Case law

Ansong v. District Director of Immigration

596 F. Supp. 882 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 25, 1984

Brown v. Cuyler, 669 F.2d 155, 158 (3d Cir.1982); see Martin v. State of Texas, 694 F.2d 423, 426 (5th Cir.1982) (petitioner must prove the allegations on which he relies in his petition at the evidentiary hearing). … See Velasco-Gutierrez v. Crossland, 732 F.2d 792 (10th Cir.1984); Pasquini v. Morris, 700 F.2d 658 (11th Cir.1983); Dong Sik Kwon v.

Brigham v. Luckenbach

140 F. 322 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 30, 1905

In McWilliams v. Vim (D. … As was the case in Haight v.

Donworth v. Sawyer

94 Me. 242 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 31, 1900

Small v. Jenkins, 16 Gray, 155 ; Jewett v. Foster, 14 Gray, 495 ; Battel v. Smith, 14 Gray, 497 ; Gibbs v. Swift, 12 Cush. 393 . In Brown v. … The right of selection was not a condition precedent, but, as said in Brown v.

Dutill v. Dana

148 Me. 541 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 8, 1952

See Ellerson v. Wescott, 148 N. Y. 149 , 42 N. E. 540 (1896). … See also Sacre v. Sacre et al., 143 Me. 80 , 55 A. (2nd) 592.

Jackson v. Esten

83 Me. 162 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 23, 1891

Johnson v. Day, 17 Pick. 106 ; Hobart v. Bennett, 77 Maine, 401; Hayford v. Everett, 68 Maine, 505. … In Glidden v.

Lovell v. One Bancorp

690 F. Supp. 1090 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 14, 1988

Brown v. Bullock, 294 F.2d 415 (2d Cir.1961). B. … In McGary v.

State v. Radley

2002 Me. 150 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 5, 2002

State v. Sprague, 583 A.2d 203, 204 (Me.1990) (quoting State v. *1131 Carter, 444 A.2d 37, 39 (Me.1982) (emphasis omitted)). … State v. Turner, 2001 ME 44, ¶ 6 , 766 A.2d 1025, 1027 (quoting State v.

Board of Directors of Maine School Administrative District No. 33 v. Teachers Ass'n of Maine School Administrative District No. 33

392 A.2d 1097 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 27, 1978

agreement, not merely a linguistic fortuity in Article V — C. … Fortifying this conclusion is the further provision in Article V-C that the decision of the Board of Directors is “final action.”

Fred Fitanides v. City of Saco

113 A.3d 1088 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 17, 2015

Corp. v. … See White v.

Allen v. Hackett

123 Me. 106 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 10, 1923

Company v. … Opinion of the Justices, 70 Maine, 560; Brown v. Lunt, 37 Maine, 428; Hooper v. Goodwin, 48 Maine, 80; Stuart v. Ellsworth, 105 Maine, 527.

Folsom v. Smith

113 Me. 83 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 18, 1915

The case of Gilbert v. Finch, 173 N. … Elm City Club v. Howes, 92 Maine, 211; Rush v. Buckley, 100 Maine, 322; Hurd v. Chase, 100 Maine, 561; Proctor v. M. C. R. R. Co., 101 Maine, 459.

Hollie A. Beal v. Town of Stockton Springs

153 A.3d 768 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 12, 2017

Kirkpatrick v. … Jusseaume v.

MERRILL TRUST COMPANY v. Johnson

159 Me. 45 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 12, 1963

MacDonald, Executor v. Stubbs, 142 Me. 235, 240 ; 49 A. (2nd) 765; Old Colony Trust Co. v. McGowan, 156 Me. 138, 143 ; 163 A. (2nd) 538; Hazard v. Bliss, 43 R. I. 431; 113 A. 469, 471 (under head-notes 1, 2). … W. (2nd) 120; McNaughton v. Newport (Idaho 1946), 170 P. (2nd) 601.

United States v. Hensel

509 F. Supp. 1376 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 23, 1981

Rakas v. Illinois, supra; Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223, 229 , 93 S.Ct. 1565, 1569 , 36 L.Ed.2d 208 (1973). … United States, 569 F.2d 1053, 1056 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 920 , 98 S.Ct. 2268 , 56 L.Ed.2d 761 (1978); United States v. Brown, 473 F.2d 952, 954 (5th Cir. 1973). See also 1 W.

State v. Fitch

600 A.2d 826 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 19, 1991

Shari Brown testified at trial and described defendant’s involvement. … See State v. Hebert, 480 A.2d 742, 747 (Me.1984); State v. Fredette, 462 A.2d 17, 22-23 (Me.1983).

Weymouth v. Babcock

42 Me. 42 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1856

The receipt given by the plaintiff to Babcock, dated April 19, 1853, was intended as a discharge of Babcock from his moiety of the note in suit, and not intended as a discharge of Brown. Brown was not a party to it. … Shaw v. Pratt, 22 Pick. 305 ; Pond & al. v. Williams, 1 Gray, 630 . Plaintiff has leave to discontinue as to Babcock without costs. Judgment against Brown for damages, as above stated, and for costs. Tenney, C.

State v. Lewis

611 A.2d 69 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 17, 1992

See State v. … See State v.

Chandler v. Dubey

325 A.2d 6 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 4, 1974

This litigation is an aftermath of our decision in Browne v. Dubey, 251 A.2d 424 (Me.1969). … See Wood v. LeGoff, 152 Me. 19 , 121 A.2d 468 (1956); Dietz v. Dietz, 244 Minn. 330 , 70 N.W.2d 281 (1955).

The Naos

144 F. 292 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 14, 1906

In Thompson v. Winslow, supra, the charterer did not attempt to dictate the time, place or manner of performing the towage service in reference to the Marjory Brown. … In the case of the Marjory Brown, in Thompson v. Winslow, supra, this court said in referring to the alleged negligence of Capt.

City of Old Town v. Expera Old Town, LLC

249 A.3d 141 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 20, 2021

See Shawmut Inn v. … Carroll v. Town of Rockport, 2003 ME 135, ¶ 27, 837 A.2d 148. Nevertheless, “[i]f there is 14 sufficient evidence on the record, the Board’s decision will be deemed supported by implicit findings.” Forester v.