Case law

Ibrahim v. District of Columbia

463 F.3d 3 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 8, 2006

Brown v. Johnson, 387 F.3d 1344, 1350 (11th Cir. 2004); see also Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 37 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (“[P]ro se prisoner complaints should be ‘liberally construed.’”) … See, e.g., Brown, 387 F.3d at 1350 (“[T]he afflictions of which Brown currently complains, including his HIV and hepatitis, and the alleged danger of more serious afflictions if he is not treated constitute imminent danger

Singh v. Bowsher

609 F. Supp. 454 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 21, 1984

Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens, 460 U.S. 711 , 103 S.Ct. 1478, 1482 , 75 L.Ed.2d 403 (1983). … Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens, 103 S.Ct. at 1482 n. 3, this Court concludes that none of the complained of actions were unlawful.

Knighten v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 16, 2014

See Moore v. … When a petitioner is on parole, however, his custodian is the parole board, which has the authority to impose conditions on his release. See Jones v. Cunningham, 371 U.S. 236, 243 (1963).

In re Bailey

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 2022

on Professional Responsibility (DDN 2015-D144; BDN 18-BD-054) (Submitted April 14, 2022 Decided October 13, 2022) Myles V. … See Varner v. District of Columbia, 891 A.2d 260, 270 (D.C. 2006) (conclusory assertion by expert witness is “insufficient to establish an objective standard of care”).

In re Bailey

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 2022

on Professional Responsibility (DDN 2015-D144; BDN 18-BD-054) (Submitted April 14, 2022 Decided October 13, 2022) Myles V. … See Varner v. District of Columbia, 891 A.2d 260, 270 (D.C. 2006) (conclusory assertion by expert witness is “insufficient to establish an objective standard of care”).

Barnett v. Weinberger

818 F.2d 953 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 15, 1987

See Complaint for Injunction (June 26, 1979), Barnett v. Brown, Civ. No. B-79-1194 (D.Md.), A.R. 161-164. . See Stipulated Motion to Dismiss (July 19, 1979), Barnett v. Brown, Civ. No. B-79-1194 (D.Md.), A.R. 156-157. . … Francis, supra note 68 , 432 U.S. at 425 n. 9, 97 S.Ct. at 2405 n. 9, 53 L.Ed.2d at 456 n. 9. .Board of Governors v.

Doe v. District of Columbia

796 F. Supp. 559 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 1, 1992

Prior to addition of this provision in 1988, the Supreme Court concluded in School Board of Nassau County v. … See Cortes v. Board of Governors, 766 F.Supp. 623, 625 (N.D.Ill.1991). 15 . In Consolidated Rail Corp. v.

International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers (Smart) - Transportation Division

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 20, 2020

A district court reached a similar result in Long Island Rail Road Co. v. National Mediation Board, No. 68-C-240, 1968 WL 9313 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 31, 1968). … Consider CSX Transportation, Inc. v. National Mediation Board, No. CIV.A. 04-0611 (RWR), 2005 WL 2297554 (D.D.C. Aug. 29, 2005)—another case SMART-TD cites.

United States v. Tdc Mgt. Corp., Inc.

263 F. Supp. 3d 257 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 13, 2017

United States v. … Vuitch v.

MacKay v. Quigg

641 F. Supp. 567 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 7, 1986

Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip Corp., 713 F.2d 1530, 1538 (Fed.Cir.1983). See Simmons Fastener Corp. v. … Fregeau v.

Gambrell v. Fulwood

950 F. Supp. 2d 109 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 18, 2013

Guidelines do not compel the Board to grant parole, as parole is never required even if all prerequisites are satisfied) (citing McRae v. … Parole Board, this would not amount to an ex post facto violation. 6 See Foster v. Booker, 595 F.3d 353, 362-63 (6th Cir. 2010).

Rastall v. CSX Corp.

696 F. Supp. 683 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 8, 1988

Air Line Dispatchers Ass’n v. National Mediation Board, 189 F.2d 685, 687, 690 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 849 , 72 S.Ct. 77 , 96 L.Ed. 641 (1951); Air Line Stewards and Stewardesses Ass’n v. … Smith v. Evening News Assn., 371 U.S. 195 , 83 S.Ct. 267 , 9 L.Ed.2d 246 (1962); Windward Shipping Ltd. v. American Radio Assn., 415 U.S. 104, 110 , 94 S.Ct. 959, 963 , 39 L.Ed.2d 195 (1974); Benz v.

In Re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation

593 F. Supp. 2d 29 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 31, 2008

See Kowal v. MCI Communications Corp., 16 F.3d at 1276 ; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). B. Rule 12(b)(1) Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. … Corp. v.

Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Southern Railway Co.

212 F. Supp. 465 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 10, 1963

, Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. … the sanction of the Board.

General Truck Drivers, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local 270 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board

252 F.2d 619 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 23, 1958

On this point we deem ourselves bound by this court’s opinion in Truck Drivers and Helpers Local Union 728, etc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 101 U.S.App.D.C. 420 , 249 F.2d 512 , decided October 28, 1957. … We therefore enforce the Board’s order.

Arnold v. Carter

251 F. Supp. 3d 269 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 9, 2017

Equal Emp’t Opportunity Comm’n v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial Sch., 117 F.3d 621, 624 (D.C. Cir. 1997); see Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015). … See Brown, 789 F.3d at 152. Still, the relief Plaintiff seeks eludes his grasp.

Harrison v. Boyd

11 F. Cas. 647 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · May 15, 1832

Cox, for the plaintiffs, also cited the case of Harrison v. Gales, special bail of Gilbert C. Russell, in this Court at December term, 1828, ( 3 Cranch, C. C. 376 ,) and Farrow v. … Brown, special bail of Russell, at thp same term; where the plaintiff was a resident of Virginia at the time of Russell’s discharge under the insolvent act of this district, and had then a suit against Russell, pending in

F.D.R. Fox v. District of Columbia

83 F.3d 1491 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 21, 1996

Lottery and Charitable Games Control Board. … Murray v.

In Re Monroe Communications Corporation

840 F.2d 942 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 4, 1988

Power Co. v. ICC, 702 F.2d 1026, 1034 (D.C.Cir.1983). … See Public Citizen Health Research Group v.

Mason Contractors Ass'n of America v. International Council of Employers of Bricklayers & Allied Craftsmen

853 F. Supp. 515 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 26, 1994

Trust Fund v. … See, e.g., Quad City Builders Ass'n v. Tri City Bricklayers Union No. 7, 431 F.2d 999 (8th Cir.1970); Mobile Mechanical Contractors Ass’n v.