Case law

Board of Com'rs v. State Highway Commission

163 Okla. 207 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 2, 1933

Wentz v. Ingenthron, 146 Okla. 165 . 294 P. 154 ; Wentz v. Board of County Commissioners of Lincoln County, 147 Okla. 173 , 295 P. 599 ; Wentz v. Dawson, 149 Okla. 94 , 299 P. 493 ; Hawks v. … The plaintiff, board of county commissioners, must have known it.

Oklahoma Planning & Resources Board v. Morgan

347 P.2d 1029 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 15, 1959

William Reedy Morgan, hereinafter called claimant, filed his first notice of injury and claim for compensation stating that on October 31, 1957, while employed by the Oklahoma Planning and Resources Board he sustained an … Morgan Drilling Co. v. Bower, 199 Okl. 667 , 189 P.2d 943 ; Wise-Buchanan Coal Co. v. Risco, 150 Okl. 190 , 1 P.2d 411 ; Ellis & Lewis v. Lane, 152 Okl. 273 , 4 P.2d 104 .

Barnsdall Refineries, Inc. v. State Board

171 Okla. 184 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1935

Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization, cause No. 24271, decided Feb. 12, 1935, 170 Okla. 516 , 41 P. (2d) 453 , having disposed of this matter, the appeal is dismissed.

Pearl v. State Board of Education

95 Okla. 204 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 2, 1923

A motion to dismiss appeal has been filed herein by the defendants in error, alleging that tho appeal is from tin1 action of tho State Board of Education and that no appeal is provided by statute in such cases.

McMahan v. Board of Ed., Oklahoma City

142 Okla. 110 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 1930

Section 26, Id., is a limitation (Eaton v. St. L. & S. F. Ry. … It is his contention that,, because this court, in Coggeshall & Co. v. Smiley, supra, Aaronson v.

Board of County Com'rs v. Kinkeade

198 Okla. 662 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 17, 1946

J., HURST, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, WELCH, and DAVI-SON, JJ., concur.

Cecil v. Board of County Commissioners

10 Okla. 354 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1900

.: Tbis is an appeal from the board of county commissioners of Washita county, to the district court of that county, from an order of the board, declaring, as the result of an election upon the subject, that “stock should … The order of the board of county commissioners was affirmed in the district court, and the case is brought here upon a transcript certified by the clerk of the district court, that “the aboye and foregoing transcript contains

Board of County Com'rs v. Good Twp.

188 Okla. 151 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 12, 1940

Herndon v. Board of Com’rs, etc., 158 Okla. 14 , 11 P. 2d 939 . … This, we say, accords with the holding of this court in Foote v.

Associated Industries v. State Insurance Board

184 Okla. 148 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 20, 1938

Thereafter, at the March 2d hearing, the attorney for plaintiffs appeared before the board and requested that the board conduct no further hearing and take no further action on plaintiffs’ petition filed with the board in … Therefore, for the reasons stated, the matter is remanded to the State Insurance Board for further proceedings consistent with the views herein expressed. OSBORN, O. J., BATLESS, V. O.

Lowery v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

584 P.2d 720 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 19, 1978

The Board denied the license, for reasons to be set out. Lowery appealed Board’s decision to District Court in Washington County. … The court found Board’s decision to be arbitrary and unreasonable, and ordered Board to issue the license. It is from that decision this appeal is taken.

State Board of Dental Examiners v. Pollock

125 Okla. 170 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 15, 1927

See rule announced in; State v. Coyle, 7 Okla. Cr. 50 , 122 Pac. 243 ; Ex parte Hunnicutt, 7 Okla. Cr. 213 , 123 Pac. 179 ; Stout v. State ex rel. Caldwell 36 Okla. 744 , 130 Pac. 553 ; Dickinson v. … Perry, 75 Okla. 25 . 1S1 Pac. 504; Ledegar v. Bockhoven, 77 Okla. 58 , 185 Pac. 1097 ; Leach v. State, 17 Okla. Cr. 322 , 188 Pac. 118 .

James v. Board of Com'rs, McCurtain County

103 Okla. 141 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 7, 1924

On April 6, 1923, it appears that the board of county commissioners authorized the employment of the plaintiff as deputy county treasurer, who testified that he was directed by a member of the board to file his claim for … Dunlap v. Board of County Commissioners, Carter County, 85 Okla. 295 , 205 Pac. 1100 ; City of Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil and Gas Co., 64 Okla. 214 , 166 Pac. 1058 .

Shadid v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

639 P.2d 1239 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 12, 1982

Hines v. Ind. Sch. Dist. No. 50 Grant County, 380 P.2d 943, 946 (Okl.1963). 5 . Brick v. City of Wichita, 195 Kan. 206 , 403 P.2d 964 (1965). 6 . Work v. … Peters v. Hobby, 349 U.S. 331 , 75 S.Ct. 790 , 99 L.Ed. 1129 (1955); Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Central Liquor Co., 421 P.2d 244, 247 (Okl.1966).

Winters v. State Depository Board

460 P.2d 882 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 4, 1969

In City of Wilburton v. King, Atty. … And for a more recent application in this jurisdiction of the rule, see Oklahoma Tax Commission et al. v. Fortinberry Co., Inc., et al. (1949), 201 Okl. 537 , 207 P.2d 301 .

Richardson v. Pardon & Parole Board

435 P.2d 621 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 13, 1967

Harrell v. County Election Board

203 Okla. 360 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 4, 1950

He deposited $250 in cash with the board for the purpose of defraying the expense of the recount. … Coe v. State Election Board et al., 203 Okla. 356 , 221 P. 2d 774 , and for the reasons therein stated, was and is sufficient to entitle said petitioner to a recount as prayed for. Writ granted.

Gallion v. Excise Board of Oklahoma County

171 Okla. 76 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 5, 1935

, that is, the difference between the surplus that was used by the excise board and the amount of surplus claimed by plaintiff in error, to fill up the shrinkage that occurred in the estimated income from sources other than … Co. v. Myers, 114 Okla. 240 , 248 P. 395 ; C. D. Coggeshall & Co. v. Smiley, 142 Okla. 8 , 285 P. 48 ; El Reno Wholesale Grocery Co. v. Taylor, 87 Okla. 140 , 209 P. 749 ; In re Chicago, R. I. & P. R.

LEO v. OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCES BOARD

2023 OK 96 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 3, 2023

OSCN Found Document:LEO v. OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCES BOARD Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only LEO v. … The Board members heard argument from each party at the Board meeting prior to the vote.

Carter County Excise Board v. Kurn

191 Okla. 9 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1942

“It is the further contention of the County Excise Board of Carter County, Oklahoma, that it was the duty of said board under the law to transfer said surplus to the ‘County Highway Cash Fund’ during the fiscal year 1940- … CORN, V. C. J., and RILEY, HURST, and ARNOLD, JJ., absent.

Bell v. Board of County Commissioners

335 P.2d 633 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 10, 1959

We still think that the rule is sound that is laid down in Board of Directors of School Dist. No. 27 of Oklahoma County v. … Board of Excise of Oklahoma County, *636 31 Okl. 553 , 122 P. 520 and Excise Board of Tulsa County v. City of Tulsa, 180 Okl. 248 , 68 P.2d 823 . The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. DAVISON, C. J., WILLIAMS, V.