Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersTX

10,000+ results

1.97s

  • Resolution Trust Corp. v. Tarrant County Appraisal District

    926 S.W.2d 797 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Aug 20, 1996

    WHAT QUALIFIES AS A CHANGE OF USE? A change of use is a physical change. The owner must stop using the land for agricultural purposes. 1990 Ag Manual, supra at 31. … Public policy forbids the suit unless consent is given, as clearly as public policy makes jurisdie *802 tion exclusive by declaration of the legislative body.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Reaves v. City of Corpus Christi

    518 S.W.3d 594 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 13, 2017

    The petition further alleged that their negligence claims qualified for a waiver of sovereign immunity through Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code section 101.021(1) because: Officer Fernandez acted within the course and … Cases in this branch have made clear that an immunity claim does not erase the established rules which apply to motions for summary judgment.

    Cited 69 timesPublished
  • Empower Texans, Inc. v. Geren

    388 F. Supp. 3d 738 · District Court, W.D. Texas · May 23, 2019

    It similarly concluded that making a speech on the House floor or speaking in a committee hearing qualifies as a legislative act. See United States v. … CONCLUSION Legislative immunity protects legislatures and legislators in establishing and applying rules that they deem most conducive to conducting legislative business.

    Reversed on other grounds by Empower Texans, Incorporated v. Charlie Ger, 977 F.3d 367 (2020)Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Stuart Thomas Gerstacker v. Kimberly Ann Gerstacker

    Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Jul 29, 2011

    This clearly qualifies as “providing goods [and] services to” LCRA. See Kirby Lake Dev., Ltd. v. … See 197 S.W.3d at 346 (“[T]he Tookes do not claim damages within [the] limitations [established by section 271.153].

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Harris County v. Louvier

    956 S.W.2d 106 · Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · Sep 18, 1997

    The County alleges in nine points of error that it is immune from suit, the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to establish it discriminated against Louvier or to support the damages awarded, the trial court submitted … As originally enacted, the Anti-Retaliation Law did not clearly and unambiguously waive governmental immunity. City of LaPorte v. Barfield, 898 S.W.2d 288, 293 (Tex.1995).

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • West Odessa Volunteer Fire Department, Inc. v. E. Roman Contreras and Martina Contreras

    549 S.W.3d 203 · Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) · Apr 12, 2018

    The court rejected the requested expansion of Section 101.021 on the basis that a statute that waives immunity must do so clearly and unambiguously. Id. at 292–94 (citing GOV’T § 311.034). … The court concluded that Section 101.062(b) does not clearly and unambiguously waive governmental immunity and, therefore, does not expand the waiver of immunity in Section 101.021. Id. at 293 (citing City of El Paso v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • The Harris Center for Mental Health and IDD v. Deborah McLeod

    Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · Apr 2, 2024

    The Harris Center argues that (1) it is a governmental unit entitled to assert immunity; and (2) it retains its immunity under the TCHRA because McLeod did not establish a prima facie case for any of her claims or raise … (concluding that entity was entitled to governmental immunity from suit based on uncontroverted affidavit from Commissioner of Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation recognizing that entity qualified

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rusk State Hospital, the State of Texas and the Texas Department of State Health Services v. Dennis Black and Pam Black, Individually and as Representatives of the Estate of Travis Bonham Black

    Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · Jun 23, 2010

    “Thomas’s summary judgment motion clearly challenged the trial court’s subject matter jurisdiction.” Id . at 339. … Van Dusen, although establishing the cause of death as asphyxiation, also fails to show how the Hospital breached the applicable standard of care.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Combs v. City of Webster

    311 S.W.3d 85 · Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · Apr 16, 2010

    This portion of the definition is not qualified or conditional in any way on the portion of the definition referring to a retailer’s “purpose” for the location. … Appellees contend that the Room-Store warehouse does not qualify under the Comptroller’s own guidelines.

