Case law

Lodge 1858, American Federation of Government Employees v. James E. Webb, Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Lodge 1858, American Federation of Government Employees v. James E. Webb, Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Appeal of National Council of Technical Service Industries

580 F.2d 496 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 19, 1978

NLRB v. United Insurance Co., 390 U.S. 254, 256 , 88 S.Ct. 988, 989 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1083 (1968). See also Brown v. NLRB, 462 F.2d 699 (9th Cir.), Cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1008 , 93 S.Ct. 441 , 34 L.Ed.2d 301 (1972); NLRB v. … Carey, 30 Ga.App. 378, 378 , 118 S.E. 445, 445 (1923); Richardson v. Browning, 61 Cal.App. 110, 113 , 214 P. 281, 283 (1923); State v.

Crum v. United States Parole Commission

814 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 14, 1993

In particular Petitioner believes that the cases of Cosgrove v. Smith, 697 F.2d 1125 (D.C.Cir.1983), and its progeny Cosgrove v. … However, the habeas relief recognized in Morrissey v.

Linwood A. Arrington v. Anderson McGruder

490 F.2d 795 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 25, 1974

Zerbst v. Kidwell, supra,. … This Court held in Stapf v.

Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of Labor v. Edward Minte Company, Inc.

803 F.2d 731 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 17, 1986

Minte has not sought to challenge this order and so we express no view as to whether the Board correctly applied section 8(f) in light of our decision in C & P Telephone Co. v. … The Director has standing to bring this suit as a person adversely affected by a final order of the Board. See Director, OWCP v. Belcher Erectors, 770 F.2d 1220 , 1221 (D.C.Cir.1985). 8 .

United States v. Eiland

525 F. Supp. 2d 37 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 27, 2007

Charles Brown, another participant in the conspiracy, was paid by defendant Miller to accept a package of drugs delivered to Brown’s residence. (Trial Tr., 32, Oct. 18, 2006.) … accept a parcel of narcotics that was mailed to Brown’s residence.

Willard Stark v. Washington Star Co. And Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of Labor

833 F.2d 1025 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 20, 1987

Exarchou v. … See PATCO v.

Dupont Circle Citizens Ass'n v. Barry

455 A.2d 417 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 7, 1983

We are guided by the benchmark language in Board of Regents v. … District of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review, supra at 216 n. 12, we noted that the Supreme Court in Simon v.

Marmion v. McClellan

11 App. D.C. 467 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 7, 1897

Brown v. Cowell, 116 Mass. 465 ; Jennison v. Hopgood, 7 Pick. 1 ; Farnham v. Brooks, 9 Pick. 212 . … Chappedelaine v. Dechenaue, 4 Cranch, 306 ; Lake v. Tyson, 6 N. Y. 461 ; DeFreest v. Bloomingdale, 5 Denio, 304 ; Maybury v. Berkery, 102 Mich. 126 ; Rice’s Ev., p. 103; 1 Taylor Ev., Sec. 124; Gaskin v.

American Council of Life Insurers v. District of Columbia Health Benefit Exchange Authority

73 F. Supp. 3d 65 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 13, 2014

Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Mgmt. Dist., 133 S. Ct. 2586, 2601 (2013). The Court highlighted the “illustrative” case of Brown v. … Id. at 2600-01 (citing Brown v.

Cardwell v. Investor's Analysis, Inc.

620 F. Supp. 1395 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 31, 1985

The Court also notes that defendant's appearance before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board does not constitute "doing business" for purposes of long-arm jurisdiction. See E. & J. Gallo Winery v. … See, e.g., Barr Rubber Products Co. v. Burlington *1398 Mills, Inc., 306 F.2d 268, 269 (D.C.Cir.1962); Hayes v. Livermont, 279 F.2d 818, 818 (D.C.Cir.1960); Chris Laganas Shoe Co. v.

In re Sobo

905 A.2d 158 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 27, 2006

No exceptions to the Board’s Report and Recommendation have been filed. … Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Maryland v. Sobo, 386 Md. 1 , 870 A.2d 1217 (2005). On May 17, 2005, Bar Counsel filed a certified copy of the order from the Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Francis S. Hall v. James A. Baker, Secretary, U.S. Department of State

867 F.2d 693 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 14, 1989

Hatch v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 654 F.2d 825, 835 (D.C.Cir.1981); see N.L. R.B. v. Washington Star Co., 732 F.2d 974, 977 (D.C.Cir.1984); see also National Black Media Coalition v. … The Board has thus been “intolerably mute” in the course of altering its interpretive position, see Greater Boston Television v.

Shelton v. United States

323 A.2d 717 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 20, 1974

Compare, e. g., People v. Smith, 37 Ill.2d 622 , 230 N.E.2d 169 (1967). … See Hardy v. United States, 119 U.S.App.D.C. 364 , 343 F.2d 233 (1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 984 , 85 S.Ct. 1353 , 14 L.Ed. 2d 276 (1965) ; McIntosh v.

Board Of Water, Light And Sinking Fund Commissioners Of The City Of Dalton, Georgia v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

931 F.2d 94 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 26, 1991

931 F.2d 94 289 U.S.App.D.C. 249 , 123 P.U.R.4th 572 BOARD OF WATER, LIGHT AND SINKING FUND COMMISSIONERS OF the CITY OF DALTON, GEORGIA, Petitioners, v. … FERC, 851 F.2d 1479 , 1484 (D.C.Cir.1988) (quoting Southern Union Gas Co. v.

Leopold v. Pittman

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 20, 2022

Capitol Police Board (“USCP Board”), which authorization has not been granted. Defs.’ SMF ¶ 8; OGC Decl. ¶ 9 (citing 2 U.S.C. § 1979). … to the Board’s statutory authority to regulate the distribution of such security information.

Communist Party of United States v. McGrath

96 F. Supp. 47 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 28, 1951

Under United States v. … ." [10] See Rogers v.

Bennett v. United States

876 A.2d 623 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 2005

Id. at 79 (citing Guzman v. United States, 769 A.2d 785, 790 (D.C.2001)) (in turn citing (Rocky) Brown v. United States, 683 A.2d 118, 124 (D.C.1996)). … v.

Smoot Sand & Gravel Corp. v. Britton

152 F.2d 17 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 26, 1945

In the absence of an express prohibition by the employer against riding on the running board, the circumstances could reasonably imply consent. 7 In Smith v. … of risk which was involved in Monahan v.

Stutler v. Heflin

46 F. Supp. 539 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 25, 1942

West v. Bauduit, 59 App.D.C. 74, 75 , 33 F.2d 370 . … Best v. District of Columbia, 291 U. S. 411, 415 , 54 S.Ct. 487 , 78 L.Ed. 882 ; Gunning v. Cooley, 281 U.S. 90, 94 , 50 S.Ct. 231 , 74 L.Ed. 720 ; Jackson v.

Shima v. Shima

139 F.2d 533 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 27, 1943

Shima v. Shima, 75 U.S.App.D.C. 370 , 130 F.2d 809 . D.c.Code 1940, § 16-410. Myers v. Myers, 55 App.D.C. 224 , 4 F.2d 300 ; Tendler v. Tendler, 56 App.D.C. 296 , 12 F.2d 831 ; Boardman v. … See Brown, Personal Property, (1936) 503, 504.