkins, 83 Cal., 270 ; Dyer v.

Mank v. Green

323 F. Supp. 2d 115 · District Court, D. Maine · May 24, 2004

Co. v. … Cohen v. Brown University, 101 F.3d 155, 169 (1st Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1186 , 117 S.Ct. 1469 , 137 L.Ed.2d 682 (1997).

Board of Overseers of the Bar v. Brown

623 A.2d 1268 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 20, 1993

Board of Overseers of the Bar v. Dineen, 500 A.2d 262, 264 (Me.1985). There must be competent evidence in the record, however, to support a factual finding. See Harmon v. Emerson, 425 A.2d 978, 981 (Me.1981). … Ricker v. United States, 417 F.Supp. 133, 140 (D.Me.1976); 33 M.R.S.A. § 161 (1988).

Brown v. Brown

14 Me. 317 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1837

R. 122 , and Whiting v. Smith, 13 Pick. 364 . There are, however, opposing authorities; and the principle upon which these cases rest, has not been adopted by any judicial decision in this State. … Holt v. Scholefield, 6 T. R. 691; Hawkes v. Hawkey, 8 East, 427. It is true, it is stated in the declaration, by way of inuendo, that the defendant meant to charge the plaintiff with the crime of stealing.

In Re Compact Disc Minimum Advertised Price Antitrust Litigation

456 F. Supp. 2d 131 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 2, 2006

(quoting Weese v. … Servs., Inc. v.

Charlton v. Town of Oxford

774 A.2d 366 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 12, 2001

Brown v. Watson, 47 Me. 161, 162 (1859); see also Penley v. City of Auburn, 85 Me. 278 , 27 A. 158 (1893). … Whitmore v. Brown, 102 Me. 47, 57 , 65 A. 516, 520 (1906).

Libby v. Concord General Mutual Insurance

452 A.2d 979 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 3, 1982

Defosses v. Notis, 333 A.2d 83, 86 (Me.1975). The relationship of agency, however, may be either “actual” or “apparent” in its derivation. Stevens v. Frost, 140 Me. 1, 7 , 32 A.2d 164, 167 (1943). … Brown v. Manchester, 384 A.2d 449 , 453 n. 4 (Me.1978) (emphasis in original) (citing Restatement (Second) of Agency § 8 (1958)). In the present case, plaintiffs argue facts that might suggest such authority.

Ford Motor Company v. Darling's

86 A.3d 35 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 21, 2014

See McGee v. … See State v.

Peerless Insurance Co. v. Brennon

564 A.2d 383 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 6, 1989

Brackett v. Middlesex Ins. Co., 486 A.2d 1188, 1189 (Me.1985). … Co. v. Elwell, 513 A.2d 269, 271 (Me.1986). Nevertheless, “[t]he court must interpret unambiguous language in a contract according to its plain and commonly accepted meaning.” Brackett v. Middlesex Ins.

Brown v. Thaler

880 A.2d 1113 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 22, 2005

Uotinen v. Hall, 636 A.2d 991, 992 (Me.1994). [¶ 9] Brown relies on our decision in Phillips v. … See Lewien v.

Board of Overseers of the Bar v. Donald F. Brown

301 A.3d 793 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 24, 2023

BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR v. DONALD F. BROWN PER CURIAM [¶1] Donald F. … Most v. Most, 477 A.2d 250, 258 (Me. 1984); see Brown v.

Brown v. Lunt

37 Me. 423 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1854

Fowler v. Bebee, 9 Mass. 231 ; Nason v. Dillingham, 15 Mass. 170 ; Bucknam v. Ruggles, 15 Mass. 180 ; Commonwealth v. Kirby, 2 Cush. 577 ; Plymouth v. … Heywood v Hildreth, 9 Mass. 393 ; Brown v. Maine Bank, 11 Mass. 133 ; Waterhouse v. Waite, 11 Mass. 207 ; Cushing v. Arnold, 9 Met. 26 . But in Allen v.

Brown v. Chadbourne

31 Me. 9 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1849

Berry v. Carle, 3 Greenl. 269; Spring v. Russell & al. 7 Greenl. 273. … In Berry v. Carle, Shaw v. Crawford, 10 Johns. R. 236, Scott v. Wilson, 3 N. H. 321, the right is considered as dependent on long usage.

Maddox v. Brown

71 Me. 432 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 19, 1880

Herlihy v. Smith, 116 Mass. 265 . So in Sheridan v. … Howe v. Newmarch, 12 Allen, 49 . The relation of master and servant must exist at the time of the injui-y.

Brown v. Habrle

940 A.2d 1091 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 29, 2008

Brown v. Habrle, 2006 ME 115 , 908 A.2d 640 . Habrle filed his objections to the referee’s report following the remand. After a hearing on Habrle’s objections, the . … See Robinson v. Robinson, 2000 ME 101, ¶ 12 , 751 A.2d 457, 460 .

Brown v. Rice

57 Me. 55 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1869

Commonwealth v. Weymouth, 2 Allen, 145 . Chief Justice Shaw, in Stickney v.