    Cited 45 timesPublished
  • Bowles v. Yeganeh

    84 S.W.3d 252 · Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · Mar 14, 2002

    Because Sheriff Bowles established his immunity by establishing the good faith of his deputies in conducting the sheriffs sale, we conclude the summary judgment evidence establishes Sheriff Bowles is entitled to *253 official … Deputy Hicks stated in his affidavit that he is a duly qualified and appointed deputy sheriff for the Dallas Sheriffs Department.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Su Inn Ho v. University of Texas at Arlington

    984 S.W.2d 672 · Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo) · Nov 4, 1998

    By stating that it is “the Legislature’s sole province to waive or abrogate sovereign immunity,” the majority opinion in Federal Sign clearly reaffirmed a long line of cases standing for that general principle. … To establish the good faith element, a state employee must show that a reasonable person in the same position would have believed that his conduct was lawful according to clearly established law and according to the information

    Cited 164 timesPublished
  • Rusk State Hospital, the State of Texas and the Texas Department of State Health Services v. Dennis Black and Pam Black, Individually and as Representatives of the Estate of Travis Bonham Black

    Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · Jun 23, 2010

    ―Thomas’s summary judgment motion clearly challenged the trial court’s subject matter jurisdiction.‖ Id. at 339. … Van Dusen, although establishing the cause of death as asphyxiation, also fails to show how the Hospital breached the applicable standard of care.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Houston Independent School District

    229 F. Supp. 3d 571 · District Court, S.D. Texas · Jan 17, 2017

    Moreno, 667 F.3d 539, 551 (5th Cir. 2012); and (3) the HISD employees have qualified immunity from suit because “their conduct does not violate clear *580 ly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable … Tex. 2007) (dismissing RICO claim against individual defendant under qualified immunity) (citing Brown v. Nationsbank Corp., 188 F.3d 579, 588 (5th Cir. 1999)). Mr.

    Abrogated on other grounds by Tercero v. TX Southmost Coll Dist, 989 F.3d 291 (2021)Cited 10 timesPublished
  • In the Interest of C.S.

    214 S.W.3d 465 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 11, 2006

    Based on the adoption subsidy, the Stewarts do not meet the financial requirements to qualify as an adoptive placement for the children. … However, all of the cases cited by the ad litem rely on the following unique provision of the Texas Constitution: “it shall be the duty of the Legislature of the State to establish and make suitable provision for the support

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Linda D. Tanner v. Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Julia Murray, Wendy Proctor, and Juan Rodriguez

    Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · May 29, 2025

    Tanner’s claims are barred by sovereign immunity. HHSC is a state agency, and no statute clearly and unambiguously waives its immunity in this context. Ms. Tanner’s reliance on 42 U.S.C. … Sovereign immunity shields the state and its agencies from lawsuits unless the Legislature has clearly and unambiguously waived that immunity. PHI, Inc. v. Tex. Juvenile Justice Dept., 593 S.W.3d 296, 303 (Tex. 2019).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • South Texas Educational Technologies, Inc. D/B/A Horizon Montessori Public Schools v. Mahdi A. Shaheen

    Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · Jun 1, 2023

    To establish a prima facie case of race or national origin discrimination, the plaintiff must show (1) he was a member of a protected class, (2) he was qualified for his employment position, (3) he was subject … We will assume without deciding that Shaheen was qualified for his position and assess the latter factor.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • University of Texas at San Antonio v. Trevino

    153 S.W.3d 58 · Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · Nov 27, 2002

    However, even if a waiver of immunity may be established under section 101.021, the Act sets forth certain exemptions that will maintain the governmental unit’s sovereign immunity. See Delaney v. … This court did not reach the issue of whether the ADA waived the University's sovereign immunity because the plaintiff was not qualified to assert a claim under the ADA. Id.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Sanchez v. State

    974 S.W.2d 307 · Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · May 20, 1998

    Second, the criminal law must establish determinate guidelines for law enforcement. Long, 931 S.W.2d at 287 . … Does a wink of an eye, a simple smile, a compliment, the placing of a rose in a vase, an invitation to lunch, or a ride home qualify?

    Reversed on other grounds by Sanchez v. State, 1999 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 89 (1999)Cited 9 timesPublished
  • El Paso Community College v. Antonio Lawler

    Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · Nov 30, 2010

    Sovereign Immunity Sovereign immunity deprives a trial court of subject-matter jurisdiction of lawsuits in which the state or certain governmental units have been sued unless the state consents to suit. … EPCC established with its own evidence that an instructor could qualify to teach a credit welding course in May 2004 if he possessed a Texas Teachers Certificate.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Retzlaff v. Internal Revenue Service

    728 F. Supp. 1304 · District Court, E.D. Texas · Jun 28, 1989

    Furthermore, plaintiffs have not overcome the presumption of qualified immunity for government agents. … Unless the plaintiff’s allegations state a claim of violation of clearly established law, a defendant pleading qualified immunity is entitled to dismissal before the commencement of discovery. Mitchell v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.