Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.88s
5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 254 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Jan 19, 1927
Brown on the 7th day of November 1924. The injury was caused by the slipping of a Ford automobile, in which the deceased was riding, from a high road into a ravine at a point where the< road crossed a culvert.
Cited 0 timesPublished8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 441 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Mar 13, 1935
Brown, a member of the Howitzer Co. 130th Inf. I. N". G., was in the military bus-fire accident that occurred near Pana, Ill., on July 26, 1933. … A Military Medical Board examined claimant at Camp Grant on August 8,1934, and reported there was no permanent disability. Claimant testified he agreed with that report.
Cited 0 timesPublished271 Ill. App. 612 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 22, 1933
Cited 0 timesPublished55 Ill. App. 142 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 28, 1894
In December, 1890, he made a contract with appellee by which the latter and his son were to work it and board such extra hands as might be required. … Brown the hauling of the wheat.”
Cited 0 timesPublished262 Ill. App. 668 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 12, 1931
Cited 0 timesPublished255 Ill. App. 644 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 26, 1929
Cited 0 timesPublished74 Ill. App. 205 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 28, 1898
Brown and Ellen Brown, his wife, to one Samuel Burge, and also a conveyance by the latter to said Ellen Brown, of certain lands, the title to which had previously been in Upton H. … Brown and his wife, Ellen Brown, requiring “ that they each set forth and state the facts and circumstance?
Cited 0 timesPublished31 Ill. App. 2d 71 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 26, 1961
Cited 0 timesPublished38 Ill. 87 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1865
Brown, then the jury will find for the claimant.” … Brown as agent for his son, but should have been made by the claimant in person, or by an attorney at law, is not well taken. The ease of Hitt v. Smith, 3 Scam. 47 , does not apply.
Cited 0 timesPublished26 Ill. 156 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1861
year after maturity, without an agreement with the makers of the note, who were the real and only debtors, to extend the time of payment one year, would amount to nothing, so far as they were concerned, and the answer of Brown
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna