Case law

Turner v. Spencer

335 F. Supp. 3d 72 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 5, 2018

Hagelin v. Fed. Election Comm'n , 411 F.3d 237 , 242 (D.C. Cir. 2005). Decisions of a military corrections board are reviewed under an "unusually deferential application" of this standard. Kreis v. … Roberts v. Harvey , 441 F.Supp.2d 111 , 118 (D.D.C. 2006) (quoting Frizelle v. Slater , 111 F.3d 172 , 177 (D.C. Cir. 1997) ). Typically, only the " 'most egregious' Board decisions will fail to satisfy" the standard.

Gunnell Construction Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. District of Columbia, a Municipal Corporation

551 F.2d 425 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 28, 1977

If it does not, the applicable law is that of United States v. … See Gunnell Const Co. v. Contract Appeals Board, 282 A.2d 556 (D.C.App. 1971).

Blaine v. White

267 F. 340 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 2, 1920

Creveling v. Jepson, 47 App. D. C. 597; Lindmark v. Hodgkinson, 31 App. D. C. 612; Murphy v. Meissner, 24 App. D. C. 260; Stone v. Pupin, 19 App. D. C. 396; Podlesak v. McInnerney, 26 App. D. … Mayo v. Whedon, 47 App. D. C. 138, 140. The board sustained the lower tribunals in their holding that the counts were patentable, and readable on the claims of both parties.

McIntosh v. Greenway Apartments, Inc.

164 A.2d 351 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 1960

Lord v. … Co., 5 Cir., 71 F.2d 115 ; Livingston v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 4 Cir., 28 F.2d 563 ; McBreen v. Collins, 284 Mass. 253 , 187 N.E. 591 . But see Williamson v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 237 Miss. 141 , 112 So.2d 529 .

Wagner v. Federal Election Commission

854 F. Supp. 2d 83 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 16, 2012

Brown), ¶ 5; Exh. 4 (Declaration of Jan W. Miller), ¶¶ 5, 7. … Brown).

Furey v. Mnuchin

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 24, 2018

Forkkio v. Powell, 306 F.3d 1127, 1130 (D.C. Cir. 2002), citing Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999). … See Brown v. Vilsack, 923 F.

Mayes v. United States

653 A.2d 856 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 6, 1995

In Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008 (D.C.1991), we stated that [wjhether reasonable suspicion or probable cause exists to justify a seizure is a mixed question of fact and law. … Brown, supra, 590 A.2d at 1014 (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 230 , 103 S.Ct. 2317, 2328 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)).

Hamrick v. Hoffman

550 F. Supp. 2d 8 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 6, 2008

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … Hamrick’s blood pressure, allows the Company to provide between-meal snacks on board ship, and fails to support him in his other litigation). When Mr.

Lighthall v. Watson

175 F. Supp. 258 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 19, 1959

This requirement of “inherent disclosure” is explained in the case of Hoover Co. v. … Abbott v. Coe, 1939, 71 App.D.C. 195 , 109 F.2d 449, 451 . Furthermore, as was pointed out in Hoover Co. v.

Johnson v. United States

562 A.2d 603 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 1989

U.S. v. McIlwain, 427 F.Supp. 358 (D.D.C.1977). … See also U.S. v. Liddy, 397 F.Supp. 947, 949 (D.D.C.1975), aff'd, 530 F.2d 1094 (D.C.Cir.1976).

Robert E. Randall v. Comfort Control, Inc. And Liberty Mutual Insurance Company

725 F.2d 791 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 24, 1984

The Benefits Review Board and the courts have mandated this “forward-looking perspective” precisely because of the short statute of limitations. Hole v. … Day v. Weinberger, 522 F.2d 1154, 1156 (9th Cir.1975). See also NLRB v.

McKeeman v. Jeffer Family Members

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 3, 2026

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quotations omitted). … See Brown v.

United States ex rel. McDuffie v. Hawley

269 F. 479 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 8, 1920

In Moore v. United States, 33 App. D. … Hall v. Dane, 48 App. D. C. 279. The application for the writ was properly denied by the lower court, and its judgment is affirmed, with costs. Affirmed.

National Biscuit Division v. Leedom

265 F.2d 101 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 1, 1959

John V. Long and James H. Heller, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellant. Mr. Norton J. Come, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. … expertise and discretion' 2 and was therefore controlled by our decision in De Pratter v.

Federal Housing Finance Agency v. Raines

725 F. Supp. 2d 159 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 28, 2010

The other cases were originally captioned as Kellmer v. Raines (Civ. No. 07-1173), Arthur v. Mudd (Civ. No. 07-2130), and Agnes v. Raines (Civ. No. 08-1093). … Grossman v.

Association of Flight Attendants, Afl-Cio v. Usair, Inc.

24 F.3d 1432 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 7, 1994

Indeed, the Board has no authority to adjudicate such contractual issues. See Chicago & N.W. Ry. Co. v. United Transp. Union, 402 U.S. 570, 581 , 91 S.Ct. 1731, 1737 , 29 L.Ed.2d 187 (1971). 4 . … In Western Airlines, Inc. v.

Stack v. United States

519 A.2d 147 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 1986

v. … To require a greater proffer for the admissibility of such exculpatory evidence would distort Beale and Brown.

Hall v. Henry J. Robb, Inc.

34 A.2d 863 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 3, 1943

Judgment for possession was granted and that judgment affirmed by this court in Hall v. Henry J. Robb, Incorporated, D.C.Mun.App., 32 A.2d 707 . … Hall v. Henry J. Robb, Incorporated, supra. Fabianich v. Hart, D.C.Mun.App., 31 A.2d 881 . Lindner v. District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 32 A.2d 540 .

United States v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc., Trans World Airlines, Inc., United Air Lines, Inc., Braniff Airways, Inc., Northwest Airlines, Inc., Intervenors. United States of America v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc., Trans World Airlines, Inc., United Air Lines, Inc., Braniff Airways, Inc., Northwest Airlines, Inc., Intervenors

511 F.2d 1315 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 23, 1975

Compare Pan American World Airways v. … See also, Pan American World Airways v.

Don't Tear It Down, Inc. v. D. C. Department of Housing & Community Development

428 A.2d 369 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 6, 1981

Citizens Association of Georgetown, supra 402 A.2d at 42 ; Newsweek, supra at 376 A.2d 784 ; Dietrich v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 293 A.2d 470,472-73 (1972). … First, it is clear from Kopff, supra, and Wheeler v.