Case law

Brown v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

411 F. Supp. 1001 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 10, 1975

Brown v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

486 A.2d 37 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 1984

In Brown v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 413 A.2d 1276 (D.C.1980) (Brown I), we noted that two lawyers with intervenor Carr’s law firm, Iverson Mitchell and C. … Brown v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, No. 13670 (D.C. July 15, 1983) (Brown II). Again, the division remanded the record to the BZA. Id., slip op. at 27.

Brown v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

413 A.2d 1276 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 1980

See also Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 293 A.2d 470, 474 (1972) (contested case hearing inadequate because of Board’s failure to swear in witnesses). … See also Wilson v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 289 A.2d 380, 383-84 (1964).

Brown v. BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS

662 F. Supp. 2d 41 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 28, 2009

Broadcasting Board of Governors Fact Sheet, available at http://www.bbg.gov/ about/documents/BBGFactSheet2-09.pdf. 2 . This case has a relatively complicated procedural history. See, e.g., Brown v. … Brown's motion to enforce purported oral settlement *44 agreement); Brown v. Tomlinson, 383 F.Supp.2d 26 (D.D.C.2005) (granting the BBG's first motion for summary judgment); Brown v.

Brown v. District of Columbia Public Employee Relations Board

19 A.3d 351 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 12, 2011

Public Employee Relations Board v. Washington Teachers’ Union Local 6, 556 A.2d 206, 207 (D.C.1989). … Vann v. District of Columbia Board of Funeral Directors, 441 A.2d 246, 247-248 (D.C.1982).

GEORGE L. SYDNOR v. UNITED STATES

129 A.3d 909 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 14, 2016

See Cannon v. … Brown v. United States, 627 A.2d 499, 508 (D.C. 1993). 2 Thus, it is possible to commit burglary without violating the unlawful entry statute. See, e.g., Parker v.

NATIONAL ASS'N OF WATERFRONT EMPLOYERS v. Solis

665 F. Supp. 2d 10 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 27, 2009

See Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 302-03 , 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979). … In August of 2007, the Benefits Review Board instituted its own rule requiring that decisions and orders issued by the Board use claimants’ initials. 4 .

Brown v. Regan

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 16, 2022

Brown v. Echeveria-Burkes, No. 21-cv-3013, ECF No. 4 at 1. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

Ruiz v. Vilsack

763 F. Supp. 2d 168 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 9, 2011

Welcome Ctr. v. … Guillen v.

United States v. William A. Nash, Jr. and David Lewis

100 A.3d 157 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 25, 2014

See generally, e.g., Perkins v. … Mullin v. Brown, 115 P.3d 139, 143 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005) (“This court may not disregard a clear holding of our supreme court on the purported ground that the analysis supporting it is incomplete.”)

Thorp v. District of Columbia

142 F. Supp. 3d 132 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 5, 2015

Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 407 (1997). … Brown v. Argenbright Sec., Inc., 782 A.2d 752, 757 (D.C. 2001) (quoting Boykin v.

Lutes v. Goldin

62 F. Supp. 2d 118 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 30, 1999

Defendant now cites to Brown v. … The rationale in Brown has been extended to the ADEA as well. Thorne v. Cavazos, 744 F.Supp. 348, 351-52 (D.D.C.1990). 19 .

Brown v. Brown

343 A.2d 59 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 14, 1975

Brown, is your position the same? THE PLAINTIFF: As what counsel just said? THE COURT: Yes. THE PLAINTIFF: Yes. … Schanck v. Jones, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 148, 229 F.2d 31 (1956); Brewood v. Cook, 92 U.S.App.D.C. 386, 207 F.2d 439 (1953).

Brown v. Paulson

541 F. Supp. 2d 379 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 1, 2008

v. … Hardison v. Alexander, 655 F.2d 1281, 1288 (D.C.Cir.1981); see also Allen, 449 U.S. at 94 , 101 S.Ct. 411 . In the previous action filed by counsel on May 22, 2003 (Brown v.

Brown v. Brown

384 A.2d 632 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 1977

See Piotrowski v. Piotrowski, 71 Mich.App. 213 , 247 N.W.2d 354, 355 (1976); Kruzel v. Podell, 67 Wis.2d 138, 151 , 226 N.W.2d 458, 464 (1975); Petition of Hauptly, 262 Ind. 150 , 312 N.E.2d 857, 859 (1974); Egner v. … Piotrowski v. Piotrowski, supra at 214, 247 N.W.2d at 355 ; Custer v. Bonadies, 30 Conn.Supp. 385 , 318 A.2d 639 (1974); Application of Halligan, supra; Petition of Hauptly, supra, 312 N.E.2d at 860 .

Kelby R. Gordon v. United States

120 A.3d 73 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 23, 2015

v. … v.

Brown v. Brown

75 A.2d 140 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 3, 1950

Ct. 13 , 76 L.Ed. 537 ; Rosenberg v. Rosenberg, 152 Md. 49 , 135 A. 840 ; Plant v. Plant, D.C.Mun.App., 57 A.2d 204 ; 2C.J.S., Divorce, § 328. 3 . Sistare v. Sistare, supra; Cotter v. … Cotter, 9 Cir., 225 F. 471 ; Phillips v. Kepler, 47 App.D.C. 384 ; see also Bar-her v. Barber, 21 How. 582 , 16 L.Ed. 226 ; Lynde v. Lynde, 181 U.S. 183 , 21 S. Ct. 555 , 45 L.Ed. 810 . 4 . Sistare v.

Brown v. Brown

524 A.2d 1184 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 1987

See Gibson v. … Brown offered no convincing corroborating evidence to prove the existence of an agreement with his sister.

Brown v. District of Columbia

919 F. Supp. 2d 105 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 29, 2013

Plaintiff Stephanie Yvonne Brown (“plaintiff’ or “Brown”) brings this action against the University of the District of Columbia David A. … See Mastro v. Potomac Elec. Power Co., 447 F.3d 843, 850 (D.C.Cir.2006); George v. Leavitt, 407 F.3d 405, 412 (D.C.Cir.2005); Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999).

Bogan v. District of Columbia Board of Parole

749 A.2d 127 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 2000

See Smith v. United States, 597 A.2d 377 , 380 n. 2 (D.C.1991). The Board has been replaced by the U.S. … “We do not review the merits of the Board’s decision in denying parole, and are limited to a review of the procedures used by the Board in reaching its decision.” Smith v.