Case law

Flores v. Brown

341 Or. App. 815 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 9, 2025

Affirmed. 816 Flores v. Brown KAMINS, J. … Blain v.

Flores v. Brown

341 Or. App. 815 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 9, 2025

Affirmed. 816 Flores v. Brown KAMINS, J. … Blain v.

Fisher/Gordon v. Board of Parole

239 Or. App. 603 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 22, 2010

Nonetheless, the board argues that this court previously decided this issue adversely to petitioner in Turner v. Reed, 22 Or App 177 , 538 P2d 373 (1975). The board’s reliance on Turner is misplaced. … GORDON v.

Eastep v. Veterinary Medical Examining Board

22 Or. App. 457 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 10, 1975

Upon review the Board concluded those findings were correct, denied his application for renewal of his license to practice, and permanently revoked his right to practice veterinary medicine in this state. … Bal duyck v. Morgan, 9 Or App 363 , 497 P2d 377 (1972). Petitioner next contends that the testimony of Dr.

Cooper v. Fair Dismissal Appeals Board

31 Or. App. 521 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 7, 1977

There is nothing in the record to indicate that this was the basis for the Board’s decision. … No. 48 v. Fair Dis. App. Bd., 14 Or App 634 , 514 P2d 1114 (1973). The District failed to meet that burden.

Erskine v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

257 Or. App. 71 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 12, 2013

Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Psychiatric Security Review Board (the board) conditionally releasing him to the custody of the Oregon Department of Corrections (DOC). We reverse and remand. … In view of the requirements of ORS 161.341, we agree and accept the board’s concession. Accordingly, the board’s order must be reversed and the case remanded.

Afzal v. Public Employees Retirement Board

239 Or. App. 284 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 1, 2010

ORS 183.482(8)(a), (b );Lenon v. PERB, 228 Or App 20, 25 , 206 P3d 1165 , rev den, 347 Or 365 (2009). On the basis of that review, we reverse and remand. … Drew v. PSRB, 322 Or 491, 500 , 909 P2d 1211 (1996) (explaining *293 the substantial reason test) (emphasis in original).

English v. Public Employees Retirement Board

230 Or. App. 506 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 2, 2009

In Hewitt v. State Accident Ins. … In support *514 of that proposition, petitioners rely on Tanner v.

Llewellyn v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners

318 Or. 120 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1993

Petitioner seeks review of a Court of Appeals’ decision affirming an order of the State Board of Chiropractic Examiners (Board) that revoked petitioner’s chiropractic license. ORS 684.100. 1 Llewellyn v. … He would have remanded the case to the Board for a new hearing. Llewellyn v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners, supra, 119 Or App at 404-05 (Rossman, P. J., dissenting). 9 Larry D.

O'Bremski v. Oregon Board of Parole

91 Or. App. 164 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 11, 1988

1986, the Board made similar and equally inexplicable errors relating to petitioner’s release date. 2 On January 29,1987, the Board fixed the release date as March 8, 1996. … In a Board Action Form dated April 3,1986, the Board reaffirmed its finding of severe emotional disturbance and its previously set parole release date of March, 1987.

Moll v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners

248 Or. App. 262 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 15, 2012

App. 262 MOLL v. BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS. A146772 Court of Appeals of Oregon. February 15, 2012. Affirmed without opinion.

Laing v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

192 Or. App. 462 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 10, 2004

White v. Goth, 182 Or App 138, 141 , 47 P3d 550 (2002). … Hampton Tree Farms, Inc. v. Jewett, 320 Or 599, 609 , 892 P2d 683 (1995).

Merrick v. Board of Higher Education

103 Or. App. 328 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 5, 1990

Oregon Medical Association v. Rawls, 281 Or 293 , 574 P2d 1103 (1978), is distinguishable. … Furthermore, a declaration of this court that determines whether the Board’s rules are valid in the light of Measure 8 will bind petitioner and respondents and not be merely advisory. See Brown v.

Strunk v. Public Employees Retirement Board

343 Or. 226 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 11, 2007

Salem, Deschutes County, the League of Oregon Cities, and the Oregon School Boards Association. … See Kahn v.

Rios v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

135 Or. App. 265 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 28, 1995

Petitioner seeks review of the order of the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) denying his request for conditional release, and ordering his continued commitment. ORS 161.346(1). We affirm. … See Rios v. PSRB, 115 Or App 433 , 838 P2d 1118 (1992), rev den 317 Or 163 (1993); Rios v. PSRB, 94 Or App 565 , 767 P2d 119 (1988), rev den 307 Or 514 (1989); Rios v. PSRB, 75 Or App 579 , 707 P2d 643 (1985).

Smith v. State Board of Parole

297 Or. 184 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 30, 1984

We conclude that the Board erred, reverse the Court of Appeals and remand the case to the Board of Parole for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. … Accordingly, we remand this case to the Board of Parole for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Reversed and remanded to the Board of Parole.

Stalder v. Board of Medical Examiners

37 Or. App. 853 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 1978

See Voelz v. … Stacey v.

Strecker v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

154 Or. App. 130 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 27, 1998

That determination is not a sentencing decision that permits the exercise of discretion by the Board. See State v. … In State v.

Folk v. State Board of Parole

53 Or. App. 142 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 13, 1981

Harris v. Board of Parole, 47 Or App 289 , 614 P2d 602 (1980). We affirm. Our scope of review is governed by ORS 183.482(8), which provides: "(8) (a) The court may affirm, reverse or remand the order. … See State v. Shumway, 291 *147 Or 153 , 630 P2d 796 (1981).

Norden v. STATE, WATER RESOURCES DEPT.

329 Or. 641 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 17, 2000

See Erck v. Brown Oldsmobile, 311 Or 519, 528 , 815 P2d 1251 (1991) (substantial evidence standard of review in APA does not require reviewing court to “explain away” conflicting evidence). … Fitzstephens v.