Case law

Beedy v. District of Columbia

126 F.2d 647 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 16, 1942

Prior to the Board’s decision in this case we had decided Sweeney v. … See cases cited in footnote 6 in the Murphy case, and see also Anderson v. Watt, 138 U.S. 694, 706 , 11 S.Ct. 449 , 34 L.Ed. 1078 ; Gilbert v. David, 235 U. S. 561, 569 , 35 S.Ct. 164 , 59 L.Ed. 360 ; Williamson v.

A. v. Bamford v. Federal Communications Commission

535 F.2d 78 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 6, 1976

Radio Athens, Inc., (WATH) v. F. C. C., 130 U. … Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1 , 85 S.Ct. 792 , 13 L.Ed.2d 616 (1965); Power Reactor Development Co. v.

Holley v. Guiffrida

112 F.R.D. 172 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 18, 1986

Holley v. Guiffrida, No. 85-3266. As such, the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel barred plaintiff’s effort to reopen his unsuccessful litigation. See, Brown v. … Civ.Jud.Pro. and Rules, 34 (citing Browning Debenture Holders Committee v. DASA Corp., 560 F.2d 1078 (2d Cir.1977)). The Court finds that sanctions against plaintiff are warranted here.

Sohm v. Dillon

231 F. Supp. 973 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 10, 1964

This Court is not permitted to sit in judgment on this officer’s fitness for promotion or on the propriety of the action of the promotion board. As stated *975 in Payson v. … The plaintiff urges the recent case of Roberts v. Vance, - F.2d - (D.C.Cir. 1964), in support of his motion.

District of Columbia v. Jones

442 A.2d 512 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 19, 1982

See Board of Regents v. Roth, supra, 408 U.S. at 577, 92 S.Ct. at 2709 . … Money v. Cullinane, supra at 1000 . Wells v. District of Columbia Board of Education, D.C.

John Foster Dulles v. Otto Nathan

225 F.2d 29 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 23, 1955

The memorandum does not say what the Board reported or recommended, or why. It does not suggest that the Board had new information. … Since they clearly are, they “will be dismissed as moot and the case remanded to the District Court with directions to vacate its judgment”, Acheson v.

United States v. Smithen

738 F. Supp. 15 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 25, 1990

See United States v. Winston, 892 F.2d 112, 117 (D.C.Cir.1989); United States v. Baskin, 886 F.2d 383, 386-87 (D.C.Cir.1989). … In Schneckloth v.

Farley v. United States

694 A.2d 887 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 22, 1997

Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 441 , 115 S.Ct. 1555, 1569 , 131 L.Ed.2d 490 (1995). In this context, “[a] ‘reasonable probability’ is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.” United States v. … Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). .

District of Columbia v. Jones

38 App. D.C. 560 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 22, 1912

Knox County v. Ninth Nat. Bank, 147 U. S. 91 — 97, 37 L. ed. 93—95, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 267; Nofire v. United States, 164 U. S. 657 -660, 41 L. ed. 588-590, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 212; Guthrie Nat. Bamk v. Guthrie, 173 U. … Pillsbury v. Brown, 82 Me. 453 , 9 L.R.A. 94 , 19 Atl. 858 ; Thomas v. Ford, 63 Md. 346 , 52 Am. Rep. 513 ; Blossom v. Cannon, 14 Mass. 177 ; Langdon v. State, 23 Neb. 509 , 37 N. W. 79 . In Nealy v.

Washington Area Carpenters' Welfare Fund v. Overhead Door Co.

488 F. Supp. 816 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 22, 1980

See Lewis v. Benedict Coal Corp., 361 U.S. 459 , 80 S.Ct. 489 , 4 L.Ed.2d 442 (1960) (union breached contract by striking); Huge v. … Huge v. Long’s Hauling Co., at 465.

Mallgren v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 9, 2025

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678–79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668- 71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Here, Plaintiff’s ambiguous allegations fall well short of providing notice of any claim or establishing this Court’s subject matter jurisdiction.

Alphonso Marcus v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U. S. Department of Labor

548 F.2d 1044 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 28, 1976

The findings of fact in the decision under review by the Board shall be conclusive if supported by substantial evidence in the record considered as a whole. 33 U.S.C. § 921 (b)(3) (Supp. V, 1975). … See also Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Dir., Office of Workers’ Comp. Programs, 542 F.2d 602, 605-06 (3d Cir. 1976); Offshore Food Service, Inc. v. Benefits Review Board, 524 F.2d 967, 968 (5th Cir. 1975). 17 .

JOSEPHINE REYES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES

150 A.3d 1277 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 29, 2016

Fluellyn v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 54 A.3d 1156, 1159 (D.C. 2012) (quoting Mills v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 838 A.2d 325, 328 (D.C. 2003)); D.C. … Code § 1-623.24 (b)(1). 3 See generally MorphoTrust USA, Inc. v.

Qualls v. Rumsfeld

357 F. Supp. 2d 274 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 7, 2005

Cinciarelli v. Carter, 662 F.2d 73, 78 (D.C.Cir.1981); Woodrick v. Hungerford, 800 F.2d 1413, 1416 (5th Cir.1986); Pence v. Brown, 627 F.2d 872, 874 (8th Cir.1980); Castle v. … Caldera, 74 F.Supp.2d 4, 8-9 (D.D.C.1999) (citing numerous cases); Brown v.

Davis v. D.C. Department of Corrections

623 F. Supp. 2d 77 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 11, 2009

See Johnson v. … V 8c. 5 .

Potomac Iron Works v. Love

673 F.2d 537 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 19, 1982

Likewise, in the case of a formal hearing, appeal is to the Board. Id. The Board, in either circumstance, has jurisdiction in cases raising “a substantial question of law or fact.” Id. … Bradshaw v. McCarthy, Inc., 3 B.R.B.S. 195, B.R.B. Nos. 75-209 and 75-209A (January 26, 1976). The instant case is not a case in which attorney’s fees were awarded.

Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co. v. Order of Railway Conductors & Brakemen

265 F. Supp. 892 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 4, 1967

of Locomotive Engineers v. … until the Board acts.

Miller v. Department of Navy

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 27, 2009

Miller v. Dep’t of Navy, 476 F.3d 936, 939 (D.C. Cir. 2007). More specifically, the Secretary was authorized to convene an SSB in cases in which “material unfairness” tainted the promotion selection board’s decision. … Kreis v. Sec’y of the Air Force, 866 F.2d 1508, 1511 (D.C. Cir. 1989); see also Guy v. United States, 608 F.2d 867, 874 (Ct.

Yvonne C. Edwards v. Nathan Habib

397 F.2d 687 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 11, 1968

’ ban of Brown was in reprisal for his participation in the voter registration drive. … See United States v. Beaty, supra Note 5; United States v. Bruce, supra Note 5. See also United States v. Board of Education of Greene County, Miss., 5 Cir., 332 F.2d 40 (1964); L’Orange v.

In Re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation

725 F.3d 244 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 9, 2013

Before: GARLAND, Chief Judge, BROWN, Circuit Judge, and SENTELLE, Senior Circuit Judge. … BROWN, Circuit Judge: Over the last decade, the four major freight railroads imposed rate-based fuel surcharges on shipments over their tracks.