Case law

National Railroad Passenger v. Veolia Transportation Services, Inc.

592 F. Supp. 2d 86 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 8, 2009

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted); see also Walters v. Blankenship, 931 So.2d 137, 139 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.2006); Smith v. … Brown, 395 A.2d 79, 84 (D.C.1978), that is “commercially reasonable to anticipate,” Whelan v. Abell, 953 F.2d 663, 673 (D.C.Cir.1992) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).

Vincent v. Schlesinger

388 F. Supp. 370 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 29, 1975

Although at first glance it would appear that the Board is an “agency” as that term is defined in 5 U.S.C. § 551 (1), Schick v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

McCandless v. Beech Aircraft Corp.

697 F.2d 1156 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 18, 1983

See Messenger v. … See Kline v. Martin, 345 F.Supp. 31 (E.D.Va.1972). But see Falk v. United States, 53 F.R.D. 113 (D.Conn.1971).

Brookens v. Committee on Unauthorized Practice of Law

538 A.2d 1120 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 1988

Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, 636 P.2d 1139, 1143 , 178 Cal. … Brown v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 413 A.2d 1276, 1280 (D.C.1980). 16 .

Stuart H. Fields v. Ronald H. Brown, Secretary, U.S. Department of Commerce

44 F.3d 1031 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 15, 1994

FIELDS, Appellant, v. Ronald H. BROWN, Secretary, U.S. Department of Commerce, Appellee. No. 93-5291. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Dec. 15, 1994.

Sherwin v. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

955 F. Supp. 140 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 27, 1997

Plaintiff appealed his removal to the Philadelphia Regional of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB”). … The Board denied plaintiffs petition, granted the' Air Force’s petition, and affirmed the ALJ’s decision as modified, sustaining the false certification charge but reinstating the penalty of removal. Defs.’

Weems v. Cushwa

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 17, 2021

Parole Board (“Board”) conducted parole hearings for individuals sentenced under the D.C. Code. Bailey v. Fulwood, 793 F.3d 127, 130 (D.C. Cir. 2015). … Price v. Barry, 53 F.3d 369, 370 (D.C. Cir. 1995). And under the 1987 Regulations, “parole is never ‘required after the Board determines that the necessary prerequisites exist.’” Ellis v.

Shepherd v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.

862 F. Supp. 486 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 13, 1994

Theodore Brown, Jr., does not assert that Graves suffers from PTSD. (Brown Decl. (Ex. D to Pl.’s Final Proposed Order for Relief).) … Brown found that “[a]fter losing the position at ABC Mr.

Hazel v. Barry

580 A.2d 110 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 24, 1990

Hooker v. Edes Home, 579 A.2d 608, 617-618 (D.C.1990). 4 . … over the Board.

United States v. Thorne

997 F.2d 1504 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 13, 1993

We relied on United States v. Ruiz, 477 F.2d 918 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1004 , 94 S.Ct. 361 , 38 L.Ed.2d 240 (1973), and Brown v. … The drugs in the closet were in a brown paper bag under a pile of clothes and the triple-beam scale was also in a brown paper bag.

District of Columbia v. New York Life Insurance

650 A.2d 671 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 1994

Rock Creek Plaza-Woodner Ltd. v. District of Columbia, 466 A.2d 857 , 859 n. 1 (D.C.1983) (quoting District of Columbia v. … Citing Wolf v.

Hardrick v. Government of the District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 11, 2026

Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 411 (1997)). Not so at all. … Board of Cnty. Comm’rs, 520 U.S. at 406.

Virgin Islands Housing and Finance Authority v. Federal Emergency Management Agency

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 2024

To start, it waited six weeks before moving to reconsider before the Board—a motion that was clearly not proper. Reply at 21; see Young v. SEC, 956 F.3d 650, 656 (D.C. … Pace v.

Cobell v. Norton

407 F. Supp. 2d 140 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 19, 2005

See also, Brown v. … See, e.g., Pete v. UMW Welf. & Retirement Fund, 517 F.2d 1275 , 1289, 1290 & n. 74 (D.C.Cir.1975) (en banc) (30% reduction); Davis v. Board of School Comm'rs, 526 F.2d 865, 868-69 (5th Cir. 1976); Kane v.

Cemex, Inc. v. Department of the Interior

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 15, 2021

It has also moved for summary 2 The Board’s decision constituted a “final agency action for purposes of judicial review.” Aera Energy LLC v. Salazar, 642 F.3d 212, 218 (D.C. … United States v. Miranda, 780 F.3d 1185, 1189 (D.C. Cir. 2015). 9 Board.” Underwood Livestock, Inc. v. United States, 417 F. App’x 934, 939 (Fed.

Alta Bates Summit Medical Center v. Leavitt

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 8, 2009

Board’s decision. … United States v. Levin, 496 F. Supp. 2d 116, 124 (D.D.C. 2007) (quoting Auer v. Robbins, 519 U.S. 452, 462 (1997)).

McDonald v. United States

496 A.2d 274 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 7, 1985

v. … Ford v. United States, 396 A.2d 191, 193 (D.C.1978).

Leroy Barnett v. Charles M. Rodgers, Superintendent, D. C. Jail, Carl H. Clark v. Charles M. Rodgers, Superintendent, D. C. Jail

410 F.2d 995 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 18, 1969

Cooper v. Pate, 324 F.2d 165, 166-167 (7th Cir. 1963), rev’d on other grounds 378 U.S. 546 , 84 S.Ct. 1733 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1030 (1964). Compare Brown v. … Board of Educ., 347 U.S. 483 , 494 n. 11, 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954); Beauharnais v. Illinois, 343 U.S. 250, 258-263 , 72 S.Ct. 725 , 96 L.Ed. 919 (1952). .

Hall v. United States

454 A.2d 314 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 1982

In Brown v. … The question, under Brown v. United States, supra, is whether the evidence here adequately links Hampton to the commission of the crime that the trial court erred in excluding and otherwise limiting its use.

Potomac Iron Works v. Love

673 F.2d 537 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 19, 1982

Likewise, in the case of a formal hearing, appeal is to the Board. Id. The Board, in either circumstance, has jurisdiction in cases raising “a substantial question of law or fact.” Id. … Bradshaw v. McCarthy, Inc., 3 B.R.B.S. 195, B.R.B. Nos. 75-209 and 75-209A (January 26, 1976). The instant case is not a case in which attorney’s fees were awarded.